Front. Public Health Frontiers in Public Health Front. Public Health 2296-2565 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1741699 Correction Correction: Association of coffee consumption pattern and metabolic syndrome among middle-aged and older adults: a cross-sectional study Nina Ren 1 Lingling Huang 2 Qiushuang Li 3 Honglin Guo 4 Liyuan Sun 2 Yuting Zhang 2 * Internet Medical Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China Health Science Centre, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China Health Management Center, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University Clinical Medical Academy, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China School of Public Administration, South Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China Correspondence: Zhang Yuting, zhangyuting@szu.edu.cn 13 01 2026 2025 13 1741699 07 11 2025 29 12 2025 Copyright © 2026 Nina, Lingling, Qiushuang, Honglin, Liyuan and Yuting. 2026 Nina, Lingling, Qiushuang, Honglin, Liyuan and Yuting https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. A Correction on Association of coffee consumption pattern and metabolic syndrome among middle-aged and older adults: a cross-sectional study by Nina, R., Lingling, H., Qiushuang, L., Honglin, G., Liyuan, S., and Yuting, Z. (2023). Front. Public Health. 11:1022616. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1022616 coffee consumption black coffee instant coffee fasting blood glucose blood pressure section-at-acceptance Public Health and Nutrition

There was a mistake in the caption of Table 2 for the values of the ORs of the elevated FBG for women. We previously stated:

“Table 2 summarized the multivariable-adjusted OR and 95% CI of MetS components across the type of coffee by gender. Regardless of the coffee type, compared with non-coffee consumers, coffee consumers had higher ORs of the elevated FBG in both men (OR: 3.590; 95% CI: 2.891–4.457) and women (OR: 3.590; 95% CI: 2.891–4.457). In women, the prevalence of elevated blood pressure (OR: 0.661; 95% CI: 0.454–0.963) was significantly lower in black coffee consumers than in non-coffee consumers. The same inverse association can be also found in other types of coffee consumption.”

The corrected caption of Table 2 appears below.

“Table 2 summarized the multivariable-adjusted OR and 95% CI of MetS components across the type of coffee by gender. Regardless of the coffee type, compared with non-coffee consumers, coffee consumers had higher ORs of the elevated FBG in both men (OR: 3.590; 95% CI: 2.891–4.457) and women (OR: 3.464; 95% CI: 2.589–4.634). In women, the prevalence of elevated blood pressure (OR: 0.661; 95% CI: 0.454–0.963) was significantly lower in black coffee consumers than in non-coffee consumers. The same inverse association can be also found in other types of coffee consumption.”

In the abstract, there was a mistake in the values of the ORs of the elevated FBG for women. We previously stated:

“Regardless of the coffee type, compared with non-coffee consumers, coffee consumers had higher odds ratios (ORs) of the elevated fasting blood glucose (FBG) in both men [OR: 3.590; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.891–4.457] and women (OR: 3.590; 95% CI: 2.891–4.457).”

This has been corrected to read:

“Regardless of the coffee type, compared with non-coffee consumers, coffee consumers had higher odds ratios (ORs) of the elevated fasting blood glucose (FBG) in both men [OR: 3.590; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.891–4.457] and women (OR: 3.464; 95% CI: 2.589–4.634).”

The original version of this article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Edited and reviewed by: Terry Huang, City University of New York, United States