<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Surg.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Surgery</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Surg.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-875X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsurg.2022.860564</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Surgery</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Restoring Theoretically Optimal Lumbar Lordosis Deduced from Pelvic Incidence and Thoracic Kyphosis has Advantages to Decrease the Risk of Postoperative Mechanical Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Jingyu</given-names></name><uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1749148/overview" /></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Qianshi</given-names></name></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Fubing</given-names></name></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>Hui</given-names></name></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yi</given-names></name></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Xiaobin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">&#x002A;</xref><uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1585316/overview" /></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jing</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">&#x002A;</xref><uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1751072/overview"/></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><addr-line>Department of Spine Surgery</addr-line>, <institution>Spinal Deformity Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University</institution>, <addr-line>Changsha</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p><bold>Edited by:</bold> Prashanth J. Rao, University of New South Wales, Australia</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p><bold>Reviewed by:</bold> Gregory Fabrice Jost, University of Basel, Switzerland Jean Claude De Mauroy, Independent Researcher, Route des Rivoires, St Didier de la Tour, France</p></fn>
<corresp id="cor1"><label>&#x002A;</label><bold>Correspondence:</bold> Xiaobin Wang <email>wxbspine@csu.edu.cn</email> Jing Li <email>jingli1969@csu.edu.cn</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><p><bold>Speciality section:</bold> This article was submitted to Orthopedic Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>04</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>860564</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>01</month><year>2022</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2022 Wang, Zhang, Liu, Yuan, Zhang, Wang and Li.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Wang, Zhang, Liu, Yuan, Zhang, Wang and Li</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract><sec>
<title>Objective</title>
<p>To establish a regression formula for LL based on individual PI and TK in asymptomatic population aged over 50 years and evaluate its predictive power for the occurrence of postoperative mechanical complications in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>A total of 178 asymptomatic adults were recruited for the study. The association between LL and PI, LL and TK, was investigated to establish a predictive formula for ideal LL based on PI and TK. Additionally, 93 ASD patients undergoing posterior correction surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The absolute value of the gap between postoperative actual LL and theoretical LL was defined as &#x0394;LL. Patients were classified into two groups depending on the presence or absence of mechanical complications. The demographic and radiological data of patients were compared between the two groups.</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>A significant association was found between LL and PI (<italic>r&#x2009;</italic>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.599, <italic>P&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;</italic>0.001), LL and TK (<italic>r&#x2009;</italic>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.523, <italic>P&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;</italic>0.001). A novel formula was developed as follows: LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.7&#x002A;PI&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;0.4&#x002A;TK&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;1 (<italic>R</italic><sup>2&#x2009;</sup>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.524). In the validation cohort, 29 patients developed mechanical complications. Postoperative &#x0394;LL (12.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;7.6&#x00B0; vs. 7.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;5.4&#x00B0;, <italic>P&#x2009;</italic>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.001) significantly increased the incidence of mechanical complications. The most appropriate threshold of &#x0394;LL for predicting mechanical complications was 9.8&#x00B0;. For patients whose &#x0394;LL were <italic>&#x003C;</italic>9.8&#x00B0; and &#x003E;9.8&#x00B0;, the incidence of mechanical complications was 19.4&#x0025; and 54.8&#x0025;, respectively.</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Ideal lumbar lordosis should be matched for PI and TK. The developed prediction formula for LL based on PI and TK in asymptomatic adults may help surgeons to understand the mechanisms of lumbar alignment generation and predict occurrence of mechanical complications after ASD surgery.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>lumbar lordosis</kwd>
<kwd>pelvic incidence</kwd>
<kwd>thoracic kyphosis</kwd>
<kwd>adult spinal deformity</kwd>
<kwd>mechanical complications</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">02220048</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Hunan Goodnight furnishings industry Co., Ltd.</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="5"/><equation-count count="0"/><ref-count count="31"/><page-count count="0"/><word-count count="0"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The prevalence of adult spinal deformity (ASD) in the general population has been reported to range from 1.4 to 32&#x0025;, reaching 68&#x0025; in older patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>). Clinically, ASD presents with three-dimensional deformity of the spine and poor quality of life in patients. Surgical treatment can improve global balance and clinical symptoms of ASD patients. However, surgery may increase the risk of mechanical complications such as proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF), and instrumentation failure by 20&#x0025;&#x2013;50&#x0025; in ASD patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). Patients with serious complications require repeat surgery, which adds financial pressure on their family and society (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>). Therefore, it is crucial to predict and develop strategies to avoid these complications.</p>
<p>Mechanical complications of ASD surgery are heterogenous and multifactorial (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>). Majority of studies have reported that restoration of &#x201C;normal sagittal alignment&#x201D; should be the critical goal of ASD surgery as this can significantly decrease the incidence of postoperative mechanical complications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). Previously, a series of algorithms were constructed to guide the reconstruction of lumbar lordosis (LL). In a study by Sebaaly et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>), it was found that the formulae for predicting LL solely based on pelvic incidence (PI) or thoracic kyphosis (TK) did not accurately predict the occurrence of mechanical complications; however, they reported that the global sagittal alignment satisfying the formula PI&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;LL&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;TK<italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;</italic>45&#x00B0; could predict PJK with high sensitivity.</p>
<p>Accumulating evidence shows that LL is determined by pelvic incidence (PI), and is correlated with thoracic kyphosis (TK) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). To date, several predictive models for ideal LL based on individual PI in asymptomatic adults of different races have been proposed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). Nevertheless, few studies have tested the prediction performance of combined PI and TK in LL. Moreover, the studies were carried out using cohorts with young and middle-aged population. The parameters for sagittal alignment restoration may vary across ages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). Therefore, a prediction formula for LL should be developed for elderly population.</p>
<p>The primary aim of this study was to establish a prediction formula for LL based on individual PI and TK in asymptomatic population aged over 50 years and evaluate its ability to predict occurrence of postoperative mechanical complications in ASD patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="s2a">
<title>Patient Population</title>
<p>In the current study, 178 asymptomatic patients aged over 50 years were prospectively recruited at our institution between November, 2020 and August, 2021. The inclusion criteria of patients were as follows: (1) no spinal pathology or deformity; (2) no history of pelvic, hip, or lower limbs disease; (3) no history of spinal surgery; (4) no neurological or neuromuscular disorder.</p>
<p>To verify ability of the established formula to predict occurrence of mechanical complications, 93 ASD patients undergoing posterior pedicle screw correction between January 2010 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The inclusion criteria were: (1) age &#x003E;50 years; (2) UIV at T9 to T11; (3) lower instrumented vertebrae (LIV) at sacrum&#x002F;iliac; (4) complete full-spine radiographs (preoperative, immediate postoperative and at the last follow-up); (5) follow-up time&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;two years. Exclusion criteria were: (1) incomplete medical records; (2) scoliosis secondary to infection, tumor, trauma, or neuromuscular scoliosis.</p>
<p>This study was approved by our institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from each participant.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2b">
<title>Data Collection</title>
<p>Demographic data, including gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) were collected from all participants.</p>
<p>Full-spine X-rays were obtained from each participant in erect standing posture with a clavicle position (the elbows fully bent with hands placing into the supraclavicular fossae) or 90&#x00B0;position (the arms and elbows straight out with hands gently grasping a bar) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>).</p>
<p>Using Surgimap (Spine Software, version 2.3.2.1, New York, NY), the following radiographical parameters were measured: (1) PI, angle subtended by a perpendicular line from the midpoint of the S1 endplate and a line connecting this point to the center of femoral heads; (2) pelvic tilt (PT), angle between the plumb line and the line connecting the femoral head axis and center of the sacral plate; (3) sacral slope (SS), angle between the horizontal line and superior endplate of S1; (4) LL, Cobb angle bound by the superior endplate of L1 and S1; (5) TK, Cobb angle formed between the superior endplate of T5 and the inferior of T12; (6) T1 pelvic angle (TPA), the angle formed by two lines from the femoral head axis to the midpoint of the S1 endplate and the center of T1.</p>
<p>All radiographical parameters were measured by two spinal surgeons, and mean values were used for data analysis. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was assessed in 50 randomly selected patients based on intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The intra-observer ICCs for PI, PT, SS, LL, TK, TPA were 0.902, 0.925, 0.932, 0.961, 0.903, and 0.914, whereas inter-observer ICCs for the aforementioned parameters were 0.928, 0.931, 0.910, 0.935, 0.892, and 0.937, respectively. Both intra- and inter-observer reliability were satisfactory according to the Shrout and Fleiss criteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2c">
<title>Development and Validation of the Predictive Model</title>
<p>The association of LL with PI and TK was investigated in the derivation cohort to establish the prediction formula for LL based on individual PI and TK in asymptomatic population.</p>
<p>The presence and type of mechanical complications were recorded (PJK, PJF, instrumentation failure not related to PJF such as rod breakage and screw pull-out or breakage) in the validation cohort. PJK was defined as postoperative proximal junctional angle (PJA)&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;10&#x00B0;, and at least 10&#x00B0; greater than its corresponding preoperative value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>). PJF was defined as implant-bone interface failure at the UIV, and fracture of the UIV or UIV&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>). Patients were classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of mechanical complications.</p>
<p>Then, the ideal LL of patients in the validation cohort was determined using postoperative PI and TK according to the established formula, and the absolute value of the gap between ideal LL and actual LL was defined as &#x0394;LL.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2d">
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Quantitative data were expressed as mean&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;standard deviation, and qualitative data were expressed as frequencies or percentages. The correlations between LL and other parameters was determined by the Pearson correlation analysis. Moreover, stepwise multiple linear regression was performed to predict LL (as the dependent variables) based on PI and TK (as the independent variables). Differences between groups were compared with an independent sample t-test and &#x03C7;<sup>2</sup> test. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was plotted to determine the best cut-off value of &#x0394;LL as a predictor of mechanical complications. A <italic>p</italic>-value of &#x003C;0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<p>Among 178 patients in the derivation cohort, 87 were males and 91 were females. The mean age and BMI were 61.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;5.8 years and 23.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.6&#x2005;kg&#x002F;m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The average values of radiographical parameters were 48.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;8.7&#x00B0; for PI, 27.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;10.9&#x00B0; for TK, and &#x2212;46.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;11.6&#x00B0; for LL (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x00A0;1</xref>). Significant correlation was found between LL and PI (<italic>r&#x2009;</italic>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.599, <italic>P&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;</italic>0.001), LL and TK (<italic>r&#x2009;</italic>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.523, <italic>P&#x2009;&#x003C;</italic>&#x2009;0.001) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x00A0;2</xref>). Additionally, a weak correlation between PI and TK (<italic>r&#x2009;</italic>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.201, <italic>P&#x2009;</italic>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.007, TK&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.3&#x002A;PI&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;14.8, <italic>R</italic><sup>2&#x2009;</sup>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.043) was found. Results of multivariate analysis revealed that PI and TK were two significant predictors in the LL model (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x00A0;3</xref>). A novel formula was developed as follows: LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.7&#x002A;PI&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;0.4&#x002A;TK&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;1(<italic>R</italic><sup>2&#x2009;</sup>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.524) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x00A0;1</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Linear correlations of lumbar lordosis (LL) with pelvic incidence (PI) and thoracic kyphosis (TK).</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="fsurg-09-860564-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Demographic and spinopelvic parameters of the asymptomatic subjects.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Variables</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Mean</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Minimum</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Maximum</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Standard deviation</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age (years)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gender (male&#x002F;female)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87&#x002F;91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BMI (kg&#x002F;m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">LL (&#x00B0;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;46.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;15.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;74.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TK (&#x00B0;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PI (&#x00B0;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.7</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="table-fn1"><p><italic>BMI, body mass index; LL, lumbar lordosis; TK, thoracic kyphosis; PI, pelvic incidence.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Correlation between lumbar lordosis and the variables.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Variables</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Correlation Coefficient (r)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic> value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PI (&#x00B0;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.599</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x003C;<italic>0</italic></bold>.<bold><italic>001</italic></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TK (&#x00B0;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.523</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x003C;<italic>0</italic></bold>.<bold><italic>001</italic></bold></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="table-fn2"><p><italic>PI, pelvic incidence; TK, thoracic kyphosis.</italic>
<italic>The bold P-values indicate statistically significant.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Multiple linear regressions.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="left"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Dependent variables</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Independent variables</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">B</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Standard error</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>t</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>R<sup>2</sup></italic></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">LL (&#x00B0;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Constant</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.251</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.540</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.353</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.724</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" rowspan="3">0.524</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">PI (&#x00B0;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.683</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.071</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.601</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x003C;<italic>0</italic></bold>.<bold><italic>001</italic></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">TK (&#x00B0;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.445</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.057</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.807</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x003C;<italic>0</italic></bold>.<bold><italic>001</italic></bold></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="table-fn3"><p><italic>LL, lumbar lordosis; PI, pelvic incidence; TK, thoracic kyphosis.</italic>
<italic>The bold P-values indicate statistically significant.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In total, 93 ASD patients were included in validation cohort and the mean follow-up period was 2.71&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.60 years. Patients in the derivation cohort and validation cohort were matched in terms of age, gender, and BMI (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table&#x00A0;4</xref>). Mechanical complications occurred in 29 patients (PJK (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;18), PJF (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;6), screw pull-out or breakage (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;4), rod breakage (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;1)).</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p>Demographic characteristics of the 2 cohorts.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Variables</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Derivation Cohort</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Validation Cohort</th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><italic>P</italic> value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age (years)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;5.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;4.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.085</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gender (male&#x002F;female)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87&#x002F;91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41&#x002F;52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.453</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BMI (kg&#x002F;m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.482</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="table-fn4"><p><italic>BMI, body mass index.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Univariate analysis showed that patients with mechanical complications were significantly (<italic>P&#x2009;</italic>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.017) older than those without complications (64.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;5.0 vs. 61.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;4.1 years). Analysis of the radiographic parameters showed that a higher postoperative &#x0394;LL (12.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;7.6&#x00B0; vs. 7.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;5.4&#x00B0;, <italic>P&#x2009;</italic>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.001) was significantly associated with increased incidence of mechanical complications. There were no significant differences in other parameters between patients with and without mechanical complications (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table&#x00A0;5</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption><p>A comparison of the demographics and spinopelvic parameters between patients with and without mechanical complications.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Variables</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Mechanical complications (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;29)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">No mechanical complications (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;64)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic> value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4">Demographics</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Age (years)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;5.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;4.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>0</italic></bold>.<bold><italic>017</italic></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Gender (male&#x002F;female)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16&#x002F;13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25&#x002F;39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;BMI (kg&#x002F;m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.1&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.835</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Follow-up (years)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.616</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4">Preoperative parameters (&#x00B0;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;TPA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;14.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;11.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.250</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;TK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;12.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;11.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.514</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;LL</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;21.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;19.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;27.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;20.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.232</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;PI</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;11.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.1&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;12.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.636</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;PT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;10.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;9.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.111</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;SS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.4&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;10.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;9.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.337</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;PI-LL</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;21.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;18.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.132</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4">Postoperative parameters (&#x00B0;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;TPA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.2&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;11.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.8&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;8.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.332</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;TK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;9.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;6.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.186</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;LL</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;42.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;15.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;43.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;11.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.758</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Ideal LL</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;46.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;8.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;44.7&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;8.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.258</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;&#x0394;LL</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;7.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;5.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>0</italic></bold>.<bold><italic>001</italic></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;PI</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;10.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;11.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.516</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;PT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;12.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.9&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;9.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.173</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;SS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.1&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;12.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.0&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;9.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.411</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;PI-LL</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.3&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;16.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.6&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;10.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.431</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="table-fn5"><p><italic>BMI, body mass index; TPA, T1 pelvic angle; TK, thoracic kyphosis; LL, lumbar lordosis; PI, pelvic incidence; PT, pelvic tilt; SS, sacral slope.</italic></p></fn>
<fn id="table-fn6"><p><italic>Ideal LL, 0.7&#x002A;postoperative PI</italic>&#x2009;<italic>&#x002B;</italic>&#x2009;<italic>0.4&#x002A; postoperative TK</italic>&#x2009;<italic>&#x002B;</italic>&#x2009;<italic>1; &#x0394;LL, the absolute value of the gap between actual LL and ideal LL. The bold P-values indicate statistically significant.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Analysis of the ROC curve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x00A0;2</xref>) showed that the optimal threshold of &#x0394;LL as predictor for mechanical complications was 9.8&#x00B0;. Among patients whose &#x0394;LL were <italic>&#x003C;</italic>9.8&#x00B0; and &#x003E;9.8&#x00B0;, the incidence of mechanical complications was 19.4&#x0025; (12&#x002F;62) and 54.8&#x0025; (17&#x002F;31), respectively.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>ROC curve showing the performance of &#x0394;LL in predicting mechanical complications (the area under curve (AUC) was 0.721, the optimal cut-off value of &#x0394;LL was 9.8&#x00B0;). &#x0394;LL: the absolute value of the gap between actual LL and ideal LL.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="fsurg-09-860564-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Restoration of reasonable sagittal alignment has been demonstrated to remarkably decrease the incidence of mechanical complications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). The target parameter PI-10&#x00B0;&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;LL&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;PI&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;10&#x00B0; is commonly used in the reconstruction of sagittal alignment, however, it yields inconsistent results when applied in the prediction of mechanical complications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). In contrast, LL-TK combined with PI-LL is considered to be more effective in predicting sagittal balance in elderly population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). Sagittal alignment may be regarded as an open linear chain connecting the pelvis with the head where the morphology of each successive anatomic segment are closely related and affect the adjacent segment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>). Therefore, it may not be sufficient to consider only the matching relationship between LL and pelvic morphology when evaluating whether LL is reasonable. Although several formulae for predicting LL based on PI and TK have been proposed, such as maxLL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;&#x2212;2.72&#x2013;1.1PI&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;1.1PT-0.31maxTK (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>) and LL&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;45&#x00B0;-TK-PI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>), these formulae either incorporate parameters that change with the position of the spine and pelvis, or simply a rough algebraic sum of the parameters, which may not accurately predict the ideal LL.</p>
<p>A total of 178 asymptomatic Chinese adults over 50 years old were recruited to develop a more accurate prediction formula of LL. In line with the findings of previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>), significant correlations between LL and PI (<italic>r&#x2009;</italic>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.599, <italic>P&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;</italic>0.001), LL and TK (<italic>r&#x2009;</italic>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.523, <italic>P&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;</italic>0.001) were obtained. Theoretically, the pelvis and thoracic spine can be considered to be independently growing structures since they have unique morphologies due to pelvic cavity and rib cage development rather than for an erect posture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>); previous studies also suggested that TK was not correlated with PI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>). Herein, a weak correlation between PI and TK (<italic>r&#x2009;</italic>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.201, <italic>P&#x2009;</italic>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.007, TK&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.3&#x002A;PI&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;14.8, <italic>R</italic><sup>2&#x2009;</sup>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.043) was found, suggesting that a more or less indirect interaction might occur among PI and TK due to a bridging function of the lumbar spine; however, the effect (<italic>R</italic><sup>2&#x2009;</sup>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.043) is not significant in general.</p>
<p>Multivariate regression analysis showed that LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.7&#x002A;PI&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;0.4&#x002A;TK&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;1 (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.524), which can intuitively reflect the matching relationship of LL with PI and TK. In other words, increased PI and TK should be accompanied by a hyperextension of lordosis to accommodate the aforementioned structures, and vice versa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures&#x00A0;3A,B</xref>). Besides, even individuals with similar PI will present different magnitudes of LL due to variance in TK (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures&#x00A0;3B,C</xref>). Therefore, varying lumbar alignment can be attributed to the diversity of pelvic and thoracic morphology. Of note, the prediction efficiency of the formula (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>) was 0.524, indicating that 52.4&#x0025; of the total difference observed in LL can be explained by PI and TK. Thus, the developed formulae outperformed the formulae containing a single variable, such as LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.548&#x002A;TK&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;25.610 (<italic>R</italic><sup>2&#x2009;</sup>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.276) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>) and LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.588&#x002A;PI&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;21.0 (<italic>R</italic><sup>2&#x2009;</sup>&#x003D;&#x2009;0.267) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). Moreover, the variables in the formula are all morphological parameters which are independent of pelvic retroversion. Since the inflection point is variable, especially in pathological conditions, we measured LL and TK based on traditional anatomical landmarks, which seems to be simpler and convenient for application.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Male, 60 years old, with a large pelvic incidence (PI) (60.1&#x00B0;) and thoracic kyphosis (TK) (33.9&#x00B0;) resulting a hyperlordosis (&#x2212;55.5&#x00B0;). (<bold>B</bold>) Female, 62 years old, with a moderate PI (48.3&#x00B0;) and flat TK (8.9&#x00B0;), resulting a flat LL (&#x2212;38.5&#x00B0;). (<bold>C</bold>) Female, 53 years old, with a similar PI (49.1&#x00B0;) to b, but a larger TK (27.9&#x00B0;), resulting a larger LL (&#x2212;46.0&#x00B0;).</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="fsurg-09-860564-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Sagittal alignment overcorrection and undercorrection have both been considered to be a main causes of mechanical complications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). Therefore, patients should be stabilized in a position that does not require or require minimum compensation after corrective surgery. We speculated that postoperative global sagittal alignment which did not satisfy the formula might increase the occurrence of mechanical complications. To investigate the predictive ability of the formula for mechanical complications, a cohort of patients who underwent ASD surgery was analyzed. The 2 cohorts were well matched in terms of demographic information. Besides, to keep the groups as homogeneous as possible, we only included patients with long-segment fusion from the lower thoracic spine to the sacrum&#x002F;iliac. The incidence of mechanical complications was 31.2&#x0025;, and there was higher risk of complications in older patients, which is in line with findings from majority of previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). Moreover, we analyzed the absolute value of the gap between actual LL and the theoretical value derived from postoperative PI and TK. The results showed that a mismatch between postoperative LL and the ideal LL, which was significantly associated with occurrence of mechanical complications (54.8&#x0025; vs. 19.4&#x0025;), illustrating that the formula can effectively predict postoperative mechanical complications.</p>
<p>Our findings suggested that the occurrence of postoperative mechanical complications can be partly attributed to a mismatch between the lumbar alignment and the morphology of the pelvis and thoracic spine. Besides, the cut-off value of the predictor was developed. &#x0394;LL<italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;</italic>9.8&#x00B0; is a protective factor, which indicates that the patient&#x2019;s sagittal lumbar alignment matches with PI and TK, and helps to reduce mechanical complications caused by mismatched spinopelvic parameters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure&#x00A0;4</xref>). Conversely, when &#x0394;LL is increased, postoperative lumbar alignment dose not match with PI and TK, abnormal mechanical stress would be imposed on the implants, instrument vertebrae, and proximal unfused segments. In othe words, postoperative sagittal alignment should satisfy the formula LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.7&#x002A;PI&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;0.4&#x002A;TK&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;1 under ideal conditions; when postoperative LL is overcorrected and does not match with PI and TK, it will be accompanied by an excessive increase in TK, which may lead to the occurrence of PJK (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#x00A0;5</xref>); for patients whose postoperative LL is undercorrected, TK will be correspondingly in a compensatory state, i.e., by reducing the kyphosis to maintain LL matching PI and TK. However, when inadequate LL surpasses the compensative ability of unfused segments, mechanical complications and even sagittal imbalance will occur (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures&#x00A0;6</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>60-year-old female (<bold>A</bold>) preoperative sagittal standing full spine X-rays, pelvic incidence (PI)&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;58.5&#x00B0;, thoracic kyphosis (TK)&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;8.4&#x00B0;, lumbar lordosis (LL)&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;&#x2212;60.5&#x00B0;. (<bold>B</bold>) immediate postoperative X-rays, PI&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;57.8&#x00B0;, TK&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;24.7&#x00B0;, LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;&#x2212;48.3&#x00B0;; ideal LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.7&#x002A;57.8&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;0.4&#x002A;24.7&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;1&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;&#x2212;51.3&#x00B0;, &#x0394;LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;48.3&#x2013;51.3&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;3.0&#x00B0;. (<bold>C</bold>) no mechanical complications at 2-year follow-up.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="fsurg-09-860564-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>66-year-old female. (<bold>A</bold>) preoperative sagittal standing full spine X-rays, pelvic incidence (PI)&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;57.6&#x00B0;, thoracic kyphosis (TK)&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;19.9&#x00B0;, lumbar lordosis (LL)&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;&#x2212;36.1&#x00B0;. (<bold>B</bold>) immediate postoperative X-rays, pelvic incidence&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;56.6&#x00B0;, thoracic kyphosis&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;27.1&#x00B0;, lumbar lordosis (LL)&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;&#x2212;65.1&#x00B0;; ideal LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.7&#x002A;56.6&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;0.4&#x002A;27.1&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;1&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;&#x2212;51.5&#x00B0;, &#x0394;LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;65.1&#x2013;51.5&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;13.6&#x00B0;. (<bold>C</bold>) PJK occurred at 6-month follow-up.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="fsurg-09-860564-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p>65-year-old male (<bold>A</bold>) preoperative sagittal standing full spine X-rays, pelvic incidence (PI)&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;53.6&#x00B0;, thoracic kyphosis (TK)&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;2.4&#x00B0;, lumbar lordosis (LL)&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;11.5&#x00B0;. (<bold>B</bold>) immediate postoperative X-rays, PI&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;53.3&#x00B0;, TK&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;15.5&#x00B0;, LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;&#x2212;26.3&#x00B0;; ideal LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.7&#x002A;53.3&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;0.4&#x002A;15.5&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;1&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;&#x2212;44.5&#x00B0;, &#x0394;LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;26.3&#x2013;44.5&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;18.2&#x00B0;. (<bold>C</bold>) Distal screw pull-out at 2.5-year follow-up.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="fsurg-09-860564-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption><p>60-year-old female. (<bold>A</bold>) preoperative sagittal standing full spine X-rays, pelvic incidence (PI)&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;57.3&#x00B0;, thoracic kyphosis (TK)&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;4.4&#x00B0;, lumbar lordosis (LL)&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;&#x2212;2.6&#x00B0;. (<bold>B</bold>) immediate postoperative X-rays, pelvic incidence&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;57.7&#x00B0;, thoracic kyphosis&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;23.8&#x00B0;, lumbar lordosis (LL)&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;&#x2212;34.6&#x00B0;; ideal LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.7&#x002A;57.7&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;0.4&#x002A;23.8&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;1&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;&#x2212;50.9&#x00B0;, &#x0394;LL&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;34.6&#x2013;50.9&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;16.3&#x00B0;. (<bold>C</bold>) PJK occurred at 2-year follow-up.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="fsurg-09-860564-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>We infer that the formula has the following important aspects. First, it demonstrates that LL should be matched for both PI and TK, and thus can be used by surgeons to understand the mechanisms of lumbar alignment generation. Second, TK is admittedly not completely constant, unlike PI, and may have pathological variation prior to surgery; thus, most important function of this formula is to predict the probability of developing mechanical complications based on the postoperative parameters of the sagittal shape, thereby guiding on follow up and effective intervention. Previous literatures suggested that the optimal PI-LL is not a constant but rather a flexible value determined by individual PI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>). Yilgor et al.(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>) believed that the concept of using PI-LL solely as an absolute numeric value with mean thresholds based on population may be misleading, which can aslo be demonstrated by our results. For example, postoperative LL was within a 10&#x00B0; range of the PI in both <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures&#x00A0;4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>, however, the two patients had different outcomes. Im et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>) found that the degree of LL correction relative to PI was not associated with PJK prevalence in elderly patients with ASD, which also suggested that PI-LL may not be a good predictor of mechanical complications. In our study, the novel formula has advantages in predicting mechanical complications because it is established based on individual sagittal parameters of age specific population and takes into account the interaction between TK and LL.</p>
<p>Some limitations of this study must be discussed. First, given the strict inclusion and exclusion criteria applied, the sample size of elderly asymptomatic patients enrolled was relatively small, which might lead to selection bias. Moreover, the results obtained may not necessarily be applicable to other regions and clinical contexts. Second, some demographic and surgical factors that may affect mechanical complications such as bone mineral density, muscle strength, and surgical technique were not analyzed. Third, we evaluated radiographic and instrumentation-related complications as a whole because of their overlapping biomechanical properties. However, the ability of the model to predict each type of mechanical complication was not been explored. Finally, TK is hard to determine without fixing all thoracic vertebrae due to reciprocal changes (RC) of unfused segments. Adverse RC may limit optimal correction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). Thus, in terms of preoperative design, our formula may be more suitable for patients who require a long instrumented fusion from the proximal thoracic spine to the pelvis to achieve ideal global sagittal realignment. For patients who will undergo fusions from the lower thoracic spine to the sacrum&#x002F;iliac, surgeons need to recognize the physiological TK under the mobility of the thoracic spine to reconstruct a more reasonable lumbar alignment, which requires further verified in long-term follow-up prospective studies with large sample size.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Ideal lumbar lordosis should be matched for both PI and TK. The prediction formula of LL based on PI and TK in asymptomatic adults was established, which is expected to help surgeons to comprehend the mechanisms of lumbar alignment generation and predict occurrence of mechanical complications after ASD surgery.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>JW conceived the study design and drafted the manuscript. QZ and FL supervised the material preparation and data collection. HY and YZ performed the statistical analysis and interpreted the results. JL and XW contributed to the revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was fully supported by the foundation (Grant No. 02220048) from Hunan Goodnight furnishings industry Co., Ltd. All authors declare no other competing interests.</p>
</sec><sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec><sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x0027;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list><title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schwab</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Dubey</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gamez</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>El Fegoun</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Hwang</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Pagala</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population</article-title>. <source>Spine</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>1082</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/01.brs.0000160842.43482.cd</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15864163</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Riouallon</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Bouyer</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Wolff</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Risk of revision surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis: a survival analysis of 517 cases over 25 years</article-title>. <source>Eur Spine J</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>25</volume>:<fpage>2527</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-016-4505-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26964785</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nicholls</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Bae</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Theologis</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Eksi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ames</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Berven</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Factors associated with the development of and revision for proximal junctional kyphosis in 440 consecutive adult spinal deformity patients</article-title>. <source>Spine</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>42</volume>:<fpage>1693</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/brs.0000000000002209</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28441308</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zou</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Characteristics and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after correction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Neurosurg Rev</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>42</volume>:<fpage>671</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10143-018-1004-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29982856</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sebaaly</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gehrchen</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Silvestre</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kharrat</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Bari</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Kreichati</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity and the effect of restoring the spinal shapes according to the Roussouly classification: a multicentric study</article-title>. <source>Eur Spine J</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>904</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-019-06253-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31875922</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pizones</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Moreno-Manzanaro</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>S&#x00E1;nchez P&#x00E9;rez-Grueso</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Vila-Casademunt</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Yilgor</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Obeid</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Restoring the ideal Roussouly sagittal profile in adult scoliosis surgery decreases the risk of mechanical complications</article-title>. <source>Eur Spine J</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>54</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-019-06176-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31641904</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pizones</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Perez-Grueso</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Moreno-Manzanaro</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Vila-Casademunt</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Boissiere</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Yilgor</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Ideal sagittal profile restoration and ideal lumbar apex positioning play an important role in postoperative mechanical complications after a lumbar PSO</article-title>. <source>Spine Deform</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>491</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s43390-019-00005-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31925761</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sebaaly</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Riouallon</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Obeid</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Grobost</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Rizkallah</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Laouissat</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult scoliosis: comparison of four radiological predictor models</article-title>. <source>Eur Spine J</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>613</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-017-5172-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28597300</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rose</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Bridwell</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Lenke</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Cronen</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Mulconrey</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Buchowski</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy</article-title>. <source>Spine</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>34</volume>:<fpage>785</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>91</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819d0c86</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19365245</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Bridwell</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Lenke</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Rhim</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheh</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment following long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: can we predict ideal lumbar lordosis?</article-title> <source>Spine</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>2343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/01.brs.0000238970.67552.f5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16985463</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Correlation between the apex of lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence in asymptomatic adult</article-title>. <source>Eur Spine J</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>420</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-019-06183-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31630265</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lv</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Correlations between the inflection point and spinal sagittal alignment in asymptomatic adults</article-title>. <source>Eur Spine J</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>2272</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-020-06360-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32130529</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Lumbar lordosis minus thoracic kyphosis: a novel regional predictor for sagittal balance in elderly populations</article-title>. <source>Spine</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>41</volume>:<fpage>399</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>403</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/brs.0000000000001231</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26555829</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Zou</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Age-based normal sagittal alignment in Chinese asymptomatic adults: establishment of the relationships between pelvic incidence and other parameters</article-title>. <source>Eur Spine J</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>396</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>404</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-019-06178-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31664567</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Chung</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Shin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Simple prediction method of lumbar lordosis for planning of lumbar corrective surgery: radiological analysis in a Korean population</article-title>. <source>Eur Spine J</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>23</volume>:<fpage>192</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-013-2895-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23897540</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Legaye</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Duval-Beaup&#x00E8;re</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Sagittal plane alignment of the spine and gravity: a radiological and clinical evaluation</article-title>. <source>Acta Orthop Belg</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>213</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16152857</pub-id>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Qiao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Estimation of the ideal lumbar lordosis to be restored from spinal fusion surgery: predictive formula for Chinese population</article-title>. <source>Spine</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>1001</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/brs.0000000000000871</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26356066</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Horton</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bridwell</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Glassman</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Suk</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Cha</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36&#x201D; radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques</article-title>. <source>Spine</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>427</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/01.brs.0000153698.94091.f8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15706340</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shrout</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Fleiss</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability</article-title>. <source>Psychol Bull</source>. (<year>1979</year>) <volume>86</volume>:<fpage>420</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/&#x002F;0033-2909.86.2.420</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18839484</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Glattes</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Bridwell</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Lenke</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Rinella</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Edwards</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis</article-title>. <source>Spine</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>1643</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/01.brs.0000169451.76359.49</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16025035</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yilgor</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Sogunmez</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Yavuz</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Abul</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Boissi&#x00E9;re</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Haddad</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Relative lumbar lordosis and lordosis distribution index: individualized pelvic incidence-based proportional parameters that quantify lumbar lordosis more precisely than the concept of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis</article-title>. <source>Neurosurg Focus</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>43</volume>:<fpage>E5</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3171/2017.8.Focus17498</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29191103</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yilgor</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Sogunmez</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Boissiere</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Yavuz</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Obeid</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Kleinst&#x00FC;ck</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery</article-title>. <source>J Bone Joint Surg Am</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>99</volume>:<fpage>1661</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>72</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2106/jbjs.16.01594</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28976431</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berthonnaud</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Dimnet</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Roussouly</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Labelle</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters</article-title>. <source>J Spinal Disord Tech</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>40</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/01.bsd.0000117542.88865.77</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15687851</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vialle</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Levassor</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Rillardon</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Templier</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Skalli</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Guigui</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects</article-title>. <source>J Joint Surg Am</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>87</volume>:<fpage>260</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2106/jbjs.D.02043</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Voutsinas</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>MacEwen</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Sagittal profiles of the spine</article-title>. <source>Clin Orthop Relat Res</source>. (<year>1986</year>) <volume>210</volume>:<fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3757369</pub-id>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Giglio</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Volpon</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Development and evaluation of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis during growth</article-title>. <source>J Child Orthop</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>1</volume>:<fpage>187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11832-007-0033-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19308494</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moon</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Bridwell</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Theologis</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelly</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Lertudomphonwanit</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Thoracolumbar junction orientation: its impact on thoracic kyphosis and sagittal alignment in both asymptomatic volunteers and symptomatic patients</article-title>. <source>Eur Spine J</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<fpage>1937</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-019-06078-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31342155</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hyun</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheong</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Predictive formula of ideal lumbar lordosis and lower lumbar lordosis determined by individual pelvic incidence in asymptomatic elderly population</article-title>. <source>Eur Spine J</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<fpage>1906</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-019-05955-w</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30903294</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Inami</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Moridaira</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Takeuchi</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Shiba</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Nohara</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Taneichi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Optimum pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis value can be determined by individual pelvic incidence</article-title>. <source>Eur Spine J</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>25</volume>:<fpage>3638</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-016-4563-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27072550</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Im</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Shin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Proximal junctional kyphosis in degenerative sagittal deformity after under- and overcorrection of lumbar lordosis: does overcorrection of lumbar lordosis instigate PJK</article-title>. <source>Spine</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>45</volume>:<fpage>E933</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/brs.0000000000003468</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32675608</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lafage</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Ames</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Schwab</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Klineberg</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Akbarnia</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Changes in thoracic kyphosis negatively impact sagittal alignment after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive radiographic analysis</article-title>. <source>Spine</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>37</volume>:<fpage>E180</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/BRS.0b013e318225b926</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21673626</pub-id></citation></ref></ref-list>
</back>
</article>