The top 30 cm layer of the soil was sampled right after the spring barley harvest. Each plot was sampled seven times. The samples were pooled to produce a representative sample from the plot. This way, four representative samples from each treatment were produced. The soil samples were later dried in a force-air drier at 40°C until the constant weight. Once dry, samples were sieved for <2 mm particles for all analyses. A portion of the sample was also sieved for <0.4 mm particles for the CNS elemental analyser.

The Soil organic carbon (C_SOM) content was assessed through oxidation using the CNS Analyzer Elementar Vario Macro (Elementar Analysensysteme, Hanau near—Frankfurt am Main, Germany).

The fractionation of carbon in humic substances (C_HS) was carried out following the method described by Kononova (58) to obtain the pyrophosphate-extractable fraction, which represents the sum of carbon in humic acids (C_HA) and fulvic acids (C_FA). Below is a summary of the procedure: A 5 g soil sample was extracted using a mixed solution of 0.10 mol L⁻¹ NaOH and 0.10 mol L⁻¹ Na₄P₂O₇ (1:20 w/v). This extraction process isolated the C_HA and C_FA fractions. The C_FA was obtained by acidifying the solution with dilute H₂SO₄ to a pH of 1.0–1.5, and the solution was left undisturbed for 24 hours. C_HA was recovered by dissolving the precipitate formed during acidification in hot 0.05 mol L⁻¹ NaOH. Before iodometric titration, the dry matter from each sample, obtained through vaporisation, was dissolved in a mixture of 0.067 mol L⁻¹ K₂Cr₂O₇ and concentrated H₂SO₄ under elevated temperature conditions. Humification indices were calculated according to Raiesi (59) and Iqbal et al. (60):

where C_FA is the fulvic acid carbon, C_HA is the humic acid carbon, and C_SOM is the total organic carbon in soil.

The easily extractable glomalin (EEG) and total glomalin (TG) were analysed according to the method of Wright and Upadhyaya (10). In summary, 1.00 g of air-dried soil (<2 mm) was mixed with 8 mL of sodium citrate (20 mmol L⁻¹ at pH 7.0 for EEG and 50 mmol L⁻¹ at pH 8.0 for TG). The mixture was autoclaved at 121°C for 30 minutes for EEG and 60 minutes for TG, then cooled and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 minutes for EEG and 15 minutes for TG. For TG, the supernatant was centrifuged five times until the characteristic red-brown colour, typical of glomalin, was no longer observed. Both forms of glomalin were quantified colourimetrically using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard and the Bradford protein assay (both from Bio-Rad, CA, Hercules, USA) to detect the colour change. The glomalin content in the extracts was determined using the Tecan Infinite M Plex multimode microplate reader (Männedorf, Switzerland) at 595 nm.

The potential wettability index (PWI) and index of aromaticity (iAR) were determined using DRIFT (diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy) spectra. The DRIFT spectra were captured with an infrared spectrometer (Nicolet IS10, Waltham, MA, USA), covering a range from 2.50 to 25.0 μm (4000 to 400 cm⁻¹). Alkyl C–H group bands (2948–2920 cm⁻¹ and 2864–2849 cm⁻¹) were considered indicative of hydrophobicity, while C=O group bands (1710 cm⁻¹ and 1640–1600 cm⁻¹) indicated hydrophilicity. The ratio of hydrophobicity to hydrophilicity determined the potential wettability index (61).

The aromaticity index was calculated based on the reflectance values of aliphatic bands ranging from 3000 to 2800 cm⁻¹ (AL) and the aromatic band at 1520 cm⁻¹ (AR) (61).

Water aggregate stability (WSA) was evaluated using the WSA index, following the procedure described by Nimmo and Perkins (62). Four grams of air-dried soil aggregates (with a diameter of 2–5 mm) were sieved for 3 minutes in distilled water (using a 0.25-mm sieve) with a frequency of 35 cycles per minute and a vertical amplitude of 1.3 cm. The aggregates that remained on the sieve were then sieved (using the same frequency and amplitude) in a sodium hexametaphosphate solution (2 g L⁻¹) until only sand particles remained on the sieve. The aggregates that dissolved during wetting in water or hexametaphosphate solution were subsequently dried at 105°C and weighed. The WSA index was calculated as follows:

where Wds is the weight of aggregates dispersed in a sodium hexametaphosphate solution, and Wdw is the weight of aggregates dispersed in distilled water. An increase in the WSA value indicates an increase in soil aggregate stability

The carbon sequestration efficiency (CSE) was calculated as follows:

C_SOMtreatment represents the quantity of carbon present in the soil under the fertilised treatment. C_SOMunfert signifies the amount of C in the soil under the unfertilised Con treatment. TCI denotes the total carbon input (t ha⁻¹) applied through organic fertilisers throughout the course of individual experiments Wang et al. (63).

First, the principal components analysis (PCA) was performed in order to identify the most important variables. The results were also assessed using a one-way ANOVA to determine the influence of treatments and site on the SOM content and quality indicators. Tukey’s test (p<0.05) was used for post hoc comparisons. Linear regression was used to outline the relationship among selected variables (p<0.05). All statistical evaluations were performed using Statistica software, version 12.3 (TIBCO, Palo Alto, CA, USA).

The aim of this work was not to monitor yields in individual treatments. The focus was on changes in the content and quality of soil organic matter (SOM). The included yields of winter wheat grain are provided only to illustrate the situation in our experiments. These yields roughly represent the influence of treatments on the yields ( Figure 1 ). The average yield of wheat grain (site A) in the control treatment was 4.82 t DM ha^-1. In comparison, site B produced 3.35 t DM ha^-1 in the control treatment. The experiment is based on the application of 330 kg N ha^-1 every three years to all treatments, except the unfertilised control, SS3 (990 kg N ha^-1), and mineral nitrogen + straw (N+St) treatment. The N+St treatment received a higher dose of nitrogen due to the straw incorporation into potatoes (site A) or maize (site B) ( Table 2 ). The Figure 1 shows that the differences among the fertilised treatments were non-significant.

The dynamics of yields throughout the experiment are shown in Figures 2 and 3. For simplicity, the yields were calculated as three-year averages per treatment. The control treatment consistently provided the lowest yields. There was an increasing trend in differences between the control and fertilised treatments over the course of the experiment ( Figures 2 , 3 ). The control treatment yields stayed roughly the same throughout the experiment on both sites. The yields of fertiliser treatments had an increasing trend (y=0.3463x+5.7098) from the initial values between 5-7 t ha^-1 year^-1 on site A ( Figure 2 ). The yields of fertiliser treatments on site B also had an increasing trend (y=0.1209x+4.7936) from 5-6 t ha^-1 ( Figure 3 ). The influence of periods was also notable. Both sites indicated increasing yields (linear average). The increasing yield over the course of the experiment is likely due to the change in wheat variety. The new varieties provide a higher yield potential.

The carbon sequestration efficiency (CSE) was based on the average bulk density of both sites (the difference among sites is minimal) and the average amount of supplied carbon by farmyard manure (the difference among sites is minimal also). The CSE values are presented in Table 5 . The values of CSE decrease with the increase in the amount of carbon (C) supplied. The high dose of sewage sludge (SS3) treatment resulted in a lower CSE value (38.6%) than the normal dose of sewage sludge (SS1) treatment (45.6%). A similar trend was also observed among the farmyard manure (F1) (35.0%) and half a dose of farmyard manure and half a dose of mineral fertiliser (F1/2+N1/2) treatments (41.4%). The lowest value was determined for the N+St treatment (34.1%) although the amount of supplied carbon was lowest on this treatment (19.26 t C ha^-1 over 27 years).

The indicators of SOM content and quality for individual sites represent the average of all the treatments ( Table 6 ). The presented values represent the average of all treatments. The content of C_SOM was lower on site A (1.07%) in comparison with site B (1.41%); however, the degree of polymerisation (HA) and glomalin content suggest better SOM quality on site A.

The influence of individual treatments over the SOM content and quality indicators is displayed in Table 5 . The results of both sites were averaged. A statistically significant increase in the SOM content happened only in the SS3 treatment that received 63.33 t C ha^-1 during the 27 years of the experiment. The C_SOM content, especially on the SS1 and F1 treatments increased. The C_SOM content on the SS1 and F1 treatments is 1.24 and 1.33%, respectively. This is in accord with the supplied amount of carbon (21.11 and 38.3 t C ha^-1 during 27 years into the SS1 and F1 treatments, respectively).The unfertilised treatment was observed with the lowest C_SOM content (1.03%) and quality (C_HA, HA). The low C_SOM content is related to the lowest aboveground biomass yields as well as small root biomass. The F1 treatment produced a lower long-term yield ( Figures 1 - 3 ) in comparison to other fertiliser treatments (the difference is non-significant). However, it was one of the best treatments considering the content and quality of SOM. There was a clear trend in the increase in C_SOM. Other than that, the C_SOM/N_T ratio was also increased, indicating an increased SOM quality. The C_HA content and degree of polymerisation (HA) also increased significantly, further indicating an increase in the SOM quality. The fraction of stabilised and polymerized fraction of SOM becomes increased. This is expressed by an increase in: a) humification rate (HR); b) humification index (HI) (59, 60).

There was a gradual increase in C_SOM content in the mineral nitrogen (N) treatment in comparison with the control ( Table 5 ). The SOM quality of the N treatment was described by several negative results. Specifically, the C_HA content and the TG content were comparable to the control. The mineral nitrogen-only fertilisation causes faster mineralisation of stable SOM due to the priming effect, which in turn, reduces the C_HA content and leads to the lowest humification index value.

There was an increase in the C_SOM content on the N+St ( Table 5 ) treatment compared to the control and N treatments. Despite lower carbon inputs in the soil, the CSE value (34.1%) is relatively high in comparison with the F1 treatment. The carbon input in the N+St treatment was almost the same as in the F1/2+N1/2 treatment, yet the CSE value for N+St treatment was lower. This points out the smaller stability of organic matter in straw in comparison with manure. In comparison with the SS1 treatment, the N+St produced a lower CSE value, than SS1 (45.6%). This could be a result of higher C_SOM content on the SS1 treatment. With regard to the SOM quality indicators (C_HA, HA, PWI, iAR, and EEG/TG), the SS1 and N+St treatments are almost identical.

The SS3 treatment was originally designed as a potential treatment for achieving a significant change in SOM content and quality. High carbon inputs (63.33 t ha^-1 over 27 years) resulted in an increased C_SOM content. The substantially lower C/N ratio in sludge (7/1) and higher dose of N (990 kg N ha^-1 every three years) caused significantly lower carbon in soil organic matter/total nitrogen (C_SOM/N_T) ratio in the soil (9.29/1). The higher dose of carbon in the sludge caused an increase in C_HA content but with an overall lower quality of C_SOM in comparison with the manure. The humification index on this treatment is significantly reduced.

No significant effect of fertiliser treatment on the EEG content was determined (p<0.05). The EEG content ranged between 482 and 530 mg (mg kg^-1) based on the treatment ( Table 5 ). A significant influence of treatment (p<0.05) was determined on the total glomalin (TG) content. The lowest TG content was on the Cont treatment (1443 mg kg^-1). The EEG/carbon in soil organic matter (EEG/C_SOM) ratio was between 3.32 and 4.68% (SS3 and Cont, respectively). The TG/C_SOM ratio was between 12.0 and 16.2% (SS3 and F1/2+N1/2, respectively). This means, that there is more pronounced increase in the C_SOM content on the SS3 treatment, that is not followed by appropriate increase in its quality (glomalin content).

The EEG/TG ratio was another selected SOM quality indicator. The highest value was monitored on the Cont treatment (33.4%), where the lowest degree of polymerisation (HA) was detected. The lowest value was present on the SS1 treatment (26.3%), where the HA value was the lowest. The EEG/TG value was mostly influenced by the changes in the TG content, as the EEG content was not significantly influenced by the fertiliser treatment.

Mutual connection among the SOM content and quality indicators and methods for their estimation are presented in Table 7 . The EEG content is lightly, negatively related to the C_SOM content (R² = 0.207, p<0.001), C_FA (R² = 0.327, p<0.001) and C_SOM/N_T (R² = 0.172; p<0.01) (n=56). The EEG content was positively related to the degree of polymerisation (R² = 0.403, n=56, p<0.001). However, the TG content is positively related only to the content of C_HA (R² = 0.298), and degree of polymerisation (R² = 0.327, n=56, p<0.001). The EEG/TG ratio was significantly negatively related to the C_SOM content (R² = 0.218), C_HS (R² = 0.263), and C_SOM/N_T (R² = 0.187) (n=56, p<0.001). It is important to note, that some of these relationships have rather wide confidence intervals (marked in Table 7 ), which suggests, that at our number of observations (n=56), these trends might be real, but with lower certainty of the exact value of regression coefficient.

The effect of the fertiliser treatment on the potential wettability index (PWI) is displayed in Table 5 . The unfertilised Cont treatment (0.010) is comparable with F1/2+N1/2, N, and N+St treatments (0.014, 0.012, and 0.014, respectively), although these treatments produced a slight increase in PWI values. A significant increase (p<0.05) in PWI values was determined for SS1, SS3, and F1 treatments in (0.016, 0.019, and 0.016, respectively) comparison with unfertilised Cont treatment. These treatments were also comparable to each other (p<0.05). Confidence intervals (95%) for individual treatments also suggest relatively small data variability.

The relation of PWI to other SOM content and quality indicators was further evaluated by regression analysis ( Table 7 ). Significant relationships between PWI and C_SOM (R² = 0.798), C_HS (R² = 0.550), C_HA (R² = 0.249), C_FA (R² = 0.492), and EEG/TG (R² = 0.243, negative relationship) were determined (p<0.001; n=56). The number of observations, tightness of confidence intervals (95%) and low significance level suggest, that the observed trends are significant and representative of reality.

The influence of fertiliser on the water-stability of aggregates (WSA) is documented in Table 5 . The unfertilised Cont treatment (0.417) was statistically comparable to all treatments (between 0.391 and 0.456) except the F1 (0.516). The WSA value was not significantly related to any other SOM content and quality indicator (p<0.05, n=56). Suppose we add a relatively high scatter in the data (as documented by confidence intervals in Tables 5 and 7 ). In that case, it suggests that the water-stability of soil aggregates requires the investigation of more factors, than just the SOM content and quality. It might also be due to the fact, that data from two sites were pooled together.

The experiment was comprised of a simple crop rotation, potatoes or maize, followed by winter wheat and spring barley. The lower content of C_SOM, and overall low quality of soil organic matter (SOM) was observed in the control treatment. This statement is based on the lowest degree of polymerisation (HA) value, very low glomalin content, water-stability of aggregates (WSA) value and significant decrease in potential wettability index (PWI), and index of aromaticity (iAR) values compared to fertiliser treatments.

After the farmyard manure application, an increase in carbon in soil organic matter (C_SOM) content was observed along with an increase in SOM quality indicators, which underscores the importance of the manure application. A high carbon in humic acids (C_HA) content, HA, PWI, iAR and significantly increased total glomalin (TG) content were observed. Additionally, the highest stability of soil aggregates was present here. This is following our previous study in the maize monoculture on luvisol, where we also observed a significant increase in the C_SOM content and HA after farmyard manure application (36). Menšík et al. (64) and Liang et al. (65) also state a positive effect of farmyard manure application on the C_SOM content and SOM quality (C_HA content). The positive effect of farmyard manure application is also noted in Voltr et al. (66), Naikwade (67), and Macholdt et al. (68).

A build-up of SOM using the mineral-only N fertiliser can be achieved when applied at or below the level at which maximum yields are obtained, by promoting plant growth and increasing the amount of litter and root biomass added to the soil (23). On the other hand, such fertiliser can also cause a decrease in SOM. If applied in a dose greater than that needed for maximum crop yields, additional N inputs can increase the microbial biomass (69) and enzyme activity resulting in faster SOM mineralisation (23, 70). Mineral only nitrogen (N) fertiliser did not produce a significant change in C_SOM content in our study, although an increasing trend is visible ( Table 5 ) suggesting the optimum nitrogen dose was used. What is noticeable in our study is a destructive effect on the SOM quality in comparison with the organic fertiliser treatments. The C_HA, HA as well as TG, PWI, and iAR content were decreased. The negative influence of mineral-only N fertilisation on the SOM quality was also observed in our previous works (32, 36, 37). There were almost no differences in the sewage sludge (SS1) and mineral nitrogen + straw (N+St) treatments on the SOM content and quality. The extreme dose of sewage sludge in the SS3 treatment had a significant effect on the C_SOM, C_HA, as well as carbon in fulvic acids (C_FA) content. This resulted in a very small change in the HA. The high N dose in this treatment lowers the stability of soil aggregates. The positive effect of normal sewage sludge application dose (similar to the SS1 treatment currently presented) was also observed in our previous studies on luvisol and chernozem (36, 37).

We have not established a significant effect of different fertiliser treatments on the easily extractable glomalin (EEG) content in our long-term experiments. Nevertheless, a tight correlation with C_SOM was established elsewhere (71). Our previous conclusions related to the tighter correlation of total glomalin (TG) and C_SOM were not confirmed (72). A tight relationship of EEG and C_FA content was established, yet no correlation with C_HA was present. It is likely, that EEG and fulvic acids represent less stable fractions of SOM. The relationship between TG and C_SOM was not significant, although a positive correlation between glomalin content and C_SOM was reported by different authors (10, 73). This is likely due to the different quality of applied fertilisers. After the fertiliser application, the C_SOM content is increased. However, due to the different quality of fertilisers, their influence on the SOM quality indicators also differs. The increased TG content is usually related to increased SOM quality (e.g. C_HA). The highest TG content was measured on the farmyard manure (F1) treatment, which aligns with the findings of other studies (25, 26, 28, 74, 75). This supports the ability of manure to form stable organic matter, which is in line with recent findings of Yang et al. (76), that monitored a relative increase of C and N in the glomalin extract after organic fertiliser application. Furthermore, the C_HA content was also highest in this treatment and, there was a significant relationship between TG content and C_HA content ( Table 7 ). On the other hand, there was no significant relationship between TG content and C_FA content.

An increase in glomalin content following manure application was also observed in our previous studies on luvisol (72) and cambisol (38). Similarly, Bertagnoli et al. (31) and Zhang et al. (30) reported an increase in TG content after the application of farmyard manure. In line with the findings of Černý et al. (21) and Balík et al. (36), a strong correlation between TG content and the HA ratio was established in the present study. These results are in accord to those of Nichols and Wright (22), who determined a tight correlation between glomalin content and humic acids content.

Our initial hypothesis about the use of easily extractable/total glomalin content (EEG/TG) ratio as an indicator of SOM quality is based on our previous research focused on monitoring the soils across Czech Republic (21). A lower EEG/TG ratio was present on soils with higher SOM quality. In the current work, the EEG/TG ratio is significantly influenced by fertiliser treatments ( Table 5 ). The lowest value (26.3%) was established for the F1 treatment, on the other hand, the highest ratio (33.4%) was established for the control treatment. We drew similar conclusions in our different study on five different luvisol sites (72). The highest significant value (32.6%) was, likewise, present in the unfertilised control treatment. Based on our previous work, it is clear, that the ratio is sharply determined by the soil type and soil texture (21). The lowest ratio was recorded in chernozems (14.7%), while the highest was found in luvisols (27.3%). The EEG/TG ratio is in a negative significant relationship with the C_SOM content in the current study. Based on our current results, there was no influence of fertiliser treatment on the EEG content. The lowest EEG content was present in the control treatment. Therefore, the EEG/TG ratio was mostly determined by the TG content. It is possible to state, that along with the increasing quality of SOM (HA), a decreasing EEG/TG ratio was determined in the F1 treatment. Given the results, the use of the EEG/TG ratio is a fitting criterion while using the data about glomalin content (EEG and TG).

The quality of SOM is determined by the potential wettability index (PWI), which represents the ratio between aliphatic (C-H) and carboxylic (C=O) bonds. Higher PWI values indicate decreased aggregate wettability (77). The lowest PWI values were observed in the control treatment. Consistent with our previous results, we found a significant influence of fertiliser treatments on the PWI value (36). Demyan et al. (35) observed an increase in the PWI after farmyard manure application. Organic fertiliser application increased the hydrophobic particle content and contributed to the forming of larger soil aggregates under these treatments. Secondary metabolites created during the decomposition of organic matter can be hydrophobic in character (78). The negative influence of mineral N fertiliser on the PWI was observed. A decrease in the aromaticity of soil particles was observed by Liu et al. (79) and Hu et al. (80). An increase in aliphatic alkyl C content likely causes it. This would also explain a decrease in the PWI since aliphatic bands used for the calculation of PWI overlap. These results are in accord with our previous study on maize monoculture on chernozem (37). In the current study, we observed a strong relationship between PWI and C_SOM, as well as other indicators of SOM quality like carbon in humic substances (C_HS), C_HA, and C_FA in the current study. The strong correlation of PWI and C_SOM is also mentioned elsewhere (36, 81). The aromaticity index (iAR) calculated based on the reflectance of aliphatic and aromatic bands (82) confirmed the same conclusions as the PWI, with the application of farmyard manure and sewage sludge also increasing the iAR.

A positive correlation between glomalin fractions (EEG and TG) and aromatic and hydrophobic components of SOM was established by Stehlíková et al. (50). On the other hand, the authors did not find an increase in the hydrophobicity index after an increase in the glycoprotein content, which resembles the relation to the potential wettability index (PWI), as mentioned in Balík et al. (36, 37). In the work of Stehlíková et al. (50), a negative correlation of the hydrophobicity index with EEG and TG was established.

There was no relationship between the water stability of soil aggregates (WSA) and SOM content and quality. This is likely due to the different quality and content of applied organic fertilisers (manure, sewage sludge, straw). While a general increase in C_SOM content was observed, changes in its quality were inconsistent. We established the highest stability of soil aggregates in the farmyard manure (F1) treatment, which aligns with the findings of other studies (47, 48, 69, 83, 84). The F1 treatment also had the highest TG content. Long-term fertiliser applications influence, directly or indirectly, the accumulation of glomalin through the regulation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) diversity, or increased production of their biomass (85). The farmyard manure application increases the glomalin content through the following pathways: 1) improvement in soil pH (86) and available nutrient content (87) thereby reducing the competition between the AMF and plant (88). 2) decrease in bulk density and increase in porosity of soil (89), which provides AMF a sufficient supply of oxygen and water (90). An increase in porosity also makes it easier for AMF hyphae to spread (91) and support the overall development of AMF (92). 3) The AMF biomass content correlates with glomalin content in the entire soil volume as well as in macroaggregates (93). Soil aggregates (> 250 μm) provide appropriate sites for microorganisms and therefore the farmyard manure can support the growth and metabolism of multiple AMF species, which is stated in recent studies (94, 95). In accord with this, the highest TG content as well as the highest aggregate stability (WSA) was determined in the F1 treatment. Similarly, Nthebere et al. (17) determined positive correlation between stability of aggregates (1-2 mm) and TG content.

In contrast, Stehlíková et al. (50) found no effect of manure application on the stability of soil aggregates when compared to the unfertilised treatment on phaeozem and even observed a negative effect on chernozem. However, they did report a positive effect of manure application on the stability of soil aggregates on cambisol.

Although C_SOM content was increased in the SS3 treatment due to the extremely high dose of the applied sludge, the SOM quality (HA, EEG/C_SOM, and TG/C_SOM) did not increase proportionally. The extremely high inputs of N (including NH₄ ⁺) negatively impacted the stability of soil aggregates (48). Our previous conclusion regarding the application of sewage sludge in a long-term maize monoculture experiment on chernozem could not be confirmed, as the sewage sludge application in that study increased the stability of soil aggregates (38).

We did not establish any relationship between the water stability of aggregates (WSA) with glomalin content (EEG and TG) and PWI. The conclusion of Zhang et al. (96) and Nthebere et al. (17) could not be confirmed, as they mentioned that glomalin is an important factor in soil stability of soil aggregates. The effect of glomalin on stability of soil aggregates was also mentioned by Gispert et al. (24). High water stability of soil aggregates (WSA) is most likely caused by the application of SOM hydrophobic components. This is connected to the lower wettability of aggregates (higher hydrophobicity index values). In turn, this means greater protection for the soil aggregates (34). According to Thai et al. (43), the soil aggregates contain more hydrophobic groups, that stabilize the soil structure.

Similarly to our current study, Stehlíková et al. (50) did not find a correlation between the stability of soil aggregates and EEG or TG, as previously noted by Řezáčová et al. (71) and Wright and Anderson (97). The lack of relationship between glomalin content and WSA in this study can be summarized as: a) Applied organic fertilisers and mineral N fertilisers had varying effects on the SOM content and quality including the glomalin content. b) The effects of treatments were in many cases opposed regarding individual indicators (namely, the SS3 treatment). c) Glomalin content is only one of many factors influencing the soil aggregate stability. d) Two sites are evaluated, which increases the variability in the data. Moreover, further studies should be carried out to verify the use of glomalin as an indicator of aggregate stability in soils. Our achieved results further enhance the conclusions that mention the stability of soil aggregates is not only connected to the SOM content but also its quality and other factors, such as pH, clay particle content and quality, or the presence of Fe, Mn, Al (39, 40, 42).

In the Czech Republic, luvisols belong to some of the most fertile soils. The problem is their relative susceptibility to a decrease in the SOM content and quality (98). The selected sites represent a considerable area of the Czech Republic in relation to their average temperature and precipitation. The selected crops (potatoes/maize, winter wheat, and spring barley) represent 50.2% of arable soil of the Czech Republic. Therefore, the achieved results regarding the changes in the SOM content and quality can be applied to the entire area of the Czech Republic luvisols. A positive effect of fertiliser on the SOM content and quality was visible in long-term field experiments with short crop rotation. The highest SOM quality was recorded after the farmyard manure application (highest HA, PWI, TG content, and WSA). The barley straw incorporation (once per three years) contributed to the stabilisation of SOM. This technology must be maximally used especially in crop rotations without perennial, forage crops (alfalfa, clover) and farms without animal husbandry. The application of sewage sludge can also be used. This, however, introduces the risk of dangerous risk element contamination. Mineral nitrogen fertiliser increased the C_SOM content in comparison with the unfertilised control. On the other hand, some SOM quality indicators were affected negatively, especially the HA value.