<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Vet. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Veterinary Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Vet. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2297-1769</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2024.1472979</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Veterinary Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Recombinant MS087-based indirect ELISA for the diagnosis of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Yang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0003"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Yan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0003"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2810733/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Jiawei</given-names></name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>Jiacui</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2126295/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>Honglei</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/964936/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>Laboratory of Veterinary Mycoplasmology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Southwest University</institution>, <addr-line>Chongqing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0004"><p>Edited by: David C. B. Taras, Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0005"><p>Reviewed by: Tesfaye Gelanew, Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Ethiopia</p><p>Michael Gassel, Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Honglei Ding, <email>hongleiding@swu.edu.cn</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn0003"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>29</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<elocation-id>1472979</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>30</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>14</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2024 Zhang, Wu, He, Lai and Ding.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zhang, Wu, He, Lai and Ding</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Accurate detection is a prerequisite for effective prevention and control of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> infection. ELISA is the most popular method for the clinical detection of <italic>M. synoviae</italic> because of its convenience, low cost, and high detection rate. However, the cross-reactivity of commercially available ELISA kits with other avian pathogen-positive sera needs to be addressed. The aim of this study was to establish an ELISA method with high specificity for the detection of anti-<italic>M. synoviae</italic> antibodies in chicken serum to evaluate the <italic>M. synoviae</italic> infection status on poultry farms. The recombinant MS087 (rMS087) protein was expressed in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> BL21 (DE3) and purified by Ni<sup>2+</sup> affinity chromatography. An antibody against rMS087 was generated by immunizing BALB/c mice. Bioinformatic analysis revealed that MS087 was conserved among <italic>M. synoviae</italic> strains. Western blotting and indirect immunofluorescence results indicated that MS087 was not only localized in the cytoplasm and on the membrane but also secreted by the organism. For the established ELISA method based on rMS087, the optimal antigen concentration, blocking buffer, blocking duration, serum dilution, serum incubation duration, secondary antibody dilution, secondary antibody incubation duration and colorimetric reaction duration were 2&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL, 1% BSA, 3&#x2009;h, 1:500, 1.5&#x2009;h, 1:20,000, 2&#x2009;h and 5&#x2009;min, respectively. Validation of the rMS087-based ELISA revealed a cut-off value of 0.5. The coefficients of variation of both the intra-batch and inter-batch methods were less than 9%. The assay was able to differentiate positive serum against <italic>M. synoviae</italic> from antisera against nine other avian pathogens and was able to recognize <italic>M. synoviae</italic>-positive sera at a dilution of 1:1,000. Compared with the commercial ELISA method, the rMS087-based ELISA has the potential to recognize more positive sera against <italic>M. synoviae</italic>. Collectively, the rMS087-based ELISA is a reproducible, specific, and sensitive serological method for detecting antibodies against <italic>M. synoviae</italic> in chicken serum and has robust potential for large-scale serological epidemiology of <italic>M. synoviae</italic> infection on poultry farms.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>subcellular localization</kwd>
<kwd>working condition</kwd>
<kwd>reproducibility</kwd>
<kwd>cross-reactivity</kwd>
<kwd>sensitivity</kwd>
<kwd>specificity</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="45"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="7144"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Veterinary Infectious Diseases</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p><italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> is a widespread pathogen in the poultry industry. It was first reported to be associated with the occurrence of infectious synovitis in chickens in the USA in the early 1950s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>) and was proven to be the causative organism for hemagglutination of red blood cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>). In addition to acute/chronic respiratory disease, air sacculitis and/or articular lesions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>), <italic>M. synoviae</italic> infection often results in reduced growth, production, and hatchability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>). Moreover, many studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6 ref7 ref8">6&#x2013;8</xref>) have described the association between the presence of <italic>M. synoviae</italic> in the oviduct and the production of eggs with eggshell apex abnormalities (EAA) by laying hens, characterized by an altered shell surface, shell thinning, increased translucency (detectable macroscopically, particularly upon candling), and the occurrence of cracks and breaks. <italic>M. synoviae</italic> is transmitted both horizontally and vertically, and its prevalence appears to be increasing worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>). Since 2010, this pathogen has been widely prevalent in broiler flocks in mainland China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>) and has subsequently rapidly spread to layer flocks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>).</p>
<p>Generally, <italic>M. synoviae</italic> infection can be controlled by three general approaches: biosecurity measures, medication with antimicrobials, and vaccination with commercial or autogenous vaccines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>). Several studies reported a temporary effect of antimicrobial treatments in EAA-affected layer flocks, with a decreased number of broken or downgraded eggs during treatment, but a disappearance of this effect 1&#x2013;2&#x2009;weeks after the end of treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>) because the organism entered cells after infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref15 ref16">14&#x2013;16</xref>). Although the live vaccine (MS-H) developed in Australia alleviates clinical symptoms and pathological damage and improves production performance in chickens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>), it is used only in <italic>M. synoviae</italic>-free flocks and cannot block infection by wild-type strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>). Therefore, eradication measures, combined with biosafety regulations, constitute most cost-effective strategy for preventing and controlling <italic>M. synoviae</italic> infection.</p>
<p>In general, the most crucial step for the eradication of infectious disease is the use of appropriate diagnostic reagents. Serological tests are considered indispensable and cost-effective tools. Several serological tests, including rapid plate agglutination (RPA), hemagglutination inhibition (HI), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), have been developed for monitoring <italic>M. synoviae</italic> infection in chicken flocks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21 ref22 ref23">21&#x2013;23</xref>). ELISA has been reported to have higher specificity than RPA and higher sensitivity than HI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>). Several ELISAs based on whole cells or membrane proteins have been developed to detect antibodies against <italic>M. synoviae</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24 ref25 ref26">24&#x2013;26</xref>). However, the cross-reactivity and nonspecific reactions of these ELISAs with <italic>Mycoplasma gallisepticum</italic> have impeded the development of specific serodiagnostic tests (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>).</p>
<p>A more specific ELISA was developed by using the MSPB protein, which is cleaved from the amino terminus of VlhA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>), and the cross-reactivity of the method with sera against <italic>M. gallisepticum</italic> was overcome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>). However, the coating antigen shows a high degree of amino acid variability between strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">29</xref>) or even clonal isolates from a single strain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">30</xref>), which affects the sensitivity of the established ELISA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>). Recently, the membrane protein LP78, which binds to fibronectin and plasminogen, was used as the diagnostic antigen. Compared with commercial ELISA kits, although no cross-reactivity was observed with other poultry pathogen-positive sera, especially <italic>M. gallisepticum</italic>-positive sera, LP78-based ELISA demonstrated lower sensitivity in the detection of <italic>M. synoviae</italic>-positive serum samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>). Therefore, it is necessary to develop a novel serological method with good specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of <italic>M. synoviae</italic> infection.</p>
<p>In general, membrane proteins are commonly used as targets for serological diagnoses. We found a <italic>M. synoviae</italic> protein MS087, which is predicted to be an F1-like ATPase-associated subunit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>), was localized in both the cytoplasm and membrane and is even secreted from the organism. In this study, we used MS087 as the coating antigen to develop an indirect ELISA to detect antibodies in chicken serum against <italic>M. synoviae</italic>, and provide a specific tool for the investigation of the epidemiology of <italic>M. synoviae</italic> in chicken farms.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Bacterial strains, plasmid, sera, and culture conditions</title>
<p><italic>M. synoviae</italic> strain CQTL01 was isolated from the synovial fluid of a Three-Yellow broiler in China in 2022. The strain was subsequently grown in KM2 medium (Tuopu, Zhaoyuan, Shandong, China) supplemented with 20% porcine serum (Jianglai, Shanghai, China) and 0.01% NAD (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) at 37&#x00B0;C. The <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> strains DH5&#x03B1; and BL21(DE3) were grown in Luria&#x2013;Bertani (LB) broth or on solid medium. The pET-30a(+) expression vector was preserved by our laboratory. Three hundred and sixty-eight serum samples were collected from five commercial poultry farms and two poultry slaughterhouses and were assessed with a <italic>M. synoviae</italic> ELISA antibody test kit (IDEXX, Westbrook, ME, USA) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). Chicken sera against other avian pathogens, including <italic>M. gallisepticum</italic>, <italic>Avibacterium paragallinarum</italic> (AP) serovars A, B and C, <italic>Salmonella</italic> Pullorum-Gallinarum (SPG), Newcastle disease virus (NDV), and avian influenza virus (AIV) subtypes H5, H7 and H9, respectively, were purchased from Harbin National Engineering Research Center of the Veterinary Biologics Corp in China.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Information on chicken sera collected from five poultry farms and two poultry slaughterhouses.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Poultry farm/slaughterhouse</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Sera from broilers</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Sera from laying hens</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Total</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Positive</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Negative</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Positive</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Negative</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Poultry farm 1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Poultry farm 2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">64</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">64</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Poultry farm 3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Poultry farm 4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Poultry farm 5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Slaughterhouse 1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">37</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">58</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Slaughterhouse 2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">126</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Total</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">155</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">36</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">174</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">368</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Bioinformatic analysis</title>
<p>The full-length sequence of the gene encoding <italic>ms087</italic> in the CQTL01 strain was obtained from the genome sequence (The data have been deposited in China National Center for Bioinformation, run accession: CRR1309196). The molecular weight (MW) of MS087 was computed with Detaibio.<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn0001"><sup>1</sup></xref> BLASTP<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn0002"><sup>2</sup></xref> was used to carry out amino acid identity matching with sequences retrieved from the NCBI database. The predictor SignalP 6.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>) was used to detect the presence of the signal peptide. TMHMM 2.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">34</xref>) was applied to predict transmembrane helices. The computational online software programs CELLO v.2.5 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>) and Gpos-mPLoc (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>) were used to directly predict the subcellular localization of the protein. The immunogenicity of the protein was calculated by VaxiJen V2.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">37</xref>) using the default parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Cloning, expression and purification of <italic>M. synoviae</italic> rMS087</title>
<p>On the basis of the <italic>ms087</italic> gene sequence from the CQTL01 strain, two primers (ms087-F: CGCGGATCCATGAAAATAAAAAAACT TTTATCTTTTGC and ms087-R: CCGCTCGAGATCATTTGC AAAATTAGTTAAATAAGT) were designed and synthesized. The genomic DNA of the CQTL01 strain was extracted using a TIANamp bacteria DNA kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). The <italic>ms087</italic> gene was amplified with <italic>ApexHF</italic> HS DNA Polymerase FS Master Mix (Accurate, Changsha, Hunan, China) by using the genomic DNA of CQTL01 as the template. After purification, the PCR product was digested with <italic>Bam</italic>H I and <italic>Xho</italic>I and ligated to the expression vector pET-30a(+). The recombinant plasmid was subsequently transformed into <italic>E. coli</italic> DH5&#x03B1; and BL21 (DE3) competent cells via the heat shock method. Recombinant MS087 (rMS087) was expressed by induction with 1&#x2009;mmol/L isopropyl <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 16&#x00B0;C for 20&#x2009;h on a shaker at 200&#x2009;r&#x00B7;min<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. After induction, the expression and expression form of rMS087 in the recombinant bacteria were examined via 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate&#x2013;polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS&#x2013;PAGE) and Western blotting with a mouse anti-His tag antibody (Bioss, Beijing, China). Soluble rMS087 was purified with Ni-NTA HisTrap&#x2122;HP (Cytiva, Shanghai, China), and the concentration of purified recombinant protein was measured via a BCA protein assay kit (Epizyme Biotech, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Raising polyclonal antisera against rMS087</title>
<p>Fifty micrograms of purified rMS087 protein at a concentration of 1&#x2009;mg/mL emulsified with an equal volume of Freund&#x2019;s complete adjuvant (BioFROXX, Beijing, China) was used to immunize female BALB/c mice aged 7&#x2009;weeks via multipoint subcutaneous injection into groins and back. Booster dose of 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;g of emulsified rMS087 protein with an equal volume of Freund&#x2019;s incomplete adjuvant were applied on days 21 and 28 after the first immunization, and additional booster dose of 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;g of purified rMS087 protein was applied on days 35 and 42 after the first immunization, respectively. The day before each immunization, blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital sinus. On day 49 after the first immunization, blood samples were collected from the eyeballs and the mice were euthanized. A specific antibody against rMS087 in sera were evaluated via indirect ELISA. Briefly, 96-well ELISA plates (Corning Incorporated, Kennebunk, ME, USA) were coated with 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of purified rMS087 protein (0.5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL) in 0.05&#x2009;mol/L carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4&#x00B0;C after incubation at 37&#x00B0;C for 1&#x2009;h. Then, the plates were blocked with 5% skim milk diluted with PBS and subsequently incubated with serially diluted sera (from 1:500 to 1:2,048,000). The produced antisera were used for identification of the distribution of MS087 in <italic>M. synoviae</italic>. The protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Southwest University (IACUC No. IACUC-20240322-01).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Identification of the subcellular localization of MS087 in <italic>M. synoviae</italic></title>
<p>To determine the distribution of MS087 in <italic>M. synoviae</italic>, an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and Western blotting were performed. Suspension IFA was performed as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">38</xref>). Briefly, 50&#x2009;mL of <italic>M. synoviae</italic> strain CQTL01 cultured in the late logarithmic growth phase was collected and washed three times with PBS by centrifugation. Afterward, the cells were incubated with mouse anti-rMS087 polyclonal antiserum or preimmune serum diluted at 1:10,000 with PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) overnight at 4&#x00B0;C with shaking at 70&#x2009;r&#x00B7;min<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. After washing, the cells were incubated with a 1:300 dilution of CoraLite488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG(H&#x2009;+&#x2009;L) (Proteintech, Wuhan, Hubei, China).</p>
<p>The cytoplasmic and membrane fractions of <italic>M. synoviae</italic> strain CQTL01 were separated using a membrane and cytoplasmic protein extraction kit (Biosharp, Hefei, Anhui, China) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol. The supernatant of the culture medium after centrifugation was also collected. The cytoplasmic fraction and the culture supernatant were concentrated with a membrane and cytoplasmic protein extraction kit before SDS&#x2013;PAGE. Proteins from different fractions were loaded onto an SDS&#x2013;PAGE gel and subjected to electrophoresis. The proteins were subsequently transferred to a PVDF membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk in TBST (pH 7.2) for 2&#x2009;h at room temperature (RT). The membrane was then incubated with mouse anti-rMS087 polyclonal antiserum (1:10,000) in 5% skim milk diluted with TBST overnight at 4&#x00B0;C to block nonspecific binding. The samples were subsequently incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H&#x2009;+&#x2009;L) (1:10,000) (ABclonal, Wuhan, Hubei, China) at RT for 1&#x2009;h. The protein bands were visualized using an ultra-enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent (Biosharp, Hefei, Anhui, China).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Optimization of the ELISA procedure and working conditions</title>
<p>Three <italic>M. synoviae</italic>-negative serum samples were collected from broilers, three <italic>M. synoviae</italic>-positive serum samples were obtained from broilers, and three <italic>M. synoviae</italic>-positive serum samples were drawn from laying hens. The status of the sera was confirmed with an IDEXX <italic>M. synoviae</italic> ELISA antibody test kit. Therefore, in this assay, three serum samples were used as negative controls and six serum samples were designated positive controls according to the results from the commercial ELISA antibody test kit.</p>
<p>Briefly, the wells of microtiter plates (Corning Incorporated, Kennebunk, ME, USA) were coated with 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of rMS087 protein at concentrations from 0.05&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL to 8&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL in 0.05&#x2009;mol/L carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) at 37&#x00B0;C for 1&#x2009;h and then at 4&#x00B0;C overnight. After the unbound antigen was discarded, the wells were washed five times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBST). Nonspecific binding was blocked by incubation with 200&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of PBST, 1% BSA, 1% ovalbumin (OVA), 2.5% skim milk, or 1% gelatin at 37&#x00B0;C for 0.5&#x2009;h to 4&#x2009;h. After five washes with PBST, 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of each serum sample (diluted from 1:50 to 1:8,000 in blocking buffer) was added and incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 0.5&#x2009;h to 3&#x2009;h. After five washes, 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of HRP-conjugated goat anti-chicken IgG(H&#x2009;+&#x2009;L) secondary antibody (Bioss, Beijing, China) (diluted from 1:5,000 to 1:640,000) was added and incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 0.5&#x2013;3&#x2009;h. After washing with PBST, 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of substrate A (100&#x2009;mL H<sub>2</sub>O containing 2.72&#x2009;g of anhydrous sodium acetate, 0.35&#x2009;g of citric acid monohydrate, 0.06&#x2009;mL of 30% hydrogen peroxide) and substrate B (100&#x2009;mL H<sub>2</sub>O containing 0.04&#x2009;g of EDTA&#x00B7;Na<sub>2</sub>, 0.2078&#x2009;g of citric acid monohydrate, 10&#x2009;mL of glycerol, 0.0391&#x2009;g of TMB&#x00B7;2HCl) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">39</xref>) were added, the mixture was incubated at RT for 5&#x2013;30&#x2009;min, and the reaction was ended with the addition of 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of 2&#x2009;mol/L H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>. The optical density at 450&#x2009;nm (OD<sub>450</sub>) was recorded with an ELISA plate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ratastie 2, FI-01620 Vantaa, Finland). Each experiment was performed at least three times, and all samples were assayed in triplicate. The working conditions were optimized by determining the highest <italic>M. synoviae</italic>-positive (P)-to-negative (N) serum OD<sub>450</sub> ratios.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Calculation of the cut-off value</title>
<p>Three hundred and sixty-eight chicken serum samples were tested via the ELISA method established in this study, with three replicates for each serum sample. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated via GraphPad Prism 8.0 software on the basis of the average OD<sub>450</sub> values determined for the serum samples, with the value generated at the maximum value of the Youden index was set as the cut-off value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">40</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">41</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Evaluation of reproducibility</title>
<p>Reproducibility, i.e., intra- and inter-assay variation, between runs was determined as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">39</xref>), with minor modifications. In brief, four <italic>M. synoviae</italic>-negative and four <italic>M. synoviae</italic>-positive serum samples identified by both the commercial ELISA antibody test kit and the rMS087-based ELISA antibody test method were selected randomly for reproducibility experiments. Five replicates of each sample in the same batch were chosen for the intra-assay (within plate) variation assessment, and three plates from different batches were chosen for the inter-assay (between runs) variation assessment. The coefficient of variations (CVs) were calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>2.9</label>
<title>Cross-reactivity with positive sera against other avian pathogens</title>
<p>The cross-reactivity of the established ELISA method with other avian pathogen-positive sera was investigated by using positive sera against <italic>M. gallisepticum</italic>, <italic>Salmonella</italic> Pullorum-Gallinarum, <italic>A. paragallinarum</italic> serovars A, B, and C, Newcastle disease virus, and avian influenza virus subtypes H5, H7 and H9. Two <italic>M. synoviae</italic>-negative and two <italic>M. synoviae</italic>-positive serum samples confirmed by both the IDEXX <italic>M. synoviae</italic> ELISA antibody test kit and the ELISA antibody test method established in this study were used as controls.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>2.10</label>
<title>Maximum dilution of sera</title>
<p>Five <italic>M. synoviae</italic>-positive serum samples were diluted with blocking buffer as follows: 1:500, 1:1,000, 1:2,000, 1:4,000, 1:8,000, 1:16,000, 1:32,000, and 1:64,000. Then, ELISA was carried out with the optimal working conditions except for the optimal dilution of the serum. The maximum dilution of sera for the ELISA was assessed according to the cut-off value.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>2.11</label>
<title>Serum test</title>
<p>Anti-<italic>M. synoviae</italic> antibodies were tested in 368 chicken serum samples via both a commercial ELISA antibody test kit and the rMS087-based ELISA antibody test method, with three replicates for each serum sample.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec14">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Bioinformatic analysis</title>
<p>The full length of the <italic>ms087</italic> gene in the <italic>M. synoviae</italic> CQTL01 strain was 606&#x2009;bp, and the gene did not contain a TGA codon, encoding tryptophan in <italic>Mycoplasma</italic>. The amino acid sequence shared over 97% homology with proteins of <italic>M. synoviae</italic> strains deposited in the GenBank database and had no more than 40% homology with the proteins of other <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> species according to the BLAST analysis (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). For example, the amino acid sequence of <italic>M. synoviae</italic> had no more than 32% homology with the amino acid sequence of <italic>M. meleagridis</italic> and had no more than 21% homology with the amino acid sequence of <italic>M. canis</italic>. The ORF was predicted to encode a protein containing 201 amino acids with a MW of 23&#x2009;kDa. The amino acid sequence of the MS087 protein was predicted to possess a signal peptide cleaved by signal peptidase I of the Sec translocator (the cleavage site is between amino acid positions 24 and 25) but lacked a transmembrane domain. Both CELLO v.2.5 and Gpos-mPLoc calculated that MS087 could be secreted by the organism as an extracellular protein. However, MS087 was predicted to have an antigenicity score of 0.3061 (the threshold score for antigenicity is 0.4).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Expression and purification of the rMS087</title>
<p>The full-length <italic>ms087</italic> gene was amplified from the CQTL01 strain via PCR (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>) and then cloned and inserted into the pET-30a(+) vector, which was subsequently successfully transformed into <italic>E. coli</italic> BL21(DE3) competent cells. After IPTG induction of the transformed cells, His-tagged rMS087 was expressed in soluble and inclusion body forms by the recombinant bacteria harboring the <italic>ms087</italic> gene (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1B</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">C</xref>) and the purity of soluble rMS087 after purification was confirmed by SDS&#x2013;PAGE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Cloning of the <italic>ms087</italic> gene and expression and purification of the rMS087 protein. (A) PCR amplification of the <italic>ms087</italic> gene by using the genomic DNA of the <italic>M. synoviae</italic> CQTL01 strain as the template. The electrophoresis was performed via an agarose gel. Lane M: DNA marker; lane 1: <italic>ms087</italic> gene. (B) Identification of the expression form of rMS087 in recombinant bacteria by SDS&#x2013;PAGE. (C) Identification of the expression form of rMS087 in recombinant bacteria by Western blotting with a mouse anti-His tag antibody. (B,C) Lane M: protein marker; lane 1: <italic>E. coli</italic> BL21 (DE3) containing the pET-30a(+) plasmid; lane 2: total cell lysate of the recombinant bacteria without IPTG induction; lane 3: total cell lysate of the recombinant bacteria induced by IPTG; lane 4: the supernatant of the cell lysate of the recombinant bacteria induced by IPTG; lane 5: the precipitate of the cell lysate of the recombinant bacteria induced by IPTG. (D) Recombinant MS087 protein purified by Ni<sup>2+</sup> affinity chromatography. The supernatant of the cell lysate was loaded onto (Lane 1) and flowed through (Lane 2) the column. The column was subsequently washed with a linear imidazole gradient of 0.1&#x2009;mol/L (Lane 3), 0.2&#x2009;mol/L (Lane 4) and 0.3&#x2009;mol/L (Lane 5), and the purified protein was collected (Lane 6). (B&#x2013;D) Five microliters of sample (1&#x2009;mg/mL) was loaded into each lane of the SDS&#x2013;PAGE gel, and the proteins in the SDS&#x2013;PAGE gel were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining (B,D).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-11-1472979-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Production of polyclonal antiserum against rMS087</title>
<p>Purified rMS087 was used to generate rMS087 antiserum by immunization of BALB/c mice. The titers of the anti-rMS087 antibody in the sera of 5&#x2009;mice were 1:1,024,000, 1:512,000, 1:256,000, 1:25,600, and 1:512,000. Antiserum with an antibody titer of 1:1,024,000 was used randomly for the subsequent experiments, and this antiserum could react with rMS087 of the recombinant bacteria (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Identification of the subcellular localization of MS087 in <italic>M. synoviae</italic> by IFA and Western blotting. (A) Identification of the expression form of rMS087 in recombinant bacteria by Western blotting with a mouse anti-rMS087 antibody. Lane M: protein marker; lane 1: <italic>E. coli</italic> BL21 (DE3) containing the pET-30a(+) plasmid; lane 2: total cell lysate of the recombinant bacteria without IPTG induction; lane 3: total cell lysate of the recombinant bacteria induced by IPTG; lane 4: the supernatant of the cell lysate of the recombinant bacteria induced by IPTG; lane 5: the precipitate of the cell lysate of the recombinant bacteria induced by IPTG. (B) MS087 was localized on the surface of the <italic>M. synoviae</italic> strain CQTL01. (C) Analysis of the localization of MS087 by Western blotting. Lane M: protein marker; lane 1: whole cells; lane 2: cytoplasmic fraction; lane 3: membrane fraction; lane 4: culture medium supernatant. (A,C) Five microliters of sample (1&#x2009;mg/mL) was loaded into each lane of the SDS&#x2013;PAGE gel.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-11-1472979-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Distribution of MS087 in <italic>M. synoviae</italic></title>
<p>IFA and Western blotting were performed to determine the distribution of MS087 in <italic>M. synoviae</italic> via the mouse anti-rMS087 polyclonal antiserum. In the suspension IFA, green fluorescent puncta were observed on the surface of the CQTL01 strain after incubation with mouse anti-rMS087 serum, whereas no fluorescent signal was observed after incubation with preimmune mouse serum (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>). These results implied that MS087 was localized on the surface of <italic>M. synoviae</italic>. The distribution of MS087 in <italic>M. synoviae</italic> was subsequently analyzed via Western blotting (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>). The mouse anti-rMS087 serum reacted with whole cell proteins, as well as membrane, cytoplasmic and extracellular proteins, at approximately 31&#x2009;kDa, suggesting that MS087 is present in both the membrane and cytoplasm of <italic>M. synoviae</italic> and can even be secreted from the organism.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Optimization of the working conditions of the rMS087-based ELISA method for the detection of antiserum against <italic>M. synoviae</italic></title>
<p>Optimization of the working conditions for the detection of anti-<italic>M. synoviae</italic> antibodies in chicken sera involves the optimal antigen concentration, blocking buffer, blocking duration, serum dilution, serum incubation duration, secondary antibody dilution, secondary antibody incubation duration, and colorimetric reaction duration. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>, 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of purified rMS087, adjusted to a concentration of 2&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL with 0.05&#x2009;mol/L carbonate buffer, was added to each well. After the unbound antigen was discarded, 200&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of 1% BSA diluted with PBS (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref>) was used to block nonspecific binding at 37&#x00B0;C for 3&#x2009;h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C</xref>). The optimal dilution of serum with 1% BSA was 1:500 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref>), and the optimal incubation time for the serum samples was 1.5&#x2009;h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3E</xref>). As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3F</xref>, the P/N ratio increased with increasing HRP-conjugated goat anti-chicken IgG (H&#x2009;+&#x2009;L) secondary antibody dilution, reached a maximum at 1:20,000 and subsequently decreased with increasing serum dilution. Moreover, the highest P/N ratio was obtained after incubation with the secondary antibody for 2&#x2009;h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3G</xref>). Finally, the highest P/N value was obtained when the enzyme reacted with the substrate for 5&#x2009;min (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3H</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Optimal working conditions of the ELISA method for detection of anti-<italic>M. synoviae</italic> antibodies on the basis of the rMS087 protein. The optimal antigen concentration was 2&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL in the coating buffer (A). The optimal blocking buffer was 1% BSA dissolved in PBS (B), and the optimal incubation duration for the blocking step was 3&#x2009;h (C). The optimal dilutions of serum and secondary antibodies were 1:500 (D) and 1:20,000 (F) diluted in blocking buffer. The optimal incubation duration for the serum and secondary antibodies were 1.5&#x2009;h (E) and 2&#x2009;h (G), respectively. The optimal colorimetric reaction duration was determined after exposure to the substrate solution for 5&#x2009;min (H).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-11-1472979-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Cut-off values for scoring ELISA-tested chicken sera</title>
<p>One hundred and fifty-eight serum samples from broilers and 210 serum samples from layers were assessed via the <italic>M. synoviae</italic> ELISA antibody method based on rMS087. The ROC curve was generated on the basis of the values obtained from 368 serum samples, with the maximum value of the Youden index as the cut-off value. The maximum Youden index was 0.958, and the cut-off value was 0.5, indicating that when the OD<sub>450</sub> value of the serum to be tested was &#x2265;0.50, the sample was considered as positive for anti-<italic>M. synoviae</italic> antibodies; when the OD<sub>450</sub> value was &#x003C;0.50, the sample was considered as negative for anti-<italic>M. synoviae</italic> antibodies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<label>3.7</label>
<title>Reproducibility, cross reactivity and maximum serum dilution of the <italic>M. synoviae</italic> ELISA antibody test method</title>
<p>The reproducibility of the rMS087-based ELISA was assessed by determining the intra- and inter-assay variation. The intra-assay CVs of 4 negative serum samples and four positive serum samples ranged from 1.32 to 5.50%, and the inter-assay CVs of these samples ranged from 4.01 to 8.77%, suggesting that the ELISA results are reproducible, yielding low and acceptable variation.</p>
<p>The ELISA exhibited no cross-reactivity with sera containing antibodies against nine avian pathogens (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). These data indicated that the ELISA was specific to anti-<italic>M. synoviae</italic> antibodies induced by natural infection and that there was no cross-reaction with antisera against other avian pathogens.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Results of the detection of positive sera against avian pathogens via the rMS087-based ELISA antibody test method. MG: <italic>M. gallisepticum</italic>; SPG: <italic>Salmonella</italic> Pullorum-Gallinarum; AP-A: <italic>A. paragallinarum</italic> serovar A; AP-B: <italic>A. paragallinarum</italic> serovar B; AP-C: <italic>A. paragallinarum</italic> serovar C; NDV: Newcastle disease virus; AIV-H5: avian influenza virus subtype H5; AIV-H7: avian influenza virus subtype H7; AIV-H9: avian influenza virus subtype H9.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-11-1472979-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, with increasing dilution ratio of the serum, the OD<sub>450</sub> value decreased gradually. Five serum samples at a dilution of 1:1,000, three at a dilution of 1:2,000, and one at a dilution of 1:4,000 were considered positive, whereas no serum sample at a dilution of 1:8,000 or more were considered positive, suggesting that the serum can be diluted up to 1,000 times when using this method.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>The maximum dilution ratio of chicken sera for detection by the rMS087-based ELISA antibody test method.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-11-1472979-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<label>3.8</label>
<title>Comparisons with different detection methods</title>
<p>Serum samples collected from two slaughterhouses and five poultry farms were tested via a commercial ELISA kit and the rMS087-based ELISA method. The results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>. The results of the commercial ELISA kit and the rMS087-based ELISA were inconsistent in 28 samples. The total agreement between the commercial ELISA kit and the rMS087-based ELISA was 92.4%, with the sensitivity and specificity of the rMS087-based ELISA being 93.2% and 91.5% compared to those of the commercial ELISA kit, respectively. However, the rMS087-based ELISA method (52.4%, 193/368) could detect more M. synoviae-positive serum samples than commercial ELISA kit (51.9%, 191/368).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Detection of 368 chicken serum samples via a <italic>M. synoviae</italic> commercial ELISA antibody test kit and the rMS087-based ELISA antibody test method.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Commercial ELISA antibody test kit</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">ELISA antibody test method based on rMS087</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Total</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Positive</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Negative</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">178</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">191</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">162</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">177</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Total</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">193</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">175</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">368</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec23">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Accurate detection is a prerequisite for the effective prevention and control of <italic>M. synoviae</italic> infection. In modern poultry production, molecular detection and serological investigations are the most commonly used methods for infectious disease diagnosis. Owing to the sampling sites (upper respiratory tract) used in live poultry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">42</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">43</xref>), the sensitivity of molecular methods for detecting <italic>M. synoviae</italic> is limited. Serological methods, especially ELISA, make the detection of <italic>M. synoviae</italic> infection more convenient and inexpensive and have a higher detection rate than real-time PCR does (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">42</xref>), even if antibodies cannot be detected in the early stage of infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>).</p>
<p>The ELISA methods established previously have shown cross-reactivity with antisera against other avian <italic>Mycoplasmas</italic> due to the use of whole bacterial cells or membrane proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24 ref25 ref26">24&#x2013;26</xref>) or have shown reduced sensitivity because of variable amino acid sequences in selected proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>).</p>
<p>MS087, which contains 201 amino acids, was predicted to be 23&#x2009;kDa even if its signal peptide was not cleaved. However, the MW of MS087 in <italic>M. synoviae</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>) or recombinant bacteria (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) is 31&#x2009;kDa. The actual MW of MS087 is larger than the predicted MW. One possible reason might be due to inaccurate prediction of online bioinformatics. The second possible reason was that the protein undergone posttranslational modification, such as acetylation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>), lysine methylation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">45</xref>), etc.</p>
<p>Through BLAST analysis, we showed that MS087 was predicted to be an F1-like ATPase-associated subunit localized on the cell membrane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>), widely expressed in <italic>M. synoviae</italic> and had a highly conserved amino acid sequence. Our study showed that the protein was localized in both the cytoplasm and the membrane and was even secreted from the organism in our study. The data mentioned above indicate that the MS087 protein has the potential to serve as a good coating antigen for the development of an ELISA method to detect <italic>M. synoviae</italic> infection in chicken flocks.</p>
<p>We visited several layer farms. The breeders reported that laying hens that produced eggs with EAA did not develop arthritis in either layer pullet flocks or laying hen flocks. These findings suggest that different strains of <italic>M. synoviae</italic>, which cause arthritis in broilers and the production of eggs with EAA in laying hens, may have different tissue tropisms, although this speculation has not been proven. Therefore, in the process of establishing this method, we used positive control sera against <italic>M. synoviae</italic> derived from broilers and laying hens.</p>
<p>A cross-reactivity test revealed that the ELISA method based on rMS087 did not react with antisera against other major avian pathogens. Both the specificity (91.5%) and the sensitivity (93.2%) of the rMS087-based ELISA were greater than 90%. Whereas, the specificity and the sensitivity of the LP78-based ELISA were 94.1% and 85.7%, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>). Moreover, the ELISA method based on rMS087 (52.4%, 193/368) detected more positive sera against M. synoviae compared to the commercial kit (51.9%, 191/368), and the rLP78-based ELISA (61.8%, 105/170) detected fewer positive sera against M. synoviae than the commercial kit (70.0%, 119/170) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>). This difference may be because the LP78 protein is a membrane protein, while the MS087 protein not only exists on the membrane but can also be secreted out of cells, continuously stimulating the Th2 cell response and inducing the production of more antibodies against MS087.</p>
<p>There are four main types of <italic>Mycoplasmas</italic> that cause diseases in poultry, namely <italic>M. gallisepticum</italic>, <italic>M. synoviae</italic>, <italic>M. meleagridis</italic>, and <italic>M. iowae</italic>. <italic>M. meleagridis</italic> and <italic>M. iowae</italic> are the turkey pathogens. The purpose of this study was to establish an ELISA for the detection of anti-<italic>M. synoviae</italic> antibodies in chicken sera. Therefore, when determining whether there is cross-reactivity in the established detection method, only <italic>M. gallisepticum</italic> antibodies were used.</p>
<p>In subsequent work, we will use different <italic>M. synoviae</italic> strains to infect specific pathogen-free (SPF) white Leghorn-type chickens and <italic>M. synoviae</italic>-free layers to determine when the rMS087-based ELISA can detect anti-<italic>M. synoviae</italic> antibodies after infection. These findings can provide data to support the early diagnosis of <italic>M. synoviae</italic> infection. On this basis, the sensitivities of the rMS087-based ELISA and real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR will be compared.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec24">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In summary, this study established an ELISA method based on the secretory protein MS087 of <italic>M. synoviae</italic>, which has good specificity and sensitivity, and MS087could be used as a coating antigen for the detection of serum antibodies against <italic>M. synoviae</italic> in chicken flocks.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec25">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/search?searchTerm=CRR1309196" ext-link-type="uri">https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/search?searchTerm=CRR1309196</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec26">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal study was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Southwest University. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec27">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YZ: Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. YW: Data curation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. JH: Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. JL: Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. HD: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec28">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Lhasa Science and Technology Plan Project (LSKJ202412).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors would like to acknowledge all the study participants and individuals who contributed to this study.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec29">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec30">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec31">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1472979/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1472979/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.jpeg" id="SM1" mimetype="image/jpeg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn0001"><p><sup>1</sup><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.detaibio.com/sms2/protein_mw.html" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.detaibio.com/sms2/protein_mw.html</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="fn0002"><p><sup>2</sup><ext-link xlink:href="https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/" ext-link-type="uri">https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>GC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bletner</surname> <given-names>JK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munro</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olson</surname> <given-names>NO</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shelton</surname> <given-names>DC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Studies of infectious synovitis in chickens</article-title>. <source>Am J Vet Res</source>. (<year>1956</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>747</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">13362787</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olson</surname> <given-names>NO</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adler</surname> <given-names>HE</given-names></name> <name><surname>DaMassa</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Corstvet</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The effect of intranasal exposure to <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> and infectious bronchitis on development of lesions and agglutinins</article-title>. <source>Avian Dis</source>. (<year>1964</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>623</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1587950</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lockaby</surname> <given-names>SB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoerr</surname> <given-names>FJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lauerman</surname> <given-names>LH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kleven</surname> <given-names>SH</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Pathogenicity of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> in broiler chickens</article-title>. <source>Vet Pathol</source>. (<year>1998</year>) <volume>35</volume>:<fpage>178</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/030098589803500303</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9598581</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Epidemiological investigations and multilocus sequence typing of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> isolates from chicken farms in China</article-title>. <source>Poult Sci</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>102</volume>:<fpage>102006</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2022.102006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37099877</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moreira</surname> <given-names>FA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cardoso</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coelho</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Epidemiological survey on <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> infection in Portuguese broiler breeder flocks</article-title>. <source>Vet Ital</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>51</volume>:<fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12834/VetIt.116.329</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Catania</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bilato</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gobbo</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Granato</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Terregino</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iob</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Treatment of eggshell abnormalities and reduced egg production caused by <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>Avian Dis</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>54</volume>:<fpage>961</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1637/9121-110309-Case.1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20608549</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cisneros-Tamayo</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kempf</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coton</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Michel</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bougeard</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Boiss&#x00E9;son</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Investigation on eggshell apex abnormality (EAA) syndrome in France: isolation of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> is frequently associated with <italic>Mycoplasma pullorum</italic></article-title>. <source>BMC Vet Res</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>271</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12917-020-02487-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32758240</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feberwee</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Wit</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Landman</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Induction of eggshell apex abnormalities by <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic>: field and experimental studies</article-title>. <source>Avian Pathol</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>38</volume>:<fpage>77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>85</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/03079450802662772</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19156584</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomar</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khurana</surname> <given-names>SK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Insights on <italic>Mycoplasma gallisepticum</italic> and <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> infection in poultry: a systematic review</article-title>. <source>Anim Biotechnol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>33</volume>:<fpage>1711</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10495398.2021.1908316</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33840372</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>SK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Epidemiological investigation of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> in native chicken breeds in China</article-title>. <source>BMC Vet Res</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>115</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12917-017-1029-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28441945</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>MY</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>ZJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>GZ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Serological investigation of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> infection in China from 2010 to 2015</article-title>. <source>Poult Sci</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>96</volume>:<fpage>3109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pex134</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sui</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kan</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Epidemiological investigations and locally determined genotype diversity of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> in Central China from 2017 to 2019</article-title>. <source>Poult Sci</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>101</volume>:<fpage>101522</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2021.101522</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34818613</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Le Carrou</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reinhardt</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kempf</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gautier-Bouchardon</surname> <given-names>AV</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Persistence of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> in hens after two enrofloxacin treatments and detection of mutations in the <italic>parC</italic> gene</article-title>. <source>Vet Res</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>37</volume>:<fpage>145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/vetres:2005046</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16336931</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buim</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buzinhani</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamaguti</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>RC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mettifogo</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ueno</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> cell invasion: elucidation of the <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> pathogenesis in chicken</article-title>. <source>Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>34</volume>:<fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cimid.2009.11.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dusani&#x0107;</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bercic</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cizelj</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salmic</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Narat</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bencina</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> invades non-phagocytic chicken cells <italic>in vitro</italic></article-title>. <source>Vet Microbiol</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>138</volume>:<fpage>114</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.02.014</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19321273</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Interaction of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> with chicken synovial sheath cells contributes to macrophage recruitment and inflammation</article-title>. <source>Poult Sci</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>99</volume>:<fpage>5366</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feberwee</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morrow</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghorashi</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noormohammadi</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Landman</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effect of a live <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> vaccine on the production of eggshell apex abnormalities induced by a <italic>M. synoviae</italic> infection preceded by an infection with infectious bronchitis virus D1466</article-title>. <source>Avian Pathol</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>38</volume>:<fpage>333</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>40</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/03079450903183652</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Markham</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morrow</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whithear</surname> <given-names>KG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Efficacy of a temperature-sensitive <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> live vaccine</article-title>. <source>Avian Dis</source>. (<year>1998</year>) <volume>42</volume>:<fpage>671</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1592701</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9876834</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feberwee</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dijkman</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klinkenberg</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Landman</surname> <given-names>WJM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Quantification of the horizontal transmission of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> in non-vaccinated and MS-H-vaccinated layers</article-title>. <source>Avian Pathol</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>46</volume>:<fpage>346</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/03079457.2017.1282602</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28116916</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Evaluation of the protective efficacy of six major immunogenic proteins of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic></article-title>. <source>Front Vet Sci</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1334638</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2023.1334638</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38239753</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Opitz</surname> <given-names>HM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duplessis</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cyr</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Indirect micro-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of antibodies to <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> and <italic>M. gallisepticum</italic></article-title>. <source>Avian Dis</source>. (<year>1983</year>) <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>773</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1590321</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6639552</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thornton</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A comparison of three <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> rapid plate agglutination antigens in experimental <italic>M. synoviae</italic> infection in chickens</article-title>. <source>Avian Pathol</source>. (<year>1978</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/03079457808418264</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18770364</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vardaman</surname> <given-names>TH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yoder</surname> <given-names>HW</given-names> <suffix>Jr</suffix></name></person-group>. <article-title>Preparation of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> hemagglutinating antigen and its use in the hemagglutination-inhibition test</article-title>. <source>Avian Dis</source>. (<year>1969</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>654</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1588539</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5812093</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feberwee</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mekkes</surname> <given-names>DR</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Wit</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hartman</surname> <given-names>EG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pijpers</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Comparison of culture, PCR, and different serologic tests for detection of <italic>Mycoplasma gallisepticum</italic> and <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> infections</article-title>. <source>Avian Dis</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>49</volume>:<fpage>260</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1637/7274-090804R</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Higgins</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whithear</surname> <given-names>KG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Detection and differentiation of <italic>Mycoplasma gallisepticum</italic> and <italic>M. synoviae</italic> antibodies in chicken serum using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</article-title>. <source>Avian Dis</source>. (<year>1986</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>160</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1590628</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3729859</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Opitz</surname> <given-names>HM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cyr</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Triton X-100-solubilized <italic>Mycoplasma gallisepticum</italic> and <italic>M. synoviae</italic> ELISA antigens</article-title>. <source>Avian Dis</source>. (<year>1986</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>213</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1590636</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3729864</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Noormohammadi</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Browning</surname> <given-names>GF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whithear</surname> <given-names>KG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Improved detection of antibodies to <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> vaccine MS-H using an autologous recombinant MSPB enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</article-title>. <source>Avian Pathol</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>611</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/0307945021000024553</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12593746</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><label>28.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Noormohammadi</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Markham</surname> <given-names>PF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Markham</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whithear</surname> <given-names>KG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Browning</surname> <given-names>GF</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> surface protein MSPB as a recombinant antigen in an indirect ELISA</article-title>. <source>Microbiology (Reading)</source>. (<year>1999</year>) <volume>145</volume>:<fpage>2087</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/13500872-145-8-2087</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><label>29.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Noormohammadi</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Markham</surname> <given-names>PF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whithear</surname> <given-names>KG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>ID</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gurevich</surname> <given-names>VA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ley</surname> <given-names>DH</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> has two distinct phase-variable major membrane antigens, one of which is a putative hemagglutinin</article-title>. <source>Infect Immun</source>. (<year>1997</year>) <volume>65</volume>:<fpage>2542</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/iai.65.7.2542-2547.1997</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><label>30.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Noormohammadi</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Markham</surname> <given-names>PF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kanci</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whithear</surname> <given-names>KG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Browning</surname> <given-names>GF</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A novel mechanism for control of antigenic variation in the haemagglutinin gene family of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic></article-title>. <source>Mol Microbiol</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>35</volume>:<fpage>911</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01766.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10692167</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><label>31.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> LP78 is a fibronectin/plasminogen binding protein, putative adhesion, and potential diagnostic antigen</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>1335658</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1335658</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><label>32.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>B&#x00E9;ven</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Charenton</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dautant</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bouyssou</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Labroussaa</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sk&#x00F6;llermo</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Specific evolution of F1-like ATPases in <italic>mycoplasmas</italic></article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>e38793</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0038793</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22685606</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><label>33.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Teufel</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Almagro Armenteros</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johansen</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x00ED;slason</surname> <given-names>MH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pihl</surname> <given-names>SI</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsirigos</surname> <given-names>KD</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models</article-title>. <source>Nat Biotechnol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>1023</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-021-01156-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34980915</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><label>34.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krogh</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larsson</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>von Heijne</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sonnhammer</surname> <given-names>EL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes</article-title>. <source>J Mol Biol</source>. (<year>2001</year>) <volume>305</volume>:<fpage>567</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11152613</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><label>35.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>CS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hwang</surname> <given-names>JK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Predicting subcellular localization of proteins for gram-negative bacteria by support vector machines based on n-peptide compositions</article-title>. <source>Protein Sci</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>1402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1110/ps.03479604</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15096640</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><label>36.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>HB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chou</surname> <given-names>KC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Gpos-mPLoc: a top-down approach to improve the quality of predicting subcellular localization of gram-positive bacterial proteins</article-title>. <source>Protein Pept Lett</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>1478</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>84</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2174/092986609789839322</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20001911</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><label>37.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Doytchinova</surname> <given-names>IA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flower</surname> <given-names>DR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>VaxiJen: a server for prediction of protective antigens, tumour antigens and subunit vaccines</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinformatics</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>4</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-8-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17207271</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><label>38.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase is an immunogenic fibronectin/plasminogen binding protein and a putative adhesin</article-title>. <source>Vet Microbiol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>265</volume>:<fpage>109328</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2021.109328</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35032790</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><label>39.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ning</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Development of an indirect ELISA for detection of anti-<italic>Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae</italic> IgG in naturally infected pathogen-induced convalescent sera</article-title>. <source>BMC Vet Res</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>123</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12917-021-02828-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33726780</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><label>40.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garg</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Campolonghi</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A step-by-step guide to selecting an optimal cut-off value based on the receiver operating characteristic and Youden index in methods designed to diagnose Lyme disease</article-title>. <source>Methods Mol Biol</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>2742</volume>:<fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-0716-3561-2_5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38165615</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><label>41.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lohr</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Greiner</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The selection of ELISA cut-off points for testing antibody to Newcastle disease by two-graph receiver operating characteristic (TG-ROC) analysis</article-title>. <source>J Immunol Methods</source>. (<year>1997</year>) <volume>208</volume>:<fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0022-1759(97)00128-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9433461</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><label>42.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cort&#x00E9;s</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sevilla-Navarro</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garc&#x00ED;a</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tud&#x00F3;n</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mar&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Catal&#x00E1;-Gregori</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Seroprevalence and prevalence of <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> in laying hens and broiler breeders in Spain</article-title>. <source>Poult Sci</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>100</volume>:<fpage>100911</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.076</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33518326</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><label>43.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moronato</surname> <given-names>ML</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cecchinato</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Facchetti</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mainenti</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gobbo</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Catania</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Application of different laboratory techniques to monitor the behaviour of a <italic>Mycoplasma synoviae</italic> vaccine (MS-H) in broiler breeders</article-title>. <source>BMC Vet Res</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>357</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12917-018-1669-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30458824</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><label>44.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Bacterial protein acetylation and its role in cellular physiology and metabolic regulation</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol Adv</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>53</volume>:<fpage>107842</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107842</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34624455</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><label>45.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Chemical and biochemical perspectives of protein lysine methylation</article-title>. <source>Chem Rev</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>118</volume>:<fpage>6656</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>705</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00008</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29927582</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>