<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Vet. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Veterinary Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Vet. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2297-1769</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2025.1661118</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Veterinary Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Tapeworms of freshwater fishes in North America: an integrative review of taxonomy, phylogeny, host specificity, and research priorities</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Scholz</surname>
<given-names>Tom&#x00E1;&#x0161;</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3001850/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kuchta</surname>
<given-names>Roman</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1089083/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>&#x010C;esk&#x00E9; Bud&#x011B;jovice</addr-line>, <country>Czechia</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001"><p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2853793/overview">Gustavo Viozzi</ext-link>, National University of Comahue, Argentina</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002"><p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3130422/overview">Nathalia J. Arredondo</ext-link>, CONICET Institute of Biodiversity and Experimental and Applied Biology (IBBEA), Argentina</p><p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3134450/overview">Abuelhassan Elshazly Younis</ext-link>, Aswan University, Egypt</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Tom&#x00E1;&#x0161; Scholz, <email>tscholz@paru.cas.cz</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>02</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>1661118</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>07</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>02</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Scholz and Kuchta.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Scholz and Kuchta</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Tapeworms (Cestoda) are a diverse group of parasitic flatworms that are highly specialized in a parasitic lifestyle. The freshwater fish tapeworms of North America have been relatively well studied since 1855, although their diversity is limited compared to other regions. Most knowledge was gained in the 20th century, with research declining in recent decades, although some groups have recently been revised based on morphological and molecular data. This review updates the current understanding of species diversity, phylogenetic relationships and host&#x2013;parasite interactions based on a critical re-evaluation of the earlier records. The new data can also inform fisheries management, invasive species control and public health surveillance. Currently, 130 valid adult species are known in six orders, most of which are native to the Nearctic, with the USA having the greatest diversity (121 species). The vast majority of North American fish tapeworms exhibit narrow host specificity, with almost three quarters specializing in a single host species or host genus. Larval stages (metacestodes) from four orders also occur in fish, but are difficult to identify morphologically. Future work should focus primarily on little-studied fish groups and regions with probably undescribed diversity (e.g., the southern USA), combined with integrative taxonomic approaches.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>diversity</kwd>
<kwd>evolution</kwd>
<kwd>host-parasite associations</kwd>
<kwd>distribution</kwd>
<kwd>Cestoda</kwd>
<kwd>ray-finned fish</kwd>
<kwd>Nearctic region</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn1">Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="75"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="10383"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Parasitology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Fish parasitology has a long tradition in North America, and numerous parasitologists have contributed significantly to today&#x2019;s knowledge of the diversity and biology of freshwater fish parasites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>). The first fish tapeworm in North America was <italic>Bothrimonus sturionis</italic> from sturgeon <italic>Acipenser oxyrinchus</italic> in Ohio (USA), described by Duvernoy in 1842. Most of the knowledge was summarized in monographs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>) or synopses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>). However, this knowledge was based on the morphological identification, which may lead to misidentifications and does not allow a reliable assessment of their phylogenetic relationships and the true range of their host specificity. In addition, research focus on fish parasites slowed down over the last three decades (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>). As a result, species lists are outdated, there are numerous taxonomic confusions and a lack of molecular data for most taxa.</p>
<p>Tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda) are an interesting and widespread group that provide a suitable model for morphological, physiological, ecological and evolutionary studies due to their unique adaptations to parasitism, their complex life cycles and their close relationship with their hosts. At the beginning of the 20th century, 125 species of adult tapeworms were reported from North American freshwater fishes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2 ref3">1&#x2013;3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>).</p>
<p>More recently, fish tapeworms have been intensively studied using methods of integrative taxonomy and phylogenetics, i.e., properly prepared, heat-fixed specimens, including their molecular vouchers of newly collected and museum material. The aim of this review is to provide an updated synthesis of species diversity, phylogenetic relationships, host associations and biogeography, and to highlight important gaps and future research directions in North American freshwater fish tapeworms.</p>
<p>The classification of host specificity follows the classification of Kuchta et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>) for helminth parasites of cypriniform fish in North America and Europe, with slight modifications, namely: (i) strict specialist (in only one host species); (ii) congeneric specialist (in several host species of the same genus); (iii) suprageneric specialist (in species of several closely related genera); (iv) low generalist (in hosts of different, not closely related genera); (v) high generalist (in hosts of unrelated fish orders or suborders).</p>
<p>We are well aware of the different categories of host specificity [e.g., (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7 ref8 ref9">7&#x2013;9</xref>)] and have carefully reviewed the different terms used in the literature. Ultimately, however, we used the categories proposed by Kuchta et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>) for tapeworms and &#x2018;monogeneans&#x2019; of cypriniform fishes in North America, as they best reflect the taxonomic categories of North American fish hosts of tapeworms, particularly suckers (Catostomidae).</p>
<p>To make the text clearer, authorities and years for parasite and host taxa are omitted throughout the manuscript. The complete authorities of cestode taxa can be found in the Global Cestode Database (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>) and those of fish hosts FishBase.<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1001"><sup>1</sup></xref></p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Species diversity in North America</title>
<p>Since 2000, 21 new species have been described and seven new genera have been proposed (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). However, several species recognized by Hoffman (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>) have been synonymized (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>). In addition, a new subfamily, Essexiellinae, was proposed, which includes the North American tapeworms previously assigned to the Corallobothriinae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>).</p>
<p>To date, 130 species of adult tapeworms parasitizing freshwater fish in North America, including Neotropical Mexico, have been described (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). Most species belong to the orders Caryophyllidea (72 species) and Onchoproteocephalidea I [here referred to as Proteocephalidae as they are the only family of the former order Proteocephalidea &#x2013; see (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>)] (37 species), followed by Bothriocephalidea (15 species). The individual cestode orders, which are arranged alphabetically, are briefly commented on below.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Examples of adult tapeworms (Cestoda) of fhreshwater fishes <italic>in situ</italic>. <bold>(A)</bold> Live <italic>Amphilina foliacea</italic> (Amphilinidea) from the body cavity of <italic>Acipenser ruthenus</italic>, Slovakia (no image of an amphilinidean from North America was available); <bold>(B)</bold> <italic>Cyathocephalus truncatus</italic> (Spathebothriidea) from the intestine of <italic>Salvelinus alpinus</italic>, Norway (no image of a spathebothriidean from North America was available); <bold>(C)</bold> <italic>Haplobothrium globuliforme</italic> (Haplobothriidea) from the intestine of <italic>Amia calva</italic>, Mississippi, USA; <bold>(D)</bold> <italic>Isoglaridacris floriani</italic> in the intestine of <italic>Moxostoma macrolepidotum</italic>, South Carolina, USA; <bold>(E)</bold> <italic>Marsipometra hastata</italic> (Bothriocephalidea) from the intestine of <italic>Polyodon spatula</italic>, Mississippi, USA; <bold>(F)</bold> <italic>Essexiella fimbriata</italic> (Proteocephalidae) from the intestine of <italic>Ictalurus punctatus</italic>, Nebraska, USA.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-12-1661118-g001.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">The image shows six panels labeled A to F, depicting different types of parasitic worms against a black background. Panel A displays a single, oval-shaped worm. Panel B contains several slender, elongated worms. Panel C shows a close-up of a segmented worm. Panel D features a cluster of thin, coiled worms attached to gut tissue. Panel E presents numerous long, curved worms. Panel F shows a thicker, looped worm.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Bothriocephalidea</title>
<p>The tapeworms of the Bothriocephalidea, which are found in North American freshwater fish (in total 15 species - <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), do not form a monophyletic group. Instead, they belong to five separate, not closely related lineages of all three families. Relatively little progress has been made on bothriocephalidean tapeworms in North America since 2000, with the exception of studies on species of <italic>Bothriocephalus</italic>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Diversity and zoogeographical distribution of tapeworms (Cestoda) in freshwater fishes of North America.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-12-1661118-g002.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Pie chart illustrating the distribution of various taxonomic groups of parasitic worms, with images of representatives. Major segments include Caryophyllidea (73 species), Proteocephalidae (36), Bothriocephalidea (15), Haplobothriidea (3), Spathebothriidea (3), and Amphilinidea (1). Segment labels detail regional species counts: Holarctic (HOL), Neotropical (NEO), Neartic (NEA), Paleotropical (PAL). Images of worms are shown around the chart, each representing a specific group.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The taxonomic history of this species-rich genus is confused due to the generally uniform morphology of its species, the inadequate descriptions of many taxa, and the poor quality of museum specimens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>). One of the most common species, <italic>Bothriocephalus cuspidatus</italic>, has been reported from 33 North American fish species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>). A closer examination of &#x2018;<italic>B. cuspidatus</italic>&#x2019; from different hosts based on specimens collected using uniform methods of heat kill and fixation, provided evidence that several separate species have been grouped under the name <italic>B. cuspidatus</italic> in the past (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>).</p>
<p>The combination of morphological and molecular data provided evidence for divergence and host specialization patterns in these tapeworms. As a result, <italic>B. kupermani</italic> has been described from sunfishes (<italic>Lepomis</italic> spp.) and three other putative new taxa from <italic>Ambloplites rupestris</italic>, <italic>Micropterus dolomieu</italic> and <italic>M. salmoides</italic> are to be formally described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>). These data, which demonstrate narrow host specificity of individual species, also have implications for faunistic surveys, biodiversity assessments and ecological studies.</p>
<p>A phylogenetic study by Brabec et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>) showed that the genus <italic>Bothriocephalus</italic> is an artificial assemblage of several not closely related lineages. Therefore, Scholz et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>) proposed the new genus <italic>Bothriocestus</italic> to include freshwater species previously placed in <italic>Bothriocephalus</italic>, including Holarctic <italic>B. claviceps</italic> (type species) and Nearctic <italic>B. cuspidatus</italic> and <italic>B. kupermani</italic>. The establishment of <italic>Bothriocestus</italic> was important to resolve long-standing phylogenetic disagreements, which were further complicated by the fact that the species of the new genus and those of <italic>Bothriocephalus</italic> do not differ by distinct morphological characters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Caryophyllidea</title>
<p>This order includes monozoic tapeworms, i.e., they have a single set of genital organs and no proglottisation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>). Most of the North American species occur in suckers (Catostomidae), where the group has spread relatively recently. These fishes are abundant and widespread in North America. The high level of research activity over the last two decades has enabled the revision of four genera, namely <italic>Archigetes</italic>, <italic>Biacetabulum</italic>, <italic>Glaridacris</italic> and <italic>Promonobothrium</italic> [see (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22 ref23 ref24 ref25 ref26 ref27">22&#x2013;27</xref>)].</p>
<p>In addition, 17 new species have been described (most of them from the southern USA) in the following genera: <italic>Archigetes</italic> (3 spp.), <italic>Biacetabulum</italic> (5), <italic>Dieffluvium</italic> (1) <italic>Isoglaridacris</italic> (6) and <italic>Promonobothrium</italic> (2). Three new genera have been proposed, namely <italic>Homeomorpha</italic> [recently synonymized with <italic>Isoglaridacris</italic> by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>)], <italic>Megancestus</italic> and <italic>Pseudoglaridacris</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">29</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">30</xref>). These genera represent important phylogenetic lineages and were proposed to reconcile the genus classification with the molecular phylogenetic data.</p>
<p>Currently, 73 species of Caryophyllidea are recognized as valid in North America (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), which corresponds to an increase of 30% compared to the end of the 20th century. The distribution of all taxa shows that species diversity is increasing from north to south, possibly due to the greater diversity of catostomids in the southern part of the USA. Molecular data suggest that there may be undescribed species. There is a large gap in our knowledge of tapeworms of endemic catostomids in the western part of North America, as shown by the recent description of two new <italic>Isoglaridacris</italic> species from these fishes in northwestern Mexico (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Proteocephalidae (Onchoproteocephalidea I)</title>
<p>The taxonomy of this group is probably the most difficult among all freshwater fish tapeworms, especially with regard to the polyphyletic genus <italic>Proteocephalus</italic>. In addition to freshwater fish, species of this group also infect amphibians, reptiles and even a mammal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>). In total, 15 species (instead of 23) of the <italic>Proteocephalus</italic> species-aggregate (= &#x2018;true&#x2019; <italic>Proteocephalus</italic> or <italic>Proteocephalus</italic> sensu stricto) were recognized as valid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>). The Proteocephalidae are the second most species-rich group, but the number of recently described species is low (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>).</p>
<p>The main reasons for this are the poor quality of historical material and the lack of molecular data. In addition, most research activities have focused on the revision of individual genera, and some of newly collected material, which most likely contains new species, is still being analyzed (unpublished data).</p>
<p>Significant achievements were the correction of misidentifications (e.g., a new species from sticklebacks), the clarification of host specificity (a new species of a newly proposed genus specific to gars) and the reorganization of the phylogenetic tree with regard to the genus and subfamily affiliation of tapeworms from ictalurids and gars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31 ref32 ref33 ref34">31&#x2013;34</xref>). It is likely that future studies on new, properly fixed material, mainly from salmonids, will reveal the existence of further species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>).</p>
<p>In contrast, little progress has been made in clarifying the inadequately clarified taxonomic situation of the <italic>Proteocephalus</italic> species-aggregate of salmonids and minnows. Hoffman (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>) reported 11 species from salmonids, but most taxa were synonymised with <italic>P. longicollis</italic> on the basis of morphological studies, but without molecular data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">37</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">38</xref>).</p>
<p>Recently, however, it was found that some of the synonymised species are indeed valid, such as <italic>P. exiguus</italic>, a specific parasite of North American whitefish (<italic>Coregonus</italic> spp.) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">39</xref>). Scholz et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>) commented on the taxonomic status and possible validity of <italic>Proteocephalus</italic> species described from North American whitefish (<italic>Coregonus</italic> spp.), but their taxonomic status cannot be clarified without a detailed morphological and especially molecular assessment of new, properly processed specimens.</p>
<p>In addition to these revisions, new genera for tapeworms specific to ictalurids and bowfin that are endemic to North America were established to reflect phylogenetic findings: (1) <italic>Essexiella</italic> was proposed to include <italic>Corallobothrium fimbriatum</italic> from the channel catfish <italic>Ictalurus punctatus</italic>; and (2) <italic>Laruella</italic> was proposed for <italic>Proteocephalus perplexus</italic> from bowfins, as it is phylogenetically distinct from the &#x2018;true&#x2019; <italic>Proteocephalus</italic> species-aggregate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Three small cestode orders</title>
<p>Of three small orders reported from North American freshwater fishes, namely Amphilinidea (1 species, <italic>Amphilina japonica</italic>, occurs in sturgeon), Haplobothriidea (2 endemic species of <italic>Haplobothrium</italic> occur in bowfin) and Spathebothriidea (3 species occur in a wide range of freshwater and <italic>Diplocotyle olrikii</italic> also in marine fishes), no new species were described (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>).</p>
<p>Although these orders are represented by only a small number of species in North America, they are important from a phylogenetic perspective (as evolutionary relicts), because of their host specificity (in evolutionarily ancient fish hosts such as sturgeons and bowfin), and because of the overall rarity of most species, with the exception of <italic>Bothrimonus sturionis</italic> and <italic>Cyathocephalus truncatus</italic>, which has been reported from a number of non-closely related fish hosts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>). Moreover, <italic>B. sturionis</italic> was the first fish tapeworm reported in North America (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">40</xref>), but its validity remains unclear (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">41</xref>).</p>
<p>One challenge is the need to review two <italic>Haplobothrium</italic> species that have been reported in the past from the ruddy bowfin (<italic>Amia calva</italic>), following the recent recognition of a second <italic>Amia</italic> species in North America (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">42</xref>). The eyetail (or emerald) bowfin, <italic>Amia ocellicauda</italic>, has a large range and is found in the Great Lakes and Mississippi Basin, while <italic>A. calva</italic> is only distributed in the southeastern United States, particularly in Florida and adjacent states with short rivers leading to the Gulf of Mexico (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">42</xref>). Since <italic>Haplobothrium bistrobilae</italic> occurs exclusively in Florida, it is necessary to genetically compare the <italic>Haplobothrium</italic> tapeworms of both fish species. With strict host specificity (occurrence of <italic>H. globuliforme</italic> in <italic>A. ocellicauda</italic> and <italic>H. bistrobilae</italic> in <italic>A. calva</italic>), the distribution of the tapeworms would help to confirm host speciation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>3</label>
<title>Phylogenetic relationships and classification</title>
<p>Over the past two and half decades, great progress has been made in understanding the relationships between tapeworms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43 ref44 ref45">43&#x2013;45</xref>), including taxa that parasitise bony fishes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">46</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>). These phylogenetic insights are crucial for a better understanding of host&#x2013;parasite coevolution, biogeography and taxonomy, including a more natural classification of tapeworms. Knowledge of the phylogenetic position and relationships of North American fish tapeworms has improved considerably since 2000. It has been shown that they do not even form a monophyletic group in the same order, with the exception of the native Caryophyllidea (Capingentidae &#x2013; see below). It is evident that the colonization of North American freshwater fishes by tapeworms has occurred several times independently (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>).</p>
<p>Phylogenetic studies have also confirmed the uniqueness of the tapeworm fauna of North American freshwater fishes, as it consists predominantly of species endemic to this continent (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). Numerous genera (e.g., <italic>Marsipometra</italic>, almost all native Caryophyllidea, <italic>Corallotaenia</italic>, <italic>Cordicestus</italic>, <italic>Essexiella</italic>, <italic>Laruella</italic> &#x2013; all Proteocephalidae), subfamilies (e.g., Essexiellinae &#x2013; Proteocephalidae), families (Capingentidae &#x2013; Caryophyllidea) and even an order (Haplobothriidea) are endemic to the Nearctic region.</p>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Bothriocephalidea</title>
<p>Brabec et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>) assessed the relationships of the order, parasitising marine and freshwater bony fishes, using molecular phylogenetic analyses with multiple genes covering about 70% of the currently recognized genera. The new phylogenetic data challenged the morphological classification. In contrast, some patterns in host utilization and environments (freshwater versus marine species) were revealed, but biogeographic patterns are not evident [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>)]. Some of the most basal taxa including North American endemic genus <italic>Marsipometra</italic> from paddlefish <italic>Polyodon spathula</italic> are parasite of freshwater fish, but the origin of the order cannot be resolved based on the available molecular data [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>)].</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Simplified phylogenetic tree of the Bothriocephalidea inferred from partial 28S rDNA sequences showing the phylogenetic position of North American freshwater fish tapeworms. Branches with support values &#x003C; 90% were collapsed. Modified from Brabec et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>). Asterisk indicates tapeworms non-native (introduced) to North America.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-12-1661118-g003.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Phylogenetic tree diagram displaying the classification of Bothriocephalidea families. The taxa are organized under three main groups: Bothriocephalidae, Echinophallidae, and Triaenophoridae. Symbols indicate North American and freshwater taxa. An image of the scolex of bothriocephalidean tapeworm (in green color) is shown on the left.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The order appears to be monophyletic, but consists of non-monophyletic families. The family Bothriocephalidae forms the most derived lineage of the order, with a single freshwater clade I that includes North American taxa, currently classified in <italic>Bothriocestus</italic>, as well as the invasive Asian fish tapeworm, <italic>Schyzocotyle acheilognathi</italic> (syn. <italic>Bothriocephalus acheilognathi</italic>), which is of major veterinary and ecological importance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">48</xref>). Other North American genera (<italic>Eubothrium</italic> and <italic>Triaenophorus</italic>) belong to the most basal, but non-monophyletic family Triaenophoridae with Holarctic distribution of many freshwater taxa, with the exception of the North American endemic genus <italic>Marsipometra</italic>, <italic>Eubothrium tulipai</italic> from the northern pikeminnow <italic>Ptychocheilus oregonensis</italic> and <italic>Triaenophorus stizostedionis</italic> from the walleye <italic>Sander vitreus</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Caryophyllidea</title>
<p>Molecular phylogenetic analyses of the Caryophyllidea (and also the Proteocephalidae &#x2013; see below) do not support traditional taxonomic significance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>). It was based on the position of the reproductive organs (testes, ovary, vitelline follicles and uterus) in relation to the internal longitudinal musculature, which appears to be homoplastic in both groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>).</p>
<p>As a result, Scholz et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">49</xref>) reorganized the classification of the Caryophyllidea at the family level. Although all existing families remained valid, their composition was significantly changed to reflect the assumed phylogenetic relationships. Most endemic Nearctic taxa are currently placed in the monophyletic family Capingentidae, which represents a relatively recent radiation in North America, including the formation of numerous scolex types and the presence of an external seminal vesicle in most taxa (which is never present in other families). The remaining species belong to a largely Palaearctic group forming the family Caryophyllaeidae. With one exception (<italic>Caryophyllaeides fennica</italic>), all species of this family occurring in North America are invasive and were introduced to America with the common carp (<italic>Cyprinus carpio</italic>), which is not native to North America.</p>
<p>The North American taxa (family Capingentidae) are related to those of the Caryophyllaeidae, which occur in the cypriniforms (Cyprinoidei and Cobitoidei) and almost exclusively in the Palaearctic (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">49</xref>). Interestingly, two species from the native Nearctic leuciscids, <italic>Edlintonia ptychocheila</italic> from the Northern pikeminnow and <italic>Pliovitellaria wisconsinensis</italic> from the golden shiner <italic>Notemigonus crysoleucas</italic>, are the most basal taxa of the North American species of the Capingentidae, which may indicate a host switch in their ancestors from cyprinoids to suckers (Catostomidae) and a subsequent radiation in these hosts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">49</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Simplified phylogenetic tree of the Bothriocephalidea inferred from partial 28S rDNA sequences showing the phylogenetic position of North American freshwater fish tapeworms. Branches with support values &#x003C; 90% were collapsed. Modified from Brabec et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>). Asterisk indicates tapeworms non-non-native (introduced) to North America.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-12-1661118-g004.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Phylogenetic tree diagram of the order Caryophyllidea, highlighting three families: Capingentidae, Caryophyllidae, and Lytocestidae. The tree shows relationships between genera such as Isoglaridacris, Khawia, and Lytocestus. Taxa that occur in North America are indicated by a silhouettes of this continent and an inset shows a magnified view of a tapeworm scolex.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Proteocephalidae (Onchoproteocephalidea I)</title>
<p>Similar to the Caryophyllidea, the previous classification was largely artificial and did not correspond to the actual relationships of the individual groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>). Molecular phylogenetic studies have not supported the existing subfamilies, most of which are not monophyletic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">50</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>). The most species-rich genera, including <italic>Proteocephalus</italic> with species that parasitise freshwater fishes in North America, are polyphyletic, and form several distantly related lineages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>).</p>
<p>The North American fish proteocephalids have been divided into two subfamilies, the Proteocephalinae (species of &#x2018;<italic>Proteocephalus</italic>&#x2019;), which are characterized by a simple scolex, and the Corallobothriinae, which possess a metascolex, including tapeworms of Nearctic catfishes (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>). The metascolex is the posterior part of a divided scolex consisting of folds of tissue that generally enclose or conceal the suckers [see (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>)]. Although the presence of a metascolex has long been used for classification, recent molecular studies show that it is a homoplastic feature that has evolved multiple times independently (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">50</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>). Therefore, the North American &#x2018;Corallobothriinae&#x2019; were transferred to a new subfamily, Essexiellinae, by Scholz et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>).</p>
<p>The North American members of the family Proteocephalidae currently belong to at least five different lineages [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>; see also Figures 4&#x2013;6 in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">52</xref>)]:</p>
<list list-type="order">
<list-item><p><italic>Proteocephalus</italic> species-aggregate (= &#x2018;true&#x2019; <italic>Proteocephalus</italic>), corresponding to clade F of de Chambrier et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">53</xref>);</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Essexiellinae in the ictalurids, i.e., the tapeworms of the genera <italic>Corallotaenia</italic>, <italic>Essexiella</italic> and <italic>Megathylacoides</italic>, corresponding to clade I of de Chambrier et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>); the two clades mentioned belong to the relatively basal groups of the Proteocephalidae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>);</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><italic>Cordicestus</italic> in gars (Lepisosteidae), which belongs to clade D, which is part of the large and unresolved &#x201C;Neotropical fish&#x201D; clade D of de Chambrier et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>) [see (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>)];</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><italic>Laruella</italic> in the bowfins (Amiidae), which also belongs to clade D of de Chambrier et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>);</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><italic>Proteocephalus ambloplitis</italic> in bass (Centrarchidae), which also belongs to clade D of de Chambrier et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>);</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><italic>Monticellia ophisterni</italic> in obscure swamp eel (Synbranchiformes) from Neotropical Mexico, which also belongs to clade D (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p></list-item>
</list>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Simplified phylogenetic tree of the Proteocephalidae from partial 28S rDNA sequences showing the phylogenetic position of North American freshwater fish tapeworms. Branches with support values &#x003C;90% were collapsed.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-12-1661118-g005.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Proteocephalidae showing North American taxa and the Neotropical clade. It details taxa such as Proteocephalus ambloplitis, Laruella, and more. An image of a tapeworm head is included. Groups that occur in North America are indicated by a silhouettes of this continent.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The phylogenetic position of <italic>Testudotaenia testudo</italic>, a parasite of turtles and possibly accidentally found in bowfin, is not clear (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">54</xref>).</p>
<p>Interestingly, the oldest, relict fishes such as gars (Lepisosteiformes) and bowfin (Amiiformes), are definitive hosts of relatively recently evolved tapeworms, while the most recently evolved teleosts such as centrarchids and percids harbor tapeworms belonging to relatively basal Proteocephalidae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>). This indicates several host switches of the Nearctic proteocephalids and their ancestors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Small cestode orders</title>
<p>Recent molecular phylogenetic studies confirmed the monophyly and validity of all three small cestode orders (Amphilinidea, Haplobothriidea and Spathebothriidea) found in North American freshwater fishes, as circumscribed by Khalil et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">55</xref>). Phylogenetic studies confirmed the basal position of the monozoic, non-strobilised Amphilinidea, which is one of the two earliest diverging orders of tapeworms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">45</xref>). Overall, these three small orders &#x2013; possibly due to their low veterinary importance and small number of species &#x2013; remain poorly studied and require future investigation. No further changes have been made to the classification, with the exception of new molecular data and revision of the Spathebothriidea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">41</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>4</label>
<title>Parasite&#x2013;host associations (host specificity)</title>
<p>Adequate knowledge of the host range of parasites, i.e., host specificity, is crucial for ecological, epidemiological and evolutionary implications. Based on published data, particularly those compiled by Hoffman (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>), a relatively broad host specificity has been assumed for many freshwater fish tapeworms in North America. However, a critical review of the host specificity of tapeworms of North American freshwater fish allowed their categorization into one of five groups according to the range of host specificity: (i) 59 species, i.e., 45%, are strict specialists (they live in only one host species); (ii) 36 species (28%) are congeneric specialists (they live in several host species of the same genus); (iii) 24 species (18%) are suprageneric specialists (they live in species of several closely related genera); (iv) 7 species (6%) are low generalist (they live in hosts of different, not closely related genera); and (v) 4 species (3%) high generalist (they live in hosts of unrelated fish orders or suborders) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>).</p>
<p>It is evident that the vast majority of North American freshwater fish tapeworms exhibit narrow host specificity, with almost three quarters specializing in a single host species or host genus. In contrast, none of the high generalists are endemic to North America. These high generalists are the invasive (probably Palaearctic) <italic>Schyzocotyle acheilognathi</italic> (Bothriocephalidea), the non-native (Palaearctic) <italic>Archigetes sieboldi</italic> (Caryophyllidea), and the Holarctic <italic>Cyathocephalus truncatus</italic> and <italic>Diplocotyle olrikii</italic> (both Spathebothriidea) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>).</p>
<p>Interestingly, species of all six orders are generally found in different groups of North American fish, with the Caryophyllidea in particular being the only tapeworms found in suckers (Catostomidae) (rare records of the invasive <italic>Schyzocotyle acheilognathi</italic> are not considered). It is relatively rare for adult tapeworms of different orders to be found in the same fish, such as the pike, which harbors <italic>Proteocephalus pinguis</italic> (Proteocephalidae), <italic>Triaenophorus</italic> spp. (Bothriocephalidea) and <italic>Cyathocephalus truncatus</italic> (Spathebothriidea), bowfin, which is the definitive host of <italic>Haplobothrium</italic> spp. (Haplobothriidea) and <italic>Laruella perplexa</italic> (Proteocephalidae), salmonids (hosts of species of three orders), and northern pikeminnow, which harbors <italic>Eubothrium tulipai</italic> (Bothriocephalidea) and <italic>P. torulosus</italic> (Proteocephalidae) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). Current knowledge of host specificity also reflects the intensity of sampling, as some popular sport fish such as centrarchids (smallmouth and largemouth bass) and walleye have been more intensively sampled for parasites compared to other fish of lesser commercial interest (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>).</p>
<p>The latest findings on the host specificity of the individual cestode orders are explained below (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>; see also <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Survey of host specificity of North American freshwater fish tapeworms.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-12-1661118-g006.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Three pie charts show host specificity categories for Bothriocephalidea, Caryophyllidea, and Proteocephalidae. Bothriocephalidea (n=15) is mostly strict specialists. Caryophyllidea (n=73) has a more diverse spread across categories, with a significant portion as strict specialists and suprageneric specialists. Proteocephalidae (n=36) is also dominated by strict specialists. The categories, depicted in blue tones, green, brown, and pink, represent strict specialist, congeneric specialist, suprageneric specialist, low generalist, and high generalist respectively.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Bothriocephalidea</title>
<p>This order includes 15 species with a variable range of host specificity: 7 strict specialists (e.g., the bothriocephalideans <italic>Eubothrium tulipai</italic> and <italic>Triaenophorus stizostedionis</italic>), 4 congeneric specialists, 3 suprageneric specialist and 1 high generalist (invasive, non-native <italic>Schyzocotyle acheilognathi</italic>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>; see also <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>Bothriocestus cuspidatus</italic> has been reported from 33 species of freshwater fishes from 13 families in 12 orders (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>). However, Choudhury and Scholz (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>) showed that <italic>B. cuspidatus</italic> does not exhibit such broad host specificity. Instead, several species specialized on their own definitive hosts were grouped together as <italic>B. cuspidatus</italic>; they are congeneric or suprageneric specialists (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>). Several hosts have been reported based on immature or juvenile tapeworms that cannot be reliably identified by morphology alone.</p>
<p><italic>Schyzocotyle acheilognathi</italic>, commonly known as Asian fish tapeworm, is a highly invasive cestode that infects a wide range of freshwater fish (&#x003E; 300 species), especially cyprinoids (minnows in North America) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">56</xref>). The parasite poses a significant threat to aquaculture and the biodiversity of native fish worldwide, including North America (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">57</xref>). It is most pathogenic in newly acquired host species, which appears to be the case in Australia, Europe and North America (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">58</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">59</xref>). The species was transferred to genus <italic>Schyzocotyle</italic>, based on a molecular phylogenetic study by Brabec et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>). The two species of this resurrected genus are characterized by a heart-shaped scolex with narrow, deep bothria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">57</xref>).</p>
<p>The North American <italic>Eubothrium</italic> species have very different host patterns. The two species most commonly parasitising salmonids, <italic>Eubothrium crassum</italic> and <italic>E. salvelini</italic>, were reported by Hoffman (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>) from at least 16 fish species from different families and orders. However, <italic>E. crassum</italic> mainly infects trout and salmon (<italic>Salmo</italic> spp.), while <italic>E. salvelini</italic> is typically associated with charr (<italic>Salvelinus</italic> spp.) and whitefish (<italic>Coregonus</italic> spp.). However, both species have been detected in rainbow trout (<italic>Oncorhynchus mykiss</italic>) in Europe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">60</xref>), and this may also be the case in other Pacific salmon of the genus <italic>Oncorhynchus</italic>, although this remains to be confirmed. In contrast, the two remaining <italic>Eubothrium</italic> species in North American freshwater fishes, <italic>E. rugosum</italic> from the burbot, <italic>Lota lota</italic>, and <italic>E. tulipai</italic>, from the northern pikeminnow, are strict specialists [(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">61</xref>); <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>].</p>
<p>There are numerous records of bothriocephalideans in atypical or unusual fish hosts [see (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>)], but these should be examined critically as they are likely accidental infections or postcyclic parasitism.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Caryophyllidea</title>
<p>The Caryophyllidea comprise 73 species, the vast majority of which exhibit narrow host specificity: 29 strict specialists (e.g., six <italic>Isoglaridacris</italic> species, five <italic>Biacetabulum</italic> species and all three <italic>Penarchigetes</italic> species), 18 congeneric specialists, 18 suprageneric specialists, 7 low generalists and 1 high generalist (<italic>Archigetes sieboldi</italic> in the Cypriniformes and Atheriniformes) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). The first two categories with the narrowest host specificity (tapeworms living in a single host species or genus) account for almost two thirds (64%) of all Caryophyllidea in North American freshwater fish (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
<p>In contrast, some species of <italic>Promonobothrium</italic> and <italic>Pseudoglaridacris</italic> have a broader range of definitive hosts and are found in fish of different genera or tribes, but rarely in fish of different subfamilies (Catostominae versus Ictiobinae) [(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>); <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>].</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Proteocephalidae (Onchoproteocephalidea I)</title>
<p>Their host specificity is not sufficiently known, mainly because of the persisting taxonomic problems in this group and the existence of numerous unconfirmed reports of atypical or dubious hosts. The present analysis shows that of the 36 species of Proteocephalidae, 20 are strict specialists, 13 are congeneric specialists and 3 are suprageneric specialists. No species was categorized as low or high generalist (see <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). Regarding the proportion of species in the category with the highest host specificity (strict specialist), more than half (56%) of the Proteocephalidae belong to this category (compared to 50% in the Bothriocephalidea, albeit with a low total number of species, and 40% in the Caryophyllidea) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
<p>Although recent studies have provided new data on the actual host specificity of many species, there are still large gaps (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>). An example of this is the so-called bass tapeworm, <italic>Proteocephalus ambloplitis</italic>, adults of which have been reported from a number of phylogenetically distant fish groups, notably bass, bowfin and gars. However, it appears that at least two species, including <italic>P. australis</italic> from gars, have been confused with <italic>P. ambloplitis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>). The same is true for metacestodes with a large apical glandular organ, which have been consistently (and automatically) identified as <italic>P. ambloplitis</italic> and are found in a wide range of numerous fish groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>). However, they actually belong to two or more different species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">62</xref>).</p>
<p>Nevertheless, most species of the Proteocephalidae appear to have a narrow host specificity as tapeworms of other orders, including several strict specialists such as species of the <italic>Proteocephalus</italic> species-aggregate of sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae), American yellow perch (<italic>Perca flavescens</italic>) and cavefish (Amblyopsidae) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">34</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">53</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>Laruella perplexa</italic> is a specific parasite of bowfin and has been morphologically and genetically characterized, albeit with a relatively complex genetic structure of isolates from different parts of North America (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>). Therefore, the presence of <italic>L. perplexa</italic> (or another closely related and morphologically similar species) in the two recently distinguished bowfin species [see (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">42</xref>)] should be confirmed.</p>
<p>A recent study of tapeworms of gars (Lepisosteidae), ancient and relict group of fish, confirms a narrow host specificity and restricted distribution of these proteocephalids, with closely related species occurring in different zoogeographical regions, i.e., Nearctic and Neotropical (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Small cestode orders</title>
<p><italic>Amphilina japonica</italic> (syn. <italic>A. bipunctata</italic>) (Amphilinidea), the only Amphilinidea from North America, is a specialist and occurs in the body cavity of the white sturgeon, <italic>Acipenser transmontanus</italic> in North America and of <italic>Sinosturio mikadoi</italic> in Japan. However, molecular data are still lacking to confirm the validity of this species, as it closely resembles <italic>A. foliacea</italic> from Eurasian sturgeons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">63</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>Haplobothrium globuliforme</italic> (Haplobothriidea) is a typical parasite of bowfin but has also been reported from the American eel, <italic>Anguilla rostrata</italic>. The latter fish was most likely only an accidental or postcyclic host. Similarly, a very rare <italic>H. bistrobilae</italic>, the validity of which remains to be confirmed, has been found in <italic>A. calva</italic> and in brown bullhead, <italic>Ameiurus nebulosus</italic>, although the latter host is questionable.</p>
<p>Two species of the relict order Spathebothriidea [see (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">41</xref>)] have a relatively broad spectrum of definitive hosts. <italic>Bothrimonus sturionis</italic>, a parasite of sturgeons (Acipenseridae), has been reported from 13 other fish hosts, including species from three salmonid genera, in Canada (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>). However, these reports are most likely a confusion with the morphologically similar <italic>Diplocotyle olrikii</italic> from marine and anadromous fish, as members of the genus <italic>Bothrimonus</italic> appear to be specific parasites of sturgeons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">41</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">64</xref>). The Holarctic <italic>Cyathocephalus truncatus</italic> was found in 16 species from six orders. With the exception of <italic>B. sturionis</italic>, the North American freshwater species of the order Spathebothriidea are high generalists.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>5</label>
<title>Zoogeography</title>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>5.1</label>
<title>Endemism of North American fish tapeworms</title>
<p>The tapeworm fauna of the freshwater fishes of North America is unique and peculiar, with a high degree of endemism (4/5 of the species &#x2013; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Nearctic elements dominate (96 species, i.e., 79%), with a small proportion of Holarctic taxa (15, i.e., 12%) and a negligible number of Neotropical taxa (5 in Mexico, i.e., 4%) and species introduced to North America with their non-native fish hosts, in particular the common carp (6, i.e., 5% &#x2013; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), which harbors five tapeworm species in North America (1 of the Bothriocephalidea, 4 of the Caryophyllidea).</p>
<p>The only species of Caryophyllidea with a circumboreal distribution, <italic>Caryophyllaeides fennica</italic>, was recently found by Oros et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">65</xref>) in the chiselmouth <italic>Acrocheilus alutaceus</italic>, an endemic cyprinid in the northwestern Nearctic (Oregon). A very low genetic divergence between <italic>C. fennica</italic> representatives from the Palaearctic and the Nearctic indicates a relatively recent colonization of the Nearctic by this cestode across the Beringian land bridge (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">65</xref>).</p>
<p>There are at least 14 species (only 11% of all species) with a Holarctic distribution, namely <italic>Amphilina japonica</italic> (Amphilinidea), <italic>Bothriocestus claviceps</italic>, <italic>Eubothrium crassum</italic>, <italic>E. rugosum</italic>, <italic>E. salvelini</italic>, <italic>Triaenophorus crassus</italic>, <italic>T. nodulosus</italic> (Bothriocephalidea), <italic>Proteocephalus ambiguus</italic>, <italic>P. filicollis</italic>, <italic>P. macrocephalus</italic>, <italic>P. tetrastomus</italic>, <italic>P. torulosus</italic> (Proteocephalidae), <italic>Cyathocephalus truncatus</italic> and <italic>Diplocotyle olrikii</italic> (Spathebothriidea) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">66</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">67</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>5.2</label>
<title>Distribution in North America</title>
<p>The vast majority of species occur in the USA (121 species), while less than half of the species diversity was found in Canada (58 species) and Mexico (14 species), including nine species in the Nearctic part of the country and only five Neotropical taxa (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>).</p>
<p>As far as the main hydrological regions of North America are concerned, it is not possible to provide detailed and reliable data, as there are numerous misidentifications of individual records. It can roughly be summarized that the Bothriocephalidea and the Proteocephalidae have a similar species diversity in Canada and the USA, with the number of species increasing slightly from Canada toward the south of the USA, while very few species of these orders have been reported from Mexico. In the Caryophyllidea, there is a clear increase in species diversity from Canada (20 species) toward the south and south-east of the USA with the highest number of species. However, the freshwater fish tapeworms in Canada, the southern USA and Mexico are still little studied despite the high diversity of fish.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>6</label>
<title>Metacestodes (tapeworm larvae)</title>
<p>Metacestodes can also be found common in freshwater fish, and some species can be harmful to their fish hosts, particularly the plerocercoids that migrate through their tissues and internal organs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">59</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">68</xref>). For example, plerocercoids of <italic>Dibothriocephalus</italic> spp. encapsulate in the viscera or body cavity and can cause compression and displacement of pancreatic and testicular tissue in heavily infected hosts. They can also cause liver necrosis, necrosis of the myofibrils near the parasites and hypertrophy of the connective tissue. Mortality of small fish due to hemorrhage may be caused by migrating plerocercoids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">59</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68 ref69 ref70 ref71">68&#x2013;71</xref>).</p>
<p>Tapeworm larvae of the following five orders parasitise in North American freshwater fish: Bothriocephalidea, Diphyllobothriidea, Haplobothriidea, Proteocephalidae and Cyclophyllidea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>). The most important are plerocercoids of the genera Dibothriocephalus (formerly in Diphyllobothrium), Triaenophorus and Proteocephalus ambloplitis (sensu stricto), which can invade the body cavity or internal organs including the musculature of fish and encapsulate in the viscera or muscles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">49</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">69</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">70</xref>).</p>
<p>Cestode larvae can be localized in different organs, i.e., in the abdominal cavity (larvae of <italic>Dibothriocephalus</italic>, <italic>Ligula</italic> and <italic>Schistocephalus</italic>; all Diphyllobothriidea), in the liver and muscles (e.g., larvae of <italic>Triaenophorus</italic>; Bothriocephalidea), in the gall bladder (<italic>Valipora</italic>) and in the liver (<italic>Paradilepis</italic>; both Cyclophyllidea) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">68</xref>). Metacestodes can also be very numerous and their correct species identification is important for epizootiological, ecological and faunistic studies.</p>
<p>Metacestodes generally do not have genital organs (or only their primordia), which are crucial for species identification. In addition, their scolex may differ from that of the adult worms, making their reliable identification difficult or impossible, as does the simultaneous occurrence of larvae of different species in the same hosts or even in the same organs of these hosts (e.g., <italic>Dibothriocephalus dendriticus</italic> and <italic>D. ditremus</italic>). As a result, many tapeworms have been misidentified, such as the metacestodes of <italic>Protepocephalus australis</italic> from gars as <italic>P. ambloplitis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>). However, correct species identification is important from an epizootiological or epidemiological point of view mainly for zoonotic parasites such as some Diphyllobothriidea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">72</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition, the records of adult tapeworms and metacestodes in the older literature, including the monograph by Hoffman (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>), cannot always be distinguished, as they are reported exclusively as parasite&#x2013;host records with no indication of developmental stage or maturity. Therefore, the information in the literature should be treated with caution, especially with regard to the actual occurrence of some larvae in numerous fish hosts.</p>
<p>The application of molecular approaches (DNA barcoding or the use of microsatellites in the case of morphologically indistinguishable metacestodes occurring in one and the same fish &#x2013; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">73</xref>) seems to have solved most of the above-mentioned problems in the reliable identification of metacestodes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">73</xref>). However, this approach cannot be applied when the number of metacestodes is high, as it is costly, time-consuming and requires appropriate facilities.</p>
<p>Most conspicuous are plerocercoids of the genera <italic>Ligula</italic> and <italic>Schistocephalus</italic> (Diphyllobothriidea), which grow to large size in the body cavity of cypriniforms and sticklebacks and can adversely affect the growth, sexual maturation and motility of heavily infected fish (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">58</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">71</xref>). Plerocercoids of some species of the genus <italic>Dibothriocephalus</italic> (mainly <italic>D. nihonkaiensis</italic> in Pacific salmon and <italic>D. latus</italic> in pike, perch and burbot) are a source of infection for humans and cause diphyllobothriosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">72</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<label>7</label>
<title>Conclusion and avenues for future research</title>
<p>Since 2000, important taxonomic updates have been made, particularly in the Caryophyllidea, Proteocephalidae and Bothriocephalidea, and some knowledge gaps have been filled, particularly through a more detailed assessment of host specificity and distribution. The importance of molecular insights in studies is beyond question, as evidenced by broad molecular phylogenies of the major groups of fish tapeworms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">43</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>). New data on species diversity, host&#x2013;parasite relationships and distribution will contribute to more reliable ecosystem monitoring, but also to fisheries management (identification of potentially pathogenic taxa, including metacestodes) or zoonotic risk, which is mainly limited to broad fish tapeworms (Diphyllobothriidea) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">72</xref>).</p>
<p>The key factor that has enabled this progress in our understanding of the species composition and phylogenetic relationships is integrative taxonomy, i.e., the combination of morphological, molecular and ecological data, including voucher specimens of molecular samples, i.e., holo- and paragenophores [see (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">74</xref>)]. However, a prerequisite for obtaining a broad range of information required for taxonomic, evolutionary and biogeographical conclusions is the presence of properly fixed and adequately processed specimens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">75</xref>). Much valuable material has been lost through the use of inappropriate methods, such as parasitological examination of dead hosts leading to rapid decomposition of tapeworms, fixation under pressure causing unnatural deformation and expansion, or the use of cold (unheated) fixatives leading to unnatural contraction and deformation of specimens.</p>
<p>For future ecological and zoogeographical analyses, it is essential to critically examine the actual host specificity of individual taxa, preferably by genotyping and depositing specimens from atypical or unusual hosts. The use of molecular markers (DNA genotyping) is unavoidable, especially for metacestodes. Regarding suitable molecular markers, it is recommended to use both nuclear (28S rDNA or LSU) and mitochondrial (<italic>cox</italic>1) gene sequences for genotyping. Genomic data could be used for the development of future tools for diagnosis and epidemiological surveys, including environmental DNA screening (eDNA) for presence of life cycle stages of broad tapeworms in the environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">72</xref>).</p>
<p>The top priority for future research is undoubtedly the integration of different methodological approaches and the application of appropriate methods of sample processing and analysis. Below are some more specific points that are important for further understanding the biodiversity, relationships and distribution of tapeworms of North American freshwater fishes, but also for ecosystem monitoring, fisheries management and zoonotic risk assessment.</p>
<list list-type="order">
<list-item><p>International cooperation, including the participation of experts in individual groups of fish tapeworms in field surveys, processing of samples and their analysis in the laboratory.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Targeted sampling of insufficiently studied hosts, in insufficiently studied regions and in areas where new species are suspected, e.g., the southern Mississippi basin and the Pascagoula River.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Only fresh fish hosts should be examined; parasite samples from frozen hosts are only suitable for DNA genotyping, but not for their morphological evaluation.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>The use of appropriate methods for sample processing, especially heat fixation of fresh parasite material (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">75</xref>).</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Vouchering specimens (especially those used for molecular studies) and their deposition in recognized parasitological collections and museums (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">74</xref>).</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>The application of integrative taxonomy methods, including genotyping of specimens.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Critical review of records of parasites from unusual or atypical fish hosts to obtain a more reliable assessment of actual host specificity; this requires the deposition of voucher specimens in parasitological collections for verification.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>The transfer of taxonomic knowledge to a new generation of parasitologists, as expertise in parasite identification is currently being lost (courses or workshops to promote integrative taxonomy as a background for other studies organised).</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Genotyping of fish hosts from taxonomically difficult groups (e.g., salmonids or cypriniforms).</p></list-item>
</list>
<p>With regard to the individual orders of fish tapeworms, the tasks considered the most difficult by the present authors are listed in order to promote future systematic and ecological research, with the greatest gaps still existing in the Proteocephalidae and Caryophyllidea:</p>
<p>Bothriocephalidea: Current species diversity of <italic>Bothriocestus</italic> and <italic>Bothriocephalus</italic>, and host specificity of <italic>Eubothrium</italic> tapeworms from salmonids, including reliable and easy identification of their plerocercoids [see e.g., (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">73</xref>)].</p>
<p>Caryophyllidea: Revision of the tapeworms parasitising <italic>Catostomus</italic> suckers in western North America, especially those of <italic>Glaridacris</italic>, and a critical assessment of the diversity and host specificity of the tapeworms of redhorse (<italic>Moxostoma</italic> spp.), buffalo fish (<italic>Ictiobus</italic>) and chubsucker (<italic>Erimyzon</italic>).</p>
<p>Proteocephalidae: Better understanding of species diversity in salmonids, revision of the subfamily Essexiellinae of ictalurids, in particular circumscription of <italic>Corallotaenia</italic> of bullheads (<italic>Ameiurus</italic>), phylogenetic relationships of species from cavefish and clarification of species diversity of <italic>Laruella</italic> in the recently split species of bowfins.</p>
<p>Small cestode orders: Species composition of <italic>Haplobothrium</italic>, with emphasis on its occurrence in the recently resurrected <italic>Amia ocellicauda</italic>. The validity of <italic>Amphilina japonica</italic> and <italic>Bothrimonus sturionis</italic> from sturgeons should also be confirmed by molecular methods.</p>
<p>A major challenge for the near future is also to compile the available data into comprehensive accounts, including monographs and taxonomic revisions with keys to species identification, which will serve as a solid basis for ecological and evolutionary studies. The life cycles of most fish tapeworms in North America are still poorly understood, and data on their impact on fish hosts are inadequate. Despite these gaps and limited knowledge, North American freshwater fish tapeworms undoubtedly provide valuable models for the study of host specificity, coevolution and phylogenetic relationships. Some of them, including invasive species such as the Asian fish tapeworm, are also important for fisheries and conservation biology, and broad fish tapeworms include potentially zoonotic taxa. Future efforts should focus on integrative taxonomic approaches, international collaboration and applied research linking parasite diversity to ecosystem and fish health.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec22">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec23">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>Ethical approval was not required for the study involving animals in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements because all fish hosts came from nature.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec24">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>TS: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing &#x2013; original draft. RK: Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec25">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (projects LTAUSA 18010 and LUAUS 23080) and Fulbright Commission (TS&#x2019;s stay in the USA in 2017).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>Two reviewers made very helpful and insightful suggestions that helped to significantly improve the quality of the manuscript. The authors are also indebted the editors of this special issue for the invitation to write this chapter. Numerous collaborators from the USA, in particularly Anindo Choudhury (St. Norbert College, Wisconsin), Chris T. McAllister (Northeast Texas Community College, Texas), Florian Reyda (State University of New York, Oneonta, New York), Stephen S. Curran and the late Robin M. Overstreet, (Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean Springs, Mississippi), Megan Bean, (Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Texas), and Isaure de Buron, (Charleston College, South Carolina), all USA, and the late John S. Mackiewicz, Albany, helped to organize field samples and/or provided tapeworms to the present authors. Mikul&#x00E1;&#x0161; Oros (Institute of Parasitology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovakia), participated in several field trips in the USA; together with Dalibor Uhrovi&#x010D; (Faculty of Science, P. J. &#x0160;af&#x00E1;rik University, Slovakia), he also participated in the taxonomic assessment of caryophyllidean tapeworms. The authors also thank the curators of the parasitological collections in Lincoln, Nebraska (G&#x00E1;bor Racz, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology Collection), Ottawa (Jean-Marc Gagnon, Canadian Museum of Nature) and Washington, D.C. (Anna J. Phillips, National Museum of Natural History). Camila Pantoja (Institute of Parasitology) helped with the preparation of phylogenetic trees.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec26">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec27">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec28">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec29">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1661118/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1661118/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.xls" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.ms-excel" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn1001"><p><sup>1</sup><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.fishbase.se/search.php" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.fishbase.se/search.php</ext-link>; (Accessed on July 1, 2025).</p></fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hoffman</surname><given-names>GL</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Parasites of North American freshwater fishes</source>. <edition>Second</edition> ed. <publisher-loc>Ithaca, New York: Comstock Publishing Associates</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Cornell University Press</publisher-name> (<year>1999</year>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Margolis</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arthur</surname><given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <article-title>Synopsis of the parasites of fishes of Canada</article-title>. <source>Bull. Fish Res Board Canada</source> <volume>199</volume>, 269 pp.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McDonald</surname><given-names>T. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Margolis</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <source>Synopsis of the parasites of fishes of Canada: Supplement (1978&#x2013;1993)</source>. <publisher-name>Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Ottawa</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>National Research Council of Canada</publisher-name>, <volume>122</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>265</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Parasites of freshwater fishes in North America: why so neglected?</article-title> <source>J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>100</volume>:<fpage>26</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1645/13-394.1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24147814</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Salgado-Maldonado</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Checklist of helminth parasites of freshwater fishes from Mexico</article-title>. <source>Zootaxa</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>1324</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>357</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11646/zootaxa.1324.1.1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38220602</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x0158;ehulkov&#x00E1;</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Francov&#x00E1;</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morand</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x0160;imkov&#x00E1;</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Diversity of monogeneans and tapeworms in cypriniform fishes across two continents</article-title>. <source>Int J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>50</volume>:<fpage>771</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.06.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caira</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holsinger</surname><given-names>KE</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>On a new index of host specificity</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Combes</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jourdane</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Taxonomy, ecology and evolution of metazoan parasites</source>. <publisher-loc>Perpignan, France</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Presses Universitaires de Perpignan</publisher-name> (<year>2003</year>)</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Euzet</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Combes</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Les probl&#x00E8;mes de l&#x2019;esp&#x00E8;ce chez les animaux parasites</article-title>. <source>M&#x00E9;m Soc Zool France</source>. (<year>1980</year>) <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>239</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>85</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Poulin</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mouillot</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Parasite specialization from a phylogenetic perspective: a new index of host specificity</article-title>. <source>Parasitology</source>. (<year>2003</year>) <volume>126</volume>:<fpage>473</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0031182003002993</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12793652</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caira</surname><given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barbeau</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>) Global Cestode Database. World Wide Web Electr. Publ. Available online at: <ext-link xlink:href="http://www.tapewormdb.uconn.edu" ext-link-type="uri">www.tapewormdb.uconn.edu</ext-link> (Accessed July 1, 2025).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reyda</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The <italic>Proteocephalus</italic> species-aggregate (Cestoda) in cyprinoids, pike, eel, smelt and cavefish of the Nearctic region (North America): diversity, host associations and distribution</article-title>. <source>Syst Parasitol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>98</volume>:<fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>75</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11230-021-09975-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33840001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Chambrier</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mariaux</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Redescription of <italic>Corallobothrium solidum</italic> (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea) and erection of a new genus, <italic>Essexiella</italic>, for tapeworms from channel catfish (Ictaluridae)</article-title>. <source>J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>97</volume>:<fpage>1142</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1645/GE-2705.1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Chambrier</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mariaux</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Onchoproteocephalidea I Caira, Jensen, Waeschenbach, Olson &#x0026; Littlewood, 2014</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Caira</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Planetary biodiversity inventory (2008&#x2013;2017): Tapeworms from vertebrate bowels of the earth</source>. <publisher-loc>Lawrence, KS, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University of Kansas, Natural History Museum</publisher-name> (<year>2017</year>). <fpage>251</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rego</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Order Proteocephalidea</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Khalil</surname><given-names>LF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bray</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Keys to the Cestode parasites of vertebrates</source>. <publisher-loc>Wallingford, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CAB International</publisher-name> (<year>1994</year>). <fpage>257</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Ex uno plures</italic>? Morphotype and lineage diversity of <italic>Bothriocephalus</italic> (Cestoda: Bothriocephalidea) in North American freshwater fishes</article-title>. <source>J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>106</volume>:<fpage>589</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>602</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1645/17-98</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32932521</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A revision of the species of <italic>Bothriocephalus</italic> Rudolphi, 1808 (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) parasitic in American freshwater fishes</article-title>. <source>Syst Parasitol</source>. (<year>1997</year>) <volume>36</volume>:<fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>107</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1005744010567</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40797221</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beuchel</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A new species of <italic>Bothriocephalus</italic> (Cestoda: Bothriocephalidae) from <italic>Lepomis</italic> spp. (Actinopterygii: Centrarchidae) in North America</article-title>. <source>J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>108</volume>:<fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1645/21-70</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35925593</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brabec</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waeschenbach</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Littlewood</surname><given-names>DTJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Molecular phylogeny of the Bothriocephalidea (Cestoda): molecular data challenge morphology-based classification</article-title>. <source>Int J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>45</volume>:<fpage>761</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpara.2015.05.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reyda</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Erection of <italic>Bothriocestus</italic> n. gen. (Cestoda: Bothriocephalidea) and redescription of <italic>Bothriocestus cuspidatus</italic> (Cooper, 1977) (syn. <italic>Bothriocephalus cuspidatus</italic>) from walleye, <italic>Sander vitreus</italic> (Perciformes: Percidae), in North America</article-title>. <source>J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>109</volume>:<fpage>322</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1645/22-99</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37490362</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mackiewicz</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Order Caryophyllidea van Beneden in Carus, 1863</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Khalil</surname><given-names>LF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bray</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Keys to the Cestode parasites of vertebrates</source>. <publisher-loc>Wallingford, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CAB International</publisher-name> (<year>1994</year>). <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oros</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Caryophyllidea van Beneden in Carus, 1863</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Caira</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Planetary biodiversity inventory (2008&#x2013;2017): Tapeworms from vertebrate bowels of the earth</source>. <publisher-loc>Lawrence, KS, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University of Kansas, Natural History Museum</publisher-name> (<year>2017</year>). <fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oros</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brabec</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A synoptic review of <italic>Promonobothrium</italic> Mackiewicz, 1968 (Cestoda: Caryophyllidea), parasites of suckers (Catostomidae) in North America, with description of two new species</article-title>. <source>Folia Parasitol</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>63</volume>:<fpage>008</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14411/fp.2016.008</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27080624</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oros</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Uhrovi&#x010D;</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A new classification of <italic>Glaridacris</italic> Cooper, 1920 (Cestoda: Caryophyllidea), parasites of suckers (Catostomidae) in North America, including erection of <italic>Pseudoglaridacris</italic> n. gen</article-title>. <source>J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>104</volume>:<fpage>60</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1645/17-58</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28902569</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oros</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brabec</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waeschenbach</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>New circumscription of freshwater fish parasites <italic>Monobothrium</italic> Diesing, 1863 and <italic>Promonobothrium</italic> Mackiewicz, 1968 (Cestoda: Caryophyllidea) using morphological and molecular evidence</article-title>. <source>J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>101</volume>:<fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1645/14-610.1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25259406</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uhrovi&#x010D;</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oros</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kudlai</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Molecular evidence of three closely related species of <italic>Biacetabulum</italic> Hunter, 1927 (Cestoda: Caryophyllidea): a case of recent speciation in different fish hosts (Catostomidae)?</article-title> <source>Parasitology</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>148</volume>:<fpage>1040</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0031182021000743</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33975665</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uhrovi&#x010D;</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oros</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kudlai</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Archigetes</italic> Leuckart, 1878 (Cestoda, Caryophyllidea): diversity of enigmatic fish tapeworms with monoxenic life cycles</article-title>. <source>Parasite</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>6</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/parasite/2022002</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35138246</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uhrovi&#x010D;</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oros</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reyda</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kudlai</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Redescription of <italic>Biacetabulum giganteum</italic> Hunter, 1929 (Cestoda: Caryophyllidea), description of two new, closely related species from suckers (Catostomidae) in North America, and a critical review of host specificity of species of <italic>Biacetabulum</italic> Hunter, 1927</article-title>. <source>Syst Biodivers</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>1062</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>79</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14772000.2021.1970649</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><label>28.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uhrovi&#x010D;</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pantoja</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kudlai</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Revision of <italic>Isoglaridacris</italic> (Cestoda: Caryophyllidea), parasites of suckers (Catostomidae) in North America: molecular phylogeny and description of four new species</article-title>. <source>Sci Rep</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>20551</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-025-02828-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40594038</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><label>29.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dutton</surname><given-names>HR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barger</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A new genus and species of caryophyllaeid (Cestode: Caryophyllidea) from spotted suckers, <italic>Minytrema melanops</italic> (Catostomidae), in the big thicket National Preserve, Texas, U.S.a.</article-title> <source>Comp Parasitol</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>81</volume>:<fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1654/4620.1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><label>30.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uhrovi&#x010D;</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kudlai</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oros</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Disentangling taxonomy of <italic>Biacetabulum</italic> (Cestoda, Caryophyllidea), parasites of catostomid fshes in North America: proposal of <italic>Megancestus</italic> gen. n. to accommodate <italic>B. carpiodi</italic></article-title>. <source>Parasitol Res</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>120</volume>:<fpage>1993</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2001</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00436-021-07188-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34021801</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><label>31.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bar&#x010D;&#x00E1;k</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waeschenbach</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAllister</surname><given-names>CT</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Tapeworms (Cestoda) of ictalurid catfishes (Siluriformes) in North America: redescription of type species of two genera and proposal of Essexiellinae n. subfam</article-title>. <source>J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>106</volume>:<fpage>444</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1645/20-12</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32294216</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><label>32.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Chambrier</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kysl&#x00ED;k</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Tapeworms (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) of the gars (Lepisosteidae), living fossils in America, including proposal of a new genus and a new species</article-title>. <source>Parasitol Int</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>102</volume>:<fpage>102916</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.parint.2024.102916</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38936764</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><label>33.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAllister</surname><given-names>CT</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A young parasite in an old fish host: a new genus for proteocephalid tapeworms (Cestoda) of bowfin (<italic>Amia calva</italic>) (Holostei: Amiiformes), and a revised list of its cestodes</article-title>. <source>Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijppaw.2022.04.002</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35572038</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><label>34.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nelson</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The <italic>Proteocephalus</italic> species-aggregate (Cestoda) in sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae) of the Nearctic region, including description of a new species from brook stickleback, <italic>Culaea inconstans</italic></article-title>. <source>Folia Parasitol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>67</volume>:<fpage>021</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14411/fp.2020.021</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32866947</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><label>35.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brabec</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gauthier</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Selz</surname><given-names>OM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knudsen</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bilat</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alvarez</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Testing the radiation cascade in postglacial radiations of whitefish and their parasites: founder events and host ecology drive parasite evolution</article-title>. <source>Evol Lett</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>706</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/evlett/qrae025</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39328289</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><label>36.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Chambrier</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brabec</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knudsen</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blasco-Costa</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Redescription of <italic>Proteocephalus fallax</italic> La Rue, 1911 (Cestoda) and a list of proteocephalid tapeworms of whitefish (<italic>Coregonus</italic> spp.)</article-title>. <source>Folia Parasitol</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>019</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14411/fp.2024.019</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39498539</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><label>37.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hanzelov&#x00E1;</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Species of <italic>Proteocephalus</italic> Weinland, 1858 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae), parasites of coregonid and salmonid fishes from North America: taxonomic reappraisal</article-title>. <source>J Parasitol</source>. (<year>1999</year>) <volume>85</volume>:<fpage>94</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/3285708</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10207371</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><label>38.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hanzelov&#x00E1;</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Tapeworms of the genus <italic>Proteocephalus</italic> Weinland, 1858 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae)</article-title> In: <source>Parasites of fishes in Europe</source>. <publisher-loc>Praha</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academia</publisher-name> (<year>1998</year>). <fpage>119</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><label>39.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brabec</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rochat</surname><given-names>EC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knudsen</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blasco-Costa</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Mining various genomic resources to resolve old alpha-taxonomy questions: a test of the species hypothesis of the <italic>Proteocephalus longicollis</italic> species complex (Cestoda: Platyhelminthes) from salmonid fishes</article-title>. <source>Int J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>53</volume>:<fpage>197</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpara.2022.12.005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36706803</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><label>40.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duvernoy</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Note sur un nouveau genre de ver intestinal, de la famille des T&#x00E9;nio&#x00EF;des, le Bothrimone de l&#x2019;esturgeon (<italic>Bothrimonus sturionis</italic>, Nob.)</article-title>. <source>Ann Sci Nat Zool</source>. (<year>1842</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><label>41.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pearson</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ditrich</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olson</surname><given-names>PD</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Spathebothriidea: survey of species, scolex and egg morphology, and interrelationships of a non-segmented, relictual tapeworm group (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda)</article-title>. <source>Folia Parasitol</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>61</volume>:<fpage>331</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14411/fp.2014.040</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25185404</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><label>42.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brownstein</surname><given-names>CD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Orr</surname><given-names>OD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hogue</surname><given-names>GM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tracy</surname><given-names>BH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pugh</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Hidden species diversity in an iconic living fossil vertebrate</article-title>. <source>Biol Lett</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>20220395</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rsbl.2022.0395</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><label>43.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caira</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waeschenbach</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olson</surname><given-names>PD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Littlewood</surname><given-names>DTJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Orders out of chaos &#x2013; molecular phylogenetics reveals the complexity of shark and stingray tapeworm relationships</article-title>. <source>Int J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>44</volume>:<fpage>55</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.10.004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24275646</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><label>44.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Waeschenbach</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Littlewood</surname><given-names>D. T. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>A molecular framework for the Cestoda</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source>Planetary biodiversity inventory (2008&#x2013;2017): Tapeworms from vertebrate bowels of the earth</source>, <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Caira</surname><given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (eds.). <publisher-loc>Lawrence, Kansas, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University of Kansas, Natural History Museum</publisher-name>. Special Publication No. 25, <fpage>431</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>451</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><label>45.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Waeschenbach</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Webster</surname><given-names>BL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Littlewood</surname><given-names>DTJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Adding resolution to ordinal level relationships of tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda) with large fragments of mtDNA</article-title>. <source>Mol Phylogenet Evol</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>63</volume>:<fpage>834</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ympev.2012.02.020</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22406529</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><label>46.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A digest of fish tapeworms</article-title>. <source>Vie Milieu</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>67</volume>:<fpage>43</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><label>47.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Fish tapeworms (Cestoda) in the molecular era: achievements, gaps &#x0026; prospects</article-title>. <source>Parasitology</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>149</volume>:<fpage>1876</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0031182022001202</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36004800</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><label>48.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Bothriocephalidea Kuchta, Scholz, Brabec &#x0026; Bray, 2008</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Caira</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Planetary biodiversity inventory (2008&#x2013;2017): Tapeworms from vertebrate bowels of the earth</source>. <publisher-loc>Lawrence, KS, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University of Kansas, Natural History Museum</publisher-name> (<year>2017</year>). <fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><label>49.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waeschenbach</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oros</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brabec</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Littlewood</surname><given-names>DTJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phylogenetic reconstruction of early diverging tapeworms (Cestoda: Caryophyllidea) reveals ancient radiations in vertebrate hosts and biogeographic regions</article-title>. <source>Int J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>51</volume>:<fpage>263</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.09.009</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33275944</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><label>50.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Chambrier</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zehnder</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vaucher</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mariaux</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The evolution of the Proteocephalidea (Platyhelminthes, Eucestoda) based on an enlarged molecular phylogeny, with comments on their uterine development</article-title>. <source>Syst Parasitol</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>57</volume>:<fpage>159</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><label>51.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Chambrier</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waeschenbach</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fisseha</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mariaux</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A large 28S rDNA-based phylogeny confirms the limitations of established morphological characters for classification of proteocephalidean tapeworms (Platyhelminthes, Cestoda)</article-title>. <source>ZooKeys</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>500</volume>:<fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/zookeys.500.9360</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25987870</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><label>52.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alves</surname><given-names>PV</given-names></name> <name><surname>da Silva</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Chambrier</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luque</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duchenko</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Machine learning models accurately predict clades of proteocephalidean tapeworms (Onchoproteocephalidea) based on host and biogeographical data</article-title>. <source>Cladistics</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>41</volume>:<fpage>264</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/cla.12610</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40047286</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><label>53.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Uhrov&#x00E1;</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brabec</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The <italic>Proteocephalus</italic> species-aggregate in freshwater centrarchid and percid fishes of the Nearctic region (North America)</article-title>. <source>J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>105</volume>:<fpage>798</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>812</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1645/19-89</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31657975</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><label>54.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Chambrier</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coquille</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mariaux</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tkach</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Redescription of <italic>Testudotaenia testudo</italic> (Magath, 1924) (Eucestoda: Proteocephalidea), a parasite of <italic>Apalone spinifera</italic> (Le Sueur) (Reptilia: Trionychidae) and <italic>Amia calva</italic> L. (Pisces: Amiidae) in North America and erection of the Testudotaeniinae n. subfam</article-title>. <source>Syst Parasitol</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>73</volume>:<fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11230-009-9178-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19337859</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><label>55.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Khalil</surname><given-names>LF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bray</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group> eds. <source>Keys to the cestode parasites of vertebrates</source>. <publisher-loc>Wallingford, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CAB International</publisher-name> (<year>1994</year>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><label>56.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Asian fish tapeworm: the most successful invasive parasite in freshwaters</article-title>. <source>Trends Parasitol</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>34</volume>:<fpage>511</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pt.2018.03.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29580663</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><label>57.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Chapter 18. <italic>Bothriocephalus achelognathi</italic></article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Woo</surname><given-names>PTK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buchmann</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Fish parasites. Pathobiology and protection</source>. <publisher-loc>Wallingford, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CAB International</publisher-name> (<year>2012</year>). <fpage>282</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>97</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><label>58.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dove</surname><given-names>ADM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cribb</surname><given-names>TH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mockler</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lintermans</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The Asian fish tapeworm, <italic>Bothriocephalus acheilognathi</italic>, in Australian freshwater fishes</article-title>. <source>Mar Freshw Res</source>. (<year>1997</year>) <volume>48</volume>:<fpage>181</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/MF96069</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><label>59.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Parasitic worms of fish</source>. <publisher-loc>London and Bristol, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Taylor and Francis</publisher-name> (<year>1994</year>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><label>60.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shinn</surname><given-names>AP</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x0160;n&#x00E1;bel</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hanzelov&#x00E1;</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Host specificity and geographical distribution of <italic>Eubothrium</italic> tapeworms (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) in European salmonid fish</article-title>. <source>J Helminthol</source>. (<year>2003</year>) <volume>77</volume>:<fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1079/JOH2003188</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><label>61.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bray</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Revision of the order Bothriocephalidea Kuchta, Scholz, Brabec &#x0026; Bray, 2008 (Eucestoda) with amended generic diagnoses and keys to families and genera</article-title>. <source>Syst Parasitol</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>81</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>136</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11230-008-9153-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><label>62.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luth</surname><given-names>K. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>) Scale-dependent variation in molecular and ecological patterns of infection for endohelminths from centrarchiid fishes. PhD thesis, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 356 pp.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><label>63.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Amphilinidea Poche, 1922</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Caira</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Planetary biodiversity inventory (2008&#x2013;2017): Tapeworms from vertebrate bowels of the earth</source>. <publisher-loc>Lawrence, Kansas, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University of Kansas, Natural History Museum</publisher-name> (<year>2017</year>). <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><label>64.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Spathebothriidea Wardle &#x0026; McLeod, 1952</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Caira</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Planetary biodiversity inventory (2008&#x2013;2017): Tapeworms from vertebrate bowels of the earth</source>. <publisher-loc>Lawrence, KS, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University of Kansas, Natural History Museum</publisher-name> (<year>2017</year>). <fpage>349</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><label>65.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oros</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A common Eurasian fish tapeworm, <italic>Caryophyllaeides fennica</italic> (Cestoda) in western North America: further evidence of &#x2018;amphi-pacific&#x2019; vicariance in freshwater fish parasites</article-title>. <source>J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>103</volume>:<fpage>486</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>96</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1645/16-80</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28594283</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><label>66.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dubinina</surname><given-names>M. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <source>Parasitic Worms of the class Amphilinida (Platyhelminthes)</source>. <publisher-loc>Leningrad, Russia</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Nauka</publisher-name>. (In Russian.)</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref67"><label>67.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vl&#x010D;kov&#x00E1;</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poddubnaya</surname><given-names>LG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gustinelli</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dzika</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Invalidity of three Palaearctic species of <italic>Triaenophorus</italic> tapeworms (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea): evidence from morphometric analysis of scolex hooks</article-title>. <source>Folia Parasitol</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>54</volume>:<fpage>34</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14411/fp.2007.005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17441435</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref68"><label>68.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oros</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Tapeworms as pathogens of fish: a review</article-title>. <source>J Fish Dis</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>44</volume>:<fpage>1883</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>900</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jfd.13526</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34529835</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref69"><label>69.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dick</surname><given-names>T. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chambers</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Isinguzo</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>) <article-title>Cestoidea (phylum Platyhelminthes)</article-title> <source>Fish diseases and disorders</source> Volume 1 <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Woo</surname><given-names>P. T. K.</given-names></name></person-group> <publisher-loc>Wallingford, UK</publisher-loc> <publisher-name>CAB International</publisher-name> <fpage>391</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>416</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref70"><label>70.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuperman</surname><given-names>B. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <source>Tapeworms of the genus <italic>Triaenophorus</italic>, parasites of fish. Experimental systematics, ecology</source>. <publisher-loc>Leningrad, Russia</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Nauka</publisher-name>. (In Russian.)</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref71"><label>71.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dubinina</surname><given-names>MN</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Tapeworms (Cestoda, Ligulidae) of the fauna of the USSR</source>. <publisher-loc>New Delhi, India</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Amerind Publishing Company</publisher-name> (<year>1980</year>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref72"><label>72.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuchta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brabec</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Broad tapeworms (Diphyllobothriidae), parasites of wildlife and humans: recent progress and future challenges</article-title>. <source>Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>359</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>69</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.02.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31341771</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref73"><label>73.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kr&#x00E1;lov&#x00E1;-Hromadov&#x00E1;</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x010C;isovsk&#x00E1; Bazsalovicsov&#x00E1;</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dinisov&#x00E1;</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sk&#x00ED;rnisson</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Occurrence and the first molecular genotyping of <italic>Dibothriocephalus dendriticus</italic> and <italic>Dibothriocephalus ditremus</italic> (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidea) in salmonids from Iceland</article-title>. <source>Curr Res Parasitol Vector-Borne Dis</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>100301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crpvbd.2025.100301</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref74"><label>74.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pleijel</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jondelius</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Norlinder</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nygeren</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oxelman</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schander</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Phylogenies without roots? A plea for the use of vouchers in molecular phylogenetic studies</article-title>. <source>Mol Phylogenet Evol</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>48</volume>:<fpage>369</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ympev.2008.03.024</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref75"><label>75.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chervy</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Laboratory techniques for the systematic and phylogenetic study of tapeworms (Cestoda) parasitic in bony fishes, amphibians and reptiles</article-title>. <source>Folia Parasitol</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>001</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14411/fp.2024.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>