AUTHOR=Mohammed Mukasa , Mabelele Mabula Mussa , Mbithe Hanifa , Jusabani Ahmed , Adebayo Philip 

TITLE=A comparative analysis of TOAST and ASCOD criteria in etiologic subtyping of acute ischemic stroke at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Stroke

VOLUME=Volume 4 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/stroke/articles/10.3389/fstro.2025.1598711

DOI=10.3389/fstro.2025.1598711

ISSN=2813-3056

ABSTRACT=BackgroundEtiologic subtyping of ischemic stroke is crucial for determining its treatment, prognosis, and prevention. However, data on the widely utilized TOAST and ASCOD criteria remain scarce in the East African region.AimsThe study aimed to compare the performance of the TOAST and ASCOD systems in subtyping ischemic stroke among stroke patients at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania.MethodsThis was an institutional cross-sectional study. All adults (≥18 years) admitted with a diagnosis of stroke over a six-year period were selected from the registry, and their clinical details reviewed retrospectively. One hundred and thirty (130) patients with first- or second-time acute stroke (as defined by the World Health Organization) were included. Acute stroke was confirmed as ischemic by magnetic resonance imaging. For each index stroke, TOAST and ASCOD criteria were applied. The discordance and level of agreement between the approaches were assessed using McNemar's test χ2 (P-value) and Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ), respectively. The value of κ was interpreted as moderate (0.41–0.6), good (0.61–0.8), very good (0.81–0.9), or excellent (0.91–1.0). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.ResultsThere was no significant discordance between TOAST and the grade 1 level of evidence of ASCOD (ASCOD1) in assigning stroke to all subtypes, except for undetermined etiology χ2 (P = 0.023). Agreement between these systems was good to very good (κ = 0.601 to 0.843, P < 0.01) across the subtypes. TOAST and ASCOD1 failed to determine a definitive etiology in 34.6% and 48.5% of strokes, respectively. On comparing TOAST vs. combined grade of evidence 1 and 2 of ASCOD (ASCOD1,2), there was a discordance in allocation of strokes to the cardioembolic subtype χ2 (P < 0.001), and agreement was moderate (κ = 0.471, P = 0.001). However, the agreement across other identified subtypes was good to very good (κ = 0.601 to 0.875, P ≤ 0.001).ConclusionThere was a good to very good agreement between TOAST and ASCOD1 in etiologic subtyping of ischemic stroke. Further research is warranted to evaluate their consistency across diverse local settings and to explore factors influencing their performance.