<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Vet. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Veterinary Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Vet. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2297-1769</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2023.1234206</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Veterinary Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Characteristics, surgical treatment, and outcomes of injuries involving the tarsus in greyhounds</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Biggo</surname>
<given-names>Morgan R.</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2341695/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname>
<given-names>Stephen C.</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2330514/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wanstrath</surname>
<given-names>Audrey W.</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2341696/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tinga</surname>
<given-names>Selena</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dyce</surname>
<given-names>Jonathan</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Carson</surname>
<given-names>Brittney A.</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2357683/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schaul</surname>
<given-names>Kelsey</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Follette</surname>
<given-names>Christelle M.</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2341706/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Kieves</surname>
<given-names>Nina R.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/942892/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University</institution>, <addr-line>Columbus, OH</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn0001" fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: David Levine, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, United States</p></fn>
<fn id="fn0002" fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Denis J. Marcellin-Little, University of California, Davis, United States; Brian Trumpatori, ACOSM, United States; William Mike Karlin, Tufts University, United States</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Nina R. Kieves, <email>kieves.1@osu.edu</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>08</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>1234206</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>03</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>26</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Biggo, Jones, Wanstrath, Tinga, Dyce, Carson, Schaul, Follette and Kieves.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Biggo, Jones, Wanstrath, Tinga, Dyce, Carson, Schaul, Follette and Kieves</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="sec1">
<title>Objective</title>
<p>The first objective of this study was to describe the type of tarsal injuries sustained, surgery performed, and postoperative complications in greyhounds presenting to a single veterinary hospital. An additional objective of the study was to determine the surgical site infection (SSI) and explantation rate, and if any variables were associated with an increased risk of SSI and/or explantation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2">
<title>Animals</title>
<p>116 greyhounds receiving surgical intervention for a tarsal injury.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Proceures</title>
<p>Medical records from a single veterinary referral hospital were reviewed retrospectively. Data retrieved included signalment, details regarding the injury, surgical intervention, concurrent castration, surgical/anesthesia times, postoperative management, time to healing, and postoperative complications. In cases that underwent explantation, cause, time from initial surgery, and risk factors were evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Results</title>
<p>The most frequently diagnosed tarsal injuries were fracture of the central tarsal bone (CTB; 57.8%), calcaneal fracture (56.9%) and proximal intertarsal subluxation (34.5%). The most common injury combination was a CTB fracture with a calcaneal fracture (31.9%). In total 115 (99.1%) survived to discharge. Of these, 46 (40.0%) were diagnosed with an SSI and 59 (51.3%) underwent explantation. The most common indication for explantation was SSI. Concurrent medial and lateral surgical approaches was found to be associated with an increased likelihood of SSI and explantation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Clinical relevance</title>
<p>Practitioners performing surgical intervention for tarsal injuries in greyhounds should be aware of the high SSI rate and likelihood that explantation will be required. This risk is elevated for injuries requiring a bilateral surgical approach.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>greyhound</kwd>
<kwd>tarsus</kwd>
<kwd>injury</kwd>
<kwd>surgical site infection</kwd>
<kwd>explantation</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="1"/>
<table-count count="10"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="52"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="8305"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Veterinary Surgery</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec6">
<label>1.</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Orthopedic injuries are a common occurrence in the racing greyhound and typically occur by a failure of the musculoskeletal structures to withstand the forces developed during a race (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>). In the United States, greyhounds race exclusively in an anticlockwise direction on an oval track, resulting in asymmetric adaptive remodeling of both the skeleton and soft tissues, particularly the left front and right hindlimb (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>), as the left forelimb acts as a pivot and the right hind limb provides propulsive effort when rounding bends (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>). In other countries, they may race clockwise, or both directions. An injury rate of 3.4% was previously reported in racing greyhounds in the United States (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>). Tarsal injuries accounted for 6% of total racing injuries with approximately 60% of all tarsal injuries being fractures. Central tarsal bone (CTB) fractures are the most commonly reported tarsal fracture, and numerous other tarsal bone fractures have been reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>). Complications reported with surgical repair of tarsal fractures include infection, dehiscence, implant failure, implant loosening, delayed union, reduced range of motion, non-union, infective arthritis, and residual lameness secondary to implant irritation of soft tissue (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>). Many of these complications result in the necessity for additional surgical intervention with added patient morbidity and financial burden. Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a frustrating and expensive complication in veterinary surgery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>). To the authors&#x2019; knowledge, there is no literature investigating the SSI and explantation rate in greyhounds undergoing tarsal surgery. As these injuries often occur in racing greyhounds, financial burden plays a role in their clinical management. Establishing what variables, if any, are associated with an increase in SSI and explantation rate is a first step in minimizing the cost of care and patient morbidity.</p>
<p>There has been no recent literature reviewing common tarsal fracture presentations and postoperative complications in greyhounds. The first objective of this retrospective study was to describe the type of tarsal injuries sustained, surgical intervention performed, and postoperative complications in the unique population of greyhounds presenting to a single referral veterinary medical center. An additional objective of the study, was to determine if any epidemiologic or intraoperative factors were associated with an increased risk of SSI and/or explantation. Based on our experience, we hypothesized that the SSI rate for greyhounds undergoing tarsal surgery would be higher than both the previously reported SSI rate for orthopedic surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec7">
<label>2.</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.1.</label>
<title>Study design</title>
<p>Medical records from September 2008 to November 2019 from (location masked for blind review) were reviewed retrospectively for greyhounds undergoing surgical repair of a tarsal injury. Data was collected on signalment, date of injury, nature of injury (racing vs. other), time to surgery from initial injury, lateralization of injury, injury description (bones fractured, open vs. closed fracture, joint luxation), surgical procedure(s) performed, use of bone graft, use of tourniquet, concurrent castration or ovariohysterectomy, surgical time, anesthesia time, primary surgeon (surgical resident vs. board-certified surgeon), postoperative medications, use of bandage/external coaptation, time to discontinuation of bandage/external coaptation use, development of bandage morbidity, time to radiographic healing, evidence of infection, and cause of and time to explantation from initial surgery when performed. Postoperative infection was diagnosed based on positive culture result when available or physical exam (soft tissue edema, incisional drainage, draining tract(s), pain, heat) and radiographic findings (irregular periosteal response, peri-implant radiolucency, implant loosening).</p>
<p>Inclusion criteria included diagnosis of a tarsal injury at presentation for which surgical intervention was performed. Tarsal injuries were diagnosed via history, clinical signs, physical examination, and radiographic findings. All surgical procedures were performed at (location masked for blind review) with each dog having immediate postoperative radiographs available for review. Exclusion criteria included tarsal injuries managed conservatively or injuries not isolated to the tarsus or tibiotarsal joint.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.2.</label>
<title>Tarsal injury description</title>
<p>Tarsal injury description was acquired via physical examination and radiographic findings. CTB fractures were graded according to a previously described classification system (<xref rid="tab1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>). Fracture of the plantar process of the CTB was recorded separately. Calcaneal fractures were described as simple midbody, comminuted, associated with plantar tarsal ligament avulsion, midbody fracture with fissure extending to the distal articular surface, or base/articular injuries.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Central tarsal bone fracture classification system as described by Dee et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Grade</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Central tarsal bone fracture configuration</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">I</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Dorsal slab fracture without displacement</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">II</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Dorsal slab fracture with displacement</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">III</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Dorsal or medial slab fracture with displacement</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">IV</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Both dorsal and medial slab fractures</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">V</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Severely comminuted and displaced fractures</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.3.</label>
<title>Surgical procedure</title>
<p>The choice of surgical intervention was made on the basis of type of tarsal injury, previously described repair techniques (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>) and surgeon preference. For each patient undergoing surgical intervention, the following was documented: procedure type, whether a medial and/or lateral approach was performed, if an arthrodesis was performed and if a tourniquet was used. If a CTB fracture was repaired, the screw type(s) used was recorded; additionally, it was noted if the screw was placed in lag or positional technique. If a lateral plate was used to address a calcaneal fracture or joint subluxation/luxation, the type and size of plate used, whether the 4th tarsal bone was engaged through the plate, number of locking screws in the proximal and distal segments, number of cortical screws in the proximal and distal segments, percentage of metatarsal length spanned, and total number of metatarsal cortices captured were recorded. If a bone graft was performed, the timing of the graft (at initial procedure or delayed), as well as location of the graft donor site, were recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>2.4.</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>All analyses were performed using R version 4.2.2 [(2022-10-31 ucrt)&#x2014;&#x201C;Innocent and Trusting&#x201D; Copyright (C) 2022 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing]. Univariate logistic regressions were used to look at the effect of tarsal injury type, surgical procedures, surgical approach, bone plate type, concurrent spay or neuter, anesthetic time, and surgical time on the likelihood of developing a surgical site infection and the likelihood of requiring an explantation separately (not controlling for signalment or other details). Though these 14 univariate analyses were used for hypothesis generation and screeining of variables for a multivariate model, if readers wish to assign significance based on the reported <italic>p</italic>-values, the Bonferroni-corrected <italic>p</italic>-value for significance with a type I error rate of 0.05 would be &#x003C;0.004. Multivariate logistic regression was used to look at the combined effects of surgical time, concurrent spay or neuter, and surgical approach. The probabilities of requiring an explantation based on anesthetic and surgical time were plotted using the smoothed conditional density plot (&#x201C;cdplot&#x201D; function) of the data (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Probabilities of explantation based on anesthetic and surgery times.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-10-1234206-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec12">
<label>3.</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>3.1.</label>
<title>Case data</title>
<p>A total of 116 greyhounds undergoing tarsal surgery were included in this study. The median age at the time of surgery was 37&#x2009;months (range 10&#x2013;30&#x2009;months). Sixty-nine were male (52 intact, 17 castrated) and 47 were female (36 intact, 11 spayed). When evaluating the cause of tarsal injury, 105 (90.2%) were racing related injuries. The time from initial injury to surgery was available in 95 dogs, with a median of 3&#x2009;days to surgery (range 0&#x2013;1,461&#x2009;days). Of 116 greyhounds undergoing tarsal surgery, 115 survived to discharge. One case was euthanized 4&#x2009;days postoperatively due to incision dehiscence for which the owner declined therapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>3.2.</label>
<title>Tarsal injury description</title>
<p>Of the 116 greyhounds included in this study, 98 presented for a right tarsal injury (84.5%) and 18 presented with a left tarsal injury (15.5%). A total of 109 injuries were reported to be closed (94.0%) and 7 injuries were reported to be open (6.0%). Open fractures were Gustilo&#x2013;Anderson grade I and involved the calcaneus. The most common tarsal injuries reported were CTB fractures (67/116; 57.8%), calcaneal fractures (66/116; 56.9%), and proximal intertarsal subluxation (40/116; 34.5%). Additional injuries diagnosed included fourth tarsal bone fractures (19/116; 16.4%), metatarsal bone five fractures (5/116; 4.3%), talar fractures (5/116; 4.3%), distal tibial articular fractures (2/116; 1.7%), and third tarsal bone fractures (1/116; 0.9%). Injury breakdown is further described in <xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Tarsal injuries diagnosed.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Injury</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number (%) of dogs</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Central tarsal bone fracture</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">67 (57.8%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Calcaneal fracture</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">66 (56.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Talar fracture</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">5 (4.3%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Third tarsal bone fracture</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fourth tarsal bone fracture</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">19 (16.4%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fifth metatarsal fracture</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">5 (4.3%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Joint subluxation/luxation</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">53 (45.7%)<xref rid="tfn1" ref-type="table-fn"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Distal tibial articular fracture</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">2 (1.7%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn1"><label>a</label><p>One of the fifty-three cases diagnosed with joint subluxation/luxation had multiple joints affected.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>When evaluating injury combinations/configurations the most common injury presentation was CTB fracture with concurrent calcaneal fracture which was seen in 37/116 dogs (31.9%). Thirty-three dogs (33/116; 28.5%) were diagnosed with a single injury. Further evaluation of single injuries, two component injuries, three component injuries, and injuries involving greater than three components is provided in <xref rid="tab3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Description of tarsal injury occurrences and combinations of injuries.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Injury</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number (%) of dogs</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">CTB fracture only</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">2 (1.7%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Calcaneal fracture only</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">9 (7.8%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T4 fracture only</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Joint subluxation/luxation only</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">21 (18.1%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="2">Injury with two components</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>CTB and T4 fracture</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">7 (6.0%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>CTB and calcaneal fracture</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">37 (31.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>Calcaneus and talar fracture</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>Calcaneus and T4 fracture</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>CTB fracture and joint subluxation/luxation</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">7 (6.0%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>Calcaneal fracture with joint subluxation/luxation</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">7 (6.0%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>T3 fracture with joint subluxation/luxation</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>T4 fracture and joint subluxation/luxation</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">2 (1.7%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>MT5 fracture and joint subluxation/luxation</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>Distal tibial articular fracture and joint subluxation/luxation</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">2 (1.7%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="2">Injury with three components</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>CTB, T4, and MT5 fracture</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">3 (2.6%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>CTB, calcaneus, and talar fracture</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>CTB and T4 fracture with joint subluxation/luxation</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>CTB and talar fracture with joint subluxation/luxation</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">2 (1.7%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>CTB and calcaneal fracture with joint subluxation/luxation</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">5 (4.3%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>Calcaneus and T4 fracture with joint subluxation/luxation</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">2 (1.7%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>Calcaneus and MT5 fracture and joint subluxation/luxation</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="2">Injury with more than three components</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>CTB, calcaneus, T4 and talar fracture</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>CTB, Calcaneus, and T4 fracture with joint subluxation/luxation</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>CTB, central tarsal bone; T3, third tarsal bone; T4, fourth tarsal bone; MT5, fifth metatarsal bone.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The 67 CTB fractures were further graded by the previously described classification system of Dee et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>) (<xref rid="tab4" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref>). The most common CTB fracture grade recorded was a type IV CTB fracture (47/67; 70.2%). The remaining CTB fractures were classified as follows: type II in 3/67 cases (4.5%), type III in 2/67 cases (3.0%), type V in 12/67 cases (12/67; 17.9%), and plantar process fracture in 3/67 cases (4.5%).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p>Central tarsal bone fracture classifications.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Central tarsal bone fracture grade</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number (%) of dogs with central tarsal bone fractures (<italic>N</italic> =&#x2009;67)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">I</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">0 (0%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">II</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">3 (4.5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">III</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">2 (3.0%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">IV</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">47 (70.2%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">V</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">12 (17.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Plantar process fracture</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">3 (4.5%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The 66 calcaneal fractures were further described by their fracture configuration (<xref rid="tab5" ref-type="table">Table 5</xref>). The most common configuration was a mid-body fracture with a fissure extending to the distal articular surface, seen in 36/66 cases (54.5%). The remaining calcaneal fractures were classified as follows: simple mid-body fracture in 3/66 cases (4.6%), comminuted fracture in 14/66 cases (21.2%), plantar tarsal ligament avulsion fracture in 10/66 cases (10/66; 15.2%), and base/articular injury in 3/66 cases (4.6%).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption><p>Calcaneal fracture configuration.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Calcaneal fracture configuration</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number (%) of dogs with calcaneal fractures (<italic>N</italic> =&#x2009;66)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Simple mid-body</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">3 (4.6%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Comminuted</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">14 (21.2%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Plantar tarsal ligament avulsion</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">10 (15.2%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Mid-body with fissure extending to distal articular surface</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">36 (54.5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Base/articular injury</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">3 (4.6%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Joint luxation/subluxation was diagnosed in 53 dogs (53/116; 45.7%). The level of joint luxation/subluxation can be seen in <xref rid="tab6" ref-type="table">Table 6</xref>. The most commonly affected joint was the proximal intertarsal subluxation in 40/53 dogs (75.5%). The remaining joint instabilities were diagnosed as follows: tarsometatarsal subluxation in 6/53 cases (11.3%), talocrural luxation in 5/53 cases (9.4%), distal intertarsal subluxation in 1/53 cases (1.9%), and combined proximal intertarsal subluxation and talocalcaneal luxation in 1/53 cases (1.9%).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption><p>Level of joint luxation/subluxation.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Joint level and severity</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number (%) of dogs with joint luxation/subluxation (<italic>N</italic> =&#x2009;53)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Proximal intertarsal subluxation</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">40 (75.5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Distal intertarsal subluxation</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (1.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Proximal intertarsal subluxation and talocalcaneal luxation</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (1.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Tarsometatarsal subluxation</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">6 (11.3%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Talocrural luxation</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">5 (9.4%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.3.</label>
<title>Surgical procedure</title>
<p>Surgery was performed by a board-certified surgeon in 80 cases, a small animal surgery resident in 29 cases, and the surgeon was unspecified in 7 cases. A full list of all surgical procedures can be found in <xref rid="tab7" ref-type="table">Table 7</xref>. The most commonly performed initial surgical intervention was a partial tarsal arthrodesis (50/116; 43.1%). Forty-four dogs underwent partial tarsal arthrodesis without additional procedures (44/116; 37.9%) and an additional 6/116 (5.2%) dogs underwent partial tarsal arthrodesis in combination with another surgical procedure. Joint level of arthrodesis was dependent on the injury configuration, but the joint most commonly undergoing arthrodesis was the calcaneoquartal joint accounting for 25/50 cases (50.0%). Additional joints undergoing arthrodesis included the proximal intertarsal joint (17/50; 34.0%) and tarsometatarsal joint (6/50; 12.0%). The joint level of arthrodesis was not recorded in 2 cases (<xref rid="tab8" ref-type="table">Table 8</xref>). While under anesthesia for the initial surgical intervention of the tarsal injury, a total of 21/116 cases (18.1%) underwent concurrent elective sterilization. Following surgery, post-operative antibiotics were prescribed in 111 cases (111/116; 95.7%). The most commonly prescribed antibiotic was cephalexin (103 cases), followed by metronidazole (6 cases) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (5 cases). Ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, and enrofloxacin were used in one case each. Additionally, one patient received an unspecified oral antibiotic post-operatively.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab7">
<label>Table 7</label>
<caption><p>Initial surgical procedures performed.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Initial surgical procedure performed</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number (%) of dogs</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Partial tarsal arthrodesis</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">44 (37.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Partial tarsal arthrodesis with CTB screw fixation</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">4 (3.5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Partial tarsal arthrodesis with CTB screw fixation and lag screw fixation a calcaneal fracture</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Partial tarsal arthrodesis, fibular osteotomy with screw fixation, CTB screw fixation, and screw fixation for talar fracture</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lateral bridging plate</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">14 (12.1%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lateral bridging plate with CTB screw fixation</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">25 (21.6%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lateral bridging plate with IM pin</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lateral bridging plate with IM pin and CTB screw fixation</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">8 (6.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lateral bridging plate with calcaneal lag screw</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">2 (1.7%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lateral bridging plate with calcaneal lag screw, and CTB screw fixation</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">CTB screw fixation</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">8 (6.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Transarticular external skeletal fixator</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Calcaneal pin and tension band</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Talo-calcaneal screw</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lateral malleolar pin and tension band</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Medial malleolar pin and tension band</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lateral and medial pin and tension band with lag screw fixation of the caudal distal articular tibial fracture fragment</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1 (0.9%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab8">
<label>Table 8</label>
<caption><p>Level of joint arthrodesis.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Joint level</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number (%) of dogs (<italic>N</italic> =&#x2009;50)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Calcaneoquartal joint</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">25 (50.0%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Proximal intertarsal joint</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">17 (34.0%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Tarsometatarsal joint</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">6 (12.0%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Unknown</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">2 (4.0%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.4.</label>
<title>Postoperative infection</title>
<p>The one case that was euthanized 4&#x2009;days postoperatively was excluded from assessment of post operative infection. Culture and sensitivity were performed in 55/115 cases (47.8%). Culture was performed due to suspicion of infection based on physical examination, radiographic examination, or was performed at the time of explantation as a precautionary measure. Of those 55 cases, 21 cases had more than one culture performed over the course of treatment. Forty six of 55 (83.6%) cases had at least one positive culture, 7/55 (12.7%) had no growth on any of the cultures performed, and 2/55 (3.6%) had unknown results. Two cases were suspected to have active infection at the time of implant removal based on irregular periosteal new bone formation, soft tissue swelling, peri-implant lucency, and response to empirical antibiotic therapy, but no culture and sensitivity was performed. Based on positive culture, the overall SSI rate was 40.0% (46/115). Of these cases, 6 presented with an open fracture and were therefore not considered a clean procedure. Excluding these 6 cases, the overall SSI rate for clean procedures in this study was 36.7% (40/109).</p>
<p>When evaluating all cases that had positive culture results reported in the medical record (including cases with multiple cultures over time), the most commonly isolated organism was <italic>Staphylococcus pseudintermedius</italic>, which was identified in 35 cases. The remaining isolates are available for review in <xref rid="tab9" ref-type="table">Table 9</xref>. For cases with available sensitivity results 34.3% (12/35) of <italic>S. pseudintermedius</italic> cases showed evidence of methicillin resistance (MRSP).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab9">
<label>Table 9</label>
<caption><p>Bacterial culture isolates.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Isolate</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number of times isolated</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Staphylococcus pseudointermedius</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Actinomyces</italic> sp.</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Enterobacter cloacae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Enterococcus faecium</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Escherichia coli</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Pasteurella multocida</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Streptococcus</italic> sp.</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Bacillus</italic> sp.</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Enterococcus hirae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Peptpstreptococcus</italic> sp.</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Staphylococcus epidermis</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Staphylococcus</italic> sp. (unidentified)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Acinebacter</italic> sp.</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Arcanobacterium</italic> spp.</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Bacteriodies</italic> sp.</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Enterococcus faecalis</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Enterococcus</italic> sp.</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Porphyromonas</italic> sp.</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Proteus mirabilis</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Factors associated independently with an increased likelihood of surgical site infection included performing both a medial and lateral approach compared to a single approach {<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.007; odds ratio&#x2009;=&#x2009;2.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] (1.35, 6.59)}, concurrent spay or neuter [<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.030; odds ratio&#x2009;=&#x2009;2.95, 95% CI (1.13, 8.16)], the use of a locking plate [<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.013; odds ratio&#x2009;=&#x2009;3.45, 95% CI (1.35, 9.72)], and increased anesthetic/surgical time [<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.023; for each additional 20&#x2009;min odds ratio&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.17, 95% CI (1.03, 1.36)]. None of these were significant at the Bonferroni-corrected <italic>p</italic>-value cutoff of 0.004. All other variables were not associated with increased odds of SSI. In dogs that received a bone plate as part of surgical repair, nonlocking plates had lower odds of developing a surgical site infection (reported above) compared to locking plates. Compared to the entire cohort (patients receiving any type of fixation), patients receiving a locking plate were at a significantly higher risk of developing a surgical site infection [<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.0002; odds ratio&#x2009;=&#x2009;5.76, 95% CI (2.37, 15.71)]. When controlling in a multivariate model for dogs that had both medial and lateral approaches and a concurrent spay/neuter together and accounting for surgical time, the only significant effect on developing a surgical site infection was having a medial and lateral approach [<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0. 038; odds ratio&#x2009;=&#x2009;2.43, 95% CI (1.05, 5.70)]. Seven of 116 (6.0%) injuries were classified as open at the time of presentation. Of these 7 cases, one was the aforementioned case that was euthanized 4&#x2009;days postoperatively. The remaining 6 were all diagnosed with an SSI via positive culture postoperatively. All these cases presented with a calcaneal fracture as a component of their tarsal injury.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>3.5.</label>
<title>Explantation</title>
<p>Of the cases that survived to discharge, explantation was performed in 59/115 (51.3%) dogs. The most common recorded cause for explanation was concern for infection (44/59; 74.6%). The odds of explantation for animals with an SSI was 49.69 times the odds of explantation for those without a surgical site infection (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.000). A total of 10/59 cases (16.9%) were explanted for a reason other than infection, including implant migration, implant exposure, suspected irritation of soft tissue by implants, planned external fixator removal, and implant failure. For the remaining 6/59 cases (10.1%), the underlying reason for explantation could not be discerned from the available medical record. Median time to explantation was 159&#x2009;days following surgery (range 40&#x2013;1,728&#x2009;days).</p>
<p>Patients receiving an arthrodesis of the proximal intertarsal joint were less likely to have an explantation compared to patients that did not undergo arthrodesis [<italic>p</italic>-value&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.011; odds ratio&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.21, 95% CI (0.05, 0.65)] on univariant analysis.</p>
<p>Patients with calcaneal fractures (all types) had higher odds of requiring an explantation compared to patients with no calcaneal fracture [<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.023; odds ratio&#x2009;=&#x2009;2.40, 95% CI (1.14, 5.17)]. Specifically, patients diagnosed with mid-body calcaneal fractures with fissures extending to the distal articular surface had a higher risk of requiring an explantation compared to those cases without a calcaneal fracture [<italic>p</italic>-value&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.008; odds ratio&#x2009;=&#x2009;3.41, 95% CI (1.40, 8.70)]. This would not be considered significant when using the conservative Bonferroni-corrected <italic>p</italic>-value cutoff of &#x003C;0.004.</p>
<p>Surgical procedure factors independently associated with an increased risk of requiring explantation in univariate analysis included concurrent medial and lateral surgical approaches, concurrent spay or neuter, and the use of locking plates. The odds of explantation for dogs receiving both a medial and lateral surgical approach to the tarsus were 3.24 times the odds as those receiving only a medial or lateral approach [<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.004, 95% CI (1.49, 7.33)]. Concurrent spay or neuter was associated with an increased odds of requiring an explantation [<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.006; odds ratio&#x2009;=&#x2009;5.04, 95% CI (1.71, 18.54)]. In patients having received a bone plate as part of surgical repair, nonlocking plates had lower odds of requiring an explantation [<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.0030, 95% CI (0.12, 0.72)] compared to locking plates. Compared to the entire cohort, patients receiving a locking plate were at a higher risk of requiring an explantation [<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.009; odds ratio&#x2009;=&#x2009;3.38, 95% CI (1.38, 8.69)]. In addition, there was a greater odds of explantation associated with an increasing number of locking screws both proximally [<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.064; odds ratio&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.38, 95% CI (0.99, 1.96)] and distally [<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.024; odds ratio&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.53, 95% CI (1.08, 2.27)]. As with SSIs, none of these factors examined in univariate statistical screening would be considered significantly associated with the risk of explantation using the conservative Bonferroni-corrected <italic>p</italic>-value cutoff of &#x003C;0.004.</p>
<p>There was a relatively regular progression of increasing risk of explantation with increasing surgical and anesthetic time (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>). For each additional 20&#x2009;min of surgery time, the odds ratio of explantation was 1.17 [<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.023, 95% CI (1.03, 1.36)]. There was a spike in probability of explantation with anesthetic times less than 180&#x2009;min and a dip in probability of explantation with surgical times greater than 240&#x2009;min. When controlling for dogs that had both medial and lateral approaches and a concurrent spay/neuter together, the only significant effect on explanation was having both a medial and lateral approach [<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.049; odds ratio&#x2009;=&#x2009;2.48, 95% CI (1.01, 6.25)].</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>3.6.</label>
<title>Additional complications</title>
<p>A total of 38 additional complications were noted in 32/116 (27.6%) of cases. These complications ranged in severity with varying interventions required. A full list of additional complications and the number of patients with these complications is reported in <xref rid="tab10" ref-type="table">Table 10</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab10">
<label>Table 10</label>
<caption><p>Additional complications.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Additional complication</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number of dogs</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Implant exposure</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Re-luxation of joint or residual instability requiring revision surgery</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Implant failure</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Suboptimal fracture reduction requiring surgical revision</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Suboptimal fracture or joint reduction with minimal clinical impact and no surgical intervention required</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Refracture with amputation elected</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Stripping of the screw during CTB repair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Inappropriate directing of the screw used for CTB fracture reduction</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Collapse of the fourth tarsal bone during healing leading to tarsal valgus</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Collateral instability due to implant migration</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Refracture requiring revision surgery</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Progressive osteomyelitis with amputation elected</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Euthanasia 4&#x2009;days postoperatively due to incisional dehiscence and owner reluctance to move forward with additional therapy</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussions" id="sec19">
<label>4.</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Tarsal injuries in greyhounds present significant management challenges due to their thin skin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>) and the minimal soft tissue coverage associated with the distal limb (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>). Previous reports have examined the frequency of tarsal injuries in the racing greyhound with the majority involving fractures of the CTB (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>). Of the 116 greyhounds evaluated in this study, CTB fractures were the most frequent injury component with calcaneal fractures and proximal intertarsal subluxation also reported with high frequency (57.8%, 56.9%, and 34.5% respectively). The most common surgical repair in this group of patients was a partial tarsal arthrodesis, most frequently performed at the level of the calcaneoquartal joint. A variety of postoperative complications were recorded in this cohort of patients. Of significant clinical importance, the overall SSI rate was noted to be higher than previously reported for orthopedic procedures allowing us to accept our hypothesis.</p>
<p>Of the 115 greyhounds that survived to discharge, 40.0% were diagnosed with an SSI via positive bacterial culture. Of these, 6 cases presented with an open fracture and were therefore not considered a clean procedure. Excluding these 6 cases, the overall SSI rate for clean procedures in this study was 36.7% (40/109). The SSI rate for clean orthopedic surgeries has been previously reported to range from 3.3% to 7.1% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>). Greyhounds in this study undergoing a clean orthopedic procedure were almost 5 times more likely to develop a surgical site infection compared to previously reported literature. Even when compared to the tibial plateau leveling osteotomy, an orthopedic procedure that has a surgical site infection rate as high as 15.8% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>), the reported infection rate in this study is more than double what has been historically reported. Armstrong et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>) reported a postoperative SSI rate of 10.7% in nonracing dogs with CTB injuries. We postulate that the reason for the higher SSI rate in our study is primarily secondary to patient population. Greyhounds have thinner skin which is more prone to damage compared to other breeds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>) increasing the risk of incision dehiscence, bandage associated morbidity, implant exposure, and SSI. Additionally, greyhounds have a paucity of subcutaneous tissue compared to other dog breeds. Previous literature has shown that subcutaneous tissue plays an important role in cutaneous wound healing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>). In a study by Bohling et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>) the removal of the subcutaneous tissue caused a significant reduction in perfusion of open wounds. This demonstrated the importance of the subcutis in 2nd intention healing which is elected on occasion in greyhounds when excessive tension would be noted with incisional closure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>). Interestingly, this is in direct opposition to several studies in human literature that have found that increased soft tissue thickness/coverage (&#x003E;5&#x2009;cm) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>), or repair of patellar fractures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">29</xref>) is associated with an increase in infection rate.</p>
<p>In this study, we report the SSI rate for surgical repair of tarsal injuries in greyhounds. In people, the reported SSI rate for clean orthopedic procedures is 0.5% to 6.5% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">30</xref>). While the specific SSI rate reported for foot and ankle surgery is similar at 1.0% to 5.3% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>), it is suspected that it might actually be higher due to reduced ability to mitigate bacterial load with surgical preparation compared to more superior (proximal) surgical sites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">37</xref>). This challenge in surgical preparation holds true for dogs, and may help explain why our SSI rate was higher than previously reported rates in clean veterinary orthopedic procedures. Additionally, higher bacterial loads on dogs&#x2019; skin (compared to humans) has been demonstrated in studies evaluating skin asepsis protocols (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>). This is believed to be at least in part due to the presence of fur, low hygiene (bathing) frequency, and contact with a more contaminated environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>).</p>
<p>Dogs undergoing both a medial and lateral surgical approach were significantly more likely to develop an SSI and require an explantation. In this study, 38.8% of dogs (45/116) underwent bilateral approaches for surgical repair of their orthopedic disease. Of these 45 dogs, 53.3% (24/45) were diagnosed with an SSI and 68.9% (31/45) required explantation. Cases receiving bilateral approaches were reported to have longer anesthesia and surgery times on average compared to dogs undergoing a single surgical approach. Despite the longer anesthesia and surgical times, multivariate statistical analysis revealed that undergoing both a medial and lateral surgical approach retained significant impact on SSI rate and need for explantation when controlling for the extended anesthesia/surgery time. We hypothesize that this increased likelihood of developing an SSI and need for explantation is likely secondary to additional tissue trauma and increased wound tension. When both medial and lateral approaches are performed, the thin skin and sparsity of subcutaneous tissue of greyhounds often poses a challenge with performing incisional closure over implants with some patients having incisions that are left partially open to avoid a tourniquet effect from excessive tension. We suspect that these challenges could contribute to an increase in wound dehiscence and implant exposure. In fact, of the 15 dogs that were reported to have implant exposure, 66.7% (10/15) had both a medial and lateral surgical approach performed. While this finding is of note, the need for both medial and lateral approaches is often unavoidable with specific injury conformations (CTB fractures with concurrent calcaneal fractures, CTB fractures with proximal intertarsal instability, etc.). When bilateral approaches are required, the surgeon should pay utmost attention to minimizing soft tissue trauma and diligent monitoring for SSIs postoperatively.</p>
<p>Dogs that received an elective spay or neuter at the time of surgery were more likely to develop an SSI and require an explantation using univariate analysis. Of the 21 dogs receiving an elective castration at the time of their orthopedic surgery, 61.9% (13/21) were diagnosed with an SSI and 81.0% (17/21) required an explantation. Dogs receiving elective castration were reported to have longer anesthesia and surgery times than those not receiving castration. A previous study in human literature found that undergoing multiple surgical procedures was associated with a significant increase in risk of developing a surgical site infection although this was mainly caused by prolonged duration of surgery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">38</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">39</xref>). However, in our univariate analysis, the effect of dogs undergoing elective castration had a higher impact on developing an SSI and need for explantation than anesthetic or surgery time. We hypothesize that the additional surgical procedure increased the surgical field and may have increased the risk of breaches in sterility. Additional studies are needed to elucidate these findings. Regardless, the potential for increased risk of surgical site infection and explantation should be considered when performing additional surgical procedures concurrently with orthopedic surgical intervention in greyhounds with tarsal injuries.</p>
<p>Longer anesthetic and surgical times were also found to have an increased risk of explantation in our univariate analysis. For each additional 20&#x2009;min of surgery time, the odds ratio of explantation was 1.17. There was a spike in probability of explantation with anesthetic times less than 180&#x2009;min and a dip in probability of explantation with surgical times greater than 240&#x2009;min. This may be explained by the low number of cases with an anesthetic time less than 180&#x2009;min (16/116) or a surgery time greater than 240&#x2009;min (2/116). With the exception of these two deviations, there was a relatively regular progression of increasing risk of explantation with increasing anesthetic and surgical time. Increased duration of surgery has been previously reported as a risk factor for the development of SSI (which was associated with explantation in our study using univariate analysis) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">40</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>). It has been proposed that increased surgical time increases the amount of environmental contamination in surgical wounds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">45</xref>). In addition to increased exposure to environmental contamination, increased surgical time may be associated with more complicated procedures and progressive wound desiccation allowing for increased ability of bacteria to enter the surgical field (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">46</xref>). In agreement with previous studies, our findings support that time under anesthesia and duration of surgery should be limited to minimize the risk of SSI and subsequent explantation.</p>
<p>Patients diagnosed with calcaneal fractures had 2.4 times the odds of requiring an explantation compared to patients without calcaneal fractures using univariate analysis. Additionally, of the 66 calcaneal fractures reported, 57 sustained additional tarsal injury, therefore increasing dissection and surgical time if the other injuries required specific surgical treatment. This may have increased the risk for wound dehiscence or SSI. Patients with calcaneal fractures commonly receive a bone plate as a component of the surgical intervention. The use of a locking plate was found to be associated with an increased risk of developing a surgical site infection and requiring explantation using univariate analysis. When directly comparing the use of locking and nonlocking plates, nonlocking plates show a decreased odds of developing an SSI. This relationship proved similar when evaluating the risk of requiring an explantation. The increased risk of developing an SSI when a locking plate was used (compared to a non-locking plate) is surprising. Locking bone plates and screws have been shown to reduce infection rates compared to conventional dynamic compression plates (DCPs) in previous literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">49</xref>). This protective effect was suggested to be secondary to a lack of perfusion disruption to the cortical bone underlying the plate (compared to DCPs), decreased incidence of inflammation from loosening hardware, and faster bone healing due to a more stable fixation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>). One explanation for our findings may be the lack of requirement for bone contact throughout the length of a locking plate, resulting in a prouder implant that may wear through the thin tissues of greyhounds, resulting in reduced soft tissue coverage and in some cases, implant exposure. An alternative explanation is that in our study, 72.3% of dogs undergoing plating received a locking plate (73/101). This resulted in unequal representation in the data between locking and nonlocking plates.</p>
<p>Patients undergoing arthrodesis of the proximal intertarsal joint had a decreased odds of requiring an explantation on univariate analysis. This finding is interesting as other publications have found explantation rates of up to 21% following partial tarsal arthrodesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">50</xref>) and 12.5% following tarsal arthrodesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>). In this patient population, factors that increased risk of explantation were all surgical interventions requiring significant soft tissue disruption and manipulation. Partial tarsal arthrodesis requires less soft tissue manipulation compared to repair of complex calcaneal fractures. Additionally, proximal tarsal arthrodesis is performed through a single surgical approach compared to a bilateral approach, which is used to address CTB fractures with concurrent calcaneal fractures, the most common injury presentation in our study. Given that this association was found with the univariate analysis, it may be confounded by the effect of surgical approach, so further exploration is warranted.</p>
<p>Limitations to this study are primarily related to the retrospective nature which required a reliance on medical records. This design leads to the presence of confounding factors such as incomplete information regarding clinical signs and complications. Multiple doctors were scrubbed into surgery, and it was not always clear which doctor (and which experience level of doctor, i.e., resident vs. boarded surgeon) performed the procedure or if primary responsibility shifted throughout. Additionally, at the time of last follow up, several patients had a lack of complete healing on radiographs. This limitation in follow-up could have led to complications being missed in some patients. In some cases, these animals may have presented to other veterinarians for care related to the operated limb in the years following which may have led us to underestimate the infection rate and subsequent explant rate for this population of dogs. Lastly, we did not incorporate a control group into this study so we cannot report whether other dog breeds with tarsal injuries would have same complications and complication rates as greyhounds in our care.</p>
<p>It should be noted that our patient population is biased towards more severe, career ending racing injuries. Our institution receives referral for severe racing injuries from a regional racetrack such as comminuted fractures, long-bone fractures, severe intertarsal joint luxation, and calcaneal fractures, whereas greyhounds with CTB fractures that do not include subluxation typically undergo cast immobilization under local veterinary clinic care. This decision is made at the discretion of the overseeing Racing Commission State Veterinarian (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">52</xref>). In 2021 (the most recent report available at the time of this publication), a total of 220 track injuries (not limited to orthopedic injuries) were reported at a single race track. Of these 220 cases, only 21 were referred to our clinic (9.6%). Therefore, our findings cannot and should not be expected to apply to all greyhound tarsal injuries.</p>
<p>The greyhound racing industry has significantly evolved over the course of the last decade. At the time of this publication, only two greyhound racing tracks remain active in the United States and only 7 countries have active greyhound racing programs. As racing greyhounds become less prevalent in the veterinary field, it would be interesting to document the occurrence of tarsal injuries in non-racing or retired greyhounds. This point of investigation could be considered for future research.</p>
<p>We concluded that the SSI rate in this population of greyhounds undergoing surgical repair of closed tarsal injuries is higher than previously reported for clean orthopedic procedures. All greyhounds that presented with open fractures went on to develop a SSI. Additionally, over half of greyhounds undergoing ORIF of tarsal injuries will require explantation of the surgical implant. Although they can do well clinically following explantation, this increases the cost to the owner and the recovery period for the dog. Factors needing further exploration for their association with an increased rate of SSI and explantation included concurrent elective sterilization, calcaneal fractures, use of locking plates, and increased duration of anesthesia and surgery. The information in this study can help guide practitioners&#x2019; clinical expectations and client communications when undertaking these challenging cases. Practitioners performing surgical intervention for tarsal injuries in greyhounds should be prepared for the high likelihood that explantation will be required following healing, particularly those requiring both a medial and lateral surgical approach. Additionally, anesthesia and surgery time should be minimized in these cases due to the possible correlation with increased risk of SSI and explantation. Future consideration should be given to explore alternative surgical techniques for managing these cases such as minimally invasive approaches or the use of external skeletal fixation with the goal of lowering the SSI and explantation rate in this patient population.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec20">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>Ethical review and approval was not required for the animal study because this was a retrospective study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>NK and JD contributed to the conception and design of the study. NK, JD, AW, SJ, ST, MB, BC, KS, and CF contributed to the data collection and organization for the study. MB wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec23">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>The authors thank Rebecca Garabed for statistical advisory and support in data analysis. The authors would also like to thank Lori Bohenko for contribution and personal communication regarding greyhound racetrack injuries.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guilliard</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>The nature, incidence and response to treatment of injuries to the distal limbs in the racing greyhound a thesis presented for the Diploma of Fellowship of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons</source>. <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons</publisher-name> (<year>2012</year>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>KA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muir</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nicoll</surname> <given-names>RG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roush</surname> <given-names>JK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Asymmetric adaptive modeling of central tarsal bones in racing greyhounds</article-title>. <source>Bone</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>257</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00313-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bukowiecki</surname> <given-names>CF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bramlage</surname> <given-names>LR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gabel</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title><italic>In vitro</italic> strength of the suspensory apparatus in training and resting horses</article-title>. <source>Vet Surg</source>. (<year>1987</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>126</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-950x.1987.tb00923.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3507130</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bergh</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Piras</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Samii</surname> <given-names>VF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weisbrode</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>KA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Fractures in regions of adaptive modeling and remodeling of central tarsal bones in racing greyhounds</article-title>. <source>Am J Vet Res</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>73</volume>:<fpage>375</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2460/ajvr.73.3.375</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22369529</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hickman</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Greyhound injuries</article-title>. <source>J Small Anim Pract</source>. (<year>1975</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>455</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1748-5827.1975.tb05772.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sicard</surname> <given-names>GK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Short</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manley</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A survey of injuries at five greyhound racing tracks</article-title>. <source>J Small Anim Pract</source>. (<year>1999</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>428</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1748-5827.1999.tb03117.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10516949</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prole</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A survey of racing injuries in the greyhound</article-title>. <source>J Small Anim Pract</source>. (<year>1976</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1748-5827.1976.tb06951.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">933469</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boudrieau</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dee</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dee</surname> <given-names>LG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Central tarsal bone fractures in the racing greyhound: a review of 114 cases</article-title>. <source>J Am Vet Med Assoc</source>. (<year>1984</year>) <volume>184</volume>:<fpage>1486</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>91</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6735872</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ost</surname> <given-names>PC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dee</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dee</surname> <given-names>LG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hohn</surname> <given-names>RB</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Fractures of the calcaneus in racing greyhounds</article-title>. <source>Vet Surg</source>. (<year>1987</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-950x.1987.tb00913.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3507125</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guilliard</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Third tarsal bone fractures in the greyhound</article-title>. <source>J Small Anim Pract</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>51</volume>:<fpage>635</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1748-5827.2010.01004.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21121918</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Montavon</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dee</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weiss</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Distal tibial articular fractures in the racing greyhounds: a review of six cases</article-title>. <source>Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol</source>. (<year>1993</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1055/s-0038-1633113</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dee</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Tarsal injuries</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Bloomberg</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dee</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Canine sports medicine and surgery</source>, <edition>1st</edition> ed. <publisher-loc>St. Louis, Mo</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Saunders</publisher-name> (<year>1998</year>). <fpage>120</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dee</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Fractures of the tarsus</article-title> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Houlton</surname> <given-names>JEF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vannini</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>AO principles of fracture management in the dog and cat</source>, <publisher-name>Davos Platz Switzerland Stuttgart: AO Pub</publisher-name> (<year>2005</year>). <fpage>349</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Corr</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A comparison of outcomes following tibial plateau levelling osteotomy and cranial tibial wedge osteotomy procedures</article-title>. <source>Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>312</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1160/vcot-07-02-0013</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18038011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dee</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dee</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Piermattei</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Classification, management, and repair of central tarsal fractures in the racing greyhound</article-title>. <source>J Am Anim Hosp Assoc</source>. (<year>1976</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>398</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>405</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guilliard</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Fractures of the central tarsal bone in eight racing greyhounds</article-title>. <source>Vet Rec</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>147</volume>:<fpage>512</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/vr.147.18.512</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11110492</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dyce</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Houlton</surname> <given-names>JEF</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Calcaneoquartal arthrodesis in the dog</article-title>. <source>J Small Anim Pract</source>. (<year>1993</year>) <volume>34</volume>:<fpage>205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1748-5827.1993.tb02663.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boudrieau</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dee</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dee</surname> <given-names>LG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Treatment of central tarsal bone fractures in the racing greyhound</article-title>. <source>J Am Vet Med Assoc</source>. (<year>1984</year>) <volume>184</volume>:<fpage>1492</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>500</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6735873</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Swaim</surname> <given-names>SF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bradley</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vaughn</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powers</surname> <given-names>RD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoffman</surname> <given-names>CE</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The greyhound dog as a model for studying pressure ulcers</article-title>. <source>Decubitus</source>. (<year>1993</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>38</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>40</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8318156</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fowler</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Distal limb and paw injuries</article-title>. <source>Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>36</volume>:<fpage>819</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cvsm.2006.02.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Holmberg</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The use of prophylactic penicillin in orthopedic surgery: a clinical trial</article-title>. <source>Vet Surg</source>. (<year>1985</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>160</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-950X.1985.tb00850.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weese</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A review of post-operative infections in veterinary orthopaedic surgery</article-title>. <source>Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>99</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>105</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3415/VCOT-07-11-0105</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Verwilghen</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Fighting surgical site infections in small animals: are we getting anywhere?</article-title> <source>Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>45</volume>:<fpage>243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cvsm.2014.11.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Whittem</surname> <given-names>TL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>CW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schaeffer</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coolman</surname> <given-names>BR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Averill</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Effect of perioperative prophylactic antimicrobial treatment in dogs undergoing elective orthopedic surgery</article-title>. <source>J Am Vet Med Assoc</source>. (<year>1999</year>) <volume>215</volume>:<fpage>212</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10416474</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turk</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weese</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Prospective surgical site infection surveillance in dogs</article-title>. <source>Vet Surg</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>44</volume>:<fpage>2</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12267.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25196800</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Armstrong</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bruce</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kulendra</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pease</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perry</surname> <given-names>KL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Injuries involving the central tarsal bone in nonracing dogs: short-term outcomes and prognostic factors</article-title>. <source>Vet Surg</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>48</volume>:<fpage>524</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/vsu.13187</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30820980</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bohling</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henderson</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swaim</surname> <given-names>SF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kincaid</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Comparison of the role of the subcutaneous tissues in cutaneous wound healing in the dog and cat</article-title>. <source>Vet Surg</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>35</volume>:<fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00105.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><label>28.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sprowls</surname> <given-names>GR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>BC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>TJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pruszynski</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hammonds</surname> <given-names>KAP</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Predictive value of lateral soft tissue thickness for complications after total hip arthroplasty with a lateral incision</article-title>. <source>Bayl Univ Med Cent Proc</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>33</volume>:<fpage>336</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/08998280.2020.1753455</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><label>29.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The radiographic soft tissue thickness is associated with wound complications after open reduction and internal fixation of patella fractures</article-title>. <source>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>23</volume>:<fpage>539</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12891-022-05498-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><label>30.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zgonis</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jolly</surname> <given-names>GP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garbalosa</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The efficacy of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in elective foot and ankle surgery</article-title>. <source>J Foot Ankle Surg</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>43</volume>:<fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>103</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1053/j.jfas.2004.01.003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15057856</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><label>31.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feilmeier</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dayton</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sedberry</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reimer</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Incidence of surgical site infection in the foot and ankle with early exposure and showering of surgical sites: a prospective observation</article-title>. <source>J Foot Ankle Surg</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>53</volume>:<fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1053/j.jfas.2013.12.021</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24556483</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><label>32.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wukich</surname> <given-names>DK</given-names></name> <name><surname>McMillen</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lowery</surname> <given-names>NJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frykberg</surname> <given-names>RG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Surgical site infections after foot and ankle surgery: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes</article-title>. <source>Diabetes Care</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>34</volume>:<fpage>2211</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2337/dc11-0846</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21816974</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><label>33.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sticha</surname> <given-names>RS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swiriduk</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wertheimer</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Prospective analysis of postoperative wound infections using an early exposure method of wound care</article-title>. <source>J Foot Ankle Surg</source>. (<year>1998</year>) <volume>37</volume>:<fpage>286</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>91</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1067-2516(98)80064-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9710780</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><label>34.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hugar</surname> <given-names>DW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Newman</surname> <given-names>PS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hugar</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spencer</surname> <given-names>RB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salvino</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Incidence of postoperative infection in a free-standing ambulatory surgery center</article-title>. <source>J Foot Surg</source>. (<year>1990</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>265</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2380498</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><label>35.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Donley</surname> <given-names>BG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Philbin</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomford</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sferra</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Foot and ankle infections after surgery</article-title>. <source>Clin Orthop Relat Res</source>. (<year>2001</year>) <volume>391</volume>:<fpage>162</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00003086-200110000-00017</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><label>36.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>WA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Postoperative wound infection in foot and ankle surgery</article-title>. <source>Foot Ankle</source>. (<year>1983</year>) <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>102</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/107110078300400211</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><label>37.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ostrander</surname> <given-names>RV</given-names></name> <name><surname>Botte</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brage</surname> <given-names>ME</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Efficacy of surgical preparation solutions in foot and ankle surgery</article-title>. <source>J Bone Joint Surg Am</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>87</volume>:<fpage>980</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2106/JBJS.D.01977</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><label>38.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Belo</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Serrano</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cunha</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carneiro</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tavares</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miguel Carreira</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine</article-title>. <source>BMC Vet Res</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>95</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12917-018-1368-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29540169</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><label>39.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Verberk</surname> <given-names>JDM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meijs</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vos</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schreurs</surname> <given-names>LMA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geerlings</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Greeff</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Contribution of prior, multiple-, and repetitive surgeries to the risk of surgical site infections in the Netherlands</article-title>. <source>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>38</volume>:<fpage>1298</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>305</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/ice.2017.195</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28918773</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><label>40.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>DC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Conzemius</surname> <given-names>MG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shofer</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swann</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Epidemiologic evaluation of postoperative wound infections in dogs and cats</article-title>. <source>J Am Vet Med Assoc</source>. (<year>1997</year>) <volume>210</volume>:<fpage>1302</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9143534</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><label>41.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nicholson</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beal</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shofer</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>DC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Epidemiologic evaluation of postoperative wound infection in clean-contaminated wounds: a retrospective study of 239 dogs and cats</article-title>. <source>Vet Surg</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>577</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1053/jvet.2002.34661</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12415527</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><label>42.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yap</surname> <given-names>FW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Calvo</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>KD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parkin</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Perioperative risk factors for surgical site infection in tibial tuberosity advancement: 224 stifles</article-title>. <source>Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<fpage>199</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3415/VCOT-14-09-0141</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25757496</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><label>43.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nazarali</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weese</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Perioperative administration of antimicrobials during tibial plateau leveling osteotomy</article-title>. <source>Vet Surg</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>43</volume>:<fpage>966</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12269.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25196889</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><label>44.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beal</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>DC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shofer</surname> <given-names>FS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The effects of perioperative hypothermia and the duration of anesthesia on postoperative wound infection rate in clean wounds: a retrospective study</article-title>. <source>Vet Surg</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-950x.2000.00123.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10730705</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><label>45.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Sugical site inections</article-title> In: DG Mayhall, Ed., <source>Hospital epidemiology and infeciton control</source>. <edition>2nd</edition> Philadelphia: Lippincott (<year>1999</year>). <fpage>189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>210</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><label>46.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weese</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Wound infections and antimicrobial use</article-title> In: <source>Veterinary surgery: small animal: volume 1</source>, <edition>2nd</edition> ed. <publisher-name>St. Louis, MO: Elsevier</publisher-name> (<year>2018</year>). <fpage>148</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><label>47.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Solano</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Danielski</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kovach</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fitzpatrick</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farrell</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Locking plate and screw fixation after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy reduces postoperative infection rate in dogs over 50 kg</article-title>. <source>Vet Surg</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>44</volume>:<fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12212.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24861524</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><label>48.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eijer</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hauke</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arens</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Printzen</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schlegel</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perren</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>PC-fix and local infection resistance&#x2014;influence of implant design on postoperative infection development, clinical and experimental results</article-title>. <source>Injury</source>. (<year>2001</year>) <volume>32</volume>:<fpage>B38</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00124-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11718737</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><label>49.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arens</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eijer</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schlegel</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Printzen</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perren</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hansis</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Influence of the design for fixation implants on local infection: experimental study of dynamic compression plates versus point contact fixators in rabbits</article-title>. <source>J Orthop Trauma</source>. (<year>1999</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>470</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00005131-199909000-00002</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10513968</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><label>50.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scrimgeour</surname> <given-names>AB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bruce</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bridges</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walsh</surname> <given-names>VP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Worth</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Long-term outcomes after partial tarsal arthrodesis in working farm dogs in New Zealand</article-title>. <source>N Z Vet J</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>60</volume>:<fpage>50</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00480169.2011.627065</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><label>51.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roch</surname> <given-names>SP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clements</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>RAS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Downes</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gemmill</surname> <given-names>TJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Macias</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Complications following tarsal arthrodesis using bone plate fixation in dogs</article-title>. <source>J Small Anim Pract</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>49</volume>:<fpage>117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1748-5827.2007.00468.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18086158</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><label>52.</label><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bohenko</surname> <given-names>Lori</given-names></name></person-group>, <source>State veterinarian at West Virginia Racing Commission</source>. (<year>2022</year>).</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
