Front. Vet. Sci.Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceFront. Vet. Sci.2297-1769Frontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fvets.2020.581766Veterinary ScienceCorrectionCorrigendum: Evolution of the ASF Infection Stage in Wild Boar Within the EU (2014–2018)Martínez-AvilésMarta*IglesiasIreneDe La TorreAnaCentro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA), INIA, Valdeolmos, Spain
Edited and reviewed by: Andrew William Byrne, Department of Agriculture Food and the Marine, Ireland
*Correspondence: Marta Martínez-Avilés marta.sanidadanimal.info@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
A Corrigendum on Evolution of the ASF Infection Stage in Wild Boar Within the EU (2014–2018) by Martínez-Avilés, M., Iglesias, I., and De La Torre, A. (2020). Front. Vet. Sci. 7:155. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00155antibodiesepidemiologysurveillancemoderately virulent virussurvivorAfrican Swine feverwild boar
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. In the third column of the table, first row, under Stage 2 it should be stated in brackets (PCR+, AB+)b. The corrected Table 1 appears below.
Annual distribution of ASF notifications in wild boar by diagnostic test/s used and estimated stage of infection.
Year
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
(PCR+, AB-)a
(PCR+, AB+)b
(PCR–, AB+)c
2014
243
19
2
2015
1,284
70
285
2016
1,596
122
582
2017
2,813
127
713
2018
3,946
55
804
Total
9,882
393
2,336
Includes combinations with ELISA– or not specified, and IPT– or not specified.
Includes the combinations ELISA+and IPT+, –, or not specified, and ELISA– or not specified but IPT+.
Includes the combinations PCR– or not specified, ELISA+ and IPT+, –, or not specified, and PCR– or not specified, ELISA– or not specified and IPT+.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.