Front. Vet. Sci. Frontiers in Veterinary Science Front. Vet. Sci. 2297-1769 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fvets.2025.1615706 Veterinary Science Correction Corrigendum: Comparative analysis of the development of acquired radioresistance in canine and human mammary cancer cell lines Gray Mark 1 * † Turnbull Arran K. 2 3 † Meehan James 2 † Martínez-Pérez Carlos 2 3 Kay Charlene 2 3 Pang Lisa Y. 1 Argyle David J. 1 1The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 2Translational Oncology Research Group, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 3Breast Cancer Now Edinburgh Research Team, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Edited and reviewed by: Francisco Javier Salguero, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), United Kingdom

 *Correspondence: Mark Gray mark.gray@ed.ac.uk

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

 28 05 2025 2025 12 1615706 21 04 2025 06 05 2025 Copyright © 2025 Gray, Turnbull, Meehan, Martínez-Pérez, Kay, Pang and Argyle. 2025 Gray, Turnbull, Meehan, Martínez-Pérez, Kay, Pang and Argyle

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A corrigendum on Comparative analysis of the development of acquired radioresistance in canine and human mammary cancer cell lines by Gray, M., Turnbull, A. K., Meehan, J., Martínez-Pérez, C., Kay, C., Pang, L. Y., and Argyle, D. J. (2020). Front. Vet. Sci. 7:439. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00439 canine breast cancer models human breast cancer radioresistance global gene analysis characterization of radioresistant cell lines comparative oncology section-at-acceptance Veterinary Clinical, Anatomical, and Comparative Pathology

In the original article, images of spheroids and a scratch assay from a previous publication from our group in the journal Radiation Oncology were re-used (publication: https://ro-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13014-019-1268-2). Whilst this related publication was referenced in the manuscript, the re-use of the figures in their legends was mistakenly not acknowledged. The authors have confirmed that they retain the rights for re-publication/re-use of the images included in the Radiation Oncology publication. The figures in question are 4Ci (images of the MCF-7 and ZR-751 radiosensitive and radioresistant spheroids) and 6A (image of the MDA-MB-231 radioresistant scratch assay). The amended legends appear below.

The caption of Figure 4 previously stated:

Figure 4. Radioresistant cell lines have modified basal proliferation rates relative to their parental cells. (A) SRB assays showing differences in proliferation rates between MCF-7, ZR-751, MDA-MB-231, and REM-134 cell lines and their derived RR cell lines grown in 2D cultures (2-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák multiple comparisons test; data expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3, ****p ≤ 0.0001; ***p ≤ 0.001). (B) Heatmap showing log2 mean-centered gene expression profiles of proliferation genes in parental and RR cell lines showing key G1/S phase regulators taken from the KEGG database cell cycle pathway (55); red = higher expression, black = no change, green = lower expression. Heatmap clustering was carried out using Pearson correlation with average linkage. The gene list is shown in Supplementary Table 3. (Ci) IHC of MTS stained for Ki67 using MCF-7, ZR-751, and REM-134 parental and RR cell lines. (Cii) Quantitative analysis of the % of cells with Ki67 staining (unpaired, two tailed t-test; data expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3, ****p ≤ 0.0001).

The caption has been corrected to:

Figure 4. Radioresistant cell lines have modified basal proliferation rates relative to their parental cells. (A) SRB assays showing differences in proliferation rates between MCF-7, ZR-751, MDA-MB-231, and REM-134 cell lines and their derived RR cell lines grown in 2D cultures (2-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák multiple comparisons test; data expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3, ****p ≤ 0.0001; ***p ≤ 0.001). (B) Heatmap showing log2 mean-centered gene expression profiles of proliferation genes in parental and RR cell lines showing key G1/S phase regulators taken from the KEGG database cell cycle pathway (55); red = higher expression, black = no change, green = lower expression. Heatmap clustering was carried out using Pearson correlation with average linkage. The gene list is shown in Supplementary Table 3. (Ci) IHC of MTS stained for Ki67 using MCF-7, ZR-751 [images reproduced from (34)], and REM-134 parental and RR cell lines. (Cii) Quantitative analysis of the % of cells with Ki67 staining (unpaired, two tailed t-test; data expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3, ****p ≤ 0.0001).

The caption of Figure 6 previously stated:

Figure 6. Radioresistant cell lines have increased migration and invasion potential. (A) Images of 2D migration and 3D MTS invasion assays comparing the parental and the derived RR cell lines. (B) Graphs exhibiting the migration (Bi) and invasion assay (Bii) results. For the migration assays the relative migratory distance was calculated at each time point up to 48 h and expressed as a % area devoid of cells based on the initial scratched area at day 0. Invasion was assessed up to 96 h post-seeding. Area of MTS at each time point was calculated and expressed as a % of initial MTS area at day 0 (2-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák multiple comparisons test; data expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3, ****p ≤ 0.0001; ***p ≤ 0.001; *p ≤ 0.05.

The caption has been corrected to:

Figure 6. Radioresistant cell lines have increased migration and invasion potential. (A) Images of 2D migration and 3D MTS invasion assays comparing the parental and the derived RR cell lines [MDA-MB-231 image reproduced from (34)]. (B) Graphs exhibiting the migration (Bi) and invasion assay (Bii) results. For the migration assays the relative migratory distance was calculated at each time point up to 48 h and expressed as a % area devoid of cells based on the initial scratched area at day 0. Invasion was assessed up to 96 h post-seeding. Area of MTS at each time point was calculated and expressed as a % of initial MTS area at day 0 (2-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák multiple comparisons test; data expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3, ****p ≤ 0.0001; ***p ≤ 0.001; *p ≤ 0.05).

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.