<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Reprod. Health</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Reproductive Health</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Reprod. Health</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2673-3153</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/frph.2025.1509710</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Reproductive Health</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Influencing factors of three pronuclei incidence and their impact on pregnancy outcomes in women with good prognosis undergoing conventional <italic>in vitro</italic> fertilization with donor sperm: a retrospective cohort study</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Jianhua</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Xiang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref><uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1268215/overview"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>Shengjia</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Mingzhao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">&#x002A;</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref><uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2866123/overview" />
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/><role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>The ART Center, Northwest Women&#x2019;s and Children&#x2019;s Hospital</institution>, <addr-line>Xi&#x0027;an</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p><bold>Edited by:</bold> Ioannis Sfontouris, Hygeia Hospital, Greece</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p><bold>Reviewed by:</bold> Dimitra Nikiforaki, Mitera Hospital, Greece</p>
<p>Emilio Gomez, University of Murcia, Spain</p></fn>
<corresp id="cor1"><label>&#x002A;</label><bold>Correspondence:</bold> Mingzhao Li <email>limingzhao828@163.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><label><sup>&#x2020;</sup></label><p>ORCID Jianhua Sun <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9762-2177">orcid.org/0000-0002-9762-2177</ext-link> Xiang Liu <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7200-9467">orcid.org/0000-0001-7200-9467</ext-link> Shengjia Shi <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0704-7210">orcid.org/0000-0002-0704-7210</ext-link> Mingzhao Li <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9525-8052">orcid.org/0000-0001-9525-8052</ext-link></p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>03</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date>
<volume>7</volume><elocation-id>1509710</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>10</month><year>2024</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>26</day><month>02</month><year>2025</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; 2025 Sun, Liu, Shi and Li.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Sun, Liu, Shi and Li</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract><sec><title>Purpose</title>
<p>This study aimed to investigate the influencing factors of three pronuclei (3PN) zygote incidence and their impact on pregnancy outcomes in women with good prognosis undergoing conventional <italic>in vitro</italic> fertilization with donor sperm (C-IVFD).</p>
</sec><sec><title>Methods</title>
<p>This retrospective study included women aged 35 years or younger who underwent the long/ultra-long follicular phase agonist protocol between January 2014 and January 2021. C-IVFD cycles were divided into the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group (no 3PN zygotes) and the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group (with 3PN zygotes). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors influencing 3PN zygote incidence. The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, abortion and live birth rates. The secondary outcomes were cleavage, high-quality embryo, available embryo, implantation and ectopic pregnancy rates.</p>
</sec><sec><title>Results</title>
<p>1,250 embryo transfer cycles were included in this study. The peak estradiol (E<sub>2</sub>) level on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration (OR: 1.16, 95&#x0025; CI 1.12&#x2013;1.19, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001) and the number of retrieved oocytes (OR: 1.08, 95&#x0025; CI 1.05&#x2013;1.11, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001) were independently associated with 3PN incidence. Compared to the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group, the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group exhibited significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rates (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.033) and live birth rates (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.009), as well as lower abortion rate (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.026). No significant differences were found between the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; and 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; groups in cleavage, high-quality embryo, available embryo, implantation and ectopic pregnancy rates (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
</sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The peak E<sub>2</sub> level on hCG administration day and the number of retrieved oocytes were independently associated with 3PN incidence. The incidence of 3PN zygotes has a negative impact on pregnancy outcomes in women with good prognosis undergoing C-IVFD.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>three pronuclei</kwd>
<kwd>conventional <italic>in vitro</italic> fertilization</kwd>
<kwd>donor sperm</kwd>
<kwd>infertility</kwd>
<kwd>pregnancy outcomes</kwd>
<kwd>live birth rate</kwd>
</kwd-group><contract-num rid="cn001">2023-YBSF-034</contract-num><contract-sponsor id="cn001">Shaanxi Technology Committee Industrial Public Relation Project</contract-sponsor><counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="3"/><equation-count count="0"/><ref-count count="43"/><page-count count="9"/><word-count count="0"/></counts><custom-meta-wrap><custom-meta><meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name><meta-value>Assisted Reproduction</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
<p>Infertility impacts roughly 15&#x0025; of couples globally, with male factors contributing to 20&#x0025;&#x2013;30&#x0025; of cases and female factors accounting for 20&#x0025;&#x2013;35&#x0025;. Furthermore, a combined contribution from both factors is implicated in 25&#x0025;&#x2013;40&#x0025; of infertility instances. It is noteworthy that there has been a steady increase in the demand for fertility treatments utilizing donor sperm in recent years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>). The quality of semen is influenced by various factors, including the male&#x0027;s own health status, lifestyle habits, and age. Donor sperm sourced from nationally approved and operated human sperm banks undergo rigorous screening and testing, ensuring their quality and quantity. Studies have demonstrated that the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes does not increase when using donor sperm compared to using partner sperm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>). The utilization of donor sperm results in a decrease in the rates of miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>), while simultaneously increasing the rates of live births (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>). In China, the primary reasons for utilizing donor sperm for assisted reproduction are azoospermia and failures in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).</p>
<p>In the process of <italic>in vitro</italic> fertilization (IVF)&#x2014;embryo transfer, normal fertilization is defined as the appearance of two distinct pronuclei (PN) within the oocyte 16&#x2013;20&#x2005;h post-fertilization, accompanied by the presence of two polar bodies. Conversely, cases of a single pronucleus (1PN), three pronuclei (3PN), multiple pronuclei (multiple PN), and the absence of pronuclei (0PN) in fertilized oocytes are considered abnormal fertilizations and are discarded. Although studies have shown that some embryos derived from abnormally fertilized oocytes can lead to the birth of normal offspring through embryo transfer, in situations where sufficient embryos from normal 2PN sources are available, abnormally fertilized embryos are still discarded. Multiple mechanisms prevent polyspermy to ensure normal fertilization. However, despite these safeguards, the formation of 3PN zygotes can still occur in some cycles undergoing conventional <italic>in vitro</italic> fertilization (C-IVF). According to reports, the incidence of 3PN zygotes during C-IVF ranges from 2&#x0025; to 10&#x0025; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>).</p>
<p>The oocyte is widely recognized as the primary determinant of embryonic developmental potential (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>). Maternal age is a pivotal factor contributing to the decline in fertility and adverse reproductive outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>). Women over the age of 35 years experience reduced fertility, and their oocytes are more prone to errors in meiotic chromosome segregation, resulting in oocytes with an incorrect number of chromosomes, a condition known as aneuploidy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>). When using IVF, there is no significant difference in the live birth rate per oocyte retrieval cycle and per embryo transfer cycle among male partners of various age groups when the female partner is younger than 35 years old or falls within the 40&#x2013;44 age group. However, when the female partner is aged between 35 and 39, a trend of decreasing live birth rate is observed as the male partner&#x0027;s age increases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>).</p>
<p>Both sperm and oocyte factors are pivotal in ensuring successful fertilization and subsequent embryonic development. Individuals who exhibit a favorable response to ovarian stimulation are more prone to experiencing 3PN zygotes. It has been established that the occurrence of 3PN zygotes is linked to a heightened response to gonadotropin stimulation, often evidenced by an elevated number of retrieved oocytes in patients undergoing ICSI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). One of our previous studies, which focused on female patients younger than 38 years old undergoing C-IVF with donor sperm (C-IVFD), revealed that more retrieved oocytes and higher peak estradiol (E<sub>2</sub>) level on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration are risk factors for the incidence of 3PN zygotes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). Another study, which included female patients younger than 40 years old undergoing C-IVF with partner&#x0027;s sperm, demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the number of retrieved oocytes between the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group and the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>).</p>
<p>To minimize the potential confounding effects of factors from maternal age and partner&#x0027;s semen quality, this study included women under 35 years old and cycles involving donor sperm for <italic>in vitro</italic> fertilization, and aimed to investigate the effect of 3PN incidence on pregnancy outcomes in women with a favorable prognosis undergoing conventional <italic>in vitro</italic> fertilization with donor sperm-embryo transfers (C-IVFD-ETs).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="methods"><label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2a"><label>2.1</label><title>Study design</title>
<p>A retrospective cohort study was conducted in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for observational studies. This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of Northwest Women&#x0027;s and Children&#x0027;s Hospital (approval number: 2023003).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2b"><label>2.2</label><title>Setting, participants and variables</title>
<p>This study included first-time C-IVFD-ETs cycles with fresh embryo transfer performed at Northwest Women&#x0027;s and Children&#x0027;s Hospital from January 2014 to January 2021.</p>
<p>The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) women with age&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;35 years; (2) receiving long/ultra-long agonist protocol ovarian stimulation; and (3) first-time C-IVFD-ETs cycles. The exclusion criteria were: (1) history of oocyte <italic>in vitro</italic> maturation; (2) previous uterine or ovary surgery; (3) presence of uterine malformation; and (4) undergoing ovarian stimulation with antagonist, short or ultra-short protocol.</p>
<p>As illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x00A0;1</xref>, a total of 1,250 cycles were included and categorized into two groups: the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group, consisting of cycles with no 3PN zygotes (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;635), and the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group, comprising cycles with the presence of 3PN zygotes (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;615).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float"><label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Study flow chart.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="frph-07-1509710-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2c"><label>2.3</label><title>Outcomes</title>
<p>The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, abortion and live birth rates. The secondary outcomes were cleavage, high-quality embryo, available embryo, implantation, and ectopic pregnancy rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2d"><label>2.4</label><title>Ovarian stimulation protocol</title>
<p>All ovarian stimulation cycles were conducted using first-attempt down-regulated protocols (long or ultra-long protocols) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a; Decapeptyl&#x00AE;, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Germany), followed by controlled ovarian hyperstimulation using follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) preparations. The stimulation protocol employed either recombinant FSH (Gonal-F&#x00AE;, Merck Serono, Switzerland), urinary-derived FSH (Puregon&#x00AE;, N.V. Organon, Netherlands; Urofollitropin&#x00AE;, Livzon Pharmaceutical, China), or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG&#x00AE;, Livzon Pharmaceutical, China) containing both FSH and luteinizing hormone activity. The daily dosage of stimulation medication was decided and adjusted based on patient characteristics and treatment response to achieve optimal ovarian stimulation. When more than 3 follicles exceeded 18&#x2005;mm in size, a dose of 10,000 units of hCG was administered. Subsequently, oocyte retrieval was performed 36&#x2005;h later by a transvaginal ultrasonography-guided aspiration process.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2e"><label>2.5</label><title>Origin of sperm and C-IVFD procedure</title>
<p>After retrieval, the oocyte-cumulus complexes (OCCs) were cultured in a specialized medium (G-IVF; Vitrolife, Sweden). Conventional <italic>in vitro</italic> fertilization with donor sperm (C-IVFD) was performed using semen from donor. Semen samples were obtained from Shaanxi Province Human Sperm Bank. The general procedures for donor recruitment, sperm freezing, and recipient selection followed the standards of National Health and Family Planning Commission (NHFPC) of the People&#x0027;s Republic of China. The semen parameters for donors adhered to the National Sperm Bank (before freezing: volume &#x2265;2.0&#x2005;ml, concentration &#x2265;60 million/ml, progressive motility &#x2265;60&#x0025;, normal sperm morphology &#x2265;70&#x0025;; after thawing: concentration &#x2265;15 million/ml, progressive motility &#x2265;32&#x0025;, normal sperm morphology &#x2265;4&#x0025;) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). Semen samples were processed using a discontinuous density gradient centrifugation protocol (40&#x0025; and 80&#x0025; gradients; Sage, Costa Rica). Primary centrifugation was performed at 200&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;&#x2009;g for 20&#x2005;min at room temperature. Following supernatant removal, the resulting pellet was resuspended in sperm washing medium (Spermrinse; Vitrolife, Sweden) and subjected to secondary centrifugation at 200&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;&#x2009;g for 5&#x2005;min. Final sperm preparation was adjusted to achieve a concentration of 100,000 motile spermatozoa per 0.6&#x2005;ml fertilization medium for oocyte co-incubation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2f"><label>2.6</label><title>Embryo culture and assessment</title>
<p>All culture media were overlaid with paraffin oil (Ovoil; Vitrolife, Sweden) and equilibrated in a humidified atmosphere at 37&#x00B0;C for at least 24&#x2005;h before use. 5&#x2005;h after C-IVFD insemination, the zygotes were transferred to a cleavage medium (G-1 plus; Vitrolife, Sweden). Sixteen to twenty hours post-fertilization, the fertilization status was observed under an inverted microscope by confirming the presence of two polar bodies in the perivitelline space and the pronuclei within the zygote. The number of pronuclei (PN) in each zygote was recorded: zygotes with two pronuclei (2PN) were considered normally fertilized; those with a single pronucleus (1PN) or &#x2265;3PN were classified as abnormally fertilized. The occurrence of zygotes with 3PN was specifically documented. On day 3, only the embryos derived from 2PN zygotes designated for blastocyst culture were subsequently transferred to a blastocyst medium (G-2 plus; Vitrolife, Sweden), where they remained until day 6. The cleavage-stage embryos were evaluated based on the homogeneity of blastomeres, the number of blastomeres, and the degree of embryo fragmentation. High-quality cleavage-stage embryos were classified as graded I or II. The available cleavage-stage embryos were graded I, II, and III (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). The blastocyst-stage embryos were graded according to the method proposed by Gardner, with scores assigned based on their developmental stage ranging from 1 to 6, the quality of the inner cell mass, and the trophectoderm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>). High-quality blastocysts were defined as those graded &#x2265;3BB.</p>
<p>Most of the embryos were cultured in conventional incubators. A small fraction of embryos, primarily from patients with a higher number of retrieved oocytes or previous unsuccessful cycles, were cultured in an EmbryoScope time-lapse device (Vitrolife, Sweden). The 16-well plates were prepared the day before insemination. Two 180 &#x03BC;l drops of cleavage medium were placed in an EmbryoSlide&#x002B;(Vitrolife, Sweden) covered with 1.4&#x2005;ml of mineral oil (Vitrolife, Sweden). These plates were maintained at 37&#x00B0;C, under 6&#x0025; CO<sub>2</sub>, 5&#x0025; O<sub>2</sub>, and 89&#x0025; N<sub>2</sub> atmosphere. Images of each embryo were captured every 20&#x2005;min in seven different focal planes throughout the culture period and were later analyzed using the EmbryoViewer external image analysis software (Vitrolife, Sweden). Embryos with multinucleation at the 2-cell stage (MN2) were specifically documented through time-lapse monitoring.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2g"><label>2.7</label><title>Embryo transfer and pregnancy confirmation</title>
<p>In our center, a maximum of two embryos were transferred in each cycle. The cleavage-stage embryo was transferred on day 3, while the blastocyst-stage embryo was transferred on day 5 or 6. Patients were given 60&#x2005;mg progesterone (Xianju Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd.; Zhejiang, China) via intramuscular injection or 90&#x2005;mg of vaginal progesterone gel (Crinone&#x00AE;, Merck Serono, Switzerland) daily following embryo transfer for 10 weeks. An ET catheter (Cook Ireland Ltd., Limerick, Ireland) was utilized to place the embryos with the guidance of transabdominal ultrasound. To increase the success rate of embryo transfer, the mucus at the cervical os was removed beforehand with a cotton swab soaked in warm saline solution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>). Serum <italic>&#x03B2;</italic>-hCG levels were measured 14 days after cleavage-stage embryo transfer and 12 days after blastocyst transfer. Clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of an intrauterine gestational sac on ultrasonography during the first trimester. Ongoing pregnancy was defined as a clinical pregnancy that continued for at least 12 weeks. Abortion was defined as loss of clinical pregnancy before 24&#x2009;weeks. Live birth was defined as a pregnancy resulting in the birth of at least a live infant.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2h"><label>2.8</label><title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Statistical analysis between groups for continuous variables was performed with <italic>Student&#x0027;s t</italic>-test for data with normal distribution. A non-parametric <italic>Mann&#x2013;Whitney U-test</italic> was performed for data with skewed distribution. Statistical analysis between groups for categorical variables was expressed as number and percentage and <italic>Chi-square</italic> test or <italic>Fisher exact</italic> test was performed. Forward logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the risk factors for 3PN incidence. The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp.; NY, USA). <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results"><label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3a"><label>3.1</label><title>The characteristics of participants</title>
<p>The flow chart of the study is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x00A0;1</xref>. Ultimately, a total of 1,250 cycles were included. The 1,250 cycles were divided into two groups: the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;635, 50.8&#x0025;) and the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group (<italic>n</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;615, 49.2&#x0025;). The general and laboratory data of patients are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x00A0;1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float"><label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>The general characteristics and laboratory data.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Variables</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025;</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025;</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>p-</italic>value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. transfers</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">635</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">615</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age, years</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.27&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;3.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.93&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;3.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.053</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BMI, kg/m<sup>2</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.15&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;3.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.02&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.217</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Basal FSH (mIU/ml)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.87&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.67&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;1.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.110</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Basal E<sub>2</sub> (pg/ml)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.13&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;24.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.05&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;22.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.947</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total Gn dosage (IU)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,081.80&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;782.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,024.37&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;707.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.185</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gn stimulation, days</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.50&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.79&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;7.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.348</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Peak E<sub>2</sub> level on hCG administration day (pg/ml)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,240.57&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2,125.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,638.49&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2,242.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table-fn2">&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. of retrieved oocytes (<italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.19&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;4.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.87&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;4.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table-fn2">&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Infertility type (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.699</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x00A0;Primary infertility</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">77.8 (494)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78.7 (484)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x00A0;Secondary infertility</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.2 (141)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.3 (131)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Endometrial thickness (mm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.05&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.08&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;2.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.626</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. transferred embryos&#x2009;&#x003D;<sans-serif>&#x2009;1</sans-serif></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">291</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">293</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.425</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cleavage-stage (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.9 (55)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.4 (48)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Blastocyst-stage (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81.1 (236)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.6 (245)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. transferred embryos &#x003D;2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">344</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">322</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.470</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cleavage-stage (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.6 (260)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78.0 (251)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Blastocyst-stage (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.4 (84)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.0 (71)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Normal fertilization (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.3 (4,481/6,470)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.9 (4,576/7,279)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table-fn2">&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cleavage (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.1 (4,351/4,481)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.6 (4,422/4,576)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.205</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">High-quality embryo (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56.7 (2,465/4,351)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56.6 (2,504/4,422)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.979</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Available embryo (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86.9 (3,782/4,351)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">88.2 (3,902/4,422)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.061</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="table-fn1"><p>BMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; E<sub>2</sub>, estradiol; Gn, gonadotropin; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin.</p></fn>
<fn id="table-fn2"><label>&#x002A;</label>
<p><italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3b"><label>3.2</label><title>The influencing factors of 3pn incidence</title>
<p>The multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the incidence of 3PN zygotes, considering potential factors such as age, body mass index (BMI), basal FSH, basal E<sub>2</sub>, peak E<sub>2</sub> level on hCG administration day, total gonadotropin (Gn) dosage, Gn stimulation time, and the number of retrieved oocytes serving as independent variables. It was observed that the peak E<sub>2</sub> level on the day of hCG administration (OR: 1.16, 95&#x0025; CI 1.12&#x2013;1.19, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001) and the number of retrieved oocytes (OR: 1.08, 95&#x0025; CI 1.05&#x2013;1.11, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001) were independently associated with 3PN incidence (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x00A0;2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float"><label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for 3PN incidence.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Variables</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">OR</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">95&#x0025; CI</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>p-</italic>value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age, years</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.94&#x2013;1.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.143</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BMI, kg/m<sup>2</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.94&#x2013;1.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.302</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Basal FSH (mIU/ml)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93&#x2013;1.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.477</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Basal E<sub>2</sub> (pg/ml)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99&#x2013;1.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.782</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Peak E<sub>2</sub> level on hCG administration day (pg/ml)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.12&#x2013;1.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table-fn4">&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total Gn dosage (IU)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00&#x2013;1.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.950</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gn stimulation, days</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.98&#x2013;1.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.561</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. of retrieved oocytes (<italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.05&#x2013;1.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x003C;0.001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table-fn4">&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="table-fn3"><p>CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; BMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; E<sub>2</sub>, estradiol; Gn, gonadotropin; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin.</p></fn>
<fn id="table-fn4"><label>&#x002A;</label>
<p><italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3c"><label>3.3</label><title>The impact of 3pn on pregnancy outcomes</title>
<p>Regardless of the transfer stage, no significant differences were observed in the rates of cleavage (97.1&#x0025; vs. 96.6&#x0025;, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;<italic>&#x003D;</italic>&#x2009;0.205), high-quality embryos (56.7&#x0025; vs. 56.6&#x0025;, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;<italic>&#x003D;</italic>&#x2009;0.979), available embryos (86.9&#x0025; vs. 88.2&#x0025;, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;<italic>&#x003D;</italic>&#x2009;0.061), implantation (59.4&#x0025; vs. 56.6&#x0025;, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.201), clinical pregnancy (72.9&#x0025; vs. 68.5&#x0025;, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.083), or ectopic pregnancy (0.6&#x0025; vs. 0.5&#x0025;, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.732) between the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group and 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group, as detailed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Tables&#x00A0;1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>. A significant increase was observed in ongoing pregnancy rates (68.5&#x0025; vs. 62.8&#x0025;, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.033) and live birth rates (66.9&#x0025; vs. 59.8&#x0025;, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.009) in the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group compared to those in the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group. The abortion rate in the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group was significantly lower than that in the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group (7.8&#x0025; vs. 12.3&#x0025;, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.026) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x00A0;3</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float"><label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; and 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; groups.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup>
<col align="left"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
<col align="center"/>
</colgroup>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left" rowspan="2">Parameter</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">Cleavage-stage</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" rowspan="2"><italic>p-</italic>value</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">Blastocyst-stage</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" rowspan="2"><italic>p-</italic>value</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">Total</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" rowspan="2"><italic>p-</italic>value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025;</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025;</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025;</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025;</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025;</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025;</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. transfers</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">315</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">299</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">320</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">316</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">635</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">615</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Implantation (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52.5 (302/575)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.5 (278/550)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.507</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.3 (280/404)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.1 (252/387)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.229</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.4 (582/979)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56.6 (530/937)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.201</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Clinical pregnancy (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">71.4 (225/315)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67.2 (201/299)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.259</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74.4 (238/320)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.6 (220/316)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.182</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72.9 (463/635)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">68.5 (421/615)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.083</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ongoing pregnancy (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67.9 (214/315)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.2 (186/299)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.137</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.1 (221/320)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63.3 (200/316)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.124</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">68.5 (435/635)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.8 (386/615)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.033<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table-fn5">&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Twin pregnancies (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.2 (77/225)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.8 (76/201)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.441</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.6 (42/238)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.5 (32/220)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.368</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.7 (119/463)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.7 (108/421)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.871</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ectopic pregnancy (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3 (3/225)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5 (1/201)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.372</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0 (0/238)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5 (1/220)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.298</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6 (3/463)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5 (2/421)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.732</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Abortion (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.6 (17/225)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.4 (23/201)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.0 (19/238)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.1 (29/220)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.070</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.8 (36/463)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.3 (52/424)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.026<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table-fn5">&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Live birth (&#x0025;, <italic>n</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.0 (208/315)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.5 (178/299)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.096</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67.8 (217/320)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60.1 (190/316)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.044&#x002A;<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table-fn5">&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.9 (425/635)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.8 (368/615)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.009<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table-fn5">&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="table-fn5"><label>&#x002A;</label>
<p><italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>When the results were analyzed based on embryo transfer stage, we observed that among patients who underwent cleavage-stage embryo transfer, there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between the two groups (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x00A0;3</xref>). However, in patients undergoing blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, the live birth rate was significantly higher in the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group compared to the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group (67.8&#x0025; vs. 60.1&#x0025;, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.044) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x00A0;3</xref>).</p>
<p>Additionally, our data demonstrated that the clinical pregnancy (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.369), ongoing pregnancy (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.191), and live birth rates (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.148) decreased as the number of 3PN zygotes increased for patients undergoing blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, but no significant differences were observed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x00A0;2</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float"><label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates in patients undergoing blastocyst-stage embryo transfer with embryos derived from zygotes with different 3PN numbers. CP: clinical pregnancy; OP: ongoing pregnancy; LB: live birth.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="frph-07-1509710-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>By using time-lapse monitoring, 180 normal embryos from the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group and 157 normal embryos from the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group were analyzed and documented. Although the MN2 rate was slightly higher in the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group than in the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group, the difference was not statistically significant (23.6&#x0025; vs. 16.1&#x0025;, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.085).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion"><label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<p>Multiple mechanisms prevent polyspermy and ensure normal fertilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). However, polyspermy safeguards are imperfect, as evidenced by the persistent occurrence of 3PN zygotes in C-IVFD cycles. The causes of 3PN are diverse and primarily attributed to oocyte-derived meiotic failure and polyspermic fertilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>). In the present study, the use of rigorously screened donor sperm minimized confounding effects of male factors.</p>
<p>Comparing outcomes between donor sperm cycles, partner sperm cycles, and ICSI cycles offers valuable insights. In ICSI, sperm-oocyte interaction is bypassed, theoretically eliminating polyspermy. However, ICSI does not fully prevent 3PN formation, as oocyte activation defects or retention of the second polar body can mimic triploidy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>). Studies report lower 3PN rates in ICSI (2&#x0025;&#x2013;5&#x0025;) compared to C-IVF (2&#x0025;&#x2013;10&#x0025;) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>), yet ICSI cycles with 3PN zygotes still exhibit poorer outcomes, akin to our findings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>). Conversely, partner sperm cycles may introduce confounding variables like sperm DNA fragmentation, which exacerbates fertilization abnormalities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>). Future research should directly compare C-IVF (donor vs. partner sperm) and ICSI cohorts to delineate the roles of sperm competence vs. fertilization technique in 3PN etiology.</p>
<p>Physiological mechanisms linking ovarian response to 3PN risk were further elucidated. Patients exhibiting robust pharmacological responses often yield higher proportions of immature or post-mature oocytes, elevating 3PN susceptibility. Immature oocytes may inadequately execute cortical and zona reactions, while post-mature oocytes exhibit impaired cortical granule release, both increasing polyspermy risk. One of our previous studies, which focused on female patients under 38 years of age undergoing C-IVFD, revealed that more retrieved oocytes and higher peak E<sub>2</sub> level on hCG administration day are risk factors for the incidence of 3PN zygotes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). Our data in the present study further corroborated this observation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>).</p>
<p>Other potential contributors warrant exploration. Firstly, genetic predispositions, such as mutations in cortical granule-related genes (e.g., <italic>JUNO</italic> or <italic>ovastacin</italic>), may impair the cortical reaction, increasing susceptibility to polyspermy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>). Secondly, laboratory conditions, including suboptimal sperm-oocyte incubation ratios or variations in culture media composition, could inadvertently promote abnormal fertilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>). Thirdly, environmental factors, such as oxidative stress during oocyte maturation, may compromise zona pellucida integrity, further predisposing to polyspermy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>). Future studies should investigate these variables to refine protocols and mitigate 3PN incidence.</p>
<p>Several studies analyzed the impact of 3PN on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing ICSI. Figueira et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>) found that cycles with a 3PN incidence greater than 25&#x0025; had a 3.5-fold higher risk of miscarriage. Dayal et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>) also reported a statistically significant inverse correlation between a high proportion of 3PN zygotes and clinical pregnancy rates. Rosen et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>) further demonstrated that 3PN formation was a significant negative predictor of implantation. One of our previous studies, which included 509 early rescue- ICSI cycles showed that there was no significant difference in good quality embryo, available embryo, implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates between the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; and 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; groups. However, the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group showed significantly lower abortion than that in the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>). Our present study reported the impact of 3PN on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing C-IVFD, and demonstrated that the absence of 3PN zygotes was associated with significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rates and live birth rates, alongside a lower abortion rate.</p>
<p>The observed reduction in ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates in cycles with 3PN zygotes may stem from downstream embryological consequences. Even when embryos derived from 2PN zygotes are transferred, the presence of 3PN zygotes in the cohort may reflect broader oocyte quality issues. Aneuploidy, mitochondrial dysfunction, or epigenetic anomalies in sibling oocytes could impair embryonic developmental competence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>). Additionally, time-lapse monitoring revealed a trend toward higher MN2 rates in the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group, suggesting that mitotic errors in ostensibly normal embryos may contribute to implantation failure or early pregnancy loss (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>). These findings align with studies linking 3PN cycles to increased embryonic mosaicism and reduced blastocyst euploidy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>). Thus, 3PN incidence may serve as a biomarker for suboptimal oocyte quality, indirectly affecting pregnancy outcomes even in transferred embryos.</p>
<p>MN2, a cytokinesis-related nuclear abnormality, may further elucidate 3PN-associated outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>). While prior studies proposed a link between high 3PN proportions and MN2 incidence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>), our time-lapse data showed no statistically significant difference in MN2 rates between groups, though limited by sample size. Cycles with robust ovarian responses (elevated E<sub>2</sub>, high oocyte yield) are prone to MN2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>), a phenomenon potentially masked in conventional incubators due to restricted observational windows (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>). Notably, cleavage-stage transfers in our cohort showed comparable outcomes regardless of 3PN status, possibly because MN2 typically occurring approximately 43&#x2005;h post-fertilization, escapes detection in day-3 assessments.</p>
<p>Egashira et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>) demonstrated that blastocysts derived from MN2 embryos exhibit similar implantation potential to those derived from normal embryos. Balakier et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>) proposed that the majority of MN2 embryos have the capacity to self-correct during early cleavage divisions and can develop into euploid blastocysts, ultimately leading to the birth of healthy infants. These findings suggest that extending the culture of MN2 embryos to the blastocyst stage before transfer could potentially improve pregnancy outcomes. However, our data revealed significantly lower live birth rates in blastocyst transfers from the 3PN&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0&#x0025; group, suggesting that 3PN presence signals intrinsic embryo cohort deficiencies unmitigated by extended culture. This underscores the need for comprehensive embryo selection strategies integrating genetic and morphokinetic assessments.</p>
<sec id="s4a"><label>4.1</label><title>The strengths and limitations of the study</title>
<p>One of the primary strengths of this study lies in its large sample size, which enhances the reliability of the findings. Furthermore, the use of donor sperm allowed us to minimize the impact of abnormal sperm on reproductive outcomes, thereby isolating the effects of oocyte quality. Recognizing the pivotal role of oocyte quality in embryo development, we specifically targeted IVD-ETs for our analysis. Moreover, conducting the study at a single center ensured that the embryos were cultured in uniform media and graded according to consistent criteria, thereby eliminating potential biases introduced by variations in culture media and techniques.</p>
<p>This study has certain limitations that should be acknowledged. Firstly, its retrospective design represents a major constraint. By focusing solely on fresh cycles, we were unable to factor in the detrimental effects of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on endometrial receptivity. Secondly, despite observing a potential link between the frequency of MN2 events and the occurrence of 3PN zygotes, the relatively limited sample size used for time-lapse monitoring may have hindered our capacity to detect statistically significant differences in reproductive outcomes.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions"><label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
<p>In conclusion, the peak E<sub>2</sub> level on hCG administration day and the number of retrieved oocytes were independently associated with the presence of 3PN zygotes in a cohort of fertilized oocytes. The incidence of 3PN zygotes had a negative influence on pregnancy outcomes in women with a good prognosis undergoing C-IVFD-ETs.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability"><title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="ethics-statement"><title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Review Board of Northwest Women&#x0027;s and Children&#x0027;s Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="author-contributions"><title>Author contributions</title>
<p>JS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. XL: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing &#x2013; original draft. SS: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. ML: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="funding-information"><title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This project was supported by Shaanxi Technology Committee Industrial Public Relation Project (Project Number: 2023-YBSF-034).</p>
</sec>
<ack><title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>The authors would like to thank the support from staff of the ART Center, Northwest Women&#x0027;s and Children&#x0027;s Hospital, study participants, data collectors, and supervisors for participation during the data collection process.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="COI-statement"><title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s14" sec-type="ai-statement"><title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer"><title>Publisher&#x0027;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list><title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>CP</given-names></name><name><surname>Marconi</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>McLernon</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhattacharya</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Maheshwari</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Outcomes of pregnancies using donor sperm compared with those using partner sperm: systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Hum Reprod Update</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>27</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>190</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>211</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/humupd/dmaa030</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33057599</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mignini Renzini</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Canto M</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Guglielmo</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Garcia</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>De Ponti</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>La Marca</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Sperm donation: an alternative to improve post-ICSI live birth rates in advanced maternal age patients</article-title>. <source>Hum Reprod</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>36</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<fpage>2148</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/humrep/deab148</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34143887</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gerkowicz</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name><name><surname>Crawford</surname><given-names>SB</given-names></name><name><surname>Hipp</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name><name><surname>Boulet</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Kissin</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Kawwass</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Assisted reproductive technology with donor sperm: national trends and perinatal outcomes</article-title>. <source>Am J Obstet Gynecol</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>218</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>421.e1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>421.e10</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.224</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29291411</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kamath</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Antonisamy</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Selliah</surname><given-names>HY</given-names></name><name><surname>La Marca</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Sunkara</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Perinatal outcomes following IVF with use of donor versus partner sperm</article-title>. <source>Reprod Biomed Online</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>36</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>705</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.016</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29673729</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>McLernon</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhattacharya</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Maheshwari</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Early pregnancy outcomes of IVF cycles using donor versus partner sperm: analysis of 1 376 454 cycles recorded by the human fertilisation and embryology authority (1991&#x2013;2016)</article-title>. <source>Hum Reprod</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>38</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>1194</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>201</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/humrep/dead057</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36961939</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Cumulative live birth rates following intrauterine insemination using donor and husband sperm in different age groups: a cohort study of 10&#x2009;415 insemination cycles</article-title>. <source>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>167</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>142</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ijgo.15539</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38623946</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yie</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Collins</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Daya</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hughes</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Sagle</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Younglai</surname><given-names>EV</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Polyploidy and failed fertilization in <italic>in vitro</italic> fertilization are related to patient&#x2019;s age and gamete quality</article-title>. <source>Hum Reprod</source>. (<year>1996</year>) <volume>11</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>614</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/humrep/11.3.614</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8671278</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Keefe</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalmbach</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Oocyte competency is the key to embryo potential</article-title>. <source>Fertil Steril</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>103</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>317</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.115</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25639967</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mikwar</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>MacFarlane</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Marchetti</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Mechanisms of oocyte aneuploidy associated with advanced maternal age</article-title>. <source>Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>785</volume>:<fpage>108320</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mrrev.2020.108320</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32800274</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The impact of maternal age on aneuploidy in oocytes: reproductive consequences, molecular mechanisms, and future directions</article-title>. <source>Ageing Res Rev</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>97</volume>:<fpage>102292</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.arr.2024.102292</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38582380</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duncan</surname><given-names>FE</given-names></name><name><surname>Jasti</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Paulson</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelsh</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Fegley</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Gerton</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Age-associated dysregulation of protein metabolism in the mammalian oocyte</article-title>. <source>Aging Cell</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>16</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>1381</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/acel.12676</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28994181</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Datta</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name><name><surname>Campbell</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Diaz-Fernandez</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Nargund</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Livebirth rates are influenced by an interaction between male and female partners&#x2019; age: analysis of 59&#x200A;951 fresh IVF/ICSI cycles with and without male infertility</article-title>. <source>Hum Reprod</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>39</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<fpage>2491</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>500</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/humrep/deae198</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39241250</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sachs</surname><given-names>AR</given-names></name><name><surname>Politch</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Jackson</surname><given-names>KV</given-names></name><name><surname>Racowsky</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Hornstein</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>Ginsburg</surname><given-names>ES</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Factors associated with the formation of triploid zygotes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection</article-title>. <source>Fertil Steril</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>73</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>1109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00521-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10856466</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Xue</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Three pro-nuclei (3PN) incidence factors and clinical outcomes: a retrospective study from the fresh embryo transfer of <italic>in vitro</italic> fertilization with donor sperm (IVF-D)</article-title>. <source>Int J Clin Exp Med</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>8</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<fpage>13997</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4003</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26550358</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Effects of three pro-nuclei (3PN) proportion incidence on clinical outcomes of patients with lower retrieved oocytes in the fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfer (ET) cycles</article-title>. <source>Gynecol Endocrinol</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>32</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<fpage>891</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09513590.2016.1190330</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27251984</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Gordts</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Reproductive outcomes with donor sperm in couples with severe male-factor infertility after intracytoplasmic sperm injection failures</article-title>. <source>J Assist Reprod Genet</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>37</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<fpage>1883</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10815-020-01828-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32440933</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Transferring two grades I cleavage-stage embryo might not be a good protocol</article-title>. <source>Gynecol Endocrinol</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>33</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<fpage>557</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09513590.2017.1302420</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28347191</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gardner</surname><given-names>DK</given-names></name><name><surname>Lane</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF?</article-title> <source>Hum Reprod Update</source>. (<year>1997</year>) <volume>3</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>367</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/humupd/3.4.367</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9459282</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eskandar</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Abou-Setta</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Amin</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Almushait</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Sobande</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Removal of cervical mucus prior to embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates in women undergoing assisted reproduction</article-title>. <source>Reprod Biomed Online</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>14</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>308</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60872-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17359583</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bianchi</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Doe</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Goulding</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Wright</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Juno is the egg izumo receptor and is essential for mammalian fertilization</article-title>. <source>Nature</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>508</volume>(<issue>7497</issue>):<fpage>483</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature13203</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24739963</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Que</surname><given-names>EL</given-names></name><name><surname>Duncan</surname><given-names>FE</given-names></name><name><surname>Bayer</surname><given-names>AR</given-names></name><name><surname>Philips</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Roth</surname><given-names>EW</given-names></name><name><surname>Bleher</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Zinc sparks induce physiochemical changes in the egg zona pellucida that prevent polyspermy</article-title>. <source>Integr Biol</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>9</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/c6ib00212a</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wozniak</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlson</surname><given-names>AE</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Ion channels and signaling pathways used in the fast polyspermy block</article-title>. <source>Mol Reprod Dev</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>87</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>350</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mrd.23168</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31087507</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yanagida</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Fujikura</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Katayose</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The present status of artificial oocyte activation in assisted reproductive technology</article-title>. <source>Reprod Med Biol</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>7</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>133</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1447-0578.2008.00210.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29699294</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Figueira</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Setti</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Braga</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Iaconelli</surname><given-names>A</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name><name><surname>Borges</surname><given-names>E</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name></person-group>. <article-title>Prognostic value of triploid zygotes on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes</article-title>. <source>J Assist Reprod Genet</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>28</volume>(<issue>10</issue>):<fpage>879</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10815-011-9610-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21805146</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dayal</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Gindoff</surname><given-names>PR</given-names></name><name><surname>Sarhan</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Dubey</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Peak</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Frankfurter</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effects of triploidy after intracytoplasmic sperm injection on <italic>in vitro</italic> fertilization cycle outcome</article-title>. <source>Fertil Steril</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>91</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.033</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18249397</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simon</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Murphy</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Shamsi</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Emery</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Aston</surname><given-names>KI</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Paternal influence of sperm DNA integrity on early embryonic development</article-title>. <source>Hum Reprod</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>29</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<fpage>2402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/humrep/deu228</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25205757</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ezoe</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Takahashi</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Shimazaki</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Miki</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanimura</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Amagai</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Human 1PN and 3PN zygotes recapitulate all morphokinetic events of normal fertilization but reveal novel developmental errors</article-title>. <source>Hum Reprod</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>37</volume>(<issue>10</issue>):<fpage>2307</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/humrep/deac177</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35950593</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sfontouris</surname><given-names>IA</given-names></name><name><surname>Martins</surname><given-names>WP</given-names></name><name><surname>Nastri</surname><given-names>CO</given-names></name><name><surname>Viana</surname><given-names>IG</given-names></name><name><surname>Navarro</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Raine-Fenning</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Blastocyst culture using single versus sequential media in clinical IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</article-title>. <source>J Assist Reprod Genet</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>33</volume>(<issue>10</issue>):<fpage>1261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>72</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10815-016-0774-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27491772</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Swain</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Carrell</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Cobo</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Meseguer</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubio</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>GD</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Optimizing the culture environment and embryo manipulation to help maintain embryo developmental potential</article-title>. <source>Fertil Steril</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>105</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>571</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.035</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26851765</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Agarwal</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Aponte-Mellado</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Premkumar</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Shaman</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gupta</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The effects of oxidative stress on female reproduction: a review</article-title>. <source>Reprod Biol Endocrinol</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>49</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1477-7827-10-49</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22748101</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rosen</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Dobson</surname><given-names>AT</given-names></name><name><surname>Fujimoto</surname><given-names>VY</given-names></name><name><surname>McCulloch</surname><given-names>CE</given-names></name><name><surname>Cedars</surname><given-names>MI</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Triploidy formation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection may be a surrogate marker for implantation</article-title>. <source>Fertil Steril</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>85</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>384</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1321</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16595215</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Bai</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Xue</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effects of three pro-nuclei (3PN) incidence on laboratory and clinical outcomes after early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (rescue-ICSI): an analysis of a 5-year period</article-title>. <source>Gyneco Endocrinol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>37</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>137</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>40</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09513590.2020.1757640</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fragouli</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Wells</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Mitochondrial DNA assessment to determine oocyte and embryo viability</article-title>. <source>Semin Reprod Med</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>33</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>401</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1055/s-0035-1567821</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26565384</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fauque</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Audureau</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Leandri</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Delaroche</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Assouline</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Epelboin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Is the nuclear status of an embryo an independent factor to predict its ability to develop to term?</article-title> <source>Fertil Steril</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>99</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>1299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1304.e3</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.028</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23540611</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Desch</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruno</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Luu</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Barberet</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Choux</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Lamotte</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Embryo multinucleation at the two-cell stage is an independent predictor of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes</article-title>. <source>Fertil Steril</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>107</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>103.e4</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.022</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28228320</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Capalbo</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ubaldi</surname><given-names>FM</given-names></name><name><surname>Rienzi</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Treff</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies: current challenges and future possibilities</article-title>. <source>Hum Reprod</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>32</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>492</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/humrep/dew250</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27738115</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meriano</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Clark</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Cadesky</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Laskin</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Binucleated and micronucleated blastomeres in embryos derived from human assisted reproduction cycles</article-title>. <source>Reprod Biomed Online</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>9</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>511</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61635-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15588469</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Xue</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>High three pro-nuclei (3PN) zygotes proportion associated with normal embryo multinucleation at the two-cell stage: two cases report</article-title>. <source>Gynecol Endocrinol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>36</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<fpage>1042</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09513590.2020.1779690</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32544013</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jackson</surname><given-names>KV</given-names></name><name><surname>Ginsburg</surname><given-names>ES</given-names></name><name><surname>Hornstein</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>Rein</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Clarke</surname><given-names>RN</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Multinucleation in normally fertilized embryos is associated with an accelerated ovulation induction response and lower implantation and pregnancy rates in <italic>in vitro</italic> fertilization-embryo transfer cycles</article-title>. <source>Fertil Steril</source>. (<year>1998</year>) <volume>70</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>60</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00100-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9660422</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De C&#x00E1;ssia Savio Figueira</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Souza Setti</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Paes De Almeida Ferreira Braga</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Iaconelli</surname><given-names>A</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name><name><surname>Borges</surname><given-names>E</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name></person-group>. <article-title>Blastomere multinucleation: contributing factors and effects on embryo development and clinical outcome</article-title>. <source>Hum Fertil (Camb)</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>13</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/14647273.2010.508505</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Royen</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Mangelschots</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Vercruyssen</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>De Neubourg</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Valkenburg</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ryckaert</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos</article-title>. <source>Hum Reprod</source>. (<year>2003</year>) <volume>18</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>1062</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/humrep/deg201</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12721185</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Egashira</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamauchi</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanaka</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Mine</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Otsubo</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Murakami</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Developmental capacity and implantation potential of the embryos with multinucleated blastomeres</article-title>. <source>J Reprod Dev</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>61</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>595</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>600</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1262/jrd.2015-052</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26346255</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balakier</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Sojecki</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Motamedi</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Librach</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Impact of multinucleated blastomeres on embryo developmental competence, morphokinetics, and aneuploidy</article-title>. <source>Fertil Steril</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>106</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>608</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>614.e2</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.041</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27206619</pub-id></citation></ref></ref-list>
</back>
</article>