<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Vet. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Veterinary Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Vet. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2297-1769</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2025.1657098</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Veterinary Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Application of next-generation sequencing for detecting <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> contamination in veterinary vaccines</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Go</surname> <given-names>Su-Min</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3117598/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>Yeon-Kyeong</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nah</surname> <given-names>Jin-Ju</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>Hyun-Ok</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Jang</surname> <given-names>Il</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Seo</surname> <given-names>Min-Goo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2654077/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Veterinary Drugs and Biologics Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency</institution>, <addr-line>Gimcheon-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do</addr-line>, <country>Republic of Korea</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute for Veterinary Biomedical Science, Kyungpook National University</institution>, <addr-line>Daegu</addr-line>, <country>Republic of Korea</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Bacterial Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency</institution>, <addr-line>Gimcheon-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do</addr-line>, <country>Republic of Korea</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1109064/overview">Jerry William Simecka</ext-link>, University of North Texas Health Science Center, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/990456/overview">Hugh Y. Cai</ext-link>, University of Guelph, Canada</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1734300/overview">Huaizu Guo</ext-link>, State Key Laboratory of Antibody Medicine and Targeted Therapy, China</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Il Jang, <email>moa305ho@korea.kr</email>; Min-Goo Seo, <email>koreasmg@knu.ac.kr</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>10</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>1657098</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>30</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>18</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Go, Lee, Nah, Gu, Jang and Seo.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Go, Lee, Nah, Gu, Jang and Seo</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Ensuring the safety and efficacy of veterinary vaccines requires reliable methods for detecting microbial contamination, particularly from <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species, which pose a significant risk in cell-culture-derived vaccines. In the Republic of Korea, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is predominantly used for <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> testing due to its faster turnaround compared to culture-based methods. However, in combination with vaccines containing <italic>Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae</italic> and classical swine fever virus, PCR is rendered ineffective because of cross-reactivity between <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> universal primers and <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic>, resulting in non-specific amplification. This limitation necessitates reliance on the labor-intensive culture method, underscoring the need for more accurate and efficient alternatives. This study aimed to develop and validate next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based methods for detecting <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> contamination in veterinary vaccines and to compare their performance with that of PCR. Five species, including <italic>Acholeplasma laidlawii</italic> (genus <italic>Acholeplasma</italic>) and four <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species&#x2014;<italic>Mycoplasma fermentans</italic>, <italic>Mycoplasma orale</italic>, <italic>Mycoplasma hyorhinis</italic>, and <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic>&#x2013;were spiked into samples containing <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic>, a common vaccine component. Two NGS-based approaches were evaluated: (1) a reference-mapping method incorporating two-step alignment and <italic>de novo</italic> assembly, and (2) a 16S rRNA-based metabarcoding analysis using DADA2 and Qiime2. The reference-mapping method effectively filtered non-specific reads and accurately reconstructed <italic>Mycoplasma</italic>-derived contigs, whereas the metabarcoding approach enabled taxonomic profiling with quantitative resolution. The detection limits of NGS-based methods were substantially lower than those of PCR, demonstrating improvements of up to 100-fold depending on the species. Notably, omission of the initial mapping step resulted in excessive non-specific contig formation, highlighting the importance of the dual-step reference-mapping strategy. Although metabarcoding provided valuable abundance data, it was more prone to non-specific hits due to limited read overlap. In conclusion, the reference-mapping method demonstrated superior sensitivity, specificity, and quantification compared to both conventional PCR and metabarcoding, supporting its use as a robust tool for vaccine quality control. Implementing NGS-based detection methods could significantly enhance the safety and effectiveness of veterinary vaccines, ultimately enhancing vaccine quality control.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd><italic>Mycoplasma</italic> detection</kwd>
<kwd>next-generation sequencing</kwd>
<kwd>reference mapping</kwd>
<kwd>veterinary vaccines</kwd>
<kwd>vaccine quality control</kwd>
<kwd>PCR limitations</kwd>
<kwd>metabarcoding</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="34"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="7042"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Veterinary Infectious Diseases</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Before veterinary vaccines can be marketed, they must undergo testing to ensure compliance with quality standards, safety regulations, and efficacy requirements established by regulatory authorities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>). These tests are conducted both in the countries where the products are approved for sale and internally by manufacturers. Commercial vaccines are vulnerable to contamination by various adventitious agents during the manufacturing process, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species. Among these contaminants, <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> has emerged as a particularly concerning issue due to its potential impact on animal health and vaccine effectiveness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species are a type of bacteria lacking cell walls and are capable of infecting a range of animal hosts, resulting in substantial economic losses in the agricultural sector (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>). Their lack of a cell wall makes them inherently resistant to antibiotics that target cell wall synthesis, complicating treatment efforts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>). <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> can also contaminate cell cultures and biological products without causing visible signs of infection, making detection difficult. Conventional methods for identifying <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> contamination include culture-based techniques and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, both of which are used by the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA) in the Republic of Korea for testing veterinary biologicals. Culture-based methods are widely recognized for their ability to detect viable organisms, but they are time-consuming, often requiring up to 28&#x202F;days for results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>). This delay presents challenges for timely quality control during vaccine production. At APQA, a broad-range PCR assay targeting multiple <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species is employed as the initial screening method. PCR-positive samples are subsequently subjected to culture, and the results of culture are used to make the final determination of <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> contamination.</p>
<p>During routine national lot release testing of combination vaccines containing <italic>Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae</italic> (<italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic>) and classical swine fever virus (CSFV) as antigens, non-specific bands in <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> PCR assays were consistently observed. Analysis of cumulative results from the national lot release tests conducted by APQA in Korea further confirmed that these non-specific findings occurred repeatedly. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) analysis identified these bands as sequences derived from <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic>. Alignment of <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> sequences with <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> universal primers revealed near-complete complementarity, with only a few nucleotide mismatches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). This finding suggests that genetic similarities between <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> and <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species can interfere with PCR specificity, resulting in non-specific amplification and potentially compromising the accuracy of <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> testing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Sequence alignment of the universal Mycoplasma forward (Myco_F) and reverse (Myco_R) primers with the 16S rRNA sequence of <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> (GenBank accession no. NR_040837). For each primer, the upper line represents the primer sequence and the lower line represents the aligned <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> sequence. Identical nucleotides are indicated by dots (&#x201C;.&#x201D;) in the lower sequence, while mismatches are shown as their respective bases and highlighted in pink to indicate regions of divergence that may result in non-specific binding. The forward primer aligns to positions 95&#x2013;115&#x202F;bp, and the reverse primer aligns to positions 534&#x2013;555&#x202F;bp of the <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> 16S rRNA gene. This alignment highlights the potential for cross-reactivity that could generate false positives in PCR assays targeting <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> spp.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-12-1657098-g001.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">DNA sequence alignment showing two sequences labeled Myco_F and Myco_R. The alignment highlights nucleotide variations with red shading. Myco_F displays differences at positions T, C, and T. Myco_R shows differences at positions A, G, and G. Each sequence ends with a number indicating length: Myco_F is twenty-one, Myco_R is twenty-two nucleotides.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have recently proven to be highly effective for detecting and identifying microorganisms. NGS offers high sensitivity and the ability to identify a broad range of microbes without requiring prior assumptions about their presence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>). It provides results within hours to days, addressing the significant delays associated with culture-based methods, which rely on microbial isolation and can take several days or weeks. In addition, culture methods often struggle to accurately identify organisms that are slow-growing or fastidious. NGS overcomes these challenges by enabling direct, unbiased sequencing of microbial DNA, thereby delivering faster and more accurate results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>).</p>
<p>This study aims to address the limitations of PCR by developing a more precise and reliable NGS-based approach for detecting <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> contamination in veterinary vaccines. The goal is to resolve issues of non-specific amplification and enable clear differentiation between <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> and <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> in mixed samples. By achieving accurate detection even in the presence of both pathogens, this method is expected to improve the reliability of vaccine quality control.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Bacterial strains</title>
<p>The test materials were selected in accordance with the International Cooperation on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Veterinary Medicinal Products guideline 34, which serves as a standard for assessing the safety, quality, and efficacy of veterinary drugs, particularly biological products (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). To assess potential contamination, the guideline mandates the use of five specific organisms belonging to the class Mollicutes. Although these organisms belong to different families, they include one species of <italic>Acholeplasma</italic> (<italic>A. laidlawii</italic>) and four species of <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> (<italic>M. fermentans</italic>, <italic>M. orale</italic>, <italic>M. hyorhinis</italic>, and <italic>M. synoviae</italic>). These species were chosen based on several factors, including antibiotic susceptibility, culture requirements, potential for contamination, and pathogenicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>). These organisms originate from a range of hosts, including mammals, birds, and humans. The five species used in this study were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. In addition, <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> was selected as a test material for the development of bioinformatics-based analytical methods due to its genetic similarity to <italic>Mycoplasma</italic>, which makes it difficult to distinguish using PCR. A commercial vaccine approved in the Republic of Korea containing CSFV and <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> antigens was used in the study.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Bacterial and <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species used in this study.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Species</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Strain</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Acholeplasma laidlawii</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">ATCC<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn1"><sup>a</sup></xref> 23206</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Mycoplasma fermentans</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">ATCC 19989</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Mycoplasma orale</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">ATCC 23714</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Mycoplasma hyorhinis</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">ATCC 17981</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">ATCC 25204</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">NL-11<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn1">
<label>a</label>
<p>ATCC, American type culture collection.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="tfn2">
<label>b</label>
<p>NL-11, live vaccine strain.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Sample preparation</title>
<p>Initially, both <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> and <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species were diluted using phosphate-buffered saline. <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> was adjusted to achieve a concentration equivalent to two vaccine doses. Equal volumes (1&#x202F;mL each) of the <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> vaccine and serial dilutions of <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species were then mixed. This ensured that the final concentration of <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> in the mixed sample corresponded to a single vaccine dose, while <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> concentrations varied. The spike assay confirmed that <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> remained at 1.6&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>9</sup>&#x202F;CFU/mL, while the starting concentrations of the five <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species before dilution were as follows: 1.35&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>6</sup>&#x202F;CFU/mL for <italic>A. laidlawii</italic>, 1.05&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>6</sup>&#x202F;CFU/mL for <italic>M. fermentans</italic>, 7.15&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>5</sup>&#x202F;CFU/mL for <italic>M. orale</italic>, 7.95&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>3</sup>&#x202F;CFU/mL for <italic>M. hyorhinis</italic>, and 2.5&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>6</sup>&#x202F;CFU/mL for <italic>M. synoviae</italic>. In addition to the spiked samples, a separate group containing only Mycoplasma, without <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic>, was prepared to assess the detection threshold by PCR. All experiments, including sample preparation and downstream analysis, were performed in triplicate to ensure reliability and reproducibility.</p>
<p>Along with the spiked samples, 31 negative vaccine samples&#x2014;corresponding to half of the 62 vials assigned for quality control at APQA in 2024&#x2014;were also analyzed. These samples consisted of commercial combination vaccines containing only CSFV and <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic>, and were presumed to be free of <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> contamination. The negative field samples were used to verify assay specificity and to serve as negative controls for downstream PCR and NGS-based analyses.</p>
<p>DNA extraction was performed using an automated nucleic acid platform (Maelstrom 4810, TANBead, Taiwan, China) and a magnetic bead-based protocol with the TANBead Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit (TANBead). Following the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions, 300&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of sample and 10&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of Proteinase K were used as input. The DNA was eluted in 80&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of elution buffer.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>PCR and amplicon sequencing</title>
<p>The 16S rRNA molecule, approximately 1,500 base pairs in length, is a widely conserved sequence that contains essential structural regions along with variable regions that enable differentiation between bacterial species. This makes it a commonly used tool in microbiology for bacterial identification and phylogenetic analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>). In this study, primers were designed to amplify the 16S rRNA region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>) with the following sequences (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>): universal forward primer (5&#x2032;-GGC GAA TGG GTG AGT AAC ACG-3&#x2032;) and universal reverse primer (5&#x2032;-CGG ATA ACG CTT GCG ACC TAT C-3&#x2032;). These primers follow the National Regulatory Standards for Veterinary Biologicals established by the Republic of Korea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>). PCR was carried out using the Maxime&#x2122; PCR premix (i-Taq, iNtRON Biotechnology) in a total reaction volume of 20&#x202F;&#x03BC;L comprising 1&#x202F;&#x03BC;L (10&#x202F;pmol) of forward primer, 1&#x202F;&#x03BC;L (10&#x202F;pmol) of reverse primer, 2&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of DNA, and 16&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of distilled water. Thermal cycling conditions included an initial denaturation at 94&#x202F;&#x00B0;C for 5&#x202F;min; 30&#x202F;cycles of denaturation (1&#x202F;min at 94&#x202F;&#x00B0;C), annealing (1&#x202F;min at 60&#x202F;&#x00B0;C), and extension (1&#x202F;min 30&#x202F;s at 72&#x202F;&#x00B0;C); followed by a final extension at 72&#x202F;&#x00B0;C for 7&#x202F;min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel, and the presence of a specific band at 464 base pairs (bp) was confirmed using a UV transilluminator.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Primer details, including nucleotide sequences, locations, amplicon size, and references.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Primers</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Nucleotide sequences (5&#x2032;&#x202F;&#x2192;&#x202F;3&#x2032;)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Location</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Amplicon size (bp)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Reference</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Universal forward</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">GGCGAATGGGTGAGTAACACG</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">90&#x2013;110<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn3"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">464</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Wong-Lee and Lovett (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Universal reverse</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">CGGATAACGCTTGCGACCTATG</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">553&#x2013;532<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn3"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn3">
<label>a</label>
<p>Numbered according to GenBank accession no. M24579.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The PCR products were submitted to a commercial provider (BIONICS, Daejeon, Republic of Korea) for library preparation, quality control, and sequencing using the BITseq next-generation sequencing service. Sequencing was performed with a target output of 30,000 reads, and data were delivered in FASTQ format containing 150&#x202F;bp paired-end reads. These reads were used as raw data for downstream analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Reference-mapping analysis</title>
<p>The raw sequencing data were analyzed using two distinct approaches: a reference-mapping pipeline and a metabarcoding workflow, each employing specialized software tailored to its respective analytical purpose (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The reference-mapping method was developed to isolate specific strains from heterogeneous samples. BBMap (v39.01) was used to align sequencing reads to predefined reference genomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>), while SPAdes (v3.13.1) served as the assembler for genome reconstruction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>). Key features of this pipeline included high-accuracy alignment to reference genomes and targeted extraction of <italic>Mycoplasma</italic>-derived contigs.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Workflow for preprocessing and analyzing next-generation sequencing (NGS) data, comparing two methods: reference mapping and metabarcoding. In the reference-mapping method, the BBMap and SPAdes tools are used. Raw reads undergo vector removal and quality filtering, followed by sequential mapping-first to the <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> reference genome, then to a <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> spp. database-with mapped reads subjected to <italic>de novo</italic> assembly. In the metabarcoding method, Qiime2 and MicrobiomeAnalyst are employed. Denoising is performed to correct sequencing errors and identify unique amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), which are classified taxonomically. Contaminants, low-confidence ASVs, and unclassified sequences are removed. Normalization and rarefaction are applied to control for sequencing depth before relative abundance is analyzed.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-12-1657098-g002.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Flowchart of DNA sequencing processes. Starting with DNA extraction, 16S rRNA targeted PCR, library preparation, and amplicon sequencing, leading to raw data. It splits into two paths: Reference Mapping and Metabarcoding. Reference Mapping includes vector removal, E. rhusiopathiae mapping, Mycoplasma database mapping, and de novo assembly. Metabarcoding involves denoising, feature table construction, taxonomic classification, and data normalization, finishing with data export and visualization.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Prior to analysis, reference sequences for <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> and <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> spp. were compiled. For <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic>, the 16S rRNA partial sequence of strain ATCC 19414 was obtained from the NCBI reference sequence database. Concurrently, 16S rRNA gene reference sequences were obtained from the SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database (released ver. 138.2, SSURef NR99) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>). To construct a targeted database for mapping, sequences were filtered to retain only those assigned to the families <italic>Mycoplasmataceae</italic>, <italic>Acholeplasmataceae</italic>, <italic>Metamycoplasmataceae</italic>, and <italic>Mycoplasmoidaceae</italic> according to SILVA taxonomy (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Data Sheet 1</xref>). In parallel, a UniVec database containing adapter, linker, and primer sequences commonly introduced during cloning workflows was incorporated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>). Although the library preparation process did not explicitly confirm the presence of such sequences, vector screening was included as a precautionary measure to mitigate potential contamination and safeguard data integrity. Vector sequence removal and quality filtering are critical in reference mapping to prevent non-specific alignment of contaminant reads to the reference genome. This pre-processing step is essential for reducing false-positive alignments in downstream mapping.</p>
<p>The reference-mapping protocol consisted of four sequential stages, beginning with vector removal and quality filtering. The bbduk.sh script was used for both tasks. In the first stage, reads were aligned to the UniVec database and separated into vector-contaminated reads (outm1, outm2) and cleaned reads (outu1, outu2). The key parameters included <italic>k</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;31 (<italic>k</italic>-mer length of 31) and hdist&#x202F;=&#x202F;1 (maximum permitted Hamming distance of 1). In the second stage, adapter trimming and quality filtering were performed using the same script with the following parameters: ktrim&#x202F;=&#x202F;r (trimming from the right), <italic>k</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;23 (<italic>k</italic>-mer length of 23), mink&#x202F;=&#x202F;11 (minimum <italic>k</italic>-mer length of 11), hdist&#x202F;=&#x202F;1 (maximum permitted Hamming distance of 1), qtrim&#x202F;=&#x202F;rl (quality trimming from both ends), trimq&#x202F;=&#x202F;20 (quality score threshold of 20), and minlen&#x202F;=&#x202F;50 (minimum read length of 50 bases).</p>
<p>The next two steps involved reference-based alignment using the bbmap.sh script. In step three, reads that did not align with the <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> reference genome were retained using minid&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.95 (minimum identity of 95%) and maxindel&#x202F;=&#x202F;3 (maximum allowable insertion/deletion length of 3 bases). In step four, the remaining reads were aligned to the <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> reference database with stricter parameters: minid&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.99 (minimum identity of 99%) and maxindel&#x202F;=&#x202F;3. Genome assembly was then performed using the SPAdes assembler (spades.py) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>). The detection limit of <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> was established by evaluating colony-forming unit (CFU) counts and identifying contig formation at corresponding dilution levels.</p>
<p>To enable accurate comparisons across samples, sequencing depth was normalized using the Total Count (TC) method. This involved calculating the total coverage for each contig (contig length multiplied by average coverage) and dividing it by the total number of reads in the sample (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>). This normalization approach minimizes technical bias introduced by varying sequencing depths and enables consistent interpretation across datasets. The formula used is as follows:</p>
<disp-formula id="E1">
<mml:math id="M1">
<mml:mtable columnalign="left" displaystyle="true">
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mtext>Normalized Coverage</mml:mtext>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Total Coverage</mml:mtext>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Contig Length</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Average Coverage</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Total Reads in Sample</mml:mtext>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Metabarcoding analysis</title>
<p>The metabarcoding analysis was conducted using Qiime2 (v2024.05) to examine sequencing data from diverse microbial communities present in the samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>). The analysis included quality filtering, sequence clustering, and taxonomic classification at the order level to identify and categorize different species. MicrobiomeAnalyst was also used for downstream data visualization and interpretation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>).</p>
<p>Initial sequencing data were processed in Qiime2 (v2024.05) through a series of bioinformatic procedures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>). Raw sequence reads were imported into the pipeline, and quality control steps were applied. This included preprocessing with DADA2 to remove noise, correct sequencing errors, and identify amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), providing a high-resolution representation of microbial diversity. Following denoising, a feature table was constructed to record the occurrence of each ASV across all samples. Taxonomic classification of ASVs was performed by aligning sequences with the SILVA 16S rRNA reference database (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>), followed by filtering to remove low-confidence assignments and potential contaminants. The data were then normalized to account for variations in sequencing depth, using methods such as rarefaction to allow comparability between samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>). Finally, the processed data were exported for statistical analysis and visualized using various tools within MicrobiomeAnalyst (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>). We assessed the prevalence of <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> in each sample based on visual outputs and evaluated detection limits accordingly.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec8">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Detection limit of conventional PCR: a benchmark for detection</title>
<p>The detection limits for five <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species&#x2014;<italic>A. laidlawii</italic>, <italic>M. fermentans</italic>, <italic>M. orale</italic>, <italic>M. hyorhinis</italic>, and <italic>M. synoviae</italic>&#x2014;were evaluated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>). Amplification for <italic>A. laidlawii</italic> was consistently observed at 3.13. log CFU/mL across all replicates, with no detection at lower concentrations. <italic>M. fermentans</italic> showed a consistent detection threshold of 3.02 log CFU/mL in all three replicates. Similarly, <italic>M. orale</italic> produced amplification at 3.85 log CFU/mL across all replicates. In the case of <italic>M. hyorhinis</italic>, the detection limit varied slightly, with amplification observed at 2.9, 1.9, and 1.9 log CFU/mL, respectively; however, 1.9 log CFU/mL was the most consistent threshold. <italic>M. synoviae</italic> demonstrated reproducible amplification at 3.4 log CFU/mL across all replicates. Collectively, these results indicate variation in PCR detection efficiency among <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species, with amplification generally decreasing as target concentrations decline.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Detection limits of Mycoplasma species using three analytical methods: conventional PCR, reference mapping, and metabarcoding.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Species</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Detection limit (log CFU/mL)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">PCR</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Reference-mapping</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Metabarcoding</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>A. laidlawii</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.1&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn4"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.6&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.6&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>M. fermentans</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.0&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.0&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.7&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>M. orale</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.9 &#x00B1; 0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.5 &#x00B1; 0.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.2 &#x00B1; 0.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>M. hyorhinis</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.2 &#x00B1; 0.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.2 &#x00B1; 0.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.2 &#x00B1; 0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>M. synoviae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.4 &#x00B1; 0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.7 &#x00B1; 0.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.3 &#x00B1; 0.5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn4">
<label>a</label>
<p>Values are presented as mean &#x00B1; standard deviation.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Reference mapping analysis for high-precision detection</title>
<p>The reference-mapping method was applied to assess its performance in detecting multiple <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> spp. in spiked samples. The results present an overview of the read retention at each step of the reference-mapping process and demonstrate how mapped read counts vary according to bacterial concentration.</p>
<p>Sequencing yielded consistently high read counts across all species: 27,633 reads for <italic>A. laidlawii</italic>, 33,496 for <italic>M. fermentans</italic>, 33,210 for <italic>M. orale</italic>, 36,347 for <italic>M. hyorhinis</italic>, and 33,904 for <italic>M. synoviae</italic>, with 100% read retention at the initial stage. After vector sequence removal and quality trimming, nearly all reads were retained, indicating minimal data loss and high initial sequence quality.</p>
<p>Following the first step against <italic>E. rhusiopathiae,</italic> read counts decreased significantly across species: <italic>A. laidlawii</italic> retained 2.6% (726 reads), <italic>M. fermentans</italic> 3.4% (1,129 reads), <italic>M. orale</italic> 4.2% (1,410 reads), <italic>M. hyorhinis</italic> 13.0% (4,729 reads), and <italic>M. synoviae</italic> 7.1% (2,419 reads). A second mapping step against the <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> database further reduced reads, yielding 0.3% (84 reads) for <italic>A. laidlawii</italic>, 1.3% (453) for <italic>M. fermentans</italic>, 1.7% (577) for <italic>M. orale</italic>, 8.3% (3,018) for <italic>M. hyorhinis</italic>, and 2.5% (863) for <italic>M. synoviae</italic> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>). These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the two-step reference-mapping strategy in removing non-specific reads and emphasize the value of sequential mapping for accurate downstream analysis.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Summary of sequencing data for five <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> spp. at <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>1</sup>&#x202F;CFU/mL.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Steps</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Description</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="5">Output reads (percentage to raw reads)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>A. laidlawii</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>M. fermentans</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>M. orale</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>M. hyorhinis</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>M. synoviae</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Raw reads</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">27,633 (100%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33,496 (100%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33,210 (100%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">36,347 (100%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33,904 (100%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Vector removal and Quality trimming</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">27,627 (99.9%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33,459 (99.8%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33,207 (99.9%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">36,340 (99.9%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">32,944 (97.1%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Reference mapping<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn5"><sup>a</sup></xref> (<italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">726 (2.6%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1,129 (3.3%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1,410 (4.2%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4,729 (13.0%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2,419 (7.1%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Reference mapping (<italic>Mycoplasma</italic> DB)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84 (0.3%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">453 (1.3%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">577 (1.7%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3,018 (8.3%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">863 (2.5%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>The table shows read counts after each processing step and the percentage retained relative to raw reads. Specific &#x03B1; values are as follows: <italic>A. laidlawii</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.35, <italic>M. fermentans</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.05, <italic>M. orale</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;7.08, <italic>M. hyorhinis</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;7.94, <italic>M. synoviae</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;2.51.</p>
<fn id="tfn5">
<label>a</label>
<p>Output represents unmapped reads after mapping to the <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> reference genome.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Metabarcoding analysis for comprehensive detection</title>
<p>The metabarcoding method was employed to evaluate the relative abundance of <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> spp. across various dilution levels, offering insights into sample composition and detection limits, For comparison, a table presenting both relative coverage and relative abundance is included (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative coverage and relative abundance of five <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species across dilution levels (CFU/mL).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">CFU/mL</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">
<italic>A. laidlawii</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">
<italic>M. fermentans</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">
<italic>M. orale</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">
<italic>M. hyorhinis</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">
<italic>M. synoviae</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Relative coverage<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn6"><sup>a</sup></xref></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Relative abundance<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn7"><sup>b</sup></xref></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Relative coverage</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Relative abundance</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Relative coverage</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Relative abundance</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Relative coverage</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Relative abundance</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Relative coverage</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Relative abundance</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x03B1;&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>5</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M2">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>123</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>494</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>29</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>978</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>567</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">88.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M3">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>8</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>579</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>022</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>32</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>697</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>698</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M4">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>8</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>356</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>151</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>32</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>718</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>207</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">82.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">NT<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn8"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">NT</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M5">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>9</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>726</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>855</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>34</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>090</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>537</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x03B1;&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>4</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M6">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>017</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>672</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>29</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>268</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>647</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">57.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M7">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>462</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>568</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>30</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>168</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>996</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M8">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>492</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>234</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>34</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>171</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>337</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">78.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">NT</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">NT</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M9">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>784</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>421</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>33</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>059</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>371</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x03B1;&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>3</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M10">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>360</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>182</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>28</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>150</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>950</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M11">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>108</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>699</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>32</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>259</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>792</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M12">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>583</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>522</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>33</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>716</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>252</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">41.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M13">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>8</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>783</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>795</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>31</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>972</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>488</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M14">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>452</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>214</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>35</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>688</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>348</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">42.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x03B1;&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M15">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>450</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>325</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>31</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>034</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>453</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M16">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>831</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>285</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>32</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>118</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>690</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M17">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>317</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>441</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>32</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>182</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>987</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M18">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>8</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>151</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>899</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>34</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>957</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>861</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">74.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M19">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>286</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>276</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>35</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>049</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>014</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x03B1;&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>1</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M20">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>31</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>34</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>27</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>633</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>789</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M21">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>146</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>12</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>33</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>496</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>931</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M22">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>33</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>210</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>107</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M23">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>460</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>277</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>33</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>770</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>699</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">40.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M24">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>262</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>27</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>33</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>904</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>342</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x03B1;&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>0</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M25">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>32</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>006</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>469</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M26">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>32</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>394</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>301</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M27">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>33</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>350</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>658</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M28">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>057</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>498</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>36</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>347</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>85</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M29">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>72</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>110</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>31</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>929</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>917</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x03B1;&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>&#x2212;1</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M30">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>32</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>464</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>755</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M31">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>32</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>062</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>923</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M32">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>32</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>302</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>051</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M33">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>91</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>81</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>34</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>128</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>025</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M34">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>30</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>836</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x00B1;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>950</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Values represent the mean across replicates. Dilution levels (e.g., <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>5</sup>) reflect serial dilutions based on each species&#x2019; initial concentration: <italic>A. laidlawii</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.35, <italic>M. fermentans</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.05, <italic>M. orale</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;7.08, <italic>M. hyorhinis</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;7.94, <italic>M. synoviae</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;2.51 (log CFU/mL).</p>
<fn id="tfn6">
<label>a</label>
<p>Relative coverage calculated as average coverage divided by total reads.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="tfn7">
<label>b</label>
<p>Relative abundance calculated as the proportion of species within the sample.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="tfn8">
<label>c</label>
<p>NT, not tested.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Relative coverage, derived from the reference-mapping method, refers to the proportion of reads mapped to a reference genome out of the total reads in a sample. It is calculated as the sum of the average coverage values across all genome regions divided by the total read count. Relative abundance, in contrast, reflects the proportion of each species within the total microbial population, providing information on species diversity and distribution. Although the relative coverage data are presented for reference, the primary focus is on abundance patterns obtained from the metabarcoding method.</p>
<p>For <italic>A. laidlawii</italic>, the relative abundance at the highest concentration (<italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>5</sup>&#x202F;CFU/mL) was 88.0%. As the dilution increased, abundance dropped sharply, reaching 0% at <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>0</sup> and <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>&#x202F;CFU/mL, where no contigs were detected. <italic>M. fermentans</italic> showed a similar pattern, with 94.4% abundance at &#x03B1;&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>5</sup>&#x202F;CFU/mL, decreasing to 0% at the lowest concentrations. <italic>M. orale</italic> followed this trend, starting at 82.2% and declining to 0% with increasing dilution. <italic>M. synoviae</italic> exhibited the highest starting abundance (92.7%) at &#x03B1;&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>5</sup>&#x202F;CFU/mL, which also dropped to 0% at lower levels. In contrast, <italic>M. hyorhinis</italic>, which began testing at &#x03B1;&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;10<sup>3</sup>&#x202F;CFU/mL due to limited starting material, showed 89.3% abundance at that level. Higher concentration experiments were not conducted for this species, resulting in &#x201C;Not Tested&#x201D; values. Despite this, the metabarcoding successfully detected <italic>M. hyorhinis</italic> at lower concentrations, demonstrating its utility in identifying less abundant species in spiked samples. Non-specific reads from genera such as <italic>Bacillus</italic> and <italic>Staphylococcus</italic> were also detected.</p>
<p>The detection limits of <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> spp. were compared across three methods: conventional PCR, the reference-mapping method, and the metabarcoding method (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>). Across all three methods, standard deviation remained below one log unit across triplicate experiments. PCR exhibited the highest detection thresholds, while both NGS-based methods yielded lower detection limits across all species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Analysis of negative vaccine samples for Mycoplasma contamination</title>
<p>Initial reference-mapping method yielded <italic>mycoplasma</italic>-specific contigs in 5 of the 31 negative vaccine samples. The contigs were 447, 444, 439, 447, and 449&#x202F;bp in length, respectively, and all exhibited sequencing depth below 10. BLAST analysis revealed that four contigs corresponded to <italic>M. synoviae</italic>, whereas the 449&#x202F;bp contig was identified as <italic>M. fermentans</italic>. Concurrently, the sequenced data from these samples were reanalyzed using our metabarcoding method pipeline (Qiime2). This method did not detect any reads classifiable to <italic>Mycoplasma</italic>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec13">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>PCR is generally considered an effective method for pathogen detection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>). In the Republic of Korea, PCR assays using <italic>Mycoplasma</italic>-specific primer sets are employed alongside bacterial culture to detect <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> contamination in veterinary vaccines. If the PCR result is negative, the vaccine is deemed acceptable (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>). If the result is positive, a <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> culture test is conducted. However, PCR has notable limitations, particularly the risk of non-specific amplification under certain conditions. This occurs when primers bind to DNA sequences that are similar&#x2014;but not identical&#x2014;to the intended target (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>). In the case of combination vaccines containing <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> and viral antigens, the 16S rRNA region of <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> shares sequence similarity with <italic>Mycoplasma</italic>-specific primers, leading to non-specific amplification (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). This study addresses these limitations by improving sensitivity and accuracy through NGS and bioinformatics-based methods. NGS has emerged as a transformative solution that overcomes the constraints of conventional methods, thereby improving the safety and quality of biopharmaceuticals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>). Regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in the Republic of Korea, have adopted NGS-based testing to detect both exogenous and endogenous viruses, thereby expanding detection capabilities and significantly reducing analysis time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, we simulated co-infection scenarios by preparing spiked samples containing <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> and various <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> spp. To distinguish between the two, we used two NGS-based analytical approaches: reference mapping and metabarcoding a widely used approach for bacterial taxonomic analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>), typically targeting the V3&#x2013;V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>). Since the PCR method used for <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> detection also amplifies the V3&#x2013;V4 region, we examined whether metabarcoding could be incorporated into the testing process. Empirical results showed that relative abundance values decreased proportionally as <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> concentrations declined in the spiked samples. This pattern illustrates the method&#x2019;s quantitative characteristics and reproducibility. However, its utility in our specific context was limited. The metabarcoding analysis detected low levels of non-specific sequences, such as those from <italic>Bacillus</italic> and <italic>Staphylococcus</italic>, alongside <italic>Mycoplasma</italic>. Standard 16S rRNA-based metabarcoding typically relies on paired-end sequencing of at least 250&#x202F;bp to ensure sufficient read overlap for error correction. In this study, however, the V3&#x2013;V4 region (464&#x202F;bp) was sequenced using 150&#x202F;bp paired-end reads, resulting in insufficient overlap between forward and reverse reads. As a result, denoising algorithms such as DADA2 may not have corrected errors completely, potentially leading to the identification of non-specific sequences due to limitations in chimera removal and ASV detection. Future studies should focus on optimizing overlap length to improve metabarcoding accuracy. This could be achieved by targeting a shorter region, such as the V4 alone (250&#x202F;bp), or by increasing the paired-end read length to 250 or 300&#x202F;bp. However, such improvements may increase sequencing costs.</p>
<p>In contrast, the two-step reference-mapping method proved to be a superior and highly robust solution. The reference-mapping method used in this study employed a two-step alignment procedure. First, sequencing reads were mapped to the 16S rRNA sequence of <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic>, and those mapped reads were removed. In the second step, the remaining reads were aligned to a <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> database, followed by <italic>de novo</italic> assembly using only the reads mapped to <italic>Mycoplasma</italic>. The data demonstrated that both mapping steps were essential for accurate identification. Our data confirmed that both steps are essential for accurate analysis. Omitting the first step makes it difficult to distinguish <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> as the true source of PCR-positive results, whereas omitting the second step results in the generation of an excessive number of contigs and markedly prolonged running times. Therefore, inclusion of both steps is necessary to ensure reliable interpretation (data not shown). Results showed that sequences from <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic>, the vaccine&#x2019;s main component, were successfully removed, enabling more precise downstream analysis. Mapping of samples spiked with <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> revealed that over 90% of total reads corresponding to <italic>A. laidlawii</italic>, <italic>M. fermentans</italic>, <italic>M. orale</italic>, and <italic>M. synoviae</italic> were removed in the first mapping step, while a greater proportion of reads remained for <italic>M. hyorhinis</italic> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>). These results suggest that <italic>Mycoplasma</italic>-positive signals in conventional PCR tests of CSFV-<italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> vaccines may stem from non-specific amplification due to sequence similarities between <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> and <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26 ref27 ref28">26&#x2013;28</xref>).</p>
<p>The results obtained from the negative vaccine samples were inconsistent. While reference-mapping approach produced <italic>mycoplasma</italic>-specific contigs, the metabarcoding method did not detect any reads assignable to <italic>Mycoplasma</italic>. Subsequent culture test yielded no microbial growth, which could support the metabarcoding outcome. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that very small amount of <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> were present at levels insufficient for cultivation, or that laboratory contamination introduced <italic>Mycoplasma</italic>-derived reads. To further investigate this discrepancy, we reanalyzed the sequencing data using shotgun metagenomics tools, Kraken2 and Krona (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29 ref30 ref31">29&#x2013;31</xref>). In this analysis, reads classified as <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> spp. were observed in the same samples where <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> contigs had been generated by reference-mapping (data not shown).</p>
<p>Between the two NGS-based bioinformatics strategies evaluated, the reference-mapping method was selected as the more appropriate approach. This decision was based not only on the occurrence of non-specific signals in metabarcoding but also on the superior detection of genuine <italic>Mycoplasma</italic>-derived reads in negative vaccine samples, indicating greater analytical sensitivity. Because the method is intended as an alternative to conventional PCR, sensitivity is of paramount importance: in current QC practice, PCR-positive results require culture confirmation, and potential false positives can thus be resolved. By contrast, false negatives pose a critical risk by allowing contaminated products to pass undetected.</p>
<p>Despite these advantages, NGS remains limited by higher costs and the need for specialized bioinformatics expertise. Consequently, molecular methods with comparable sensitivity and specificity but lower operational burden&#x2014;such as real-time PCR or RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a&#x2014;may represent more practical long-term solutions for routine testing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>). Nevertheless, in the present context, cross-reactivity was identified as a critical issue specifically in vaccines containing <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> and CSFV. Accordingly, the reference-mapping approach was adopted to address this limitation within an otherwise well-established PCR testing system. Although in this study the NGS-based methods were primarily applied to address the specific issue of cross-reactivity with <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic> in conventional PCR, future study will extend beyond this case.</p>
<p>While NGS is an established method for adventitious agent screening in biologics like cell banks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">34</xref>), its application to mitigate specific PCR cross-reactivity in finished, complex vaccine products represents a significant practical advancement. Unlike raw materials, final vaccine products contain high concentrations of antigens that constitute a challenging analytical matrix. Our two-step mapping strategy is specifically tailored to overcome this matrix effect from <italic>E. rhusiopathiae</italic>, and represents a practical application of NGS to solve a persistent, real-world problem in vaccine lot release testing. This concept may also be extended to national lot release testing of viral vaccines, in which primary removal of major antigens could be followed by adventitious virus detection.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec14">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found here: NCBI BioProject database under accession number PRJNA1335287.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec15">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>S-MG: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Investigation, Visualization, Formal analysis. Y-KL: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Formal analysis, Methodology. J-JN: Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Funding acquisition. H-OG: Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Funding acquisition. IJ: Supervision, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration. M-GS: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Supervision, Methodology.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec16">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by funds from the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Republic of Korea (B-1543073-2024-26-01).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors would like to thank the Veterinary Drugs and Biologics Division and the Bacterial Disease Division at the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency for providing the necessary resources and facilities for this research. We are also grateful to Jessica Hicks at the National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) for her valuable advice.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec17">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec18">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec19">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec20">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1657098/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1657098/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.FASTA" id="SM1" mimetype="chemical/x-fasta" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency</collab></person-group>. Standard manual of diagnostic tests for animals in South Korea. GPRN; (<year>2017</year>)</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fathy</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Safty</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Jakee</surname> <given-names>JK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abd-Alla</surname> <given-names>HI</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahmoud</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Study the effect of Mycoplasma contamination of eggs used in virus titration and efficacy of some live attenuated poultry viral vaccines</article-title>. <source>Asian J Pharm Clin Res</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>216</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i1.14930</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Citti</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blanchard</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Mycoplasmas and their host: emerging and re-emerging minimal pathogens</article-title>. <source>Trends Microbiol</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>196</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>203</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tim.2013.01.003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23419218</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>B&#x00E9;b&#x00E9;ar</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pereyre</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peuchant</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</italic>: susceptibility and resistance to antibiotics</article-title>. <source>Future Microbiol</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>423</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2217/fmb.11.18</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21526943</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll2">European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines &#x0026; HealthCare (EDQM)</collab></person-group>. <article-title>Mycoplasma</article-title> In: <source>European Pharmacopoeia</source>. <edition>11th</edition> ed. <publisher-loc>Strasbourg</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>EDQM</publisher-name> (<year>2023</year>). <fpage>210</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stadhouders</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pas</surname> <given-names>SD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anber</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Voermans</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mes</surname> <given-names>TH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schutten</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The effect of primer-template mismatches on the detection and quantification of nucleic acids using the 5&#x2032; nuclease assay</article-title>. <source>J Mol Diagn</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090035</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19948821</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johansson</surname> <given-names>KE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heldtander</surname> <given-names>MU</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pettersson</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Characterization of mycoplasmas by PCR and sequence analysis with universal 16S rDNA primers</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Miles</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nicholas</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Mycoplasma protocols</source>. <publisher-loc>Totowa, NJ</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Humana Press</publisher-name> (<year>1998</year>). <fpage>145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>65</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quainoo</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coolen</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Hijum</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huynen</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Melchers</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Schaik</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Whole-genome sequencing of bacterial pathogens: the future of nosocomial outbreak analysis</article-title>. <source>Clin Microbiol Rev</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>1015</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/cmr.00016-17</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Didelot</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bowden</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peto</surname> <given-names>TEA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crook</surname> <given-names>DW</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Transforming clinical microbiology with bacterial genome sequencing</article-title>. <source>Nat Rev Genet</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>601</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrg3226</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22868263</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll3">International Cooperation on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Veterinary Medicinal Products (VICH)</collab></person-group>. <source>VICH GL34: Biologicals: Testing for the detection of Mycoplasma contamination</source>. <publisher-name>VICH</publisher-name>; (<year>2014</year>). Available online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://vichsec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/GL34_st7.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://vichsec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/GL34_st7.pdf</ext-link> (Accessed September 25, 2025).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wong-Lee</surname> <given-names>JG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lovett</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Rapid and sensitive PCR method for identification of <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species in tissue culture</article-title>. In <source>Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications</source>. (<year>1993</year>):<fpage>257</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bushnell</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> <source>BBMap: A fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner. SourceForge</source>; (<year>2014</year>). Available online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/" ext-link-type="uri">https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/</ext-link> (Accessed September 26, 2024).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prjibelski</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antipov</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meleshko</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lapidus</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Korobeynikov</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Using SPAdes de novo assembler</article-title>. <source>Curr Protoc Bioinformatics</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>70</volume>:<fpage>e102</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cpbi.102</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32559359</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bankevich</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nurk</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antipov</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gurevich</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dvorkin</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kulikov</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing</article-title>. <source>J Comput Biol</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>455</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/cmb.2012.0021</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22506599</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quast</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pruesse</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yilmaz</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gerken</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schweer</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yarza</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>41</volume>:<fpage>D590</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gks1219</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll4">National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)</collab></person-group>. <source>UniVec database [internet]</source> (<year>2024</year>). Available online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/vecscreen/univec/" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/vecscreen/univec/</ext-link> (Accessed September 26, 2024).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>MB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallroth</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jonsson</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kristiansson</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Comparison of normalization methods for the analysis of metagenomic gene abundance data</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>274</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-018-4637-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29678163</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bolyen</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rideout</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dillon</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bokulich</surname> <given-names>NA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abnet</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Ghalith</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2</article-title>. <source>Nat Biotechnol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>37</volume>:<fpage>852</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-019-0252-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31341288</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beiko</surname> <given-names>RG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>16S rRNA gene analysis with QIIME2</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Beiko</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hsiao</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parkinson</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Microbiome analysis: methods and protocols</source>. <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Humana Press</publisher-name> (<year>2018</year>). <fpage>113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edel</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Polymerase chain reaction in mycology: an overview</article-title>. <source>Appl PCR Mycol</source>. (<year>1998</year>):<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nshimyimana</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Loh</surname> <given-names>LL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gin</surname> <given-names>KYH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Next-generation sequencing (NGS) for assessment of microbial water quality: current progress, challenges, and future opportunities</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>1027</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2015.01027</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26441948</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll5">Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Biologics Research Division</collab></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <source>NGS-based adventitious virus testing manual for vaccine production cell lines</source>. <publisher-loc>Cheongju</publisher-loc>: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety;</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll6">International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH)</collab></person-group> <source>ICH guideline Q5A(R2) on viral safety evaluation of biotechnology products derived from cell lines of human or animal origin</source> (<year>2022</year>)</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tringe</surname> <given-names>SG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hugenholtz</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A renaissance for the pioneering 16S rRNA gene</article-title>. <source>Curr Opin Microbiol</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>442</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.011</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18817891</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Claesson</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>O'Sullivan</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name> <name><surname>Greene-Diniz</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cole</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ross</surname> <given-names>RP</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Comparison of two next-generation sequencing technologies for resolving highly complex microbiota composition using tandem variable 16S rRNA gene regions</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>38</volume>:<fpage>e200</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkq873</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20880993</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Homer</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A survey of sequence alignment algorithms for next-generation sequencing</article-title>. <source>Brief Bioinform</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>473</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bib/bbq015</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20460430</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pop</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salzberg</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Bioinformatics challenges of new sequencing technology</article-title>. <source>Trends Genet</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>142</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tig.2007.12.006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18262676</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><label>28.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aird</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ross</surname> <given-names>MG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>WS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Danielsson</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fennell</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Russ</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Analyzing and minimizing PCR amplification bias in Illumina sequencing libraries</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>R18</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/gb-2011-12-2-r18</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21338519</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><label>29.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>DE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Langmead</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Improved metagenomic analysis with kraken 2</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>257</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31779668</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><label>30.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rincon</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>DE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Breitwieser</surname> <given-names>FP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pockrandt</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Langmead</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Metagenome analysis using the kraken software suite</article-title>. <source>Nat Protoc</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>2815</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41596-022-00738-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36171387</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><label>31.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ondov</surname> <given-names>BD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bergman</surname> <given-names>NH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Phillippy</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Interactive metagenomic visualization in a web browser</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinform</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>385</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-12-385</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21961884</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><label>32.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Templeton</surname> <given-names>KE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scheltinga</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Graffelman</surname> <given-names>AW</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Schie</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crielaard</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sillekens</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Comparison and evaluation of real-time PCR, real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification, conventional PCR, and serology for diagnosis of <italic>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</italic></article-title>. <source>J Clin Microbiol</source>. (<year>2003</year>) <volume>41</volume>:<fpage>4366</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JCM.41.9.4366-4371.2003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12958270</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><label>33.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Development of a rapid and efficient RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay for <italic>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</italic> detection</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>858806</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.858806</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35369478</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><label>34.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Young</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sung</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stacey</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Masters</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Detection of mycoplasma in cell cultures</article-title>. <source>Nat Protoc</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>929</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nprot.2010.43</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20431538</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>