<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Surg.</journal-id><journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Surgery</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Surg.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-875X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsurg.2025.1734652</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Impact of prolonged postoperative antibiotic administration on postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>Go Woon</given-names></name><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing</role></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>Nahyeon</given-names></name><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kuk</surname><given-names>Jung Chul</given-names></name><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Lim</surname><given-names>Dae Ro</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">&#x002A;</xref><uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3258640/overview"/><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Shin</surname><given-names>Eung Jin</given-names></name><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><institution>Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital</institution>, <city>Bucheon</city>, <country country="">Republic of Korea</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1"><label>&#x002A;</label><bold>Correspondence:</bold> Dae Ro Lim <email xlink:href="mailto:limdaero@schmc.ac.kr">limdaero@schmc.ac.kr</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-01-12"><day>12</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date>
<volume>12</volume><elocation-id>1734652</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></date>
<date date-type="rev-recd"><day>07</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; 2026 Park, Park, Kuk, Lim and Shin.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Park, Park, Kuk, Lim and Shin</copyright-holder><license><ali:license_ref start_date="2026-01-12">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract><sec><title>Propose</title>
<p>The purpose of this study was to investigate whether prolonged antibiotic usage beyond conventional practices could impact the incidence of postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.</p>
</sec><sec><title>Materials and methods</title>
<p>Between January 2016 and December 2022, a total of 292 patients aged over 70 years who underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer were identified from a retrospective database. The study population was divided into two groups: the POD&#x0023;1 group, consisting of patients who received postoperative antibiotics for 1 day (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;214), and the POD&#x0023;3 group, comprising patients who received postoperative antibiotics for at least 3 days (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;78).</p>
</sec><sec><title>Results</title>
<p>A significant difference between two groups was observed in the rates of total postoperative complications, infection-related complications and antibiotic reuse. In the POD&#x0023;1 group, complications occurred at a rate of 25.7&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;55), while the POD&#x0023;3 group showed a lower complication rate of 14.1&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;11) (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.036). The infection-related complications such as anastomotic leakage, wound infection, pneumonia occurred at a rate of 20.1&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;43) in POD&#x0023;1 group compared to 5.1&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;4) in POD&#x0023;3 group (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.002). The antibiotic re-use rate was 22.4&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;48) in the POD&#x0023;1 group and 11.5&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;9) in the POD&#x0023;3 group (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.038). In the multivariate analysis, ASA score (HR 1.79; 95&#x0025; CI 1.09&#x2013;2.97; <italic>p</italic>-value&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.022) and postoperative antibiotic usage (HR 0.49; 95&#x0025; CI 0.26&#x2013;0.94; <italic>p</italic>-value&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.032) emerged as independent risk factors for postoperative complications.</p>
</sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In colorectal cancer patients over the age of 70, prolonged antibiotic usage demonstrated a reduction in the rate of postoperative complications, including anastomotic leakage. Considering the potentially fatal consequences of postoperative complications in the elderly, the advantages of extended antibiotic administration beyond conventional usage outweigh the concerns regarding complications or costs associated with antibiotics use.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>colorectal cancer</kwd>
<kwd>postoperative complication</kwd>
<kwd>prolonged antibiotic usage</kwd>
<kwd>surgery</kwd>
<kwd>the elderly</kwd>
</kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.</funding-statement></funding-group><counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="4"/><equation-count count="0"/><ref-count count="32"/><page-count count="8"/><word-count count="1588"/></counts><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name><meta-value>Colorectal and Proctological Surgery</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title>
<p>Improvements in healthcare services and living conditions are leading to a rapid increase in the elderly population worldwide. As life expectancy increases, the incidence of colorectal cancer in the patients of advanced age is also increasing, leading to a rise in the number of older adults requiring surgical treatments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>). Because surgery is the only curative treatment for colorectal cancer, even in the elderly patient, surgical resection is being actively performed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). As the advanced age population is expected to grow continuously, and age is a significant risk factor for colorectal cancer, the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer in this age are anticipated to further increase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>).</p>
<p>While the health of the older adults has improved significantly, it is essential to acknowledge that despite these advancements, age-related physiological changes lead to a reduced capacity to tolerate stress. Factors such as diminished immune function and impaired tissue healing contribute to this vulnerability compared to younger individuals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>). Elderly patients commonly present with multiple comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, and renal dysfunction, which are more common in this age group and contribute to increased surgical risk. Hence, these patients frequently face elevated postoperative risks and have a higher susceptibility to infectious complications, which can lead to potentially life-threatening outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>).</p>
<p>In recent years, there has been a growing body of research exploring the optimal strategies for minimizing postoperative complications in elderly patients. By extending the duration of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in elderly patients, who appears to have the potential to reduce postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate whether prolonged postoperative antibiotics administration is associated with improved postoperative complications in elderly (&#x2265;70 aged) patients undergoing curative colorectal cancer surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="methods"><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2a"><title>Study design and setting</title>
<p>This study was designed as a retrospective cohort study conducted at Soonchunhayng University Bucheon Hospital, a tertiary referral center in South Korea. Clinical, operative, and pathological data were extracted from the institutional electronic medical record (EMR)-based colorectal surgery database. All data were reviewed for patients treated between January 2016 and December 2022, with follow-up continued until December 2023. This retrospective cohort study was conducted and reported in accordance with the STROBE guidelines for observational studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2b"><title>Patients</title>
<p>Between January 2016 and December 2022, a total of 292 patients aged 70 years or older who underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer were identified from a retrospective database. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age &#x2265;70 years, (2) histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma, and (3) curative-intent surgical resection. Exclusion criteria included: (1) stage IV disease, (2) synchronous or metachronous colorectal cancer, (3) palliative surgery or bypass procedures, and (4) incomplete medical records. The study was divided into two groups and analyzed. A total of 292 patients met the inclusion criteria. All surgery was performed elective surgery. Patients were categorized based on postoperative antibiotic duration into two group:
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>POD&#x0023;1 group: postoperative antibiotics discontinued within postoperative day 1 (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;214)</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>POD&#x0023;3 group: postoperative antibiotics continued for &#x2265;3 postoperative days (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;78)</p></list-item>
</list>In the POD&#x0023;3 group, considering the median range of the group that continuously used antibiotics, we categorized it as 3 days or more. Prolongation beyond postoperative day 3 was mainly based on clinical judgement, including higher ASA score, presence of multiple comorbidities, suspected intraoperative contamination, or early postoperative signs suggestive of increased infection risk. All data on clinical and pathological features were reviewed retrospectively. All patients underwent colonoscopy, biopsy, and staging scans [chest, abdomen, and pelvis computed tomography (CT) scans], and occasionally, positron emission tomography scans were performed. All patients underwent curative resection. Rectal cancer patients with clinically T3 or T4 and/or node positive received long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) (five cycles of fluorouracil based chemotherapy and 50.4 Gy). Patients received close follow-up and were included in a database until December 2023 or their death if this occurred before December 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2c"><title>Exposure and outcome definitions</title>
<sec id="s2c1"><title>Exposure (independent variable)</title>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Duration of postoperative systemic antibiotic administration (1 vs. &#x2265;3 days)</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Antibiotic regimen followed institutional colorectal surgery protocol (2nd generation cephalosporin or 3rd-generation cephalosporin&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;metronidazole, or piperacillin-tazobactam)</p></list-item>
</list>
<p>All patients received a standard preoperative prophylactic regimen consisting of 2nd generation cephalosporin administered within 60&#x2005;min prior to skin incision, according to institutional protocol. Postoperative antibiotic regimen were 2nd generation cephalosporin or 3rd-generation cephalosporin&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;metronidazole, or piperacillin-tazobactam.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2c2"><title>Primary outcome</title>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Total postoperative complications, defined as any complication occurring within 30 postoperative days.</p></list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="s2c3"><title>Secondary outcomes</title>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Infection-related complications, including;</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Anastomotic leakage (clinical or radiologic confirmation),</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Surgical site infection (CDC criteria),</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Pneumonia (clinical symptoms&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;radiologic evidence),</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Intra-abdominal abscess,</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Colitis,</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Urinary tract infection (urinalysis&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;cuture).</p></list-item>
</list>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2d"><title>Bias and confounding control</title>
<p>To reduce selection bias, uniform inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied. To minimize information bias, all complications were adjudicated independently by two colorectal surgeons. Potential confounders (age, sex, BMI, ASA score, tumor stage, surgical method) were adjusted for using multivariate logistic regression. No imputation was required as missing data were minimal (&#x003C;1&#x0025;) and managed by complete-case analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2e"><title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Categorical variables were analyzed using the <italic>&#x03C7;</italic><sup>2</sup> or Fisher&#x0027;s exact tests. Continuous variables were compared using Student&#x0027;s <italic>t</italic> test or Mann&#x2013;Whitney <italic>U</italic> rank test, as appropriate. Variables with <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.10 in univariate analysis or recognized as clinically relevant were entered into the multivariate logistic regression model to identify independent risk factors for postoperative complications. Result were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95&#x0025; confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses were performed using SAS Version 9.1.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and SPSS Version 24.0. A two-sided <italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C;0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2f"><title>Ethics</title>
<p>This study was approved by the institutional Review Board of Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital (IRB No: SCHBC2025-05-012). Given the retrospective study design and anonymized data collection, the requirement for informed consent was waived.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3a"><title>Patients characteristics</title>
<p>A total of 292 patients were included in the analysis, with 214 receiving antibiotics postoperatively 1 day (POD&#x0023;1 group) and 78 receiving antibiotics for at least 3 days postoperatively (POD&#x0023;3 group) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x00A0;1</xref>). Mean age, sex ratio, weight, height and body mass index (BMI) have no significant difference between the two groups. Laparoscopic or robotic surgery were performed 93.0&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;199) in POD&#x0023;1 group and 88.5&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;69) in POD&#x0023;3 group. There was no significant difference in the location of the lesion between the two groups.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float"><label>Table&#x00A0;1</label>
<caption><p>Patient characteristics (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;292).</p></caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"/>
<th valign="top" align="center">POD&#x0023;1 group (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;214) (&#x0025;)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">POD&#x0023;3 group (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;78) (&#x0025;)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age [mean&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;SD, (range)] (year)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">76.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;4.5 (70&#x2013;92)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">77.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;4.7 (70&#x2013;88)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sex, <italic>n</italic> (&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.903</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Male</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95 (44.4&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34 (43.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Female</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">119 (55.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44 (56.4&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Weight [mean&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;SD, (range)] (kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;10.0 (33.3&#x2013;92.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;10.6 (32.0&#x2013;83.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.649</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Height [mean&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;SD, (range)] (cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">158.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;8.6 (133.3&#x2013;174.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">156.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;8.6 (135.5&#x2013;175.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.965</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BMI [mean&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;SD, (range)] (kg/m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;3.6 (13.9&#x2013;38.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;3.8 (14.6&#x2013;33.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.414</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ASA score, <italic>n</italic> (&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.206</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19 (8.9&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (2.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">141 (65.9&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50 (64.1&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52 (24.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25 (32.0&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (0.9&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (1.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Surgical method</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.212</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Open</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15 (7.0&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9 (11.5&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Laparoscopic or robotic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">199 (93.0&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69 (88.5&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lesion location</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.251</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Right side</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61 (28.5&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27 (34.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Left side</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">103 (48.1&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29 (37.2&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Rectum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50 (23.4&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22 (28.2&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3b"><title>Pathologic results</title>
<p>Colorectal cancer are classified according to the 8th edition of American Joint committees on Cancer (AJCC) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x00A0;2</xref>). In the POD&#x0023;1 group, stage III was the most common at 34.6&#x0025;, followed by stage II at 33.6&#x0025;, and then stage I at 26.6&#x0025;. Conversely, in the POD&#x0023;3 group, stage 2 was the most prevalent at 42.3&#x0025;, followed by stage 3 at 35.9&#x0025;, and stage I at 19.2&#x0025;. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups. In both groups, the majority exhibited a moderate degree of differentiation (78.0&#x0025; vs. 78.2&#x0025;). The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 20.8 and 25.9, respectively, with no significant difference observed. The presence of lymphovascular invasion was 83.2&#x0025; in POD&#x0023;1 group and 78.2&#x0025; in POD&#x0023;3 group. The perineural invasion was 58.4&#x0025; vs. 39.7&#x0025; in each groups respectively. The proximal resection margin and distal resection margin measured 9.3 and 9.7&#x2005;cm, and 6.3 and 7.1&#x2005;cm, respectively, with no statistically significant difference.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float"><label>Table&#x00A0;2</label>
<caption><p>Postoperative pathologic outcomes (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;292).</p></caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"/>
<th valign="top" align="center">POD&#x0023;1 group (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;214) (&#x0025;)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">POD&#x0023;3 group (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;78) (&#x0025;)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pTNM stage, no. (&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.341</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11 (5.1&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (2.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;I</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57 (26.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15 (19.2&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;II</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72 (33.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33 (42.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;III</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74 (34.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28 (35.9&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pT stage, no. (&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12 (5.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (2.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32 (14.9&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6 (7.7&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36 (16.8&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9 (11.5&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">123 (57.5&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42 (53.8&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11 (5.1&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19 (24.4&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pN stage, no. (&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.215</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">140 (65.4&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50 (64.1&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53 (24.8&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15 (19.2&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21 (9.8&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13 (16.7&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Grade of differentiation, no. (&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.074</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Well</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29 (13.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5 (6.4&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Moderate</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">167 (78.0&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61 (78.2&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Poor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15 (7.0&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8 (10.2&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Mucinous</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (1.4&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4 (5.1&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Harvested no. of lymph nodes, (mean&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;SD), (no)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;11.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;12.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.265</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lymphovascular invasion</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.329</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;No</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">178 (83.2&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61 (78.2&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Yes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36 (16.8&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17 (21.8&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.005</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Perineural invasion</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;No</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">125 (58.4&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31 (39.7&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Yes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">89 (41.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47 (60.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PRM, (mean&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;SD), (cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;5.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;6.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.333</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DRM, (mean&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;SD), (cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;6.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.1&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;8.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.094</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3c"><title>Postoperative outcomes</title>
<p>The postoperative outcomes are described in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x00A0;3</xref>. A significant difference between two groups was observed in the rates of total postoperative complications, infection-related complications and antibiotic re-use (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x00A0;1</xref>). In the POD&#x0023;1 group, complications occurred at a rate of 25.7&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;55), while the POD&#x0023;3 group showed a lower complication rate of 14.1&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;11) (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.036). The infection-related complications such as anastomotic leakage, wound infection, pneumonia occurred at a rate of 20.1&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;43) in POD&#x0023;1 group compared to 5.1&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;4) in POD&#x0023;3 group (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.002). When classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system, the POD&#x0023;3 group showed a lower incidence of grade (I&#x2013;II) complication compared with the POD&#x0023;1 group (11.5&#x0025; vs. 22.5&#x0025;, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) while high grade (III&#x2013;IV) complications were similar between group. The patients in the POD&#x0023;1 group to whom antibiotics reintroduced during hospitalization due to necessity, and the patients in the POD&#x0023;3 group to whom antibiotics were discontinued and then resumed were categorized as antibiotic reutilization. The antibiotic reuse rate was 22.4&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;48) in the POD&#x0023;1 group and 11.5&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;9) in the POD&#x0023;3 group (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.038). Mortality occurred exclusively in the group that used antibiotics perioperatively, and the causes of death were pelvic sepsis due to anastomotic leakage and pneumonia. The 30-day readmission rate was 5.1&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;11) in the POD&#x0023;1 group and 3.8&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;3) in the POD&#x0023;3 group (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.647). The emergency room visit rates within 30 days was 6.5&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;14) in the POD&#x0023;1 group and 3.8&#x0025; (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;3) in the POD&#x0023;3 group (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.384), but there was no statistically significant difference. The average length of hospital stay was also comparable between the two groups, at 10.5 and 10.8 days, with no significant difference.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float"><label>Table&#x00A0;3</label>
<caption><p>Postoperative outcomes (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;292).</p></caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"/>
<th valign="top" align="center">POD&#x0023;1 group (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;214) (&#x0025;)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">POD&#x0023;3 group (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;78) (&#x0025;)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total postoperative complications (<italic>n</italic>; &#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55 (25.7&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12 (15.4&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.036</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Infection related complications (<italic>n</italic>; &#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43 (20.1&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4 (5.1&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;&#x2003;Anastomosis site leakage</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9 (4.2&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (1.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;&#x2003;Wound infection</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13 (6.1&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (2.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;&#x2003;Pneumonia</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12 (5.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0 (0.0&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;&#x2003;Intraabdominal abscess</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (0.9&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (1.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;&#x2003;Colitis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5 (2.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0 (0.0&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;&#x2003;Acute pyelonephritis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (0.5&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (1.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;&#x2003;Phlebitis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (0.5&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0 (0.0&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Other complications (<italic>n</italic>; &#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19 (8.9&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8 (10.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.495</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#d9d9d9" colspan="4">Clavien&#x2013;Dindo grades</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;I&#x2013;II</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48 (22.4&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9 (11.5&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.042</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;III&#x2013;IV</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7 (3.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (3.8&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.376</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Antibiotics reuse (<italic>n</italic>; &#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48 (22.4&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9 (11.5&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.038</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total Mortality</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 (0.9&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0 (0.0&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.392</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Readmission within 30 days (<italic>n</italic>; &#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11 (5.1&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (3.8&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.647</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Visit emergency within 30 days (<italic>n</italic>; &#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14 (6.5&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3 (3.8&#x0025;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.384</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hospital stay [mean&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;SD, (range)] (day)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;5.8 (7&#x2013;44)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;3.8 (7&#x2013;23)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.217</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F1" position="float"><label>Figure&#x00A0;1</label>
<caption><p>A significant difference between two groups was observed in the rates of total postoperative complications, infection-related complications and antibiotic reuse.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="fsurg-12-1734652-g001.tif"><alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart comparing postoperative complications for POD#1 and POD#3. Three categories: total complications, infection-related complications, and antibiotics reuse. POD#1 has higher values in all categories. Significance noted with p-value less than 0.05.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3d"><title>Univariate and multivariate analysis for risk factor for postoperative complications</title>
<p>The results of univariate and multivariate analyses are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table&#x00A0;4</xref>. Univariate analysis demonstrates a significant relationship between postoperative complications and sex, ASA score, and postoperative antibiotic usage. In the multivariate analysis, ASA score (HR 1.79; 95&#x0025; CI 1.09&#x2013;2.97; <italic>p</italic>-value&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.022) and postoperative antibiotic usage (HR 0.49; 95&#x0025; CI 0.26&#x2013;0.94; <italic>p</italic>-value&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.032) emerged as independent risk factors for postoperative complications.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float"><label>Table&#x00A0;4</label>
<caption><p>Univariate and multivariate analysis for risk factor of postoperative complication.</p></caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left" rowspan="2">Factors</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">Univariate analysis</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">Multivariate analysis</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">HR</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">95&#x0025; CI</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">HR</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">95&#x0025; CI</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age, years (70&#x2013;79 vs. &#x2265;80)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.38&#x2013;1.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.200</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sex (male vs. female)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.34&#x2013;0.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.031</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.63&#x2013;1.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.065</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BMI (&#x003C;25 vs. &#x2265;25)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.58&#x2013;1.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.897</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ASA score (&#x2264;2 vs. &#x003E;2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.12&#x2013;3.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.016</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.09&#x2013;2.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.022</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stage (I&#x2013;II vs. III)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.71&#x2013;1.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.554</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T stage (0&#x2013;2 vs. 3&#x2013;4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.63&#x2013;1.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.833</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Surgical type (open vs. minimal invasive)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.29&#x2013;1.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.195</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tumor location (right side vs. left side)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.84&#x2013;1.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.377</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tumor location (colon vs. rectum)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.86&#x2013;2.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.168</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Postoperative prophylactic antibiotics (&#x2264;1 vs. &#x2265;3 days)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.27&#x2013;1.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.047</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.26&#x2013;0.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.032</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title>
<p>According to the World Health Organization GLOBOCAN database, colorectal cancer ranks as the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in males and the second most commonly diagnosed in females globally, with expectations of continued increase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>). Similarly, at the present institution, the number of colorectal cancer surgeries in patients over 70 years of age is gradually increasing (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x00A0;2</xref>). Elderly patients exhibited a heightened incidence of postoperative complications, notably infection-related issues including surgical site infections, urinary tract infections, and respiratory infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>). As a result, this leads to an increase in both the length of hospital stay and admission rate to intensive care units, along with higher rates of morbidity and mortality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). While complication prevention is important for all age groups, tailored strategies for complication prevention are necessary considering the specificity of the elderly population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). Recently, in colorectal surgery, the combination of oral antibiotics with mechanical bowel preparation is recommended, given its advantages in terms of reducing anastomotic leakage, morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). Conversely, it has been established that the routine use of antibiotics for postoperative days does not provide any additional benefits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). However, these studies were conducted on relatively younger populations, and the benefits of postoperative antibiotic use in the elderly groups have not been definitively established.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float"><label>Figure&#x00A0;2</label>
<caption><p>Number of colorectal cancer surgery with over 70 years of age in present institution. It shows that the number of surgeries for colorectal cancer in elderly is gradually increasing.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="fsurg-12-1734652-g002.tif"><alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar graph showing the number of colorectal cancer surgeries for individuals over 70 years of age from 2001 to 2020. The numbers increase in each period, from about 100 in 2001-2005 to over 300 in 2016-2020.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery is devastating complication resulting in significantly increased morbidity, mortality, and medical expense. The rate of anastomotic leakage, approximately 10 percent, varies based on the location of the anastomosis and differs among studies due to variations in its definition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). The human intestinal microbiome is believed to intricately contribute to the pathogenesis of physical conditions such as obesity, gastrointestinal malignancies, and Crohn&#x0027;s disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>). However, its impact on various diseases remains largely undiscovered. The healing and disruption of anastomosis after colorectal resection is one of the relatively unexplored area where intraluminal microbes are anticipated to play a crucial role.</p>
<p>The first investigation that evaluates effect of the microbiome on colonic anastomosis administered antibiotics directly to the anastomotic site via an indwelling catheter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>). The study group demonstrated complete anastomotic healing, while the control group which administered saline without antibiotics developed leakage, peritonitis, and death. Another similar study in the rats exhibited the healing effect of the non-absorbable oral antibiotics on colonic anastomosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>). In applying these findings to a prospective, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical multicenter trial, the patients with oral decontamination, from preoperative day to postoperative day 7, after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer showed lower mortality and fewer anastomotic leakage compared to the placebo group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>). The surgical group applied this protocol to colorectal surgery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>). The treatment group was administered oral antibiotics starting the day before surgery until postoperative day 7, demonstrating a lower rate of anastomotic leakage and infectious complications compared to the placebo group. In present study, the patients were administered systemic antibiotics instead of oral antibiotics and this is significant because, while the incidence rate of anastomotic leakage is generally known to be around 10&#x0025;, in this study, the POD&#x0023;1 group exhibited a lower incidence rate of 4.2&#x0025;, and the POD&#x0023;3 group showed an even lower rate of 1.3&#x0025;.</p>
<p>All surgeries conducted under general anesthesia carry the risk of developing postoperative pneumonia, which can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality. The incidence of postoperative pneumonia has been reported to range from 2.2&#x0025; to 13&#x0025; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>), but more prevalent in the elderly patients with old age itself being a risk factor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>). General anesthesia and surgery, along with consequent atelectasis, alter lung mechanics and breathing patterns, thereby making the lung defense system more susceptible to infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>). Additionally, the incidence of postoperative pneumonia tends to be higher in patients with atelectasis, which occurs more frequently in old ages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>). Although the use of postoperative antibiotics to prevent or reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia haven&#x0027;t been established, this study is significant in that the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in the POD&#x0023;3 group was 0&#x0025; compared to 5.6&#x0025; in the POD&#x0023;1 group. Given that postoperative pneumonia is more fatal in the elderly, it is necessary to consider additional antibiotic use beyond conventional practice.</p>
<p>In this retrospective cohort study of 292 patients aged &#x2265;70 years undergoing curative colorectal cancer surgery, prolonged postoperative antibiotic administration (&#x2265;3 days) was associated with a significantly lower rate of overall complications, infection-related complications, and postoperative antibiotic reuse compared with standard discontinuation on postoperative day 1. Notably, the POD&#x0023;3 group demonstrated markedly reduced rates of anastomotic leakage and pneumonia, both of which are particularly detrimental in elderly and comorbid populations. Although our results differ from guideline recommendations, they should not be interpreted as evidence to change clinical practice. Instead, they highlight a potential gap in current evidence: the lack of prospective studies focusing on high-risk elderly surgical patients. The reduced rates of anastomotic leakage and pneumonia observed in our study may warrant further evaluation in controlled trials targeting this vulnerable population.</p>
<p>This study has several limitations. Its retrospective design introduces the potential for selection bias, and decisions regarding prolonged antibiotics were at the discretion of treating surgeons. Residual confounding may remain despite multivariate adjustment. Additionally, this is a single-center experience and may not be generalizable to other institutions with different perioperative protocols. Nevertheless, the consistent benefit observed across multiple clinically relevant outcomes suggests that postoperative antibiotic duration may merit further investigation in elderly colorectal cancer patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions"><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In conclusion, while prophylactic guidelines discourage extended postoperative antibiotics for the general population, the present study data indicate a possible role for selective use in order, high risk patients. Prospective randomized studies are needed to validate these findings and to better defined which elderly patients may benefit from prolonged postoperative prophylaxis.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability"><title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because this study is a medical chart review study. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to Daero Lim, <email>limdaero@schmc.ac.kr</email>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="ethics-statement"><title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving humans were approved by Review Board of Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, South Korea/IRB No. 2025-05-012. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="author-contributions"><title>Author contributions</title>
<p>GP: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. NP: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. JK: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Data curation, Formal analysis. DL: Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Project administration. ES: Validation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Supervision.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="COI-statement"><title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="ai-statement"><title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="disclaimer"><title>Publisher&#x0027;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list><title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Watters</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Surgery in the elderly</article-title>. <source>Can J Surg</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>45</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>104</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11939651</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lemmens</surname> <given-names>VE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Janssen-Heijnen</surname> <given-names>ML</given-names></name> <name><surname>Houterman</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verheij</surname> <given-names>KD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martijn</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>van de Poll-Franse</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Which comorbid conditions predict complications after surgery for colorectal cancer?</article-title> <source>World J Surg</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>31</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>192</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00268-005-0711-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17180570</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rawla</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sunkara</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barsouk</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors</article-title>. <source>Prz Gastroenterol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>14</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>89</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>103</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5114/pg.2018.81072</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31616522</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Evers</surname> <given-names>BM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Townsend</surname><given-names>CM</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name> <name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Organ physiology of aging</article-title>. <source>Surg Clin North Am</source>. (<year>1994</year>) <volume>74</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0039-6109(16)46226-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8108769</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Seymour</surname> <given-names>DG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pringle</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Post-operative complications in the elderly surgical patient</article-title>. <source>Gerontology</source>. (<year>1983</year>) <volume>29</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>262</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1159/000213125</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6873640</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morgan</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arnold</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gini</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lorenzoni</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cabasag</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laversanne</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN</article-title>. <source>Gut</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>72</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>338</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327736</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36604116</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Frago</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramirez</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Millan</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kreisler</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>del Valle</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Biondo</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Current management of acute malignant large bowel obstruction: a systematic review</article-title>. <source>Am J Surg</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>207</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>38</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.027</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24124659</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grosso</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Biondi</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marventano</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mistretta</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Calabrese</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Basile</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Major postoperative complications and survival for colon cancer elderly patients</article-title>. <source>BMC Surg</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2482-12-S1-S20</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22244356</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><collab>Colorectal Canc Collaborative Group</collab>, <person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Best</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baughan</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buchanan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fentiman</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review</article-title>. <source>Lancet</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>356</volume>(<issue>9234</issue>):<fpage>968</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02713-6</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11041397</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tahiri</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sikder</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maimon</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teasdale</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamadani</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sourial</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>The impact of postoperative complications on the recovery of elderly surgical patients</article-title>. <source>Surg Endosc</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>1762</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00464-015-4440-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26194260</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bernard</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cole</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The prophylaxis of surgical infection: the effect of prophylactic antimicrobial drugs on the incidence of infection following potentially contaminated operations</article-title>. <source>Surgery</source>. (<year>1964</year>) <volume>56</volume>:<fpage>151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14174732</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miles</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miles</surname> <given-names>EM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burke</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The value and duration of defence reactions of the skin to the primary lodgement of bacteria</article-title>. <source>Br J Exp Pathol</source>. (<year>1957</year>) <volume>38</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>79</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">13413084</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Polk</surname><given-names>HC</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name> <name><surname>Christmas</surname> <given-names>AB</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Prophylactic antibiotics in surgery and surgical wound infections</article-title>. <source>Am Surg</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>66</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/000313480006600203</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10695738</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Migaly</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bafford</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Francone</surname> <given-names>TD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaertner</surname> <given-names>WB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eskicioglu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bordeianou</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>The American society of colon and rectal surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the use of bowel preparation in elective colon and rectal surgery</article-title>. <source>Dis Colon Rectum</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>62</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/DCR.0000000000001238</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30531263</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stone</surname> <given-names>HH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haney</surname> <given-names>BB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kolb</surname> <given-names>LD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geheber</surname> <given-names>CE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hooper</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Prophylactic and preventive antibiotic therapy: timing, duration and economics</article-title>. <source>Ann Surg</source>. (<year>1979</year>) <volume>189</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>691</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00000658-197906000-00004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">378140</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Branagan</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Finnis</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery</article-title>. <source>Dis Colon Rectum</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>48</volume>:<fpage>1021</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10350-004-0869-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15789125</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shogan</surname> <given-names>BD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carlisle</surname> <given-names>EM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alverdy</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Umanskiy</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Do we really know why colorectal anastomoses leak?</article-title> <source>J Gastrointest Surg</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>17</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<fpage>1698</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>707</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11605-013-2227-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23690209</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Paun</surname> <given-names>BC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cassie</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>MacLean</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dixon</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buie</surname> <given-names>WD</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer</article-title>. <source>Ann Surg</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>251</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>807</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181dae4ed</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20395841</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morowitz</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Babrowski</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carlisle</surname> <given-names>EM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olivas</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Romanowski</surname> <given-names>KS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seal</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>The human microbiome and surgical disease</article-title>. <source>Ann Surg</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>253</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>1094</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821175d7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21422915</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cohn</surname><given-names>I</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name> <name><surname>Rives</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Antibiotic protection of colon anastomoses</article-title>. <source>Ann Surg</source>. (<year>1955</year>) <volume>141</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>707</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00000658-195505000-00016</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14362409</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cornell</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Collins</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sell</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blanc</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Altman</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Healing of ischemic colonic anastomoses in the rat: role of antibiotic preparation</article-title>. <source>Surgery</source>. (<year>1985</year>) <volume>97</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>443</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3983820</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schardey</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kamps</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rau</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gatermann</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baretton</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schildberg</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Bacteria: a major pathogenic factor for anastomotic insufficiency</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</source>. (<year>1994</year>) <volume>38</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<fpage>2564</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.38.11.2564</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7872748</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schardey</surname> <given-names>HM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joosten</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Finke</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Staubach</surname> <given-names>KH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schauer</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heiss</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>The prevention of anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy with local decontamination: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial</article-title>. <source>Ann Surg</source>. (<year>1997</year>) <volume>225</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>172</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00000658-199702000-00005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9065294</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Combat with esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a critical review of the literature</article-title>. <source>Int J Surg</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>47</volume>:<fpage>18</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28935529</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schardey</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wirth</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strauss</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kasparek</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jauch</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Prevention of anastomotic leak in rectal cancer surgery with local antibiotic decontamination: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single center trial</article-title>. <source>Int J Colorectal Dis</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>35</volume>:<fpage>847</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00384-020-03544-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32103326</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chughtai</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gwam</surname> <given-names>CU</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohamed</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khlopas</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Newman</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>The epidemiology and risk factors for postoperative pneumonia</article-title>. <source>J Clin Med Res</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>9</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>466</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>75</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14740/jocmr3002w</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28496546</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Risk factors for postoperative pneumonia: a case-control study</article-title>. <source>Front Public Health</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>913897</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpubh.2022.913897</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35875004</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duggan</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kavanagh</surname> <given-names>BP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Warltier</surname> <given-names>DC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Pulmonary atelectasis: a pathogenic perioperative entity</article-title>. <source>Anesthesiology</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>102</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>838</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00000542-200504000-00021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15791115</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ko</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yoo</surname> <given-names>KY</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>CH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jun</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>YH</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Is atelectasis related to the development of postoperative pneumonia? A retrospective single center study</article-title>. <source>BMC Anesthesiol</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>23</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>77</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12871-023-02020-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36906539</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cassidy</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosenkranz</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCabe</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosen</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAneny</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>I COUGH: reducing postoperative pulmonary complications with a multidisciplinary patient care program</article-title>. <source>JAMA Surg</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>148</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<fpage>740</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jamasurg.2013.358</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23740240</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>RR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hota</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scott</surname> <given-names>RD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Foster</surname> <given-names>SD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abbasi</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Hospital and societal costs of antimicrobial-resistant infections in a Chicago teaching hospital: implications for antibiotic stewardship</article-title>. <source>Clin Infect Dis</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>49</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<fpage>1175</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>84</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/605630</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19739972</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Daneman</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gruneir</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bronskill</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Newman</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fischer</surname> <given-names>HD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rochon</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Prolonged antibiotic treatment in long-term care: role of the prescriber</article-title>. <source>JAMA Intern Med</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>173</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<fpage>673</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3029</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23552741</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="n1" fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1842602/overview">Georgios-Ioannis Verras</ext-link>, Southampton General Hospital, United Kingdom</p></fn>
<fn id="n2" fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by"><p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1380537/overview">Giovanni Tomasicchio</ext-link>, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3136857/overview">Adrian Silaghi</ext-link>, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania</p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>