<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Soil Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Soil Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Soil Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2673-8619</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsoil.2021.738464</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Soil Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Soil Phosphorus Exchange as Affected by Drying-Rewetting of Three Soils From a Hawaiian Climatic Gradient</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Helfenstein</surname> <given-names>Julian</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1401270/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>Emmanuel</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/128047/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Pistocchi</surname> <given-names>Chiara</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/510566/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>Oliver</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/437371/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Tamburini</surname> <given-names>Federica</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/535537/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Z&#x000FC;rich</institution>, <addr-line>Lindau</addr-line>, <country>Switzerland</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>UMR Eco&#x00026;Sols, Montpellier SupAgro</institution>, <addr-line>Montpellier</addr-line>, <country>France</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara</institution>, <addr-line>Santa Barbara, CA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Department of Biology, Stanford University</institution>, <addr-line>Stanford, CA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Hermann Jungkunst, University of Koblenz and Landau, Germany</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Jiabao Li, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China; Francisco Javier Matus, University of La Frontera Temuco, Chile</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x0002A;Correspondence: Federica Tamburini <email>faderica.tamburini&#x00040;usys.ethz.ch</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><p>This article was submitted to Soil Biogeochemistry and Nutrient Cycling, a section of the journal Frontiers in Soil Science</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="present-address" id="fn002"><p>&#x02020;Present address: Julian Helfenstein, Agroscope, Z&#x000FC;rich, Switzerland</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>02</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>1</volume>
<elocation-id>738464</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>08</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>11</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2021 Helfenstein, Frossard, Pistocchi, Chadwick, Vitousek and Tamburini.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Helfenstein, Frossard, Pistocchi, Chadwick, Vitousek and Tamburini</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract><p>Current understanding of phosphorus (P) dynamics is mostly based on experiments carried out under steady-state conditions. However, drying-rewetting is an inherent feature of soil behavior, and as such also impacts P cycling. While several studies have looked at net changes in P pool sizes with drying-rewetting, few studies have dynamically tracked P exchange using isotopes, which would give insights on P mean residence times in a given pool, and thus P availability. Here, we subjected three soils from a climatic gradient on the Kohala peninsula from Hawaii to 5-month drying-rewetting treatments. The hypotheses were that physico-chemical and biotic processes would be differently affected by repeated drying-rewetting cycles, and that response would depend on climatic history of the soils. Soils were labeled with <sup>33</sup>P and <sup>18</sup>O enriched water. At select time intervals, we carried out a sequential extraction and measured P concentration, <sup>33</sup>P recovery (only first 3 months), and incorporation of <sup>18</sup>O from water into phosphate. This allowed tracing P dynamics in sequentially extracted pools as well as O dynamics in phosphate, which are driven by biological processes. Results showed that P concentration and <sup>33</sup>P recovery were predominantly driven by soil type. However, across all soils we observed faster dilution of <sup>33</sup>P from resin-P into less mobile inorganic pools under drying-rewetting. On the other hand, O dynamics in phosphate were mostly governed by drying-rewetting treatment. Under drying-rewetting, considerably less O was incorporated from water into phosphate of resin-P, microbial-P and HCl-P, suggesting that drying-rewetting reduced biological P cycling. Hence, our results suggest that repeated drying-rewetting increases inorganic P exchange while reducing biological P cycling due to reduced microbial activity, independent of climatic history of the soils. This needs to be considered in P management in ecosystems as well as model representations of the terrestrial P cycle.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>andosols</kwd>
<kwd>andisols</kwd>
<kwd>climatic gradient</kwd>
<kwd>oxygen isotopes in phosphate</kwd>
<kwd>phosphorus cycling</kwd>
<kwd>phosphorus radioisotopes</kwd>
<kwd>turnover</kwd>
<kwd>mean residence time</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F&#x000F6;rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001711</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="4"/>
<ref-count count="80"/>
<page-count count="17"/>
<word-count count="11291"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Current representations of the phosphorus (P) cycle in land surface models are based on P exchange rates under constant moisture conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>). However, empirically it is well documented that repeated drying-rewetting, for example due to frequent intermittent rainfall/irrigation events, leads to long-lasting physicochemical and biological changes of soil properties. These changes in soil properties have a large impact on P availability and losses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>), which in turn affects not only the amount of P available for crop production or primary productivity, but also contributes to pollution of aquatic ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>). With climate change, soils are likely to experience changing precipitation regimes, altering the balance of P release and retention through drying-rewetting (DRW). Previous research has warned that major agricultural transformation may be necessary to halt P losses under climate change (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>), however, little is known about the effect of DRW on P exchange in soils, and if response differs in soils with different climatic backgrounds.</p>
<p>Recent research on P exchange showed that P mean residence time in the soil solution is a matter of seconds, in resin-extractable P of minutes, in microbial P and NaOH-extractable inorganic P of weeks to months, and in HCl- extractable P of years to millennia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). Yet these estimates were based on observations of soils under constant soil moisture and or suppressed biological activity. In incubation experiments, repeated DRW drives changes in soil physical/chemical environment that are likely to affect P exchange. Repeated drying-rewetting can alter aggregate structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>). Slaking may lead to aggregate breakdown, exposing new P binding sites to exchange with the soil solution and allowing fixed P to be released (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). Altered aggregate structure may also lead to more binding of dissolved P onto soil surfaces, as it has been shown that drying-rewetting treatments significantly affected P sorption and hence exchange kinetics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). In soils with amorphous soil minerals, such as volcanic soils, DRW can alter soil mineralogy, especially if changing soil moisture affects redox conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). While it has been shown that DRW affects physicochemical soil P cycling, it is not clear if DRW leads to a net increase or decrease of P exchange in various inorganic soil P pools.</p>
<p>In addition to affecting physicochemical soil properties, repeated drying-rewetting alters soil microbial community composition and activity. The sudden rewetting of soil through rainfall or irrigation leads to the bursting of microbes and release of cell contents into the environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). The release of nutrients and organic compounds from burst cells and the release of organic matter from soil aggregates triggers microbial activity and leads to a peak in soil respiration shortly after rewetting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>). Also, different components of the soil microbial community are diversely affected by DRW, and altering of wet and dry conditions may thus lead to changes in soil microbial community structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>). In an experiment looking at two DRW cycles, DRW was reported to increase organic P mineralization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). However, the peak in soil respiration upon re-wetting decreases with each subsequent cycle, and overall microbial biomass becomes smaller (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>). As shown recently for a sandy grassland soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>), one might hypothesize that while DRW may increase organic P mineralization on the short term, repeated DRW reduces soil biological activity and biologically mediated P cycling as compared to under constant moisture.</p>
<p>Here, we asked the question, how does DRW affect P exchange in soils having different climatic histories? The hypotheses were that (1) physico-chemical and biotic processes will be differently affected by repeated drying-rewetting cycles [see (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>)], and that (2) the soils will respond differently based on their climatic history. To address this question, we studied three soils from the Kohala climatic gradient, where large differences in precipitation have created soils that vary substantially in biological activity and mineralogy while having the same parent material (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>). Soils were labeled with <sup>33</sup>PO<sub>4</sub> ions and <sup>18</sup>O-enriched water and then subjected to 3-month (<sup>33</sup>P) and 5-month (<sup>18</sup>O) DRW treatments. At selected time intervals, we carried out a modified Hedley extraction and measured P concentration, <sup>33</sup>P recovery, and incorporation of <sup>18</sup>O from water into phosphate in soil pools. The recovery of <sup>33</sup>P in inorganic and organic soil P pools allowed measuring P exchange under DRW and control conditions. Furthermore, tracing the incorporation of O from enriched water into phosphate served as a proxy for biological P cycling and microbial activity in general (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). Indeed, while physicochemical processes have minimal effect on the oxygen stable isotope ratio in phosphate (&#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub>), enzymes do incorporate oxygen from soil water into phosphate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>). Changes in &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> (measured in per mil difference to Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water, VSMOW) and in O incorporation from water are thus an indicator of biological-driven P cycling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>). By conducting a relatively long incubation experiment on soils with different physical and mineralogical properties, we also contribute to further the knowledge on the effect of DRW on soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods" id="s2">
<title>Methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Soils and Sampling</title>
<p>Three soils were sampled on the Kohala climatic gradient in Hawaii, spanning a wide range in soil mineralogy, biological activity, and P availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>). The three soils are all from grassland sites and correspond to three climatic domains, arid (soil D1), sub-humid (soil D2), and humid domain (soil D3), where P cycling was analyzed under steady-state conditions in previous work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). Mean annual precipitation (MAP) on D1 is &#x0007E;275 mm, on D2 &#x0007E;1578 mm, and on D3 &#x0007E;3,123 mm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>). Going from arid to wet, primary minerals, e.g., apatite, are lost while amorphous secondary minerals and soil organic matter accumulate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>). With increasing rainfall, biological activity also increases, as reflected by microbial biomass, soil respiration, and potential phosphatase activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). Soil on D1 was previously classified as Clayey-skeletal, isotic, isohyperthermic Sodic Haplocambids or medial-skeletal, ferrihydritic, isohyperthermic Typic Haplotorrands, depending on the exact values of density, oxalate ex-tractable Fe and Al, and P sorption parameters; soil on D2 as medial, ferrihydritic, isothermic Andic Haplustolls or medial, amorphic, isomesic Humic Haplustands, depending on the expression of a Mollic epipedon and Andic properties; and soil on D3 as Medial, amorphic, isomesic Hydric Fulvudands and Alic Epiaquands, depending on subtle differences in landscape curvature [see (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>) for details]. In a 34-day soil incubation experiment at 60% max. water holding capacity, daily soil respiration increased 10-fold from 7.6 in D1 to 73.5 mg C g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> soil day<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in D3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). Phosphorus availability is lowest on the wettest site, where leaching drives P losses and P sorption capacity is highest (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>).</p>
<p>Soils were sampled in February 2016 and in February 2017 from the A horizon of the three sites. The soil samples were kept at room temperature during shipment to Switzerland (1 week) and then stored at &#x02212;20&#x000B0;C until the beginning of the experiment in February 2018. The combination of soil samples from two sampling dates was necessary to meet the soil dry mass requirements for the experiment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Analysis of Soil Properties</title>
<p>Soil pH was measured in water using a soil:solution ratio of 1:2.5 and a 24-h equilibration time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>). Total soil C and N were measured on an TC/EA (Temperature Conversion Elemental Analyzer; Vario Pyro Cube, Elementar, GmbH, Germany). To assess changes in soil mineralogy, Fe, Al and Si concentrations were measured in extracts of sodium pyrophosphate, oxalate ammonium, and dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>). In general, pyrophosphate tends to extract metals associated to organic matter; oxalate ammonium extracts metals associated to amorphous compounds such as allophane, imogolite and ferrihydrite; and dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate extracts metals from crystalline phases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>). All soil properties were measured with four replicates.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Drying-Rewetting Experiment</title>
<p>For both the <sup>33</sup>P and the <sup>18</sup>O experiments, soils were preincubated for 17 days at 60% maximum soil water holding capacity. Maximum water holding capacity was 0.62 g water g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> dry soil for D1, 1.18 for D2, and 3.36 for D3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). After preincubation, soil was divided into 30 g dry mass equivalent experimental units and labeled with isotopic tracer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). The <sup>33</sup>P experiment had four replicates, while the <sup>18</sup>O experiment had two replicates. Because of low resin-P concentrations in D3, more soil was needed to provide enough phosphate for purification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). At the same time, we wanted to preserve 30 g dry mass experimental units to make the results comparable between soils. To meet these requirements, in the <sup>18</sup>O experiment the D3 soil treatments were carried out with three experimental units in parallel. At each sampling time point, soils from the three sub-replicates were combined to make one replicate, yielding enough P for purification.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Diagram representing the experimental setup for one soil with a few of the sampling points as examples. Labeling was with carrier-free <sup>33</sup>P or <sup>18</sup>O-enriched water. Cycle length was kept constant for all three soils. Drying was tracked via mass loss and lids were closed as soon as 10% rel. soil moisture was reached, which was faster for D1 and D2 than D3. After 9 days all soils were rewetted to 60% rel. soil moisture.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-738464-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The experiment had two treatments: control, where soils were kept constantly moist at 60% max. water holding capacity, and DRW (drying-rewetting). Soils under DRW were wetted to a 60% max. water holding capacity and then subjected to drying until reaching 10% max. water holding capacity (corresponding &#x0007E; to 0.06, 0.12, and 0.34 g water g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> dry soil for D1, D2 and D3, respectively). At these water contents, the three soils were below their respective permanent wilting points (0.28, 0.75, 1.23 g water g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> dry soil for D1, D2, and D3, respectively; 37). The time to reach 10% max. water holding capacity was 9 days for D3, 4 days for D2 and 2 days for D1. To make results among the soils comparable, DRW cycles were standardized to 9 days for all soils. Once a soil reached 10% max. water holding capacity, a lid was placed on the container to prevent further drying until the start of the next cycle. After 9 days, the drying time of D3, all soils were rewetted. This was repeated for 10 cycles for the <sup>33</sup>P experiment and for 17 cycles for the <sup>18</sup>O experiment, giving an experiment duration of 90 and 153 days, respectively. Soils were sampled the day after rewetting. The <sup>33</sup>P experiment was shorter due to the relatively short half-life (25 days) of <sup>33</sup>P. Experimental units were arranged in a random complete block design in an incubation oven set at 27&#x000B0;C.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title><sup>33</sup>P Incorporation Into Inorganic and Organic P Pools</title>
<p>Phosphorus exchange was studied for control and drying-rewetting by labeling soil with <sup>33</sup>P as phosphoric acid (carrier free, meaning that the tracer added no measurable mass of P) and measuring the incorporation of radioisotope into different pools. Labeling amount (R) was 29.2 kBq g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> dry soil for D1, 43.7 kBq g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> for D2, and 59.9 kBq g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> for D3.</p>
<p>At each time point, a modified Hedley extraction was used to determine the concentration of P in each of the following operationally-defined inorganic and organic P pools: resin-P, microbial P, NaOH-Pi, NaOH-Po, and HCl-P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>). First, P was extracted with anion exchange membranes (BDH-551642S, VWR International) with or without 0.54 M 1-hexanol, the residue of the hexanol treatment was then extracted with 0.25 M NaOH and 0.05 M EDTA, and finally in 1 M HCl. The sorption-corrected difference between P extracted with hexanol and with resin only was taken as a proxy for microbial P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>). In each fraction, inorganic P was measured by the malachite green method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>). In the NaOH pool, the organic fraction (NaOH-Po) was determined by subtracting the inorganic fraction (NaOH-Pi) from the total P of the pool, determined after digestion with 2.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and 0.18 M K<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>8</sub> at 110&#x000B0;C for 60 min (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>). Because even after centrifugation soil residue contained significant amounts of solution, <sup>31</sup>P and <sup>33</sup>P carry over from the NaOH to the HCl extraction was corrected for using mass-balance.</p>
<p>The incorporation of radioisotope into P pools was determined by measuring the recovery of <sup>33</sup>P in each pool. Radioactivity in the extracted P pools was measured by liquid scintillation using a beta-emission counter (Tri-carb 2,500 TR, Packard Instruments, Meriden, CT, USA) after thoroughly mixing the samples with Ultima Gold or Ultima Gold AB for acid extracts. In a pre-test, three methods mentioned in the literature for separating radioactivity in organic and inorganic fractions of NaOH were evaluated: anion exchange resin-trap (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>), isobutanol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>), and acidification-centrifugation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>). Since acidification-centrifugation yielded the highest recovery of <sup>33</sup>P spike, this method was used in this experiment. Despite having higher recoveries than the other methods, there was still a considerable quenching effect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>), which was corrected for using soil-specific quenching factors calculated in the pre-experiment (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>).</p>
<p>For all pools, recovery of radioisotope [%] was calculated as,</p>
<disp-formula id="E1"><label>(1)</label><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable columnalign='left'><mml:mtr columnalign='left'><mml:mtd columnalign='left'><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy='false'>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x0002A;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where r(t) [Bq g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> soil] is the amount of radioactivity in the sample at time t and R is the total labeling amount, corrected for radioactive decay.</p>
<p>Specific activity sets recovery of isotope in relation to the P pool size and was calculated using Equation 2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>). The recovery of <sup>33</sup>P is divided by the label amount (r(t)/R) in order to account for soil specific labeling. This is because best-practice in radiosafety requires only using the minimum amount of radioactive label still giving a signal, which is dependent on soil P sorption properties. Hence, in this study, as in earlier work, SA has the units [% of <sup>33</sup>P (mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>] (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>).</p>
<disp-formula id="E2"><label>(2)</label><mml:math id="M2"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>Treatment impact on SA<sub>(t)</sub> of a pool was taken as an indicator for treatment effect on P exchange that pool. If specific activity changes faster under DRW than control treatment, this would imply that DRW accelerates cycling of P in that pool. For several replicates, specific activity could not be calculated due to either negative recovery or too small P pool size.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Incorporation of O From Water Into Phosphate</title>
<p>The effect of repeated DRW cycles on biologically driven P cycling was studied by tracing the incorporation of O from enriched water into phosphate for control and drying-rewetting treatments.</p>
<p>Soils from both treatments (control and DRW) were labeled with 0.6, 1.1, or 3.0 ml water per experimental unit with a &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub> of 387&#x02030; (labeling volume depended on soil water holding capacity). The labeled water was prepared by diluting 98 atom % <sup>18</sup>O (Sercon Limited, UK) with double distilled water. The DRW treatment received additional labeled water (&#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub> of 52&#x02030;) with every rewetting. Soil water was sampled shortly before the first labeling and at every sampling time point, and the isotopic signature of water was measured after quantitatively extracting water with cryodistillation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">51</xref>).</p>
<p>Oxygen stable isotope ratios in phosphate were measured in the resin, hexanol, and HCl-extractable pools. The pools were extracted in the same way as for the <sup>33</sup>P experiment, just with larger soil amounts, to meet the phosphate needs for purification. Phosphate in the resin, hexanol and HCl extracts was purified to Ag<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">52</xref>), which was measured in three analytical replicates using a TC/EA (Vario Pyro Cube, Elementar GmbH) in pyrolysis mode, coupled in continuous flow to an isotopic ratio mass spectrometer (Isoprime 100, Elementar GmbH). Two benzoic acid standards (IAEA 601: &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup><italic>O</italic> = 23.1&#x02030;, IAEA 602 &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup><italic>O</italic> = 71.3&#x02030;), an internal Ag<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> standard (Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium, &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup><italic>O</italic> = 14.2&#x02030;), and in-house made standards were used for instrumental drift correction and calibration. The &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> of microbial P was determined by mass balance considering the pool concentrations. If the difference between &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> of resin-P and hexanol P was less than twice the standard deviation of the analytical replicates, then &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> of microbial P was set equal to &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> of hexanol P. In the HCl extraction, we controlled for inorganic hydrolysis of the P-O bond in phosphate or any organic phosphate compound carried over from previous steps by using <sup>18</sup>O-labeled and unlabeled HCl extractants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">52</xref>). Since there was no systematic difference between the two splits, data did not need to be corrected.</p>
<p>Even though the experiment was conceived to have enough phosphate yield for purification, resin-P concentrations decreased throughout the course of the experiment, so that for later time points phosphate yield was too low to measure &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> for some experimental units. For three samples (D1 res B control t27; D2 res A control t27; D2 Res B DRW t27) we suspected organic matter contamination in the Ag<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>. Accordingly, these samples were cleaned with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> prior to analysis.</p>
<p>We compared the change in <sup>18</sup>O in phosphate that we measured with the change in <sup>18</sup>O in water to determine the relative exchange of oxygen in phosphate (Equation 3).</p>
<disp-formula id="E3"><label>(3)</label><mml:math id="M3"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>%</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003B4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x003B4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003B4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x003B4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x0002A;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>Where <italic>f</italic> is the value at the time of sampling and <italic>i</italic> is the value at the beginning of the experiment (before labeling). Since only biological processes affect O incorporation into phosphate, the higher the % of O exchanged in phosphate, the higher the proportion of biologically mediated P cycling. If treatment affected % of O exchanged between water and phosphate, this would suggest that there was a treatment effect on biological P cycling. While it is more common to interpret &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> relative to a theoretical equilibrium of the isotopic composition of O in phosphate with O in water (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">53</xref>), this approach was not deemed appropriate for this experiment where soil water was constantly changing due to drying-rewetting. While the isotopic signature of soil water was only measured during sampling (shortly after re-wetting), the changes in &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O in water during drying is predicted from earlier work on the same soils (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">54</xref>)). Measuring % of O exchanged in phosphate allowed us to compare results from different soils, which because of different labeling amounts and drying times, had different O isotopic ratios in water.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Data Analysis</title>
<p>Since different soils had different drying times, the three soils were statistically treated as separate experiments. For each soil, significance of differences in P concentrations, <sup>33</sup>P recovery, specific activities, pH, total C and N, and extractable metals was tested using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey&#x00027;s Honest Significant Difference Test (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">55</xref>). One-way ANOVA was used since sampling was destructive. For each linear model, we carefully performed model diagnostics by visually examining residuals vs. fitted values to test the assumption that the expected error = 0, normal q-q plot to test the assumption of normality, scale-location plot to test homoscedasticity (equal variance) and constant leverage to test the effect of potential outliers. All statistical tests were conducted at the significance level <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Effect of Drying-Rewetting on General Soil Properties</title>
<p>Soil property response to repeated drying-rewetting differed by soil type. The largest pH effect was observed in D3, the soil from the most humid site on the climatic gradient, where pH increased from 4.56 to 5.30 in the control, while it dropped to 3.94 under DRW (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Carbon concentration in the soil tended to decrease for both treatments compared to t0, though this effect was not statistically significant. Pyrophosphate-extractable Al, Fe, and Si tended to be higher in DRW than control for D1, though this too was not significant. There was no significant effect of DRW on pyrophosphate-extractable metals in D2. In D3, pyrophosphate-extractable Fe and Si were lower under DRW. Oxalate-extractable Al responded differently for the different soils. While in D1 DRW increased oxalate-extractable Al, it decreased in D2 and tended to decrease in D3. There were no significant differences in oxalate-extractable Fe, dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate (DCB)-extractable Al, and DCB-extractable Fe between DRW and control for any soil. However, there was a trend to lower DCB-extractable Si in D1 and significantly lower DCB-extractable Si under DRW for D3.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Initial (day 0) and final (154) soil properties of the D1, D2, and D3 soils.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2"><bold>Units</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Day 0</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Day 154</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Day 0</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Day 154</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Day 0</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Day 154</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>D1</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>D1 control</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>D1 DRW</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>D2</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>D2 control</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>D2 DRW</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>D3</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>D3 control</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>D3 DRW</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pH<sub>H2O</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.75<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.63<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.78<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.05<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.11<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.18<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.56<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.30<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.94<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">246<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">240<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">240<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">total P</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5,938</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">nd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">nd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,671</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">nd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">nd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3,932</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">nd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">nd</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M4"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Al</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M5"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.8<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M6"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Si</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M7"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Al</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.8<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.9<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.8<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.8<sup>ab</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M8"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.9<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M9"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Si</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.6<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M10"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Al</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.8<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M11"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M12"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Si</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Each value is the mean of four replicates. D1 stems from the arid end of the climate gradient, D2 from the subhumid site, and D3 from the most humid site. Control = incubated at 60% max. water holding capacity, DRW, drying-rewetting treatment; Nd, not determined. Different letters indicate significant differences between day 0, control and DRW of a given soil (one-way ANOVA, p &#x0003C; 0.05)</italic>.</p>
<fn id="TN1"><label>a</label><p><italic>extracted with pyrophosphate</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN2"><label>b</label><p><italic>extracted with oxalate ammonium</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN3"><label>c</label><p><italic>extracted with dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title><sup>33</sup>P Incorporation Into Inorganic and Organic P Pools</title>
<p>Concentrations of P in the resin pool were highest in D1 and lowest in D3. Concentrations of resin-P decreased for all soils during the course of the experiment, though only significantly for D2 and D3 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). Recovery of <sup>33</sup>P and specific activity of the resin pool decreased significantly with time for all soil and treatment combinations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2C,E</xref>). Despite large differences in pool sizes between the different soils, specific activity of resin-P in all soils was similar, &#x0007E;0.10&#x02013;0.17 % (mg P kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> 90 days after labeling. DRW treatment significantly affected specific activity for both D1 and D2 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). While specific activity of resin-P decreased in D1 compared to the control, for D2 (and D3, though not significant), DRW led to an increase.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>ANOVA results for P concentration, <sup>33</sup>P recovery, and specific activity (SA) in the resin and microbial pools.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="6" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>resin</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="6" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>microbial</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>conc</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><sup><bold><bold>33</bold></bold></sup><bold>P rec</bold>.</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>SA</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>conc</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><sup><bold><bold>33</bold></bold></sup><bold>P rec</bold>.</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>SA</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>df</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="14" style="background-color:#bcbdc0"><bold>D1 (SOIL FROM ARID SITE)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Block</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatment</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>13.3</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>8.8</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>6.1</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.03</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>67.5</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>47.6</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatment x time</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Error &#x003B3;</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">13</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="14" style="background-color:#bcbdc0"><bold>D2 (SOIL FROM SUBHUMID SITE)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Block</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>3.3</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.05</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.29</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatment</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>18.8</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>33.1</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>7.7</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.01</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>18.3</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>78.6</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>63.0</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.48</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatment x time</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>8.5</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.10</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Error &#x003B3;</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="14" style="background-color:#bcbdc0"><bold>D3 (SOIL FROM HUMID SITE)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Block</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatment</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>5.7</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.03</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>47.1</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>62.1</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>20.7</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>7.3</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatment x time</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Error &#x003B3;</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">13</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">11</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Significant effects are in bold lettering. For microbial P of D1 and D2, ANOVA was not performed on specific activity because many concentrations and <sup>33</sup>P recovery values were negative</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Concentration <bold>(A,B)</bold>, radioisotope recovery <bold>(C,D)</bold>, and specific activity <bold>(E,F)</bold> in resin-extractable (left) and microbial P (right). D1 refers to soil from the arid site, D2 from the subhumid site, and D3 from the humid site of the climatic gradient. Error bars show standard errors of the mean (<italic>n</italic> = 4).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-738464-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Concentration of microbial P was highest in D3 and decreased under DRW compared to control treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). Microbial P concentration in D1 and D2 DRW treatment at later time points was not significantly different from 0. Recovery of <sup>33</sup>P in microbial P also decreased with time, hence specific activity did not show significant treatment or time effects (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2D</xref>). While specific activity in microbial P displayed high variability, in general specific activity was in a similar order of magnitude as that of resin-P (0.10&#x02013;0.20 % (mg P kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. For D2 there was a significant time &#x000D7; treatment interaction effect on specific activity because under DRW microbial P decreased while under the control it stayed constant or increased slightly.</p>
<p>Concentrations of NaOH-Pi were &#x0007E;2000 mg P kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> for D1 and D2 and &#x0007E;500 mg P kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> for D3. Overall, NaOH-Pi showed no clear trend with time or treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3A,D,G</xref>). For all time points, NaOH-Pi was the main sink of <sup>33</sup>P in D1 and D2, with 50&#x02013;65% of added <sup>33</sup>P recovered in this pool. Recovery of <sup>33</sup>P in NaOH-Pi of D3 was lower, &#x0007E;20&#x02013;25%. Despite high recovery, specific activity was lower than for resin or microbial pools, at &#x0007E;0.03&#x02013;0.05% (mg P kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. Specific activity was not significantly affected by treatment or time for any soils (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Concentration <bold>(A&#x02013;C)</bold>, radioisotope recovery <bold>(D&#x02013;F)</bold>, and specific activity <bold>(G&#x02013;I)</bold> in NaOH-Pi (left), NaOH-Po (middle) and HCl-P (right). D1 refers to soil from the arid site, D2 from the subhumid site, and D3 from the humid site of the climatic gradient. Error bars show standard errors of the mean (<italic>n</italic> = 4).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-738464-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>ANOVA results for P concentration, <sup>33</sup>P recovery, and specific activity (SA) in the NaOH-Pi, NaOH-Po and HCl pools.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="6" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>NaOH-Pi</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="6" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>NaOH-Po</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="6" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>HCl</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>conc</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><sup><bold><bold>33</bold></bold></sup><bold>P rec</bold>.</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>SA</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>conc</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><sup><bold><bold>33</bold></bold></sup><bold>P rec</bold>.</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>SA</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>conc</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><sup><bold><bold>33</bold></bold></sup><bold>P rec</bold>.</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>SA</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>df</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>F</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="20" style="background-color:#bcbdc0"><bold>D1 (SOIL FROM ARID SITE)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Block</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.98</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatment</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>5.6</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.03</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>8.1</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.87</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>54.8</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>10.3</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>6.2</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.01</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatment x time</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>3.8</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.05</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.40</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.72</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Error &#x003B3;</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="20" style="background-color:#bcbdc0"><bold>D2 (SOIL FROM SUBHUMID SITE)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Block</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.78</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatment</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>8.7</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C; 0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.21</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>13.4</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C; 0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>9.53</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C; 0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.35</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>63.0</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C; 0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>20.1</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C; 0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>34.0</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C; 0.01</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatment x time</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>4.2</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.04</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Error &#x003B3;</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">12</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="20" style="background-color:#bcbdc0"><bold>D3 (SOIL FROM HUMID SITE)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Block</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatment</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>14.1</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>10.1</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>5.3</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.04</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>4.8</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.03</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>17.6</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>16.8</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.01</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treatment x time</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Error &#x003B3;</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Significant effects are in bold lettering. For NaOH-Po of D1 and D2, ANOVA was not performed on specific activity because many concentrations and <sup>33</sup>P recovery values were negative</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Concentrations of NaOH-Po were higher in D2 and D3 than in D1. Concentration of NaOH-Po was significantly affected by time in D1 and D2 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). However, there was no consistent decrease or increase of NaOH-Po concentration with time in any of the soils (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). Recovery of <sup>33</sup>P in the NaOH-Po pool displayed high variability between replicates, but in general was low (&#x0003C;6 %) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3E</xref>). Though also displaying high uncertainty, specific activity of NaOH-Po in D2 and D3 tended to increase with increasing time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3H</xref>). For D3, specific activity of NaOH-Po was the lowest for all pools measured [&#x0007E;0.01 % (mg P kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>].</p>
<p>Concentration of HCl-P was &#x0007E;2000 mg P kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> for D1 and &#x0007E;500 mg P kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> for D2 and D3 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3C</xref>). These concentrations were significantly affected by time in D1 and D2 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). However, like for NaOH-Pi and Po, there was no consistent decrease or increase of concentration observed with time. Recovery of <sup>33</sup>P in HCl-P was low (&#x0003C;5%) in D1 and D2, but considerably higher in D3 (15&#x02013;30%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3F</xref>). Specific activity of HCl-P increased with increasing incubation duration for all soils (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3I</xref>). For D1, specific activity in HCl-P had the lowest specific activity of any pool [&#x0003C;0.02 % (mg P kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>].</p>
<p>Total recovery of <sup>33</sup>P in D1 ranged from 73&#x02013;86%, in D2 from 67&#x02013;75%, and in D3 from 53&#x02013;70%.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Incorporation of O From Water Into Phosphate</title>
<p>Stable oxygen isotopic value in soil water (&#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub>) increased from &#x02212;1 to &#x02212;6&#x02030; prior to labeling to &#x0002B;9&#x02013;&#x0002B;15&#x02030; in the control treatment and to &#x0002B;44&#x02013;&#x0002B;54&#x02030; in the DRW treatment (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 2</xref>). Water in the DRW treatment was heavier because of evaporation during the drying phase and because this treatment was continuously rewetted with <sup>18</sup>O-enriched water.</p>
<p>&#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> values of all treatments and soil combinations in all three analyzed pools increased with time. The &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> in resin-P increased from &#x0007E;20 to 30&#x02030; for all soils and treatments (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 2</xref>). The &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> in microbial-P showed a similar pattern to resin-P for D1 and D2 soils. In D3, &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> in microbial-P in the control treatment tended to be below &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> in resin-P. &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> of the HCl pool increased during the course of the experiment. After 153 days of incubation, &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> in D1 had increased by about 4&#x02030;, D2 by &#x0007E;6&#x02030;, and D3 by &#x0007E;5&#x02013;7&#x02030;. As for resin and microbial &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub>, there was no clear treatment effect on &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> in all three analyzed pools.</p>
<p>Despite having similar &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> values, the amount of O exchanged between water and phosphate was higher in the control relative to DRW treatment. Since water in the DRW treatment was heavier, the same &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> value implies less actual exchange of O in phosphate (Equation 3). In resin-P, up to 50 % of O in phosphate was exchanged in the control treatment, compared to &#x0007E;20% in DRW (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>, left). A similar pattern was observed in the microbial-P pool, where the highest exchange was observed in the control treatment of D2 (85%). However, in D3 the proportion of O exchanged in phosphate in the microbial pool did not differ significantly between treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>, right). Finally, in the HCl pool, the relative proportion of O exchanged in phosphate was &#x0007E;35-70% lower in the DRW treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>), with the clearest difference between control and DRW in D1.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Biologically-mediated oxygen exchange in the resin-P (left) and microbial P pools (right). <bold>(A, B)</bold> show results from soil D1 (arid site); <bold>(C,D)</bold> show results from soil D2 (subhumid site); and <bold>(E,F)</bold> show results from soil D3 (humid site). Exchange was calculated as the change in &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> of the pool divided by the change in &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub>. Error bars are standard errors of the mean (<italic>n</italic> = 2). Oxygen exchange in microbial P of D2 at <italic>t</italic> = 27 days <bold>(D)</bold> is not plotted since it was &#x0003E;&#x0003E; 100%, suggesting a measurement error.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-738464-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>Biologically-mediated oxygen exchange in phosphate in the HCl-P pool. Exchange was measured after 153 days of incubation and calculated as the change in &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>P</sub> of the pool divided by the change in &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub>. D1 refers to soil from the arid site, D2 from the subhumid site, and D3 from the humid site of the climatic gradient.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-738464-g0005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The results suggest that soil physicochemical properties responded differently to DRW based on the climatic history of these soils (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). However, across all soils, DRW seemed to accelerate inorganic P exchange between more recalcitrant pools (HCl-P) and the soil solution. On the other hand, repeated DRW led to reduced O incorporation into resin-P, microbial-P and HCl-P. While several studies have traced <sup>33</sup>P incorporation into sequentially-extracted P pools (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">57</xref>), it has not previously been done under DRW conditions. Also, P radioisotope tracing has rarely been combined with <sup>18</sup>O tracing in phosphate in soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). By comparing specific activity (% <sup>33</sup>P recovery/pool concentration, Equation 2) between control and DRW treatments, it was possible to determine that DRW either accelerates or hampers P exchange, depending on the pool and soil studied. The findings provide several new insights on soil P dynamics and implications for soil P research and modeling.</p>
<sec>
<title>Insights on Soil Phosphorus Dynamics</title>
<p>Recently the sequential extraction method, which is widespread in P research and the basis of most P modeling frameworks, has come under increasing scrutiny (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">58</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">60</xref>). As a consequence, spectroscopic methods are becoming more widely used as an alternative and as a way to validate extraction procedures. The soils used in this study have already been characterized with spectroscopic approaches and the link between the sequentially extracted pools and the soil composition validated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>). An important validation component is to test the mobility assumptions inherent in sequential extractions, to better understand the dynamics of each pool. Here we trace isotope incorporation into sequentially-extracted pools to better understand P dynamics. Our study confirms earlier findings that NaOH-Pi is the main sink of radioisotope label in the time frame of days-months covered by incubation experiments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">57</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">61</xref>). However, unlike in previous studies, where recovery of <sup>33</sup>P in NaOH-Pi continued to increase even after 34 days of incubation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">61</xref>), in our study specific activity of NaOH-Pi remained more or less constant through the course of the experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3G</xref>). The specific activity measured in NaOH-Pi was very close to a theoretical equilibrium specific activity. A common assumption in isotope exchange kinetics is that after enough time has passed, the radioisotope will be distributed equally among all the soil P pools in proportions relative to the pool size (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">62</xref>). Accordingly, the specific activity of any pool in this equilibrium state (<italic>SA</italic><sub><italic>eq</italic></sub>) would be (Equation 4),</p>
<disp-formula id="E4"><label>(4)</label><mml:math id="M13"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy='false'>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x02217;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>Where <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>sum</italic></sub> is the total amount of P involved in exchange processes (the sum of exchanging P pools). If we take <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>sum</italic></sub> to be the sum of sequentially extracted inorganic and organic P pools, <italic>SA</italic><sub><italic>eq</italic></sub> equals 0.024 &#x000B1; 0.001 for D1, 0.027 &#x000B1; 0.001 for D2, and 0.046 &#x000B1; 0.002 % (mg P kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> for D3. Our calculated theoretical <italic>SA</italic><sub><italic>eq</italic></sub> closely matched the observed specific activity of the NaOH-Pi pools (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>), suggesting those pools were already in equilibrium at the first sampling (9 days). Hence, analysis of specific activity in NaOH-Pi showed that this pool is more dynamic in soils rich in chemically sorptive components such as amorphous minerals than in other soils investigated in earlier studies, where recovery of <sup>33</sup>P in NaOH-Pi did not plateau.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p>Specific activities of resin-P, NaOH-Pi, NaOH-Po, and HCl pools under control (left) and DRW (right) treatment. <bold>(A,B)</bold> show results from soil D1 (arid site); <bold>(C,D)</bold> show results from soil D2 (subhumid site); and <bold>(E,F)</bold> show results from soil D3 (humid site). Lines are the regression lines fit to specific activities of each pool. The dashed line represents the specific activity expected in equilibrium (SA<sub>eq</sub>). Specific activity has the units % of <sup>33</sup>P (mg P kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. Error bars show standard errors of the mean (<italic>n</italic> = 4).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-01-738464-g0006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The fact that NaOH-Pi reached equilibrium before resin-P does not mean that NaOH-Pi turns over faster than the much smaller resin pool. Rather, resin-P, being the fastest to exchange with the pool that is labeled (the soil solution), has the highest specific activity at the beginning of the experiment. This shows the fast exchange of this pool, as resin-P very quickly goes into isotopic equilibrium with phosphate in soil solution, before exchanges with other P pools take place (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">63</xref>). Previous observations have shown that specific activity of resin-P continues to decline during the experiment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>), and our rudimentary extrapolations suggest specific activity of resin-P continues to decline until the radioisotope is equally distributed in the whole system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). Our observations suggest that for less labile pools (such as NaOH-Pi), specific activity increases with increasing exchange reactions, and dynamics can only be followed until specific activity reaches <italic>SA</italic><sub><italic>eq</italic></sub>, after which time influx can no longer be differentiated from outflux. The concept of <italic>SA</italic><sub><italic>eq</italic></sub> may be interesting to study P dynamics in future radioisotope tracing experiments. For example, if more points were measured and for a longer period, one might be able to extrapolate an equilibration time of P in the system with some confidence and determine how this differs between different soils and/or treatments. However, for longer experimental durations significantly higher labeling doses would be required.</p>
<p>Mean residence time of P in HCl-P has been approximated to be on the order of years to millennia, depending on soil pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). Our results confirm the low reactivity of this pool, especially in D1, which has higher pH and is known to contain apatite (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>). However, in D3 specific activity of NaOH-Pi and HCl-P were similar, suggesting that these two pools are chemically more similar for high-organic matter, acidic soils. This may be explained by the redistribution of P from the NaOH-extraction and dissolution of Fe- and Al oxides by 1 M HCl (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">64</xref>). Over all three soils, 7&#x02013;38% of O in phosphate of the HCl-P pool was incorporated from water during the 5-month experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). Phosphate enters the HCl pool without cleavage of the P-O bond and therefore an increase in O incorporation can only occur through abiotic exchange with biologically cycled resin-P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">65</xref>). This confirms the <sup>33</sup>P results that HCl-P may contain both minerals that are inert on short time scales, such as apatite, and secondary P forms that are exchanging readily on the time-scale of months. Interpretation of the HCl-P fraction is complicated because depending on soil properties it can contain multiple forms of P, not just apatite (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">60</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition, our study provides information on exchange of P in organic P, which has rarely been tackled (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">66</xref>). We extracted organic P with 0.25 M NaOH and 0.05 M EDTA, the predominant method used for liquid <sup>31</sup>P NMR speciation of organic P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">67</xref>) and for stable oxygen isotope analysis of organic P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">68</xref>). Earlier work has shown that organic P in this pool is not readily-degradable by enzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">69</xref>). While there was large variability in the data within replicates and between time points, the order of magnitude of specific activity of NaOH-Po provides interesting qualitative insights into the dynamics and nature of this pool. In D2 and D3, the specific activity of NaOH-Po was the lowest of all measured pools, suggesting that the organic fraction of this pool is more inert than the inorganic pools studied (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). This confirms earlier <sup>33</sup>P tracing studies, where the specific activity of NaOH-Po was also very low, comparable to or lower than that of HCl-P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>). It is well known that organic matter is heavily stabilized due to organo-mineral reactions in Hawaiian soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">70</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">72</xref>). Even in the organic horizon of P-poor forest soil, specific activity of NaOH-Po was lower than that of HCl-P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>). This suggests extremely long mean residence time of P in NaOH-Po, likely in a range similar to HCl-P (years to millennia).</p>
<p>While studies on the limitations and opportunities of fractionation techniques have mostly focused on inorganic P forms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">58</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">60</xref>), much less is known about limitations of organic-P forms as determined by sequential fractionation. The fast exchange of the inorganic soil P pools (NaOH-Pi and HCl-P) compared to the relatively inert NaOH-Po pool suggests that physicochemical fluxes dominate soil P cycling and P availability in these soils. However, it is likely that some organic P fractions within the large NaOH-Po pool have a shorter mean residence time, but their dynamics are masked by the bulk of organic P, which is stabilized in organo-mineral complexes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">73</xref>). Analysis of organic P with NMR or stable oxygen isotopes in NaOH-Po extracts needs to consider the relatively inert nature of this pool to avoid drawing false conclusions about P availability and nutrition. The dynamics of P in other operationally-defined organic P pools (e.g., 0.5 M NaHCO<sub>3</sub>-extractable) or of single Po compounds need to be assessed to determine if there are meaningful substitutes to NaOH-Po for studying organic P cycling in soil.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Effect of Drying-Rewetting on Phosphorus Dynamics</title>
<p>Our results suggest that repeated DRW may reduce mean residence time of inorganic P in soil by accelerating physicochemical P exchange processes. A recent study on sandy soil tracing <sup>33</sup>P incorporation into water-extractable and microbial P reported reduced mean residence time of P in microbial-P under DRW as compared to control treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>). In our study, we complement these findings by investigating P dynamics in other inorganic P pools and analyzing O incorporation from water in phosphate. Our results show that specific activity was lower under DRW in resin-P of D2 and D3 soils, suggesting faster dilution of <sup>33</sup>P from resin-P into less mobile P pools (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2E</xref>). This may be because drying-rewetting disrupts aggregate structure, exposing new sites to exchange P with the soil solution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). Likewise, more <sup>33</sup>P tended to be recovered in the HCl-P pool, generally considered to be the least mobile inorganic pool, of DRW than control treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). As soil dries, ionic strength increases, and may lead to precipitation of phosphate with cations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">74</xref>). The DRW effect on specific activity of resin-P and HCl-P thus provides evidence that DRW may accelerate the exchange of inorganic soil P by repeatedly disturbing the soil chemical environment.</p>
<p>Unlike inorganic P, turnover of organic P was likely reduced by DRW, because DRW hampered biological P cycling. Pool size, <sup>33</sup>P recovery, and specific activity of NaOH-Po showed no significant treatment effect, due to high variability between replicates and time points (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). However, several indicators point to reduced biological P transformations. Firstly, soil microbial P decreased in DRW treatments, whereas it remained stable under control treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). This confirms earlier studies reporting the negative effect of DRW on soil microbial biomass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>) and slowing down of microbial P turnover (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>). <sup>33</sup>P recovery in microbial P followed the same pattern as concentration. Hence, the decrease in microbial P pool size resulted in a concomitant decrease in microbially-mediated P cycling.</p>
<p>Drying-rewetting also reduced the amount of O exchanged between water and phosphate, an effect observed in all three pools analyzed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). Although soils were below their permanent wilting point under dry conditions, microbes are expected to be active also at soil water potentials well below [&#x02212;5 mPa; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">75</xref>)], thus we expect some O exchange. Since we used the &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O of soil water after re-wetting as a reference to calculate exchange, our observation can be considered a conservative estimate. Under dry conditions, soil water may be up to 10&#x02030; higher (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>), which would translate to even lower calculated values of O exchanged between water and phosphate under the DRW treatment (Equation 3). The lower amount of oxygen exchanged in phosphate in DRW could either be due to decreased O incorporation associated to increased proportion of phosphate being released by mineralization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>) or to stress-induced inactivity of microbes. It has been shown that under P-limitation, microbes rely more heavily on organic P mineralization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">76</xref>), which would incorporate only one O atom. It has also been observed that under drought conditions, microbial metabolism requires higher quantities of C, which translates in higher production of extracellular enzymes targeting C compounds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">77</xref>). Although not targeting organic P, phosphate is often released as a by-product [i.e., 5&#x02032;-nucleotidase; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">78</xref>)] and would incorporate one O from water. In our experiment, DRW had lower O incorporation in all three soils, independent of their P and C availability. Rather, D1, which has the highest P and lowest C availability, respectively [Tables 1, 2, Figure 2A in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>)], had the largest reduction in O exchanged, and this soil also experienced the longest dry periods. Hence, the reduced O incorporation was likely caused by stress-induced inactivity or dormancy of a portion of the microbial biomass. When microbes are dormant, exchange with the soil solution is limited and intracellular processes, which could promote a complete exchange of O in phosphate, are reduced to a minimum (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">79</xref>).</p>
<p>D1 had a low water-holding capacity and thus a fast drying-time, 2 days compared to 4 and 9 days, of D2 and D3, respectively. Hence, treatment effect on O exchanged in phosphate might be the largest for D1 because the DRW soils dried out more quickly than D2 or D3. Interestingly, however, the long dry phase did not translate into a treatment effect on <sup>33</sup>P recovery in inorganic P pools (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Tables 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>), even though physicochemical exchange processes also need water. This may be because aggregate breakdown and changing soil mineralogy (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>), as discussed above, increased physicochemical fluxes shortly after rewetting to a point that this compensated for reduced exchange under the dry phase. Thus, the treatment effect on O exchanged in phosphate was less strong in D3 because these soils stayed moist longer. Furthermore, we found evidence for unanticipated anoxic conditions in D3 control treatment. While pH in the DRW treatment of D3 decreased from 4.6 to 3.9, under control treatment pH increased to 5.3 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The pH increase under the control treatment came along with a strong sulfur smell, suggesting that the sealed caps led to anoxic conditions and the reduction of Fe<sup>3&#x0002B;</sup> to Fe<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup>, consuming protons, and sulfate to hydrogen sulfide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">80</xref>). The unintended anoxic conditions likely resulted because high microbial activity of these soils consumed oxygen in the closed containers. The depletion of oxygen likely restricted biological activity in D3 and explains the smaller treatment effect on O-exchanged in phosphate in D3 compared to D2 and D1.</p>
<p>Another limitation of this study was the low <sup>33</sup>P recoveries in D3. While total <sup>33</sup>P recoveries of D1 and D2 were in the range of those reported in earlier work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>), recoveries of D3 were only 53&#x02013;70%. Buehler et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>) measured total recoveries of 68&#x02013;90% in Ferralsols from an agricultural field experiment, with lower recoveries on soils with low P availability. D3 had a considerably lower resin-P concentration than the other two studied soils (20 compared to 70 and 90 mg P kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), hence total recovery was also negatively related to P availability in our experiment. Part of the incomplete recovery may be due to color quenching or self-absorption of scintillations by soil particles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>), though this effect was at least partially accounted for with our quenching study for the NaOH-extraction (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>). However, low recovery may also be a sign that the modified Hedley extraction misses large P fractions in organic-matter rich, highly-weathered Andisols. Buehler et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>) found additional 0&#x02013;6% of added radioisotope label in the residual pool, which they extracted by digesting in concentrated H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> at 360&#x000B0;C under stepwise addition of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. It is possible that the residual P pool may also play an important role in P cycling even on a timescale of weeks to months for the soils studied and may have been a sink of <sup>33</sup>P in our experiment.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Repeated DRW increased exchange of inorganic P while reducing biological activity and biologically-mediated P cycling. The three studied soils from the Hawaiian climatic gradient displayed significant differences in P dynamics. Most noticeably, incorporation of <sup>33</sup>P into HCl-P was much faster on soils from the wettest site (20&#x02013;25% after 90 days) compared to soils from the most arid site (&#x0003C;5%) of the climatic gradient. This confirms that different inorganic P forms found in these soils lead to vastly different P dynamics. However, across all soils we observed that DRW led to faster dilution of radioisotopes from resin-P into HCl-P. Similarly, DRW reduced the amount of O that had been exchanged in phosphate from 20&#x02013;40 to 7&#x02013;20% for all soils, suggesting that DRW hampered biological P cycling independent of soil climatic history. The results thus confirm our first hypothesis that biological and physicochemical P cycling are differently affected by repeated DRW. However, the second hypothesis was rejected, since we could not find evidence that the effect of DRW is dependent on soil climatic history. Current model representations of the P cycle should thus be updated to account for opposing effects of DRW on biological vs. physicochemical fluxes to P availability.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>JH wrote the manuscript with inputs from all co-authors. JH, EF, CP, OC, PV, and FT contributed to the experimental design. JH and FT conducted the experiments and performed the analysis. All authors contributed to the manuscript and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Project number 200021_162422).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s9">
<title>Publisher&#x00027;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack><p>We are grateful to lab help by Dr. Laurie Sch&#x000F6;nholzer, Monika Macsai, Camille Rubeaud, Maja Siegenthaler, and Dr. Josep Ramoneda; help with statistics and experimental design by Lilian Gasser, Andreas Psimopoulus, and Nina Roth; and fruitful discussions with Dr. Eva M&#x000E9;sz&#x000E1;ros, Dr. Klaus Jarosch, Dr. Hao Chen, and Dr. Astrid Oberson. We would also like to acknowledge Prof. Stefano Bernasconi for providing access to IRMS for measuring water samples, and Dr. Matthias Saurer and Dr. Roland Werner for use of the cryo-distillation setup in their lab.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s10">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoil.2021.738464/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoil.2021.738464/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goll</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vuichard</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maignan</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jornet-Puig</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sardans</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Violette</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>A representation of the phosphorus cycle for ORCHIDEE (revision 4520)</article-title>. <source>Geosci Model Dev.</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>3745</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>70</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-10-3745-2017</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zanchi</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akselsson</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallander</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Belyazid</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Modeling the forest phosphorus nutrition in a southwestern Swedish forest site</article-title>. <source>Ecol Modell.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>369</volume>:<fpage>88</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>100</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.018</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goll</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ciais</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guenet</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Helfenstein</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Global evaluation of nutrient enabled version land surface model ORCHIDEE-CNP v1.2 (r5986)</article-title>. <source>Geosci. Model Dev.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>65</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-2020-93-supplement</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haygarth</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Biogeochemistry: phosphorus solubilization in rewetted soils</article-title>. <source>Nature.</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>411</volume>:<fpage>258</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/35077146</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11357117</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carpenter</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caraco</surname> <given-names>NF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Correll</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Howarth</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharpley</surname> <given-names>AN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>VH</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen</article-title>. <source>Ecol Appl.</source> (<year>1998</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>559</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>68</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/1051-0761</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reed</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thornton</surname> <given-names>PE</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Incorporating phosphorus cycling into global modeling efforts: a worthwhile, tractable endeavor</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>208</volume>:<fpage>324</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13521</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26115197</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ockenden</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hollaway</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beven</surname> <given-names>KJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Collins</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Falloon</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Major agricultural changes required to mitigate phosphorus losses under climate change</article-title>. <source>Nat Commun.</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>161</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-017-00232-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28757602</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oberson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joner</surname> <given-names>EJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Microbial turnover of phosphorus in soil</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baldwin</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Organic Phosphorus in the Environment</source>. <publisher-loc>Wallingford, CT</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CAB International</publisher-name> (<year>2005</year>). p. <fpage>133</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>64</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Helfenstein</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jegminat</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>McLaren</surname> <given-names>TI</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Soil solution phosphorus turnover: derivation, interpretation, and insights from a global compilation of isotope exchange kinetic studies</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>105</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-15-105-2018</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Helfenstein</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pistocchi</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oberson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamburini</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goll</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Estimates of mean residence times of phosphorus in commonly-considered inorganic soil phosphorus pools</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>441</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>54</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-17-441-2020</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Denef</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Six</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Merckx</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paustian</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Short-term effects of biological and physical forces on aggregate formation in soils with different clay mineralogy</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil.</source> (<year>2002</year>) <volume>246</volume>:<fpage>185</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>200</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1020668013524</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sinaj</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fardeau</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Isotopically exchangeable phosphate in size fractionated and unfractionated soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc Am J</source>. (<year>1997</year>) <volume>61</volume>:<fpage>1413</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100050019x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>B&#x000FC;nemann</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keller</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoop</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jud</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boivin</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Increased availability of phosphorus after drying and rewetting of a grassland soil: processes and plant use</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil.</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>370</volume>:<fpage>511</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>26</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-013-1651-y</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olsen</surname> <given-names>RG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Court</surname> <given-names>MN</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effect of wetting and drying of soils on phosphate adsorption and resin extraction of soil phosphate</article-title>. <source>J Soil Sci.</source> (<year>1982</year>) <volume>33</volume>:<fpage>709</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>17</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01801.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>OA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rancourt</surname> <given-names>DG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chorover</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Iron-oxide crystallinity increases during soil redox oscillations</article-title>. <source>Geochim Cosmochim Acta.</source> (<year>2006</year>) <volume>70</volume>:<fpage>1710</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>27</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2005.12.005</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Driessen</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haygarth</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name> <name><surname>McKelvie</surname> <given-names>ID</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Potential contribution of lysed bacterial cells to phosphorus solubilisation in two rewetted Australian pasture soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>2003</year>) <volume>35</volume>:<fpage>187</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00244-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dinh</surname> <given-names>M-V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guhr</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spohn</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matzner</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Release of phosphorus from soil bacterial and fungal biomass following drying/rewetting</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>110</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.02.014</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schimel</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effects of drying&#x02013;rewetting frequency on soil carbon and nitrogen transformations</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>2002</year>) <volume>34</volume>:<fpage>777</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>87</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00007-X</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bapiri</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x000E5;&#x000E5;th</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rousk</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Drying&#x02013;rewetting cycles affect fungal and bacterial growth differently in an arable soil</article-title>. <source>Microb Ecol.</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>60</volume>:<fpage>419</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>28</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-010-9723-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20635180</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Najera</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dippold</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boy</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seguel</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koester</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stock</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Effects of drying/rewetting on soil aggregate dynamics and implications for organic matter turnover</article-title>. <source>Biol Fertil Soils.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>56</volume>:<fpage>893</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>905</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-020-01469-6</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gordon</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haygarth</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bardgett</surname> <given-names>RD</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Drying and rewetting effects on soil microbial community composition and nutrient leaching</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>2008</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>302</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.08.008</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chepkwony</surname> <given-names>CK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haynes</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swift</surname> <given-names>RS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harrison</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Mineralization of soil organic P induced by drying and rewetting as a source of plant-available P in limed and unlimed samples of an acid soil</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil.</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>234</volume>:<fpage>83</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>90</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1010541000437</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Butterly</surname> <given-names>CR</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x000FC;nemann</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names></name> <name><surname>McNeill</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baldock</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marschner</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Carbon pulses but not phosphorus pulses are related to decreases in microbial biomass during repeated drying and rewetting of soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>41</volume>:<fpage>1406</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.018</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Soil microbial biomass carbon and phosphorus as affected by frequent drying&#x02013;rewetting</article-title>. <source>Soil Res.</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>54</volume>:<fpage>321</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/SR14299</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jarosch</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meszaros</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oberson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Repeated drying and rewetting differently affect abiotic and biotic soil phosphorus (P) dynamics in a sandy soil: a 33P soil incubation study</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>2021</year>) <fpage>153</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108079</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>OA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Pedogenic thresholds and soil process domains in basalt-derived soils</article-title>. <source>Ecosystems.</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>1379</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>95</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10021-013-9690-z</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Helfenstein</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamburini</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>von Sperber</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Massey</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pistocchi</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>OA</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Combining spectroscopic and isotopic techniques gives a dynamic view of phosphorus cycling in soil</article-title>. <source>Nat Commun.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>3226</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-05731-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30104647</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vogel</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Helfenstein</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Massey</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sekine</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kretzschmar</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beiping</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Microspectroscopy reveals dust-derived apatite grains in acidic, highly-weathered Hawaiian soils</article-title>. <source>Geoderma.</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>381</volume>:<fpage>114681</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114681</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bauke</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names></name> <name><surname>von Sperber</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Siebers</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamburini</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amelung</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Biopore effects on phosphorus biogeochemistry in subsoils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>111</volume>:<fpage>157</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>65</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.04.012</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pistocchi</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x000E9;sz&#x000E1;ros</surname> <given-names>&#x000C9;</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x000FC;nemann</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamburini</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>In or Out of Equilibrium? How Microbial Activity Controls the Oxygen Isotopic Composition of Phosphate in Forest Organic Horizons With Low and High Phosphorus Availability</article-title>. <source>Front Environ Sci.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2020.564778</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Siegenthaler</surname> <given-names>MB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamburini</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pistocchi</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>A dual isotopic (32P and 18O) incubation study to disentangle mechanisms controlling phosphorus cycling in soils from a climatic gradient (Kohala, Hawaii)</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>149</volume>:<fpage>107920</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107920</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x00027;Neil</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Surkov</surname> <given-names>AV</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Biogeochemical cycling of phosphorus: Insights from oxygen isotope effects of phosphoenzymes</article-title>. <source>Am J Sci.</source> (<year>2005</year>) <volume>305</volume>:<fpage>596</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>620</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2475/ajs.305.6-8.596</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jaisi</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kukkadapu</surname> <given-names>RK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Fractionation of oxygen isotopes in phosphate during its interactions with iron oxides</article-title>. <source>Geochim Cosmochim Acta.</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>74</volume>:<fpage>1309</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>19</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2009.11.010</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gross</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Angert</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>What processes control the oxygen isotopes of soil bio-available phosphate?</article-title> <source>Geochim Cosmochim Acta.</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>159</volume>:<fpage>100</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2015.03.023</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tamburini</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pfahler</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>von Sperber</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernasconi</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Oxygen isotopes for unraveling phosphorus transformations in the soil&#x02013;plant system: a review</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc Am J</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>78</volume>:<fpage>38</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj2013.05.0186dgs</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Giambelluca</surname> <given-names>TW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frazier</surname> <given-names>AG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y-L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>P-S</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Online rainfall atlas of Hawai&#x02018;i</article-title>. <source>Bull Am Meteorol Soc.</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>94</volume>:<fpage>313</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00228.1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>OA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gavenda</surname> <given-names>RT</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>EF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ziegler</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olson</surname> <given-names>CG</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>The impact of climate on the biogeochemical functioning of volcanic soils</article-title>. <source>Chem Geol.</source> (<year>2003</year>) <volume>202</volume>:<fpage>195</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>223</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2002.09.001</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>FAL RAC FAW</collab></person-group>. <source>&#x0201C;pH-Wert in Wassersuspension (1:2.5) and pH-Wert in CaCl2-Suspension (1:2.5),&#x0201D; in Schweizerische Referenzmethoden der Eidgen&#x000F6;ssischen landwirtschaftlichen Forschungsanstalten [Agroscope Z&#x000FC;rich, Changins, W&#x000E4;denswil: Forschungsanstalt f&#x000FC;r Agrar&#x000F6;kologie und Landbau (FAL), Recherche Agronomique Changins</source> (RAC), Forschungsanstalt W&#x000E4;denswil (FAW)] (<year>1996</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pansu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gautheyrou</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Mineralogical Separation by Selective Dissolution</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Pansu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gautheyrou</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Handbook of Soil Analysis: Mineralogical, Organic Inorganic Methods</source>. <publisher-loc>Berlin</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name> (<year>2006</year>). p. <fpage>167</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>219</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parfitt</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Childs</surname> <given-names>CW</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Estimation of forms of Fe and Al: a review, and analysis of contrasting soils by dissolution and moessbauer methods</article-title>. <source>Soil Res.</source> (<year>1988</year>) <volume>26</volume>:<fpage>121</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>44</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/SR9880121</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kouno</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tuchiya</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ando</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Measurement of soil microbial biomass phosphorus by an anion exchange membrane method</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>1995</year>) <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>1353</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(95)00057-L</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>B&#x000FC;nemann</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oberson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liebisch</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keller</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Annaheim</surname> <given-names>KE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huguenin-Elie</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Rapid microbial phosphorus immobilization dominates gross phosphorus fluxes in a grassland soil with low inorganic phosphorus availability</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>51</volume>:<fpage>84</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>95</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.012</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ohno</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zibilske</surname> <given-names>LM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Determination of low concentrations of phosphorus in soil extracts using malachite green</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc Am J</source>. (<year>1991</year>) <volume>55</volume>:<fpage>892</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>895</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500030046x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bowman</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A sequential extraction procedure with concentrated sulfuric acid and dilute base for soil organic phosphorus</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc Am J.</source> (<year>1989</year>) <volume>53</volume>:<fpage>362</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300020008x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>B&#x000FC;nemann</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Steinebrunner</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smithson</surname> <given-names>PC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oberson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phosphorus dynamics in a highly weathered soil as revealed by isotopic labeling techniques</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc Am J</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>68</volume>:<fpage>1645</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>55</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj2004.1645</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jayachandran</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hetrick</surname> <given-names>BAD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwab</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Partitioning dissolved inorganic and organic phosphorus using acidified molybdate and isobutanol</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc Am J</source>. (<year>1992</year>) <volume>56</volume>:<fpage>762</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030014x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>47.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moir</surname> <given-names>JO</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tiessen</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Characterization of available P by sequential extraction</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Carter</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Soil Sampling Methods of Analysis</source>. <publisher-loc>Boca Raton, FL</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CRC Press</publisher-name> (<year>1993</year>). p. <fpage>293</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>306</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<label>48.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gibson</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Modern techniques for measuring the quenching correction in a liquid scintillation counter: a critical review</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>C-T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Horrocks</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alpen</surname> <given-names>LE</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Liquid Scintillation Counting, Recent Applications Development.</source> <publisher-loc>San Francisco</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name> (<year>1980</year>). p. <fpage>153</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>172</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<label>49.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Randriamanantsoa</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oberson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x000FC;nemann</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Gross organic phosphorus mineralization rates can be assessed in a Ferralsol using an isotopic dilution method</article-title>. <source>Geoderma.</source> (<year>2015</year>) 257&#x02013;<volume>8</volume>:<fpage>86</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.01.003</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<label>50.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pistocchi</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x000E9;sz&#x000E1;ros</surname> <given-names>&#x000C9;</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamburini</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x000FC;nemann</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Biological processes dominate phosphorus dynamics under low phosphorus availability in organic horizons of temperate forest soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>126</volume>:<fpage>64</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>75</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.08.013</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<label>51.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Orlowski</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frede</surname> <given-names>HG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Br&#x000FC;ggemann</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Breuer</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Validation and application of a cryogenic vacuum extraction system for soil and plant water extraction for isotope analysis</article-title>. <source>J Sensors Sens Syst.</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>179</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/jsss-2-179-2013</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<label>52.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tamburini</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernasconi</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Angert</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weiner</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A method for the analysis of the &#x003B4;18O of inorganic phosphate extracted from soils with HCl</article-title>. <source>Eur J Soil Sci.</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>61</volume>:<fpage>1025</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>32</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01290.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<label>53.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Precise calibration of equilibrium oxygen isotope fractionations between dissolved phosphate and water from 3 to 37&#x000B0;C</article-title>. <source>Geochim Cosmochim Acta.</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>150</volume>:<fpage>314</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>29</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2014.10.030</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<label>54.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hsieh</surname> <given-names>JCC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>OA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>EF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Savin</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Oxygen isotopic composition of soil water: quantifying evaporation and transpiration</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source>. (<year>1998</year>) <volume>82</volume>:<fpage>269</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0016-7061(97)00105-5</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<label>55.</label>
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>R Core Team</collab></person-group>. <source>A language and environment for statistical computing</source>. (<year>2018</year>). Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.r-project.org">http://www.r-project.org</ext-link></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<label>56.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buehler</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oberson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>IM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friesen</surname> <given-names>DK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Sequential phosphorus extraction of a 33P-labeled oxisol under contrasting agricultural systems</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc Am J</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>66</volume>:<fpage>868</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>77</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj2002.8680</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<label>57.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vu</surname> <given-names>DT</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Armstrong</surname> <given-names>RD</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Transformations and availability of phosphorus in three contrasting soil types from native and farming systems: a study using fractionation and isotopic labeling techniques</article-title>. <source>J Soils Sediments.</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>18</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>29</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11368-009-0068-y</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<label>58.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Condron</surname> <given-names>LM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Newman</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Revisiting the fundamentals of phosphorus fractionation of sediments and soils</article-title>. <source>J Soils Sediments.</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>830</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>40</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11368-011-0363-2</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<label>59.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Klotzb&#x000FC;cher</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaiser</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klotzb&#x000FC;cher</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wolff</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mikutta</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Testing mechanisms underlying the Hedley sequential phosphorus extraction of soils</article-title>. <source>J Plant Nutr Soil Sci.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>182</volume>:<fpage>570</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jpln.201800652</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<label>60.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Margenot</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Navigating limitations and opportunities of soil phosphorus fractionation</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil.</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>459</volume>:<fpage>13</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-020-04552-x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<label>61.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Daroub</surname> <given-names>SH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pierce</surname> <given-names>FJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ellis</surname> <given-names>BG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phosphorus fractions and fate of phosphorus-33 in soils under plowing and no-tillage</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc Am J</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>64</volume>:<fpage>170</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj2000.641170x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<label>62.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fardeau</surname> <given-names>J-C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morel</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boniface</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phosphate ion transfer from soil to soil solution: kinetic parameters</article-title>. <source>Agronomie.</source> (<year>1991</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>787</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>97</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/agro:19910909</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<label>63.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morel</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tunney</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pl&#x000E9;net</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pellerin</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Transfer of phosphate ions between soil and solution: perspectives in soil testing</article-title>. <source>J Environ Qual.</source> (<year>2000</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>50</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010007x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<label>64.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dam</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hart</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>OA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berhe</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Quantifying uncertainties in sequential chemical extraction of soil phosphorus using XANES spectroscopy</article-title>. <source>Environ Sci Technol.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>54</volume>:<fpage>2257</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>67</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.est.9b05278</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31922406</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65">
<label>65.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tamburini</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pfahler</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x000FC;nemann</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guelland</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernasconi</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Oxygen isotopes unravel the role of microorganisms in phosphate cycling in soils</article-title>. <source>Environ Sci Technol.</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>46</volume>:<fpage>5956</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>62</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/es300311h</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22545923</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66">
<label>66.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chapin</surname> <given-names>FS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barsdate</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bar&#x000E8;l</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phosphorus cycling in Alaskan Coastal Tundra: a hypothesis for the regulation of nutrient cycling</article-title>. <source>Oikos.</source> (<year>1978</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>189</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>99</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/3543562</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<label>67.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cade-Menun</surname> <given-names>BJJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Using phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to characterize organic phosphorus in environmental samples</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baldwin</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names></name></person-group>, editors. <source>Organic Phosphorus in the Environment</source>. <publisher-loc>Wallingford, CT</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CAB International</publisher-name> (<year>2005</year>). p. <fpage>21</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>44</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<label>68.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tamburini</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pistocchi</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Helfenstein</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A method to analyse the isotopic composition of oxygen associated to organic phosphorus in soil and plant material</article-title>. <source>Eur J Soil Sci</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>69</volume>:<fpage>816</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>26</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ejss.12693</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<label>69.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jarosch</surname> <given-names>KA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Doolette</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smernik</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamburini</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x000FC;nemann</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Characterisation of soil organic phosphorus in NaOH-EDTA extracts: a comparison of 31P NMR spectroscopy and enzyme addition assays</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>91</volume>:<fpage>298</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>309</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.09.010</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<label>70.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Torn</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trumbore</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>OA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hendricks</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Mineral control of soil organic carbon storage and turnover</article-title>. <source>Nature.</source> (<year>1997</year>) <volume>389</volume>:<fpage>3601</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/38260</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<label>71.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mikutta</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schaumann</surname> <given-names>GE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gildemeister</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonneville</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kramer</surname> <given-names>MG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chorover</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Biogeochemistry of mineral&#x02013;organic associations across a long-term mineralogical soil gradient (0.3&#x02013;4100kyr), Hawaiian Islands</article-title>. <source>Geochim Cosmochim Acta.</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>73</volume>:<fpage>2034</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>60</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2008.12.028</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<label>72.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kramer</surname> <given-names>MG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanderman</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>OA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chorover</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Long-term carbon storage through retention of dissolved aromatic acids by reactive particles in soil</article-title>. <source>Glob Chang Biol.</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>2594</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>605</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02681.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<label>73.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kleber</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sollins</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sutton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A conceptual model of organo-mineral interactions in soils: self-assembly of organic molecular fragments into zonal structures on mineral surfaces</article-title>. <source>Biogeochemistry.</source> (<year>2007</year>) <volume>85</volume>:<fpage>9</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>24</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10533-007-9103-5</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<label>74.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walworth</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Soil drying and rewetting, or freezing and thawing, affects soil solution composition</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc Am J.</source> (<year>1992</year>) <volume>56</volume>:<fpage>433</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600020015x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<label>75.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Manzoni</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Katul</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Invariant soil water potential at zero microbial respiration explained by hydrological discontinuity in dry soils</article-title>. <source>Geophys Res Lett.</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>41</volume>:<fpage>7151</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2014GL061467</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<label>76.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lis</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weiner</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pitt</surname> <given-names>FD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keren</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Angert</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Phosphate uptake by cyanobacteria is associated with kinetic fractionation of phosphate oxygen isotopes</article-title>. <source>ACS Earth Sp Chem.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>233</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00099</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<label>77.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bouskill</surname> <given-names>NJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>TE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baran</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bowen</surname> <given-names>BP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Belowground response to drought in a tropical forest soil. I. Changes in Microbial Functional Potential and Metabolism</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol.</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>525</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.00525</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27148214</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B78">
<label>78.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Oxygen isotope signature of Pi regeneration from organic compounds by phosphomonoesterases and photooxidation</article-title>. <source>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.</source> (<year>2006</year>) <volume>70</volume>:<fpage>3957</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>69</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2006.04.036</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<label>79.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blagodatskaya</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuzyakov</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Active microorganisms in soil: critical review of estimation criteria and approaches</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem.</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>67</volume>:<fpage>192</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>211</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.024</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<label>80.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blume</surname> <given-names>H-P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Br&#x000FC;mmer</surname> <given-names>GW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Horn</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kandeler</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>K&#x000F6;gel-Knabner</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <source>Scheffer/Schachtschabel: Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde</source>. <publisher-loc>Berlin</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer-Verlag</publisher-name> (<year>2010</year>).</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>