<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Sports Act. Living</journal-id><journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Sports and Active Living</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Sports Act. Living</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2624-9367</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fspor.2025.1747465</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Sports celebrity traits and millennial purchasing intentions: a cross-platform mixed-methods study</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>El-Shihy</surname><given-names>Dina</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">&#x002A;</xref><uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3160233/overview"/><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role><role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing</role></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><institution>School of Business and Finance Marketing Department, NewGiza University (NGU)</institution>, <city>Giza</city>, <country country="eg">Egypt</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1"><label>&#x002A;</label><bold>Correspondence:</bold> Dina El-Shihy <email xlink:href="mailto:elshihy.dina@ngu.edu.eg">elshihy.dina@ngu.edu.eg</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-01-26"><day>26</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date>
<volume>7</volume><elocation-id>1747465</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>16</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></date>
<date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; 2026 El-Shihy.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>El-Shihy</copyright-holder><license><ali:license_ref start_date="2026-01-26">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract><sec><title>Introduction</title>
<p>This study examines how sports celebrities&#x0027; personality traits&#x2014;likability, expertise, credibility, and physical attractiveness&#x2014;affect millennials&#x0027; purchasing decisions across Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter. Addressing a gap in prior endorsement research that often treats social media platforms as interchangeable, the study adopts a cross-platform perspective to investigate whether the effectiveness of celebrity traits varies by platform.</p>
</sec><sec><title>Methods</title>
<p>A mixed-methods approach was employed. Quantitative data were collected through a survey of 228 millennials using stratified random sampling, while qualitative insights were obtained from semi-structured interviews with 12 participants. The interviews explored motivations, engagement patterns, and factors contributing to endorsement effectiveness. The study was guided by Source Credibility Theory, the Elaboration Likelihood Model, the Cognitive Response Model, and the Attitude-Toward-the-Ad Model.</p>
</sec><sec><title>Results</title>
<p>The findings indicate that perceived product quality partially mediates the relationship between sports celebrities&#x0027; personality traits and purchase intention. Moreover, the influence of each trait varies significantly across Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter, suggesting that celebrity endorsement effectiveness is contingent on the social media platform.</p>
</sec><sec><title>Discussion</title>
<p>By explicitly comparing multiple social media platforms and integrating quantitative and qualitative evidence, this study advances endorsement research by demonstrating that celebrity trait effectiveness is platform-specific rather than uniform. While all examined traits shape consumer responses, their relative importance differs across platforms, highlighting the need for platform-sensitive endorsement strategies and careful selection of celebrity endorsers. This cross-platform, mixed-method perspective provides nuanced insights into how digital celebrities influence consumer behavior and offers practical recommendations for marketers seeking to optimize influencer strategies across diverse social media channels.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>celebrity endorsement</kwd>
<kwd>endorser personality traits</kwd>
<kwd>millennial consumer behavior</kwd>
<kwd>mixed-methods research</kwd>
<kwd>perceived product quality</kwd>
<kwd>purchase intention</kwd>
<kwd>social media marketing</kwd>
<kwd>sports celebrities</kwd>
</kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><counts>
<fig-count count="1"/>
<table-count count="10"/><equation-count count="1"/><ref-count count="104"/><page-count count="18"/><word-count count="548"/></counts><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name><meta-value>Sports Management, Marketing, and Economics</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
<p>In the digital age, social media has revolutionized how people interact, share information, and promote brands, offering an unparalleled platform for engagement and communication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). Among the various strategies in social media marketing, celebrity endorsements stand out, significantly shaping consumer attitudes and purchase behaviors, particularly among millennials (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>).</p>
<p>A notable trend is the strategic use of sports celebrities in endorsements, leveraging their athletic achievements, fame, and compelling personalities to influence consumers. These figures command significant attention, particularly from millennials, by actively sharing experiences and endorsing brands, making them effective allies for companies seeking to enhance brand visibility and drive consumer interest (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>).</p>
<p>Millennials, a prominent consumer demographic, are profoundly influenced by social media and its content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>). Research on how sports celebrities affect their preferences across platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter is therefore crucial. Each platform appeals to millennials in distinct ways: Instagram&#x0027;s visual focus highlights physical appeal and lifestyle traits, Snapchat&#x0027;s ephemeral content fosters authenticity and trust, and Twitter&#x0027;s immediacy encourages direct engagement and textual credibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>).</p>
<p>Despite growing research on celebrity endorsements, little is known about how specific personality traits&#x2014;likability, expertise, credibility, and physical attractiveness&#x2014;affect millennial purchasing intentions across these platforms. While attributes such as authenticity, charisma, and relatability contribute to endorsement effectiveness, they have not been systematically examined across platform contexts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). Drawing on Source Credibility Theory, the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), the Cognitive Response Model, and the Attitude-Toward-the-Ad Model, this study proposes that celebrity traits influence perceived product quality, which in turn shapes purchasing intentions. By focusing on Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter&#x2014;platforms with unique user demographics and content structures&#x2014;this study explores these dynamics to offer actionable insights for marketers.</p>
<p>This research evaluates the impact of likability, expertise, credibility, and physical attractiveness, along with the mediating role of perceived product quality, on millennial purchasing decisions. In addition to quantitative survey data, qualitative interviews were conducted to explore participants&#x0027; deeper perceptions, emotional responses, and reasoning. By integrating quantitative and qualitative insights, the study provides a richer understanding of how sports celebrity endorsements shape millennial consumer behavior and offers practical guidance for optimizing marketing strategies and strengthening brand engagement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2"><label>2</label><title>Literature review</title>
<p>Celebrity endorsements involve collaboration between brands and public figures to promote products or services, relying on the celebrity&#x0027;s popularity and credibility to elevate brand appeal. Key traits such as likability, expertise, credibility, and physical attractiveness significantly influence endorsement success (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>).</p>
<p>The influence of celebrity endorsements has evolved with social media, where platforms offer celebrities dynamic ways to engage their audiences. By sharing authentic content and real-life insights, they build deeper connections with followers, enhancing the impact of their endorsements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>).</p>
<p>Sports celebrities, known for their athletic prowess and widespread recognition, uniquely shape the digital marketing landscape (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>). Their ability to transcend the sports arena and connect with diverse audiences makes them valuable marketing assets. Platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter cater to millennial preferences for authenticity, visual storytelling, and real-time interaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>).</p>
<p>Moreover, while much of the existing literature focuses on quantitative evaluations of endorsement effectiveness, this study adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining survey-based analysis with qualitative interviews. The interviews enable in-depth exploration of the emotional and cognitive responses elicited by celebrity traits, providing contextual richness that complements the quantitative findings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>).</p>
<sec id="s2a"><label>2.1</label><title>Theoretical foundation</title>
<p>The theoretical underpinnings of this study rely on key frameworks that explain how celebrity personality traits influence perceived product quality and purchasing intentions, and why these effects vary across social media platforms.</p>
<p>Source Credibility Theory posits that an endorser&#x0027;s persuasiveness depends on expertise, trustworthiness, and likability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>). In this study, likability, expertise, credibility, and physical attractiveness represent facets of source credibility shaping consumer evaluations. A celebrity with high expertise enhances perceived product quality, increasing purchase intentions. Similarly, likable and credible celebrities foster positive affect, supporting product-related decisions.</p>
<p>Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) explains how consumers process persuasive messages via central or peripheral routes, depending on involvement and cognitive capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>). On social media, peripheral cues such as likability, attractiveness, and charisma often dominate, as millennials frequently consume content quickly and impressionistically. This lens supports the hypothesis that traits like likability and attractiveness influence both perceived product quality and purchase intentions, especially when consumers do not deeply scrutinize product details.</p>
<p>Cognitive Response Model suggests that consumers actively process endorsement messages, generating cognitive and affective responses that shape attitudes and behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>). Perceived product quality is a key cognitive response: when a celebrity demonstrates expertise or authenticity, consumers interpret the product as reliable and valuable, influencing purchase intentions. This model provides the rationale for including perceived product quality as a mediator between celebrity traits and purchasing decisions.</p>
<p>Attitude-Toward-the-Ad Model emphasizes that favorable attitudes toward advertisements strengthen the link between endorsements and purchase intentions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>). In social media, engaging and authentic content amplifies the persuasive impact of celebrity traits. For instance, emotional engagement with a likable celebrity fosters positive attitudes toward the product, enhancing the effects of credibility and attractiveness on consumer behavior.</p>
<p>Platform-specific mechanisms further clarify these dynamics. On visually rich platforms like Instagram, peripheral cues such as likability and attractiveness dominate, enhancing perceived product quality and purchase intentions. Twitter&#x0027;s text-oriented environment emphasizes central route processing, where expertise and credibility drive cognitive evaluations. Snapchat&#x0027;s informal and ephemeral content facilitates quick trust-building and engagement, leveraging a combination of likability and credibility.</p>
<p>Taken together, these frameworks provide a coherent rationale for hypothesizing how celebrity personality traits influence perceived product quality and purchasing intentions across Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter. Source Credibility Theory explains why traits such as likability, expertise, credibility, and attractiveness enhance message acceptance, elevating perceived product quality&#x2014;a key precursor to behavioral intention. ELM shows that millennials often rely on peripheral cues, making personality traits especially impactful in shaping perceived quality. The Cognitive Response Model clarifies that consumers generate cognitive evaluations based on affective and cognitive impressions of the celebrity. Finally, the Attitude-Toward-the-Ad Model supports the role of perceived product quality as a mediator, as consumers&#x0027; evaluations of the message and the celebrity shape beliefs about the product, influencing purchase decisions.</p>
<p>These theories also guide interpretation of qualitative data, providing a basis for understanding how consumers describe experiences with celebrity endorsements, including perceptions of trust, expertise, and appeal. By examining how traits such as likability and credibility affect millennial purchasing intentions, this study uncovers nuanced mechanisms driving successful endorsements on Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter. The mediating role of perceived product quality underscores the importance of aligning endorsements with consumer expectations to optimize marketing outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2b"><label>2.2</label><title>Hypotheses development</title>
<p>Likability plays a pivotal role in the success of celebrity endorsements, enabling endorsers to forge positive associations with the products they promote. Consumers often perceive products endorsed by likable celebrities as higher quality due to the endorser&#x0027;s personal appeal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). This is especially relevant on visually driven platforms like Instagram, where relatability and personal engagement are paramount. Millennials are drawn to sports celebrities who project warmth and authenticity on social media, creating a sense of trust and personal connection that can translate to the endorsed product (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>). For instance, a sports celebrity sharing glimpses of their personal life and interacting with fans is more likely to enhance the perceived quality and desirability of the products they endorse (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>). Likable celebrities not only foster trust but also elevate the attractiveness and credibility of the associated products, shaping millennial purchasing behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>). According to ELM, Instagram&#x0027;s visually rich and peripheral cue&#x2013;dominated environment amplifies the impact of likability, whereas Snapchat leverages informal and spontaneous interactions to reinforce trust. Twitter relies less on peripheral cues, emphasizing quick impressions rather than detailed engagement. Accordingly, based on Source Credibility Theory and ELM, likability serves as a persuasive cue that increases message acceptance and influences the cognitive evaluation of the product, thereby strengthening both perceived quality and purchasing intentions.
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p><italic>H1: Sports celebrity likability positively influences millennial purchasing intentions on social media platforms (a. Instagram, b. Snapchat, c. Twitter).</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p><italic>H2: Sports celebrity likability positively influences perceived product quality on social media platforms (a. Instagram, b. Snapchat, c. Twitter).</italic></p></list-item>
</list>Expertise is another critical dimension of celebrity endorsements. Endorsers perceived as knowledgeable and authoritative are often regarded as credible, thereby positively shaping consumer attitudes and purchasing intentions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>). This credibility is strengthened when celebrities offer detailed, firsthand insights about the products they endorse, reinforcing consumer trust (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>). For example, a professional athlete endorsing sports equipment or sharing technical knowledge about a product&#x0027;s features can resonate deeply with millennials, who value informed opinions and substantive content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>). Based on the Cognitive Response Model, Twitter&#x0027;s text-focused environment facilitates central route processing, making expertise especially impactful, while Instagram and Snapchat benefit from visual demonstrations of expertise. Consequently, the influence of expertise enhances quality-related beliefs that directly affect purchase intention.
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p><italic>H3: Sports celebrity expertise positively influences millennial purchasing intentions on social media platforms (a. Instagram, b. Snapchat, c. Twitter).</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p><italic>H4: Sports celebrity expertise positively influences perceived product quality on social media platforms (a. Instagram, b. Snapchat, c. Twitter).</italic></p></list-item>
</list>Credibility encompasses the trustworthiness and reliability attributed to a celebrity endorser. It shapes consumer attitudes by enhancing confidence in the endorsed products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>). Authenticity, demonstrated through genuine testimonials and transparent communication, is particularly influential on platforms like Twitter, where users value openness and honesty (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>). Millennials are likely to trust endorsements from credible sports celebrities, especially when the endorser&#x0027;s reputation aligns with their values. Source Credibility Theory suggests that Snapchat&#x0027;s informal interactions allow credibility to be communicated quickly through repeated exposure and casual engagement, whereas Instagram conveys credibility through consistent, authentic storytelling, and Twitter emphasizes textual evidence of trustworthiness. Source Credibility Theory positions trustworthiness as a central driver of message acceptance, making credibility a direct antecedent of both perceived product quality and purchasing intention.
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p><italic>H5: Sports celebrity credibility positively influences millennial purchasing intentions on social media platforms (a. Instagram, b. Snapchat, c. Twitter).</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p><italic>H6: Sports celebrity credibility positively influences perceived product quality on social media platforms (a. Instagram, b. Snapchat, c. Twitter).</italic></p></list-item>
</list>Physical attractiveness, characterized by a celebrity&#x0027;s aesthetic appeal, plays a vital role in capturing consumer attention and enhancing the memorability of endorsements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>). Platforms like Instagram, with their emphasis on visuals, heighten the impact of attractive endorsers. For instance, millennials may be more inclined to associate a physically fit and appealing sports celebrity with high-quality and prestigious products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>). These associations influence product desirability and consumer attitudes. Consistent with ELM, physical attractiveness functions as a peripheral cue, with Instagram highlighting visual appeal, Snapchat leveraging attractiveness in informal story content, and Twitter relying more on cognitive evaluation than aesthetic cues.
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p><italic>H7: Sports celebrity physical attractiveness positively influences millennial purchasing intentions on social media platforms (a. Instagram, b. Snapchat, c. Twitter).</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p><italic>H8: Sports celebrity physical attractiveness positively influences perceived product quality on social media platforms (a. Instagram, b. Snapchat, c. Twitter).</italic></p></list-item>
</list>Perceived product quality acts as a crucial mediator between celebrity traits and consumer behavior. It reflects consumers&#x0027; subjective evaluations of a product&#x0027;s reliability, performance, and overall appeal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">51</xref>). Endorsements by likable, credible, and attractive sports celebrities can enhance perceptions of product quality, fostering greater purchase intent. For instance, millennials may associate a celebrity&#x0027;s expertise or aesthetic appeal with attributes such as durability and prestige, increasing their willingness to buy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">52</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">53</xref>). This mediating role aligns directly with the Attitude-Toward-the-Ad Model and the Cognitive Response Model, and incorporates platform-specific mechanisms where Instagram emphasizes peripheral cues, Twitter emphasizes central processing, and Snapchat balances informal engagement with trust cues.
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p><italic>H9: Perceived product quality positively influences millennial purchasing intentions on social media platforms (a. Instagram, b. Snapchat, c. Twitter).</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p><italic>H10: Perceived product quality mediates the relationship between celebrity likability and purchasing intentions on social media platforms (a. Instagram, b. Snapchat, c. Twitter).</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p><italic>H11: Perceived product quality mediates the relationship between celebrity credibility and purchasing intentions on social media platforms (a. Instagram, b. Snapchat, c. Twitter).</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p><italic>H12: Perceived product quality mediates the relationship between celebrity expertise and purchasing intentions on social media platforms (a. Instagram, b. Snapchat, c. Twitter).</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p><italic>H13: Perceived product quality mediates the relationship between celebrity physical attractiveness and purchasing intentions on social media platforms (a. Instagram, b. Snapchat, c. Twitter).</italic></p></list-item>
</list><xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x00A0;1</xref> summarizes existing studies on sports celebrity endorsements and highlights the research gaps addressed by the present study. While prior research examined general effects of celebrity traits or consumer behavior, few studies investigated trait-specific influences across multiple platforms or incorporated qualitative insights. This study fills these gaps by combining cross-platform SEM analysis with interviews, linking personality traits&#x2014;likability, expertise, credibility, and physical attractiveness&#x2014;to perceived product quality and millennial purchasing intentions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x00A0;1</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float"><label>Table&#x00A0;1</label>
<caption><p>Comparison of existing research on celebrity endorsements and research gaps addressed by the present study.</p></caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="left"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Study</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Major findings</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Research gap addressed by this study</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ferreira et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">54</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sports celebrities&#x0027; marketable lifestyles enhance consumer engagement; brand-celebrity congruence plays a critical role.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Did not examine how specific personality traits (likability, credibility, expertise, attractiveness) operate across different social media platforms. This study explicitly investigates trait effects on Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Baltezarevi&#x0107; &#x0026; Papakonstantinidis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">55</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Reputation of sports celebrities impacts brand standing; inappropriate behavior poses risks.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Prior work overlooks platform-specific variations in trait perception. This study explores how traits differentially influence perceived product quality depending on platform features.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">El-Shihy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Psychological mechanisms, including personality traits, affect consumer engagement with celebrity endorsements.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Focuses only on quantitative or general mechanisms; does not combine qualitative insights to explain why consumers respond differently. This study uses a mixed-methods approach to capture both statistical effects and consumer interpretations.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Kang et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">57</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Celebrity traits influence brand defending and purchase intent among consumers.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Examines behavioral outcomes but lacks cognitive and emotional depth. This study adds qualitative insight to understand how and why traits drive purchase intention across platforms.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Shezi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">58</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Brand personality of sports celebrities boosts identification and purchase intention.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Limited to overall brand personality; does not dissect individual traits or consider platform context. This study provides trait-specific, platform-focused analysis to clarify underlying mechanisms.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Shao et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">59</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Celebrity endorsement influences impulsive buying; credibility and trait alignment are critical.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Focuses on impulsive buying, not perception of product quality or cross-platform differences. This research evaluates both product perception and intention across multiple platforms.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hussain et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">60</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Personality congruence between consumers and celebrities affects endorsement outcomes across platforms.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Explores congruence broadly but lacks mixed-methods depth and detailed examination of each platform&#x0027;s characteristics. This study combines SEM and interviews to explain platform-specific variations.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bush et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">61</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Perceived familiarity and identification influence Generation Y&#x0027;s endorsement responses.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Historical perspective; does not address modern social media platforms or platform-specific mechanisms. This study updates context for millennials using Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter, considering both quantitative and qualitative insights.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TF1"><p>Source: Developed by the authors.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F1" position="float"><label>Figure&#x00A0;1</label>
<caption><p><italic>Conceptual framework</italic>. Source: Developed by the authors.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="fspor-07-1747465-g001.tif"><alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Flowchart illustrating hypotheses (H1 to H9) related to sports celebrities. It shows how likeability, expertise, credibility, and physical attractiveness on Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter influence perceived product quality (H2, H4, H6, H8), which in turn affects millennials' purchasing intentions (H9).</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="methods"><label>3</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="s3a"><label>3.1</label><title>Research design and sampling</title>
<p>This study adopted a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">88</xref>), in which quantitative data collection and analysis were followed by qualitative interviews to provide deeper insight into survey findings. Quantitative results guided the development and focus of the interviews, allowing for rich integration of participants&#x0027; perceptions of sports celebrity endorsements with the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) results.</p>
<p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Egyptian millennials aged 23&#x2013;41 who actively use Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter. Because participants were recruited via online platforms (Google Forms) and social media networks, a true probability sampling frame was not feasible. A stratified quota sampling approach was adopted to approximate representativeness across platforms. Strata were defined by participants&#x0027; primary social media platform usage. Recruitment involved sharing the survey link through social media posts, university networks, and snowballing. Participants were not randomly selected from a master list; rather, quota targets ensured adequate numbers for each platform. Out of the final 228 respondents, 80 were from Instagram, 75 from Snapchat, and 73 from Twitter. Participants could use multiple platforms, with 60&#x0025; reporting multi-platform usage.</p>
<p>Inclusion criteria required participants to be aged 23&#x2013;41, reside in Egypt, and actively use at least one of the target platforms. Exclusion criteria were non-users or participants outside the age range. The minimum sample size was determined using the formula suggested by Nyalungwe et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">62</xref>):<disp-formula><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="UDM1"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2248;</mml:mo><mml:mn>96.04</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">&#x21D2;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>97</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x003C;</mml:mo><mml:mn>228</mml:mn></mml:math></disp-formula>The achieved sample of 228 exceeded the minimum required for analysis. Self-selection bias may have influenced responses. A conventional response rate cannot be calculated due to the open distribution method, which is discussed as a limitation in Section 7.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3b"><label>3.2</label><title>Instrumentation</title>
<p>A structured questionnaire was developed using validated scales from prior literature, with items adapted to the context of sports celebrity endorsements on social media. The questionnaire comprised four sections. The first collected demographic information, including age, gender, and social media usage patterns. The second assessed sports celebrity personality traits&#x2014;likability, expertise, credibility, and physical attractiveness&#x2014;using items adapted from McCormick (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">63</xref>). Items were adjusted to refer specifically to social media posts.</p>
<p>The third section measured perceived product quality, based on Akoglu and &#x00D6;zbek (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">64</xref>), with items reflecting consumer perceptions after exposure to social media content shared by sports celebrities. The fourth section focused on purchasing intentions, adapted from Priyankara et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">65</xref>), capturing the likelihood of purchase following social media exposure. All measurement items, response anchors (1&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;strongly disagree to 5&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;strongly agree), and their sources are provided in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="app1">Appendix A</xref>, with modifications clearly documented.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3c"><label>3.3</label><title>Quantitative data collection and analysis</title>
<p>The quantitative survey was distributed via Google Forms over a one-month period using social media posts, university networks, and snowballing. Procedural remedies reduced common method bias, including anonymous responses, mixing item order, and separating predictors from outcomes.</p>
<p>Data were analyzed using SPSS for descriptive statistics and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to examine relationships among latent constructs. PLS-SEM was chosen over CB-SEM due to the moderate sample size (<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;228) and model complexity, which included multiple latent constructs, mediating paths, and multigroup comparisons. Reliability and validity were assessed using Cronbach&#x0027;s Alpha, Composite Reliability (CR), Average Variance Extracted (AVE), and factor loadings. Discriminant validity was evaluated with both Fornell-Larcker and HTMT methods. Multigroup analysis was conducted based on participants&#x0027; primary platform (Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter), with the Welch&#x2013;Satterthwaite test complementing PLS-MGA to identify significant differences in path coefficients across groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3d"><label>3.4</label><title>Qualitative phase</title>
<p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 participants purposively selected from the survey sample to ensure variation in gender, engagement level, and primary platform (four participants per platform). Participants&#x0027; ages ranged from 25 to 32 years, reflecting the millennial target group. Data saturation was reached when no new themes emerged.</p>
<p>Interviews explored participants&#x0027; perceptions of celebrity traits, platform-specific content, emotional reactions, and the influence of endorsements on perceived product quality and purchase intention. Questions covered both general impressions and platform-specific perceptions, including engagement with content, emotional responses, and judgments of authenticity, expertise, credibility, and attractiveness. Main topics and example prompts guided the discussion to ensure coverage of areas relevant to the hypotheses (see <xref ref-type="sec" rid="app2">Appendix A2</xref> for the full interview guide).</p>
<p>Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">89</xref>). Open coding identified meaningful data segments, axial coding grouped codes into categories, and selective coding identified overarching themes. Coding reliability was ensured through careful review and discussion by the research team, with examples of how raw statements were transformed into codes, categories, and themes provided in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="app3">Appendix A3</xref> for methodological transparency.</p>
<p>Qualitative findings were explicitly integrated with SEM results to confirm and nuance specific relationships, providing richer context for platform-specific variations. Integration strengthened the mixed-methods interpretation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3e"><label>3.5</label><title>Ethical considerations</title>
<p>Participant data were handled anonymously to ensure confidentiality. All participants received explanations of the study objectives, procedures, and voluntary participation requirements. Informed consent was obtained, and ethical approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Badr University in Cairo (BUC).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="results"><label>4</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="s4a"><label>4.1</label><title>Quantitative findings</title>
<sec id="s4a1"><label>4.1.1</label><title>Descriptive analysis</title>
<p>The demographic profile of the 228 respondents is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x00A0;2</xref>. The sample consisted of 136 males (59.65&#x0025;) and 92 females (40.35&#x0025;), offering a reasonably balanced gender distribution. The largest age group was 23&#x2013;27 years (31.14&#x0025;), followed by 27&#x2013;32 years (29.39&#x0025;). Most participants (91.67&#x0025;) held a bachelor&#x0027;s degree, indicating a highly educated sample. Income distribution showed that 37.72&#x0025; earned between 20,000 and 30,000 EGP, suggesting a predominantly middle-income demographic.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float"><label>Table&#x00A0;2</label>
<caption><p>Frequency table for demographics.</p></caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Variable</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Category</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Frequency</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Percentage</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="2">Gender</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Female</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40.35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Male</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">136</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="4">Age</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">23&#x2013;27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">27&#x2013;32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">32&#x2013;36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">36&#x2013;41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.61</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Education</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">High School</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bachelor&#x0027;s degree</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">209</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.67</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Postgraduate Degree</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="4">Income</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x003C;10,000 EGP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">10,000&#x2013;20,000 EGP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">20,000&#x2013;30,000 EGP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.72</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x003E;30,000 EGP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.79</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TF2"><p>Source: Calculations based on sample collected through surveys using SPSS software.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s4a2"><label>4.1.2</label><title>Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)</title>
<p>To assess measurement validity, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted. Common Method Bias (CMB) was addressed using multiple approaches: all VIF values were below 5, indicating no substantial multicollinearity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">66</xref>). Procedural remedies were also applied, including anonymous survey responses, mixing the order of items, and separating predictor and outcome constructs to reduce method bias.</p>
<p>Reliability and convergent validity were assessed using Cronbach&#x0027;s Alpha, Composite Reliability (CR), Average Variance Extracted (AVE), and item-level outer loadings. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x00A0;3</xref>, all constructs&#x2014;including Likability (LIK), Expertise (EXP), Credibility (CRD), Physical Attractiveness (PAT), Perceived Product Quality (PPQ), and Purchase Intention (PI)&#x2014;met the recommended thresholds for reliability and convergent validity (<italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.70; CR&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.70; AVE&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.50). Each item&#x0027;s outer loading exceeded the 0.70 benchmark, confirming that all items contributed meaningfully to their respective constructs. The &#x201C;Status&#x201D; column indicates that all items were retained for further analysis, ensuring consistency with the survey instrument and alignment with SEM and multigroup results.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float"><label>Table&#x00A0;3</label>
<caption><p>Reliability and validity metrics (CFA).</p></caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="left"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Construct</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Item</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Outer Loading</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Cronbach&#x0027;s Alpha</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">CR</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">AVE</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Status</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Likability (LIK)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LIK1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.812</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">LIK2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.788</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">LIK3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.801</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Expertise (EXP)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">EXP1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.845</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.90</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">EXP2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.811</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">EXP3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.829</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Credibility (CRD)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CRD1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.802</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CRD2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.788</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CRD3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.793</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Physical Attractiveness (PAT)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PAT1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.782</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PAT2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.769</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PAT3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.771</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Perceived Product Quality (PPQ)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PPQ1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.831</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PPQ2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.819</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PPQ3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.825</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Purchase Intention (PI)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PI1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.814</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PI2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.805</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PI3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.808</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retained</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Discriminant validity was assessed using the Fornell-Larcker criterion and Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) ratios. All constructs satisfied Fornell-Larcker criteria (square roots of AVE exceeded inter-construct correlations) and HTMT values were below 0.90, confirming satisfactory discriminant validity.</p>
<p>PLS-SEM was employed instead of CB-SEM due to the moderate sample size (<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;228) and the model complexity, which included multiple latent constructs, mediating paths, and multigroup comparisons. PLS-SEM is robust under these conditions and supports both predictive and exploratory analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">90</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4a3"><label>4.1.3</label><title>Structural equation model (SEM)</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table&#x00A0;4</xref> summarizes the direct and indirect effects of celebrity traits on perceived product quality and purchase intention. The SEM results confirm significant effects of all celebrity traits on perceived product quality and purchase intention, with partial mediation through product quality.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float"><label>Table&#x00A0;4</label>
<caption><p>Summary of direct and indirect effects of celebrity traits on product quality and purchase intention.</p></caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Path</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Direct to Perceived Product Quality</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Direct to Purchase Intention</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Indirect via Product Quality</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Likeability</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.398&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.385&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.363<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF4">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Expertise</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.466<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF4">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.446<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF4">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.491<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF4">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Credibility</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.483<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF4">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.301<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF4">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.375<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF4">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Physical attractiveness</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.342<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF4">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.386<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF4">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.399<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF4">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Perceived product quality&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.409<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF4">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TF3"><p>Source: Based on Calculations using Smart PLS.</p></fn>
<fn id="TF4"><p>Note: &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;, &#x002A;&#x002A;, and &#x002A; denote statistical significance at the 1&#x0025;, 5&#x0025;, and 10&#x0025; levels, respectively.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s4a4"><label>4.1.4</label><title>Multigroup analysis</title>
<p>Although multigroup analysis and Welch&#x2013;Satterthwaite tests were conducted to assess differences in path coefficients across platforms, no formal measurement invariance testing (e.g., MICOM) was performed. Cross-group comparisons should therefore be interpreted cautiously, and future studies could include MICOM or other invariance assessments. Groups were defined based on participants&#x0027; primary social media platform (Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter). Sample sizes were 80 for Instagram, 75 for Snapchat, and 73 for Twitter. Participants could report multi-platform use, but the primary platform determined their group assignment. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table&#x00A0;5</xref> presents the direct effects by platform, while <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table&#x00A0;6</xref> presents the mediating effects. The multigroup analysis revealed distinct platform-specific patterns in how celebrity traits influenced consumer responses.</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float"><label>Table&#x00A0;5</label>
<caption><p>Multi-group analysis of direct effects by platform.</p></caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Path</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Instagram (Original Sample)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Instagram (Std. Error)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Snapchat (Original Sample)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Snapchat (Std. Error)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Twitter (Original Sample)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Twitter (Std. Error)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Likeability&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;perceived product quality</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.565&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.243</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.241<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF6">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.323&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.181</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Likeability&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.286&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.076</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.609&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.245</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.114&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.052</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Expertise&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;perceived product quality</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.577&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.305</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.401<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF6">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.704<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF6">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.213</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Expertise&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.138&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.055</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.386&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.151</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.577<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF6">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.194</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Credibility&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;perceived product quality</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.607&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.278</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.347&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.137</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.305&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.103</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Credibility&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.241&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.136</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.36&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.176</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.128<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF6">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.023</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Physical attractiveness&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;perceived product quality</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.141</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.231</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.046</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.163</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.511&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.305</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Physical attractiveness&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.263</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.267</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.192</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.136</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.253&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Perceived product quality&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.263&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.154</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.312<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF6">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.105</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.41<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF6">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.099</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TF5"><p>Source: Based on calculations using smart PLS.</p></fn>
<fn id="TF6"><p>Note: &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;, &#x002A;&#x002A;, and &#x002A; denote statistical significance at the 1&#x0025;, 5&#x0025;, and 10&#x0025; levels, respectively.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float"><label>Table&#x00A0;6</label>
<caption><p>Multi-group analysis of mediating effects by platform.</p></caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Path</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Instagram (Original Sample)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Instagram (Std. Error)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Snapchat (Original Sample)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Snapchat (Std. Error)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Twitter (Original Sample)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Twitter (Std. Error)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Likeability&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;perceived product quality&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.149<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF8">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.015</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.075<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF8">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.022</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.132&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.049</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Expertise&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;perceived product quality&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.152<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF8">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.040</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.125&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.067</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.289&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.115</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Credibility&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;perceived product quality&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.170&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.101</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.108&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.060</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.140<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF8">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.029</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Physical attractiveness&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;perceived product quality&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.037</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.070</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0144</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.057</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.210&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.115</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TF7"><p>Source: Based on Calculations using Smart PLS.</p></fn>
<fn id="TF8"><p>Note: &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;, &#x002A;&#x002A;, and &#x002A; denote statistical significance at the 1&#x0025;, 5&#x0025;, and 10&#x0025; levels, respectively.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The following discussion highlights primary patterns across platforms, with detailed numerical results available in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Tables&#x00A0;5</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">7</xref>, including path coefficients and Welch&#x2013;Satterthwaite test statistics. The multigroup analysis revealed distinct platform-specific patterns in how celebrity traits influenced consumer responses. Likability had the strongest effect on purchase intention on Snapchat (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.609), reflecting the platform&#x0027;s informal and peer-driven environment, where relatable traits tend to resonate strongly with users. Expertise emerged as the dominant trait on Twitter, showing the greatest impact on perceived product quality (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.704) and purchase intention (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.577), aligning with the platform&#x0027;s information-oriented nature, where credibility and knowledge are especially valued. Physical attractiveness was only significant on Twitter, suggesting that users engage more selectively with visually appealing content in this context. The effects of credibility varied across platforms, emphasizing differences in how users respond to visual appeal versus peer validation. These findings underscore the importance of developing endorsement strategies that are tailored to the characteristics and expectations of each social media platform.</p>
<table-wrap id="T7" position="float"><label>Table&#x00A0;7</label>
<caption><p>Welch-Satterthwaite test comparing path coefficients across platforms.</p></caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Path</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Instagram vs Snapchat</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Instagram vs Twitter</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Snapchat vs Twitter</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Likeability&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;perceived product quality</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.324<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF10">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.242<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF10">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;0.082&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Likeability&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;0.323<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF10">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.172<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF10">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.495&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Expertise&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;perceived product quality</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.176<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF10">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;0.127<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF10">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;0.303&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Expertise&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;0.248<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF10">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;0.439&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;0.191<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF10">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Credibility&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;perceived product quality</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF10">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.302&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.042</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Credibility&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;0.119<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF10">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.113<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF10">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.232&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Physical attractiveness&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;perceived product quality</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.095&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;0.37<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TF10">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;0.465&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Physical attractiveness&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.071&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;0.061</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Perceived product quality&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;purchase intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;0.049</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;0.147&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;0.098&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TF9"><p>Source: Based on Calculations using Smart PLS.</p></fn>
<fn id="TF10"><p>Note: &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;, &#x002A;&#x002A;, and &#x002A; denote statistical significance at the 1&#x0025;, 5&#x0025;, and 10&#x0025; levels, respectively.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s4a5"><label>4.1.5</label><title>Welch-Satterthwaite test</title>
<p>The Welch&#x2013;Satterthwaite test was employed as a complementary approach to PLS-MGA and permutation tests to compare path coefficients across groups with unequal variances and sample sizes. This method helped identify statistically significant differences in the strength of relationships that may not be fully captured by PLS-MGA alone. The results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">Table&#x00A0;7</xref> indicate that expertise exerted a relatively more negative effect on purchase intention on Twitter compared to Instagram or Snapchat, suggesting that users on this platform are more critical or selective regarding expert endorsements. Additionally, physical attractiveness showed stronger negative effects when comparing Snapchat and Twitter, highlighting that the influence of visual appeal differs across platforms. These findings have important practical implications, indicating that endorsement strategies should emphasize the dominant celebrity trait for each platform and consider platform-specific user expectations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4a6"><label>4.1.6</label><title>Model fit and predictive power</title>
<p>The R<sup>2</sup> values indicate strong explanatory power (61.7&#x0025; for perceived product quality; 57.9&#x0025; for purchase intentions). Q<sup>2</sup> values were positive across all constructs, confirming predictive relevance. The SRMR was 0.029, indicating excellent model fit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">67</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4b"><label>4.2</label><title>Qualitative findings</title>
<p>To complement the quantitative analysis, qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 12 millennial participants selected from the original survey pool. These interviews were designed to deepen understanding of how sports celebrity traits influence perceptions of product quality and purchase intention across Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically, resulting in four key themes that support and extend the statistical findings.</p>
<sec id="s4b1"><label>4.2.1</label><title>Authentic engagement enhances likability</title>
<p>Participants often linked likability to more than just physical appearance. They emphasized how a celebrity&#x0027;s genuine communication style and personal content shaped impressions, particularly on Instagram. Visual storytelling and casual, everyday moments helped build emotional connection.
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>One male participant (primary platform: Instagram, age 27) explained: &#x201C;<italic>I follow a few athletes who post behind-the-scenes stuff&#x2014;family dinners, workouts, even silly moments. That&#x0027;s when I start to feel like I know them. It&#x0027;s not just a brand talking&#x2014;it&#x0027;s them.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>One female participant (primary platform: Instagram, age 26) shared: &#x201C;<italic>If I like the person, I&#x2019;m more open to what they&#x2019;re promoting&#x2014;even if I hadn&#x2019;t considered that product before.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>One male participant (primary platform: Snapchat, age 30) added: &#x201C;<italic>Even short stories or candid clips make me feel like I understand their personality. That makes me trust their recommendations more.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>One female participant (primary platform: Twitter, age 28) noted: &#x201C;<italic>Sometimes I don&#x2019;t even care about the product at first. If I like the athlete, I&#x2019;ll pay attention and might end up buying it.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
</list>These insights support the quantitative result showing that likability had the strongest influence on perceived product quality on Instagram (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.565), highlighting that emotionally engaging content contributes to stronger brand association.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4b2"><label>4.2.2</label><title>Expertise must be contextual and demonstrated</title>
<p>Participants described expertise as effective when the celebrity demonstrated specific product knowledge&#x2014;especially for performance-related items. Twitter was noted as a suitable platform for this, as it allows for detailed written content and product explanations.
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>One male participant (primary platform: Twitter, age 31) noted: &#x201C;<italic>When a footballer breaks down how their boots help them pivot better or gives technical feedback on a supplement&#x2014;it sticks. That&#x0027;s what I want to hear.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>One female participant (primary platform: Twitter, age 29) added: &#x201C;<italic>Twitter is where I go for insights. I don&#x2019;t care if they look good&#x2014;I care if they know what they&#x2019;re talking about.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>One male participant (primary platform: Instagram, age 26) explained: &#x201C;<italic>Even on Instagram, I notice when they share tips or explain why they choose a product. That shows real expertise.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>One female participant (primary platform: Snapchat, age 27) said: &#x201C;<italic>I trust celebrities who show me exactly how they use a product. Their knowledge matters more than appearance.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
</list>These comments align with SEM findings showing expertise had the highest effect on purchase intention on Twitter (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.577), emphasizing that platform features shape how traits like expertise are perceived.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4b3"><label>4.2.3</label><title>Trust and credibility are built through consistency</title>
<p>Credibility was tied to how consistently a celebrity aligned with the products they endorsed and whether they showed authentic behavior over time. Participants emphasized the value of transparency, especially on Snapchat, which they saw as more candid and less curated.
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>One male participant (primary platform: Snapchat, age 30) explained: &#x201C;<italic>If I see someone pushing different brands every week, I stop trusting them. But when it&#x0027;s someone who&#x0027;s been with the same brand for a while&#x2014;and shows how they use it&#x2014;I take it seriously.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>One female participant (primary platform: Snapchat, age 25) added: &#x201C;<italic>Snapchat feels more real. You catch them off guard sometimes. That&#x0027;s where I judge if they actually believe in the product.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>One male participant (primary platform: Twitter, age 32) noted: &#x201C;<italic>I look at how consistent their endorsements are. If it matches their values and performance, I trust them more.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>One female participant (primary platform: Instagram, age 26) said: &#x201C;<italic>Credibility is about transparency. If they genuinely use the product, I feel confident following their advice.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
</list>These responses align with quantitative findings, where credibility significantly influenced purchase intention on Snapchat (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.360), indicating that informal, real-time content can foster trust.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4b4"><label>4.2.4</label><title>Physical attractiveness is context-dependent and aspirational</title>
<p>While attractiveness was acknowledged as influential, participants emphasized that it was most effective when paired with performance, discipline, or relevance to the product. Twitter emerged as the platform where this blend of traits was most noticed.
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>One male participant (primary platform: Twitter, age 31) shared<italic>: &#x201C;Yeah, looks catch attention&#x2014;but if that person clearly trains hard and maintains discipline, I respect that. It tells me their product might reflect that same quality.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>One female participant (primary platform: Twitter, age 28) added: &#x201C;<italic>Attractiveness matters, but only when it connects with their performance. I&#x2019;d buy protein powder from someone who looks like they use it&#x2014;not just someone with a filter.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>One male participant (primary platform: Instagram, age 26) noted: &#x201C;<italic>On Instagram, attractiveness draws me in, but performance and authenticity keep me engaged.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>One female participant (primary platform: Snapchat, age 27) said: &#x201C;<italic>I notice effort and discipline more than looks, but the combination makes the endorsement feel credible.&#x201D;</italic></p></list-item>
</list>These comments reinforce the quantitative result that physical attractiveness had the strongest effect on perceived product quality on Twitter (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.511), highlighting the importance of relevance and context in interpreting this trait.</p>
<p>Overall, the qualitative themes offer emotional and interpretive depth to the statistical relationships found in the SEM model. They illustrate how personality traits&#x2014;especially likability, expertise, credibility, and physical attractiveness&#x2014;are understood and evaluated by consumers in platform-specific ways. These insights support the partial mediation role of perceived product quality, showing that consumer responses are shaped by both emotional connection and trait-based cues, which together inform millennial purchasing decisions across platforms.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="discussion"><label>5</label><title>Discussion</title>
<p>The positive association between sports celebrities&#x0027; likability and millennial purchasing intentions across Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter is consistent with earlier studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">68</xref>) and can be interpreted through ELM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">91</xref>). According to this model, when consumers like a celebrity endorser, they are more likely to rely on surface-level cues, such as appearance or personality. For millennials, the presence of likable sports celebrities appears to foster positive emotions and associations, which are linked to greater interest in the endorsed product. This supports the view that likability functions as a heuristic cue that enhances the celebrity&#x0027;s appeal and is associated with consumers&#x0027; product-related evaluations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>). Qualitative findings converge with these results, as participants frequently connected likability with emotional connection and relatability&#x2014;especially on Instagram. Respondents reported feeling &#x201C;<italic>close&#x201D;</italic> to athletes who posted personal, lifestyle-focused content, which was associated with enhanced willingness to trust endorsements. Platform-specific differences were evident: Instagram&#x0027;s visual and lifestyle-oriented features facilitate emotional storytelling, strengthening likability, whereas Snapchat or Twitter content is often perceived as more transient or informational.</p>
<p>In a similar vein, the positive relationship between credibility and millennial purchasing intentions aligns with the Source Credibility Model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">69</xref>) and recent research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">70</xref>). Celebrities perceived as credible are commonly viewed as trustworthy and reliable, which may enhance the persuasiveness of their endorsements. This finding is consistent with prior studies highlighting credibility as a key component of endorsement effectiveness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">71</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">72</xref>). Interview participants reinforced these patterns, noting that credibility was closely tied to consistent behavior and long-term product use. Several respondents mentioned discontinuing trust in endorsers who &#x201C;<italic>promoted something different every week,&#x201D;</italic> underscoring the importance of perceived authenticity. Platform differences also emerged, as Snapchat&#x0027;s informal and real-time content enabled users to assess authenticity and identify inconsistencies, potentially amplifying the role of credibility in shaping purchase-related judgments.</p>
<p>Beyond credibility, the observed association between expertise and purchasing intentions is also consistent with the Source Credibility Model, which suggests that consumers place greater weight on recommendations from endorsers perceived as knowledgeable (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">69</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">73</xref>). Expertise was linked to more favorable product evaluations and greater confidence in purchase decisions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">74</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">76</xref>). Qualitative findings mirrored the quantitative results, particularly on Twitter, where participants valued detailed explanations and technical insights. These platform-specific patterns can be attributed to Twitter&#x0027;s text-oriented environment, which facilitates central-route processing and the communication of expertise more effectively than visually dominant or ephemeral platforms.</p>
<p>In contrast to cognitive traits, the influence of physical attractiveness was generally consistent with previous research, including findings associated with the halo effect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">77</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">78</xref>). Attractive celebrities tended to capture attention and generate favorable initial impressions, although this trait was not uniformly influential across platforms. Several interviewees associated attractiveness with effort, discipline, and authenticity&#x2014;particularly on Twitter&#x2014;suggesting that physical appeal may interact with cognitive evaluations rather than operate solely as a visual cue. These qualitative insights add nuance to the SEM results, showing that attractiveness effects are context-dependent rather than universal.</p>
<p>Taken together, these trait-based evaluations converged most strongly through perceptions of product quality. Perceived product quality emerged as a central construct associated with millennial purchasing intentions, supporting prior research emphasizing quality perceptions in consumer decision-making (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">79</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">81</xref>). Qualitative responses further clarified this relationship, as participants frequently linked perceived quality to observable product use, demonstrated reliability, or detailed explanations by the celebrity. Notably, some respondents reported refraining from purchase when endorsements appeared inconsistent, fake, or inauthentic, reinforcing the role of perceived product quality as an intervening mechanism between celebrity traits and purchase intentions.</p>
<p>The mediating role of perceived product quality aligns with the Cognitive Response Model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">91</xref>), which emphasizes consumers&#x0027; internal evaluations of endorsement messages. Participants described assessing whether a celebrity&#x0027;s lifestyle and personality aligned with the promoted product, with one noting: &#x201C;<italic>If they live the lifestyle they&#x2019;re promoting, I believe the product works. If not, I scroll past&#x201D;</italic>. These qualitative insights complement the SEM findings, illustrating how cognitive evaluations are shaped by both emotional engagement and trait-based cues. Overall, the integration of quantitative and qualitative results highlights how celebrity traits, perceived product quality, and platform-specific affordances jointly shape millennial purchasing decisions, offering theoretically grounded and practically relevant implications for cross-platform endorsement strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6"><label>6</label><title>Implications</title>
<p>This research offers clear and original contributions by providing robust, mixed-method evidence on how sports celebrity endorsements shape millennial consumer behavior across distinct social media platforms. By integrating cross-platform SEM with qualitative interviews, the study moves beyond prior single-platform or trait-aggregated approaches and offers a more granular understanding of endorsement effectiveness. The findings generate actionable insights for scholars and practitioners by demonstrating not only which celebrity traits matter, but also the mechanisms through which they influence perceived product quality and purchasing intentions under platform-specific conditions.</p>
<p>The inclusion of qualitative perspectives further strengthens these contributions by explaining how and why consumers interpret endorsement cues differently across Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter, thereby deepening the interpretive and explanatory understanding of the quantitative results.</p>
<sec id="s6a"><label>6.1</label><title>Theoretical implications</title>
<p>This study advances theory-building by demonstrating that the influence of sports celebrity traits is platform-dependent rather than universal, thereby challenging earlier assumptions that endorsement strategies function similarly across social media environments. A key theoretical contribution lies in showing that traits such as likability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>), expertise (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">82</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">83</xref>), credibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">84</xref>), and physical attractiveness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">85</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">86</xref>) exhibit varying levels of effectiveness depending on the platform through which endorsements are communicated. The qualitative findings reinforce this interpretation by revealing that Instagram&#x0027;s visual modality amplifies likability, Snapchat&#x0027;s informal and ephemeral environment heightens the importance of authenticity and relatability, and Twitter&#x0027;s text-driven format foregrounds expertise and informational value.</p>
<p>These findings highlight the need for future theoretical models of celebrity endorsement to explicitly incorporate platform context, including content modality, interaction norms, and platform-specific affordances. Rather than treating social media as a homogeneous communication environment, the results suggest that consumer evaluations are shaped by the functional purpose and interaction style of each platform, with users relying on different evaluative cues accordingly. This insight extends prior endorsement research by conceptualizing consumer engagement as a multi-platform and context-sensitive process.</p>
<p>In addition, this research extends existing frameworks such as the Cognitive Response Model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">87</xref>) by identifying perceived product quality as a central mechanism linking celebrity traits to purchasing intentions. While earlier studies acknowledged cognitive evaluations in endorsement effectiveness, they often paid limited attention to how product quality perceptions emerge from trait-based cues. The present findings, supported by both SEM results and qualitative insights, indicate that perceived quality integrates emotional responses (e.g., likability), trust-based judgments (e.g., credibility), and competence-based assessments (e.g., expertise), thereby offering a more comprehensive explanation of endorsement influence.</p>
<p>Finally, the study addresses a key limitation in prior literature that frequently treated social media platforms as interchangeable endorsement contexts. The findings demonstrate that millennials engage with platforms in distinct ways, seeking inspirational and lifestyle-oriented content on Instagram, spontaneous and authentic moments on Snapchat, and informational or expertise-driven cues on Twitter. These patterns underscore the importance of incorporating platform-specific user expectations and evaluative pathways into future theoretical development, particularly with respect to the balance between emotional and cognitive processing in digital persuasion.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6b"><label>6.2</label><title>Practical implications</title>
<p>From a managerial perspective, this study offers clear, evidence-based guidance for designing more effective sports celebrity endorsement strategies across social media platforms. A central practical contribution lies in demonstrating that endorsement success depends not only on selecting the &#x201C;right&#x201D; celebrity, but on aligning specific celebrity traits with the functional logic of each platform.</p>
<p>Likability emerged as a consistent driver of perceived product quality and purchasing intentions, particularly on visually oriented platforms. Brands targeting millennial consumers should therefore prioritize endorsers who convey warmth, relatability, and authenticity rather than relying solely on fame or performance credentials. Content strategies that showcase personal narratives, humor, and everyday moments are especially effective on Instagram and Snapchat, where emotional connection plays a dominant role. Interview insights confirm that behind-the-scenes and lifestyle-oriented posts increase trust and perceived realism, thereby strengthening endorsement impact.</p>
<p>Credibility represents another critical managerial consideration, particularly in environments where consumers actively assess authenticity. The findings indicate that frequent brand switching or inconsistent endorsements erode consumer trust, suggesting that long-term partnerships and visible product usage are more effective than short-term promotional campaigns. Snapchat&#x0027;s real-time and informal nature appears especially effective for signaling authenticity, making it a valuable channel for reinforcing credibility through unscripted or spontaneous content.</p>
<p>Expertise was shown to be particularly influential in shaping perceptions of product quality and purchase confidence, especially on Twitter. For technical, performance-related, or high-involvement products, brands should collaborate with athletes whose experience and knowledge are clearly relevant to the offering. The results suggest that detailed explanations, personal usage accounts, and informational content outperform image-based appeals in text-driven environments, reinforcing the need for message&#x2013;platform congruence.</p>
<p>Physical attractiveness, while still relevant, was found to be insufficient as a standalone strategy. Its influence was strongest when combined with perceived authenticity, relevance, and demonstrated product fit, particularly in categories such as fitness, health, and wellness. This finding cautions managers against overreliance on aesthetic appeal and highlights the importance of holistic endorser&#x2013;brand alignment.</p>
<p>Finally, a major practical contribution of this research is the demonstration that each platform requires a distinct endorsement strategy rather than content replication across channels. Instagram is best suited for emotionally engaging, visually rich storytelling; Twitter is optimal for expertise-driven, informational messaging; and Snapchat facilitates rapid trust-building through informal and authentic interactions. Marketers who adapt endorsement content, tone, and format to these platform-specific affordances are more likely to enhance perceived product quality and purchasing intentions among millennial consumers.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s7"><label>7</label><title>Limitations and future recommendations</title>
<p>This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting its findings. First, the sample size of 228 millennials may constrain generalizability. Future research should seek to include larger, more diverse samples. Second, reliance on online surveys and stratified sampling may have contributed to the overrepresentation of social media&#x2013;active individuals with a strong interest in sports celebrities, potentially biasing results. Notably, 91.67&#x0025; of respondents held a bachelor&#x0027;s degree, which may restrict the representativeness of findings across education levels. Self-reported data also involves risks of social desirability bias or misjudgment of personal behavior. Future studies could also incorporate behavioral tracking or observational tools to enhance accuracy.</p>
<p>Despite assessing multicollinearity (VIF&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;5) to mitigate common method bias, the use of self-reported, cross-sectional surveys still raises concerns regarding potential common method variance, which should be considered when interpreting relationships among constructs. Additionally, the study context is limited geographically and culturally, as most participants are likely from similar backgrounds in Egypt, which may limit generalizability to other regions or cultures. The sample is relatively homogeneous with respect to age (23&#x2013;41 years), education (mostly bachelor&#x0027;s degrees), and likely middle-income status, further constraining generalizability beyond comparable millennial populations.</p>
<p>Although Welch&#x2013;Satterthwaite tests were employed as a complementary approach to PLS-MGA to account for unequal variances and sample sizes, formal measurement invariance testing (e.g., MICOM) was not undertaken. Therefore, cross-group comparisons should be interpreted with caution. Future research should prioritize conducting MICOM or other invariance assessments prior to MGA to support valid comparisons across platforms.</p>
<p>The study focuses exclusively on Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter, which were historically prominent in sports endorsement research. However, other platforms such as TikTok and YouTube have become increasingly influential, and future research should consider cross-platform comparisons to capture a more comprehensive view of endorsement effectiveness in the current digital ecosystem.</p>
<p>The cross-sectional design limits the ability to draw causal inferences. Longitudinal or experimental designs are recommended to better assess changes over time. Future work should also explore different age cohorts (e.g., Gen Z, Gen X), compare platforms and industries, and further investigate how endorsement traits such as attractiveness or expertise are perceived across contexts. Such comparative approaches may strengthen the depth and applicability of endorsement research and support theory-building on cross-platform endorsement effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="conclusions"><label>8</label><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This research clarifies how sports celebrities&#x0027; personality traits&#x2014;likability, expertise, credibility, and physical attractiveness&#x2014;shape millennial consumers&#x0027; reactions to product endorsements on Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter. Using a mixed-methods approach, combining a survey of 228 active users with in-depth interviews of 12 participants, the study finds that each trait plays a distinct role: likability captures attention and fosters emotional engagement (ELM), expertise and credibility build trust and enhance perceived product quality (Source Credibility Theory; Cognitive Response Model), and physical attractiveness strengthens affective evaluation and endorsement memorability (ELM; Attitude-Toward-the-Ad Model).</p>
<p>The study underscores the importance of platform-specific strategies. Instagram seems particularly suited to promoting likability through images and stories, Twitter is more effective for demonstrating expertise and credibility, and Snapchat supports endorsements that feel spontaneous and authentic. The interviews reinforced these platform differences, showing that users tend to seek emotional connection on Instagram, reliable information on Twitter, and authenticity on Snapchat.</p>
<p>Perceived product quality emerged as a central mediating factor, with consumers forming evaluations based on how trustworthy, consistent, or relatable the celebrity appears. Qualitative insights revealed that these evaluations often occur quickly, relying on emotional shortcuts.</p>
<p>By combining quantitative and qualitative approaches, this study offers a more comprehensive understanding of how celebrity traits and platform dynamics relate to consumer behavior. The findings support and extend existing theories of celebrity endorsement, illustrating how Source Credibility Theory, ELM, Cognitive Response Model, and Attitude-Toward-the-Ad Model together help explain the mechanisms linking traits to perceived quality and purchase intentions. This dual approach adds theoretical depth and provides actionable guidance for marketers seeking to optimize engagement with millennials across diverse social media platforms.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="data-availability"><title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ethics-statement"><title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving humans received full ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of Badr University in Cairo. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="author-contributions"><title>Author contributions</title>
<p>DE-S: Resources, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Investigation, Software, Visualization, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Validation, Data curation, Project administration, Conceptualization, Supervision, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s13" sec-type="COI-statement"><title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s14" sec-type="ai-statement"><title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. The author acknowledges the use of an AI-powered language model to assist with editing and proofreading the manuscript. While the AI tool was used to enhance the grammar, spelling, and clarity of the written English, the core content, ideas, and analysis presented are the original work of the author.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s15" sec-type="disclaimer"><title>Publisher&#x0027;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list><title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ausat</surname> <given-names>AMA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The role of social media in shaping public opinion and its influence on economic decisions</article-title>. <source>Technol Soc Perspect (TACIT)</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>1</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61100/tacit.v1i1.37</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Odoom</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Digital content marketing and consumer brand engagement on social media-do influencers&#x2019; brand content moderate the relationship?</article-title> <source>J Mark Commun</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>31</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>491</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>514</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/13527266.2023.2249013</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>An Influencer&#x2019;s World: A Behind-the-Scenes Look at Social Media Influencers and Creators</source>. <publisher-loc>Iowa City, IA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University of Iowa Press</publisher-name> (<year>2023</year>).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Klostermann</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mei&#x00DF;ner</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Max</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Decker</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Presentation of celebrities&#x2019; private life through visual social media</article-title>. <source>J Bus Res</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>156</volume>:<fpage>113524</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113524</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sahore</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mendiratta</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Digital social engagements and knowledge sharing among sports fans: role of interaction, identification, and interface</article-title>. <source>Technol Forecast Soc Change</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>195</volume>:<fpage>122792</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122792</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ozuem</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Willis</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ranfagni</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Howell</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rovai</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Examining the role of social media influencers in service failure and recovery strategies: an empirical investigation of millennials&#x2019; views</article-title>. <source>Inform Technol Peopl</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>37</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>2035</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/ITP-05-2022-0371</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>John</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pujari</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Majumdar</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Impact of social media marketing on purchasing intentions of luxury brands: the case of millennial consumers in the UAE</article-title>. <source>Int J Electron Mark Retail</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>14</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>275</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1504/IJEMR.2023.131812</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rodrigo</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mendis</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Impact of social media influencers&#x2019; credibility on millennial consumers&#x2019; green purchasing behaviour: a concept paper on personal and social identities</article-title>. <source>Manag Matter</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>20</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>134</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/MANM-12-2022-0113</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nikolinakou</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Phua</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Do human values find genuine expression on social media platforms? The influence of human values on millennials&#x2019; social media activities</article-title>. <source>Internet Res</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>34</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>538</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/INTR-03-2022-0182</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ben Amor</surname> <given-names>NEH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mzoughi</surname> <given-names>MN</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Do Millennials&#x2019; motives for using Snapchat influence the effectiveness of Snap Ads?</article-title> <source>SAGE Open</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>13</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>21582440231187875</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/21582440231187875</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alsulaiman</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Understanding Saudi millennials news consumption in a digital world</article-title>. <source>Online J Commun Media Technol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>12</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30935/ojcmt/12181</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Papadopoulos</surname> <given-names>DIH</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>The influence of elite athletes on instagram on the behavioral intent towards physical activity among young adults</source> (Doctoral dissertation). (<year>2023</year>).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lou</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>CR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Influencer marketing on social media: how different social media platforms afford influencer&#x2013;follower relation and drive advertising effectiveness</article-title>. <source>J Curr Issues Res Advert</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>44</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>60</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10641734.2022.2124471</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hazari</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sethna</surname> <given-names>BN</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A comparison of lifestyle marketing and brand influencer advertising for generation Z instagram users</article-title>. <source>J Promot Manag</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>29</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>491</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>534</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10496491.2022.2163033</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jorge</surname> <given-names>CIBCM</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>What is the impact of influencer marketing through instagram, by promoting fitness apparel, on female consumer behaviour?</source> (Doctoral dissertation). (<year>2023</year>).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effectiveness of product placement in streaming TV series: the roles of product involvement, placement prominence, and celebrity endorsement</article-title>. <source>J Mark Commun</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>31</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>595</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>617</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/13527266.2023.2258374</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Frank</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitsumoto</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>An extended source attractiveness model: the advertising effectiveness of distinct athlete endorser attractiveness types and its contextual variation</article-title>. <source>Eur Sport Manag Q</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>23</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>1091</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>114</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/16184742.2021.1963302</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sudjawoto</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andriansyah</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sugiharto</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arifin</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The contribution of celebrity endorsement on customer decision</article-title>. <source>Asian J Econ Bus Account</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>23</volume>(<issue>17</issue>):<fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9734/ajeba/2023/v23i171041</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zolkepli</surname> <given-names>IA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Omar</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ab Rahim</surname> <given-names>NH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tahir</surname> <given-names>SNKM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tiwari</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Social media advertising, celebrity endorsement, and electronic word-of-mouth effect on health supplement purchasing behaviour</article-title>. <source>Asian J Res Bus Manag</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>4</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>99</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nichols</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shapiro</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The impact of authenticity on celebrity athlete social media endorsement messaging</article-title>. <source>Sport Market Q</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>32</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32731/SMQ.323.092023.01</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al Sari</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alkhaldi</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alsaffar</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alkhaldi</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Almaymuni</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alnaim</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Sentiment analysis for cruises in Saudi Arabia on social media platforms using machine learning algorithms</article-title>. <source>J Big Data</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>9</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40537-022-00568-5</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="confproc"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Astori</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>RG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carlos</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Are social media users &#x201C;Online&#x201D; with public libraries?</article-title> <conf-name>Marketing and Smart Technologies: Proceedings of ICMarkTech 2021</conf-name>. <publisher-name>Springer Singapore</publisher-name> (<year>2022</year>). pp. <fpage>543</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>, Vol. <volume>2</volume>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jaramillo-Dent</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>P&#x00E9;rez-Rodr&#x00ED;guez</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>&#x0023;Migrantcaravan: the border wall and the establishment of otherness on Instagram</article-title>. <source>New Media Soc</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>23</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1461444819894241</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Perception of advertisements with celebrity endorsement among mature consumers</article-title>. <source>J Mark Commun</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>28</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/13527266.2020.1843063</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Exploratory study about audience response to product endorsements by online DIY celebrities and traditional celebrities</article-title>. <source>Young Consum</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>22</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>169</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>84</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/YC-10-2020-1224</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walten</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wiedmann</surname> <given-names>KP</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>How product information and source credibility affect consumer attitudes and intentions towards innovative food products</article-title>. <source>J Mark Commun</source> (<year>2023</year>) <volume>29</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<fpage>637</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/13527266.2022.2061033</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaushal</surname> <given-names>SK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Does source credibility matter in promoting sustainable consumption? Developing an integrated model</article-title>. <source>Soc Responsib J</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>19</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<fpage>1320</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/SRJ-07-2021-0257</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>See-To</surname> <given-names>EW</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Source credibility plays the central route: an elaboration likelihood model exploration in social media environment with demographic profile analysis</article-title>. <source>J Electron Bus Digit Econ</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>3</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/JEBDE-10-2022-0038</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mardhatilah</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Omar</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Septiari</surname> <given-names>ED</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A literature review on persuasive communication: utilising elaboration likelihood model to understand consumer engagement on social media platforms</article-title>. <source>J Technol Manag Bus</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>10</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>100</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30880/jtmb.2023.10.02.008</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>El Hedhli</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zourrig</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Dual routes or a one-way to persuasion? The elaboration likelihood model versus the unimodel</article-title>. <source>J Mark Commun</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>29</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>433</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/13527266.2022.2034033</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effects of background fitting of e-commerce live streaming on consumers&#x2019; purchase intentions: a cognitive-affective perspective</article-title>. <source>Psychol Res Behav Manag</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/PRBM.S393492</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36699986</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rai</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wai</surname> <given-names>PP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koirala</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bromage</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nirmal</surname> <given-names>NP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pandiselvam</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Food product quality, environmental and personal characteristics affecting consumer perception toward food</article-title>. <source>Front Sustain Food Syst</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>1222760</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsufs.2023.1222760</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Solin</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Curry</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Perceived quality: in search of a definition</article-title>. <source>TQM J</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>35</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>778</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>95</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/TQM-09-2021-0280</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ugwu</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Okeke</surname> <given-names>TC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Celebrity endorsement and patronage intentions of political products in Nigeria: a literature review</article-title>. <source>Int J Humanities Soc Sci Bus (INJOSS)</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>2</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>188</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>217</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abeza</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>King-White</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Sport and Social media in Business and Society</source>. <publisher-loc>Abingdon</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Taylor &#x0026; Francis</publisher-name> (<year>2023</year>).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leclercq</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Denis</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoornaert</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Trust me, I am famous: legitimating attractive celebrities as credible endorsers for charitable organisations</article-title>. <source>J Mark Manag</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>40</volume>(<issue>1&#x2013;2</issue>):<fpage>102</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/0267257X.2023.2289370</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>CH</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The effects of luxury brand influencer characteristics on self-brand connection: focused on consumer perception</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>15</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<fpage>6937</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su15086937</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hung</surname> <given-names>YC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Love the star, love the team? The spillover effect of athlete sub brand to team brand advocacy in online brand communities</article-title>. <source>J Prod Brand Manag</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>32</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/JPBM-01-2022-3824</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olwoch</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sonnenberg</surname> <given-names>NC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taljaard-Swart</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The influence of social media usage on consumers&#x2019; sustainable clothing consumption practices</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Muthu</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name></person-group>, editor. <source>Consumer Awareness and Textile Sustainability</source>. <publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer Nature</publisher-name> (<year>2023</year>). p. <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>100</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Samu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chattopadhyay</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mishra</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Role of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on consumers&#x2019; perceived product quality in an emerging market</article-title>. <source>J Int Consum Mark</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>36</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/08961530.2023.2215466</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feder</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>The effect of athlete endorsements on brand equity</source> (Selected honors theses). (<year>2023</year>). p. <fpage>178</fpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Franceschi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brocard</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Follert</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gouguet</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Football players in light of economic value theory: critical review and conceptualisation</article-title>. <source>MDE Manage Decis Econ</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>45</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>896</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>920</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mde.4039</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Islam</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Homefluencers&#x2019; endorsement of millennial consumers&#x2019; purchase intention in new normal</article-title>. <source>Int Mark Rev</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>40</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>1188</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>212</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/IMR-10-2021-0308</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elliot</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alderson</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mian</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The expert eye? An inter-rater comparison of elite tennis serve kinematics and performance</article-title>. <source>J Sports Sci</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>41</volume>(<issue>19</issue>):<fpage>1779</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02640414.2023.2298102</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38155177</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chung</surname> <given-names>KS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goebert</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Sport celebrities&#x2019; COVID-19 prevention on social media: the effect of credibility, social distance, identification, and message&#x2019;s power style on health behavioral intentions</article-title>. <source>Commun Sport</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>13</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/21674795231200014</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>MJDS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cardoso</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Canavarro</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Figueiredo</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Digital influencers&#x2019; attributes and perceived characterisations and their impact on purchase intentions</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>15</volume>(<issue>17</issue>):<fpage>12750</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su151712750</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moreira</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santos</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pires</surname> <given-names>PB</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Sports celebrity endorsement impact on purchase intention</article-title>. <source>Rev Galega de Econ</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>32</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15304/rge.32.3.8710</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Haseli</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ranjbarzadeh</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hajiaghaei-Keshteli</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghoushchi</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hasani</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deveci</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Hecon: weight assessment of the product loyalty criteria considering the customer decision&#x2019;s halo effect using the convolutional neural networks</article-title>. <source>Inf Sci (Ny)</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>623</volume>:<fpage>184</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ins.2022.12.027</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Macheka</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quaye</surname> <given-names>ES</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ligaraba</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The effect of online customer reviews and celebrity endorsement on young female consumers&#x2019; purchase intentions</article-title>. <source>Young Consum</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>25</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>462</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/YC-05-2023-1749</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>G&#x00F6;nkek</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gen&#x00E7;er</surname> <given-names>RT</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Professional athletes&#x2019; visual self-presentation strategies: an investigation on Instagram</article-title>. <source>Pamukkale J Sport Sci</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>14</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>22</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54141/psbd.1260960</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>MP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jayapriya</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>BK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chander</surname> <given-names>MARN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>BR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Service quality, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty: a comprehensive literature review</article-title>. <source>J Surv Fish Sci</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>10</volume>(<issue>4S</issue>):<fpage>3457</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sutanto</surname> <given-names>EM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Widianto</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Antecedents of consumer purchase intention of fashion products</source> (Doctoral dissertation). <publisher-name>Petra Christian University</publisher-name> (<year>2023</year>).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gilal</surname> <given-names>RG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gilal</surname> <given-names>FG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gilal</surname> <given-names>NG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Beauty and the brands: the interplay of celebrity attractiveness, brand envy, and social comparison in shaping masstige brand passion in hospitality</article-title>. <source>J Brand Manag</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>31</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>251</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1057/s41262-023-00338-5</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferreira</surname> <given-names>AG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crespo</surname> <given-names>CF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mendes</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effects of athletic performance and marketable lifestyle on consumers&#x2019; engagement with sport celebrity&#x2019;s social media and their endorsements</article-title>. <source>Int J Sports Mark Spons</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>23</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/IJSMS-12-2020-0211</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baltezarevi&#x0107;</surname> <given-names>RV</given-names></name> <name><surname>Papakonstantinidis</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Sports celebrities and their impact on consumer attitudes</article-title>. <source>Ba&#x0161;tina</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>33</volume>(<issue>60</issue>):<fpage>237</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5937/bastina33-44537</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>El-Shihy</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Unveiling the psychological mechanisms behind sports celebrity social media endorsements</article-title>. <source>Cogent Bus Manag</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>11</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>2376771</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/23311975.2024.2376771</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>CY</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Au</surname> <given-names>CH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>KK</given-names></name></person-group>. <comment>The Role of Celebrities Personality Traits &#x0026; Endorsement on Consumers Online Brand Defending and Purchase Behaviour (2023)</comment>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shezi</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The influence of sports celebrities brand personality on celebrity identification and consumers intention to buy the endorsed brands</article-title>. <source>Acta Universitatis Danubius Econ</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>21</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>122</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>JSY</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>GWH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ooi</surname> <given-names>KB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dennis</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Will social media celebrities drive me crazy? Exploring the effects of celebrity endorsement on impulsive buying behavior in social commerce</article-title>. <source>Int J Consum Stud</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>48</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>e13047</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ijcs.13047</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hussain</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khaneja</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pacholi</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yousef</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kourtoubelides</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The relationship between consumer personality traits and celebrity personality traits</article-title>. <source>J Asia Bus Stud</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>18</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>1259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>84</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/JABS-08-2022-0278</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bush</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bush</surname> <given-names>VD</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Sports celebrity influence on the behavioral intentions of generation Y</article-title>. <source>J Advert Res</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>44</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>108</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0021849904040206</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nyalungwe</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kapatamoyo</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ngwira</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Silumbu</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Knowledge, Attitude and Practices on Covid-19 among Tertiary Level Students in Blantyre Urban</source>. <publisher-loc>Blantyre</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Kamuzu University of Health Sciences</publisher-name> (<year>2022</year>).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McCormick</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Impact of athletic star power on product consumption</article-title>. <source>Int J Sports Mark Spons</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>19</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>306</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/IJSMS-06-2016-0030</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Akoglu</surname> <given-names>HE</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x00D6;zbek</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The effect of brand experiences on brand loyalty through perceived quality and brand trust: a study on sports consumers</article-title>. <source>Asia Pac J Mark Logist</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>34</volume>(<issue>10</issue>):<fpage>2130</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/APJML-05-2021-0333</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Priyankara</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weerasiri</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dissanayaka</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jinadasa</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Celebrity endorsement and consumer buying intention with relation to the television advertisement for perfumes</article-title>. <source>Manag Stud</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>5</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>128</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kock</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Common method bias: a full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Latan</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noonan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and Applications</source>. <publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name> (<year>2017</year>). p. <fpage>245</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xim&#x00E9;nez</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Revuelta</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casta&#x00F1;eda</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>What are the consequences of ignoring cross-loadings in bifactor models? A simulation study assessing parameter recovery and sensitivity of goodness-of-fit indices</article-title>. <source>Front Psychol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>923877</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923877</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clara</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Celebrity endorsements and its brand love on purchase intention at e-marketplace</article-title>. <source>Jurnal Manajemen</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>27</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24912/jm.v27i1.1078</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hovland</surname> <given-names>CI</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weiss</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness</article-title>. <source>Public Opin Q</source>. (<year>1951</year>) <volume>15</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>635</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/266350</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Louvet</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The effects of brand equity on millennials&#x2019; purchase decision for sports nutrition products in Ireland</article-title>. <source>DBS Bus Rev</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22375/dbr.v5i.87</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A study of consumer buying behavior as related to the effects of endorsements by celebrities</article-title>. <source>Terminology</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>4</fpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Giri</surname> <given-names>RRW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alfaruqi</surname> <given-names>FF</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The effect of endorser credibility on purchase intention mediated by brand attitude and brand credibility on online travel agent traveloka</article-title>. <source>Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>23</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25124/jmi.v23i2.4295</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stvilia</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>HS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Developing a platform-specific framework for web credibility assessment: a case of social Q&#x0026;A sites</article-title>. <source>Inf Process Manag</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>60</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>103321</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103321</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B74"><label>74.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Repke</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Batastini</surname> <given-names>AB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sacco</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dahlen</surname> <given-names>ER</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohn</surname> <given-names>RS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The power of presentation: how attire, cosmetics, and posture impact the source credibility of women expert witnesses</article-title>. <source>J Forensic Sci</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>68</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>962</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1556-4029.15253</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37016533</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B75"><label>75.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mishra</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bailey</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Celebrity co-creator or celebrity endorser? Exploring mediating and moderating factors in Marcom decision</article-title>. <source>Psychol Mark</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>41</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>802</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mar.21952</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B76"><label>76.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Virtual idols vs online influencers vs traditional celebrities: how young consumers respond to their endorsement advertising</article-title>. <source>Young Consum</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>25</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>329</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/YC-08-2023-1811</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B77"><label>77.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jain</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bamba</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jain</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Analysing influence of attractiveness and credibility of the celebrity upon ad recall and purchase intention of the consumer</article-title>. <source>J Namibian Stud</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>33</volume>:<fpage>5093</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>111</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B78"><label>78.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nisbett</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>TD</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The halo effect: evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments</article-title>. <source>J Pers Soc Psychol</source>. (<year>1977</year>) <volume>35</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>250</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B79"><label>79.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Flavi&#x00E1;n</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akdim</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casal&#x00F3;</surname> <given-names>LV</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effects of voice assistant recommendations on consumer behavior</article-title>. <source>Psychol Mark</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>40</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>328</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mar.21765</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B80"><label>80.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Sustaining customer loyalty of fresh food e-tailers: an empirical study in China</article-title>. <source>Asia Pac J Mark Logist</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>35</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>669</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/APJML-01-2022-0013</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B81"><label>81.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>DG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Value co-creation through branded apps: enhancing perceived quality and brand loyalty</article-title>. <source>J Res Interact Mark</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>17</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>562</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/JRIM-04-2022-0128</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B82"><label>82.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Filieri</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Acikgoz</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alguezaui</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Influencers&#x2019; &#x201C;organic&#x201D; persuasion through electronic word of mouth: a case of sincerity over brains and beauty</article-title>. <source>Psychol Mark</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>40</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>347</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mar.21760</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B83"><label>83.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ling</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Masrom</surname> <given-names>MB</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Role of live e-commerce on consumer purchase intentions</article-title>. <source>Int J Prof Bus Rev</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>8</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>e02435</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i6.2435</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B84"><label>84.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shoukat</surname> <given-names>MH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Selem</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asim Shah</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>How does social media influencer credibility blow the promotional horn? A dual mediation model</article-title>. <source>J Relationsh Mark</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>22</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>172</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>201</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15332667.2023.2197767</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B85"><label>85.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dhun</surname></name> <name><surname>Dangi</surname><given-names>HK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Influencer marketing: role of influencer credibility and congruence on brand attitude and eWOM</article-title>. <source>J Int Commer</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>22</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>S28</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>S72</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15332861.2022.2125220</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B86"><label>86.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ono</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ono</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Do celebrities in advertisements matter? Familiar endorsers as an accelerator of gestural cues of persuasion</article-title>. <source>Int J Advert</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>43</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>904</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02650487.2024.2332107</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B87"><label>87.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>CK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jung</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Exploring consumer behavior in virtual reality tourism using an extended stimulus-organism-response model</article-title>. <source>J Travel Res</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>59</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>89</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0047287518818915</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B88"><label>88.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Creswell</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Plano Clark</surname> <given-names>VL</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research</source>. <edition>3rd ed</edition>. <publisher-loc>Thousand Oaks, CA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>SAGE Publications</publisher-name> (<year>2017</year>).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B89"><label>89.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Braun</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clarke</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Using thematic analysis in psychology</article-title>. <source>Qual Res Psychol</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>3</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1191/1478088706qp063oa</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B90"><label>90.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hair</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hult</surname> <given-names>GTM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ringle</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sarstedt</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)</source>. <edition>3rd ed</edition>. <publisher-loc>Thousand Oaks, CA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>SAGE Publications</publisher-name> (<year>2022</year>).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B91"><label>91.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petty</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cacioppo</surname> <given-names>JT</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change</source>. <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer-Verlag</publisher-name> (<year>1986</year>).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list>
<app-group><app id="app1"><title>Appendix A1 Constructs and adopted measurement scales</title>
<table-wrap id="T8" position="float"><label>Table&#x00A0;A1</label>
<caption><p>Summary of constructs and adopted measurement scales.</p></caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="left"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Construct</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Item</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Source</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Adaptation Notes</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Personality Traits&#x2014;Likability</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">I find the sports celebrity likable.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="12">McCormick (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">63</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wording modified to refer to social media posts on Instagram, Snapchat, or Twitter.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">The sports celebrity appears friendly and approachable on social media.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Adapted to fit the social media endorsement context.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I enjoy the content shared by the sports celebrity on their social media accounts.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wording aligned with Instagram, Snapchat, or Twitter content consumption.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Personality Traits&#x2014;Expertise</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">The sports celebrity is knowledgeable about the endorsed product.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Adapted to emphasize online product knowledge.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">The sports celebrity provides useful information about the product in their social media posts.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Contextualized for social media endorsements.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">The sports celebrity seems competent in endorsing this type of product.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Slight rewording to reflect endorsement relevance.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Personality Traits&#x2014;Credibility</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">The sports celebrity provides trustworthy information.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Context changed to Instagram, Snapchat, or Twitter.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I can rely on the sports celebrity&#x0027;s social media recommendations.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Modified to reflect online consumer decision-making.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">The sports celebrity appears honest in their product endorsements online.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wording adapted for digital endorsements.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Personality Traits&#x2014;Physical Attractiveness</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">The sports celebrity is physically attractive.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No major changes.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">The sports celebrity&#x0027;s appearance captures my attention on social media.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Adapted to visual attention on Instagram, Snapchat, or Twitter feeds.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I find the sports celebrity aesthetically appealing.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No major changes.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Perceived Product Quality</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">The product endorsed by the sports celebrity meets high-quality standards.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Akoglu &#x0026; &#x00D6;zbek (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">64</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Adapted to reflect social media exposure.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I believe the product performs as promised.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Minor wording adjustments.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">The product seems reliable based on the endorsement.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Aligned with online endorsement assessment.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Purchase Intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">I am likely to buy the product after seeing the sports celebrity endorse it on social media.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Priyankara et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">65</xref>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Contextualized for social media endorsements.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I would consider purchasing this product based on the sports celebrity&#x0027;s online endorsement.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Adapted to match online decision-making.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I would recommend this product to others based on the social media endorsement.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Added &#x201C;based on social media endorsement.&#x201D;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TF11"><p>1. All items were adapted to the social media context (Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter) to accurately capture respondents&#x0027; perceptions of sports celebrity traits and endorsements across platforms.</p></fn>
<fn id="TF12"><p>2. Purchase intention items reflect both likelihood of purchase and willingness to recommend, consistent with the behavioral patterns identified in the mixed-methods findings.</p></fn>
<fn id="TF13"><p>3. All items were measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;Strongly Disagree to 5&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;Strongly Agree).</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap></app>
<app id="app2"><title>Appendix A2 Semi-structured interview guide</title>
<table-wrap id="T9" position="float"><label>Table&#x00A0;A2</label>
<caption><p>Interview guide with main questions and probes.</p></caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="left"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Section</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Main Questions</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Probes</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">1. General Engagement and Perception</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>How often do you follow sports celebrities on your primary platform?</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>What types of posts capture your attention most (e.g., videos, images, stories, written posts)?</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Influence of behind-the-scenes content on perceptions of the celebrity.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">2. Likability</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>What makes a sports celebrity likable to you on your primary platform?</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Can you describe posts or behaviors that strengthened your emotional connection?</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Personal stories, casual moments, interactions with fans.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">3. Expertise</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>How do you recognize a sports celebrity as knowledgeable or expert about products on your primary platform?</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Can you recall a situation where their expertise affected your perception?</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Detailed explanations, performance insights, product reviews.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">4. Credibility/Trust</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>What factors make you trust or doubt a sports celebrity&#x0027;s endorsement?</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Can you give examples of when the celebrity felt authentic versus insincere?</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Consistency, long-term partnerships, transparency, platform-specific content.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">5. Physical Attractiveness</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>To what extent does a celebrity&#x0027;s physical appearance influence your perception of endorsed products?</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Can you share an example where attractiveness combined with performance influenced your purchase intention?</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Discipline, fitness, lifestyle relevance, platform context.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">6. Platform-Specific Experience</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>How does your primary platform shape your perception of celebrity traits?</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Are there differences in how you respond to the same celebrity across Instagram, Twitter, or Snapchat?</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Visual features, storytelling style, engagement mechanisms (comments, polls, stories).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">7. Purchase Intention</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Have you ever purchased a product because of a celebrity endorsement? If yes, describe the experience.</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>How do likability, expertise, credibility, and physical attractiveness influence your purchase decisions?</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">8. Closing</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Is there anything else about following sports celebrities that influences your opinions or purchase decisions?</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Any final comments on how platform or content type affects your perceptions?</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap></app>
<app id="app3"><title>Appendix A3 Examples of coding, categories, and themes from interviews</title>
<table-wrap id="T10" position="float"><label>Table&#x00A0;A3</label>
<caption><p>Examples of how raw participant statements were coded, grouped into categories, and synthesized into overarching themes.</p></caption>
<table>
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="left"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Raw Statement</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Initial Code</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Category/Axial Code</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Theme</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x201C;I follow a few athletes who post behind-the-scenes stuff&#x2014;family dinners, workouts, even silly moments. That&#x0027;s when I start to feel like I know them. It&#x0027;s not just a brand talking&#x2014;it&#x0027;s them.&#x201D;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Behind-the-scenes content</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Emotional connection</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Authentic Engagement Enhances Likability</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x201C;If I like the person, I&#x0027;m more open to what they&#x0027;re promoting&#x2014;even if I hadn&#x0027;t considered that product before.&#x201D;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Liking influences openness</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x201C;Even short stories or candid clips make me feel like I understand their personality. That makes me trust their recommendations more.&#x201D;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Casual, relatable content</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x201C;When a footballer breaks down how their boots help them pivot better or gives technical feedback on a supplement&#x2014;it sticks. That&#x0027;s what I want to hear.&#x201D;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Product knowledge demonstration</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Expertise display</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Expertise Must Be Contextual and Demonstrated</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x201C;Twitter is where I go for insights. I don&#x0027;t care if they look good&#x2014;I care if they know what they&#x0027;re talking about.&#x201D;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Platform-specific expertise</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x201C;I trust celebrities who show me exactly how they use a product. Their knowledge matters more than appearance.&#x201D;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Demonstrated usage</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x201C;If I see someone pushing different brands every week, I stop trusting them. But when it&#x0027;s someone who&#x0027;s been with the same brand for a while&#x2014;and shows how they use it&#x2014;I take it seriously.&#x201D;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Consistency in endorsement</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Trust &#x0026; credibility</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Trust and Credibility Are Built Through Consistency</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x201C;Snapchat feels more real. You catch them off guard sometimes. That&#x0027;s where I judge if they actually believe in the product.&#x201D;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Candid content fosters trust</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x201C;I look at how consistent their endorsements are. If it matches their values and performance, I trust them more.&#x201D;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Value alignment</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x201C;Yeah, looks catch attention&#x2014;but if that person clearly trains hard and maintains discipline, I respect that. It tells me their product might reflect that same quality.&#x201D;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Attractiveness&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;performance</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Contextual relevance</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" rowspan="3">Physical Attractiveness Is Context-Dependent and Aspirational</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x201C;Attractiveness matters, but only when it connects with their performance. I&#x0027;d buy protein powder from someone who looks like they use it&#x2014;not just someone with a filter.&#x201D;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Visual appeal&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;relevance</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x201C;On Instagram, attractiveness draws me in, but performance and authenticity keep me engaged.&#x201D;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Looks&#x2009;&#x002B;&#x2009;authenticity</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap></app>
</app-group>
<fn-group>
<fn id="n1" fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/584239/overview">Luis Ma&#x00F1;as-Viniegra</ext-link>, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain</p></fn>
<fn id="n2" fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by"><p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2224503/overview">Monika Pi&#x0105;tkowska</ext-link>, J&#x00F3;zef Pi&#x0142;sudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Poland</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3144520/overview">Purwanto Pur</ext-link>, STIE Mahardhika, Indonesia</p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>