Front. Sustain. Frontiers in Sustainability Front. Sustain. 2673-4524 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/frsus.2022.862853 Sustainability Correction Corrigendum: Techno-Economic Assessment of Thermally Integrated Co-Electrolysis and Methanation for Industrial Closed Carbon Cycles Böhm Hans 1 * Lehner Markus 2 Kienberger Thomas 3 1Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität, Linz, Austria 2Montanuniversität Leoben, Chair of Process Technology and Industrial Environmental Protection, Leoben, Austria 3Montanuniversität Leoben, Chair of Energy Network Technology, Leoben, Austria

Edited and reviewed by: Stefano Stendardo, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Italy

 *Correspondence: Hans Böhm boehm@energieinstitut-linz.at

This article was submitted to Circular Economy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Sustainability

 22 03 2022 2022 3 862853 26 01 2022 28 02 2022 Copyright © 2022 Böhm, Lehner and Kienberger. 2022 Böhm, Lehner and Kienberger

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on Techno-Economic Assessment of Thermally Integrated Co-Electrolysis and Methanation for Industrial Closed Carbon Cycles by Böhm, H., Lehner, M., and Kienberger, T. (2021). Front. Sustain. 2:726332. doi: 10.3389/frsus.2021.726332 co-electrolysis methanation power-to-gas techno-economy oxygen utilization CCU cement industry steel industry

In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 7 as published. The results shown in the graph for the cement industry scenario do not represent the actual results, which were discussed in the paper. The corrected Figure 7 appears below.

SNG generation costs for different plant capacities and years of implementation. (A) steel industry scenario, (B) cement industry scenario.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.