<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Sustain. Food Syst.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Sustain. Food Syst.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2571-581X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsufs.2025.1733151</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effect of drying temperature on berry press residue anthocyanin stability and profile</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gricenko</surname>
<given-names>Taisija</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3313262"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zommere</surname>
<given-names>Alise</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3257108"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kviesis</surname>
<given-names>Jorens</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Klavins</surname>
<given-names>Linards</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1914898"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Environmental Science, National Centre of Forest and Water Research, University of Latvia</institution>, <city>Riga</city>, <country country="lv">Latvia</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>&#x002A;</label>Correspondence: Linards Klavins, <email xlink:href="mailto:linards.klavins@lu.lv">linards.klavins@lu.lv</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-01-13">
<day>13</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>1733151</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>27</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>22</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>31</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2026 Gricenko, Zommere, Kviesis and Klavins.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Gricenko, Zommere, Kviesis and Klavins</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-01-13">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Berry press residues represent a valuable source of bioactive compounds, particularly anthocyanins and polyphenols, which exhibit strong antioxidant properties. Berry press residues have wide application potential in food systems due to their health benefits as well as colouring capabilities. However, the effects of drying on anthocyanin stability are not fully understood across berry species and drying methods. This study evaluated the effects of conventional hot air and vacuum drying at temperatures ranging from 30 to 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, as well as freeze drying, on the total polyphenolic content (TPC), total anthocyanin content (TAC), antioxidant activity (DPPH assay), and individual anthocyanin profiles in press residues from 10 berry species. Freeze drying preserved the highest levels of both TPC and TAC, while vacuum drying at moderate temperatures (30&#x2013;60&#x202F;&#x00B0;C) demonstrated comparable stability and outperformed conventional drying. All thermal methods showed accelerated degradation of anthocyanins above 75&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, with notable compound losses at 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C. Species-specific responses were observed, with chokeberries and honeysuckle berries being particularly susceptible to high-temperature degradation. Chromatographic analysis revealed that rutinoside and glucoside anthocyanins were more thermally stable than sambubioside and diglucoside forms. Strong correlations were found between TPC and antioxidant activity (r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.89), whereas the contribution of anthocyanin was more variable (r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.66). This study provided a systematic cross-species comparison of 10 berry press residues dried under identical conditions, revealing species-specific degradation thresholds and demonstrating vacuum drying as a method for the substitution of freeze drying. Clear structure-stability relations across 24 individual anthocyanins were demonstrated, offering novel mechanistic insights for optimisation of industrial anthocyanin-rich by-product valorisation. Future research should explore the molecular mechanisms underlying anthocyanin degradation and assess process scalability for industrial applications. Optimising drying protocols may enable sustainable upcycling of berry by-products into high-value functional ingredients.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>anthocyanin stability</kwd>
<kwd>berry press residues</kwd>
<kwd>drying techniques</kwd>
<kwd>food waste valorisation</kwd>
<kwd>polyphenols</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by the Latvian Council of Science project &#x201C;Biorefinery-derived Functional Ingredients for Enhanced Conjugate Stability of Natural Dyes through Co-pigmentation &#x2013; ChromaQuest&#x201D; (project no. lzp-2024/1-0066).</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="2"/>
<ref-count count="36"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="9004"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Sustainable Food Processing</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Berry press residues are a by-product of juice processing, consisting of seeds, residual pulp, and berry skins. Despite their high nutritional value, which includes dietary fibre, vitamins, and antioxidants, they are an underutilised food industry by-product with potential innovative applications in nutrition and can also contribute to sustainable practice promotion within the food industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Diez-S&#x00E1;nchez et al., 2023</xref>). Consumption of berry residues has been associated with the reduction of lifestyle-related diseases, for example, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, while the high fibre contents can improve gut health by promoting beneficial gut microbiota (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Calabuig-Jim&#x00E9;nez et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Huang et al., 2025</xref>). Utilisation of berry press residues also reduces amounts of produced waste; the overall environmental impacts associated with fruit and berry processing contribute to sustainability in food production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Agraso-Otero et al., 2025</xref>). Through valorisation of berry processing waste, we can create value-added products for incorporation into functional foods or nutraceuticals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Stanca et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). An important aspect associated with berry press residue-derived products is the acceptance and consumer perception of products that are created from food industry side-streams &#x2013; behavioural changes can be considered as the main drivers of food innovation uptake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">P&#x00E9;rez-Marroqu&#x00ED;n et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Hellali and Kora&#x00EF;, 2023</xref>). Berry press residue stability and shelf-life can be significantly increased when the biomass is dried, thus optimal drying methods can ensure that the health-beneficial compounds like anthocyanins and polyphenolics are retained in the product. Preserving these compound groups during drying can enhance the overall value of the ingredients by maintaining their antioxidant properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Enaru et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Cheng et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>The impact of drying methods on the anthocyanin and polyphenolic contents is a relatively well researched area &#x2013; previous studies have investigated the effects of freeze-drying (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Donno et al., 2025</xref>), conventional drying (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Gr&#x00E1;ndez-Yoplac et al., 2021</xref>), infrared drying (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Barba et al., 2022</xref>), microwave-assisted drying (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Zhang et al., 2023</xref>), and far infrared drying (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Liu et al., 2022</xref>) on various materials (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Pedisi&#x0107; et al., 2025</xref>). While many studies focus on individual drying methods, comprehensive, comparative studies that evaluate and compare several methods under the same conditions are lacking. There is limited data on specific degradation rates or characteristics of individual anthocyanins during the drying process, which is an important aspect when optimising the drying process to preserve foods or food by-products rich in these compounds. Also, most studies investigating the drying effect on berry press residues focus on a limited number of species, for example, chokeberry, bilberry, and blueberry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Zhang et al., 2023</xref>), which leaves a gap with respect to other types of biomass rich in anthocyanins and polyphenolics. Understanding anthocyanin degradation in berry press residues is an important aspect in the optimisation of their application in the food industry, food waste valorisation, and improvement of the nutritional value of this type of biomass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Chen et al., 2022</xref>). The comprehension of how different drying methods and temperatures affect anthocyanin stability can enhance the extraction efficiency and support the development of high added value ingredients for food production, for example, preservatives or food colourants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Tena and Asuero, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Nemetz et al., 2021</xref>). Valorisation of berry by-products through anthocyanin recovery reduces the environmental impact and generates economic benefits for the food industry by offsetting the carbon footprint (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Diaconeasa et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of different drying techniques and temperatures, as well as their impact and the content of anthocyanins and total polyphenols in a variety of commonly produced berry press residues. The degradation of individual anthocyanins due to temperature, in the presence or absence of oxygen (vacuum drying), has been evaluated to determine specific degradation patterns across the studied berry species.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Chemicals</title>
<p>The reagents used in the study were kuromanin chloride, &#x2265; 96.0% purity (<italic>Extrasynthese</italic>, France), formic acid, &#x2265; 98.0% purity (<italic>Sigma-Aldrich</italic>, United States), potassium chloride, 99.0&#x2013;100.5% purity (<italic>Sigma-Aldrich</italic>, United States), sodium acetate, &#x2265; 99.0% purity (<italic>Sigma-Aldrich</italic>, United States), ethanol, &#x2265; 96.0% purity (<italic>Sigma-Aldrich</italic>, United States), methanol, &#x2265; 99.0% purity (<italic>Sigma-Aldrich</italic>, United States), 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), &#x2265; 97.0% purity (<italic>Sigma-Aldrich</italic>, United States), L-ascorbic acid, 99.7&#x2013;100.5% purity (<italic>Merck KGaA</italic>, Germany), isopropyl alcohol, &#x2265; 99.5% purity (<italic>Honeywell</italic>, United States), Folin&#x2013;Ciocalteu reagent, 2&#x202F;M (<italic>Sigma-Aldrich</italic>, United States), sodium carbonate, &#x2265; 98% purity (<italic>Sigma-Aldrich</italic>, United States), gallic acid, &#x2265; 99.0% purity (<italic>Sigma-Aldrich</italic>, United States), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), (<italic>Sigma-Aldrich</italic>, United States), hydrochloric acid, &#x2265; 37.0% purity (<italic>Sigma-Aldrich</italic>, United States), phosphoric acid, &#x2265; 85.0% purity (<italic>Chem-Lab</italic>, Belgium).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Plant material</title>
<p>Black chokeberry (<italic>Aronia melanocarpa</italic> (Michx.) Elliott), highbush blueberry (<italic>Vaccinium corymbosum</italic> L.), bilberry (<italic>Vaccinium myrtillus</italic> L.), honeysuckle berry (<italic>Lonicera caerulea</italic> L.), elderberry (<italic>Sambucus nigra</italic> L.), black currant (<italic>Ribes nigrum</italic> L.), red currant (<italic>Ribes rubrum</italic> L.), bog cranberry (<italic>Vaccinium oxycoccos</italic> L.), strawberry (<italic>Fragaria &#x00D7; ananassa</italic> Duchesne ex Rozier), and raspberry (<italic>Rubus idaeus</italic> L.) pomaces were provided by the local juice producer LLC &#x201C;Very Berry&#x201D; (D&#x0101;rzciems, Gaujiena parish, Smiltene county, Latvia) in February 2025. Berry press residues were stored in polyethylene bags at &#x2212;20&#x202F;&#x00B0;C.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Sample preparation</title>
<sec id="sec6">
<title>Conventional drying</title>
<p>Approximately 15&#x202F;g of each berry press residue sample was spread in an even layer on a Petri dish and dried in a conventional dryer (<italic>Gallenkamp</italic>, United Kingdom) at five different temperatures: 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, 45&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, 60&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, 75&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, and 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C for 24&#x202F;h.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>Vacuum drying</title>
<p>Approximately 15&#x202F;g of each berry press residue sample was spread in an even layer on a Petri dish and dried in a vacuum dryer (<italic>Memmert VO</italic>, Germany) at five different temperatures: 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, 45&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, 60&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, 75&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, and 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, under 20 mBar pressure for 24&#x202F;h.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<title>Freeze drying</title>
<p>Approximately 50&#x202F;g of each berry press residue sample was spread in an even layer on a Petri dish and dried in a freeze-dryer (<italic>BenchTop Pro SP Scientific</italic>, England) for 72&#x202F;h, with the condenser temperature set at &#x2212;55&#x202F;&#x00B0;C under 50 mTorr pressure.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>Homogenisation of berry press residue samples</title>
<p>After drying, each sample was cooled to room temperature. Samples were homogenised using a CM 102 grinder (<italic>GRAEF</italic>, Germany) by pulsing for 20&#x202F;s, then transferred to a polyethylene bag and stored at &#x2212;20&#x202F;&#x00B0;C until further use.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>Ultrasound-assisted extraction of berry press residue samples</title>
<p>Extraction of anthocyanins and polyphenolics was done according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Klavins et al. (2018)</xref> with modifications. Depending on the expected anthocyanin content in the sample, 2&#x2013;5&#x202F;g of each berry press residue powder was weighed into a 100&#x202F;mL glass bottle and extracted for 15&#x202F;min at room temperature with 50&#x202F;mL of 70% acidified ethanol solution (0.5% formic acid) using a 60&#x202F;W ultrasonic bath Sonorex DIGIPLUS DL (<italic>Bandelin</italic>, Germany). The solid to liquid ratio was set so that it did not exceed 1:10 to ensure complete extraction. The water in the ultrasound bath was exchanged between each set of samples to ensure that the water does not exceed 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C. After extraction, the samples were filtered through a Whatman 11 filter paper into 50&#x202F;mL polypropylene tubes and stored at &#x2212;20&#x202F;&#x00B0;C until further analysis. All concentrations were calculated on a dry sample basis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>Spectrophotometric analyses</title>
<sec id="sec12">
<title>Measurement of total anthocyanins by the pH differential method</title>
<p>Total anthocyanin content (TAC) in the berry press residues was determined using the pH differential method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Lee et al., 2005</xref>). Potassium chloride buffer solution (0.025&#x202F;M, pH 1.0) and sodium acetate buffer solution (0.4&#x202F;M, pH 4.5) were prepared, and the pH of each solution was adjusted using concentrated (11.65&#x202F;M) hydrochloric acid.</p>
<p>Samples were filtered through 0.45&#x202F;&#x03BC;m membrane filters before analysis. In a 96-well plate, 5&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of the filtered dark berry press residue extracts (blackcurrant, honeysuckle berry, bilberry, elderberry, chokeberry, blueberry, and blank) or 50&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of the filtered light berry press residue extracts (raspberry, strawberry, cranberry, red currant, and second blank) were diluted to a total volume of 250&#x202F;&#x03BC;L with potassium chloride buffer (pH 1.0) in one plate and with sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.5) in the second plate. The microplates were placed in a Nano+ spectrophotometer (<italic>Tecan</italic>, Switzerland), shaken for 1&#x202F;min at a 2&#x202F;mm amplitude, incubated for 20&#x202F;min in the dark, shaken again for 1&#x202F;min, and absorbance was measured at 520&#x202F;nm and 700&#x202F;nm. Anthocyanin content was calculated according to <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="E1">Equation 1</xref>:</p>
<disp-formula id="E1">
<mml:math id="M1">
<mml:mtext>Anthocyanin content</mml:mtext>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mtable columnalign="left" displaystyle="true">
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mtext>cyanidin</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>O</mml:mi>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>glucoside</mml:mtext>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>eq</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>mg</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mtable columnalign="left">
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">MW</mml:mi>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">DF</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mn>10</mml:mn>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x03B5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M2">
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>520</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>nm</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>700</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>nm</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>pH</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mn>1.0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>520</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>nm</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>700</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>nm</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mi>pH</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mn>4.5</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>;</mml:mo>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula></p>
<p>MW&#x202F;=&#x202F;cyanidin-3-<italic>O</italic>-glucoside molecular weight (449.2&#x202F;g/mol);</p>
<p>DF&#x202F;=&#x202F;dilution factor;</p>
<p>&#x03B5;&#x202F;=&#x202F;26,900 M extinction coefficient, L/mol/cm for cyanidin-3-<italic>O</italic>-glucoside;</p>
<p>l&#x202F;=&#x202F;well path length in cm = <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M3">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>977</mml:mn>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">nm</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>900</mml:mn>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">nm</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>977</mml:mn>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">nm</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>900</mml:mn>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">nm</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>977</mml:mn>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">nm</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>900</mml:mn>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">nm</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0.18</mml:mn>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (absorbance measured for distilled water).</p>
<p>The extraction yield, g anthocyanin/100&#x202F;g dry berry press residue, was calculated using the following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="E2">Equation 2</xref>:</p>
<disp-formula id="E2">
<mml:math id="M4">
<mml:mi>mg</mml:mi>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>TAC</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>dry</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mtext>berry press residue</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mtable columnalign="left">
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mtext>Anthocyanin content</mml:mtext>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>mg</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mtext>extr</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable>
<mml:mtable columnalign="left">
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mtext>Weighed sample</mml:mtext>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mtext>weight</mml:mtext>
<mml:mspace width="0.25em"/>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>Measurement of total polyphenolics by Folin&#x2013;Ciocalteu method</title>
<p>Total polyphenolic content (TPC) in the berry press residues was measured using the Folin&#x2013;Ciocalteu colorimetric method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Siriwoharn et al., 2004</xref>). Samples were filtered through 0.45&#x202F;&#x03BC;m membrane filters and diluted before analysis. For honeysuckle berry and chokeberry extracts, 100&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of sample was diluted with 900&#x202F;&#x03BC;L extraction solvent.</p>
<p>In a 96-well plate, 95&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of deionised water (100&#x202F;&#x03BC;L for the blank) was pipetted, followed by 5&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of diluted, filtered berry press residue extract. Then 85&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of Folin&#x2013;Ciocalteu reagent was added, and the plate was shaken for 5&#x202F;min at 2&#x202F;mm amplitude and incubated for 30&#x202F;min. Then 65&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of 7.5% sodium carbonate solution was added, shaken for 1&#x202F;min at 2&#x202F;mm amplitude and incubated for 9&#x202F;min. Then the absorbance was measured at 765&#x202F;nm.</p>
<p>A calibration curve made from gallic acid was used to calculate the total polyphenol concentration. Nine calibration points in the concentration range of 2.0&#x2013;19.8&#x202F;&#x03BC;g/mL were prepared from a 99.2&#x202F;&#x03BC;g/mL gallic acid working solution by pipetting 5&#x2013;50&#x202F;&#x03BC;L gallic acid working solution into a 96-well plate and diluting to 100&#x202F;&#x03BC;L with deionised water, then repeating the previously described procedure. A calibration curve was constructed using the obtained absorbance data, with R<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.993 (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>). The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 1.31&#x202F;&#x03BC;g/mL and 3.96&#x202F;&#x03BC;g/mL, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<title>Measurement of radical scavenging potential by DPPH method</title>
<p>Radical scavenging potential of berry press residues was determined using an adapted 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Klavins et al., 2022</xref>). Samples were filtered through 0.45&#x202F;&#x03BC;m membrane filters and diluted before analysis, following the same procedure as in the total polyphenolics analysis method. In a 96-well plate, 45&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of 96% ethanol (50&#x202F;&#x03BC;L for the blank) was pipetted, 5&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of diluted filtered berry press residue extract and 150&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of DPPH reagent were added, stirred for 1&#x202F;min at 2&#x202F;mm amplitude and incubated for 9&#x202F;min. The absorbance was measured at 517&#x202F;nm.</p>
<p>A calibration curve made from Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid) standard solution was used to calculate the antiradical activity. Six calibration points in the concentration range of 3.81&#x2013;19.05&#x202F;&#x03BC;g/mL were prepared from a 152.4&#x202F;&#x03BC;g/mL Trolox standard solution by pipetting 5&#x2013;25&#x202F;&#x03BC;L of the Trolox standard solution into a 96-well plate and diluting to 50&#x202F;&#x03BC;L with 96% ethanol, then repeating the previously described procedure. A calibration curve was constructed using the obtained absorbance data, with R<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.9992 (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure 2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<title>Qualitative and quantitative analysis of anthocyanins by UPLC-PDA-MS/MS</title>
<p>To determine the berry press residue anthocyanin profile, the European Pharmacopoeia 7.0 instrumental method &#x201C;Fresh bilberry fruit dry extract, refined and standardised&#x201D; (01/2016:2394) with some modifications was used. Before analysis, the berry press residue extracts were filtered through 0.45&#x202F;&#x03BC;m membrane filters. Chromatography vials were filled with 1.00&#x202F;mL sample and determination of anthocyanin profile was carried out using Waters Acquity UPLC H- class (<italic>Waters</italic>, United States) consisting of a ultra-high-pressure gradient unit (Quaternary Solvent Manager), an auto injector (FTN), a column oven (CH-A), a photo-diode array PDA e&#x03BB; detector and MS detector (XEVO TQD with Zspray ESI/APSI/ESCi) with electrospray ionisation (ES-), capillary voltage 3.50&#x202F;kV, cone voltage 40&#x202F;V, ion source temperature 150&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, spray temperature 400&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, spray gas flow 300&#x202F;L/h, a cone gas counterflow of 50&#x202F;L/h, a collision energy of 15&#x202F;V, argon at 3,5 &#x2219;10<sup>&#x2212;3</sup> mBar as collision gas, an ion recording range of 200&#x2013;1700&#x202F;m/z (0.15&#x202F;s), and an operating mode of SIR. Anthocyanin separation was carried out at 35&#x202F;&#x00B0;C using an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7&#x202F;&#x03BC;m, 2.1&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;150&#x202F;mm). The mobile phases were deionised water (A), methanol (B), formic acid (C) and acetonitrile (D) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). The flow rate was set to 0.250&#x202F;mL/min, and the gradient elution was set according to <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>. Data was collected using Waters Empower software. Identification of individual anthocyanins was based on the PDA detection at 520&#x202F;nm and further UPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis to identify the molecular ions ([M]+) and diagnostic fragment ions corresponding to the anthocyanin aglycones. MS/MS spectra were further compared with reference spectra available in the <italic>mzCloud</italic> mass spectral database (<italic>Thermo Fisher Scientific</italic>), data reported in the European Pharmacopoeia and relevant literature to support compound assignment.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Gradient used for chromatographic separation of berry press residue anthocyanins.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Time, min</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">A, %</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">B, %</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">C, %</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">D, %</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">0.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">10.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">83</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">15.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">82</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">19.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">83</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">25.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">25</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">30.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">57</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">25</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">31.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">38.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Values for (A) water, (B) methanol, (C) formic acid, and (D) acetonitrile represent the % of each solvent in the mobile phase gradient.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Quantification of individual anthocyanins was done using external calibration prepared from Cyanidin-3-glucoside (kuromanin chloride)&#x202F;&#x2265;&#x202F;96.0% (<italic>Extrasynthese</italic>, France). Calibration curve was prepare din the concentration range from 0.01&#x202F;mg cyanidin-3-glucoside (C3G) eq./mL to 2.4 C3G eq./mL (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure 3</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<title>Statistics and data analysis</title>
<p>Data visualisation and statistical analysis have been done using the programme &#x201C;R&#x201D; (version 2023.06.2&#x202F;+&#x202F;561), using ggplot2 (version 3.5.1), corrplot (version 0.95), dplyr (version 1.1.4), GGally (version 2.3.0) and readxl (version 1.4.3) data packages. Correlation analysis between TAC, TPC, and DPPH was performed using Spearman&#x2019;s rank correlation coefficients to evaluate the associations between total anthocyanin content, total polyphenolics, and antioxidant activity. Individual correlations between drying methods in each berry press residue sample, depending on the temperature, were done using Pearson&#x2019;s correlation analysis for TAC, TPC and DPPH. A pairwise correlation matrix was constructed using the <italic>ggpairs</italic> function with LOESS regression fits for identification of non-linear trends and kernel density estimates.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec17">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec18">
<title>Effect of temperature and drying method on total polyphenolic content</title>
<p>The effect of conventional and vacuum drying at different temperatures on total polyphenolic content (TPC) in 10 types of berry press residues was evaluated using the Folin&#x2013;Ciocalteu method. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the changes in total polyphenol concentration depending on drying temperature and method for each berry species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of drying method and temperature on the total polyphenolic content (TPC) of different berry species. Each panel represents a different berry type, data points show mean TPC values (mg/100&#x202F;g)&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;standard deviation (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;5) across drying temperatures from 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C to 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C. <italic>r</italic> represents the Pearson correlation coefficient for the respective drying method, and the asterisk (&#x002A;) indicates a statistically significant correlation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fsufs-09-1733151-g001.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Line graphs display the Total Phenolic Content (TPC) in milligrams per one hundred grams of dry weight for different fruits: bilberry, black currant, blueberry, chokeberry, cranberry, elderberry, honeysuckle, raspberry, red currant, and strawberry. Each graph compares TPC using conventional, freeze, and vacuum drying methods across various temperatures in degrees Celsius, plus a frozen state. The legend indicates purple for conventional drying, pink for freeze drying, and blue for vacuum drying. Statistical correlation coefficients (r-values) are noted for each graph, indicating varying relationships between temperature and TPC.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Freeze drying, used as a baseline control to indicate possibly the lowest degradation within the samples, yielded the highest polyphenolic retention across all tested berry species, with mean TPC values as high as 8,377&#x202F;mg/100&#x202F;g DW of chokeberry press residues.</p>
<p>The concentration of polyphenols decreased in the samples with increasing temperature from 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C to 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C. Exceptions in this trend were observed for cranberries (using both drying methods) and strawberries (using vacuum drying). These findings confirm the widely reported efficiency of freeze drying in preserving thermolabile bioactive compounds due to the absence of oxidation and thermal stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Ma et al., 2023</xref>). Freeze drying thus represents a method that can induce minimal polyphenolic degradation, providing polyphenolic retention similar to fresh material.</p>
<p>Conventional hot air drying showed relatively stable TPC values in the temperature range from 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C to 75&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, indicating that moderate drying temperatures do not necessarily result in polyphenolic loss and, in some cases, are comparable to the used control freeze drying. However, at 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, the TPC decreased sharply and was reduced significantly in most samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). It was observed that the drying temperature and TPC showed a negative relation, where increasing the temperature significantly reduced the TPC. The sharp reduction at 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C suggests a temperature threshold at which the degradation of polyphenolics is likely accelerated, possibly due to the combined effects of thermal breakdown and oxidation. The non-linear response of TPC to temperature implies that polyphenolic stability cannot be assumed to decline gradually, but rather that certain processing conditions can trigger increased degradation.</p>
<p>Vacuum drying displayed a specific pattern where the characteristics of conventional and freeze drying were combined. At lower temperatures (30&#x2013;60&#x202F;&#x00B0;C), mean TPC values between vacuum and freeze drying were statistically indistinguishable (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). At 75&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, vacuum drying shows higher TPC retention than conventional drying, suggesting that reduced oxygen availability delays degradation. However, at 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, TPC were reduced significantly for most of the tested berries, closely resembling the values of conventional drying at the same temperature. These findings suggest that oxygen exclusion is effective at mitigating degradation under mild to moderate temperature conditions, but once the temperature exceeds certain thresholds, the exclusion of oxygen is insufficient to mitigate the degradation effects.</p>
<p>When comparing phenolic contents between samples dried at 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C and 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, clear berry- and method-specific differences were observed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Generally, the TPC values decreased significantly with the temperature increase for all the berries and methods evaluated; however, the magnitude at which the losses happened varied. Chokeberry and honeysuckle berry TPC decreased by 50% or more under conventional and vacuum drying, indicating high susceptibility of these matrices to thermal degradation. In contrast, raspberries, strawberries, and cranberries exhibited a more moderate decline in TPC (2&#x2013;19%), suggesting greater thermal stability (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative changes in the total polyphenolic content (TPC) between 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C and 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C drying treatments for different berry press residues under conventional and vacuum drying. Values above the bars represent the relative loss between the 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C and 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C drying temperatures. The error bars represent the standard deviation of measurements (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;5). Asterisks above the bars represent statistically significant differences, where &#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05; &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01; &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001 (ANOVA, Tukey HSD).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fsufs-09-1733151-g002.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart showing the percentage reduction in total phenolic content (TPC) for various berries using two drying methods: conventional (purple) and vacuum (blue). Honeysuckle shows highest reduction with conventional drying at 58.2%, while cranberry shows the lowest at 2.1%. Error bars indicate variability, with asterisks denoting statistical significance.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Across most berry types, vacuum drying consistently showed less degradation than conventional drying, leading to smaller relative differences between the low and high drying temperatures. This protective effect was particularly evident in raspberry, strawberry, and cranberry samples, where vacuum drying resulted in only 2&#x2013;5% TPC loss (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). A strong trend was observed: drying at 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C resulted in lower TPC than 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, confirming that the temperature is the dominant driver of phenolic compound degradation, regardless of the drying method used.</p>
<p>All drying methods showed high TPC variability, depending on the berry type and matrix composition. Berries with more robust cell structure (e.g., chokeberry) or berries with naturally higher TPC may withstand processing better than more delicate species such as strawberry. As the results indicate, it is important to assess the possible matrix effects across different species since the drying conditions cannot be generalised without considering inherent compositional differences. Taken together, the obtained results highlight a significant interaction between drying method and temperature regarding TPC. Freeze drying provides a reliable retention of phenolic compounds followed by vacuum drying at moderate temperatures (30&#x2013;60&#x202F;&#x00B0;C), giving similar TPC retention with lower energy requirement and processing time than freeze drying. However, both conventional and vacuum drying exhibit a degradation threshold between 75&#x202F;&#x00B0;C and 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, beyond which phenolic compounds were rapidly degraded, emphasising the need for controlled conditions during the drying process as well as balancing the energy consumption with final product quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<title>Effect of temperature and drying method on total anthocyanin content</title>
<p>The total anthocyanin content (TAC) of the different berries was strongly influenced by both drying methods and temperature. The highest TAC was observed in chokeberry dried under vacuum at 45&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, reaching up to 3,826&#x202F;mg/100&#x202F;g DW, while the lowest value was recorded in raspberry subjected to conventional drying at 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C (26&#x202F;mg/100&#x202F;g DW). These radically different values represent and highlight the combined effects of berry type and drying conditions on anthocyanin stability.</p>
<p>In general, chokeberry exhibited the highest TAC across all drying temperatures and methods, confirming its status as one of the richest natural sources of anthocyanins. Also, blueberry, bilberry, and honeysuckle berry maintained relatively high TAC values. In contrast, cranberry and raspberry showed considerably lower anthocyanin levels and distinct degradation patterns across the drying temperatures using both drying methods (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The control treatment &#x2013; freeze drying &#x2013; generally preserved anthocyanins more effectively than the thermal drying methods, with values close to or exceeding those obtained at the lowest (30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C) conventional or vacuum drying temperatures. Vacuum drying tended to provide higher TAC values than conventional drying, particularly in the temperature range 30&#x2013;60&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, where anthocyanin retention remained relatively high compared to the decrease between 75 and 90 &#x00B0;C. At 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, anthocyanin degradation was evident in all tested berry samples, although the extent of reduction was species dependent. Anthocyanin degradation for cranberry, blueberry, elderberry, honeysuckle berry, raspberry, and strawberry showed a clear linear relation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of drying method and temperature on the total anthocyanin content (TAC) of different berry species. Each panel represents a different berry type; data points show mean TAC values (mg/100&#x202F;g DW)&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;standard deviation (<italic>n&#x202F;=&#x202F;5</italic>) across drying temperatures from 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C to 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C. <italic>r</italic> represents the Pearson correlation coefficient for the respective drying method, the asterisk (&#x002A;) indicates a statistically significant correlation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fsufs-09-1733151-g003.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Line charts showing Total Anthocyanin Content (TAC) for various berries including bilberry, black currant, blueberry, chokeberry, cranberry, elderberry, honeysuckle, raspberry, red currant, and strawberry. Three drying methods are compared: conventional (purple), freeze (pink), and vacuum (blue), across different temperatures (degrees Celsius). Each chart includes correlation coefficients (r) for the drying methods. The TAC is measured in milligrams per one hundred grams dry weight, with varying trends for each berry.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Reduction in TAC was observed when comparing berry press residues dried at 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C and 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Significant reduction was observed across all berry types investigated, with the highest reduction observed in raspberries dried conventionally (up to 59.4%). Least reduction in TAC was observed for conventionally dried redcurrant press residues (9.7%). Regarding TAC content and the drying method used, it was observed that the vacuum drying method, in all types of berry press residues, retained more anthocyanins than the conventional drying (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). This indicates that the specific degradation of anthocyanins is dependent on the presence of oxygen &#x2013; prolonged exposure in elevated temperatures with oxygen present (conventional drying) leads to more pronounced anthocyanin degradation. In berries like bilberry, blueberry, chokeberry, where the TAC contents are the highest, the degradation using vacuum drying was recorded to be from 20 to 26% as opposed to the &#x003E;40&#x2013;50% in conventional drying (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative changes in the total anthocyanin content (TAC) between 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C and 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C drying treatments for different berry press residues under conventional and vacuum drying. Values above the bars represent the relative loss between the 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C and 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C drying temperatures. The error bars represent the standard deviation of measurements (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;5). Asterisks above the bars represent statistically significant differences, where &#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05; &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01; &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001 (ANOVA, Tukey HSD).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fsufs-09-1733151-g004.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart showing percentage reduction in TAC for various berries using conventional (purple) and vacuum drying (blue). Raspberry shows the highest reduction at 59.4% with conventional drying. Red currant shows a higher reduction with vacuum drying at 27.6% compared to 9.7% with conventional drying. Statistical significance is denoted with asterisks.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The results demonstrate the heat sensitivity of anthocyanins in berry press residue and highlight the importance of selecting the appropriate drying method for the preparation of dried products. Variation in TAC among berry species highlights the importance of matrix composition in stabilising or protecting anthocyanins: bilberry and blueberry showed good anthocyanin retention, while raspberry and honeysuckle berry anthocyanins were the most heat sensitive. Moreover, for retention of anthocyanins, it is advisable to choose drying methods that avoid the presence of oxygen and use temperatures in the range from 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C to 60&#x202F;&#x00B0;C.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<title>Effect of temperature and drying method on antioxidant capacity</title>
<p>DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined for all the berry press residue samples dried at different temperatures with each of the tested methods. Freeze drying, the mildest of the drying methods that avoids elevated temperatures and oxygen exposure, showed the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity for all of the tested berries, with the highest activity observed for freeze-dried chokeberry press residues (12,930 mg TE/100&#x202F;g DW), followed by honeysuckle berry (8,014&#x202F;mg TE/100&#x202F;g DW). These results indicate that maintaining low processing temperatures is critical for preserving antiradical scavenging activity, as significant reductions were observed for both thermal drying methods even at 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C. Vacuum drying at moderate temperatures (30&#x2013;60&#x202F;&#x00B0;C) was proven to retain the antioxidants responsible for DPPH activity better than conventional drying. While most berry press residues followed this pattern, some berry-specific deviations were evident, for example, honeysuckle berry showed increasing DPPH radical scavenging activity over the tested range of temperatures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). This suggests that, in addition to polyphenolics, other compounds (e.g., Maillard reaction products formed during thermal processing) may contribute to the antioxidant potential. These results are in line with the hypothesis that both temperature and the drying method can affect the antioxidant capacity of a product during processing. Although the trend of DPPH radical scavenging activity is non-linear with the TPC or TAC, it is worth noting that vacuum drying is the optimal method to be used for retention of valuable antioxidants in this type of waste biomass.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of drying method and temperature on the DPPH radical scavenging activity of different berry species. Each panel represents a different berry type; data points show mean DPPH values (mg TE/100&#x202F;g DW)&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;standard deviation (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;5) across drying temperatures from 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C to 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C. <italic>r</italic> represents the Pearson correlation coefficient for the respective drying method, the asterisk (&#x002A;) indicates a statistically significant correlation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fsufs-09-1733151-g005.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Graphs depicting the effects of different drying methods and temperatures on DPPH antioxidant levels in various berries, including bilberry, black currant, blueberry, chokeberry, cranberry, elderberry, honeysuckle, raspberry, red currant, and strawberry. The charts compare conventional drying (purple), freeze drying (pink), and vacuum drying (blue) at temperatures ranging from 30 to 90 degrees Celsius. Correlation coefficients are noted for each graph.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<title>TAC, TPC, and DPPH correlation</title>
<p>The relationship between total polyphenolic content (TPC), total anthocyanin content (TAC), and antioxidant activity (DPPH) was assessed across all drying treatments, and the results are summarised in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. Strong positive associations were observed between TPC and DPPH (r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.891<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup>), while TAC correlated positively with both TPC (r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.765<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup>) and DPPH (r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.662<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup>). These results suggest that total polyphenolic levels were the dominant contributors to antioxidant potential, whereas anthocyanins, while important, were not the sole determinants of radical-scavenging capacity. Importantly, these correlations were consistent across different drying methods, highlighting that the strength of association was not simply an artefact of processing. Within conventional, freeze-, and vacuum-dried samples, TPC remained strongly correlated to DPPH (r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.895, 0.964, and 0.901<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup>), emphasising the robustness of this relationship. TAC&#x2013;TPC correlations were also significant under all conditions (r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.718&#x2013;0.891), with the closest coupling observed for freeze-dried material, suggesting that anthocyanins behave as a relatively stable sub-fraction of total phenolics in this treatment, especially under milder processing conditions. By contrast, TAC&#x2013;DPPH associations were slightly weaker (r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.627&#x2013;0.782), pointing toward a more indirect or variable contribution of anthocyanins to antioxidant capacity, however, statistically, they show a strong relation.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation analysis between total polyphenolic content (TPC), total anthocyanin content (TAC), and antioxidant activity (DPPH assay) in berry press residue samples subjected to different drying techniques. Scatterplots with fitted regression lines (lower panels) show the association between variables with 95% confidence intervals (shaded areas). Density plots (diagonal panels) show the distribution of values across the different drying methods used. Correlation coefficients in the upper panels show the TPC, TAC and DPPH relation. Significant corelation are marked with &#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05; &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fsufs-09-1733151-g006.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Density and scatter plots compare different drying methods: conventional, freeze, and vacuum. Plots show Total Anthocyanin Content (TAC), Total Phenolic Content (TPC), and DPPH antioxidant activity, with freeze drying generally performing best. Correlation coefficients indicate the strength of association for each method. Key points are highlighted by colors: purple for conventional, pink for freeze, and blue for vacuum drying.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The smoothed regression fits (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) further emphasise these relationships - the TPC&#x2013;DPPH relation trend showed a nearly linear fit across the observed range, with a tendency toward stronger activity at higher phenolic concentrations, whereas TAC displayed greater dispersion and wider confidence intervals, particularly at intermediate values. Density plots along the diagonal (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) highlight that freeze-dried samples exhibited a broader distribution of both TPC and DPPH values, consistent with their higher correlation strength, while vacuum- and conventionally dried samples clustered more tightly. These findings suggest that while anthocyanins contribute to antioxidant activity, the potential of total phenolics is a more important and more consistent contributor. Thus, phenolic content as a whole, rather than anthocyanin concentration alone, appears to drive the radical-scavenging properties of the studied material, with processing method influencing the magnitude of the effect but not the overall pattern of association.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<title>Stability of individual anthocyanins in dried berry press residues</title>
<p>Analysis of individual anthocyanin profiles revealed that certain structures were markedly more sensitive to thermal degradation than others (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). Across all berries and drying methods, 24 individual anthocyanins were found. Cyanidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-sambubioside showed the highest mean reduction (54.2%), indicating exceptional thermal lability. Similarly, cyanidin 3,5-<italic>O</italic>-diglucoside and cyanidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-sophoroside were highly degraded (41.9 and 35.1% on average, respectively), with only marginal differences between conventional (C) and vacuum (V) drying (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). By contrast, rutinoside derivatives such as cyanidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-rutinoside displayed much lower reductions (19.8% under C, 16.0% under V), suggesting greater structural resilience to both heat and oxygen exposure. A compilation of chromatograms of the analysed blackcurrant shows the reduction in differently dried berry press residue anthocyanin profiles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Individual anthocyanins identified using UPLC-MS/MS in analysed berry press residues.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">S.no</th>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Compound name</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">RT (min)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Mol (m/z)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Frag (m/z)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Black Currant</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Honeysuckle</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Bilberry</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Elderberry</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Chokeberry</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Blueberry</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Raspberry</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Strawberry</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Cranberry</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Red Currant</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">V</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">C</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">V</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">C</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">V</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">C</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">V</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">C</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">V</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">C</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">V</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">C</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">V</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">C</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">V</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">C</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">V</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">C</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">V</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">C</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cyanidin 3,5-<italic>O</italic>-diglucoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">7.76</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">448</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">287</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">41.8%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">42.0%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Delphinidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-galactoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">7.97</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">464</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">302</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">16.1%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">37.9%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">23.9%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">56.2%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">20.4%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">38.7%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Delphinidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-glucoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">9.31</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">464</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">302</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">18.9%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">35.0%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">17.0%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">49.9%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.6%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">32.0%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">4</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cyanidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-galactoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.59</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">448</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">287</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">26.2%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">54.6%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">28.4%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">33.6%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">17.1%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">23.1%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">23.7%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">36.6%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">5</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cyanidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-sophoroside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">609</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">287</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">33.4%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">36.7%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Delphinidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-arabinoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.97</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">434</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">302</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">20.6%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">48.1%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">21.5%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">38.6%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Delphinidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-rutinoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.99</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">609</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">302</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">16.3%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">37.6%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">8</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cyanidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-glucoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">12.56</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">448</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">287</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">15.9%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">27.8%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">34.7%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">58.1%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">21.4%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">48.0%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">8.4%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">20.8%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">18.4%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">30.0%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">29.8%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">34.4%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.6%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">14.5%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.2%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.6%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">17.3%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cyanidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-sambubioside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">12.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">579</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">287</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">49.3%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">59.1%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Petunidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-galactoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">13.51</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">478</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">316</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">20.8%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">42.2%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">18.7%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">32.7%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">11</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cyanidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-arabinoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">13.93</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">418</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">287</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">27.9%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">50.8%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">26.6%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">35.0%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">18.1%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">27.4%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">27.6%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">40.6%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">12</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cyanidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-xylosyl-rutinoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">13.99</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">727</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">287</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">28.0%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">34.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cyanidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-rutinoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">15.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">593</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">287</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">16.5%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">34.0%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">28.2%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">14.6%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.8%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.3%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">13.5%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">26.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">14</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Petunidin 3-<italic>O</italic> -glucoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">15.42</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">479</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">316</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">14.7%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">43.6%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.5%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">32.9%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Pelargonidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-glucoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">15.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">433</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">270</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">8.6%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">11.9%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">36.0%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">62.5%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Peonidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-galactoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">16.40</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">463</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">300</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">15.1%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">30.4%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.3%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">9.0%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">28.8%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">41.8%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">17</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Petunidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-arabinoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">17.03</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">448</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">316</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">14.0%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">38.3%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">15.5%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">30.4%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">18</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Pelargonidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-rutinoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">577</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">270</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">12.0%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.4%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">19</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Peonidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-glucoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.36</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">462</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">300</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">31.9%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">29.1%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">24.1%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">41.9%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">24.1%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">22.1%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">7.9%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">9.3%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">20</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Malvidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-galactoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.95</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">492</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">330</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">22.8%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">37.6%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">23.7%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">42.6%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">21</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cyanidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-xyloside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">21.55</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">418</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">287</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">24.9%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">33.0%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">22</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Peonidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-arabinoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">21.89</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">432</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">300</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.7%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">14.6%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.7%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">13.9%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">27.5%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">40.5%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">23</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Malvidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-glucoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">22.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">492</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">330</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">20.2%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">42.2%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">23.7%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">37.5%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">24</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Malvidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-arabinoside</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">23.12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">462</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">330</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">14.8%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">31.9%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">25.5%</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">39.6%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>The mean values (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;3) represent the difference in anthocyanin contents between samples dried at 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C and 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C using conventional (C) and vacuum drying (V) methods.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Representative chromatograms of extracts from blackcurrant press residues dried using conventional drying (C) and vacuum drying (V) at 30&#x202F;&#x00B0;C and 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C. The numbers above the peaks represent individual anthocyanins identified in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fsufs-09-1733151-g007.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">A 3D graph displays the intensity over retention time for two drying methods: conventional drying in purple and vacuum drying in blue. Peaks in intensity indicate various retention times, differentiated by temperature labels such as C 30&#x00B0;C, C 90&#x00B0;C, V 30&#x00B0;C, and V 90&#x00B0;C. The legend at the top left indicates the color-coded drying methods.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>A consistent pattern emerged in which rutinosylated and glucosylated forms (e.g., cyanidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-rutinoside, delphinidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-glucoside, malvidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-glucoside) were comparatively stable, typically showing 18&#x2013;30% reduction, whereas diglucosides and sambubiosides were markedly less stable, with 40&#x2013;60% losses (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). This structural trend suggests that acylation or rutinosylation may confer protection against heat-driven cleavage and oxidative breakdown, whereas more labile linkages (e.g., sophoroside and sambubioside groups) are especially vulnerable.</p>
<p>When comparing drying methods, vacuum drying systematically was able to avoid anthocyanin loss across almost all analysed anthocyanins and samples, although the magnitude varied. For instance, cyanidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-arabinoside decreased by 38.5% under conventional drying but only 25.1% under vacuum, while delphinidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-galactoside dropped from 37.0% (C) to 23.9% (V) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). However, for compounds already highly unstable (e.g., cyanidin 3-<italic>O</italic>-sambubioside), the protective effect of vacuum was limited, with degradation remaining high under both drying methods (59.1% vs. 49.3%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<p>Together, these findings highlight that anthocyanin degradation is not uniform across berry matrices but strongly influenced by the molecular structure of individual anthocyanins. Glycosylation pattern appears to be a major determinant of thermal stability, with rutinosides and simple glucosides showing the greatest resilience, while sambubiosides and diglucosides are disproportionately degraded. These trends provide novel insight into structure&#x2013;stability relationships of anthocyanins during drying, underscoring the importance of considering individual anthocyanin chemistry, in addition to total anthocyanin content, when evaluating the nutritional and functional quality of processed berry products.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec23">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>This study demonstrated that both assessed drying methods and the used temperature critically influence the stability of polyphenolic compounds, anthocyanins, and the related antioxidant activity of the berry press residues. Among the methods tested, freeze drying consistently retained the highest levels of bioactive compounds across all berry species, aligning with the findings that this drying method is the mildest in terms of degradation of bioactive compounds due to the absence of both heat and oxygen during the treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Wojdy&#x0142;o et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Sadilova et al., 2006</xref>). Findings in this study demonstrated that vacuum drying at moderate temperatures (30&#x2013;60&#x202F;&#x00B0;C) can yield comparable retention of total polyphenolics (TPC) and total anthocyanins (TAC), suggesting it as a viable, more energy-efficient alternative. The protective effect of vacuum drying appears to be due to the reduced oxidative environment, which slows degradation processes otherwise accelerated in conventional drying. This observation is consistent with the conclusions of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Kechinski et al. (2021)</xref>, who reported that oxygen exclusion substantially improved anthocyanin stability in freeze-dried and encapsulated berry products. In this work, berries such as raspberries, strawberries, and cranberries retained up to 98% of their TPC under vacuum drying at low temperatures, in contrast to the 40&#x2013;60% losses observed under conventional drying at 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C. These differences show the role of oxidative stress in polyphenolic compound degradation and highlight how even moderate thermal stress becomes an even more important parameter when oxygen is present. Degradation of the investigated compound groups is not simply a linear function of temperature. A critical finding from this study was the non-linear nature of polyphenol and anthocyanin degradation, where it became especially evident between 75&#x202F;&#x00B0;C and 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C. This threshold effect is consistent with kinetic models of anthocyanin degradation, which describe rapid compound breakdown beyond a certain activation energy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Patras et al., 2010</xref>). At 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, the integrity of both TPC and TAC was markedly compromised across nearly all berry types and drying methods, suggesting that once this temperature threshold is surpassed, degradation is accelerated by both heat and oxygen. This is further supported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Saikia and Mahnot (2020)</xref>, who showed that fruit and vegetable antioxidants undergo abrupt losses at elevated temperatures due to thermal decomposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Saikia and Mahnot, 2020</xref>). Interestingly, the magnitude of degradation varied considerably between the tested berry species, which suggests that matrix effects might play a significant role. Chokeberry and honeysuckle, for instance, displayed the highest initial levels of TPC and TAC but also showed the most intensive degradation losses under high-temperature treatments. This might be attributed to the denser matrix and higher initial antioxidant loads, which could in turn make them more vulnerable to thermal stress, as previously suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Zhang et al. (2023)</xref>. Conversely, raspberries, strawberries, and cranberries, with their more delicate cellular structures, retained greater TPC stability, particularly under vacuum drying. This aligns with findings from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Reis et al. (2018)</xref>, who noted that porosity and moisture migration rates influence drying efficiency and compound preservation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Reis et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>The anthocyanin profile analysis provided further insights into the degradation behaviour of individual anthocyanin compounds. Our data show a clear relation between the structural characteristics and anthocyanin stability. Cyanidin derivatives with sambubioside or diglucoside groups exhibited degradation rates exceeding 50%, whereas rutinoside and glucoside forms were substantially more stable. Similar trends were observed in a review article by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Khoo et al. (2017)</xref>, who emphasised the role of glycosylation in enhancing anthocyanin colour characteristics and the stabilising of the flavylium cation structure or forming protective copigmentation complexes. The degradation resistance of rutinoside derivatives under both vacuum and conventional drying supports the view that anthocyanin structure is a major determinant of stability, regardless of drying method used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Li et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Beyond compound stability, this study also addressed how the changes in TPC and TAC affect antioxidant capacity. DPPH radical scavenging activity was positively correlated with both TPC (r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.891) and TAC (r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.662) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>), though the association was significantly stronger for polyphenols. This suggests that while anthocyanins contribute to antioxidant potential, they are not the main contributing factor. These findings are consistent with earlier studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">K&#x00E4;hk&#x00F6;nen et al. (1999)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Jakobek (2015)</xref>, which emphasised that phenolic acids, flavonols, and flavan-3-ols often play a more central role in antioxidant responses than anthocyanins alone. The strong and consistent TPC&#x2013;DPPH relationship across all drying methods (r&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.89) further supports this conclusion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>), indicating that total phenolic content is a more reliable predictor of antioxidant function in thermally processed berry matrices than anthocyanin contents.</p>
<p>Taken together, the results of this study not only reinforce known principles of thermal degradation but also provide novel insights into the interplay between berry matrix, anthocyanin structure, and processing technologies. One particularly valuable implication is that vacuum drying at 45&#x2013;60&#x202F;&#x00B0;C can serve as a practical and scalable compromise between the nutrient and phytochemical preserving ability of freeze drying and the energy demands of conventional heat-based drying. Additionally, the data suggests a potential for optimisation of drying strategies based on berry species and target compounds. For instance, when maximising anthocyanin retention in chokeberry or blueberry, vacuum drying below 60&#x202F;&#x00B0;C appears most effective. For polyphenol-rich matrices intended for antioxidant extracts, a broader temperature tolerance may be acceptable, particularly if vacuum drying is employed, however, the balancing between product final costs must be considered. In terms of practical applications, these findings are particularly relevant for the valorisation strategies employed for berry press residues, which is a growing field in food sustainability, as suggested by recent research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Huang et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Jagelavi&#x010D;i&#x016B;t&#x0117; et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Pedisi&#x0107; et al., 2025</xref>). As food and beverage industries generate increasing amounts of polyphenol-rich by-products, understanding how to preserve these bioactive compounds during stabilisation processes for storage becomes crucial. The findings of this study offer guidance for designing drying protocols that retain the nutritional and functional properties of berry waste streams, potentially enabling their use in nutraceuticals, functional foods, or natural colourants.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec24">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The influence of drying methods and different drying temperatures on 10 berry press residues was evaluated. Generally, the effects and trends on TPC and TAC degradation were consistent regardless of the method or temperature used. Freeze drying, used as the control method, consistently provided the highest retention of both TAC and TPC, confirming its role as the reference standard for preserving bioactive compounds. Vacuum drying outperformed conventional drying at moderate temperatures (30&#x2013;60&#x202F;&#x00B0;C), producing anthocyanin and phenolic levels that were statistically comparable to those achieved by freeze drying. However, at 90&#x202F;&#x00B0;C, both vacuum and conventional drying led to pronounced degradation, demonstrating that while oxygen exclusion can slow oxidative losses, it cannot mitigate the thermal stress that occurs at temperatures above 75&#x202F;&#x00B0;C. The obtained results show a relation between the structural characteristics and anthocyanin stability &#x2013; cyanidin derivatives with sambubioside or diglucoside groups were identified as the most vulnerable to degradation while rutinoside and glucoside forms were substantially more stable. Overall, these results highlight a dual perspective: while TPC demonstrates moderate resilience to heat, anthocyanins represent the most vulnerable fraction of berry phenolics. The combined analysis therefore reveals that preserving berry quality requires not only careful control of drying temperature, but also an awareness of compound-specific stability profiles. Chokeberry, bilberry, and blueberry emerge as potential candidates for higher-value processing, while raspberry and cranberry demand stricter technological control to retain their anthocyanin-rich character. Berry press residues hold potential for incorporation in various food products as functional ingredients. Drying is the preferred method to increase the shelf life of berry press residues for further use in the food industry &#x2013; it is economically viable, and it produces a stable product that can be introduced in a variety of food articles. Our findings emphasise the importance of drying method choice and demonstrate how drying optimisation can provide higher added-value ingredients for the food industry.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec25">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec26">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>TG: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. AZ: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Writing &#x2013; original draft. JK: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. LK: Visualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Methodology, Conceptualization, Data curation, Supervision.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>The authors of this article would like to thank JSC &#x201C;Very Berry&#x201D; for kindly providing the berry press residues used for the experiments.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec27">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec28">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec29">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec30">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1733151/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1733151/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.DOCX" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Agraso-Otero</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rebolledo-Leiva</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Entrena-Barbero</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Garc&#x00ED;a</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Integrated process design, techno-economic and environmental analysis of chokeberry pomace biorefineries: phenolic compounds extraction with ethanol or energy production</article-title>. <source>Environ. Technol. Innov.</source> <volume>38</volume>:<fpage>104165</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eti.2025.104165</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barba</surname><given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajha</surname><given-names>H. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Debs</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abi-Khattar</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khabbaz</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dar</surname><given-names>B. N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Optimization of polyphenols&#x2019; recovery from purple corn cobs assisted by infrared technology and use of extracted anthocyanins as a natural colorant in pickled turnip</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>5222</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules27165222</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36014470</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Calabuig-Jim&#x00E9;nez</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hinestroza-C&#x00F3;rdoba</surname><given-names>L. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barrera</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Segu&#x00ED;</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Betoret</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effects of processing and storage conditions on functional properties of powdered blueberry pomace</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>1839</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su14031839</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Belwal</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>D. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Updated insights into anthocyanin stability behavior from bases to cases: why and why not anthocyanins lose during food processing</article-title>. <source>Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.</source> <volume>63</volume>:<fpage>250</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10408398.2022.2063250</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35435782</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Advances in embedding techniques of anthocyanins: improving stability, bioactivity, and bioavailability</article-title>. <source>Food Chemistry: X</source> <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>100983</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100983</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38144721</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Diaconeasa</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iuhas</surname><given-names>C. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayvaz</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mortas</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farcas</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mihai</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Anthocyanins from agro-industrial food waste: geographical approach and methods of recovery-a review</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>74</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants12010074</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36616202</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Diez-S&#x00E1;nchez</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quiles</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hernando</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Use of berry pomace to design functional foods</article-title>. <source>Food Rev. Int.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>3204</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3224</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/87559129.2021.2010217</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Donno</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neirotti</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fioccardi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Razafindrakoto</surname><given-names>Z. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tombozara</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mellano</surname><given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Freeze-drying for the reduction of fruit and vegetable chain losses: a sustainable solution to produce potential health-promoting food applications</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>168</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants14020168</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39861522</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Enaru</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dre&#x021B;canu</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pop</surname><given-names>T. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>St&#x01CE;nil&#x01CE;</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Diaconeasa</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Anthocyanins: factors affecting their stability and degradation</article-title>. <source>Antioxidants</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1967</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antiox10121967</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34943070</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gr&#x00E1;ndez-Yoplac</surname><given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mori-Mestanza</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mu&#x00F1;&#x00F3;z-Astecker</surname><given-names>L. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cayo-Colca</surname><given-names>I. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Castro-Alayo</surname><given-names>E. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Kinetics drying of blackberry bagasse and degradation of anthocyanins and bioactive properties</article-title>. <source>Antioxidants</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>548</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antiox10040548</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33916079</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hellali</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kora&#x00EF;</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The impact of innovation level and emotional response on upcycled food acceptance</article-title>. <source>Food Qual. Prefer.</source> <volume>107</volume>:<fpage>104849</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104849</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiao</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ba</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Active ingredients of blueberry pomace: a comprehensive review of isolation, identification, health benefits and food applications</article-title>. <source>Food Chem. X</source> <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>102459</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102459</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40321340</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jagelavi&#x010D;i&#x016B;t&#x0117;</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ba&#x0161;inskien&#x0117;</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x010C;i&#x017E;eikien&#x0117;</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Enhancing the nutritional value of foods through probiotics and dietary fiber from fruit and berry pomace</article-title>. <source>Fermentation</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>481</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/fermentation11080481</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jakobek</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Interactions of polyphenols with carbohydrates, lipids and proteins</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>175</volume>, <fpage>556</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>567</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.013</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25577120</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>K&#x00E4;hk&#x00F6;nen</surname><given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hopia</surname><given-names>A. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heinonen</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>3954</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3962</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf990146l</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10552749</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kechinski</surname><given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gutkoski</surname><given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seraglio</surname><given-names>S. K. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nehring</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Degradation kinetics of anthocyanins in freeze-dried and encapsulated blueberry extracts: a thermodynamic approach</article-title>. <source>J. Food Process. Preserv.</source> <volume>45</volume>:<fpage>e15050</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jfpp.15050</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khoo</surname><given-names>H. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azlan</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>S. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lim</surname><given-names>S. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Anthocyanidins and anthocyanins: colored pigments as food, pharmaceutical ingredients, and the potential health benefits</article-title>. <source>Food Nutr. Res.</source> <volume>61</volume>:<fpage>1361779</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/16546628.2017.1361779</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28970777</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Klavins</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kviesis</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakurte</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klavins</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Berry press residues as a valuable source of polyphenolics: extraction optimisation and analysis</article-title>. <source>Lwt</source> <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>583</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>591</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lwt.2018.04.021</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Klavins</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perkons</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mezulis</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Viksna</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klavins</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Procyanidins from cranberry press residues&#x2014;extraction optimization, purification and characterization</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>3517</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants11243517</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36559628</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Durst</surname><given-names>R. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wrolstad</surname><given-names>R. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Determination of total monomeric anthocyanin pigment content of fruit juices, beverages, natural colorants, and wines by the pH differential method: collaborative study</article-title>. <source>J. AOAC Int.</source> <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>1269</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1278</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jaoac/88.5.1269</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16385975</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Glycosides changed the stability and antioxidant activity of pelargonidin</article-title>. <source>Lwt</source> <volume>147</volume>:<fpage>111581</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111581</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Z. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zielinska</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>L. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Improvement of drying efficiency and quality attributes of blueberries using innovative far-infrared radiation heating assisted pulsed vacuum drying (FIR-PVD)</article-title>. <source>Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol.</source> <volume>77</volume>:<fpage>102948</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ifset.2022.102948</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bi</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Freeze-drying of fruits and vegetables in food industry: effects on phytochemicals and bioactive properties attributes-a comprehensive review</article-title>. <source>Food Rev. Int.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>6611</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6629</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/87559129.2022.2122992</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nemetz</surname><given-names>N. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schieber</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weber</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Application of crude pomace powder of chokeberry, bilberry, and elderberry as a coloring foodstuff</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>26</volume>:<fpage>2689</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules26092689</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34064428</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Patras</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brunton</surname><given-names>N. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O'Donnell</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tiwari</surname><given-names>B. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Effect of thermal processing on anthocyanin stability in foods; mechanisms and kinetics of degradation</article-title>. <source>Trends Food Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tifs.2009.07.004</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pedisi&#x0107;</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zori&#x0107;</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Repaji&#x0107;</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levaj</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dobrin&#x010D;i&#x0107;</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Balbino</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Valorization of berry fruit by-products: bioactive compounds, extraction, health benefits, encapsulation and food applications</article-title>. <source>Foods</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>1354</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods14081354</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40282756</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>P&#x00E9;rez-Marroqu&#x00ED;n</surname><given-names>X. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Estrada-Fern&#x00E1;ndez</surname><given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garc&#x00ED;a-Ceja</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aguirre-&#x00C1;lvarez</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le&#x00F3;n-L&#x00F3;pez</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Agro-food waste as an ingredient in functional beverage processing: sources, functionality, market and regulation</article-title>. <source>Foods</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>1583</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods12081583</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37107379</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reis</surname><given-names>S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rai</surname><given-names>D. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abu-Ghannam</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jaiswal</surname><given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Optimisation of phenolic extraction from <italic>Rubus fruticosus</italic> using RSM and study of its antimicrobial and antioxidant activity</article-title>. <source>Food Biosci.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>12</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fbio.2018.02.002</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sadilova</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stintzing</surname><given-names>F. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carle</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Thermal degradation of acylated and nonacylated anthocyanins</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>C504</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>C512</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00197.x</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saikia</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahnot</surname><given-names>N. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Impact of hot air drying on total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of different fruits and vegetables</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>2051</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2060</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13197-019-04203-6</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Siriwoharn</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wrolstad</surname><given-names>R. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Finn</surname><given-names>C. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>C. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Influence of cultivar, maturity, and sampling on blackberry (Rubus L. hybrids) anthocyanins, polyphenolics, and antioxidant properties</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>8021</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8030</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf048619y</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15612791</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stanca</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bilteanu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bujor</surname><given-names>O. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ion</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petre</surname><given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x0103;dulescu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Development of functional foods: a comparative study on the polyphenols and anthocyanins content in chokeberry and blueberry pomace extracts and their antitumor properties</article-title>. <source>Foods</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>2552</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods13162552</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39200479</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tena</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asuero</surname><given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Up-to-date analysis of the extraction methods for anthocyanins: principles of the techniques, optimization, technical progress, and industrial application</article-title>. <source>Antioxidants</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>286</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antiox11020286</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35204169</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wojdy&#x0142;o</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Figiel</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oszmia&#x0144;ski</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Effect of drying methods with the application of vacuum microwaves on the bioactive compounds, color, and antioxidant activity of strawberry fruits</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>1337</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1343</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf802944g</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Battino</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Giampieri</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Recovering high value-added anthocyanins from blueberry pomace with ultrasound-assisted extraction</article-title>. <source>Food Chemistry: X</source> <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>100476</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100476</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36277868</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of four drying methods on the quality, antioxidant activity and anthocyanin components of blueberry pomace</article-title>. <source>Food Prod. Process. Nutr.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>35</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s43014-023-00150-3</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3083893/overview">Rakesh Kumar Gupta</ext-link>, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3260355/overview">N. Sai Prasanna</ext-link>, Indian Institute of Technology, Tirupati, India</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3320856/overview">Atul Khalangre</ext-link>, University of Bologna, Italy</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>