AUTHOR=Gaspar Lucas P. , D. A. Scarpelli Marina , Oliveira Eliziane G. , Alves Rafael Souza-Cruz , Gomes Arthur Monteiro , Wolf Rafaela , Ferneda Rafaela Vitti , Kamazuka Silvia Harumi , Gussoni Carlos O. A. , Ribeiro Milton Cezar 

TITLE=Predicting bird diversity through acoustic indices within the Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Remote Sensing

VOLUME=Volume 4 - 2023

YEAR=2023

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/remote-sensing/articles/10.3389/frsen.2023.1283719

DOI=10.3389/frsen.2023.1283719

ISSN=2673-6187

ABSTRACT=The increasing conversion of natural areas to anthropic land uses has been the major cause of habitat loss destabilizing ecosystems and leading to a biodiversity crisis. Passive acoustic sensors open the possibility of remotely sensing fauna on large spatial and temporal scales, improving our understanding of the current state of biodiversity and the effects of impacts. Acoustic indices have been widely used and tested in recent years, aiming to understand the relationship between indices and the acoustic activity of several taxa in different types of environments. However, studies have shown divergent relationships between acoustic indices and the vocal activity of most soniferous taxa. A combination of indices has, in turn, been reported as a promising tool for representing biodiversity in different contexts. We used uni- and bivariate models to test different combinations of 8 common indices in relation to bird assemblage metrics. We recorded twenty-two study sites in Brazil's Atlantic Forest and three different types of environments in each site (forest, pasture, and swamp). Our results showed 1) the best acoustic indices for explaining bird richness, abundance and diversity were Bioacoustic and Acoustic Complexity; 2) the type of environment (forest, pasture, and swamp) influenced the performance of acoustic indices in explaining bird biodiversity, with the highest score model (biggest R² value) being a combination between Acoustic Diversity and Bioacoustic indices. Our results do support the use of acoustic indices in monitoring the acoustic activity of birds but combining indices is encouraged since it provided the best results. However, given the divergence we found across environments, we recommend that sets of indices are tested to determine which of them best describe the biodiversity patterns models for a specific habitat. Based on our results, we consider that we can predict biodiversity patterns through acoustic patterns. However, the level of confidence will depends on the used acoustic index and on focal taxa of interest (like bird, amphibians, insects and mammals).