Front. Water Frontiers in Water Front. Water 2624-9375 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/frwa.2021.789702 Water Correction Corrigendum: Integrating Behavioral Theories in Agent-Based Models for Agricultural Drought Risk Assessments Schrieks Teun 1 * Botzen W. J. Wouter 1 2 3 Wens Marthe 1 Haer Toon 1 Aerts Jeroen C. J. H. 1 1Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands 2Utrecht University School of Economics (U.S.E.), Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands 3Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States

Edited and reviewed by: Heidi Kreibich, German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, Germany

 *Correspondence: Teun Schrieks teun.schrieks@vu.nl

This article was submitted to Water and Human Systems, a section of the journal Frontiers in Water

 24 11 2021 2021 3 789702 05 10 2021 08 11 2021 Copyright © 2021 Schrieks, Botzen, Wens, Haer and Aerts. 2021 Schrieks, Botzen, Wens, Haer and Aerts

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on Integrating Behavioral Theories in Agent-Based Models for Agricultural Drought Risk Assessments Schrieks, T., Botzen, W. J. W., Wens, M., Haer. T., and Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2021). Front. Water 3:686329. doi: 10.3389/frwa.2021.686329 agent-based model (ABM) drought risk assessment behavioral theory adaptation behavior human decision-making smallholder farmer

In the original article, there was an error. In equation (3) in section Behavioral Theories, Expected Utility Theory, the discount factor in the budget constraint was presented as 1(1-r)t. The standard formula for the discount factor is however 1(1+r)t. The minus in the original article should be a plus.

A correction has been made to Behavioral Theories, Expected Utility Theory, paragraph 3, Equation 3:

Cm,0≤∑t=0T1(1+r)t(Wt−∑i=1IpiRi,m,t)

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.