<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Soil Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Soil Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Soil Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2673-8619</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsoil.2021.757839</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Soil Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Dual Inoculation With Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Phosphorus Solubilizing Fungi Synergistically Enhances the Mobilization and Plant Uptake of Phosphorus From Meat and Bone Meal</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Jatana</surname> <given-names>Bhupinder Singh</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Kitchens</surname> <given-names>Christopher</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ray</surname> <given-names>Christopher</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Gerard</surname> <given-names>Patrick</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Tharayil</surname> <given-names>Nishanth</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/97095/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University</institution>, <addr-line>Clemson, SC</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Chemical Engineering, Clemson University</institution>, <addr-line>Clemson, SC</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Edisto Research and Education Center, Clemson University</institution>, <addr-line>Clemson, SC</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University</institution>, <addr-line>Clemson, SC</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Tales Tiecher, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Mahaveer P. Sharma, ICAR Indian Institute of Soybean Research, India; Orivaldo Jos&#x000E9; Saggin J&#x000FA;nior, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), Brazil</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x0002A;Correspondence: Nishanth Tharayil <email>ntharay&#x00040;clemson.edu</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><p>This article was submitted to Plant-Soil Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Soil Science</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn002"><p>&#x02020;ORCID: Bhupinder Singh Jatana <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6250-8342">orcid.org/0000-0001-6250-8342</ext-link></p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>30</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>1</volume>
<elocation-id>757839</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>12</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2021 Jatana, Kitchens, Ray, Gerard and Tharayil.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Jatana, Kitchens, Ray, Gerard and Tharayil</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license> 
</permissions>
<abstract><p>Phosphorus (P) is the second most important mineral nutrient for plant growth and plays a vital role in maintaining global food security. The natural phosphorus reserves [phosphate rock (PR)] are declining at an unprecedented rate, which will threaten the sustainable food supply in near future. Rendered animal byproducts such as meat and bone meal (MBM), could serve as a sustainable alternative to meet crop phosphorus demand. Even though nitrogen (N) from MBM is readily mineralized within a few days, &#x0003E;75% of the P in MBM is present as calcium phosphate that is sparingly available to plants. Thus, application of MBM with the aim of meeting crop N demand could result in buildup of P reserves in soil, which necessitates the need to improve the P mobilization from MBM to achieve higher plant P use efficiency. Here, we tested the potential of two microbial inoculum-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and P solubilizing fungi (<italic>Penicillium bilaiae</italic>), in improving the mobilization of P from MBM and the subsequent P uptake by maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic>). Compared to the non-inoculated MBM control, the application of <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> increased the P mobilization from MBM by more than two-fold and decreased the content of calcium bound P in the soil by 26%. However, despite this mobilization, <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> did not increase the tissue content of P in maize. On the other hand, AMF inoculation with MBM increased the plant root, shoot biomass, and plant P uptake as compared to non-inoculated control, but did not decrease the calcium bound P fraction of the soil, indicating there was limited P mobilization. The simultaneous application of both AMF and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> in association with MBM resulted in the highest tissue P uptake of maize with a concomitant decrease in the calcium bound P in the soil, indicating the complementary functional traits of AMF and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> in plant P nutrition from MBM. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation with MBM also increased the plant photosynthesis rate (27%) and root phosphomonoesterase activity (40%), which signifies the AMF associated regulation of plant physiology. Collectively, our results demonstrate that P mobilization and uptake efficiency from MBM could be improved with the combined use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</kwd>
<kwd>maize</kwd>
<kwd>meat and bone meal</kwd>
<kwd>phosphorus solubilizing microbes</kwd>
<kwd>soil phosphorus</kwd>
<kwd>synergistic effect</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Institute of Food and Agriculture<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100005825</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="9"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="52"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="7677"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Phosphorus (P) is a key nutrient for plant growth and thus its continued supply is critical for achieving global food security. More than 90% of raw material for P fertilizer is harvested from natural reserves of phosphate rock (PR), which is a non-renewable source (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). The current global reserves of PR (16,000 MT), at the present consumption rate (160 MT year<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), are expected to deplete within the next 100 years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>), which threatens sustainable food production. Low P use efficiency of crops (20&#x02013;25%) exacerbates this problem, requiring constant addition of P fertilizers to meet their P demand. Better recycling of P from P-rich agricultural byproducts such as meat and bone meal (MBM) is a promising avenue to recapture and reuse the P in the agricultural production systems. The annual production of MBM is estimated to be 2.5 MT (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>) and 18 MT (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>) in the United State and Europe, respectively. Commercially available MBM is nutrient-rich and contains up to 8% nitrogen (N) and 5&#x02013;10% P, and thus can be used as a potential N and P fertilizer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). The N in MBM is in proteinaceous forms, which can be readily mineralized to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, more than 75% of P in MBM is calcium-bound P (as hydroxyapatite) with low bioavailability for plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). Application of MBM to supplement the N requirement of the crops could thus result in bioaccumulation of residual P in soil, which may facilitate the P contamination of water bodies from soil erosion. Thus, there is an urgent need to improve the mobilization and plant uptake of P from MBM for its sustainable, efficient, and economical use as an organic fertilizer.</p>
<p>Phosphorus acquisition and uptake by plants can be enhanced by modulating the activity of the microbial community in the rhizosphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>). Soil microbiota with complementary functional traits can promote P mobilization and plant uptake through different mechanisms, including mineralization, solubilization of recalcitrant P by releasing organic acids, and mycorrhizae-mediated plant P uptake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>). Among the potential P mobilizing soil microbes, mycorrhizal fungi are the most widely studied in relation to plant P nutrition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are the most common mycorrhizal fungi, which form symbiotic associations with more than 80% of vascular plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). The AMF is an obligate biotroph and produces an extensive mycelial network in the soil, which plays an important role in plant uptake of soil nutrients, most notably P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). Moreover, AMF provides additional benefits to plants through enhancing soil aggregate formation and stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>), enhancing plant resistance to root pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>), and improving plant-soil-water relations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). The root-mycelial network explores a much larger soil volume than the roots alone, which is critical for the uptake of immobile nutrients like P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). Along with P foraging activity, AMF has also been reported to increase the mineralization rate of phosphate minerals through the release of chelating compounds and phosphatase enzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>).</p>
<p>Apart from mycorrhizal fungi, phosphorus solubilizing microbes (PSM) can solubilize the recalcitrant P in the soil. Many of the calcium phosphates, including PR ores are insoluble in soil with respect to the release of inorganic P at rates necessary to support agronomic levels of plant productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). A wide range of soil bacteria and fungi can solubilize the P from apatites and other mineral P forms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>). Soil bacteria and non-symbiotic fungi enhance the plant-available P in the soil through acidification, or by releasing organic acids or enzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>). Generally, the P solubilizing fungi produce more organic acids than bacteria per unit cell count and consequently exhibit greater P-solubilizing activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>). Among the P solubilizing fungi, <italic>Penicillium</italic> sp. are considered the most efficient P solubilizers. For example, <italic>Penicillium bilaiae</italic> (<italic>P. bilaiae</italic>), a native soil fungus that is commercially available (Jumpstart&#x000AE;) as a soil amendment, has the greater ability to increases P availability from PR through soil acidification as compared to other PSM&#x00027;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>). Solubility of apatites increases with a PSM-mediated decrease in soil pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>). However, MBM mineralization increases the soil pH up to 8.5 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>), which can potentially hinder the acidification mediated P mobilization by PSM.</p>
<p>Soil inoculation with a combination of AMF and PSM can be a promising strategy for mobilization and uptake of residual plant unavailable soil P. The PSM can solubilize inorganic P minerals through acidification and chelation but lacks the ability to assist plant uptake of mobilized P from farther reaches of soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>). On the other hand, AMF through their extensive hyphal network can facilitate the plant P uptake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>) but have very limited ability to mobilize P from sparingly available P forms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>). Thus, both AMF and PSM can complement the plant uptake of soil P. The results from previous studies using a combination of AMF and PSM have been inconclusive, with neutral (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>), synergistic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>) or antagonistic interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>). The AMF and PSM interact with each other for carbon (C) and P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>) and the outcome of this interaction (synergism or antagonism) depends upon the background P availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). Under low soil C and P, AMF, and PSM can have antagonistic interactions for P mobilization from sparingly available P forms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). The MBM contains labile C and more than 10% of total P as labile organic P that can potentially alter the direction of AMF-PSM interactions toward synergism, which remains largely unexplored.</p>
<p>The objectives of the present work were to assess the potential of PSM (<italic>P. bilaiae</italic>) and AMF and their interactions in improving the P mobilization and plant uptake from the MBM. We hypothesize that, due to their complementary P mobilization and acquisition features, when applied together, the <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> and AMF will interact synergistically to improve the mobilization and uptake of P from MBM. We tested the hypothesis through lab incubation and greenhouse experiments with different combinations of AMF and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>, using maize as the study species. We predicted that growth and tissue concentration of P of maize will be higher when MBM is applied in combination with AMF and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>, than MBM with either one of the inoculums or MBM alone.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<p>The MBM was obtained from Valley Proteins Inc. (Wards, SC, USA). It was sieved to a diameter &#x0003C;0.5 mm and subjected to an autoclaving treatment at 133&#x000B0;C for 40 min. Lipids in the MBM were extracted in a Soxhlet extractor using n-hexane as the solvent. Lipids are extracted from MBM for their potential use in the biofuel, lubricant, and pharmaceutical industries. Moreover, such a process can decrease the volume of MBM, lower the C:N:P ratio, and increase the fertilizer value of MBM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). Extracted and powdered MBM was dried and stored at room temperature before further use. The extracted MBM contains a total of 11.3% P, measuring by calcination at 600&#x000B0;C for 1 h followed by acid digestion. Soil samples were collected from Simpson Research and Education Center, Pendleton, South Carolina, USA (34.623350 N, &#x02212;82.730030 W). The soil was collected from 0 to 15 cm depth, air-dried, passed through a 2 mm sieve, autoclaved at 121&#x000B0;C for 1 h, and stored until further use. The soil was Cecil clay loam with pH, CEC, base saturation, and organic matter content of 5.6, 3.2 meq/100 g, 59, and 0.62%, respectively. The soil contained 33.18 and 65.01 kg/ha of plant-available P and potassium (K), respectively. Two separate experiments were conducted to assess the rate of P mobilization and plant uptake from MBM: (1) a lab experiment to evaluate the P mobilization capacity of <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> from MBM and (2) greenhouse experiments to test the effect of <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> and AMF alone and in combination to assess the P mobilization and plant P uptake from MBM. Phosphorus solubilizing fungi (<italic>P. bilaiae</italic>) was obtained from a commercially available P solubilizer product named Jumpstart&#x000AE; (Monsanto, USA). We purchased the AMF mixture of four fungal species including <italic>Glomus intraradices, Glomus mosseae, Glomus aggregatum</italic>, and <italic>Glomus etunicatum</italic>, from the commercial product named Myco apply (Mycorrhizae Applications, Oregon, USA). Idaho PR was used to compare the P mobilization capacity of <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> from MBM and PR for the lab incubation experiment was obtained from the International Ag Labs, Fairmont, Minnesota.</p>
<sec>
<title>Experimental Setup</title>
<sec>
<title>Lab Incubation Study</title>
<p>The lab incubation study was conducted to measure the P mobilization capacity of the <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> from MBM as per the approach reported by Wakelin et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>) for tri-calcium phosphate. Finely ground (50&#x02013;250 &#x003BC;m size) MBM (0.1 g) and Idaho PR (equivalent amount P) were mixed with 100 ml of sterilized culture medium (0.1 g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> NaCl, 0.4 g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> NH<sub>4</sub>Cl, 0.78 g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, KNO<sub>3</sub>, 0.5 g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> MgSO<sub>4</sub>, 0.1 g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> CaCl<sub>2</sub>, and 10 g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> sucrose) in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks. The <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> culture (200 &#x003BC;g) was inoculated into five replicate flasks and incubated at 25&#x000B0;C in dark with continuously gentle shaking. Six treatments were included in this experiment: Control, Control &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>, MBM, MBM &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>, Idaho PR, and Idaho PR &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> in a completely randomized design. After 7 days of incubation, solution pH, soluble <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> and ergosterol content were measured.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Greenhouse Experiments</title>
<p>A greenhouse experiment was conducted to measure the effect of AMF, <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>, and AMF &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> on the P mobilization and plant P uptake from MBM. The pots (12 L) were filled with a 12 kg sand-soil (9:1) mixture with a bulk density of 1.543 g cm<sup>&#x02212;3</sup>. The sand and soil were steam autoclaved at 121&#x000B0;C for 1 h. The low proportion of soil in the substrate was to minimize the background P content and was based on preliminary greenhouse experiments. The nutrient free white sand with a bulk density of 1.72 g cm<sup>&#x02212;3</sup> and pH of 7.5 was used in the study. A total of 6 treatments (control, MBM, MBM &#x0002B; AMF, MBM &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>, MBM &#x0002B; AMF &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>, and KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>) were tested in a greenhouse experiment and replicated five times in a completely randomized design. The MBM was applied at a rate of 800 &#x003BC;g P pot<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. The AMF and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> culture were applied at a rate of 25 g pot<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (132 spores g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) and 0.5 g pot<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (8.0 <sup>&#x0002A;</sup> 10<sup>8</sup> spores g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), respectively. The pots were filled in three layers with the first 3 cm layer without any P fertilizers and P mobilizer inoculum, middle 15 cm layer mixed with P fertilizers and AMF and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> inoculum, and top 3 cm layer again without any P fertilizers and P mobilizer inoculum. All the other essential macro and micro-nutrients were applied using the modified 1x Hoagland solution (P free; 300 ml after every 4 days). The maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic>) was used as a test plant species for this experiment. Three maize seeds were sown in each pot and after germination thinned to one plant per pot. Plants were harvested 40 days after planting. Plant shoot, root biomass, shoot, root P uptake, percent root mycorrhizae colonization, root morphology, plant photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, root acid phosphomonoesterase activity, soil P fractionation, and soil acid, alkaline phosphomonoesterase activity, were measured.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Ergosterol</title>
<p>Ergosterol (lab incubation) was extracted as reported by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>). Thirty milliliters of the incubation solution was filtered through a 0.45 &#x003BC;m nitrocellulose filter paper. The filter paper along with filtrate was dissolved into 0.14 M methanolic KOH and incubated at 82&#x000B0;C for 50 min in dark. After the incubation, samples were placed on the ice for 5 min and acidified to a pH &#x0003C; 2 with 0.5 ml of 50% HCl. To the acidified samples, 2 ml of hexane was added and vortexed for 5 min under dark conditions. The top hexane phase (1.5 ml) was collected into the glass vials and dried under a vacuum. The dried contents were reconstituted in 20 &#x003BC;l of chloroform &#x0002B; 80 &#x003BC;l of methanol and transferred into glass vials with 200 &#x003BC;l inserts. The control samples were spiked with 0.5 &#x003BC;g/ml of ergosterol standard. Ergosterol was quantified using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Separation of ergosterol compounds was performed on an Onyx C18 column (monolithic silica, 130 &#x000C5;; 100 &#x000D7; 4.6 mm I.D.; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) using a constant flow of methanol-water (99:1, v/v) solvent at a rate of 1 ml min<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. Ergosterol was detected at 282 nm absorbance using LC-UV and quantified using ergosterol standards.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Soil P Fractionation</title>
<p>Soil P fractionation was carried out according to the method reported by Hedley et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>). The soil at the time of harvest was subjected to sequential chemical extraction with 1 M NH<sub>4</sub>Cl, 0.5 M NaHCO<sub>3</sub>, chloroform fumigation &#x0002B; 0.5 M NaHCO<sub>3</sub>, 0.1 M NaOH, and 1 M HCl, in the specified order. Soil (4 g on a dry weight basis) was extracted with 40 ml of different extractants for 16 h. After extraction, the soil slurry was centrifuged at 1,509 <italic>g</italic> for 10 min and the supernatant was filtered through a Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The supernatant for 0.5 M NaHCO<sub>3</sub> and 0.1 M NaOH extractions was further filtered through 0.45 &#x003BC;m syringe filters to remove humic acid. The clear filtrate was stored at &#x02212;20&#x000B0;C until further use. The soluble P from each fraction was determined by the molybdenum blue/ ascorbic acid method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>). The extraction procedure fractionates the P into loosely sorbed-P (NH<sub>4</sub>Cl-P), olsen-P (NaHCO<sub>3</sub>-P), microbial bound P (chloroform fumigation &#x0002B; NaHCO<sub>3</sub>-P), Fe/Al-P (NaOH-P), and calcium bound-P [HCl-P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>)]. Soil pH was measured in water: soil solution with a 2:1 (v:w) ratio on the pH meter (Mettler Toledo, USA).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Soil Phosphomonoesterase Activity</title>
<p>Soil acid and alkaline phosphomonoesterase activity were measured according to the method reported by Jatana et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). Soil (1 g on a dry weight basis) immediately after harvest was mixed with 4 ml of modified universal buffer [MUB; 2.42 g tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, 2.32 g maleic acid, 2.8 g citric acid, 1.26 g boric acid in 96.7 ml 1 N NaOH in total 1 L] of pH 6.5 (with 0.1 M HCl; acid phosphomonoesterase) or pH 11.0 (with 0.1 M NaOH; alkaline phosphomonoesterase). The soil buffer solution was incubated in the water bath for 1 h at 37&#x000B0;C after mixing with 1 ml of 0.05 M disodium p-nitrophenyl phosphate hexahydrate (prepared in the same MUB for acid and alkaline phosphomonoesterase). After the incubation, the reaction was immediately terminated by adding 1 ml of 0.5 M CaCl<sub>2</sub> and 4 ml of 0.5 M NaOH. The soil suspension was then centrifuged at 1509 g for 10 min. The clear solution was filtered through a Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The absorbance of the clear supernatant was measured at 410 nm on a spectrophotometer (DU&#x000AE; 640 spectrophotometer, Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA). The substrate solution (disodium p-nitrophenyl phosphate hexahydrate) was added to the control after the addition of 1 ml 0.5 M CaCl<sub>2</sub> and 4 ml 0.5 M NaOH. Both enzyme activities were expressed as &#x003BC;g p-nitrophenol (PNP) g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> dry soil h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Root Morphology</title>
<p>Root morphology of plants at harvest was evaluated by imaging the roots with Win-RHIZO version 3.9 (Regent Instruments Inc.). Specifically, roots were physically separated into different root types (primary, crown, and lateral roots) and the root images were taken in a plexiglass tray (0.2 &#x000D7; 0.3 m). The images were scanned through the Win-RHIZO system. After the root image analysis, the root samples were dried to calculate the specific root length (SRL; root length/dry weight of the roots).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Root Mycorrhizal Colonization</title>
<p>Percent root mycorrhizal colonization was observed using the trypan blue staining procedure reported by Frater et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>). Roots were cleaned in a 10% KOH solution at 60&#x000B0;C for 24 h. After cleaning, the roots were washed with deionized water for 10 min followed by acidification in 1% HCl for 20 min. The acidified roots were soaked in trypan blue (0.05%, trypan blue powder) solution made in 1:1:1 (v:v:v) glycerol, lactic acid, water for 5 min on a hot plate set at 90&#x000B0;C. The roots were taken out of the trypan blue solution and washed gently under deionized water for 10 min. The washed roots were kept in deionized water at 4&#x000B0;C for a couple of days to remove the excess trypan dye present in the roots. We then assessed the percentage of root colonized by AMF using the gridline intercept technique (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>). This technique determines the presence/absence of fungal organs (i.e., arbuscules/hyphae/vesicles) for each instance that a root intersected with a gridline.</p>
<disp-formula id="E1"><mml:math id="M4"><mml:mtable columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x0002A;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Root Phosphomonoesterase Activity</title>
<p>Root phosphomonoesterase activity was measured as reported by Venterink (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>). Roots tips were collected after thorough washing with deionized water. The washed root tips were immediately frozen in dry ice and stored at &#x02212;80&#x000B0;C for later analysis. Frozen root tips were ground into a fine powder, weighed (250 mg), and homogenized at 6,000 rpm for 2 min in 500 &#x003BC;l (1:2, m/v) of MUB [100 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, 100 mM maleic acid, 5 mM citric acid, and 100 mM boric acid; pH 5.5 for acid phosphomonoesterase]. Homogenized root tissues were centrifuged at 14,000 g for 15 min at 4&#x000B0;C and the supernatant was collected. To the 300 &#x003BC;l of supernatant, 4 ml of MUB and 1 ml of 0.003 M p-nitrophenyl phosphate hexahydrate were added and vortexed for 30 s. The mixture was then incubated at 37&#x000B0;C for 10 min in a water bath. After the incubation, the reaction was terminated by adding 1 ml 0.5 M CaCl<sub>2</sub> and 4 ml 0.5 M NaOH. The precipitates were recovered by centrifugation at 12,000 <italic>g</italic> for 15 min. The PNP content of the supernatant was quantified spectrophotometrically (DU&#x000AE; 640 spectrophotometer, Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA) at 410 nm by using an authentic standard (PNP). Enzyme activity was expressed as &#x003BC;g pPNP g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> root h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Gas Exchange Measurements</title>
<p>Net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance of individual leaves were measured between 09:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. at 18 and 36 days after planting. Two recently fully opened leaves were selected from each plant and analyzed using a portable photosynthesis system (model LI-6400, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). The leaf blade width was measured before inserting the maize leaf into the chamber to account for the leaf area. The LI-6400 was programmed with a constant leaf chamber block temperature at 25&#x000B0;C. A fixed substrate level of 400 mm<sup>3</sup> m<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> CO<sub>2</sub> (12-g cartridge) and an LED 6,400 R/B light at 1,500 &#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s <sup>&#x02212;1</sup> were provided.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>The laboratory and greenhouse experiments were conducted in a completely randomized design with five replicates. The one-way analysis of variance was performed on the data using JMP Pro 13.1.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC). Different treatment pairs were compared using the Tukey HSD test. The treatments were considered significantly different at the <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05 level. The data for the percent mycorrhizae colonization were log-transformed to meet the assumption of normality before the analysis of variance.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>P Mobilization From MBM by <italic>Penicillium bilaiae</italic> (Lab Incubation)</title>
<p>The MBM contained three major mineral forms of P, which were water-soluble P, organic P, and calcium bound P (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). The major mineral form of P in MBM was calcium bound P (&#x0003E;75%). Approximately 15% of the P was present as organic P in MBM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). MBM mineralization increased the pH of the incubation solution from 5.9 to 7.1. The increase in soil pH was largely due to the N mineralization from MBM. However, MBM &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> significantly decreased the solution pH to 4.2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). In the absence of <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>, we observed a similar amount of P mobilization from MBM and Idaho PR. By contrast, when <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> was present in the incubation solution, 34% higher amount of P mobilized from MBM &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> as compared to Idaho PR &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). Moreover, the highest ergosterol content was observed in the MBM &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Different mineral forms of phosphorus (P) in MBM. Different alphabetic letters signify the statistical difference (Tukey test, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) across the different mineral forms of P. Error bar represents the mean &#x000B1; SD (<italic>n</italic> = 5).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-757839-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Solution pH <bold>(A)</bold>, PO<sub>4</sub><sup>&#x02212;</sup> <bold>(B)</bold>, and ergosterol <bold>(C)</bold> content as affected by different P fertilizers and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> at 7 days after incubation. Different alphabetical letters signify the statistical difference (Tukey test, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) across the treatments. Error bar represents the mean &#x000B1; SD (<italic>n</italic> = 5).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-757839-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Maize Shoot and Root Characteristics (Greenhouse Experiment)</title>
<p>The application of KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> recorded the highest shoot and root biomass and tissue P uptake (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). The MBM treatment recorded significantly higher shoot, root biomass, and tissue uptake of P into shoot and root, as compared to control (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.0001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). The application of MBM &#x0002B; AMF &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> recorded significantly higher plant shoot (24%), root (29%) biomass, and shoot and root uptake of P as compared to MBM alone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). However, the application of MBM &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> did not have any effect on the shoot, root biomass, and tissue P uptake (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Plant shoot <bold>(A)</bold>, root biomass <bold>(B)</bold>, shoot P <bold>(C)</bold>, and root P uptake <bold>(D)</bold> as affected by different P fertilizers and P mobilizers (arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF) and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>) at 40 days after planting. Different alphabetical letters signify the statistical difference (Tukey test, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) across the treatments. Error bar represents the mean &#x000B1; SD (<italic>n</italic> = 5).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-757839-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The highest SRL for the primary roots of the maize was recorded in control and MBM &#x0002B; different P mobilizers (AMF, <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>, AMF &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>) as compared to KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>). The MBM with different P mobilizers (AMF, <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>, AMF &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>) had significantly higher SRL (195, 163, and 162% higher, respectively) for the primary roots as compared to MBM alone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>). However, the MBM treatment did not have any effect on the SRL of the crown roots (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>). The highest SRL for the lateral roots was observed in MBM with and without different P mobilizers as compared to KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4C</xref>). The highest root acid phosphomonoesterase activity was observed in the MBM with different P mobilizers (AMF, <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>, AMF &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>) as compared to MBM alone, control, and KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4D</xref>). Application of different P mobilizers (AMF, <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>, AMF &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>) with MBM significantly increased the acid phosphomonoesterase activity by 24.5, 25.4, and 26.2%, respectively, as compared to MBM alone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4D</xref>). The root AMF colonization was significantly higher in the MBM &#x0002B; AMF and MBM &#x0002B; AMF &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> as compared to all other treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4E</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Specific root length for primary <bold>(A)</bold>, crown <bold>(B)</bold>, lateral <bold>(C)</bold> roots, root acid phosphomonoesterase activity <bold>(D)</bold>, and percent root arbuscular mycorrhizae colonization <bold>(E)</bold> as affected by different P fertilizers and P mobilizers (arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF) and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>) at 40 days after planting. Different alphabetical letters signify the statistical difference (Tukey test, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) across the treatments. Error bar represents the mean &#x000B1; SD (<italic>n</italic> = 5).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-757839-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Gas Exchange and Stomatal Conductance (Greenhouse Experiment)</title>
<p>The KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> treatment recorded the highest photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance as compared to MBM and control at 18 days after sowing (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). However, at 36 days after sowing, the photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance of the maize in the MBM alone treatment was similar to that in the KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). The MBM &#x0002B; AMF treatment recorded significantly higher plant photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance as compared to MBM alone at both 18 and 36 days after sowing and as compared to KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> at 36 days after sowing (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>Plant photosynthesis rate <bold>(A)</bold> and stomatal conductance <bold>(B)</bold> as affected by different P fertilizers and P mobilizers (arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF) and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>). Different alphabetical letters signify the statistical difference (Tukey test, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) across the treatments. Error bar represents the mean &#x000B1; SD (<italic>n</italic> = 5).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-757839-g0005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Soil P Fractionation and Biochemical Properties (Greenhouse Experiment)</title>
<p>The soil content of loosely sorbed P (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6A</xref>) and olsen P (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6B</xref>) was higher in the KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> treatment as compared to MBM and control. The MBM &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> recorded significantly higher loosely sorbed (194%) and olsen P (61%) content as compared to MBM alone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). The MBM fertilization significantly increased the microbial P content (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.0001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6D</xref>) in the soil fraction as compared to control and KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> treatments. The highest amount of microbial P was observed in the MBM &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> treatment followed by the treatment with the mixture of MBM &#x0002B; AMF &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> as compared to MBM alone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6D</xref>). The calcium bound P was the predominant form of P in MBM (118 &#x003BC;g PO<sub>4</sub> g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> soil) treatment as compared to KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> (&#x0003E;10 &#x003BC;g PO<sub>4</sub> g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> soil) and control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6E</xref>). However, the treatments of MBM &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> (87 &#x003BC;g PO<sub>4</sub> g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> soil) and MBM &#x0002B; AMF &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> (85 &#x003BC;g PO<sub>4</sub> g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> soil), had significantly lower soil content of calcium bound P (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.0001), as compared to MBM alone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6E</xref>). The major P fraction in KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> treatments was tissue uptake P (approximately 23%; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>). However, in the MBM treatments, the major fraction of P was calcium bound P (46% of total applied P) that was unavailable to plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>). Approximately 20&#x02013;25% of P applied to pots did not attribute to any fraction (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>). The application of MBM &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> significantly decreased the pH of the soil (5.4) as compared to all other treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6F</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p>Mineral P forms, loosely sorbed P <bold>(A)</bold>, olsen P <bold>(B)</bold>, Fe/Al bound P <bold>(C)</bold>, microbial biomass P <bold>(D)</bold>, Ca bound P <bold>(E)</bold>, and soil pH <bold>(F)</bold> as affected by different P fertilizers and P mobilizers (arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF) and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>) at 40 days after planting. Different alphabetical letters signify the statistical difference (Tukey test, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) across the treatments. Error bar represents the mean &#x000B1; SD (<italic>n</italic> = 5).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-757839-g0006.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption><p>Soil P fractionation (% of total P applied) as affected by different P fertilizers and P mobilizers (arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF) and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>) at 40 days after planting.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-757839-g0007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The application of MBM significantly increased the acid phosphomonoesterase activity as compared to control and KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.0001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8A</xref>). The application of different P mobilizers (AMF, <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>, and AMF &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>) with MBM significantly increased the acid phosphomonoesterase activity by 61, 44, and 55%, respectively as compared to MBM alone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8A</xref>). However, different treatments had no significant effect on the soil&#x00027;s alkaline phosphomonoesterase activity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption><p>Soil potential acid <bold>(A)</bold> and alkaline <bold>(B)</bold> phosphomonoesterase activity as affected by different P fertilizers and P mobilizers (arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF) and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>) at 40 days after planting. Different alphabetical letters signify the statistical difference (Tukey test, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) across the treatments. Error bar represents the mean &#x000B1; SD (<italic>n</italic> = 5).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-757839-g0008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec>
<title>P Mobilization From MBM by <italic>Penicillium bilaiae</italic></title>
<p>A higher proportion of P is present as calcium bound P in the MBM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>), which is unavailable to plants. Due to the potential to increase the soil pH during initial N mineralization, the application of concentrated organic N and P fertilizes such as MBM can hamper the P mobilization from Ca-bound P fractions. Hence, <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> that counteracts the pH increase, can increase the rate of P mineralization from MBM, and has been considered as one of the most important P mobilizers for the field-grown crop plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>). In our lab incubation study, mineralization of MBM increased the pH of the incubation media, which is consistent with previous observations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). As reported from previous studies with calcium phosphate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>), the application of <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> increased the P mobilization rate from MBM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). Even though the exact mechanism of P mobilization by <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> in our study is not evident, based on the previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>), we propose that H<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> and organic acids released by the <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> to facilitate this process. This is partly evident from the lower soil solution pH in MBM &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). The labile C in MBM could act as an energy source for <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> and stimulate a greater fungal biomass production, which in turn will facilitate greater mobilization of P from MBM. This in turn is supported by the higher soil ergosterol content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>), a fungal biomarker, in MBM &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> treatments. Thus, higher <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> biomass primed by C availability could have resulted in higher P mobilization from MBM.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>P Mobilization and Plant P Uptake From MBM With a Mixture of AMF and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic></title>
<p>In accordance with our hypothesis, the application of <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> &#x0002B; AMF in MBM treatments significantly increased the P uptake (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3C,D</xref>). The synergistic interaction between the PSMs and AMF for the plant P uptake has been reported in previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>). Our study showed that the synergistic interaction of AMF and PSMs for plant P uptake from MBM might be largely related to their complementary functional traits. Phosphorus solubilizing microbes possessed the capacity to mobilize the P from recalcitrant P fractions, while AMF could help plants to explore the soil for mobilized P that are beyond the root system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>). This notion is supported by the similar tissue P content of maize in MBM &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> as that of the non-inoculated MBM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>), despite a higher soil labile P and lower Ca bound P (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). On the other hand, MBM &#x0002B; AMF &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> treatment resulted in a higher tissue P content despite having similar soil labile P, and Ca-bound P fraction as that of MBM &#x0002B; <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> treatment.</p>
<p>Along with mycorrhizae and PSM mediated P mobilization and uptake, plants also mobilize P from sparingly available P forms by modulating their root morphology and physiology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>). In our study, we observed higher SRL of the primary and lateral roots (morphological response) and root acid phosphomonoesterase activity (physiological response) in MBM treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). Thinner roots under P deficiency are efficient at exploring larger soil volume per unit root biomass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>). Also, plant root morphology is closely linked to the plant root exudation such as the release of organic acids and phosphatases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>). Fine roots are known to exude organic acids and phosphomonoesterases, phosphodiesterases, and phytases for the mobilization and mineralization of P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>). Such relations between thinner roots and activity of phoshomonoesterases would work synergistically under P deficiency in maximizing the acquisition of immobile P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>). The P mobilizers (AMF, <italic>P. bilaiae</italic>, and AMF &#x0002B; <italic>P. biliaiae</italic>) contributed to the highest SRL for primary roots and root acid phosphomonoesterase activity in MBM treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>), which indicates that the interaction effect of sparingly available P and P mobilizers might further regulate the plant root morphological and physiological response to P availability. The ability of plants to modify the composition of root exudation as a function of the chemical form of P source has been recently reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">51</xref>).</p>
<p>Similar to that observed in the roots, we observed higher soil acid phosphomonoesterase activity in MBM treatment. Phosphomonoesterases, which are exudated by plants and microbes, can mineralize the P from organic fractions of MBM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>). Higher activity of phosphomonoesterases can indicate the higher mineralization rate of organic P into H<sub>2</sub><inline-formula><mml:math id="M5"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>HPO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>). However, the increase in the activity of acid phosphomonoesterases, but not the alkaline phosphomonoesterases, might be due to lower soil pH, as acid phosphomonoesterase are more active at soil pH lower than 7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">52</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption><p>Schematic diagram representing the different MBM_ phosphorous fractions and arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi, <italic>Penicillium bilaiae</italic> and their interaction effect for the mobilization of different MBM_P fractions.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-757839-g0009.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s5">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Our study highlights the synergistic effects of AMF and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> in improving the mobilization and plant uptake of P from MBM. The synergistic effect of the AMF and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> for P mobilization from MBM was attributed to their complementary functional traits and through the modulation of the root morphology and biochemical properties of roots and soil pH, which in turn lead to a greater P acquisition of maize from MBM. The MBM formulations with AMF and <italic>P. bilaiae</italic> can potentially increase the P fertilization value of MBM apart from its already established N fertilization potential. Such a strategy can help in maximizing the MBM utilization along with minimizing the potential of MBM in creating residual P pollution in the soils.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>BJ and NT designed the experiment. BJ conducted the experiment, collected, analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the manuscript revisions.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research project was funded by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA NIFA award: 2016-67020-25264).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s9">
<title>Publisher&#x00027;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec> 
</body>
<back>
<ack><p>We would like to thank Ziliang Zhang for his feedback on the earlier version of the manuscript.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cordell</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drangert</surname> <given-names>JO</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought</article-title>. <source>Glob Environ Change.</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>292</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>305</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.009</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Efthymiou</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jakobsen</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The roles of mycorrhiza and Penicillium inoculants in phosphorus uptake by biochar-amended wheat</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>127</volume>:<fpage>168</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>77</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.09.027</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cooper</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lombardi</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boardman</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carliell-Marquet</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The future distribution and production of global phosphate rock reserves</article-title>. <source>Resour Conserv Recycl.</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>57</volume>:<fpage>78</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>86</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11537854</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vassilev</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martos</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mendes</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martos</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vassileva</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Biochar of animal origin: a sustainable solution to the global problem of high-grade rock phosphate scarcity?</article-title> <source>J. Sci Food Agri.</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>93</volume>:<fpage>1799</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>804</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.6130</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23504602</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Swisher</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Market report: prices are down but demand remains strong</article-title>. <source>Render Magazine.</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>45</volume>:<fpage>10</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moller</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oberson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x000FC;nemann</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cooper</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friedel</surname> <given-names>JK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glaesner</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Improved phosphorus recycling in organic farming: navigating between constraints</article-title>. <source>Adv Agron.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>147</volume>:<fpage>159</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>237</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/bs.agron.2017.10.004</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jatana</surname> <given-names>BS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kitchens</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ray</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tharayil</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Regulating the nutrient release rates from proteinaceous agricultural byproducts using organic amendments and its effect on soil chemical and microbiological properties</article-title>. <source>Biol Fert Soils.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>56</volume>:<fpage>747</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>58</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-020-01446-z</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>S&#x000E1;nchez-Esteva</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x000F3;mez-Mu&#x000F1;oz</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname> <given-names>LS</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Neergaard</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Magid</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The effect of Penicillium bilaii on wheat growth and phosphorus uptake as affected by soil pH, soil P and application of sewage sludge</article-title>. <source>Chem Biol Tech Agric.</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>21</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40538-016-0075-3</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>AE</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Prospects for using soil microorganisms to improve the acquisition of phosphorus by plants</article-title>. <source>Australian J Plant Physiol.</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<fpage>897</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>906</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/PP01093</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28948418</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Read</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Mycorrhizal Symbiosis</source>. <edition>3rd ed</edition>. <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>. (<year>2008</year>) p. <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>769</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-012370526-6.50002-7</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rillig</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mummey</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Mycorrhizas and soil structure</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> (<year>2006</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>41</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>53</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01750.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16771981</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Borowicz</surname> <given-names>VA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter plant&#x02013;pathogen relations?</article-title>. <source>Ecology.</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>23057</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>68</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2679834</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11520877</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Auge</surname> <given-names>RM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Water relations, drought and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis</article-title>. <source>Mycorrhiza.</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>3</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>42</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s005720100097</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33874273</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Joner</surname> <given-names>EJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johansen</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phosphatase activity of external hyphae of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</article-title>. <source>Mycological Res.</source> (<year>2000</year>) <volume>104</volume>:<fpage>81</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0953756299001240</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30886898</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Nutrient exchange and regulation in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis</article-title>. <source>Mol plant.</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1147</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>58</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.molp.2017.07.012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30447333</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jilani</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akhtar</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naqvi</surname> <given-names>SMS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rasheed</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria: occurrence, mechanisms and their role in crop production</article-title>. <source>J Agric Biol Sci.</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>1</volume>:<fpage>48</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>58</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fraga</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion</article-title>. <source>Biotech Adv.</source> (<year>1999</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>319</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>39</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0734-9750(99)00014-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14538133</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Whitelaw</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Growth promotion of plants inoculated with phosphate solubilizing fungi</article-title>. <source>Adv Agron.</source> (<year>2000</year>) <volume>69</volume>:<fpage>99</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>151</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60948-7</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zaidi</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahemad</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Recent advances in plant growth promotion by phosphate-solubilizing microbes</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name></person-group> editor. <source>Microbial Strategies for Crop Improvement</source>. <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name> (<year>2009</year>). p. <fpage>325</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>51</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-642-01979-1_2</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reddy</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>SK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Babita</surname> <given-names>MSR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Biosolubilization of poorly soluble rock hosphatesby <italic>Aspergillus tubingensis</italic> and <italic>Aspergillus niger</italic></article-title>. <source>Bioresource Technol</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>84</volume>:<fpage>187</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00040-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12139336</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Venkateswarlu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>AV</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raina</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Evaluation of phosphorus solubilization by microorganisms isolated from arid soil</article-title>. <source>J Indian Soc Soil Sci.</source> (<year>1984</year>) <volume>32</volume>:<fpage>273</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cunningham</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuiack</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Production of citric and oxalic acids and solubilization of calcium phosphate by <italic>Penicillium bilaii</italic></article-title>. <source>Appl Environ Microbiol</source>. (<year>1992</year>) <volume>58</volume>:<fpage>1451</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.58.5.1451-1458.1992</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1622211</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vessey</surname> <given-names>JK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heisinger</surname> <given-names>KG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effect of <italic>Penicillium bilaii</italic> inoculation and phosphorus fertilization on root and shoot parameters of field-grown pea</article-title>. <source>Canadian J Plant Sci.</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>361</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4141/P00-083</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chandanie</surname> <given-names>WA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kubota</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hyakumachi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Interactions between the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus <italic>Glomus mosseae</italic> and plant growth-promoting fungi and their significance for enhancing plant growth and suppressing damping-off of cucumber (<italic>Cucumis sativus</italic> L</article-title>.). <source>Appl. Soil. Ecol.</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>41</volume>:<fpage>336</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>41</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.12.006</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Omar</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The role of rock-phosphate-solubilizing fungi and vesicular&#x02013;arbusular-mycorrhiza (VAM) in growth of wheat plants fertilized with rock phosphate</article-title>. <source>World J Microbiol Biotech.</source> (<year>1997</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>211</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Osorio</surname> <given-names>NW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Habte</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effect of a phosphate-solubilizing fungus and an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on leucaena seedlings in tropical soils with contrasting phosphate sorption capacity</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil.</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>389</volume>:<fpage>375</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>85</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-014-2357-5</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kapoor</surname> <given-names>KK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Inoculation with phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms and a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus improves dry matter yield and nutrient uptake by wheat grown in a sandy soil</article-title>. <source>Biol Fertil Soils.</source> (<year>1999</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<fpage>139</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>44</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s003740050475</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barea</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pozo</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azc&#x000F3;n</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azc&#x000F3;n-Aguilar</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere</article-title>. <source>J Exp Bot.</source> (<year>2005</year>) <volume>56</volume>:<fpage>1767</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>78</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/eri197</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15911555</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Toro</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azc&#x000F3;n</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barea</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Improvement of arbuscular mycorrhiza development by inoculation of soil with phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria to improve rock phosphate bioavailability (32P) and nutrient cycling</article-title>. <source>Appl Environ Microb.</source> (<year>1997</year>) <volume>63</volume>:<fpage>4408</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>12</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.63.11.4408-4412.1997</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16535730</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Javaid</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal mediated nutrition in plants</article-title>. <source>J Plant Nutr.</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>32</volume>:<fpage>1595</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>618</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01904160903150875</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hodge</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Carbon and phosphorus exchange may enable cooperation between an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and a phosphate-solubilizing bacterium</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>210</volume>:<fpage>1022</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>32</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13838</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27074400</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wakelin</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Warren</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harvey</surname> <given-names>PR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ryder</surname> <given-names>MH</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phosphate solubilization by <italic>Penicillium</italic> spp. closely associated with wheat roots</article-title>. <source>Biol Fertil Soils.</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>36</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>43</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-004-0750-6</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gessner</surname> <given-names>MO</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chauvet</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Ergosterol-to-biomass conversion factors for aquatic hyphomycetes</article-title>. <source>Appl Environ Microbiol.</source> (<year>1993</year>) <volume>59</volume>:<fpage>502</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.59.2.502-507.1993</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16348874</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hedley</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stewart</surname> <given-names>JWB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chauhan</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Changes in inorganic and organic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc America J.</source> (<year>1982</year>) <volume>46</volume>:<fpage>970</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600050017x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kaiserli</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Voutsa</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Samara</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phosphorus fractionation in lake sediments&#x02013;Lakes Volvi and Koronia, N. Greece</article-title>. <source>Chemosphere</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>46</volume>:<fpage>1147</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>55</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00242-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11951980</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Frater</surname> <given-names>PN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Borer</surname> <given-names>ET</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fay</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knaeble</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seabloom</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Nutrients and environment influence arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization both independently and interactively in Schizachyrium scoparium</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>425</volume>:<fpage>493</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>506</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-018-3597-6</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37.</label>
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Giovannetti</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mosse</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots</article-title>. <source>New phytologist.</source> (<year>1980</year>) <volume>1</volume>:<fpage>489</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>500</lpage>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/2432123">https://www.jstor.org/stable/2432123</ext-link></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Venterink</surname> <given-names>HO</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Legumes have a higher root phosphatase activity than other forbs, particularly under low inorganic P and N supply</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil.</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>347</volume>:<fpage>137</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-011-0834-7</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adhya</surname> <given-names>TK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reddy</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Podile</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bee</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Samantaray</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Microbial mobilization of soil phosphorus and sustainable P management in agricultural soils</article-title>. <source>Curr Sci.</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>108</volume>:<fpage>1280</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>156</volume>:<fpage>997</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1005</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.111.175232</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21571668</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dutta</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neog</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in modulating phosphorus dynamics in turmeric rhizosphere</article-title>. <source>Natl Acad Sci Lett.</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>445</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s40009-017-0582-1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mahanta</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rai</surname> <given-names>RK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dhar</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Varghese</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raja</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Purakayastha</surname> <given-names>TJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Modification of root properties with phosphate solubilizing bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhiza to reduce rock phosphate application in soybean-wheat cropping system</article-title>. <source>Ecol Eng.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>111</volume>:<fpage>31</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>43</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.11.008</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ismail</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heuer</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomson</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wissuwa</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Genetic and genomic approaches to develop rice germplasm for problem soils</article-title>. <source>Plant Mol Biol.</source> (<year>2007</year>) <volume>65</volume>:<fpage>547</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>70</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11103-007-9215-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17703278</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jain</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vasconcelos</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raghothama</surname> <given-names>KG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sahi</surname> <given-names>SV</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Molecular mechanisms of plant adaptation to phosphate deficiency</article-title>. In: Janick J, editor. <source>Plant Breeding Reviews</source>. Vol. <fpage>29</fpage>. (<year>2007</year>) p. <fpage>359</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>419</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/9780470168035.ch7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34412589</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Roots of the second green revolution</article-title>. <source>Aust J Bot.</source> (<year>2007</year>) <volume>55</volume>:<fpage>493</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>512</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/BT06118</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28948418</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koide</surname> <given-names>RT</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eissenstat</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Complementarity in nutrient foraging strategies of absorptive fine roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi across 14 coexisting subtropical tree species</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>208</volume>:<fpage>125</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>36</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13434</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25925733</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>47.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lugli</surname> <given-names>LF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andersen</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arag&#x000E3;o</surname> <given-names>LE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cordeiro</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cunha</surname> <given-names>HF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fuchslueger</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Multiple phosphorus acquisition strategies adopted by fine roots in low-fertility soils in Central Amazonia</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>450</volume>:<fpage>49</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>63</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-019-03963-9</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<label>48.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rubio</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oesterheld</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alvarez</surname> <given-names>CR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lavado</surname> <given-names>RS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Mechanisms for the increase in phosphorus uptake of waterlogged plants: soil phosphorus availability, root morphology and uptake kinetics</article-title>. <source>Oecologia.</source> (<year>1997</year>) <volume>112</volume>:<fpage>150</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s004420050294</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28307564</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<label>49.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>AE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hadobas</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hayes</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Acid phosphomonoesterase and phytase activities of wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.) roots and utilization of organic phosphorus substrates by seedlings grown in sterile culture</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ</source>. <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>397</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>405</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00557.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<label>50.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Watts-Williams</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>FA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jakobsen</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Soil phosphorus availability is a driver of the responses of maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic>) to elevated CO<sub>2</sub> concentration and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization</article-title>. <source>Symbiosis.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>77</volume>:<fpage>73</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>82</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13199-018-0573-0</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<label>51.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edayilam</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montgomery</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maroli</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinez</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powell</surname> <given-names>BA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tharayil</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phosphorus stress-induced changes in plant root exudation could potentially facilitate uranium mobilization from stable mineral forms</article-title>. <source>Environ Sci Technol.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>52</volume>:<fpage>7652</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>62</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.est.7b05836</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29722538</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52">
<label>52.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Frankenberger</surname> <given-names>WTJR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johanson</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effect of pH on enzyme stability in soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>1982</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>433</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(82)90101-8</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
</ref-list> 
</back>
</article>