Front. Robot. AI Frontiers in Robotics and AI Front. Robot. AI 2296-9144 Frontiers Media S.A. 1251568 10.3389/frobt.2023.1251568 Robotics and AI Correction Corrigendum: Bioethics and artificial intelligence: between deliberation on values and rational choice theory Pinto-Bustamante et al. 10.3389/frobt.2023.1251568 Pinto-Bustamante Boris Julián 1 2 3 * † Riaño-Moreno Julián C. 1 4 5 † Clavijo-Montoya Hernando Augusto 1 ‡ Cárdenas-Galindo María Alejandra 6 ‡ Campos-Figueredo Wilson David 6 ‡ 1 Bioethics Department, Bioethics, Life Sciences Research Group, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia 2 School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Medical and Health Sciences Education Research Group, Bogotá, Colombia 3 Member of the Regional Committee Number 1—Donation and Transplantation Network, Bogotá, Colombia 4 Faculty of Medicine, Cooperative University of Colombia, Villavicencio, Colombia 5 Medical Subdirection, National Institute of Cancerology, Bogotá, Colombia 6 Medical, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia

Approved by Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

 *Correspondence: Boris Julián Pinto-Bustamante, borisjpinto@gmail.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

These authors have contributed equally to this work

 18 07 2023 2023 10 1251568 01 07 2023 05 07 2023 Copyright © 2023 Pinto-Bustamante, Riaño-Moreno, Clavijo-Montoya, Cárdenas-Galindo and Campos-Figueredo. 2023 Pinto-Bustamante, Riaño-Moreno, Clavijo-Montoya, Cárdenas-Galindo and Campos-Figueredo

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on Bioethics and artificial intelligence: between deliberation on values and rational choice theory by Pinto-Bustamante BJ, Riaño-Moreno JC, Clavijo-Montoya HA, Cárdenas-Galindo MA and Campos-Figueredo WD (2023). Front. Robot. AI 10:1140901. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1140901 echo chamber artificial intelligence filter bubble decision-making algorithmic reasoning rational choice theory section-at-acceptance Human-Robot Interaction

In the published article, there was an error in affiliation 1. Instead of “Bioethics Department, El Bosque University, Bogotá, Colombia”, it should be “Bioethics Department, Bioethics, Life Sciences Research Group, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia”.

In the published article, there was an error in affiliation 2. Instead of “School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Del Rosario University, Bogotá, Colombia”, it should be “School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Medical and Health Sciences Education Research Group, Bogotá, Colombia”.

In the published article, there was an error in affiliation 5. Instead of “Department of Bioethics, El Bosque University, Bogotá, Colombia”, it should be “Bioethics Department, Bioethics, Life Sciences Research Group, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia”.

In the published article, there was an error in affiliation 7. Instead of “Medical, El Bosque University, Bogotá, Colombia”, it should be “Medical, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia”.

In the published article, there was an error. error in the translation of a sentence: “In this sense, algorithms can be a part of groups of incontrovertible decision-making rules (uncritical/normative character)”.

A correction has been made to 2 AI and the RCT: the conversion of values into data, paragraph 12. This sentence previously stated:

“In this sense, algorithms can be a part of groups of incontrovertible decision-making rules (uncritical/normative character.”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“In this sense, algorithms depict a set of incontrovertible decision-making rules (uncritical/normative character).”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.