<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Vet. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Veterinary Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Vet. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2297-1769</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2023.1223436</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Veterinary Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Identification of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> sporozoite immunodominant mimotopes by random phage-display peptide libraries&#x2013;a proof of concept study</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ju&#x00E1;rez-Estrada</surname>
<given-names>Marco A.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1335678/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tellez-Isaias</surname>
<given-names>Guillermo</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/147616/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Graham</surname>
<given-names>Danielle M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/383527/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Laverty</surname>
<given-names>Lauren</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2322423/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gayosso-V&#x00E1;zquez</surname>
<given-names>Amanda</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Alonso-Morales</surname>
<given-names>Rogelio A.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1340512/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Departamento de Medicina y Zootecnia de Aves, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Aut&#x00F3;noma de M&#x00E9;xico</institution>, <addr-line>Mexico City</addr-line>, <country>Mexico</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Departamento de Gen&#x00E9;tica y Bioestad&#x00ED;stica, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Aut&#x00F3;noma de M&#x00E9;xico</institution>, <addr-line>Mexico City</addr-line>, <country>Mexico</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas</institution>, <addr-line>Fayetteville, AR</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn0001" fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Yadong Zheng, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, China</p></fn>
<fn id="fn0002" fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Keyu Zhang, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China; Reginaldo G. Bastos, Washington State University, United States</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Rogelio A. Alonso-Morales, <email>ralonsom@unam.mx</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>24</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>1223436</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>16</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>06</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Ju&#x00E1;rez-Estrada, Tellez-Isaias, Graham, Laverty, Gayosso-V&#x00E1;zquez and Alonso-Morales.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Ju&#x00E1;rez-Estrada, Tellez-Isaias, Graham, Laverty, Gayosso-V&#x00E1;zquez and Alonso-Morales</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Coccidiosis, caused by parasites of numerous <italic>Eimeria</italic> species, has long been recognized as an economically significant disease in the chicken industry worldwide. The rise of anti-coccidian resistance has driven a search for other parasite management techniques. Recombinant antigen vaccination presents a highly feasible alternative. Properly identifying antigens that might trigger a potent immune response is one of the major obstacles to creating a viable genetically modified vaccine.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>This study evaluated a reverse immunology approach for the identification of B-cell epitopes. Antisera from rabbits and hens inoculated with whole-sporozoites of <italic>E. tenella</italic> were used to identify Western blot antigens. The rabbit IgG fraction from the anti-sporozoite serum exhibited the highest reactogenicity; consequently, it was purified and utilized to screen two random Phage-display peptide libraries (12 mer and c7c mer). After three panning rounds, 20 clones from each library were randomly selected, their nucleotide sequences acquired, and their reactivity to anti-sporozoite <italic>E. tenella</italic> serum assessed. The selected peptide clones inferred amino acid sequences matched numerous <italic>E. tenella</italic> proteins.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results and Conclusions</title>
<p>The extracellular domain of the epidermal growth factor-like (EGF-like) repeats, and the thrombospondin type-I (TSP-1) repeats of <italic>E. tenella</italic> micronemal protein 4 (EtMIC4) matched with the c7c mer selected clones CNTGSPYEC (2/20) and CMSTGLSSC (1/20) respectively. The clone CSISSLTHC that matched with a conserved hypothetical protein of <italic>E. tenella</italic> was widely selected (3/20). Selected clones from the 12-mer phage display library AGHTTQFNSKTT (7/20), GPNSAFWAGSER (2/20) and HFAYWWNGVRGP (8/20) showed similarities with a cullin homolog, elongation factor-2 and beta-dynein chain a putative <italic>E. tenella</italic> protein, respectively. Four immunodominant clones were previously selected and used to immunize rabbits. By ELISA and Western blot, all rabbit anti-clone serums detected <italic>E. tenella</italic> native antigens.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Thus, selected phagotopes contained recombinant <italic>E. tenella</italic> antigen peptides. Using antibodies against <italic>E. tenella</italic> sporozoites, this study demonstrated the feasibility of screening Phage-display random peptide libraries for true immunotopes. In addition, this study looked at an approach for finding novel candidates that could be used as an <italic>E. tenella</italic> recombinant epitope-based vaccine.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Apicomplexa</kwd>
<kwd>2nd-generation merozoites</kwd>
<kwd>reverse immunology</kwd>
<kwd>Et-MIC4</kwd>
<kwd>TRAP-family</kwd>
<kwd>Et EF-2</kwd>
<kwd>beta-dynein chain</kwd>
<kwd>ankyrin-repeat</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="60"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="10523"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Parasitology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Avian coccidia belongs to the Eimeriidae family and the phylum Apicomplexa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>). <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> is one of the most pathogenic species of avian coccidiosis, causing massive economic damage to the global poultry industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>). Several live vaccines consisting of either virulent or attenuated coccidian strains have been commercially developed in recent years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>). Live oocyst vaccines are a limited but useful option to prophylactic medicine; however, a recombinant vaccine with specific parasite antigens that develop strong protective coccidia-immunity would be preferable (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>). Several studies have identified potential protective antigens from <italic>Eimeria</italic> such as AMA1, EF-1&#x03B1;, EF-2, MIC-1, MIC-2, MIC-3, IMP-1, LDH1, SAG1, Gam22, Gam 56, Gam 82, Rhomboid-like Protein, Profilin and SO7, however, attempts to produce a successful commercial recombinant vaccine have been hindered until now (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>).</p>
<p>Immune responses to <italic>Eimeria</italic> infections involve numerous aspects of innate and adaptive/acquired immunity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>). Although protective immunity to <italic>Eimeria</italic> includes both cellular and humoral immune pathways, it is commonly assumed that the primary role is based on a robust cell-mediated response, with antibodies presumably playing a minor role (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>). Nonetheless, it appears that antibodies play a significant role in protection under specific conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>). Class B epitopes have been found in all seven species of chicken coccidia, indicating that this antigen class may protect chickens from coccidiosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>). As a result, an effective recombinant vaccine against coccidiosis should contain both lymphocyte type T and B antigens to elicit a successful cellular immune response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>). However, a better definition of protective B-cell epitopes from <italic>Eimeri</italic>a species is still needed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>). It is critical to discover the involvement of specific proteins from different life-cycle stages of the <italic>Eimeria</italic>, possibly those engaged in the earliest steps of invasion and all those associated with pathogenesis and parasite survival (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>).</p>
<p>The main objective of epitope identification is to replace complex antigens used for immunization programs, antibody production, and even serodiagnosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>). Additionally, with an appropriate methodology, it is easier to find a peptide that can induce either antibody production or T-cell induction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>).</p>
<p>Phage-display technology is a low-cost, high-performance screening approach for identifying peptides with high molecular affinity to specific antibodies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>). Epitope discovery is critical in diagnostics, immunotherapy, drug discovery, and vaccine development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>). This methodology enables the selection of mimotopes, peptides that replicate a pathogen&#x2019;s native epitopes, even without prior knowledge of the natural ligand region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>). M13 Phage display vectors combine peptide gene sequences to coat protein genes, usually gIII or gVIII. Therefore, nucleotide sequencing of the phage DNA can be used to determine the amino acid sequence of the selected peptide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>). Rounds of screening (panning) can be used to select specific peptides with affinity to a ligand from Phage display libraries, exposing billions of peptides variants present in the libraries to an immobilized ligand and washing away unspecific phages, amplifying the bound phage by infecting <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>).</p>
<p>The selection of peptides from random Phage display libraries by specific antibodies is an attractive strategy for the possible generation of pure epitope vaccines based on phagotopes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>). In recent years, screening Phage-display libraries with specific antibodies has become an attractive strategy for designing anticoccidial therapies to control this disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>).</p>
<p>Although monoclonal antibodies are excellent mimotope selectors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>), polyclonal antibodies are generally favored because they are widely available and may find novel immunogenic epitopes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>). Due to the pathogen&#x2019;s thousands of years of co-evolution to avoid the immune response, epitope selection with the host&#x2019;s polyclonal antiserum might be difficult (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>). An alternative approach to effective epitope identification is using antibodies generated in unnatural host species, where the hidden vital antigens for the natural host may be recognized, producing antibodies against them (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>).</p>
<p>The phage display library technique is relatively new for peptide-based parasite vaccine development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">29</xref>), and it has never been used before in screening <italic>E. tenella</italic> sporozoite mimotopes for possible vaccinations against the disease. Therefore, in the present investigation, rabbit sera antibodies generated against sporozoites of <italic>E. tenella</italic> were used to screen two Phage display random peptides libraries in order to identify highly immunogenic epitopes involved in <italic>E. tenella</italic> infection. Using these heterologous antisera, we were able to identify highly immunoreactive sporozoite epitopes from <italic>E. tenella</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Parasites</title>
<p>The wild-type strain of <italic>E. tenella</italic> used in this research was isolated from birds showing clinical signs of cecal coccidia on a broiler farm in Quer&#x00E9;taro, Mexico&#x2019;s central state. The oocysts of <italic>E. tenella</italic> were purified using the method reported by Stephan et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">30</xref>). Three-week-old Leghorn Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) chickens (SPAFAS Inc., Norwich, CT, United States) were used to propagate oocysts. Following established procedures, cecal oocysts were isolated, sporulated, and cleaned (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Sporozoites and second generation of merozoites antigens preparation</title>
<p>Sporocysts were released by vortexed sporulated oocysts (2.5 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup>/ml) at 2,000 X g using 1&#x2009;mm diameter glass beads (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., Burlington, MA, United States) for 1&#x2009;min. A 50% Percoll gradient (density 1.13&#x2009;g/mL, GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, United States) was used to purify sporocysts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>). 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup> purified sporocysts were resuspended in an excystation medium and incubated at 42&#x00B0;C for 150&#x2009;min. PBS (pH 7.4) with 0.75% (w/v) taurodeoxycholic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., Burlington, MA, United States) and 0.25% (w/v) trypsin from porcine pancreas Type II-S (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., Burlington, MA, United States) comprised the excystation medium. Sporozoites (Sz) were washed and purified using a 60% Percoll gradient (density 1.13&#x2009;g/mL, GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, United States). Sporozoites were resuspended in sterile PBS for the immunization program, gradually frozen at &#x2212;70&#x00B0;C at a 1&#x00B0;C/min rate, and then stored at &#x2212;70&#x00B0;C until use.</p>
<p>Three 10-week-old hybrid pullets were gavage-inoculated with 5 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup> sporulated oocysts of <italic>E. tenella</italic> and euthanized 112&#x2009;h post-infection (PI) to collect second-generation merozoites (Mz). These birds&#x2019; intestines were treated for merozoite isolation, as described previously by Liu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>). The merozoites were purified using the method outlined by Geysen et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">34</xref>). Each parasite (Sz and Mz) was suspended in sterile PBS with a protease inhibitor (cOmpleteTM Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany). Five freeze/thaw cycles each disrupted both asexual zoite stages. The final suspension was centrifuged at 2,000 x g for 18&#x2009;min at 4&#x00B0;C. The supernatants were collected, and the protein concentration was measured with the Bradford reagent (BioRad, Hercules, CA, United States) using a bovine serum albumin standard curve (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., Burlington, MA, United States). Antigen suspensions were kept in 200&#x2009;&#x03BC;L aliquots at &#x2212;70&#x00B0;C until needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Rabbit and chicken antisera against whole sporozoites of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic></title>
<p>Two white New Zealand rabbits (2.5&#x2009;kg) and two SPF White Leghorn chickens (1.1&#x2009;kg) were immunized subcutaneously with 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;g of purified whole sporozoites (5.3 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup> sporozoites), diluted 1:1 with the IMS 1313&#x2009;N VG PR nanoparticle adjuvant (Seppic Montanide&#x2122;, France) in a total volume of 1&#x2009;mL as previously was described by Ju&#x00E1;rez-Estrada et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>). Three further immunizations were given at two-week intervals. Both rabbits were euthanized by exsanguination 1&#x2009;week after the last immunization. After clotting for 1&#x2009;h at room temperature and overnight at 4&#x00B0;C, the blood was centrifuged at 2000 X g for 5&#x2009;min, and serum samples were aliquoted and stored at &#x2212;20&#x00B0;C until use. Both SPF Leghorn chickens were wing-bled, and serum was extracted by clotting it for 1&#x2009;h at room temperature and overnight at 4&#x00B0;C, then centrifuged at 2000 X g for 5&#x2009;min, aliquoted, and stored at &#x2212;20&#x00B0;C until needed. According to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions, the rabbit serum&#x2019;s IgG fraction was purified by affinity chromatography using Sepharose 4 FF protein G (GE HLS Marlborough, Mass., United States).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<title>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)</title>
<p>The reactogenicity of the bird&#x2019;s and rabbit&#x2019;s anti-sporozoite sera, the rabbit anticlone serum, and the purified rabbit IgG fraction to sporozoite and 2nd generation merozoite antigens were evaluated by ELISA, essentially, as Constantinoiu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>) described it. 96-well microtiter plates (MaxiSorb, Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated overnight at 4&#x00B0;C with 1&#x2009;&#x03BC;g of sporozoite or merozoite antigen in 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of carbonate buffer (0.1&#x2009;M sodium bicarbonate and 0.1&#x2009;M sodium carbonate buffer, pH 9.6). The control wells were incubated with only 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of carbonate buffer. After four washes on a shaker with a saline solution (S) (120&#x2009;mM NaCl, 25&#x2009;mM Tris&#x2013;HCl, pH 7.9) containing 1% Tween 20 (ST), non-specific binding sites were blocked by incubating for 1&#x2009;h at 37&#x00B0;C in a static oven with 110&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of 5% skim milk in ST (STM). Sera diluted in STM (1:10 and 1:100) were added to the test and control wells after four ST washes, and both were then incubated for 1&#x2009;h at 37&#x00B0;C. Each plate included negative control sera from unimmunized SPF Leghorn chickens. Following incubation, the plates were washed four times with ST and incubated with their respective secondary antibody peroxidase conjugate diluted 1:2000 with STM (anti-rabbit, anti-chicken) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc. West Grove, PA, United States). After 1&#x2009;h at 37&#x00B0;C, the plates were washed four times. The enzymatic reaction was developed by adding 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of OPD chromogen (o-phenylendiamine dihydrochloride SIGMA, St. Louis MO, USA) at 5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/10&#x2009;mL in citrate buffer (0.1&#x2009;M citric acid, 0.1&#x2009;M sodium citrate p.H. 4.5, and 20&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of 30% hydrogen peroxide) for 10&#x2009;min in a shaker under dark conditions. An ELISA microplate spectrophotometer (Epoch, BioTek, Winooski, VT, United States) was used to read the absorbance produced by substrate hydrolysis at 450&#x2009;nm. All serum samples were examined in duplicate thrice times.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>SDS-PAGE and Western blot</title>
<p>For SDS-PAGE analysis of both asexual zoite phases, 20&#x2009;&#x03BC;g of each purified fraction was separated by 12% SDS-PAGE under standard reducing conditions. According to Constantinoiu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>), the resolved proteins were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) or electrotransferred on polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (PVDF) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). PVDF membranes were probed with anti-sporozoite of <italic>E. tenella</italic> sera from rabbits and Leghorn fowl. As a secondary antibody, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated IgG goat anti-rabbit IgG, and (HRP)-conjugated IgG goat anti-chicken IgY (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Philadelphia, PA, United States) were employed at a 1: 1500 (v/v) in 5% (w/v) STM. Tablets of DAB SigmaFast&#x2122; (3,3&#x2032;-diaminobenzidine) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis MO, United States) at 10&#x2009;mg/5&#x2009;mL were used to visualize the PVDF membranes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<title>Screening of a phage-display library and characterization of selected clones</title>
<p>IgG fraction purified from rabbits previously immunized with sporozoites of <italic>E. tenella</italic> was used to screen commercially available dodecapeptide (Ph.D.-12TM) and cysteine-constrained heptapeptide (Ph.D.-C7CTM) M13 pIII libraries (New England Biolabs Inc., Ipswich, MA, United States). Three rounds of clone selection were performed for each screening using progressively decreasing quantities of antibodies (20&#x2009;&#x03BC;g, 10&#x2009;&#x03BC;g, and 5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g, respectively). Briefly, two wells in a 96-well polystyrene microtiter plate (Maxisorb, Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated and incubated at 4&#x00B0;C overnight (O/N) with IgG in sterile phosphate chloride buffer (PCB) (0.1&#x2009;M potassium chloride, 3&#x2009;mM sodium chloride, 5&#x2009;mM sodium phosphate dibasic, 1&#x2009;mM potassium phosphate monobasic). Wells were washed five times with 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 in 0.01&#x2009;M phosphate-buffered saline (TPBS), pH 7.2, then blocked with BSA (5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/mL in distilled H2O). Every plate was incubated for 1&#x2009;h at room temperature with 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>10</sup> plaque-forming units (pfu) of each phage library. After washing with TPBS, the bound phages were eluted with 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of 0.1&#x2009;M glycine-HCl, pH 2.2 (hereafter referred to as &#x201C;eluate&#x201D;) and immediately neutralized with 15&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of 1&#x2009;M Tris&#x2013;HCl, pH 9.1. The eluate phages were amplified and titer through infection of the <italic>E. coli</italic> strain ER2738 (New England Biolabs Inc., Ipswich, MA, United States). The phages were titled as plaque-forming units by ml (pfu/ml). For the next round of phage-display screening, every phage-display library eluate was amplified and concentrated with polyethylene glycol-8000 PEG/2.5&#x2009;M NaCl (20%/40%) following the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. The phage input and output titers ratio was used to calculate the specific phage enrichment level.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>Phage clone selection and nucleotide sequence analysis</title>
<p>An aliquot of approximately 100 pfu from the third-round panning was combined with <italic>E. coli</italic> ER2738 and plated on LB agar with IPTG (isopropyl-&#x03B2;-D thiogalactopyranoside) and X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl-&#x03B2;-D-galactopyranoside). After 37&#x00B0;C O/N growth, twenty separate isolated phage plaques per library were randomly collected (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;40). Each plaque was grown in 2XYT broth containing a dilution of 1/1000 of <italic>E. coli</italic> strain ER2738 grown O/N and incubated for 5&#x2009;h at 37&#x00B0;C at 250&#x2009;rpm. Following standard procedures, single-stranded phage DNA was isolated using an iodide buffer extraction, precipitated with 1 volume of ethanol, and resuspended in nuclease-free distilled water (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Waltham, MA, United States). Purified phage DNA was sequenced with the Big Dye Terminator v1.1&#x2009;cycle sequencing kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) using the pIII primer (5&#x2019;-CCAGACGTTAGTAAATG-3&#x2032;).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>Bioinformatic analysis</title>
<p>Using the Clone Manager Professional Edition program, version 9.0 (Scientific and educational software, Cary, NC, United States), the amino acid sequences of the peptide were determined from the nucleotide sequences. The protein BLAST software<xref rid="fn0003" ref-type="fn"><sup>1</sup></xref> was used to screen the selected clones in the published sequences of the <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> genome. The settings for the search were: Database: non-redundant protein sequence (nr); organism: <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> (taxid: 5802); algorithm: blast (protein&#x2013;protein BLAST).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>Immune reactivity assessment of phage&#x2013;displayed clones to rabbit and chicken anti-sporozoite serum by ELISA</title>
<p>ELISA reactogenicity to the selected phage clones was assessed using the pooled anti-sporozoite serum from both rabbits immunized with sporozoites of <italic>E. tenella</italic>. Briefly, phage&#x2013;displayed clones were bound to microtiter plates (MaxiSorb, Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) and developed with the anti-sporozoite sera diluted (1:10 and 1:100). Wild-type M13 phage and a clone of M13 phage (Ph.D. 12mer and c7c libraries) from screening with pseudorabies virus rabbit IgGs were used as negative controls. The total phage elution of the third round panning of both libraries was amplified and used as a positive control. After four washes with SS, the anti-sporozoite antibodies were detected using a secondary anti-rabbit IgG or anti-chicken IgY peroxidase conjugate diluted at 1:2,000 in blocking solution for 1&#x2009;h at 37&#x00B0;C (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc. West Grove, PA, United States). The plate was then washed four more times with SS before adding 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of TMB chromogen at 1&#x2009;mg/10&#x2009;mL in citrate buffer (3,3&#x2032;,5,5&#x2032;-Tetramethylbenzidine, Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., Burlington, MA, United States), the addition of 2&#x2009;N sulfuric acid stopped this reaction. An ELISA reader (Epoch, BioTek, Winooski, VT, United States) was used to determine the color intensity at 450&#x2009;nm. Otherwise, the antisera reactivity of phage-immunized rabbits was determined in phage-ELISA format using 1&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/well of <italic>E. tenella</italic> sporozoite and merozoite as antigens.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<title>Rabbit antisera against each selected phage clone</title>
<p>Rabbit antisera for every one of the four most relevant phage clones were obtained. Candidate phage clones were selected based on the following criteria: (i) highest frequency selection during the screening process, and (ii) highest reactivity in the ELISA test (e.g., Ph.D. 12mer 15: HFAYWWNGVRGP; Ph.D. 12 mer 18: AGHTTQFNSKTT; Ph.D. c7c 1: CNTGSPYEC; Ph.D. c7c 7: CSISSLTHC). One rabbit by each clone was subcutaneously immunized with 1&#x2009;mL containing 2 &#x00D7; 10<sup>12</sup> pfu in sterile PBS, mixed 1:1 with the adjuvant ISA 50&#x2009;V (Seppic Montanide &#x2122;, France). Six immunizations were applied at intervals of 2&#x2009;weeks each. The immunological reactogenicity and specificity of every antiserum from phage-immunized rabbits were evaluated by ELISA and Western blot, as already described before.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Data were analyzed using the SAS/STAT 9.2 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Overall differences between groups were analyzed using ANOVA test. The mean value with respective standard deviation (SD) was calculated. A post-hoc analysis (Tukey&#x2019;s test at <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) was performed after the overall analysis showed significant differences between all groups.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec14">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec15">
<title>Characterization of rabbit and bird anti-sporozoite sera by ELISA</title>
<p>Time-course of the reactogenicity of the anti-sporozoite sera from rabbits and birds immunized with whole-sporozoites of <italic>E. tenella</italic> was evaluated. <xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref> shows the kinetics of <italic>E. tenella</italic> anti-sporozoite sera production in rabbits (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1A</xref>) and birds (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1B</xref>), assessed by its reactivity to sporozoite and merozoite; we can observe that rabbit and bird antisera cross-react to both asexual zoite stages in a similar pattern. Similar levels of antibody production were observed in rabbits and chickens; however, bird titers reached a plateau after 2 weeks, whereas rabbit titers did not reach a plateau until 4&#x2009;weeks. Even though only sporozoites were used for immunization schedule, the immune response to the second generation of merozoites exhibited similar reactivity to the sporozoite antigen and followed the same dynamic pattern, indicating the presence of the same or cross-reacted antigens between both asexual zoite stages. Antisera diluted 1:100 showed better reactivity against the sporozoite than the merozoite (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1B</xref>). At 7&#x2009;week post-first immunization titers in rabbits against both asexual zoite stages are more homogenous than titers observed in birds at this same time indicating more affinity from rabbit antibodies toward both antigens.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Immunization with whole-sporozoites of <italic>E. tenella</italic> to rabbits <bold>(A)</bold> and chickens <bold>(B)</bold>. The dynamics of antibody production in rabbits <bold>(A)</bold> and chickens <bold>(B)</bold> were assessed by ELISA against sporozoite (Sz) and second generation of merozoite (Mz) antigens, after immunization with sporozoites of <italic>E. tenella</italic>, at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 6 (&#x2193;). The rabbit and chicken antisera were diluted at 1:10 (&#x25B2;) and 1:100 (&#x25B3;) againt Sz antigen, and the rabbit and chicken antisera were diluted at 1:10 (&#x25CF;) and 1:100 (&#x25CB;) against Mz antigen. Preimmune sera were diluted 1:10 and exposed to Sz (&#x25A1;) or Mz (&#x25A0;) antigens. Figures represent mean ODs (&#x00B1; SD). Different letters on the same data indicate statistical differences: &#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05 (ANOVA followed by the Tukey post-hoc test).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-10-1223436-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<title>Reactivity in Western blot from two life-cycle stages of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> using anti-sporozoite sera</title>
<p>Reactogenicity of the anti-sporozoite sera from rabbits and birds immunized with whole-sporozoites of <italic>E. tenella</italic> against polypeptides of two asexual zoite stages of <italic>E. tenella</italic> was evaluated. <xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2A</xref> shows the sporozoite and merozoite proteins separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. Although a complex protein profile of sporozoite and merozoite proteins was detected, it is possible to identify some common bands above 35&#x2009;kDa. In the sporozoite, two specific distinct proteins below 25&#x2009;kDa are evident, while in the merozoite, a band closer to 10&#x2009;kDa is notoriously abundant. High molecular weight proteins seem shared among both asexual stages zoites but with some differences in concentration. The Western blot analysis with anti-sporozoite sera from rabbits (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2B</xref>) and birds (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2C</xref>) showed that both antisera recognized a similar polypeptide pattern in the sporozoite antigen, mainly polypeptides with molecular weight higher than 35&#x2009;kDa, among which a 40&#x2009;kDa protein is relevant. In the sporozoite, the most intense bands detected weighted 21&#x2009;kDa, 23&#x2009;kDa, and 24&#x2009;kDa. In contrast, in the 2nd generation merozoite antigen, the antisera from rabbits or chickens indistinctly detected only a few high molecular weight antigens (approximately 70&#x2009;kDa and 124&#x2009;kDa). The most relevant here is that each rabbit antiserum had to be proportionally diluted four times more than the bird antiserums in order to obtain the clearest image of the PVDF membrane, which indicates a superlative reactogenicity of these antibodies toward both antigens subject to evaluation.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Identification of sporozoite and merozoite antigens by rabbit and chicken anti-sporozoite sera. Sporozoite (Sz) and merozoite (Mz) proteins were separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue <bold>(A)</bold>. Western blot analysis with anti-sporozoite sera from two rabbits <bold>(B)</bold> and two birds <bold>(C)</bold>. The antisera were diluted 1/8000 in <bold>(B)</bold> and 1/2000 in <bold>(C)</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-10-1223436-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<title>Phage-display library screening with rabbit purified IgGs</title>
<p>In order to select recombinant Phage-display clones with specific affinity for rabbit anti-sporozoite antibodies, the IgG fraction was purified from the rabbit&#x2019;s antisera by affinity chromatography with protein G sepharose. We diluted the purified IgG fraction from 30&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/well to 0.23&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/well to test by indirect ELISA their reactivity against the sporozoite or the 2nd generation of the Mz antigens. <xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3</xref> shows greater reactivity to the Sz antigen compared to the Mz antigen.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Indirect ELISA titration of purified rabbit anti-sporozoite IgGs to sporozoite (Sz &#x25B2;) and second generation of merozoite (Mz &#x25B3;). A two-fold IgG dilution was evaluated starting from 30&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/well. Means in ODs (&#x00B1; SD) from duplicate wells are shown. Asterisks indicate statistical differences: &#x002A;<italic>p&#x2009;&#x003C;</italic> 0.05 (ANOVA, followed by Tukey post-hoc test).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-10-1223436-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Using this same purified IgG fraction three screening rounds were performed for the 12-mer and cyclic 7-mer phage-display libraries. <xref rid="tab1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref> shows the number of phage clones selected during each screening round. The selected phages of the 12-mer Ph.D. library increased from 2.0&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>5</sup> pfu in the first round to 6.9&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>6</sup> pfu in the third round. Similarly, phages obtained from the cyclic 7-mer Ph.D. library increased from 1.5&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>5</sup> pfu in the first round to 2.2&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>7</sup> pfu in the third round, indicating a selection of specific phage clones through the three screening rounds.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Enrichment of phage clone output in three screening rounds.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Ph.D. 12 mer (pfu/mL)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Ph.D. c7c (pfu/mL)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Coating antibody</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Eluted phage titer</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Increase in phage titer (fold)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Amplified phage titer</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Eluted phage titer</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Increase in phage titer (fold)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Amplified phage titer</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">1st Pannig (10&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/well)</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00D7;">2.0 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">1.0</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00D7;">3.0 &#x00D7; 10<sup>13</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00D7;">1.5 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">1.0</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00D7;">4.8&#x00D7;10<sup>13</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2nd Pannig (5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/well)</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00D7;">2.8 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">14.0</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00D7;">3.0 &#x00D7; 10<sup>12</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00D7;">3.3 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">2.2</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00D7;">5.0 &#x00D7; 10<sup>12</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">3rd Panning (2.5&#x2009;&#x03BC;g/well)</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00D7;">6.9 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">34.5</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00D7;">N.A.</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00D7;">2.2 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">146.7</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char="&#x00D7;">N.A.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>pfu plaque forming units; N.A. not amplified.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<title>Characterization of the phage-display selected clones</title>
<p>After the third screening round of each Phage-display random peptide libraries, 20 single phage clones were randomly selected and amplified. DNA sequencing was used to examine all of the selected clones. <xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Tables 2</xref>, <xref rid="tab3" ref-type="table">3</xref> provide the deduced amino acid sequences of the selected clones. DNA sequencing of the 12-mer Ph. D. library-selected phage clones revealed two immunodominant clones with the AGHTTQFNSKTT (7 times) and HFAYWWNGVRGP (8 times) peptide sequences. One clone with the amino acid sequence PNSAFWAGSER was obtained twice (<xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>). The clones selected from the cyclic 7-mer library were more diverse than those selected from the 12-mer library, four clones were selected twice, and one clone was selected three times (<xref rid="tab3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>). All selected clones matched with one or two main proteins of <italic>E. tenella</italic> previously quoted in the NCBI gen bank. Some of these proteins are crucial in adhesion and invasion events of the sporozoite to the enterocyte, however, most of them have been described as hypothetical proteins.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Peptide deduced aminoacid sequences on phage clones selected from 12 mer after three screening rounds.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">12-mer Phage selected clones</th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><xref rid="tfn1" ref-type="table-fn">&#x002A;</xref>AA sequence</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Identified protein, sequence ID, residues length and number of matches</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Position/protein coverage</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">LHRGNEAVYAWP</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hypothetical protein, conserved [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013228393.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013228393.1</ext-link> Length: 1103 Matches: 1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 553/6/7 (86%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2,7,8,12,14,18,20</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">AGHTTQFNSKTT</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cullin homog, putative [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013232647.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013232647.1</ext-link> Length: 208 Matches: 1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 54/6/7 (86%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">NRPDSAQFWLHH</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hypothetical protein, conserved [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013228556.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013228556.1</ext-link> Length: 9860 Matches: 3</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 1,326/7/9 (78%) Position 812/6/14 (43%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">11,17</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">GPNSAFWAGSER</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hypothetical protein, conserved [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013233745.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013233745.1</ext-link> Length: 1116 Matches: 3</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 76/6/7 (86%) Position 984/5/8 (63%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">FPVNNMQLWQVT</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hydroxymethyldihydropterin pyrophosphokinase-dihydropteroate synthase, putative [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013228556.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013228556.1</ext-link> Length: 9860 Matches: 3</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 262/8/11 (73%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">4,5,9,10,13,15,16,19</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">HFAYWWNGVRGP</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Dynein beta chain, flagellar outer arm, putative [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013232219.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013232219.1</ext-link> Length: 959 Matches: 1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 523/5/5 (100%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn1"><label>&#x002A;</label><p>Consensus amino acid residues are highlighted in bold letters. Position and protein coverage for AA sequence of every selected phage clone on NCBI standard protein BLAST protein&#x25BA;protein sequence of the <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> taxid 5,802.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Peptide deduced aminoacid sequences on phage clones selected cyclic 7 mer library after three screening rounds.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Cyclic 7-mer Phage selected clones</th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><xref rid="tfn2" ref-type="table-fn">&#x002A;</xref>AA sequence</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Identified protein, sequence ID, residues length and number of matches</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Position/protein coverage</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">1,5</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CNTGSPYEC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Microneme protein 4 [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://cac34726.2" ext-link-type="uri">CAC34726.2</ext-link> Length: 2340 Matches: 10</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 297, 991/5/8 (63%) Position 769, 810, 938, 124/6/9 (67%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CMSTGLSSC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Thrombospondin type 1 domain-containing protein, putative [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013235772.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013235772.1</ext-link> Length: 3774. Matches: 5</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 3,575/7/9 (78%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">7,15,20</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CSISSLTHC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hypothetical protein, conserved [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013233649.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013233649.1</ext-link> Length: 961. Matches: 3</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 412/7/8 (88%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">8</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CRSANIYTC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hypothetical protein, conserved [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013232311.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013232311.1</ext-link> Length: 1348. Matches: 1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 1,270/5/7 (71%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">9,16</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CHPVSGQKC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hypothetical protein ETH_00011430</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 208;/6/7(86%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">10,18</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><bold>CLK</bold>FWKPNC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hypothetical protein, conserved [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013228358.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013228358.1</ext-link> Length: 323 Matches: 1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 185/5/7(71%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">7&#x2032;</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><bold>CLKL</bold>GEKWC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hypothetical protein ETH_00039830 [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013231892.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013231892.1</ext-link> Length: 271 Matches: 1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 128/6/7 (86%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">10&#x2032;</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CA<bold>KL</bold>CLNNC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase, putative [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013227989.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013227989.1</ext-link> Length: 516 Matches: 1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 319/6/9 (67%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">11</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CHQTKTKFC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hypothetical protein ETH_00037435 [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013229950.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013229950.1</ext-link> Length: 251 Matches: 1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 137/6/6 (100%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CHNETQKMC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Dynein heavy chain 3, axonemal, related [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013232337.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013232337.1</ext-link> Length: 1111 Matches: 1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 462/6/9 (67%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">17</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CVGISALLC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Adenosine transporter, putative [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013231508.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013231508.1</ext-link> Length: 443 Matches: 1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 197/7/9 (78%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x2032;,3&#x2032;</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CPTNQHHLC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Regulator of chromosome condensation RCC1 (Precursor), related [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013236104.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013236104.1</ext-link> Length: 812 Matches: 1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 26/6/8 (75%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2&#x2032;</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CMNNFNITC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hypothetical protein, conserved [<italic>E. tenella</italic>] Sequence ID: <ext-link xlink:href="http://xp_013233414.1" ext-link-type="uri">XP_013233414.1</ext-link> Length: 1063 Matches: 1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Position 1/6/8 (75%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn2"><label>&#x002A;</label><p>Consensus amino acid residues are highlighted in bold letters. Position and protein coverage for AA sequence of every selected phage clone on NCBI standard protein BLAST protein&#x25BA;protein sequence of the <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> taxid 5,802.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<title>Genome sequence analysis of the phage-display selected clones</title>
<p>The <italic>E. tenella</italic> genome was BLAST screened with the sequence of every selected peptides. The peptides obtained from the 12 mer library found clear identities (<xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>). The AGHTTQFNSKTT peptide matched with a Cullin homolog. It was found that the HFAYWWNGVRGP peptide has an identity with the Dynein beta chain. The phage clone sequence GPNSAFWAGSER showed three matches with the Elongation Factor 2 (EF-2). The peptides obtained from the cyclic 7-mer library also found matches in the <italic>E. tenella</italic> genome (<xref rid="tab3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>). The CNTGSPYEC clone had ten matches with the extracellular domains of EtMIC4&#x2019;s epidermal growth factor-like repeats. Furthermore, the amino acid sequence of the phage clone CMSTGLSSC matched the thrombospondin type-I repeats of EtMIC4. In contrast, the CSISSLTHC clone showed several matches with a hypothetical protein conserved in <italic>E. tenella</italic>. Finally, as seen in <xref rid="tab3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>, at least three 7-mer peptides share the CLK and KL motifs; interestingly, two of these phage clones showed the highest reactivity in the ELISA test (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4C</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>ELISA of the reactogenicity of rabbit <bold>(A,C)</bold> and chicken <bold>(B,D)</bold> anti-sporozoite sera to selected phage clones from the 12-mer <bold>(A,B)</bold> and c7c mer <bold>(C,D)</bold> libraries. The selected phage clones were tested by ELISA with rabbit and chicken anti-sporozoite sera. The wild-type phage M13mp19, an irrelevant phage clone for each library (selected with rabbit antisera anti-Pseudorabies virus, 12&#x2009;m&#x2009;F.7 and c7c F.12), and PBS were used as negative controls. Reactivity of rabbit <bold>(A)</bold> and chicken antisera <bold>(B)</bold> against phage clones selected from the PhD 12-mer; rabbit antisera against selected clones from the c7c library <bold>(C)</bold>; and reactivity of the chicken antisera to selected clones from the c7c library <bold>(D)</bold> are shown. Bars represent mean ODs (&#x00B1; SD). NS, not significant. Asterisks indicate statistical differences: &#x002A;<italic>p&#x2009;&#x003C;</italic> 0.05 by ANOVA, applying the Tukey post-hoc test.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-10-1223436-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<title>Reactivity of the phage-display selected clones to anti-sporozoite rabbit and bird sera</title>
<p>The anti-sporozoite sera from rabbits and Leghorn chicks were used to test the recognizing level of every Phage clone selected from each Phage display random peptide libraries. <xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4</xref> shows the antigen reactivity of the selected Phage clones to rabbit and bird anti-sporozoite sera evaluated by indirect ELISA. Most of the selected phage clones interacted specifically with anti-sporozoite sera and had greater OD values than negative control sera (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4</xref>). Every Phage clone showed different level of reactogenicity toward anti-sporozoite sera. Although with some differences almost all Phage clones showed reactogenicity in the same order to both anti-sporozoite sera, it indicates that the sporozoite has immunodominant antigens recognized by both species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<title>Phage-display selected clones induce anti-sporozoite and anti-merozoite antibodies</title>
<p>If the peptide clones selected with the anti-sporozoite antibodies represent mimotopes present in <italic>E. tenella</italic> antigens, these phage clones will be able to induce antibodies against <italic>E. tenella</italic> antigens. In that sense, four Phage clones were selected and used to immunize one rabbit each. Every anti-clone rabbit serum was used to assess the recognition of the sporozoite and merozoite native antigens. These four Phage clones were selected for rabbit immunization based on their (i) ELISA reactivity to anti-sporozoite antibodies, (ii) frequency of clone selection, and (iii) bioinformatic similarity with <italic>E. tenella</italic> proteins. In this way, phage clones 1 and 7 of the Ph.D. c7c library, and phage clones 15 and 18 of the Ph.D. 12 mer library were selected for rabbit immunization (<xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>). <xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5</xref> shows the time course reactogenicity of the antiserum from every rabbit immunized with the selected phage clones to both asexual zoite stages of <italic>E. tenella</italic>. Although with different time course reactivity against every life cycle of <italic>E. tenella</italic> antigen, overall the rabbit anti-clone serums showed high titer recognizing both antigens tested, it was observed a time course light tendency to recognice more to Mz than Sz antigen, however at last of the immunization shedule the reactogenicity of every anti-clone serum agains both antigens was indistinghishable.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>ELISA reactivity of rabbit antiserum of selected clones to sporozoite and second generation of merozoite antigens. Rabbit anti-phage clones serum was diluted 1/10 and 1/100 and tested against sporozoite and merozoite antigens. The antiserum response from different phage clones is shown: <bold>(A)</bold> Phage clone 1, C-NTGSPYE-C; <bold>(B)</bold> Phage clone 7, C-SISSLTH-C; <bold>(C)</bold> Phage clone 15, HFAYWWNGVRGP and <bold>(D)</bold> Phage clone 18, AGHTTQFNSKTT. Figures represent mean ODs values with respective &#x00B1; SD. Different letters on the same date indicate statistical differences: &#x002A;<italic>p&#x2009;&#x003C;</italic> 0.05 (ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-10-1223436-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<title>Recognition of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> sporozoite and 2nd generation of merozoite antigens by anti-phage serums</title>
<p>The reactivity level and specific polypeptide recognition of every rabbit anti-phage serum to Sz and Mz antigens was investigated by Western blot. <xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref> shows the reactivity of the anti-phage 1 (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6C</xref>), anti-phage 7 (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6D</xref>), anti-phage 15 (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6E</xref>), and anti-phage 18 (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6F</xref>) serums. <xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6A</xref> shows both <italic>E. tenella</italic> asexual zoite stages protein profile and BSA resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. It was a control group for every PVDF membrane studied. <xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6B</xref> shows the reactivity of the antiserum pool from two rabbits immunized with wild-type M13 used as a negative control.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p>Identification of sporozoite and second generation of merozoite antigens by every rabbit anti-phage clone serum. Sporozoite (Sz), Merozoite (Mz), and Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) proteins were separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue <bold>(A)</bold>. Western blots are shown with wild-type M13 phage rabbit antisera used as negative control <bold>(B)</bold>; rabbit anti-phage clone 1 (C-NTGSPYE-C) serum <bold>(C)</bold>; rabbit anti-phage clone 7 (C-SISSLTH-C) serum <bold>(D)</bold>; rabbit anti-phage clone 15 (HFAYWWNGVRGP) serum <bold>(E)</bold>, and rabbit anti-phage clone 18 (AGHTTQFNSKTT) serum <bold>(F)</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fvets-10-1223436-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>All anti-phage serums notably recognized both Sz and Mz antigens (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref>). The anti-M13 negative control sera recognized bands of approximately 38&#x2009;kDa, 20&#x2009;kDa, and 13&#x2009;kDa in the Mz proteins and only a&#x2009;&#x2248;&#x2009;25&#x2013;27&#x2009;kDa range band in the Sz extract. These bands were also detected in all blots tested with all anti-phage serums (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref>). The anti-phage 1 serum detected prominent bands of 78&#x2009;kDa, 68&#x2009;kDa, 48&#x2009;kDa, and 40&#x2009;kDa in the Sz proteins (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6C</xref>, lane Sz). In addition, a pair of approximately 23 and &#x2248;25&#x2013;27&#x2009;kDa antigens (as was already seen with M13 antiserum) were recognized. Two bands of 68&#x2009;kDa and 60&#x2009;kDa were recognized in the Mz proteins; both share the same molecular weight with antigens detected in the sporozoites. A band of 40&#x2009;kDa was observed, which is also shared in the Sz antigens (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6A</xref>).</p>
<p>The phage clone 7 antiserum (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6D</xref>) detected at the Mz extract a pattern of bands closely similar to the anti-phage 1 serum. In contrast, very few bands were detected in the Sz proteins. A light band of 40&#x2009;kDa (also present in the Mz) and a band of &#x2248;25&#x2013;27&#x2009;kDa (present in the anti-M13 sera). The 40&#x2009;kDa antigen was detected in the Sz and Mz proteins by the anti-phage 1 and anti-phage 7 serums. Anti-phage 15 (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6E</xref>) and anti-phage 18 (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6F</xref>) serums detected a similar antigenic pattern in the Mz proteins and a pair of bands of approximately 68&#x2009;kDa and 70&#x2009;kDa. These bands were also detected in the Sz antigen. A specific band of 40&#x2009;kDa was detected in the Sz and Mz proteins with the anti-phage 18. This antiserum recognized a prominent band of 45&#x2009;kDa. This same antiserum also recognized bands of 34, 33, 27, 24, and 17&#x2009;kDa in the Sz extract (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6F</xref>, lane Sz). Although with different rank of reactivity and molecular mass, the four anti-phage clone serums recognized more bands in the Sz and Mz antigens than recognized by the sera from rabbits immunized with a wild-type M13 strain that was used as a negative control.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussions" id="sec23">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Several studies have shown that chickens become clinically resistant to artificial trickle infections with <italic>E. tenella</italic> oocysts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">37</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">39</xref>). When antisera of these chickens have been used to probe immunoblots on sporozoites and merozoites of <italic>E. tenella</italic>, a similar pattern of antigens has been identified on both asexual zoite stages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">38</xref>). We discovered that rabbits and hens inoculated subcutaneously with a vaccine of complete <italic>E. tenella</italic> sporozoites induce a humoral response that detects the same particular antigens in both asexual life-cycle phases of <italic>E. tenella</italic>. Our Western blot observation is consistent with previous studies, showing that antibodies generated against one asexual zoite stage cross-react with antigens from another asexual zoite stage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>).</p>
<p>Although rabbits and chickens responded equally to both <italic>Eimeria</italic> antigens, rabbit antisera showed a much greater antibody response to both antigens than antisera derived from SPF White Leghorn birds. Antiserum from a rabbit had to be diluted 1:8,000, whereas antiserum from a Leghorn chicken only had to be diluted 1/2,000. This has been done to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of the images of Western blot membranes. This is consistent with previous observations that sporozoites injected subcutaneously are more immunogenic than oocysts inoculated naturally (orally) to infected chickens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">40</xref>). Furthermore, it has been shown that heterologous hosts, such in this case the rabbits, recognize more critical epitopes of the sporozoites than those recognized by natural hosts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">40</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">42</xref>). In addition, it should be noted that the evolutionary distance between birds and rabbits permits the production of unique, specific antibodies against, for example, antigens of common pathogens in birds.</p>
<p>Pathogen-specific monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies can be employed in phage display combinatorial library screenings to find recombinant specific peptides of immunodominant epitopes with high affinity to these antibodies. Due to the scarcity of information on the nature of <italic>E. tenella</italic> protective antigens, we used rabbit anti-sporozoite antibodies as a probe in our study to discover key immunogenic epitopes that could be protective against <italic>E. tenella</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>). Indirect ELISA testing revealed that the majority of the 20 selected clones from each library strongly reacted to anti-sporozoite rabbit sera, showing that the selected recombinant peptide binds to a particular antibody against the <italic>E. tenella</italic> sporozoite. The DNA sequencing of the selected phage clones revealed that some phage clones were identical and had been selected many times. In the panning of random Phage-display libraries, the relative abundance of monospecific antibodies in a polyclonal mixture of an immune serum is expected to direct phage clone selection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>). The frequency of the selected recombinant peptides here suggests that these phagotopes are immunogenic and diverse. The peptides selected from the cyclic 7-mer library (suitable for selecting conformational epitope) were more varied than those obtained from the lineal 12-mer library.</p>
<p>Typically, many <italic>Eimeria</italic> antigens identified as vaccine candidates often play a role in host/parasitic interaction, most likely because these antigens are naturally exposed during parasite invasion/replication mechanisms and are thus accessible targets for the host immune response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">43</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">46</xref>). Proteins released from micronemes, organelles situated at the apical tip of apicomplexan parasites, whose contents are crucial for parasite gliding, motility, and adhesion to host cells, as well as entrance into infected cells, are among the most intensively studied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">49</xref>). In order to identify and determine the function of the target <italic>Eimeria</italic> antigens, Sasai et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">50</xref>) employed monoclonal antibodies (mab&#x2019;s) against recombinant EtMIC2 protein. These mabs first detected the micronemes of the sporozoite and merozoite of <italic>Eimeria</italic> sp. In another study, Witcombe et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>) demonstrated that the persistence of maternal protection in offspring chicks was connected with the reactivity of protective maternal (polyclonal) IgY antibodies with a high-weight molecular TRAP (thrombospondin-related anonymous protein)-family microneme protein termed EmTFP250.</p>
<p>The epidermal growth factor-like modules (EGF-like) and thrombospondin type 1 domain (TSP-1) motifs are found in high repetition in the EmTFP250, a feature also observed in other Apicomplexa parasites such as Plasmodium and Toxoplasma (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">49</xref>). EmTFP250 is related to <italic>E. tenella</italic> microneme protein 4 (EtMIC4) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">52</xref>), and it is believed that, as a protein complex together with EtMIC5, it plays a crucial function in host cell adhesion and invasion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">53</xref>). Moreover, EtMIC4, unlike the other <italic>E. tenella</italic> microneme proteins studied to date, appears to be present both on the sporozoite surface and within the micronemes in a constitutive manner (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">54</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">55</xref>). EtMIC4 contains adhesive domains conserved in higher eukaryotes, which include the EGF-like and the TSP-1 motifs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">52</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">54</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">55</xref>). Interestingly, the genomic screening of <italic>E. tenella</italic> NCBI-Blast with the Ph.D. c7c mer selected peptide sequences found multiple matches with the EGF-like and TSP-1 modules of EtMIC4. The results obtained in the present study suggest that the screening strategy of the Ph.D. c7c mer library increased the possibility of identifying conformational peptides with cysteine-restricted motifs, such as EGF-like and TSP-1 of EtMIC4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">54</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">55</xref>). These findings demonstrated that these peptides were immunodominants when the <italic>E. tenella</italic> intact sporozoites were inoculated as an immunogen in an animal different from a natural host (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">40</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">55</xref>).</p>
<p>Comparative analysis of the phagotope CSISSLTHC disclosed matches with a conserved hypothetical protein of <italic>E. tenella</italic>. Blake et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>) previously reported that at least 70% of <italic>E. tenella</italic> genes are currently classified as uncertain functions or are well characterized as conserved hypothetical proteins. Until recently, only a few genes of the conserved hypothetical proteins in <italic>Eimeria</italic> sp. have been examined and tested for function and immunogenicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>). A single-family of two 7mer peptides share the consensus motif C-LKLxxxN-C; both were selected in the same phage-display random panning (<xref rid="tab3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>), and the phage clone CAKLCLNNC showed the highest reactivity in the indirect ELISA, likely indicate that they are mimics of an immunodominant epitope of the <italic>E. tenella</italic> sporozoite.</p>
<p>The use of phage displays as a means of mapping epitopes in Apicomplexa could be an innovative strategy. However, the intricacy in the protein composition of every stage zoite of <italic>E. tenella</italic> makes mapping of epitopes represented by the mimotopes somewhat complicated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>). Further studies using random Phage display libraries involving heterologous antibodies against different life-cycle stages of <italic>E. tenella</italic> as ligands are required.</p>
<p>Liu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>) analyzed the proteome of second-generation merozoites using antisera from chickens previously infected with <italic>E. tenella</italic>. However, these antibodies only detected a small number of microneme and merozoite surface antigens in addition to other housekeeping proteins like enolasa, beta-tubulin, and heat shock protein 70. Recent research by Liu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">45</xref>) used antisera from <italic>E. tenella</italic>, <italic>E. acervulina</italic>, and <italic>E. maxima</italic> to perform a Western blot of two-dimensional gels containing sporozoite proteins from every <italic>Eimeria</italic> species. Fifty-four immunodominant proteins were identified in <italic>E. tenella</italic>, and 18 ortholog proteins were identified among the three <italic>Eimeria</italic> species. Five of the 18 ortholog proteins shared sequence similarity of more than 93% and were identified as common immunodominant antigens; these proteins included elongation factor 2 (EF-2), ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme domain-containing protein (UCE), 14&#x2013;3-3 protein, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and transhydrogenase.</p>
<p>Some of the <italic>E. tenella</italic> native protein sequences available in GenBank are similar to the deduced oligopeptide sequences of the phage clones selected from the Ph.D. 12 mer library; however, only two of them have been previously identified as immunodominant epitopes of the <italic>E. tenella</italic> sporozoites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">45</xref>). For example, the phagotope AGHTTQFNSKTT matched with cullin homolog putative protein of <italic>E. tenella</italic>, a protein that recruits particular targets to ubiquitin ligase in a multisubunit protein complex beneficial for ubiquitination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">45</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">56</xref>). This phagotope may be connected to UCE, a protein previously discovered as a common immunodominant antigen for <italic>Eimeria</italic> sp. by Liu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">45</xref>). Otherwise, the most reactive phagotope in the ELISA assay (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4A</xref>) matched with dynein beta chain, flagellar outer arm, a putative protein of <italic>E. tenella</italic>, which creates force toward the minus ends of the microtubules in the inner membrane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>), the latter protein is essential for <italic>Eimeria</italic> invasion of enterocytes, while the former protein has already been identified as an immunodominant peptide by Liu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>).</p>
<p>The phagotope GPNSAFWAGSER, which ranked second in indirect ELISA reactivity, matched with a putative protein that contain ankyrin-like repeats of <italic>E. tenella</italic>, in some Apicomplexa members this protein contributes to regulate the conoid stability, motility and cell invasion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">57</xref>). There is no prior evidence that these proteins are involved in coccidiosis protection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>). The phage clone GPNSAFWAGSER was also related to the putative <italic>E. tenella</italic> elongation factor-2 (EtEF-2) protein, which, according to Liu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">45</xref>), is a common immunodominant antigen in <italic>E. tenella</italic>, <italic>E. acervulina</italic>, and <italic>E. maxima</italic>.</p>
<p>While this particular phage clone had not previously been characterized and tested as a vaccine candidate, Panebra and Lillehoj (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">58</xref>) recently tested a recombinant vaccine platform with the same type of protein (EaET-1) in a priming/challenge trial, with promising results for cross-protective immunity against <italic>Eimeria</italic> sp. Lately, Liu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">46</xref>) described the elongation factor 1-&#x03B2;, putative, partial (EF-1 &#x03B2;), another protein from this group, as an immunodominant antigen common to sporozoites of <italic>E. acervulina</italic>, <italic>E. tenella</italic>, and <italic>E. necatrix</italic>. These findings support the vaccination potential of different elongation factor antigens for coccidiosis and open up new avenues for developing multivalent vaccines against <italic>Eimeria</italic> sp., which is crucial for the poultry industry.</p>
<p>In the search for immunodominant antigens, the selected peptide clones are expected to represent epitope mimics or mimotopes present in <italic>E. tenella</italic> antigens (reviewed in Adda et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>]). One way to corroborate this is to obtain antibodies against these peptides and then evaluate their immune reactogenicity to native <italic>E. tenella</italic> antigens. Our ELISA and Western blot data demonstrated that each rabbit anti-phage serum successfully detected specific antigens in the <italic>E. tenella</italic> sporozoite and 2nd generation of merozoite antigens. The latter supports the idea that the selected peptides correspond to true mimotopes, evidencing the immunogenic and protective potential of these phagotopes.</p>
<p>Interestingly, these mimotopes are presumably present in more than one life-cycle stage of <italic>E. tenella</italic>, indicating that either every mimotope is expressed by both parasite stages or the antiserum recognizes more than one mimotope paralogue. Antiserums from rabbits immunized with phagotope CNTGSPYEC or AGHTTQFNSKTT recognized more antigens in the sporozoite than in merozoite. All of these recognized antigens concatenate well with antigens initially identified by rabbit antibodies used to screen both Ph.D. libraries (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2B</xref>).</p>
<p>In the present study, the rabbit antiserums against both phagotopes recognized more than one antigen band, indicating that some proteins in the crude preparation of sporozoite and merozoite of <italic>E. tenella</italic> are under proteolytic activity like it would be doing <italic>in vivo</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>). Typically, micronemal and rhoptry proteins are often proteolytically cleaved during biogenesis and post-exocytosis to allow sporozoite cell identification and attachment to host cell membranes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>). Fragments generated from each <italic>E. tenella</italic> denaturized protein (Sz and Mz) could be keeping the same epitopes in scattered small pieces of different molecular weights. Each of these fragments could be maintaining these epitopes similarly as they were in the original quaternary structure of <italic>the E. tenella</italic> native protein, which would explain this multivalent recognition. Another possible explanation is that the anti-clone serum cross-reacts with the same specific antigen located in both life-cycle phases of <italic>E. tenella</italic>, and this antigenic determinant is in several polypeptides with different molecular mass. Further identification of biological targets in the intact <italic>E. tenella</italic> sporozoites and 2<sup>nd</sup> generation of merozoites with every anti-clone serum might be illuminating.</p>
<p>Our observations confirm that mimotopes can produce native antigen-specific antibodies in active vaccination programs against distinct pathogen targets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">29</xref>). Curiously, different anti-phage serums reacted to the same prominent band in the sporozoite, which had a molecular weight of approximately &#x2248;25&#x2013;27&#x2009;kDa (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref>). This antigenic band was also found in our immunostained membranes of Western blot probed with rabbit and chicken anti-sporozoite sera; however, this polypeptide was not observed in blottings of Sz and Mz antigens tested with antisera of chickens naturally (orally) immunized with <italic>E. tenella</italic> by Constantinoiu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>), despite this band (&#x2248;25&#x2013;27) was evident in their CBB stained gels. In the early 1990s, surface antigens like TA4, a 25-kDa polypeptide encompassing 17 and 8&#x2009;kDa, were identified (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>). TA4 was later identified as the sporozoite-specific glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored surface antigen (SAG)1, which can bind cultured epithelial cells and may play a role in parasite attachment to the enterocyte prior to invasion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">59</xref>). When used as a recombinant protein immunogen, DNA vaccine, or a <italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic>-vectored vaccine, SAG1 has been shown to induce partial protective immunity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">60</xref>). Previously, using two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry, de Venevelles et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">43</xref>) identified a sporozoite antigen TA4 precursor with a predicted molecular weight of 25.04&#x2009;kDa but an experimental molecular weight of 26.86&#x2009;kDa, which is more similar to the molecular mass of the band that we identified here. The latter helps us better understand the changes reported by several researchers throughout time regarding the specific molecular weight of this highly immunogenic peptide observed in our blots. In the meantime, further studies are being conducted to evaluate the immunogenicity of all these characterized phagotopes in priming/challenge trials.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec24">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Both phage display libraries used here successfully discovered novel candidates of B- cells antigens from <italic>E. tenella</italic>. This attractive reverse immunology approach leads to identifying high immunogenic <italic>E. tenella</italic> sporozoite mimotopes and their coding DNA sequence. The isolated clones revealed relatedness to dynein beta chain, flagellar outer arm putative, cullin homolog putative, elongation factor 2, microneme 4 protein of <italic>E. tenella</italic>, and a conserved hypothetical protein of <italic>E. tenella</italic>. The phagotopes were recognized by antisera from rabbits immunized with complete sporozoites of <italic>E. tenella</italic>, indicating their potential use as immunotopes.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec25">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec26">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal study was reviewed and approved by The FMVZ-UNAM&#x2019;s Institutional Review Board for Husbandry and Care in Animals (CICUA) examined and authorized the animal study through the Ph.D. internal board.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec27">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>MJ-E and RA-M: conceptualization, methodology, software, and writing original draft preparation. MJ-E, GT-I, DG, and AG-V: visualization and investigation. MJ-E, LL, and GT-I: data curation and statistical analysis. MJ-E, GT-I, and RA-M: funding acquisition, reviewing, and editing. GT-I and RA-M: supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec28">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The research was partly supported by funds provided by USDA-NIFA Sustainable Agriculture Systems, Grant No. 2019&#x2013;69012- 29905. Title of Project: Empowering United States Broiler Production for Transformation and Sustainability USDA-NIFA (Sustainable Agriculture Systems): No. 2019&#x2013;69012-29905. This work was supported by the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM)&#x2013;Technological Innovation, Research Projects Support Program (PAPIIT). Project Number: IN217022 &#x201C;Alternative Strategies for Prophylaxis of Avian Coccidiosis in M&#x00E9;xico&#x201D;.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec29">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec37" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>We would like acknowledge to Pablo Pintor-R&#x00ED;os and Jaime E. Cordova L&#x00F3;pez for their invaluable technical assistance.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ogedengbe</surname> <given-names>ME</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Sherry</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ogedengbe</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chapman</surname> <given-names>HD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barta</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phylogenies based on combined mitochondrial and nuclear sequences conflict with morphologically defined genera in the eimeriid coccidia (Apicomplexa)</article-title>. <source>Int J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>48</volume>:<fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>69</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.07.008</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28989067</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knox</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dehaeck</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huntington</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rathinam</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ravipati</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Re-calculating the cost of coccidiosis in chickens</article-title>. <source>Vet Res</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>51</volume>:<fpage>115</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13567-020-00837-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32928271</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Constantinoiu</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Molloy</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jorgensen</surname> <given-names>WK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coleman</surname> <given-names>GT</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Development and validation of an ELISA for detecting antibodies to <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> in chickens</article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>150</volume>:<fpage>306</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.09.019</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17976915</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dalloul</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lillehoj</surname> <given-names>HS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Poultry coccidiosis: recent advancements in control measures and vaccine development</article-title>. <source>Expert Rev Vaccines</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1586/14760584.5.1.143</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16451116</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Eimeria</italic> genomics: where are we now and where are we going?</article-title> <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>212</volume>:<fpage>68</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.05.007</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25986325</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pastor-Fern&#x00E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nolan</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomley</surname> <given-names>FM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Recombinant anticoccidial vaccines&#x2013;a cup half full?</article-title> <source>Infect Gen Evol</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>55</volume>:<fpage>358</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>65</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.meegid.2017.10.009</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29017798</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Venkatas</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adeleke</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A review of <italic>Eimeria</italic> antigen identification for the development of novel anticoccidial vaccines</article-title>. <source>Parasitol Res</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>118</volume>:<fpage>1701</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00436-019-06338-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31065831</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>An</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Protection of hatchlings against coccidiosis by maternal antibodies to four recombinant proteins of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic>, <italic>Eimeria acervulina</italic> and <italic>Eimeria maxima</italic></article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>312</volume>:<fpage>109813</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2022.109813</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kr&#x00FC;cken</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hosse</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mouafo</surname> <given-names>AN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Entzeroth</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bierbaun</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marinovski</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Excystation of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> sporozoites impaired by antibody recognizing gametocyte oocyst antigens GAM22 and GAM 56</article-title>. <source>Eukaryot Cell</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>202</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/EC.00292-07</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Danforth</surname> <given-names>HD</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAndrew</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Hybridoma antibody characterization of stage-specific and stage-cross reactive antigens of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic></article-title>. <source>J Parasitol</source>. (<year>1987</year>) <volume>73</volume>:<fpage>985</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/3282522</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2443634</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wiedmer</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alnassan</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Volke</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thabet</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daugschies</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lendner</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Passive immunization with <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> gametocyte antigen 56 (EtGam56) specific antibodies and active immunization trial with the epitope containing peptide</article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>247</volume>:<fpage>100</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.09.019</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29080755</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ju&#x00E1;rez-Estrada</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tellez-Isaias</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x00E1;nchez-Godoy</surname> <given-names>FD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alonso-Morales</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Immunotherapy with egg yolk <italic>Eimeria</italic> sp.-specific immunoglobulins in SPF Leghorn chicks elicits successful protection against <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>Front Vet Sci</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>758379</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2021.758379</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34859090</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wallach</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Role of antibody in immunity and control of chicken coccidiosis</article-title>. <source>Trends Parasitol</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>26</volume>:<fpage>382</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pt.2010.04.004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20452286</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jahn</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matros</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bakulina</surname> <given-names>AY</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tiedemann</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shubert</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Giersberg</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Model structure of the immunodominant surface antigen of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> identified as a target for sporozoite neutralizing monoclonal antibody</article-title>. <source>Parasitol Res</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>105</volume>:<fpage>655</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.peptides.2009.09.019</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19387686</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhai</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Molecular characterization and immune protection of a new conserved hypothetical protein of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic></article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>e0157678</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0157678</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27309852</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burrell</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomley</surname> <given-names>FM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vaughan</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marugan-Hernandez</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Life cycle stages, specific organelles and invasion mechanisms of <italic>Eimeria</italic> species</article-title>. <source>Parasitology</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>147</volume>:<fpage>263</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>78</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0031182019001562</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31727204</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adda</surname> <given-names>CG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andeers</surname> <given-names>RF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tilley</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Foley</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Random sequence libraries displayed on phage: identification of biologically important molecules</article-title>. <source>Comb Chem High Throughput Screen</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2174/1386207023330561</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11860335</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ellis</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Newlands</surname> <given-names>GFJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nisbet</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matthews</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phage-display library biopanning as a novel approach to identifying nematode vaccine antigens</article-title>. <source>Parasite Immunol</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>34</volume>:<fpage>285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>95</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3024.2011.01317.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21770973</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gazarian</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gazarian</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x00E1;nchez</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alonso</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Immunogenic peptides from phage display libraries with potential of protecting mice against the pseudorabies virus</article-title>. <source>Vet Microbiol</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>154</volume>:<fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.06.020</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21764227</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hern&#x00E1;ndez-Chi&#x00F1;as</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gazarian</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gazarian</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mendoza-Hern&#x00E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xicohtencatl-Cortes</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eslava</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Peptide sequences identified by phage display are immunodominant functional motifs of pet and pic serine proteases secreted by Escherichia coli and <italic>Shigella flexneri</italic></article-title>. <source>Peptides</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>2127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.peptides.2009.09.019</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19772881</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prudencio</surname> <given-names>CR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marra</surname> <given-names>AOM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cardozo</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goulart</surname> <given-names>LR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Recombinant peptides as new immunogens for the control of the bovine tick, <italic>Rhipicephalus</italic> (Boophilus) <italic>microplus</italic></article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>172</volume>:<fpage>122</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.04.012</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20488622</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Denisova</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Denisov</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Evelegh</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weissgram</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beck</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Foley</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Characterizing complex polysera produced by antigen-specific immunization through the use of affinity-selected mimotopes</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>e5309</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0005309</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19390580</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pande</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Szewczyk</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ashok</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grover</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phage display: concept, innovations, applications and future</article-title>. <source>Biotech Adv</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<fpage>849</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.07.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abi-Ghanem</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waghela</surname> <given-names>SD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caldwell</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Danforth</surname> <given-names>HD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berghman</surname> <given-names>LR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phage display selection and characterization of single-chain recombinant antibodies against <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> sporozoites</article-title>. <source>Vet Immunol Immunopathol</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>121</volume>:<fpage>58</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.08.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amer</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Construction, screening and identification of a phage display antibody library against the <italic>Eimeria acervulina</italic> merozoite</article-title>. <source>Biochem Biophys Res Commun</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>393</volume>:<fpage>703</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.02.063</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20170639</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ko</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>CK</given-names> <suffix>2nd</suffix></name> <name><surname>McDonel</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Identification and characterization of a target antigen of a monoclonal antibody directed against <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> merozoites</article-title>. <source>J Mol Bioch Parasitol</source>. (<year>1990</year>) <volume>41</volume>:<fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0166-6851(90)90096-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deitsch</surname> <given-names>KW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lukehart</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stringer</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Common strategies for antigenic variation by bacterial, fungal and protozoan pathogens</article-title>. <source>Nat Rev Microbiol</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>493</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>503</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro2145</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19503065</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><label>28.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>DosReis</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Evasion of immune responses by <italic>Trypanosoma cruzi</italic>, the etiological agent of Chagas disease</article-title>. <source>Braz J Med Biolog Res</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>44</volume>:<fpage>84</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/s0100-879x2011007500005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21243314</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><label>29.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>LE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goulart</surname> <given-names>LR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>NC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lima</surname> <given-names>MI</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martins</surname> <given-names>VT</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Mimotope-based vaccines of <italic>Leishmania infantum</italic> antigens and their protective efficacy against visceral leishmaniasis</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>e110014</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0110014</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25333662</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><label>30.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stephan</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rommel</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daugshies</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haberkorn</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Studies of resistance to anticoccidials in <italic>Eimeria</italic> field isolates and pure <italic>Eimeria</italic> strains</article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>1997</year>) <volume>69</volume>:<fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0304-4017(96)01096-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9187026</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><label>31.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tomley</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Techniques for isolation and characterization of apical organelles from <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> sporozoites</article-title>. <source>Methods</source>. (<year>1997</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>171</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/meth.1997.0509</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><label>32.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dulski</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The purification of sporocysts and sporozoites from <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> oocysts using percoll density gradients</article-title>. <source>Avian Dis</source>. (<year>1988</year>) <volume>32</volume>:<fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1590810</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2840881</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><label>33.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Immunoproteomic analysis of the second generation merozoite proteins of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic></article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>164</volume>:<fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.05.016</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19581052</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><label>34.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Geysen</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ausma</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van den Bossche</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Simultaneous purification of merozoites and schizonts of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> (Apicomplexa) by percoll flotation and assessment of cell viability with a double fluorescent dye assay</article-title>. <source>J Parasitol</source>. (<year>1991</year>) <volume>77</volume>:<fpage>989</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/3282754</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1779304</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><label>35.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ju&#x00E1;rez-Estrada</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gayosso-V&#x00E1;zquez</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tellez-Isaias</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alonso-Morales</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Protective immunity induced by an <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> whole sporozoite vaccine elicits specific B-cell antigens</article-title>. <source>Animals</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>1344</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11051344</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34065041</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><label>36.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Constantinoiu</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Molloy</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jorgensen</surname> <given-names>WK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coleman</surname> <given-names>GT</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Antibody response against endogenous stages of an attenuated strain of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic></article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>154</volume>:<fpage>193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>204</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.03.029</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18495349</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><label>37.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>PL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>McKenzie</surname> <given-names>ME</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perry</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crane</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murray</surname> <given-names>PK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Immunization of young broiler chickens with low level infections of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic>, <italic>E. acervulina</italic>, or <italic>E. maxima</italic></article-title>. <source>Avian Pathol</source>. (<year>1986</year>) <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>271</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/03079458608436287</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18766526</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><label>38.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Constantinoiu</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Molloy</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jorgensen</surname> <given-names>WK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coleman</surname> <given-names>GT</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Characterization of the antibody response in birds following infection with wild-type and attenuated strains of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> and <italic>Eimeria necatrix</italic></article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>175</volume>:<fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.09.025</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21035267</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><label>39.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soutter</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Werling</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomley</surname> <given-names>FM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Poultry coccidiosis: design and interpretation of vaccine studies</article-title>. <source>Front Vet Sci</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>101</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2020.00101</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32175341</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><label>40.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Talebi</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Inhibition of <italic>Eimeria acervulina</italic> sporozoite invasion by rabbit and chicken antisera using ISI assay</article-title>. <source>Arch Razi Inst</source>. (<year>2001</year>) <volume>52</volume>:<fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><label>41.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Talebi</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mulcahy</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>High-resolution mapping of B-cell epitopes within an antigenic sequence from <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic></article-title>. <source>Infect Immun</source>. (<year>1994</year>) <volume>62</volume>:<fpage>4202</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/iai.62.10.4202-4207.1994</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7523292</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><label>42.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Talebi</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mulcahy</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Cross-reactivity among antisera raised against five avian <italic>Eimeria</italic> species in the natural host and in rabbits</article-title>. <source>Avian Pathol</source>. (<year>1995</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>533</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/03079459508419092</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><label>43.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Venevelles</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chich</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Faigle</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Loew</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Labb&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Girard-Misguich</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Towards a reference map of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> sporozoite proteins by two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry</article-title>. <source>Int J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>34</volume>:<fpage>1321</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.08.002</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15542092</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><label>44.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Besteiro</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dubremetz</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lebrun</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The moving junction of apicomplexan parasites: a key structure for invasion</article-title>. <source>Cell Microbiol</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>797</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>805</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01597.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><label>45.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Identification of common immunodominant antigens of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic>, <italic>Eimeria acervulina</italic> and <italic>Eimeria maxima</italic> by immunoproteomic analysis</article-title>. <source>Oncotarget</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>34935</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18632/oncotarget.16824</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28432276</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><label>46.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tuo</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Immunoproteomic and mass spectrometric analysis of <italic>Eimeria acervulina</italic> antigens recognized by antisera from chickens infected with <italic>E. acervulina</italic>, <italic>E. tenella</italic> or <italic>E. necatrix</italic></article-title>. <source>Parasit Vectors</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>93</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13071-020-3965-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><label>47.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dowse</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soldati</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Host cell invasion by the apicomplexans: the significance of microneme protein proteolysis</article-title>. <source>Curr Op in Microb</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>388</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>96</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mib.2004.06.013</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15358257</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><label>48.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lamarque</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Besteiro</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Papoin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roques</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vulliez-Le Normand</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morlon-Guyot</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>The RON2-AMA1 interaction is a critical step in moving junction-dependent invasion by apicomplexan parasites</article-title>. <source>PLoS Pathog</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>e1001276</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1001276</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21347343</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><label>49.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morahan</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wamg</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coppel</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>No TRAP, no invasion</article-title>. <source>Trends Parasitol</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>25</volume>:<fpage>77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>84</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pt.2008.11.004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19101208</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><label>50.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sasai</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fetterer</surname> <given-names>RH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lillehoj</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matsuura</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Constantinoiu</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matsubayashi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Characterization of monoclonal antibodies that recognize the <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> microneme protein MIC2</article-title>. <source>J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>94</volume>:<fpage>1432</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1645/GE-1558.1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18576850</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><label>51.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Witcombe</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>DJP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Belli</surname> <given-names>SI</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallach</surname> <given-names>MG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>NC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Eimeria maxima</italic> TRAP family protein EmTFP250: subcellular localisation and induction of immune responses by immunization with a recombinant C-terminal derivative</article-title>. <source>Int J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>34</volume>:<fpage>861</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>72</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.03.006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15157769</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><label>52.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Periz</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomley</surname> <given-names>FM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> microneme protein EtMIC4: capture of the full-length transcribed sequence and comparison with other microneme proteins</article-title>. <source>Parasitol Res</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>104</volume>:<fpage>717</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00436-008-1301-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19089451</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><label>53.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Periz</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gill</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hunt</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomley</surname> <given-names>FM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The microneme proteins EtMIC4 and EtMIC5 of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> form a novel, ultra-high molecular mass protein complex that binds target host cells</article-title>. <source>J Biol Chem</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>282</volume>:<fpage>16891</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M702407200</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><label>54.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tomley</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Billington</surname> <given-names>KJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bumstead</surname> <given-names>JN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clark</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Monaghan</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>EtMIC4: a microneme protein from <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> that contains tandem arrays of epidermal growth factor-like repeats and thrombospondin type-I repeats</article-title>. <source>Int J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2001</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>1303</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0020-7519(01)00255-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11566298</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><label>55.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>R&#x00E9;fega</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Misguich</surname> <given-names>FG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bourdieu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>P&#x00E9;ry</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Labb&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Gene discovery in <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> by immunoscreening cDNA expression libraries of sporozoites and schizonts with chicken intestinal antibodies</article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2003</year>) <volume>113</volume>:<fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0304-4017(03)00033-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12651215</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><label>56.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>KL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chong</surname> <given-names>SP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>ST</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shirley</surname> <given-names>MN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomley</surname> <given-names>FM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jangi</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A survey of genes in <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> merozoites by EST sequencing</article-title>. <source>Int J Pasitol</source>. (<year>1999</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>1885</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0020-7519(99)00160-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10961844</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><label>57.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anthony</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drewry</surname> <given-names>LL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sibley</surname> <given-names>LD</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A conserved ankyrin repeat-containing protein regulates conoid stability, motility and cell invasion in <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic></article-title>. <source>Nat Commun</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>2236</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-017-02341-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29269729</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><label>58.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Panebra</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lillehoj</surname> <given-names>HS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title><italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> elongation factor-1&#x03B1; (EF-1&#x03B1;) coadministered with chicken IL-7 (chIL-7) DNA vaccine emulsified in Montanide gel 01 adjuvant enhanced the immune response to <italic>E. acervulina</italic> infection in broiler chickens</article-title>. <source>Avian Dis</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>63</volume>:<fpage>342</fpage>:&#x2013;<lpage>350</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1637/11976-092418-Reg.1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><label>59.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ansari</surname> <given-names>HR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Billington</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Browne</surname> <given-names>HP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bryant</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Genomic analysis of the causative agents of coccidiosis in domestic chickens</article-title>. <source>Genome Res</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>1676</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>85</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.168955.113</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25015382</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><label>60.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zimmermann</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saalbach</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jahn</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Giersberg</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haehnel</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wedel</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Antibody expressing pea seeds as fodder for prevention of gastrointestinal parasitic infections in chickens</article-title>. <source>BMC Biotechnol</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>79</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1472-6750-9-79</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19747368</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn0003"><p><sup>1</sup><ext-link xlink:href="https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi" ext-link-type="uri">https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>
