AUTHOR=Alic Taner , Zehir Sinan , Yalcinkaya Meryem , Deniz Emre , Kiran Harun Emre , Afacan Onur 

TITLE=Artificial intelligence-assisted accurate diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tears using customized CNN and YOLOv9

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Radiology

VOLUME=Volume 5 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/radiology/articles/10.3389/fradi.2025.1691048

DOI=10.3389/fradi.2025.1691048

ISSN=2673-8740

ABSTRACT=BackgroundAccurate diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is critical for timely treatment planning. Deep learning (DL) approaches have shown promise in assisting clinicians, but many prior studies are limited by small datasets, lack of surgical confirmation, or exclusion of partial tears.AimTo evaluate the performance of multiple convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, including a proposed CustomCNN, for ACL tear detection using a surgically validated dataset.MethodsA total of 8,086 proton density–weighted sagittal knee MRI slices were obtained from patients whose ACL status (intact, partial, or complete tear) was confirmed arthroscopically. Eleven deep learning models, including CustomCNN, DenseNet121, and InceptionResNetV2, were trained and evaluated with strict patient-level separation to avoid data leakage. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsThe CustomCNN model achieved the highest diagnostic performance, with an accuracy of 91.5% (95% CI: 89.5–93.1), sensitivity of 92.4% (95% CI: 90.4–94.2), and an AUC of 0.913. The inclusion of both partial and complete tears enhanced clinical relevance, and patient-level splitting reduced the risk of inflated metrics from correlated slices. Compared with previous reports, the proposed approach demonstrated competitive results while addressing key methodological limitations.ConclusionThe CustomCNN model enables rapid and reliable detection of ACL tears, including partial lesions, and may serve as a valuable decision-support tool for radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. The use of a surgically validated dataset and rigorous methodology enhances clinical credibility. Future work should expand to multicenter datasets, diverse MRI protocols, and prospective reader studies to establish generalizability and facilitate integration into real-world workflows.