<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Vet. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Veterinary Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Vet. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2297-1769</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2025.1610997</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Veterinary Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Mapping the spread of fluoroquinolone resistance: continued presence of non-susceptible <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in broilers</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Ringenier</surname> <given-names>Moniek</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1056091/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Boyen</surname> <given-names>Filip</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/84651/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bogaerts</surname> <given-names>Bert</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/646806/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Gand</surname> <given-names>Mathieu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2626859/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Vanneste</surname> <given-names>Kevin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/625708/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>De Keersmaecker</surname> <given-names>Sigrid C. J.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/690164/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chantziaras</surname> <given-names>Ilias</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/499779/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ibrahim</surname> <given-names>Nelima</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3130824/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Devreese</surname> <given-names>Mathias</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/77697/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dewulf</surname> <given-names>Jeroen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/749884/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University</institution>, <addr-line>Merelbeke</addr-line>, <country>Belgium</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Pathobiology, Pharmacology and Zoological Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University</institution>, <addr-line>Merelbeke</addr-line>, <country>Belgium</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Transversal Activities in Applied Genomics, Sciensano</institution>, <addr-line>Brussels</addr-line>, <country>Belgium</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/507317/overview">Frederique Pasquali</ext-link>, University of Bologna, Italy</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/796287/overview">Rogers Ruyu Azabo</ext-link>, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1252608/overview">Alois Cizek</ext-link>, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Czechia</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Moniek Ringenier, <email>Moniek.ringenier@ugent.be</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>19</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>1610997</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>13</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>25</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Ringenier, Boyen, Bogaerts, Gand, Vanneste, De Keersmaecker, Chantziaras, Ibrahim, Devreese and Dewulf.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Ringenier, Boyen, Bogaerts, Gand, Vanneste, De Keersmaecker, Chantziaras, Ibrahim, Devreese and Dewulf</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Sustained resistance against fluoroquinolones (FQ), without the use of FQ in broilers, raises important questions about other possible factors contributing to the persistence in farms. Therefore, the current study investigates the prevalence of FQ non-susceptibility in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> on broiler farms and examines the roles of day-old chicks, the farm environment, and the antimicrobial use (AMU) in the dynamics of the within-flock spread.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>On 29 Belgian broiler farms, AMU was monitored, while environmental and day-old chick intestinal samples (day 0) were collected before their arrival. On days 3 and 36 of the production round, 30 cloacal swabs were taken per farm. In all samples, total <italic>E. coli</italic> and FQ non susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates were quantified by non-selective and FQ selective isolation. A selection of the isolates was analyzed using whole-genome sequencing to characterize their resistance and virulence-associated determinants and to investigate their phylogenetic relatedness using core-genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST) and whole-genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Before entering the stable, day-old chicks carried FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> on 79.3% of the farms, while FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> were found in 48.3% of the sampled environments. According to cgMLST, identical FQ non-susceptible isolates were found on day 0 and 36, suggesting that FQ non-susceptible isolates present in the environment at the start of a production round or in day-old chicks, can remain present until slaughter, even when no FQs were used. Total AMU was positively correlated with the proportion of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> [<italic>r</italic> = 0.42, 95% CI (0.06, 0.68), <italic>p</italic> = 0.03], often also multidrug-resistant, at the end of the production cycle.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The continued presence of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> in broiler farms is likely the result of both a historical contamination at the farm level and a continuous influx along the production chain. AMU contributes to the continued presence of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> in broiler farms, but accounted for only a small proportion of the variability in FQ non-susceptibility in currently investigated farms. The role of certain virulence-associated genes in the persistence of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> in broiler farms deserves more in-depth research.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>fluoroquinolone</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>poultry</kwd>
<kwd>antimicrobial resistance</kwd>
<kwd>whole genome sequencing</kwd>
<kwd>antimicrobial usage</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="66"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="10297"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is of critical concern for both human and animal health. The emergence of AMR is a complex issue with antimicrobial usage (AMU) often being the main driver (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>). Several studies have demonstrated a link between lowering AMU and a reduction in AMR in food producing animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3 ref4">2&#x2013;4</xref>). However, in countries or farms not using any (fluoro)quinolones anymore, quinolone resistance in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> has been shown to persist (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5 ref6 ref7 ref8">5&#x2013;8</xref>).</p>
<p>The sustained resistance against fluoroquinolones (FQ), without the use of FQ in broilers, raises important questions about possible other factors contributing to the persistence in these farms. Several studies showed that day-old chicks and the broiler house environment are involved in the introduction and transmission of extended-spectrum <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-lactamase (ESBL) producing <italic>E. coli</italic> in broiler flocks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9 ref10 ref11 ref12 ref13">9&#x2013;13</xref>). For instance, Huijbers et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>) demonstrated that both introduction routes contributed to flock colonization, where nearly all broilers tested positive for ESBL-producing <italic>E. coli</italic> 3 days after the start of the production cycle. Also Dierickx et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>) confirmed this rapid spread within a broiler flock, and was able to link isolates from day-old chicks to isolates in parent stock, suggesting a transmission route from breeding flocks to hatcheries and subsequent uptake by chicks from the hatchery environment. This form of pseudo-vertical transmission in the hatchery was also described by Projahn et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>). On top of that, environmental recirculation of resistant strains from previous production cycles was suggested, as resistant strains were detected even after cleaning and disinfection, a finding also supported by Daehre et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>). Furthermore, insects have been identified as potential vectors contributing to the introduction and dissemination of ESBL-producing <italic>E. coli</italic> within broiler houses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>).</p>
<p>As far as FQ resistance is concerned, several studies suggest vertical transmission of FQ resistant <italic>E. coli</italic> within the broiler production pyramid, highlighting the potential role of breeding animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref15 ref16 ref17">14&#x2013;17</xref>). This has been demonstrated by linking isolates from (grand)parent stock to broilers samples retrieved at the end of the production cycle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref15 ref16 ref17">14&#x2013;17</xref>). Notably, these studies often focussed on sampling at the end of the broiler production cycle and often did not investigate transmission within a flock during the production cycle and the contribution of other potential risk factors such as AMU at the farm level. Petersen et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>) was able to link FQ resistant <italic>E. coli</italic> in parent stock to hatchery fluff and hatching eggs causing an outbreak of colibacillosis in broiler flocks, indicating vertical transmission. Also, several studies highlighted the role of the environment in the circulation of FQ resistant <italic>E. coli</italic> among broilers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>). B&#x00F6;rjesson et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>) could trace strains from grandparent bird to broilers and found resistant <italic>E. coli</italic> with identical patterns in hatcheries and poultry houses, suggesting environmental involvement. However, no direct link was visible between broiler environment and the housed broiler batch. This persistence in the broiler house environment was also suggested by Kaspersen et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>). In an experimental setting, Leclerq et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>) observed that multi-drug-resistant <italic>E. coli</italic> could survive in the environment and potentially recirculate. However, they found no evidence of introduction of resistant strains through day-old chicks. The study did emphasize the need for research under commercial farm conditions, where biosecurity measures would presumably be less controlled than in experimental environments. While several introduction and persistence routes for FQ-resistant <italic>E. coli</italic> in broiler production have been proposed, including vertical transmission and environmental contamination, most existing studies have examined these factors in isolation. Large, comprehensive studies that simultaneously take into account the role of the environment, day-old chicks and AMU, are lacking. To effectively combat FQ resistance in the broiler industry, a more holistic understanding of its presence and dissemination within broiler flocks is essential, allowing for targeted interventions to reduce its prevalence.</p>
<p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of AMU, day-old chicks and the environment in the spread of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> within broiler flocks. Furthermore, the goal was to see how this FQ resistance persists throughout the production cycle and what the (genetic) AMR traits are of the persisting non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> strains.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<p>Approval for this study was granted by the ethical committee of the Faculties of Veterinary Medicine and Bioscience engineering of Ghent University (EC2020/040).</p>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Farm characteristics</title>
<p>This study included 29 commercial broiler farms from the Flanders region of Belgium. Farms were included based on convenience sampling, as they were recruited through outreach efforts facilitated by local veterinary poultry practices. Participation was on a voluntary basis and only conventional broiler (Ross 308) farms in Belgium were included. Per farm, one house was randomly selected for follow-up during one production cycle and samples were collected to determine prevalence of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> on day 0, 3&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2&#x202F;days, and 36&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3&#x202F;days of that production round. Also, information was collected on farm size, hatchery, age of the parent stock, and AMU during that specific production round. AMU of the specific production cycle was collected by a form which was filled in by the farmer during the sampling period. Quantification of AMU was done through the calculation of the Treatment Incidence (TI) per 100&#x202F;days, as described by Persoons et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>). The TI is equal to the number of days animals are treated with antimicrobials in a theoretical period of 100&#x202F;days. Sampling was conducted between October 2020 and December 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Sample collection environment</title>
<p>Environmental swabs from the stable were collected on day 0 before the day-old chicks arrived, when bedding material was already placed and the feeding pans were filled. For the environmental swabs premoistened sponge swabs with 10&#x202F;mL Buffered Pepton Water (BPW) were used (3&#x202F;M, SLL10BPW, St-Paul, United States). Five locations were sampled in duplicate: the floor and boots in the anteroom, and the floor, drinking cups, and feeding pans in the house. An A4-sized floor area was sampled per swab, while three drinking cups, one feeding pan per swab, or both soles of a pair of boots were sampled per swab. These locations were chosen based on previous research, which identified these locations as high risk areas for contamination with bacteria, even after cleaning and disinfection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>). Also, drinking water samples were collected at the end of the drinking line in each house after cleaning the line with a disinfectant and running the water for around 3 min. The sample was sent to an external laboratory for bacteriological analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Sample collection broilers</title>
<p>On day 0, 3, and 36, chicks were sampled to screen for gastrointestinal carriage of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic>. On day 0, 30 day-old chicks were randomly collected before they were unloaded in the house. The chicks were transported to the laboratory in a cardboard transport box, followed by euthanasia through cervical dislocation and collection of the entire gastrointestinal tract and contents. On day 3 and 36, cloacal samples were collected from 30 randomly selected chicks using sterile rayon-tipped swabs (Vacutest Kima, Italy). Also, on day 36, three broilers were euthanized and feather samples were collected to screen for FQ residues. All collected samples were cooled directly, transported at a temperature of 2&#x2013;7&#x00B0;C and processed within 4&#x202F;h after collection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>FQ residues in feathers</title>
<p>To detect residues of FQ in the feathers of broilers, a validated UPHLC-MS/MS method was used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>). The feathers were screened for the presence of ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin and flumequine residues. The residue concentration of the complete feather sample was determined by weighing around 500&#x202F;mg of feathers, followed by cutting the feathers into smaller pieces and grinding. From every grinded feather sample, around 100&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1&#x202F;mg was weighed and further processing took place as described in Ringenier et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>). The limit of quantification (LOQ) of the used method was 5&#x202F;ng/g feather for enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, and 1&#x202F;ng/g feather for flumequine.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Bacteriological analysis</title>
<p>In the day-old chicks, the entire gastrointestinal tracts were removed with sterile material, cut into smaller pieces, weighed and transferred into a stomacher bag. Subsequently, sterile BPW (Oxoid, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Merelbeke, Belgium) was added (in ratio of 9&#x202F;mL of BPW per gram of intestines) and thoroughly mixed using a stomacher. Next, 100&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of the mixture was inoculated on FQ selective (MacConkey agar Nr 3 (Oxoid, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Merelbeke, Belgium) supplemented with 0.25&#x202F;mg/L enrofloxacin) and FQ non-selective (MacConkey agar Nr 3) media. These plates were aerobically incubated overnight at 37&#x00B0;C, as well as the intestine suspensions in BPW. If no growth was visible on the (supplemented) MacConkey agar plates, 100&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of the enriched broth was inoculated on a MacConkey plate and/or a MacConkey plate supplemented with 0.25&#x202F;mg/L enrofloxacin. The concentration of enrofloxacin in the supplemented plates was used to select for non-wild type isolates (0.25&#x202F;mg/L is the epidemiological cut-off value (ECOFF) for enrofloxacin in <italic>E. coli</italic>). &#x201C;FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates&#x201D; will be used in this article for FQ non-wild type isolates.</p>
<p>To the environmental swabs, 10&#x202F;mL of sterile BPW was added immediately after transportation to the laboratory. After homogenization, using a stomacher, the swab suspensions were aerobically incubated for 24&#x202F;h at 37&#x00B0;C. After incubation, 10&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of this suspension was plated on FQ selective and FQ-non-selective media as described above and aerobically incubated overnight at 37&#x00B0;C.</p>
<p>One hundred milliliter of the collected water samples was filtered through a 0.45&#x202F;&#x03BC;m filter. The filter was placed on non-supplemented Rapid <italic>E. coli</italic> (Bio-Rad) agar plates and Rapid <italic>E. coli</italic> agar plates supplemented with 0.25&#x202F;mg/L enrofloxacin to screen for FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic>. Plates were aerobically incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 24&#x202F;h. The colonies were counted and the number of <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates was determined per 100&#x202F;mL.</p>
<p>Cloacal swabs were weighed before and after collecting feces to determine the amount of feces collected. Three milliliter of BPW was added and the swab was thoroughly vortexed. Next, 100&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of the feces suspension was used to make 10 fold serial dilutions (from 10<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> to 10<sup>&#x2212;4</sup>) in Phosphate Buffered Salt solution (PBS). Of every dilution, 100&#x202F;&#x03BC;L was inoculated on FQ selective and FQ non-selective media. These plates were aerobically incubated overnight at 37&#x00B0;C, as were the swabs containing BPW broth for microbial enrichment. The concentration of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> and total <italic>E. coli</italic> in the cloacal samples were determined (CFU/gram feces) based on the counts on plates with 20&#x2013;200&#x202F;CFU and taking into account the weight of the feces on the swab (ranging between 0.01 and 0.34 gram). The proportion of CFU grown on FQ selective over FQ non-selective MacConkey plates allowed to determine the prevalence of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> strains in a specific cloacal sample. Identification of the isolates at the species level were done by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, as previously described in Vereecke et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>). When no growth was visible on the FQ selective or the non-selective MacConkey plates, 100&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of the overnight enriched broth was inoculated on a second MacConkey plate (supplemented with enrofloxacin) and aerobically incubated overnight at 37&#x00B0;C. When colonies were detected after enrichment only, it was assumed that the concentration was below the detection limit of direct plating. For analysis, the value of such samples was set at the detection limit (for day-old chicks this was 10&#x202F;CFU/mL BPW and for cloacal swabs 100&#x202F;CFU/mL BPW) and corrected for the amount of feces on the swabs, as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>).</p>
<p>Of every farm from each sampling point, around 10 randomly selected FQ non-susceptible isolates originating from 10 different animal samples were stored at &#x2212;20&#x00B0;C. From each positive environmental sample, one FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> isolate was stored. Due to practical and financial constraints, only a selection of isolates was further analyzed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>MIC</title>
<p>For the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), five farms were included based on the results of the prevalence of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> in the environment and in day-old chicks. Only isolates of day 0 and 36 were included for MIC determination, which resulted in a selection of 92 <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates obtained from FQ supplemented plates. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using a Sensititre EU Surveillance <italic>E. coli</italic> EUVSEC Plate (Trek Diagnostic Systems, Thermofisher Scientific, Merelbeke, Belgium) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s guidelines. The protocol was followed as described in Ibrahim et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>). In brief, the Sensititre plate was aerobically incubated at 35&#x00B0;C for 18&#x2013;24&#x202F;h. The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration at which no visible growth was observed. The quality control strain used was <italic>E. coli</italic> ATCC 25922. The ECOFFs from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing were used for interpretation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>WGS</title>
<p>Based on MIC results, a further selection of <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates was made for whole genome sequencing (WGS). Isolates with different resistance profiles from the same sample time point within a farm were included to undergo WGS, resulting in a selection of 66 FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates, originating from four farms. DNA extraction was done using the GenElute&#x2122; Bacterial Genomic DNA Kit from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck, Overijse, Belgium) following the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol. The quantity and purity of the DNA was determined spectrophotometrically using a NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) and the quantity using fluorometry (Qubit 4, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). A DNA-library was made using the Nextera XT library kit (Illumina). Library fragmentation length and library DNA concentration were evaluated using the TapeStation 4,200 with the HS D5000 ScreenTape and Reagent kits (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and a dsDNA HS assay kit for the Qubit 4 fluorometer, respectively. All libraries were sequenced on a MiSeq instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA) using the MiSeq V3 chemistry, as described by the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol, for the production of 2 &#x00D7; 250&#x202F;bp paired-end reads. Pre-processing and quality control of the sequenced data were performed using the Shiga-toxin producing <italic>E. coli</italic> pipeline described by Bogaerts et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>). NCBI AMRFinder+ (v3.10.18) was used to screen the assembled contigs for genes and mutations associated with AMR using the 2021-12-21.1 database. This database includes genomic markers commonly associated with FQ resistance, such as the often plasmid-encoded <italic>qnr</italic> and <italic>qepA</italic> genes, as well as chromosomal mutations in for example <italic>gyrA</italic> and <italic>parC</italic>. Additionally, the assemblies were screened for the presence of virulence-associated genes using blastn v2.6.0 and the VirulenceFinder <italic>E. coli</italic> database (accessed on July 23, 2023). Sequence typing was performed using the MLST and cgMLST schemes obtained from EnteroBase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">29</xref>) (accessed on July 7th 2024) as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>). Additional SNP-based clustering was performed for sequence types (STs) with multiple isolates using SnapperDB v1.0.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">30</xref>), of which the selected reference genomes are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>. Isolates were considered to be clusters if their pairwise SNP distances were 5 or less (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Validation of WGS-based taxonomic identification for <italic>Escherichia fergusonii</italic> strains</title>
<p>The WGS data analysis workflow includes taxonomic classification of the trimmed reads using Kraken 2 v2.0.7 and a custom database containing all NCBI RefSeq genome entries (database accessed 2nd November 2021) annotated as &#x201C;complete genome&#x201D; with accession prefixes NC, NW, AC, NG, NT, NS, and NZ of the following taxonomic groups: archaea, bacteria, fungi, human, protozoa, and viruses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>). For nine strains, the proportion of reads classified to an unexpected species (i.e., not <italic>E. coli</italic>) was greater than 5%, which is the failure threshold enforced in the workflow (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>). For these datasets, the majority of reads were classified as <italic>E. fergusonii</italic>. Additional verification was performed by constructing a core genome MLST phylogeny containing all in-house strains, complemented with 50 randomly selected complete <italic>E. coli</italic> and randomly selected complete <italic>E. fergusonii</italic> genomes from NCBI. In the resulting topology, the nine strains classified as <italic>E. fergusonii</italic> by Kraken 2 clustered with the <italic>E. fergusonii</italic> genomes obtained from NCBI, indicating that this taxonomic identification is likely to be correct.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>2.9</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>For descriptive statistics, IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0 (IBM, New York, United States) was used. To investigate the relationship between the proportion of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> at the end of the production cycle and total TI of the production cycle, age of the parent stock, capacity of the stable, proportion of positive day-old chicks, and sum of FQ positive environmental locations; a backwards stepwise regression model was conducted, using <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.1 for inclusion in the model, resulting in a univariable linear regression model. An independent <italic>t</italic>-test was conducted to determine if there was a significant difference in proportion of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> on day 3 between the flocks that were treated with lincomycin and spectinomycin and the flocks that did not receive such treatment. An independent samples Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to compare the average number of day-old chicks carrying FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> per farm across different hatcheries.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec12">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<p>This study included 29 commercial broiler farms with an average house capacity of 35,453 birds [min 14,400 - max 80,000]. The batches of day-old chicks from all farms originated from a total of seven different hatcheries. The average age of the parent stock was 48.82&#x202F;weeks (SD&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;12.80). Farm characteristics are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S2</xref>.</p>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>AMU</title>
<p>On 72.4% (21/29) of the farms, the production cycle started with a course of antimicrobials (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), of which 95.5% used lincomycin in combination with spectinomycin. Five farms started using antibiotics some days after the start of the production cycle. Only three farms did not administer antimicrobials during the entire production period (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S3</xref>). The average TI<sub>DDDvet</sub> was 4.18 [min 0 - max 33.72], meaning that broilers in this study received antimicrobials during on average 4.18% of their lifespan, which equals to 1.8 treatment days within a production cycle of 42&#x202F;days. Only one farm reported using a FQ (flumequine) during the observed production cycle. The concentration of flumequine in the feathers from this farm ranged from 50 to 600&#x202F;ng/g feather (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Table S4</xref>). In the feather samples of the other farms, no FQ concentrations above LOQ could be detected, except for one farm where very low levels of flumequine above LOQ were found, ranging from 1.2 to 3.7&#x202F;ng/g feather. According to the AMU records, only lincomycin in combination with spectinomycin was administered on this farm in the first 3&#x202F;days of the production cycle.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Antimicrobial treatments in the broiler flocks during the observed production cycle (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;29). The results show the percentage of flocks starting treatment per antimicrobial group, together with percentage of flocks under treatment during each day of the production cycle (continuous black line).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-12-1610997-g001.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Line chart displaying the percentage of broiler flocks under treatment over a 38-day production cycle. Various colored bars represent different medications, with Lincomycin spectinomycin used heavily initially, followed by other antibiotics like Trimethoprim sulfadiazinum and Flumequine in smaller proportions throughout the cycle.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>FQ non-susceptibility day 0</title>
<p>On 14 farms, at least one FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> isolate could be obtained from the environment before the day-old chicks entered the stable (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S5</xref>). On 79.3% (23/29) of the farms, FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> were detected in the gastro-intestinal tracts from day-old chicks before entering the stable (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). Of these positive flocks, the percentage of day-old chicks carrying FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> was on average 55.3% [min 6.7 - max 100] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of positive day-old chicks between the different hatcheries (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.38), indicating that there was no specific hatchery providing a significant higher or lower number of day-old chicks carrying FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Number of farms with <italic>E. coli</italic> and FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> in the environment (broiler house) before arrival of day-old chicks, specified for the different sampled locations within the house.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Sampled location</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>E. coli</italic> (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;29)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;29)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Floor anteroom</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11 (38%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7 (24%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Boots</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10 (34%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3 (10%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Drinking cups</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7 (24%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3 (10%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Feeding pans</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15 (52%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6 (21%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Floor house</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13 (45%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7 (24%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Drinking water</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6 (21%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1 (3%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Nr of farms with at least one positive sample</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26 (90%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14 (48%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>The number of farms that received day-old chicks with FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> in the gastrointestinal tract, the average percentage of chicks carrying FQ non-susceptibility, and the proportion of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> (of total <italic>E. coli</italic>) at farm level, for each hatchery from which the flocks originated. The flocks of the 29 participating farms originated from 7 different hatcheries (A to G).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Hatchery</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number of flocks with FQ non-susceptible positive chicks (of total farms originating from same hatchery)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Percentage of chicks carrying FQ non-susceptibility (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Proportion FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> in FQ positive samples (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">A</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6/7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">40.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">B</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3/6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">C</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8/9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">32.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">D</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3/3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">65.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">48.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">E</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">72.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">53.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">F</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">G</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1/1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">96.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">56.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Total</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23/29</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">43.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28.3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Farm level percentage of samples harboring fluoroquinolone (FQ) non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> per sampling point during one production cycle. On day 0, gastrointestinal contents were sampled and on day 3 (&#x00B1;2) and 36 (&#x00B1;3), cloacal swabs were taken. In six batches of day-old chicks no FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> could be detected. The mean percentage for each time point is depicted as a red triangle.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-12-1610997-g002.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Line graph showing the percentage of positive samples over a 36-day production cycle. Multiple colored lines represent different sample groups. All lines start low at day 0, peak near 100% by day 3, and remain high at day 36. A red triangle highlights significant data points.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>FQ non-susceptibility during production cycle</title>
<p>On days 3 and 36, FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> were present at 100% of the farms (and in 94.0 and 99.4% of the broiler samples, respectively) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). On days 0, 3 and 36, the proportion of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> in the total <italic>E. coli</italic> population (only taking into account samples that contained <italic>E. coli</italic>) was 28.3%, 26.7, and 30.6%, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Table S6</xref>). The total TI of the production cycle was significantly associated with the proportion of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> at the end of the production cycle (<italic>r</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.42, 95% CI [0.06, 0.68], <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.03) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). There was no significant difference in mean proportion of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> at day 3 between the flocks treated with lincomycin and spectinomycin and the flocks that did not receive such treatment, with a mean difference of 4.87% (95% CI [&#x2212;10.38, 20.10%], <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.52).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Proportion of fluoroquinolone (FQ) non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> in the total <italic>E. coli</italic> population in fecal samples of broilers containing FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> (only taking into account samples that contained <italic>E. coli</italic>). On day 0, intestines and contents were sampled and on day 3 (&#x00B1;2) and 36 (&#x00B1; 3), cloacal swabs were investigated.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-12-1610997-g003.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Box plot showing the proportion of fluoroquinolone non-susceptible &#x002A;E. coli&#x002A; (%) on days 0, 3, and 36 of a production cycle. Median values decrease from day 0 to day 36.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Scatter plot and corresponding regression line for the relationship between the dependant variable proportion of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> at the end of the production cycle (day 36) and the independent variable total antimicrobial usage expressed in treatment incidence (TI) at the farm level.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-12-1610997-g004.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Scatter plot showing the relationship between treatment incidence and the proportion of fluoroquinolone-non-susceptible E. coli. Treatment incidence ranges from 0 to 40 and the proportion ranges from 0 to 60 percent. A trend line indicates a positive correlation with an R-squared value of 0.17.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Multidrug-resistance</title>
<p>Of the 92 selected isolates (obtained from FQ supplemented plates) which underwent MIC determination, 63.6% was multidrug-resistant when applying ECOFF values (resistant against 3 or more antimicrobial classes) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S7</xref>). Of the 66 isolates selected for WGS, nine isolates which were previously identified as <italic>E. coli</italic> by MALDI-TOF MS, were identified as <italic>Escherichia fergusonii</italic> based on WGS data (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Table S8</xref>). Of the remaining 57 <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates, 14 isolates originated from environmental samples, 22 isolates from day-old chicks and 21 isolates from broilers at day 36. The concordance between the detected genetic traits and the observed phenotypic resistance, known as the phenotypic-genotypic relationship, ranged from 93.0% for beta-lactam antibiotics to 100% for sulfonamides, trimethoprim and quinolones. About 80.7% of the isolates carried resistance genes against beta-lactam antimicrobials and 71.9% against aminoglycosides. Only one isolate, from a broiler at day 36, carried an ESBL gene (<italic>bla</italic><sub>CTX-M-55</sub>). WGS detected genes and/or mutations associated with three or more classes of antibiotics in over 86% of the isolates (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Table S8</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Genetic traits FQ non-susceptibility</title>
<p>Of the FQ non-susceptible isolates, 61.4% carried point mutations in the Quinolone Resistance-Determining Region (QRDR) and 38.6% carried <italic>qnr</italic> resistance genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). No other FQ resistance traits were detected. The proportions of <italic>qnr</italic> genes and QRDR mutations per sampling time point are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>. All isolates with triple or quadruple QRDR mutations (<italic>n&#x202F;=</italic> 11) had ciprofloxacin MIC values &#x003E; 4&#x202F;mg/L (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Table S8</xref>). Of the 14 strains carrying <italic>qnr</italic> genes, two carried an additional AMR gene on the corresponding contig, being <italic>bla</italic><sub>CTX-M-55</sub> and <italic>tet(A)</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Table S8</xref>). All <italic>E. fergusonii</italic> isolates (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;9), consisting of two clusters of identical isolates carried the <italic>gyrA</italic> S83L mutation. One cluster of <italic>E. fergusonii</italic> isolates (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;7) additionally carried the <italic>parE</italic> I355T mutation.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Phylogenetic tree of fluoroquinolone (FQ) non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> based on core genome MLST. The FQ resistance genes and/or mutations are shown in the outer band: orange is the presence of QRDR mutations, purple is presence of <italic>qnr</italic> genes. Isolates from four farms were included, originating from sampling point day 0 and day 36. For every isolate the sampling name and sequence type are given. The letter A or E indicates whether the sample is taken from an animal (A) or the environment (E). The tree was constructed using the &#x201C;MSTreeV2&#x201D; method of GrapeTree. Branch lengths and the scale bar are expressed as the number of allelic differences.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-12-1610997-g005.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Circular phylogenetic tree diagram showing genetic relationships among samples from various farms. The outer rings indicate farm numbers with different colors (green, orange, pink, and blue), sampling points (Day 0 and Day 36), and origins (animal and environment). Each segment represents different ST types and their genetic distances, as depicted by branch lengths.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Proportion of <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates with QRDR mutations and <italic>qnr</italic> genes on day 0 (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;34) and day 36 (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;23).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Mutation/gene</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Proportion of isolates on day 0 (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Proportion of isolates on day 36 (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>gyrA</italic> D87N</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">17.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>gyrA</italic> D87Y</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">8.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>gyrA</italic> S83L</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">61.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">60.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>parC</italic> A56T</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">2.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>parC</italic> S80I</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">26.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>parC</italic> S80R</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>parE</italic> S458A</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>qnrB19</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>qnrS1</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>qnrS13</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.7</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Virulence-associated genes</title>
<p>The 57 analyzed <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates carried on average 13 virulence-associated genes (VAGs) (SD&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;5.13). Of the 57 <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates, most common VAGs were <italic>terC</italic> (93.0%), <italic>nlpI</italic> (87.7%), <italic>iss</italic> (86.0%), <italic>traT</italic> (77.2%), <italic>sitA</italic> (75.4%), <italic>hlyF</italic> (64.9%), <italic>csgA</italic> (56.1%), <italic>iutA</italic> (56.1%), <italic>iucC</italic> (54.4%), and <italic>lpfA</italic> (52.6%). Other genes were present in less than 50% of the isolates (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Table S8</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>3.7</label>
<title>Clustering</title>
<p>There was a large variation in the STs of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic>, both within and between farms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Three isolates were assigned to different novel STs (i.e., STs not yet introduced in the EnteroBase database). On farm 10 (ST1196) and 25 (ST40), FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates collected on day 0 from the environment, showed identical cgMLST profiles and &#x003C;5 pairwise SNP differences to isolates obtained from cloacal swabs of broilers on the same farm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">Supplementary Table S6</xref>). In addition, on farms 6 (ST1485) and 10 (ST1146), isolates from day-old chicks clustered together with those from the broiler at the end of the production cycle. On farm 6, five ST1485 isolates exhibited &#x2264;3 pairwise SNP differences, while on farm 10, two ST1146 isolates, for which SNP analysis was not possible due to the lack of a suitable reference genome, had identical cgMLST profiles. Moreover, isolates from different day-old chicks within the same farm clustered together, which was the case on farm 25 (three ST1485 isolates with 0 pairwise SNP differences), farm 22 (three ST69 isolates with 0&#x2013;4 pairwise SNP differences), and farm 6 (four ST1485 isolates with 1&#x2013;4 pairwise SNP differences) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S9</xref>). For ST5451, five isolates collected from chicks on day 0 shared identical cgMLST profiles. However, no suitable reference genome was available on EnteroBase, and SNP analysis was not performed.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec20">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>FQ are classified as critically important antimicrobials by both the World Health Organization and the World Organization of Animal Health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">34</xref>). To reduce FQ resistance prevalence through targeted interventions, more insight into the role of the environment, day-old chicks and AMU in the spread of FQ resistance in the broiler industry is required. Our study revealed that <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates with non-wild type FQ phenotype were present on all sampled broiler farms at day 3 until the end of the production cycle. The proportion of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> stayed relatively stable at around 30% from day of hatch till day 36. Notably, these non-susceptible strains persisted even on 29 farms where no FQ were used, suggesting the influence of other contributing factors. Our study showed that FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> are often multidrug-resistant strains, as also previously published (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>). This could explain the persistence of FQ non-susceptibility through co-selection by the use of other antimicrobials (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36 ref37 ref38 ref39">36&#x2013;39</xref>). This hypothesis is supported by our WGS results, showing a high number of isolates carrying resistance genes against aminoglycosides and beta-lactam antibiotics. These antimicrobial classes are frequently used in the broiler industry, including in the farms in our study. In particular, aminoglycoside usage was common, as 20 farms in our study started their production cycle with a treatment of lincomycin combined with spectinomycin. Additionally, one farm showed substantially higher antibiotic usage compared to the others. After careful review, this observation was retained, as there was no indication of an error and it accurately reflected the variability in antibiotic use across farms. All in all, co-selection could account for the significant, though weak, positive correlation we found between the total TI during the production cycle and the proportion of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> at the end of the cycle, indicating that reducing only FQ use is insufficient to limit resistance selection pressure and a broader reduction in total AMU is probably warranted. In addition, two strains harboring a <italic>qnr</italic> gene carried an additional AMR gene on the corresponding contig, being <italic>bla</italic><sub>CTX-M-55</sub> and a <italic>tet(A)</italic> gene. Both genes are commonly plasmid-associated, suggesting possible co-selection of AMR genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">40</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">41</xref>). However, as only short-read sequencing data is available, plasmid sequences are likely fragmented and additional co-localizations of <italic>qnrS</italic> with other AMR genes may have been missed. Further studies are needed to determine the effect of co-selection and antibiotic treatment strategies on the emergence of multidrug resistance in <italic>E. coli</italic>.</p>
<p>However, AMU accounted for only a small portion of the variability in the proportion of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic>, indicating that other factors also have an impact on the occurrence of FQ resistance. On the three farms that did not use any antimicrobials, FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> were found in (almost) all sampled broilers at day 3 and 36. The fact that even without any antimicrobial selection pressure, the FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> strains can persist in the broiler population, suggests that the fitness costs of the present FQ resistance mechanisms are low or even non-existent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">42</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">43</xref>). The study by Marcusson et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">42</xref>) showed that an initial mutation (mostly <italic>gyrA</italic>) had a fitness cost, but later compensatory <italic>parC</italic> mutations could confer an increase in both resistance and fitness. This was later confirmed by the study of Machuca et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">43</xref>), where an enhanced bacterial fitness was observed when there was a combination of mutations in the QRDR region or in the presence of only the <italic>qnrS1</italic> gene. In our study, three of the four clusters of persistent isolates carried only a <italic>qnrS1</italic> gene, and the other cluster carried a combination of QRDR mutations, including mutations in <italic>gyrA</italic> and <italic>parC</italic>. Also, the FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates carried on average 13 virulence-associated genes. VAGs are commonly used to differentiate pathogenic <italic>E. coli</italic> strains from commensal ones. However, making a clear distinction remains challenging due to the extensive genetic diversity within the <italic>E. coli</italic> species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44 ref45 ref46">44&#x2013;46</xref>). Ovi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">46</xref>) identified 10 key VAGs in avian pathogenic <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates compared to non-pathogenic strains, serving three main functional roles, being secretion-related functions (<italic>cvaC, episomal ompT, hlyF</italic>), iron acquisition (<italic>iroN, iutA, iucD</italic>), and host attachment, invasion, and survival (<italic>tsh, papG, hlyF, iss</italic>). However, other studies reported different genes being common in APEC strains, like <italic>traT, sitA, csgA, lpfA, iucC</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">45</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">48</xref>). Notably, many of these possible pathogenic related VAGs were also present in the FQ non-susceptible isolates from our study, being <italic>iss</italic>, <italic>traT, sitA, hlyF, csgA, iutA, iucC, lpfA</italic>, and <italic>cvaC</italic>.</p>
<p>However, commensal <italic>E. coli</italic> strains can also harbor VAGs which can offer a competitive advantage in the gut microbiota (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>). These genes may not necessarily confer pathogenicity but can improve survival and competitiveness in various ecological niches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">49</xref>). Pakbin et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">48</xref>) reported the presence of several VAGs from human enteric <italic>E. coli</italic> pathotypes which play a role in survival influencing colonization (e.g., <italic>csgA</italic>), fitness (e.g., <italic>iutA, kpsMTII, fyuA</italic>), toxin production (e.g., <italic>astA, hlyE</italic>), and effector functions promoting adherence and biofilm formation (e.g., <italic>espB, espA, espF, espJ</italic>). The presence of these VAGs could enhance survival in both gut and environmental settings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">48</xref>). For example, <italic>sitA</italic> is linked to increased resistance to oxidative stress, and iron acquisition systems is considered being beneficial for environmental persistence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>). Moreover, commensal isolates may act as reservoirs for transferable VAGs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">50</xref>), facilitating the spread of virulence traits within microbial communities. The FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates in this study carried on average 13 VAGs, which does not necessarily indicate pathogenic potential. However, the presence of these genes could contribute to enhanced fitness, colonization, and survival in both host-associated and external environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">45</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">48</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>), which could be an explanation for their survival within the broiler population. Further research is needed to investigate the fitness of these FQ non-susceptible strains and to link specific resistance mechanisms and virulence-associated genes to their potential fitness effects.</p>
<p>Furthermore, according to our cgMLST clustering, FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates obtained from both day-old chicks and the environment present at day 0 can persist in chicks throughout the whole production cycle, indicating that these strains play a role in the persistence of FQ resistance in broilers. Regarding environmental dissemination, previous studies have already described the persistence of quinolone resistant <italic>E. coli</italic> in the broiler production environment and hypothesized that the occurrence in broilers may be influenced by on-farm recirculation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">52</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">53</xref>). Our findings support this hypothesis, as in 45% of the farms, FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> were found in the house environment before the animals even entered the stable and were able to persist until the end of the production cycle. In Belgium it is common practice to clean and disinfect the house between production cycles, although the used methods can vary in effectiveness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">54</xref>). The high prevalence of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> in the environment highlights the critical need for performing the cleaning and disinfection more thoroughly to prevent cross-contamination between production rounds. However, contamination could also occur through the introduction of materials into the house after cleaning and disinfection, such as through feed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">55</xref>), or due to inadequate biosecurity measures during preparation of the house (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>). A multifactorial approach is therefore needed, improving biosecurity measures and management (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">56</xref>).</p>
<p>Yet, our study also clearly indicated that biosecurity measures on the farm level alone will not be sufficient to stop the introduction of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic>. In 79.3% of the farms, day-old chicks arrived with FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> in their gastrointestinal tracts, confirming previous reports of vertical transmission of these isolates throughout the broiler production pyramid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref15 ref16 ref17">14&#x2013;17</xref>). In our study, the isolates from day-old chicks within the farm clustered together for three out of four farms, from which the isolates were analyzed through WGS. This suggests that a batch of day-old chicks may acquire FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> from a common source or there is clonal spread within a batch of chicks, which could be facilitated through the high density in which the chicks are being held in hatcheries and during transport. A previous study showed the potential entry of <italic>Enterobacterales</italic> from the parent flock into the hatchery, where ESBL-producing <italic>E. coli</italic> were detected on 0.9% of egg surfaces and in the hatchery environment, however, no positive isolates were found in hatchlings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>). The presence of resistant isolates on eggshells of broiler hatching eggs was also detected by Mezhoud et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">57</xref>). A different study focused specifically on quinolone-resistant <italic>E. coli</italic> and conducted longitudinal sampling across all levels of the production pyramid and highlighted the role of environmental recirculation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>). To better understand how and when these chicks are colonized with FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates, further research is needed, particularly investigating the role of the hatchery and (grand)parent stock.</p>
<p>Regarding underlying FQ resistance mechanisms, our study found a substantial number of isolates carrying PMQR genes. Previous studies on FQ dissemination in the broiler production chain did not identify PMQR genes in broiler <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref15 ref16">14&#x2013;16</xref>), likely due to differences in screening methods. For example, these studies selected isolates based on nalidixic acid resistance (&#x003E;16&#x202F;mg/L), but <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates carrying PMQR genes often exhibit only a minor reduction in susceptibility to nalidixic acid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">58</xref>). Our findings corroborate this, as the isolates carrying PMQR genes exhibited lower MIC values to FQ compared to those with QRDR mutations. Although Myren&#x00E5;s et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>) specifically selected FQ isolates with MIC profiles indicative of the presence of PMQR genes (ciprofloxacin MIC &#x2265; 0.06&#x202F;mg/L combined with nalidixic acid MICs 4&#x2013;32&#x202F;mg/L), they could identify only one isolate carrying a <italic>qnrS</italic> gene. De Koster et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">59</xref>) found PMQR genes (<italic>qnrS1</italic>) in 8.9% of the ciprofloxacin resistant <italic>E. coli</italic> broiler isolates, using selective plates supplemented with ciprofloxacin (2&#x202F;mg/L) according to the clinical breakpoint for the detection of FQ isolates. These isolates carried PMQR genes in combination with QRDR mutations. In the study of Temmerman et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>), which only included avian pathogenic <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates collected from colibacillosis outbreaks, PMQR associated genes were found in 18% of non-wild type FQ resistant isolates, of which <italic>qnrS</italic> was detected in 14% and <italic>qnrB</italic> in 4% of the isolates. These different study outcomes suggest that the screening method might play a role in the detection of PMQR genes. Due to the specific selection of isolates in our study, our prevalence rates are not directly comparable to those of other studies.</p>
<p>Additionally, other <italic>Enterobacterales</italic> may contribute to the circulation of AMR in the environment and animals. After a pre-selection for <italic>E. coli</italic> and using WGS, we identified nine FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. fergusonii</italic> isolates, which can be explained by the fact that the MALDI-TOF database only contained one <italic>E. fergusonii</italic> entry and the related software confirmed it as non-distinguishable from <italic>E. coli</italic> due to the close relatedness. Previous studies have confirmed the potential of <italic>E. fergusonii</italic> as a reservoir for AMR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60 ref61 ref62 ref63">60&#x2013;63</xref>). Ferreira et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">64</xref>) described <italic>E. fergusonii</italic> isolates as being multidrug-resistant and also carrying the <italic>qnr</italic>B19 gene. In our study, only QRDR mutations were found in <italic>E. fergusonii</italic> isolates, but further research is needed to determine the role of <italic>E. fergusonii</italic> and other <italic>Enterobacterales</italic> in the dissemination of FQ non-susceptibility.</p>
<p>Regarding the screening of FQ residues, the FQ usage on one farm was confirmed through residue detection in collected feather samples well above the LOQ (50&#x2013;600&#x202F;ng/g feather). On another farm, very low (1.2&#x2013;3.7&#x202F;ng/g feather) flumequine residue concentrations were detected, despite no registered usage. A recent study showed that broilers treated with flumequine in the first 3 days of life had residue levels in feathers ranging from 3.4 to 15&#x202F;ng/g feather on day 38 of the production cycle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>). The low residue levels in the current study could suggest unreported use at the beginning of the production cycle or uptake of residues from the surroundings which could originate from usage in a previous cycle, as FQ have been described to be notoriously stable in the environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">65</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">66</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec21">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The continued presence of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> on broiler farms is likely due to both historical contamination at the farm level and a continuous influx along the production chain. AMU contributes to the continued presence of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> in broiler farms, but accounted for only a small proportion of the variability in FQ non-susceptibility in the currently investigated farms. The role of certain virulence-associated genes in the persistence of FQ non-susceptible <italic>E. coli</italic> in broiler farms deserves more in-depth research. To effectively combat this issue, efforts must focus on preventing the transmission of resistant bacteria, both at the farm level and throughout the broiler production chain, together with further reductions in AMU.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec22">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The data presented in the study are deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under BioProject number PRJNA1192038. The accession numbers can be found in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="sec29">Supplementary Table S8</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec23">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal studies were approved by Ethical committee of the Faculties of Veterinary Medicine and Bioscience engineering of Ghent University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec24">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>MR: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. FB: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. BB: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. MG: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. KV: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. SK: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. IC: Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. NI: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. MD: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. JD: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec25">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Belgian Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment (grant no. RF 19/6334).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>We want to thank the veterinarians and farmers for their help and participation in this study. Also, we are grateful to the microbiology technicians in the participating laboratories for their contribution (to the collection of the microbiological data) and to the technicians of the service Transversal activities in Applied Genomics at Sciensano, Belgium to conduct the NGS. The MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer was financed by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen, Brussels, Belgium) as Hercules project G0H2516N (AUGE/15/05). Fluoroquinolones in feather samples were determined using an UHPLC&#x2013;MS/MS instrument as part of the Ghent University MSsmall Expertise Center for mass spectrometry analysis of small organic molecules.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec26">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec27">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec28">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec29">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1610997/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1610997/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.xlsx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Holmes</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>LSP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sundsfjord</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Steinbakk</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Regmi</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karkey</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Understanding the mechanisms and drivers of antimicrobial resistance</article-title>. <source>Lancet</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>387</volume>:<fpage>176</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00473-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26603922</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roth</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>K&#x00E4;sbohrer</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mayrhofer</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zitz</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hofacre</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Domig</surname> <given-names>KJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The application of antibiotics in broiler production and the resulting antibiotic resistance in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>: a global overview</article-title>. <source>Poult Sci</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>98</volume>:<fpage>1791</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>804</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pey539</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30544256</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Callens</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cargnel</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sarrazin</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dewulf</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoet</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vermeersch</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Associations between a decreased veterinary antimicrobial use and resistance in commensal <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> from Belgian livestock species (2011&#x2013;2015)</article-title>. <source>Prev Vet Med</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>157</volume>:<fpage>50</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.10.013</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30086849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huber</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Agunos</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gow</surname> <given-names>SP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carson</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Boeckel</surname> <given-names>TP</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Reduction in antimicrobial use and resistance to Salmonella, Campylobacter, and <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in broiler chickens, Canada, 2013&#x2013;2019</article-title>. <source>Emerg Infect Dis</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>2434</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3201/eid2709.204395</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>NM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wales</surname> <given-names>AD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ridley</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davies</surname> <given-names>RH</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Farm level risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance in <italic>E. coli</italic> and thermophilic <italic>Campylobacter</italic> spp. on poultry farms</article-title>. <source>Avian Pathol</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>45</volume>:<fpage>559</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/03079457.2016.1185510</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27171857</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Perrin-Guyomard</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jouy</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Urban</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chauvin</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Granier</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mourand</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. Coli and Campylobacter</article-title>. <source>Vet Microbiol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>243</volume>:<fpage>108637</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108637</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32273016</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Koster</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ringenier</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lammens</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stegeman</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tobias</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Velkers</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>ESBL-producing, carbapenem-and ciprofloxacin-resistant <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in Belgian and Dutch broiler and pig farms: a cross-sectional and cross-border study</article-title>. <source>Antibiotics</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>945</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics10080945</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34438995</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bortolaia</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bisgaard</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bojesen</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Distribution and possible transmission of ampicillin-and nalidixic acid-resistant <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> within the broiler industry</article-title>. <source>Vet Microbiol</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>142</volume>:<fpage>379</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.10.024</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19945232</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huijbers</surname> <given-names>PMC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Graat</surname> <given-names>EAM</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Hoek</surname> <given-names>AHAM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Veenman</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Jong</surname> <given-names>MCM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Duijkeren</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Transmission dynamics of extended-spectrum &#x03B2;-lactamase and AmpC &#x03B2;-lactamase-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in a broiler flock without antibiotic use</article-title>. <source>Prev Vet Med</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>131</volume>:<fpage>12</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.07.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27544247</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dierikx</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van der Goot</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fabri</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Essen-Zandbergen</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mevius</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Extended-spectrum-&#x03B2;-lactamase-and AmpC-&#x03B2;-lactamase-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in Dutch broilers and broiler farmers</article-title>. <source>J Antimicrob Chemother</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>68</volume>:<fpage>60</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dks349</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22949623</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gazal</surname> <given-names>LES</given-names></name> <name><surname>Medeiros</surname> <given-names>LP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dibo</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nishio</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koga</surname> <given-names>VL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gon&#x00E7;alves</surname> <given-names>BC</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Detection of ESBL/AmpC-producing and fosfomycin-resistant <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> from different sources in poultry production in southern Brazil</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>604544</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.604544</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Projahn</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daehre</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roesler</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friese</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-and plasmid-encoded cephamycinase-producing enterobacteria in the broiler hatchery as a potential mode of pseudo-vertical transmission</article-title>. <source>Appl Environ Microbiol</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>83</volume>:<fpage>e02364-16</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02364-16</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27795309</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Daehre</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Projahn</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Semmler</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roesler</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friese</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-/AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in broiler farms: transmission dynamics at farm level</article-title>. <source>Microb Drug Resist</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>511</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/mdr.2017.0150</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28981392</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kaspersen</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fiskebeck</surname> <given-names>EZ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sekse</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sletteme&#x00E5;s</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Urdahl</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Norstr&#x00F6;m</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Comparative genome analyses of wild type-and quinolone resistant <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> indicate dissemination of QREC in the Norwegian broiler breeding pyramid</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>938</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.00938</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32508776</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>B&#x00F6;rjesson</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guillard</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Land&#x00E9;n</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bengtsson</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nilsson</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Introduction of quinolone resistant <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> to Swedish broiler population by imported breeding animals</article-title>. <source>Vet Microbiol</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>194</volume>:<fpage>74</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.11.004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26608722</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petersen</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Christensen</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuhnert</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bisgaard</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olsen</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Vertical transmission of a fluoroquinolone-resistant <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> within an integrated broiler operation</article-title>. <source>Vet Microbiol</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>116</volume>:<fpage>120</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.03.015</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16650662</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Myren&#x00E5;s</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sletteme&#x00E5;s</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thorsteinsdottir</surname> <given-names>TR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bengtsson</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x00F6;rjesson</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nilsson</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Clonal spread of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> resistant to cephalosporins and quinolones in the Nordic broiler production</article-title>. <source>Vet Microbiol</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>213</volume>:<fpage>123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.11.015</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29291995</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leclercq</surname> <given-names>SO</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bochereau</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Foubert</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baumard</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Travel</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Doublet</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Persistence of commensal multidrug-resistant <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in the broiler production pyramid is best explained by strain recirculation from the rearing environment</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>1406854</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2024.1406854</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39035436</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Poirel</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cattoir</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nordmann</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance; interactions between human, animal, and environmental ecologies</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>24</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2012.00024</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22347217</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Persoons</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dewulf</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smet</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herman</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heyndricx</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martel</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Antimicrobial use in Belgian broiler production</article-title>. <source>Prev Vet Med</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>105</volume>:<fpage>320</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.02.020</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Joosten</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sarrazin</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Gompel</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luiken</surname> <given-names>REC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mevius</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wagenaar</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Quantitative and qualitative analysis of antimicrobial usage at farm and flock level on 181 broiler farms in nine European countries</article-title>. <source>J Antimicrob Chemother</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>74</volume>:<fpage>798</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>806</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dky498</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30649428</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luyckx</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Weyenberg</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dewulf</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herman</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zoons</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vervaet</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>On-farm comparisons of different cleaning protocols in broiler houses</article-title>. <source>Poult Sci</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>94</volume>:<fpage>1986</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pev143</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ringenier</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cherlet</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dewulf</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Devreese</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Residue depletion of enrofloxacin and flumequine in feathers of broilers based on quantitative UHPLC-MS/MS detection</article-title>. <source>Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>41</volume>:<fpage>1065</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/19440049.2024.2370367</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38935119</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vereecke</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vandekerckhove</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Theuns</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haesebrouck</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boyen</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Whole genome sequencing to study antimicrobial resistance and RTX virulence genes in equine Actinobacillus isolates</article-title>. <source>Vet Res</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>54</volume>:<fpage>33</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13567-023-01160-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37020296</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dame-Korevaar</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fischer</surname> <given-names>EA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van der Goot</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Velkers</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van den Broek</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Veldman</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Effect of challenge dose of plasmid-mediated extended-spectrum &#x03B2;-lactamase and AmpC &#x03B2;-lactamase producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> on time-until-colonization and level of excretion in young broilers</article-title>. <source>Vet Microbiol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>239</volume>:<fpage>108446</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108446</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ibrahim</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boyen</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohsin</surname> <given-names>MAS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ringenier</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berge</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chantziaras</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli and its correlation with antimicrobial use on commercial poultry farms in Bangladesh</article-title>. <source>Antibiotics</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>1361</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics12091361</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37760658</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">EUCAST</collab></person-group>. <source>Antimicrobial wild type distributions of microorganisms</source>. Available online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://mic.eucast.org" ext-link-type="uri">https://mic.eucast.org</ext-link>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><label>28.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bogaerts</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nouws</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verhaegen</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Denayer</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Braekel</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Winand</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Validation strategy of a bioinformatics whole genome sequencing workflow for Shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> using a reference collection extensively characterized with conventional methods</article-title>. <source>Microb Genom.</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>000531</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mgen.0.000531</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33656437</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><label>29.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alikhan</surname> <given-names>NF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohamed</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Achtman</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The entero base user's guide, with case studies on Salmonella transmissions, <italic>Yersinia pestis</italic> phylogeny, and Escherichia core genomic diversity</article-title>. <source>Genome Res</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>138</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.251678.119</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31809257</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><label>30.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dallman</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ashton</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schafer</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jironkin</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Painset</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shaaban</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>A database solution for routine sequencing analysis of bacterial isolates</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>34</volume>:<fpage>3028</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/bty212</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><label>31.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dallman</surname> <given-names>TJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Greig</surname> <given-names>DR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gharbia</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jenkins</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phylogenetic structure of Shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> O157: H7 from sub-lineage to SNPs</article-title>. <source>Microb Genom</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>000544</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mgen.0.000544</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33720818</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><label>32.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>DE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Langmead</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Improved metagenomic analysis with kraken 2</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>257</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31779668</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><label>33.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll2">World Health Organization (WHO)</collab></person-group>. <source>Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine</source>. (<year>2017</year>). Available online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/255027/9789241512220-eng.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/255027/9789241512220-eng.pdf</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><label>34.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll3">World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH)</collab></person-group>. <source>WOAH list of antimicrobial agents of veterinary importance</source> (<year>2024</year>). Available online at: <ext-link xlink:href="http://www.woah.org/app/uploads/2021/06/amended-91gs-tech-03-amr-working-group-report-en.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.woah.org/app/uploads/2021/06/amended-91gs-tech-03-amr-working-group-report-en.pdf</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><label>35.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Temmerman</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garmyn</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antonissen</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vanantwerpen</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vanrobaeys</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haesebrouck</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Evaluation of fluoroquinolone resistance in clinical avian pathogenic <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> isolates from Flanders (Belgium)</article-title>. <source>Antibiotics.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>800</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics9110800</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33198103</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><label>36.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ingram</surname> <given-names>PR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rogers</surname> <given-names>BA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sidjabat</surname> <given-names>HE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gibson</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Inglis</surname> <given-names>TJJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Co-selection may explain high rates of ciprofloxacin non-susceptible <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> from retail poultry reared without prior fluoroquinolone exposure</article-title>. <source>J Med Microbiol</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>62</volume>:<fpage>1743</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/jmm.0.062729-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24136884</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><label>37.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>HX</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>XH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>YN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>WH</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Multiple transmissible genes encoding fluoroquinolone and third-generation cephalosporin resistance co-located in non-typhoidal Salmonella isolated from food-producing animals in China</article-title>. <source>Int J Antimicrob Agents</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>43</volume>:<fpage>242</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.12.005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24581597</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><label>38.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Apostolakos</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feudi</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eichhorn</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Palmieri</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fasolato</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwarz</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>High-resolution characterisation of ESBL/pAmpC-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> isolated from the broiler production pyramid</article-title>. <source>Sci Rep</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>11123</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-68036-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32636426</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><label>39.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ossa-Trujillo</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vinasco</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jordan</surname> <given-names>ER</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garc&#x00ED;a Buitrago</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hagevoort</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Use of critically important antimicrobial classes early in life may adversely impact bacterial resistance profiles during adult years: potential co-selection for plasmid-borne fluoroquinolone and macrolide resistance via extended-spectrum beta-lactam use in dairy cattle</article-title>. <source>Lett Appl Microbiol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>72</volume>:<fpage>220</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/lam.13419</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33098671</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><label>40.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hellweger</surname> <given-names>FL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Escherichia coli</italic> adapts to tetracycline resistance plasmid (pBR322) by mutating endogenous potassium transport: in silico hypothesis testing</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol Ecol</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>83</volume>:<fpage>622</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1574-6941.12019</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23020150</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><label>41.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nakayama</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamamoto</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohata</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamaguchi</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jinnai</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Minh</surname> <given-names>DT</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Common presence of plasmid encoding bla<sub>CTX-M-55</sub> in extended-spectrum &#x03B2;-lactamase-producing Salmonella enterica and <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> isolates from the same edible river fish</article-title>. <source>J Microorg Control</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4265/jmc.28.2_49</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><label>42.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marcusson</surname> <given-names>LL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frimodt-M&#x00F8;ller</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hughes</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Interplay in the selection of fluoroquinolone resistance and bacterial fitness</article-title>. <source>PLoS Pathog</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>e1000541</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1000541</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19662169</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><label>43.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Machuca</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Briales</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Labrador</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>D&#x00ED;az-de-Alba</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x00F3;pez-Rojas</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Docobo-P&#x00E9;rez</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Interplay between plasmid-mediated and chromosomal-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance and bacterial fitness in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>J Antimicrob Chemother</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>69</volume>:<fpage>3203</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dku308</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><label>44.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kemmett</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Humphrey</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rushton</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Close</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wigley</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>NJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A longitudinal study simultaneously exploring the carriage of APEC virulence associated genes and the molecular epidemiology of faecal and systemic <italic>E. coli</italic> in commercial broiler chickens</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>e67749</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0067749</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23825682</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><label>45.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rehman</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rempel</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carrillo</surname> <given-names>CD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ziebell</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manges</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Virulence genotype and phenotype of multiple antimicrobial-resistant <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> isolates from broilers assessed from a &#x201C;one-health&#x201D; perspective</article-title>. <source>J Food Prot</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>85</volume>:<fpage>336</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/JFP-21-273</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34762732</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><label>46.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ovi</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nabors</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adhikari</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A compilation of virulence-associated genes that are frequently reported in avian pathogenic <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (APEC) compared to other <italic>E. coli</italic></article-title>. <source>J Appl Microbiol</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>134</volume>:<fpage>lxad 014</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jambio/lxad014</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36754368</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><label>47.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Projahn</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daehre</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Semmler</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guenther</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roesler</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friese</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Environmental adaptation and vertical dissemination of ESBL&#x2212;/pA mp C-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in an integrated broiler production chain in the absence of an antibiotic treatment</article-title>. <source>Microb Biotechnol</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>1017</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1751-7915.13040</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29345080</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><label>48.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pakbin</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Br&#x00FC;ck</surname> <given-names>WM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rossen</surname> <given-names>JWA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Virulence factors of enteric pathogenic <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>: a review</article-title>. <source>Int J Mol Sci</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>22</volume>:<fpage>9922</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms22189922</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34576083</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><label>49.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Elsas</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Semenov</surname> <given-names>AV</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trevors</surname> <given-names>JT</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Survival of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in the environment: fundamental and public health aspects</article-title>. <source>ISME J</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2010.80</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20574458</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><label>50.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Oliveira</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rocha</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Finkler</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Moraes</surname> <given-names>LB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barbieri</surname> <given-names>NL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pavanelo</surname> <given-names>DB</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Prevalence of col V plasmid-linked genes and in vivo pathogenicity of avian strains of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>Foodborne Pathog Dis</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>679</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>85</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/fpd.2014.1934</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26258262</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><label>51.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vila</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x00E1;ez-L&#x00F3;pez</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name> <name><surname>R&#x00F6;mling</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dobrindt</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cant&#x00F3;n</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Escherichia coli</italic>: an old friend with new tidings</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol Rev</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>437</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsre/fuw005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28201713</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><label>52.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kaspersen</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sekse</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fiskebeck</surname> <given-names>EZ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sletteme&#x00E5;s</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simm</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Norstr&#x00F6;m</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Dissemination of quinolone-resistant <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in the Norwegian broiler and pig production chains and possible persistence in the broiler production environment</article-title>. <source>Appl Environ Microbiol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>86</volume>:<fpage>e02769-02719</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02769-19</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><label>53.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luyckx</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Coillie</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dewulf</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Weyenberg</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herman</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zoons</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Identification and biocide susceptibility of dominant bacteria after cleaning and disinfection of broiler houses</article-title>. <source>Poult Sci</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>96</volume>:<fpage>938</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pew355</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28158762</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><label>54.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maertens</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Reu</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Weyenberg</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Coillie</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meyer</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Meirhaeghe</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Evaluation of the hygienogram scores and related data obtained after cleaning and disinfection of poultry houses in Flanders during the period 2007 to 2014</article-title>. <source>Poult Sci</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>97</volume>:<fpage>620</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pex327</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29211907</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><label>55.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Da Costa</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bica</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vaz-Pires</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernardo</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. and <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> isolated from poultry feed and feed ingredients</article-title>. <source>Vet Microbiol</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>120</volume>:<fpage>122</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.10.005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17098382</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><label>56.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rob&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Projahn</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boll</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blasse</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Merle</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roesler</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Survival of highly related ESBL-and pAmpC-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in broiler farms identified before and after cleaning and disinfection using cg MLST</article-title>. <source>BMC Microbiol</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>143</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12866-024-03292-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38664628</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><label>57.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mezhoud</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chantziaras</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iguer-Ouada</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moula</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garmyn</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martel</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Presence of antimicrobial resistance in coliform bacteria from hatching broiler eggs with emphasis on ESBL/AmpC-producing bacteria</article-title>. <source>Avian Pathol</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>45</volume>:<fpage>493</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>500</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/03079457.2016.1167837</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><label>58.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Veldman</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cavaco</surname> <given-names>LM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mevius</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Battisti</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franco</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Botteldoorn</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>International collaborative study on the occurrence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in Salmonella enterica and <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> isolated from animals, humans, food and the environment in 13 European countries</article-title>. <source>J Antimicrob Chemother</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>66</volume>:<fpage>1278</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dkr084</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><label>59.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Koster</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ringenier</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xavier</surname> <given-names>BB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lammens</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Coninck</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Bruyne</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Genetic characterization of ESBL-producing and ciprofloxacin-resistant <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> from Belgian broilers and pigs</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>1150470</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1150470</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37089550</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><label>60.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Srinivas</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghatak</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pyngrope</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Angappan</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Milton</surname> <given-names>AAP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Avian strains of emerging pathogen <italic>Escherichia fergusonii</italic> are phylogenetically diverse and harbor the greatest AMR dissemination potential among different sources: comparative genomic evidence</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>1080677</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.1080677</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36741902</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><label>61.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Galetti</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Penha Filho</surname> <given-names>RAC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferreira</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Am</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Darini</surname> <given-names>ALC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Antibiotic resistance and heavy metal tolerance plasmids: the antimicrobial bulletproof properties of <italic>Escherichia fergusonii</italic> isolated from poultry</article-title>. <source>Infect Drug Resist</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>1029</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/IDR.S196411</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31190902</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><label>62.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Escherichia fergusonii</italic>, an underrated repository for antimicrobial resistance in food animals</article-title>. <source>Microbiol Spectr</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>e01617-21</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/spectrum.01617-21</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><label>63.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Forgetta</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rempel</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Malouin</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vaillancourt</surname> <given-names>R</given-names> <suffix>Jr</suffix></name> <name><surname>Topp</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dewar</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Pathogenic and multidrug-resistant <italic>Escherichia fergusonii</italic> from broiler chicken</article-title>. <source>Poult Sci</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>91</volume>:<fpage>512</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.2011-01738</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22252367</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><label>64.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferreira</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Penha Filho</surname> <given-names>RAC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuaye</surname> <given-names>APY</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andrade</surname> <given-names>LN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berchieri Junior</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Da Costa Darini</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Identification and characterization of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants in Enterobacteriaceae isolated from healthy poultry in Brazil</article-title>. <source>Infect Genet Evol</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>60</volume>:<fpage>66</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.meegid.2018.02.003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29427764</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><label>65.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhatt</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chatterjee</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Fluoroquinolone antibiotics: occurrence, mode of action, resistance, environmental detection, and remediation&#x2013;a comprehensive review</article-title>. <source>Environ Pollut</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>315</volume>:<fpage>120440</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120440</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36265724</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><label>66.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schulz</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kemper</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hartung</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Janusch</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohring</surname> <given-names>SAI</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamscher</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Analysis of fluoroquinolones in dusts from intensive livestock farming and the co-occurrence of fluoroquinolone-resistant <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>Sci Rep</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>5117</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-41528-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30914675</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>