<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Sustain. Food Syst.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Sustain. Food Syst.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2571-581X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsufs.2021.659290</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Sustainable Food Systems</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Low Temperature Biodisinfection Effectiveness for <italic>Phytophthora capsici</italic> Control of Protected Sweet Pepper Crops in the Southeast of Spain</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Guerrero</surname> <given-names>Mar&#x000ED;a del Mar</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1026619/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>Carmen M&#x000AA;</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1214192/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>Victoriano</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>M&#x000AA; Carmen</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Monserrat</surname> <given-names>Antonio</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Larregla</surname> <given-names>Santiago</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Instituto Murciano de Investigaci&#x000F3;n y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario, Dpto. Biotecnolog&#x000ED;a y Protecci&#x000F3;n de Cultivos</institution>, <addr-line>Murcia</addr-line>, <country>Spain</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Plant Production and Protection Department, NEIKER-Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development</institution>, <addr-line>Derio</addr-line>, <country>Spain</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Henrique Manuel da Fonseca Trindade, University of Tr&#x000E1;s-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Jose Antonio Pascual, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient&#x000ED;ficas (CSIC), Spain; Berta De Los Santos, Centro IFAPA Las Torres (CAPDER - JA), Spain</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x0002A;Correspondence: Mar&#x000ED;a del Mar Guerrero <email>mariam.guerrero&#x00040;carm.es</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><p>This article was submitted to Waste Management in Agroecosystems, a section of the journal Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>14</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<elocation-id>659290</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>27</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>14</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2021 Guerrero, Lacasa, Mart&#x000ED;nez, Mart&#x000ED;nez, Monserrat and Larregla.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Guerrero, Lacasa, Mart&#x000ED;nez, Mart&#x000ED;nez, Monserrat and Larregla</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license></permissions>
<abstract><p>Biodisinfection using fresh sheep manure in August is effective in controlling <italic>Phytophthora</italic> root rot in greenhouses in southeast Spain, but this is not the case after the beginning of September. The effectiveness of biodisinfection of new amendments has been evaluated beginning in October in sweet pepper greenhouses to control <italic>Phytophthora capsici</italic>. The amendments used were: T1: wheat husk &#x0002B; fresh sheep manure (FSM), 3.5 kg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>; T2: sunflower pellets 3.5 kg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>; T3: FSM: 3.5 kg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>; T4: Control. Temperatures above 40&#x000B0;C were obtained in some amendments; anoxic conditions were found in all amendments, and also a reduction of the viability of <italic>P. capsici</italic> oospores with respect to the control, as well as a higher yield. The contribution of fresh sheep manure to the amendments did not lead to an improvement in their effectiveness. Autumn biodisinfection under low temperature conditions using fresh organic amendments that enhance soil anaerobic conditions may be a promising strategy for the control of <italic>P. capsici</italic> in pepper greenhouses in southeastern Spain.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>soil disinfestation</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Capsicum annuum</italic></kwd>
<kwd>organic amendment</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Phytophthora</italic></kwd>
<kwd>oospores</kwd>
<kwd>greenhouse</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="1"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="49"/>
<page-count count="8"/>
<word-count count="6530"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Greenhouses of pepper (<italic>Capsicum annuum</italic> L.) in southeast Spain suffer from serious economic losses caused by the oomycetes <italic>Phytophthora capsici</italic> and <italic>P. nicotianae</italic>, which contaminate most of the region&#x00027;s soils (Lacasa et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2013</xref>). Both of these oomycetes limit the crop, leading to important losses in plants and harvests if preventive measures are not adopted before planting (Lacasa et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2010</xref>; Guerrero et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref>). Nowadays, <italic>P. nicotianae</italic> is the most prevalent (Lacasa et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2013</xref>; Blaya et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2014</xref>), favored by the climatic conditions in the greenhouses and farming practices. Chlamydospores and/or oospores may survive for up to 6 years (Erwin and Ribeiro, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1996</xref>). The main soil-borne pathogens of protected peppers are <italic>Phytophthora</italic> spp. and <italic>Meloidogyne incognita</italic> in addition to soil fatigue issues which are specific of this crop. The previous soil phytopathological problems are both caused by the repeated growing of pepper crops in the same soil for over 30 years (Guerrero et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Between 1982 and 2005, soil disinfestation with methyl bromide was the way to palliate the effects of <italic>Phytophthora</italic> root rot in more than 95% of the greenhouses (Lacasa et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2010</xref>). The mix of chloropicrin and 1,3-dichloropropene has replaced methyl bromide in over 70% of the surface area. Biodisinfection is used in 20% of the surface area, combining solarization with biofumigation (Lacasa et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2010</xref>; Guerrero et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref>).</p>
<p>The combination of solarization with biofumigation shows that the two methods have synergic effects (Katan, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2005</xref>). Sealing the soil with plastic produces the gas retention that occurs during organic matter decomposition (Bonanomi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2007</xref>; Oka, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2010</xref>). If saturation levels are reached when the soil is wetted, then the effects of anaerobiosis are also added and phytoparasites and pathogens are affected (Blok et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2000</xref>).</p>
<p>If water saturation levels are not reached, but organic amendments containing a high carbon content are used anaerobiosis occurs under the plastic during biodecomposition (anaerobic soil disinfestation, ASD) which affects the pathogens (Shennan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">2014</xref>; Rosskopf et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2015</xref>). During the degradation process of the organic matter, changes occur in the composition of the microbiota that confer a suppressive character against some pathogens (Mazzola, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2011</xref>; N&#x000FA;&#x000F1;ez-Zof&#x000ED;o et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2011</xref>; Mazzola and Manici, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2012</xref>; Mazzola et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2012</xref>). The suppressive effects and the anaerobiosis depend on the soil characteristics, the organic amendment used, the soil temperature, the characteristics of the microbiota and the disinfectant effectiveness or the pathogens susceptibility (Butler et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2014</xref>). The choice of the organic matter used in the biodisinfection is one of the determining elements for its efficacy. Bonanomi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2007</xref>) suggested that the application of specific organic matters: crop residues and organic wastes, compost and peat could be useful to increase soil suppressiveness. N&#x000FA;&#x000F1;ez-Zofio et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2013</xref>), found an effective biofumigant in beetroot stillage. Guerrero et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref>), checked the effect of <italic>Brassica carinata</italic> pellets on <italic>Meloidogyne incognita</italic> in pepper greenhouses in southeast Spain.</p>
<p>European Union restrictions on the use of chemical products, as well as the increase in the surface area dedicated to ecological agriculture, require the use of soil organic amendments for soilborne disease management. Biodisinfection using fresh sheep manure in August gives good results in controlling <italic>Phytophthora</italic> in greenhouses in southeast Spain, although this is not the case when the process is performed after the start of September (Guerrero et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2010</xref>). The majority of the greenhouses soils in the region are clay loam (Haplocalcids), basic pH, with an organic matter content between 1.5 and 2.5%. The climate is Mediterranean with marine influence, hot dry summers, and mild winters. The greenhouse pepper crop is planted in December-January, and finishes in August-September.</p>
<p>In order to fit the start of the biodisinfection to the end of the cropping season it is necessary to commence in October. Using the amendments that are typically used in August (fresh sheep manure), the biodisinfection does not reduce the levels of pathogens, and are thus unviable (Guerrero et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2010</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2013</xref>; Lacasa et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2010</xref>), so it is necessary to improve the biodisinfection effects by adding amendments that strengthen the anaerobic effect or increase soil temperature, both effects by the organic matter decomposition.</p>
<p>Moreover, the southeast of Spain is in a vulnerable zone due to nitrates (Directive 91/676/CEE, of 12 December, relating to the protection of waters against contamination produced by agricultural origin nitrates) which means that there are restrictions on the contribution of nitrogen. This premise severely limits the use of organic matter in the zone.</p>
<p>The objective of this study was to obtain biodisinfection amendments that are effective in controlling <italic>Phythophthora</italic> in pepper greenhouses with low temperatures whilst also reducing the amount of fresh organic amendments.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Experimental Design and Treatments</title>
<p>The field experiment was carried out over two crop seasons in an experimental sweet pepper greenhouse of 1,000 m<sup>2</sup>, at the experimental station of the IMIDA, located in the Campo de Cartagena, Region of Murcia (southeast Spain), where pepper has been grown periodically for over 20 years.</p>
<p>The clay loam soil was free from pathogens and was not previously disinfested.</p>
<p>The biodisinfection was performed in October for both seasons, starting on 2 October 2019 and 9 October 2020, respectively. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replicates and were repeated in the same plots in each of the two seasons. Each experimental unit consisted of a 60 m<sup>2</sup> plot. The treatments evaluated were: T1: wheat husk (Alimer SCoop)&#x0002B;fresh sheep manure (WH&#x0002B;FSM) 3.5 (2&#x0002B;1.5) kg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>; T2: sunflower pellets (Alimer SCoop) (S) 3.5 kg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>; T3: (FSM): 3.5 kg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>; T4: Control (non-amended and non-covered with plastic). Amendments and the non-amended control soil treatment were analyzed in the 2 years (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Composition of organic amendments and non-amended control soil treatment.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Wheat husk</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Sunflower pellets</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Fresh sheep manures</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Control</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total OM %</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.3 &#x000B1; 22.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.8 &#x000B1; 23.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52.23 &#x000B1; 3.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.82 &#x000B1; 0.65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total N g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.8 &#x000B1; 1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48.5 &#x000B1; 2.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.5 &#x000B1; 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7 &#x000B1; 0.39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C/N</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.4 &#x000B1; 14.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.5 &#x000B1; 14.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.9 &#x000B1; 1.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.54 &#x000B1; 0.81</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.2 &#x000B1; 01.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.4 &#x000B1; 3.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.95 &#x000B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0,11 &#x000B1; 0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">K<sub>2</sub>O g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.1 &#x000B1; 01.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.4 &#x000B1; 1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.98 &#x000B1; 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.18 &#x000B1; 0.13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.54 &#x000B1; 0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.47 &#x000B1; 2.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.50 &#x000B1; 0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.71 &#x000B1; 0.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Electrical conductivity (25&#x000B0;C) dS m<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.59 &#x000B1; 0.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.89 &#x000B1; 0.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.62 &#x000B1; 0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.99 &#x000B1; 0.54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Moisture%</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.12 &#x000B1; 0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.60 &#x000B1; 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.53 &#x000B1; 1.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42,45 &#x000B1; 1.07</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Values are the mean of two replicates corresponding to the 2 years &#x000B1; standard errors</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The amendments were applied and plots were rototilled to a depth of 25&#x02013;30 cm. The soil was irrigated using a drip irrigation system using 3 L h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> emitters spaced 0.40 &#x000D7; 0.60 m for 4 h on 2 consecutive days. Amended soil was covered with a 0.05 mm-thick transparent polyethylene film. The plastic was maintained for 6 weeks. The &#x0201C;Beniel&#x0201D; (Syngenta Seeds) pepper cultivar was planted in December at the habitual density of the zone: 1 m separation between rows and 0.4 m between plants in the same row (2.5 plants m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Inoculum Production</title>
<p>The inoculum was obtained from a <italic>P. capsici</italic> isolate from pepper plants that presented symptoms and was conserved in the IMIDA mycology collection in PDA medium. When this isolate was inoculated into healthy pepper plants, it showed to be aggressive and maintained its pathogenicity. The isolate grew in controlled conditions at 25&#x000B0;C for 3 weeks until it reached the edge of a 9 mm diameter Petri dish. A micellar solution with a concentration of 1 &#x000D7; 10<sup>3</sup> CFU mL<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> was obtained by grinding the content of one dish in 100 mL of distilled sterile water and subsequent adjustment by dilution and direct count using a Neubauer counting chamber. A volume of 100 mL of soil, previously autoclaved at 120&#x000B0;C for 1 h on 2 consecutive days, was inoculated with 1 mL of micellar solution, and was placed inside muslin forming a bag. In three different points of each treatment replicate plot, soil inoculated bags were buried at 15 and 30 cm soil depth.</p>
<p>Oospores of <italic>P. capsici</italic> were produced <italic>in vitro</italic> by pairing isolates of different mating types on soft pea agar following N&#x000FA;&#x000F1;ez-Zofio (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2011</xref>). Oospores embedded in nylon mesh were buried at 15 and 30 cm soil depth in three different points of each treatment replicate plot.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Variables Measured</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>- Ambient greenhouse temperature and soil temperatures in one replicate plot of each treatment at 15 and 30 cm depth were registered with 12-bit S-TMB-M017 temperature Hobo probes (accuracy &#x0003C; 0.2&#x000B0;C) connected to an H21-002 Hobo datalogger. Readings were taken every 30 min throughout the biodisinfection treatment.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>- Soil oxygen percentage content in one replicate plot of each treatment at 15 cm depth was registered with SO-200 galvanic cell type oxygen Apogee-Instruments probes (accuracy &#x0003C; 0.02% O<sub>2</sub>) buried at a depth of 15 cm connected to an H22-001 Hobo datalogger. Readings were taken every 30 min throughout the biodisinfection treatment.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>- Viability of <italic>P. capsici</italic> oospores. First season. After 6 weeks of biodisinfection treatment, <italic>P. capsici</italic> oospore viability was determined using the plasmolysis method (Jiang and Erwin, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">1990</xref>), adapted by N&#x000FA;&#x000F1;ez-Zofio et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2013</xref>).</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>- Infectivity of <italic>P. capsici</italic> inoculum soil buried. Second season. After biodisinfection the bag with inoculated soil were removed, and the soil was placed in 150 mL pots into which &#x0201C;Lamuyo&#x0201D; cultivar (Clause Seeds) sensitive pepper plants were transplanted when they had four true leaves. The potted plants (three points for each treatment in each of the three replicate plots) were kept for 12 weeks in a chamber at 25&#x000B0;C and a relative humidity of 60&#x02013;70% with 14:10 h light: darkness of photoperiod and were kept. Notes were taken on the presence of yellowing, wilting or death once per week and those that presented symptoms were analyzed in PDA medium. As plants died, damaged tissue was washed with tap water and fragments of roots and crown were placed on potato dextrose agar and on PARPH (Jeffers and Martin, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">1986</xref>) medium and incubated at 25&#x000B0;C for 4&#x02013;6 days. After that, the fungus was identified using microscopic observation. At the end of the bioassay, the plant roots were examined to detect symptoms of the disease. The results of infectivity were expressed as a percentage of diseased plants (Coelho et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2000</xref>; Lacasa et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2015</xref>).</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>- Marketable yield. Each 15 days, from April through to August in each season, the production of the plants was harvested and weighed separately for each treatment replicate plot. This variable was expressed in kg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>. Each replicate plot consisted of two rows and 45 plants were harvested from each row.</p></list-item>
</list></sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>The effects of treatments were studied using two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Software Statgraphics Centurion 16. In order to fulfill the assumptions of analysis of variance (homocedasticity and normality), the infectivity bioassay data were transformed using arcsine (&#x0221A;x/n), where x = total number of dead plants and <italic>n</italic> = total number of plants. Oospores viability data were transformed using arcsine (&#x0221A;x/n), where x=total number of oospores survival and <italic>n</italic> = total number of oospores. Data on crop yield were transformed using log transformation log (x&#x0002B;1), where x = total yield. Means for significant main effects (biodisinfection treatment, soil depth) and all pairwise differences among least squares means within the biodisinfection treatment &#x000D7; soil depth interaction were separated by Fisher&#x00027;s LSD test (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05).</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Soil Temperatures</title>
<p>Temperatures exceeding 38&#x000B0;C were reached in the amendments consisting of wheat husk&#x0002B;fresh sheep manure, in the sunflower pellets, and fresh sheep manure, at 15 cm in the first season. In the second season, although the largest number of hours was accumulated in the order of 33&#x000B0;C, the soil was subjected to temperatures of up to 37&#x000B0;C for certain periods of time at both soil depths, 15 and 30 cm. In the second season, the lowest number of accumulated hours above 33&#x000B0;C was found in the non-treated control. There were no temperatures exceeding 42&#x000B0;C in any of the treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). The mean ambient greenhouse temperature ranged from 13.6 to 31.8&#x000B0;C in the first season, and from 15.9 to 44.3&#x000B0;C in the second.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Number of cumulative hours in each crop cycle at 15 and 30 cm soil depth within different temperature ranges.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>First season</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Second season</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Treatment</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Depth (cm)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>34&#x02013;37&#x000B0;C</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>38&#x02013;41&#x000B0;C</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>34&#x02013;37&#x000B0;C</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>38&#x02013;41&#x000B0;C</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wheat husk &#x0002B; Fresh sheep manures</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">120</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sunflower pellets</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fresh sheep manures</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">223</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">147</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>First and second season</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>There was a period of anoxia during the biodisinfection process in both seasons in all the biodisinfection treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Variations were found among the treatments and between years for the same treatment. In WH&#x0002B;FSM, at least 35.5% of the disinfestation time the O<sub>2</sub> level was below 2% in the first year, whilst in the second year this was the case 84.4% of the time. In FSM at least 64.4% of the time the oxygen levels were below 2%, whilst in the second year this occurred 57.7% of the time. In the first year the time that the oxygen level was below 2% in S and FSM was similar (at least 64.4%) whilst in WH&#x0002B;FSM the figure was, of at least 35.5%. In the second year, the oxygen level remained below 2% for 84.4% of the biodisinfection time in both S and WH&#x0002B;FSM, whilst in FSM the proportion of biodisinfection time with oxygen levels below 2% was at least 57.7%.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Evolution of the percentage of oxygen in each treatment during the biodisinfestation process started in October at 15 cm depth. Abscisa axis: days from the start of the biodisinfestation. First and second seasons.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fsufs-05-659290-g0001.tif"/>
</fig></sec>
<sec>
<title>Effect of Treatments on <italic>P. capsici</italic> Oospore Viability</title>
<sec>
<title>First Season</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref> shows the viability of the oospores in each treatment and at each depth. The depth had an influence on oospore viability. At 15 cm the oospore viability was reduced in all the treatments, except for the control, while at 30 cm the reduction in viability was greater in the WH&#x0002B;FSM and S treatments than in the FSM. Biodisinfection reduced the viability of the oospores buried in the amendments with FSM as well as in those that did not contain it [<italic>F</italic><sub>(3,11) &#x0003D;</sub> 5.69; <italic>p</italic> = 0.0028 at 15 cm; <italic>F</italic><sub>(3,11)</sub> = 2.92; <italic>p</italic> = 0.004 at 30 cm].</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Effect of biodisinfection treatments on <italic>P. capsici</italic> oospore viability percentage at two different soil depths (15 and 30 cm) after 6 weeks of exposition.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Biodisinfection treatment</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>15 cm</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>30 cm</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wheat husk &#x0002B; Fresh sheep manure</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.89 &#x000B1; 3.40bA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.34 &#x000B1; 2.23bA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sunflower pellets</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.46 &#x000B1; 4.93bA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.66 &#x000B1; 4.5bA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fresh sheep manure</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.29 &#x000B1; 2.91bB</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.88 &#x000B1; 3.98aA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.8 &#x000B1; 6.71aA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.11 &#x000B1; 2.85abB</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>x = mean percentage of viable oospores. Mean values (n = 12) &#x000B1; standard deviation. Data were transformed using arcsine (&#x0221A;x&#x0002B;0.5) where x= mean percentage of viable oospores in each biodisinfection treatment at each soil depth</italic>.</p>
<p><italic>The significant differences among biodisinfection treatments and each soil depth at 6 weeks were tested by two-way ANOVA</italic>.</p>
<p><italic>Values in the same column followed by a different lower-case letter indicate significant differences between biodisinfection treatments within a given soil depth and upper-case letters compare soil depths for a given biodisinfection treatment based on the Fisher&#x00027;s LSD test (p &#x0003C; 0.05) within the interaction of biodisinfection and soil depth treatments. When differences were non-significant, letters were omitted</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap></sec></sec>
<sec>
<title>Effect of Treatments on Infectivity of Introduced Soil Inoculum of <italic>P. capsici</italic></title>
<sec>
<title>Second Season</title>
<p>The results obtained in the bioassay were different at 15 cm and 30 cm soil depth (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>). There were differences between the percentage of dead pepper plants in each treatment and the control at 15 cm (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>). The percentage of dead plants in the bioassay at 30 cm differed between the FSM and the control, although this was not the case for the other two amendments [<italic>F</italic><sub>(3,11)</sub> = 1.07; <italic>p</italic> = 0.040 at 15 cm; <italic>F</italic><sub>(3,11)</sub>= 3.30; <italic>p</italic> = 0.047 at 30 cm].</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p>Infectivity of introduced soil inoculum of <italic>Phytophthora capsici</italic> at 15 and 30 cm depth in bioassays with sweet pepper variety &#x0201C;Lamuyo&#x0201D; plants expressed as percentage of dead plants during bioassays in each treatment.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Treatment</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>15 cm</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>30 cm</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wheat husk &#x0002B; Fresh sheep manures</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">77.7&#x000B1; 12 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">77.7&#x000B1; 12 ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sunflower pellets</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">77.7&#x000B1; 19 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">88.9 &#x000B1; 19 ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fresh sheep manures</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">77.7 &#x000B1; 18 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100.0 &#x000B1; 0 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.4 &#x000B1; 19 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.6 &#x000B1; 3 b</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Mean values (n = 12) &#x000B1; standard deviation. Data were transformed using arcsine (&#x0221A;x&#x0002B;0.5) where x = mean percentage of lived plants at each soil depth</italic>.</p>
<p><italic>Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Fisher&#x00027;s LSD (p &#x0003C; 0.05)</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap></sec></sec>
<sec>
<title>Effect of Treatments on Marketable Yield</title>
<p>Yields were significantly higher in the biodisinfested plots than in the control. The effect of biodisinfection treatments on marketable yield was significant in the first season [<italic>F</italic><sub>(3,15)</sub> = 4.16; <italic>p</italic> = 0.009], and in the second season [<italic>F</italic><sub>(3,15)</sub> = 0.65; <italic>p</italic> = 0.6028] (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>). The non-contribution of FSM had no negative influence on yield in the amendment composed of sunflower pellets. This fact increases the interest of the amendment, due to the situation of greenhouses in the zone subjected to restrictions in the N application with origin on livestock manures due to Nitrates Directive implementation.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption><p>Marketable yield (kg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>) in each crop cycle.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Treatment</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>1st season</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>2nd season</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wheat husk &#x0002B; Fresh sheep manures</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.43 &#x000B1; 1.06 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.86 &#x000B1; 1.30 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sunflower pellets</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.72 &#x000B1; 1.79 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.96 &#x000B1; 0.80 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fresh sheep manures</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.21 &#x000B1; 1.17 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.30 &#x000B1; 1.20 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.23 &#x000B1; 0.44 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.00 &#x000B1; 0.39 b</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Mean values (n = 4) &#x000B1; standard deviation. Data were transformed using log (x&#x0002B;1), where x = total yield. Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Fisher&#x00027;s LSD (p &#x0003C; 0.05)</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In our trial, the temperatures obtained during the biodisinfection carried out in October with the amendments of wheat husk&#x0002B;fresh sheep manure, sunflower pellets, and fresh sheep manure exceeded 38&#x000B0;C in the first season, varying between 51 and 57 h, but no in the second. At both seasons soil temperatures accumulated in October during the biodisinfection in the greenhouse were considerably lower than those obtained for the month of August in the same zone (Guerrero et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2019</xref>). Etxeberria et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2011</xref>) found that for 1,680 h at 15&#x02013;35&#x000B0;C, the survival of the oospores ranged between 88 and 36%. The oospore viability in the two seasons was reduced by the presence of minimum temperatures above those reported by Etxeberria et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2011</xref>). The results also concur with those obtained by Lacasa et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2015</xref>) in which biodisinfection in spring with <italic>Sinapis alba</italic> fresh green manure did reduce the infectivity of <italic>Phytophthora nicotianae</italic> chlamydospores introduced inoculum (Gandariasbeitia et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2019</xref>). The infectivity of the surviving inoculum corresponded to an insufficient reduction of the inoculum buried in the bags. Coelho et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2000</xref>) considered that inoculum levels in excess of 1 propagule per gram of soil are necessary in order to detect the surviving inoculum using plant indicators in bioassays.</p>
<p>The biodisinfection with the assayed amendments induce anoxia in the soil for several weeks, which is one of the factors indicated for Gamliel et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2000</xref>) as cause of the decrease in the pathogen populations and of the efficacy of the disinfestation. In the first season, the level of oxygen in the soil was below 2% for more than 64% of the disinfestation time for S and FSM treatments, and over 35% of the time in WH &#x0002B; FSM. In the second season, the corresponding time was more than 57% in FSM and over 84% in S and for WH &#x0002B; FMS. The production of sporangia and the mycelial growth of several species of <italic>Phytophthora</italic> (including <italic>P. capsici</italic>) was considerably lower when the oxygen level was at 1% of oxygen in the crop solution. Below 2.5% of oxygen, the formation of sporangia is reduced and also the mycelial development of <italic>P. cinnamomi</italic>, affecting the viability of the inoculum (Davison and Tay, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">1987</xref>).</p>
<p>The efficacy of the biodisinfection when temperatures are low improves with the contribution of amendments that are rich in organic matter or by increasing the amount of carbon that is applied to the soil. The contribution of 4 mg C g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of soil has been recommended to improve the efficacy of ASD at low temperatures (Butler et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2014</xref>; Rosskopf et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2015</xref>). It is recommended that the carbon of the organic amendment should be labile, so that it can easily and rapidly be degraded by the soil microorganisms and create conditions for persistent anaerobiosis. Additionally, an adequate ratio of C/N must be considered so that, on the one hand, the N that is applied is enough so that N is not immobilized by the soil microorganisms in the degradation/mineralization of the organic amendments and, at the same time, there is not a potentially leachable excess of N. In our trials, the amendments presented a balanced composition, and ratios of C/N within the limits that are considered as adequate for biodisinfection and the generation of hypoxia.</p>
<p>The efficacy or failure of soil biodisinfection may be due to the soil characteristics, the degree of moistening, the electrical conductivity, the characteristics of the plastic, and the period of solarization (Chellemi, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2002</xref>). The temperate-humid climate has obstructed the application of biosolarization, very extended in Mediterranean horticultural areas such as South-eastern Spain. However, previous experimentation with different amendments, doses and application times compatible with crop cycles showed the applicability of these practices in the humid temperate climate region of Northern Spain (Ojinaga et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2020</xref>).</p>
<p>In the north of Spain, the survival of oospores of <italic>P. capsici</italic> was reduced at 15 and 30 cm when the biodisinfection was applied in August with both fresh and semi-composted manure (N&#x000FA;&#x000F1;ez-Zof&#x000ED;o et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2012</xref>). Using rice bran, rapeseed cake, or grape pomace as the carbon source, Serrano-P&#x000E9;rez et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2017</xref>) obtained significant reductions in chlamydospores viability and inoculum infectivity of pepper plants by <italic>P. nicotianae</italic>, when biodisinfection was carried out in low temperature open air conditions of the spring season in south western Spain.</p>
<p>Despite the low disinfectant efficacy assessed by the reduction in the survival of <italic>P. capsici</italic> oospores in sub-optimal conditions for solarization (absence of thermal inactivation), improvements were observed in the suppressiveness and in the chemical, physical and biological soil properties when the organic amendments were applied in biodisinfection, which caused a reduction of crop diseases and a yield increase (N&#x000FA;&#x000F1;ez-Zof&#x000ED;o et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2012</xref>; Rosskopf et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2015</xref>; Gandariasbeitia et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2019</xref>). It was concluded that repeated biodisinfection for the control of <italic>Phytophthora</italic> root and crown rot in protected pepper crops located in temperate climate regions can improve soil quality and suppressiveness, as well as enabling reduced doses of the organic amendment needed for biodisinfection. However, this disinfestant efficacy worsened when the biodisinfection was performed in March (Arriaga et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2011</xref>), and also when it was carried out in September (N&#x000FA;&#x000F1;ez-Zof&#x000ED;o et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2011</xref>).</p>
<p>One strategy employed when biodisinfection fails due to the climate or crop cycles is to turn to anaerobic disinfection. This strategy has been applied in limiting solarization conditions in Japan (Shinmura, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2000</xref>; Momma et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2005</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2006</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2010</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2011</xref>; Katase et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2009</xref>) and also in the Netherlands (Blok et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2000</xref>; Agtmaal et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2015</xref>).</p>
<p>The effect of the application of organic matter produced a yield increase in both seasons. Although there was no naturally occurring presence of pathogens, the increased yield in the biodisinfested plots might be explained by the reduction of soil fatigue in the crop. The fatigue accumulated in greenhouses used for pepper monocropping is highly specific toward pepper (Guerrero et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2014</xref>). The greenhouse assayed in this study fits the conditions of pepper monocropping. Biodisinfection with fresh sheep manure of greenhouses used to grow pepper crops, improved the physical and chemical characteristics of the soil (Fern&#x000E1;ndez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2005</xref>). The application of wood waste and sunflower husk biochar improved soil porosity and the structural stability of soil aggregates (Soko&#x00142;owska et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2020</xref>). Improvement of soil water infiltration, soil drainage, and roots aeration have been associated with a better control of crop root rot caused by soilborne pathogenic species of <italic>Phytophthora</italic> (Ristaino, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">1991</xref>).</p>
<p>The principal cause of this fatigue is considered to be biotic and related with the extent to which the soils are contaminated with <italic>Fusarium</italic> sp. (Mart&#x000ED;nez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2011</xref>). It is additionally known that the fatigue accumulated in greenhouses used for pepper monocropping is highly specific toward pepper (Guerrero et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2014</xref>). In soils contaminated by <italic>Fusarium</italic> spp. and <italic>Phytophthora</italic> spp., Song et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2020a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">b</xref>) obtained a significant reduction in the incidence of <italic>Fusarium</italic> and <italic>Phytophthora</italic> in strawberry crops in conditions of biodisinfection with chicken manure or with maltose as carbon sources at 28&#x000B0;C and covering the soil with total impermeable film. They also observed a yield improvement related with the increase of soil available nutrients after the biodisinfection treatment.</p>
<p>In those plots where FSM was not used in this study, the yields were similar to those in which it had been used. This fact is of great interest since the cropping zone of Southeast Spain is subject to organic matter restrictions. Moreover, it is known that the incorporation of organic correctives improves soil properties and fertility, as reported by Bonanomi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2007</xref>).</p>
<p>The results obtained with the carbon-rich and balanced amendments and in time periods that are compatible with the pepper crop cycle in greenhouses in southeast Spain, showed a yield improvement. This increased yield may also be due to the effect highlighted by N&#x000FA;&#x000F1;ez-Zof&#x000ED;o et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2011</xref>) that repeated biodisinfection treatments in temperate climate areas improve soil suppressiveness and quality. This would enable growers to extend the crop cycle and thereby the corresponding economic benefit.</p>
<p>In conclusion, using the specific organic amendments, significant reductions were obtained in the viability of the inoculum resting structures of <italic>P. capsici</italic> as well as increases in the marketable yield, when biodisinfection is performed on dates that are compatible with the pepper growing cycle in the Campo de Cartagena. This way of soil disinfestation is recommendable in the context of the strategies of sustainable integrated production.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability-statement" id="s5">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.</p></sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>MG designed the experiment and wrote the original draft. CL, VM, MM, and AM supervised the experiment and contributed to the data. SL revised the manuscript. All authors approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Agtmaal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Os</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gera Hol</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hundscheid</surname> <given-names>M. P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Runia</surname> <given-names>W. T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Legacy effects of anaerobic soil disinfestation on soil bacterial community composition and production of pathogensuppressing volatiles</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol</source>. <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>701</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2015.00701</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26217330</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arriaga</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>N&#x000FA;&#x000F1;ez-Zof&#x000ED;o</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larregla</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Merino</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Gaseous emissions from soil biodisinfection by animal manure on a greenhouse pepper crop</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot</source>. <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>412</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>419</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2010.12.012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blaya</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pascual</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Characterization of <italic>Phytophthora nicotianae</italic> isolates in south-east Spain and their detection and quantification through a real-time TaqMan PCR</article-title>. <source>J. Sci. Food Agric</source>. <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>1243</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1251</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.6813</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blok</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lamers</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Termorshuizen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bollen</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Control of soilborne plant pathogens by incorporating fresh organic amendments followed by tarping</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>253</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>259</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.3.253</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18944617</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bonanomi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antignani</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pane</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scala</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Suppression of soilborne fungal diseases with organic amendments</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Pathol</source>. 89, 311&#x02013;324. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/41998410">https://www.jstor.org/stable/41998410</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Butler</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kokalis-Burelle</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Albano</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCollum</surname> <given-names>T. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muramoto</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shennan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) combined with soil solarization as a methyl bromide alternative: vegetable crop performance and soil nutrient dynamics</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>378</volume>, <fpage>365</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>381</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-014-2030-z</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Butler</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kokalis-Burelle</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muramoto</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shennan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCollum</surname> <given-names>T. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosskopf</surname> <given-names>E. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Impact of anaerobic soil disinfestation combined with soil solarization on plant-parasitic nematodes and introduced inoculum of soilborne plant pathogens in raised-bed vegetable production</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>40</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2012.03.019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chellemi</surname> <given-names>D. O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Nonchemical management of soilborne pests in fresh market vegetable production systems</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>1367</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1372</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.12.1367</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18943895</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Coelho</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chellemi</surname> <given-names>D. O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Thermal inactivation of <italic>Phytophthora nicotianae</italic></article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>1089</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1097</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.10.1089</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davison</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tay</surname> <given-names>F. C. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>The effect of waterlogging on infection of <italic>Eucalyptus marginata</italic> seedlings by <italic>Phytophthora cinnamomi</italic></article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>585</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>594</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00896.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Erwin</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ribeiro</surname> <given-names>O. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Morphology and identification of <italic>Phytophthora</italic> species,</article-title> in <source>Phytophthora Diseases Worldwide</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Erwin</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ribeiro</surname> <given-names>O. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Saint Paul, MN</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>American Phytopathological Society Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>96</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>144</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Etxeberria</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mendarte</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larregla</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Thermal inactivation of <italic>Phytophthora</italic> capsici oospores</article-title>. <source>Rev. Iberoam Micol.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>83</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>90</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.riam.2011.01.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21352945</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fern&#x000E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guerrero</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ros</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bello</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Effects of biofumigation plus solarization on soil fertility. Industrial crops and rural development,</article-title> in <source>Proceedings of the Annual Meeting Association for the Advancement of Industrial Crops 17-21 September</source> (<publisher-loc>Murcia</publisher-loc>), <fpage>229</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>336</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gamliel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Austerweil</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kitzman</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Non chemical approach to soilborne pest management organic amendments</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>847</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>853</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00112-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gandariasbeitia</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ojinaga</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Orbegozo</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ortiz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nu&#x000F1;ez-Zof&#x000ED;o</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mendarte</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Winter biodisinfestation with Brassica green manure is a promising management strategy for <italic>Phytophthora capsici</italic> control of protected pepper crops in humid temperate climate regions of Northern Spain</article-title>. <source>Span. J. Agric. Res</source>. <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>e1005</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5424/sjar/2019171-13808</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guerrero</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez-Lluch</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larregla</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Soil biosolarization for <italic>Verticillium dahliae</italic> and <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic> control in artichoke crops in southeastern Spain</article-title>. <source>Span. J. Agric. Res</source> <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>e1002</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5424/sjar/2019171-13666</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guerrero</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guirao</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tello</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Soil fatigue and its specificity towards pepper plants in greenhouses</article-title>. <source>Span. J. Agric. Res</source>. <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>644</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>652</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5424/sjar/2014123-5701</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guerrero</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hern&#x000E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of repeated biodisinfestation using <italic>Brassica carinata</italic> pellets to control <italic>Meloidogyne incognita</italic> in protected pepper crops</article-title>. <source>Span. J. Agric. Res.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>485</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>493</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5424/sjar/2013112-3275</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guerrero</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ros</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fern&#x000E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Effect of biosolarization using pellets of <italic>Brassica carinata</italic> on soilborne pathogens in protected pepper crops</article-title>. <source>Acta Hortic</source>. <volume>883</volume>, <fpage>337</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>334</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.883.42</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jeffers</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Comparison of two media selective for <italic>Phytophthora</italic> and <italic>Pythium</italic> species</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis</source>. <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>1038</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1043</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PD-70-1038</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Erwin</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Morphology, plasmolysis and tetrazolium bromide stainas criteria for determining viability of <italic>Phytophthora</italic> oospores</article-title>. <source>Mycologia</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>107</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>113</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00275514.1990.12025847</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Katan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Soil disinfestation: one minute before Methyl Bromide phase out. Procedures of VIth International Symposium on Chemical and Non-Chemical Soil and Substrate Disinfestation</article-title>. <source>Acta Hortic.</source> <volume>698</volume>, <fpage>19</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>25</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.698.1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Katase</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kubo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ushio</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ootsuka</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takeuchi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mizukubo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Nematicidal activity of volatile fatty acids generated from wheat bran in reductive soil disinfestation</article-title>. <source>Jpn. J. Nematol</source>. <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>62</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3725/jjn.39.53</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guerrero</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ros</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fern&#x000E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Efficacy of biosolarization with sugar beet vinasses for soil disinfestation in pepper greenhouses</article-title>. <source>Acta Hortic</source>. <volume>883</volume>, <fpage>345</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>352</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.883.43</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hern&#x000E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ros</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guerrero</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Surival reduction of <italic>Phytophthora</italic> capsici oospores and <italic>P. nicotianae</italic> chlamydospores with Brassica green manures combined with solarization</article-title>. <source>Sci Hortic</source>. <volume>197</volume>, <fpage>07</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>618</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2015.10.024</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tello</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title><italic>Phytophthora</italic> en los invernaderos de pimiento del Campo de Cartagena (Murcia) <italic>Agroecologia</italic></article-title> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>18</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>19</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tello</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <source>Ecolog</source>&#x000ED;<italic>a de la Microbiota F&#x000FA;ngica de los Suelos de los Invernaderos de Pimiento y su Inter&#x000E9;s Agron&#x000F3;mico</italic>. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid. ISBN: 978-84-491-0987-4.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bielza</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tello</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Effect of biofumigation with manure amendments and repeated biosolarization on <italic>Fusarium</italic> densities in pepper crops</article-title>. <source>J. Indust. Microbiol. Biotechnol</source>. <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10295-010-0826-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20820866</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mazzola</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Potential of biofumigation of soilborne pest control in strawberry,</article-title> in <source>Proceedings of Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions</source> (<publisher-loc>San Diego, CA</publisher-loc>), <fpage>41</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>47</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mazzola</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manici</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Apple replant disease: role of microbial ecology in cause and control</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol</source>. <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>45</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>65</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-173005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22559069</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mazzola</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shennan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muramoto</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Application sequence and soil biology influence anaerobic soil disinfestation induced disease suppression,</article-title> in <source>Proceedings of the 2012 Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions</source> (<publisher-loc>Orlando</publisher-loc>) <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Momma</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kobara</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Momma</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Fe2&#x0002B; and Mn2&#x0002B;, potential agents to induce suppression of <italic>Fusarium oxysporum</italic> for biological soil disinfestation</article-title>. <source>J. Gen. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>331</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>335</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10327-011-0336-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Momma</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Momma</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kobara</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Biological soil disinfestation using ethanol: effect on <italic>Fusarium oxysporum</italic> f. sp. lycopersici and soil microorganisms</article-title>. <source>J. Gen. Plant Pathol</source>. <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>336</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>344</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10327-010-0252-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Momma</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Usami</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amemiya</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shishido</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Factors involved in the suppression of <italic>Fusarium oxysporum</italic> f. <italic>sp. lycopersici</italic> by soil reduction</article-title>. <source>Soil Microorg.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>27</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>33</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18946/jssm.59.1_27</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Momma</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamamoto</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simandi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shishido</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Role of organic acids in the mechanisms of biological soil disinfestation (BSD)</article-title>. <source>J. Gen. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>247</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>252</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10327-006-0274-z</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>N&#x000FA;&#x000F1;ez-Zofio</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <source>Evaluaci&#x000F3;n de la biodesinfecci&#x000F3;n para el control de Phytophthora capsici en el cultivo de pimiento en invernadero</source> (Tesis doctoral). Universidad del Pa&#x000ED;s Vasco - Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Espa&#x000F1;a,305.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>N&#x000FA;&#x000F1;ez-Zof&#x000ED;o</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larregla</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garbisu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Application of organic amendments followed by soil plastic mulching reduces the incidence of <italic>Phytophthora capsici</italic> in pepper crops under temperate climate</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1563</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1572</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2011.08.020</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>N&#x000FA;&#x000F1;ez-Zof&#x000ED;o</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larregla</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garbisu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Repeated biodisinfection controls the incidence of <italic>Phytophthor</italic>a root and crown rot of pepper while improving soil quality</article-title>. <source>Span. J. Agric. Res</source>. <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>794</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>805</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5424/sjar/2012103-571-11</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>N&#x000FA;&#x000F1;ez-Zofio</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larregla</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garbisu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guerrero</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Application of sugar beet vinasse followed by solarization reduces the incidence of <italic>Meloidogyne incognita</italic> in pepper crops while improving soilquality</article-title>. <source>Phytoparasitica</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>181</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>191</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12600-012-0277-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ojinaga</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gandariasbeitia</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Orbegozo</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ort&#x000ED;z</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guerrero</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lacasa</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Biodisinfestation for <italic>Meloidogyne</italic> and <italic>Verticillium</italic> control in commercial protected crops in the Basque Country Atlantic area (northern Spain)</article-title>. <source>Acta Hortic.</source> <volume>1270</volume>, <fpage>327</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>336</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1270.40</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oka</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms of nematode suppression by organic soil amendments: a review</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>101</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>115</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.11.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ristaino</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Influence of rainfall, drip irrigation, and inoculum density on the development of <italic>Phytophthora</italic> root and crown rot epidemics and yield in bell pepper</article-title>. <source>Am. Phytopathol. Soc</source>. <volume>81</volume>:<fpage>922</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rosskopf</surname> <given-names>E. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Serrano-P&#x000E9;rez</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shrestha</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodr&#x000ED;guez-Molina</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Anaerobic soil disinfestation and soilborne pest management,</article-title> in <source>Organic Amendments and Soil Suppressiveness in Plant Disease Management</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Meghvansi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Varma</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>277</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>305</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Serrano-P&#x000E9;rez</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosskopf</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Santiago</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>del Carmen Rodr&#x000ED;guez-Molina</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Anaerobic soil disinfestation reduces survival and infectivity of <italic>Phytophthora nicotianae</italic> chlamydospores in pepper</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>215</volume>, <fpage>38</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>48</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2016.12.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shennan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mazzola</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosskopf</surname> <given-names>E. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kokalis-Burelle</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Momma</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Butler</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Anaerobic soil disinfestation for soil borne disease control in strawberry and vegetable systems: current knowledge and future directions</article-title>. <source>VIII Int. Symp. Chem. Non Chem. Soil Subst. Disinfest</source><volume>1044</volume>, <fpage>165</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>175</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1044.20</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shinmura</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Causal agent and control of root rot of Welsh onion</article-title>. <source>PSJ Soilborne Dis.Workshop Rep</source>. <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>133</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>143</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soko&#x00142;owska</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Szewczuk-Karpisz</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Turski</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomczyk</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cybulak</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skic</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of wood waste and sunflower husk biochar on tensile strength and porosity of dystric Cambisol artificial aggregates</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>244</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy10020244</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Massart</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eck</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berhal</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020a</year>). <article-title>Composted chicken manure for anaerobic soil disinfestation increased the strawberry yield and shifted the soil microbial communities</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>6313</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su12166313</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020b</year>). <article-title>Maltose and totally impermeable film enhanced suppression of anaerobic soil disinfestation on soilborne pathogens and increased strawberry yield</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>5456</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su12135456</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure"><p><bold>Funding.</bold> This work has been supported by project FEDER1420-31.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>