<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Public Health</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Public Health</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Public Health</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-2565</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpubh.2025.1740030</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Analyzing the current situation and influencing factors of rural doctors&#x2019; intervention in hospice care services in Guangxi</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>Shuang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>Lang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3266378"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Zhao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, School of Public Health and Management</institution>, <city>Nanning</city>, <state>Guangxi</state>, <country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Public Affairs, Xiamen University</institution>, <city>Xiamen</city>, <state>Fujian</state>, <country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>&#x002A;</label>Correspondence: Zhao Li, <email xlink:href="mailto:lizhaoxmu@foxmail.com">lizhaoxmu@foxmail.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-01-14">
<day>14</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1740030</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>05</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>24</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>29</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2026 Liang, Jiang and Li.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Liang, Jiang and Li</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-01-14">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>This study aimed to assess the current status and identify the key determinants of hospice care involvement among rural doctors in Guangxi, China, using Self-Determination Theory (SDT) as a framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 368 rural doctors from August to September 2024, with 312 valid responses (84.8% response rate). Data were collected using an online questionnaire assessing hospice care knowledge, willingness to provide care, and SDT-related psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness). Chi-square tests and ordinal logistic regression were used for analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Respondents demonstrated moderate knowledge of hospice care (8.9% comprehensive) but relatively high willingness (21.7% highly willing). The primary services provided included psychological support (75.0%) and companionship (59.6%). Multivariate analysis revealed that higher knowledge levels were positively associated with greater willingness to participate in research. Paradoxically, lower educational attainment (high school/associate degree vs. bachelor&#x2019;s degree) was a significantly positive predictor of willingness (OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.07, <italic>p&#x202F;=</italic> 0.002; OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;2.88, <italic>p&#x202F;=</italic> 0.002). Other key determinants aligned with SDT&#x2014;professional identity (relatedness) and manageable workload (autonomy)&#x2014;were positive motivators, whereas perceived unfair medical liability risk and excessive workload were significant barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Rural doctors in Guangxi showed a promising willingness to engage in hospice care, but their involvement was significantly constrained by systemic and motivational factors beyond mere knowledge. Interventions grounded in the SDT&#x2014;such as enhancing competence through targeted training, ensuring autonomy via workload management and legal safeguards, and fostering relatedness through professional support&#x2014;are essential for leveraging this willingness and improving end-of-life care in rural China.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Guangxi</kwd>
<kwd>hospice care</kwd>
<kwd>influencing factors</kwd>
<kwd>rural doctors</kwd>
<kwd>self-determination theory</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine Introduction of Doctoral Research Initiation Fund Project &#x201C;Study on the Impact Mechanism of Drug Volume-Based Procurement Policy on the Medication Burden of Chronic Diseases in Guangxi&#x201D; (2021BS017).</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="1"/>
<table-count count="8"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="27"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="7105"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Aging and Public Health</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Ensuring access to dignified end-of-life care is a global public health imperative and key indicator of an equitable healthcare system. In China, rapid population aging has escalated hospice care demand, particularly in rural regions, where the proportion of older adults exceeds that in urban areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>). While national policy advancements such as the 2024 inclusion of hospice care in medical service pricing guidelines signal growing recognition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>), a profound urban&#x2013;rural disparity persists, with services and resources predominantly concentrated in cities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>). This gap is particularly concerning because rural residents often face higher barriers in accessing quality end-of-life support (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>).</p>
<p>In these resource-constrained settings, village doctors, certified frontline providers in China&#x2019;s rural health system, serve as indispensable gatekeepers of community health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>). Their unique position within communities makes them potentially key agents for delivering primary-level hospice care (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>). However, their capacity to fulfill this role is challenged by systemic constraints, including heavy workloads, limited training opportunities, and inadequate infrastructure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>). Existing research on hospice care in China has largely focused on urban hospitals and licensed medical staff (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>), leaving a significant knowledge gap regarding the perceptions, competencies, and motivations of rural doctors, especially in underdeveloped regions, such as the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region.</p>
<p>The Self-Determination Theory (SDT) offers a robust framework (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>). The SDT posits that satisfying three basic psychological needs&#x2014;competence (feeling effective), autonomy (sense of choice), and relatedness (connection to others)&#x2014;fosters high-quality, self-motivated engagement. Applying this lens, a rural doctor&#x2019;s willingness to provide hospice care may depend not only on knowledge (competence) but also on factors such as control over workload (autonomy) and supportive professional relationships (relatedness). Although the SDT has been applied in healthcare, its use in investigating rural hospice care engagement remains novel (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Self-determination theory model.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpubh-13-1740030-g001.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Flowchart titled "Self-Determination Theory Model" showing relationships between cognition, intention, and service behavior in hospice care. Cognition is influenced by personal characteristics, including gender, age, and education. Intention is influenced by the external environment, including workload and occupational risk. Autonomy, competence, and relatedness connect cognition to intention and intention to service behavior.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>This study aimed to bridge this critical gap by investigating the status and determinants of hospice care involvement among rural doctors in Guangxi, China. The specific objectives were as follows: (1) to assess their level of knowledge and willingness regarding hospice care; (2) to identify the sociodemographic, occupational, and psychosocial factors (informed by the SDT) associated with these outcomes; and (3) to provide evidence-based recommendations for policy and practice. We hypothesized that higher knowledge levels and factors supporting psychological needs satisfaction (e.g., professional identity and fair workload) would be positively associated with a greater willingness to provide care, whereas perceived barriers (e.g., high medical liability risk and low-income satisfaction) would exhibit negative associations.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Method</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Study design and reporting guidelines</title>
<p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among rural doctors in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region between August and September 2024. This study was designed in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for cross-sectional studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Participants and sampling</title>
<p>A two-stage stratified sampling method was used. First, 11 towns were randomly selected from each of the 14 prefecture-level cities in Guangxi for a total of 154 towns. Second, a list of eligible rural doctors was created for each town. From this list, two to three doctors were selected via simple random sampling (two if fewer than five eligible doctors were available, and three if five or more were available).</p>
<p>The sample size was calculated <italic>a priori</italic> using G&#x002A;Power 3.1 software. The parameters were set as follows: <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.05, &#x03B2;&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.2 (power&#x202F;=&#x202F;80%), effect size <italic>f</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.05 (small effect), and 12 predictor variables. A minimum sample size of 286 participants was required for this study. Accounting for an estimated 20% non-response rate, 368 questionnaires were distributed to participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Inclusion and exclusion criteria</title>
<p>The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) registered rural doctors holding a valid practice certificate, (2) working in a village clinic within one of the 154 selected towns, (3) having contact with terminally ill patients (e.g., those with advanced chronic diseases) in daily practice, and (4) providing voluntary informed consent.</p>
<p>The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) administrative or logistical staff in village clinics not directly involved in clinical services, (2) those on long-term leave (&#x003E;3&#x202F;months) during the survey period, and (3) those with severe physical or mental illness that impaired their ability to complete the questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Data collection and ethical considerations</title>
<p>Data were collected using an online structured questionnaire distributed through the Wenjuanxing platform. Before distribution, the research team coordinated with local health administrations at the prefectural and township levels to facilitate the survey. Township health centers sent the questionnaire link to eligible rural doctors via WeChat.</p>
<p>A total of 368 questionnaires were submitted. All responses were subjected to rigorous two-step validation. First, to prevent duplicate responses, the Wenjuanxing platform was configured to allow only one submission per unique WeChat ID and IP address. Second, two trained research assistants independently performed a manual review of all 368 records included in the study. Invalid questionnaires were excluded based on the following pre-defined criteria: (1) missing data for key demographic variables (e.g., age, certification) or the core dependent variables (knowledge or willingness); (2) logical inconsistencies (e.g., selecting &#x201C;no knowledge of hospice care&#x201D; but later detailing specific services provided); or (3) evidence of random or inattentive responding, such as identical answers across all matrix questions (straight-lining) or implausibly short completion times (&#x003C; one-third of the median time). Following this screening, 56 questionnaires were excluded, resulting in 312 valid questionnaires for analysis, a valid response rate of 84.8%.</p>
<p>The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine (Approval No.: GXTCMU-EC KS20251222-04). All the procedures adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The first page of the online questionnaire presented a detailed electronic informed consent form outlining the purpose of the study, procedures, potential risks and benefits, data confidentiality, and the voluntary nature of participation. The participants were required to provide consent before proceeding. No direct financial incentives were provided; however, completion of the survey was acknowledged as a continuing educational activity by the supporting local health bureaus. De-identified data supporting these findings may be made available from the corresponding author upon request.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Questionnaire development and measures</title>
<p>The questionnaire was developed through a literature review and expert interviews and comprised 56 items across four domains: (1) sociodemographic and occupational characteristics, (2) hospice care knowledge, (3) hospice care willingness, and (4) psychological needs related to the SDT (autonomy, competence, and relatedness).</p>
<p>Hospice care knowledge was assessed using participants&#x2019; self-rated familiarity. The willingness to provide hospice care was measured using a Likert scale. The key independent variables included education level, professional identity, satisfaction with medical and public health workloads, perceived fairness of workload and medical liability risk, perceived job difficulty, and quality of professional relationships.</p>
<p>The formal questionnaire demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach&#x2019;s <italic>&#x03B1;</italic> coefficient of 0.89. A parallel analysis confirmed a five-factor structure that accounted for 65% of the total variance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Data were cleaned using Microsoft Excel 2019 and analyzed using SPSS version 25.0. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables. Chi-square tests were performed for the univariate analysis to identify factors associated with hospice care knowledge and willingness to participate.</p>
<p>Ordered logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis, with knowledge and willingness as ordinal dependent variables. The parallel lines test confirmed that the proportional odds assumption was met (&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;=&#x202F;24.354, df&#x202F;=&#x202F;23, <italic>p&#x202F;=</italic> 0.384), validating the use of this model. The model fit was assessed using the chi-square model and goodness-of-fit statistics.</p>
<p>Strategies to Address Potential Biases: To assess non-response bias, we compared early respondents (first 75%) with late respondents (last 25%) on key demographics (age, sex, and education) using chi-square tests; no significant differences were found (all <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05). Harman&#x2019;s single-factor test was used to evaluate the risk of common method bias. The unrotated factor solution revealed that the first factor accounted for 28.7% of the variance, which was below the 50% threshold, suggesting that common method bias was not a major concern. Missing data were minimal (&#x003C;2% for any variable) and were assumed to be missing completely at random (MCAR). Cases with missing dependent variables in the regression models were excluded.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec9">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Demographic and professional characteristics of participants</title>
<p>Of the 368 questionnaires distributed, 312 were retained for analysis, yielding a valid response rate of 84.8%. The demographic and occupational profiles of the respondents are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>. The sample comprised more male (57.7%) than female (42.3%) village doctors, with the majority (63.1%) aged between 40 and 60&#x202F;years. In terms of educational attainment, 36.2% held an associate&#x2019;s degree, 28.8% completed high school or technical secondary school, and 28.8% had a bachelor&#x2019;s degree or higher. Most worked in standardized clinics (81.7%) operating under the national essential drug system (91.6%). A significant proportion of physicians combined medical practice with farming, with only 28.8% practicing medicine full-time. The most common monthly income brackets were RMB 3,001&#x2013;4,000 (30.4%) and RMB 2,001&#x2013;3,000 (29.3%).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Demographic and occupational characteristics of participating rural doctors (<italic>N</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;312).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Characteristic</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Category</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>n</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">%</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Gender</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Male</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">178</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">57.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Female</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">134</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">42.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="4">Age (years)</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x003C; 30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">42.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">30&#x2013;49</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">174</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">56.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">50&#x2013;69</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">28.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x2265; 70</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">3.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="4">Marital status</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Unmarried</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">40</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">12.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Married</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">259</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">83.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Divorced</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">2.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Widowed</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">1.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="5">Education</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Primary school or below</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">1.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Junior high school</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">5.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">High school/technical secondary school</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">27.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Associate degree</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">113</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">36.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Bachelor&#x2019;s degree or above</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">90</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">28.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="4">Monthly income (RMB)</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x2264; 2,000</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">25.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">2,001&#x2013;3,000</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">29.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3,001&#x2013;4,000</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">28.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x2265; 4,001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">51</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">16.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="5">Primary occupation</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Full-time medical practice</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">90</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">28.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Mainly medical practice, supplemented by farming</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">100</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">32.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Equal time on medical practice and farming</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">98</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">31.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Mainly farming, supplemented by medical practice</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">6.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Other</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">1.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="4">Professional certification</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Assistant medical practitioner</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">51</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">16.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Medical practitioner (physician)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">10.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Rural doctor practice certificate</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">210</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">67.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Other</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">5.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Percentages were calculated based on the total number of valid responses for each characteristic. Age data were missing for five participants.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Current status of hospice care knowledge, willingness, and practice</title>
<p>As presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>, respondents exhibited moderate overall knowledge of hospice care. Only 8.9% reported a comprehensive understanding, 41.3% had a relatively good understanding, and 45.2% had only general familiarity. Participants reported a generally positive willingness to provide rural hospice care: 21.7% were highly willing, 41.3% moderately willing, and 32.0% neutral. The primary services currently provided were psychological care (75.0%), companionship, and comfort (59.6%). The most-cited motivations for willingness to participate were professional dedication (53.3%) and personal compassion (32.5%), whereas the main reasons for unwillingness were perceived insufficient ability (40.0%) and an overly heavy workload (33.3%).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Current status of hospice care knowledge, willingness, and practice among rural doctors (<italic>N</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;312).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Classification</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Specific content</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>n</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">%</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="5">Understanding of hospice care services</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Very well understand</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">9.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Relatively understanding</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">103</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">33.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">General</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">141</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">45.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Less understanding</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">9.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Very unclear</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="5">Willingness to receive hospice care services</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Very willing</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">68</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">21.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">More willing</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">129</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">41.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">General</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">100</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">32.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Relatively unwilling</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Very reluctant</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">Reasons for being willing to participate in hospice care services</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Personal feelings</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">64</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">32.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Work tasks</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">13.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Dedication and devotion</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">105</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">53.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Others</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">Reasons for unwillingness to participate in hospice care services</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Insufficient ability</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">40.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">The work tasks are heavy, and there is no time.</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">33.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">There are no such indicators in the performance evaluation.</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">20.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Others</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">6.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="5">Available hospice care services</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Prescribe painkillers</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">209</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">67.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Accompany and comfort</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">186</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">59.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Daytime care</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">130</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">42.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Provide psychological care</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">234</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">75.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Others</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Univariate analysis of factors associated with knowledge and willingness</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref> provides a detailed coding scheme (variable assignment) for all independent and dependent variables included in the univariate and subsequent multivariate analyses. This clarifies how the Likert scale and continuous variables were categorized in the analysis.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Variable assignment for factors influencing rural doctors&#x2019; awareness and willingness regarding hospice care services.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Variable</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Assignment</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Gender</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Male, 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Female</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Age</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;0~&#x003C;29, 2=&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;30~49, 3=&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;50~69, 4&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2267;70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Years of practice</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;0~&#x003C;8, 2=&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;9~16, 3=&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;17~24, 4&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2267;25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Public health workload</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Low (including very low and somewhat low), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;High (including somewhat high and very high)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Satisfaction with medical workload</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Dissatisfied (including very dissatisfied and somewhat dissatisfied), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Satisfied (including somewhat satisfied and very satisfied)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Perceived fairness of workload distribution</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Unfair (including very unfair and somewhat unfair), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Fair (including somewhat fair and very fair)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Perceived fairness of medical liability risk</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Unfair (including very unfair and somewhat unfair), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Fair (including somewhat fair and very fair)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Satisfaction with average income</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Dissatisfied (including very dissatisfied and somewhat dissatisfied), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Satisfied (including somewhat satisfied and very satisfied)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Perceived job difficulty</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Disagree (including strongly disagree and somewhat disagree), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Agree (including somewhat agree and strongly agree)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Perceived job pressure</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Disagree (including strongly disagree and somewhat disagree), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Agree (including somewhat agree and strongly agree)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Perceived Job complexity</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Disagree (including strongly disagree and somewhat disagree), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Agree (including somewhat agree and strongly agree)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Adequacy of infrastructure</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Disagree (including strongly disagree and somewhat disagree), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Agree (including somewhat agree and strongly agree)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Relationship with leadership</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Poor (including very poor and somewhat poor), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Good (including somewhat good and very good)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Relationship with physicians</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Poor (including very poor and somewhat poor), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Good (including somewhat good and very good)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Relationship with colleagues</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Poor (including very poor and somewhat poor), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Good (including somewhat good and very good)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Relationship with patients</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Poor (including very poor and somewhat poor), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Good (including somewhat good and very good)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Availability of upward feedback channels</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Disagree (including strongly disagree and somewhat disagree), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Agree (including somewhat agree and strongly agree)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Timely response to raised issues</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Disagree (including strongly disagree and somewhat disagree), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Agree (including somewhat agree and strongly agree)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Perceived fairness of policy implementation</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Disagree (including strongly disagree and somewhat disagree), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Agree (including somewhat agree and strongly agree)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Awareness of hospice care services</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Knowledgeable (including very knowledgeable and somewhat knowledgeable), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Not knowledgeable (including somewhat unknowledgeable and very unknowledgeable)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Willingness to provide hospice care services</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1&#x202F;=&#x202F;Willing (including very willing and somewhat willing), 2&#x202F;=&#x202F;Moderate, 3&#x202F;=&#x202F;Unwilling (including somewhat unwilling and very unwilling)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Univariate analyses using chi-square tests identified several factors that were significantly associated with hospice care knowledge and willingness to participate. The results are detailed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Tables 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">5</xref>, where statistically significant <italic>p</italic>-values (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) are presented in bold.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Univariate analysis of rural doctors&#x2019; awareness of hospice care services.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Item</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Awareness of hospice care services</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">
<italic>P-value</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Knowledgeable</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Moderate</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Not</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Gender</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.762</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.092</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Male</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">66</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">85</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Female</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">65</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">56</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Age</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>14.978</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.020</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">0&#x202F;~&#x202F;&#x003C;29</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x003E;30~49</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">68</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">89</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x003E;50~69</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">36</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2267;70</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Years of practice</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.499</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.482</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">0~&#x003C;8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">44</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">39</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x003E;9~16</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">40</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x003E;17~24</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2267;25</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Public health workload</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.753</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.314</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Low</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">66</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">78</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">High</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">49</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">39</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">40</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Satisfaction with medical workload</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>15.711</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.003</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Dissatisfied</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">37</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">68</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Satisfied</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">77</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">63</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Perceived fairness of workload</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>14.881</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.005</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Unfair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">66</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">81</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">67</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Perceived fairness of medical liability risk</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>20.848</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>&#x003C;0.001</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Unfair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">48</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">74</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">68</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">49</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Satisfaction with average income</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">6.711</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Dissatisfied</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">21</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">44</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">64</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Satisfied</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">64</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">56</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Perceived job difficulty</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>13.333</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.01</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">53</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">80</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">56</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Perceived job pressure</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">8.111</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.088</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">53</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">67</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">53</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">51</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Adequacy of infrastructure</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>16.485</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.002</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">48</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">59</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">64</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">49</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Relationship with leadership</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>23.145</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>&#x003C;0.001</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Poor</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">52</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Good</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">107</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">82</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Relationship with physicians</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>20.750</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>&#x003C;0.001</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Poor</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">52</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Good</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">105</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">80</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Relationship with colleagues</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>15.137</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.004</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Poor</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Good</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">112</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">104</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Relationship with patients</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>12.149</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.016</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Poor</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">37</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Good</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">112</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">97</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Availability of upward feedback channels</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>11.627</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.020</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">42</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">90</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">86</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Timely response to raised issues</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>16.075</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.003</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">39</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">54</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">85</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">74</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Perceived fairness of policy implementation</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>15.183</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.004</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Unfair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">87</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">76</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Univariate analysis of rural doctors&#x2019; willingness to provide hospice care services.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Item</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Willingness to Provide hospice care Services</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">
<italic>P-value</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Willing</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Neutral</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Unwilling</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Gender</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.951</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.051</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Male</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">103</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">67</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Female</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">94</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Age</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.321</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.768</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">0~&#x003C;29</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x003E;30~49</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">112</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">54</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x003E;50~69</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">48</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2267;70</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Years of practice</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.456</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.615</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">0~&#x003C;8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">63</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x003E;9~16</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">52</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x003E;17~24</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">40</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2267;25</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">40</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Public health workload</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.236</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.375</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Low</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">111</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">52</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">High</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">57</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Satisfaction with medical workload</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>20.123</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>&#x003C;0.001</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Dissatisfied</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">65</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">57</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Satisfied</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">115</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Perceived fairness of workload</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>22.413</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>&#x003C;0.001</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Unfair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">59</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">55</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">124</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Perceived fairness of medical liability risk</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>21.033</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>&#x003C;0.001</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Unfair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">21</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">21</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">78</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">55</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">98</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Satisfaction with average income</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>18.798</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.001</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Dissatisfied</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">77</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">45</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Satisfied</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">97</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Perceived job difficulty</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>10.199</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.037</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">102</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">43</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">69</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Perceived job pressure</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.551</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.470</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">34</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">84</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">45</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">79</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Perceived job complexity</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">7.888</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.096</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">86</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">41</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">83</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">32</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Adequacy of infrastructure</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>10.803</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.029</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">32</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">79</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">40</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">86</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Relationship with leadership</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>11.890</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.018</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Poor</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">42</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">37</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Good</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">146</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">56</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Relationship with physicians</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.645</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.456</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Poor</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">32</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Good</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">137</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">61</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Relationship with colleagues</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">6.860</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.143</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Poor</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Good</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">159</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">72</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Relationship with patients</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.160</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.706</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Poor</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Good</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">153</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">72</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Availability of upward feedback channels</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>15.205</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.004</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">51</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">36</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">136</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">49</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Timely response to raised issues</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>9.907</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.042</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">62</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">40</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">122</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">46</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Perceived fairness of policy implementation</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Unfair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">62</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">122</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">49</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Awareness of hospice care services</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>74.621</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>&#x003C;0.001</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Knowledgeable</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">115</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">72</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">62</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Not knowledgeable</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Factors associated with knowledge (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>): significant factors (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) included age, satisfaction with medical workload, perceived fairness of medical liability risk, and availability of upward feedback channels. Factors showing highly significant associations (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001) included education level, relationship with leadership, and perceived fairness of policy implementation.</p>
<p>Factors associated with willingness (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref>): significant factors (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) included satisfaction with the medical workload, perceived fairness of workload distribution, medical liability risk, and infrastructure adequacy. Highly significant associations (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001) were found between average income satisfaction and the level of hospice care knowledge.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Multivariate analysis: determinants of knowledge and willingness</title>
<p>The parallel lines test confirmed that the proportional odds assumption was met (&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;=&#x202F;24.354, <italic>p&#x202F;=</italic> 0.384), thus validating the use of ordinal logistic regression models (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab6">Table 6</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Parallel lines test results.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Model</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;2 Log likelihood</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Chi-square</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">df</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Significance</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Null hypothesis</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">473.315</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Conventional</td>
<td align="char" valign="middle" char=".">448.961</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24.354</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.384</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>3.4.1</label>
<title>Determinants of hospice care knowledge</title>
<p>The multivariate model for knowledge demonstrated a good fit (final model &#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;=&#x202F;81.949, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001). As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab7">Table 7</xref>, after controlling for other variables, several factors remained significant independent predictors. Doctors under 29&#x202F;years of age had significantly lower odds of having more knowledge than those aged 70&#x202F;years and older (OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.11, <italic>p&#x202F;=</italic> 0.019). Dissatisfaction with medical workload was also a negative predictor. Conversely, perceiving medical liability risk as unfair, having access to upward feedback channels, and perceiving policy implementation as fair were associated with significantly higher odds of possessing knowledge. Furthermore, dissatisfaction with professional identity was a strong negative predictor (OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.20, <italic>p&#x202F;=</italic> 0.011).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab7">
<label>Table 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Ordinal logistic regression analysis of rural doctors&#x2019; awareness of hospice care services.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Item</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">B</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SE</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Wald &#x03C7;<sup>2</sup> value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>P-value</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">OR(95%CI)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Gender</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Male</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.454</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.261</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.030</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.082</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1.575(&#x2212;0.057, 0.965)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Female</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Age</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">0~&#x003C;29</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;2.209</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.941</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.507</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.019</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="("><bold>0.110(&#x2212;4.054, &#x2212;0.364)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x003E;30~49</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.354</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.825</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.690</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.101</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">0.258(&#x2212;2.971, 0.264)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x003E;50~69</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.574</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.836</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.543</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.060</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">0.207(&#x2212;3.214, 0.065)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2267;70</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Satisfaction with medical (Ref: &#x2265;70) workload</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Dissatisfied</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.298</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.545</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.669</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.017</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="("><bold>0.273(&#x2212;2.366, &#x2212;0.229)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.541</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.298</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.294</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.070</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1.718(&#x2212;0.043, 1.126)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Satisfied</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Perceived fairness of medical liability risk</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Unfair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.009</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.435</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.368</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.021</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="("><bold>2.743(0.155, 1.862)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.399</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.303</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.731</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.188</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1.490(&#x2212;0.195, 0.994)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Perceived job difficulty</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.830</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.376</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.874</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.027</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="("><bold>2.293(0.093, 1.567)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.286</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.295</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.939</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.333</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1.331(&#x2212;0.293, 0.865)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Availability of upward</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.375</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.562</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.994</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.014</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="("><bold>3.955(0.274, 2.476)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.079</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.350</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.052</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.820</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1.082(&#x2212;0.606, 0.765)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Perceived fairness of policy</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.247</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.537</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.394</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.020</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="("><bold>3.480(0.195, 2.300)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.401</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.333</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.446</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.229</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1.493(&#x2212;0.253, 1.055)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Professional identity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.608</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.634</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">6.423</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.011</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="("><bold>0.200(&#x2212;2.851, &#x2212;0.364)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.056</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.331</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.029</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.866</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">0.946(&#x2212;0.704, 0.593)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Professional qualification held (Ref: &#x2265;70)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Assistant practicing physician</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.293</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.648</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.981</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.046</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="("><bold>0.274(&#x2212;2.564, &#x2212;0.023)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Practicing physician</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.652</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.665</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.961</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.327</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">0.521(&#x2212;1.956, 0.652)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Rural doctor practice certificate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.462</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.600</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.592</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.442</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">0.630(&#x2212;1.638, 0.715)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">None</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>&#x002A;The last category of each variable was used as the reference group. Bold values indicate that the factor is significantly associated with the dependent variable (<italic>P</italic>&#x003C;0.05).</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.4.2</label>
<title>Determinants of willingness to provide hospice care</title>
<p>The model for willingness also showed a good fit (final model &#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;=&#x202F;95.514, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001). <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab8">Table 8</xref> presents the results are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab8">Table 8</xref>. A key finding was that educational level was negatively associated with the willingness to participate in the adjusted model. Compared with doctors with a bachelor&#x2019;s degree or higher, those with a high school/technical school (OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.07, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.002) or associate&#x2019;s degree (OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;2.88, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.002) were more willing to provide care. A neutral (versus satisfied) attitude towards the medical workload and professional identity, as well as a disagreement that work was difficult, were also associated with greater willingness.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab8">
<label>Table 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Ordinal logistic regression analysis of rural doctors&#x2019; willingness to provide hospice care services.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Item</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">B</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SE</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Wald &#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>P-value</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">OR(95%CI)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Gender</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Male</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.377</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.261</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.082</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.149</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1.458(&#x2212;0.135, 0.888)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Female</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Education level</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Primary school or below</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.793</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.949</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.571</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.059</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">6.007(&#x2212;0.067, 3.652)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Junior high school</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.095</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.591</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.432</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.064</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">2.989(&#x2212;0.064, 2.253)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">High school/technical secondary school</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.122</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.365</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">9.463</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.002</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="("><bold>3.071(0.407, 1.837)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Associate degree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.059</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.345</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">9.426</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.002</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="("><bold>2.883(0.383, 1.736)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Bachelor&#x2019;s degree or above</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Satisfaction with medical workload</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Dissatisfied</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.649</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.425</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.336</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.126</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">1.914(&#x2212;0.183, 1.481)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.849</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.272</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">9.719</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.002</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="("><bold>2.337(0.315, 1.382)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Satisfied</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Perceived job difficulty</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.838</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.409</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.208</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.040</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="("><bold>2.312(0.037, 1.639)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.120</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.332</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.131</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.717</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">0.887(&#x2212;0.770, 0.530)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Professional identity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disagree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.841</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.508</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.743</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.098</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">2.319(&#x2212;0.154, 1.837)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Neutral</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.956</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.298</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.304</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="."><bold>0.001</bold></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="("><bold>2.601(0.372, 1.540)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Agree</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Perceived fairness of medical liability risk</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Unfair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.419</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.417</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.010</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.315</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">0.658(&#x2212;1.237, 0.398)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.207</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.331</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.389</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.533</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="(">0.813(&#x2212;0.856, 0.443)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fair</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>&#x002A;The last category of each variable was set as the reference group: OR, Exp (B). Bold values indicate that the factor is significantly associated with the dependent variable (<italic>P</italic>&#x003C;0.05).</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The ordinal logistic regression model for willingness (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab8">Table 8</xref>) identified several independent predictors after adjustment. Notably, a lower educational level (high school/technical school or associate&#x2019;s degree, compared to a bachelor&#x2019;s degree or above) was significantly associated with greater willingness to provide hospice care (OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.07, <italic>p&#x202F;=</italic> 0.002 and OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;2.88, <italic>p&#x202F;=</italic> 0.002, respectively). Additionally, neutral (versus satisfied) attitudes towards medical workload and professional identity were positive predictors of willingness.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec16">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Principal findings and integration with research framework</title>
<p>This study provides novel insights into hospice care engagement among village doctors in the underdeveloped regions of China. Our findings revealed a complex interplay between knowledge, motivation, and context. In response to our research questions, we found that rural doctors in Guangxi possessed a moderate level of knowledge, but a relatively high willingness to provide hospice care (RQ1). This willingness is paradoxically higher among those with lower formal education and is significantly shaped by a constellation of occupational, psychological, and systemic factors (RQ2), as follows: The results largely support our hypotheses derived from SDT. Factors indicative of psychological need satisfaction such as professional identity (relatedness) and manageable workload (autonomy) were positively associated with engagement, whereas systemic barriers such as perceived unfair liability risk negatively impacted engagement (H2). Crucially, a strong positive correlation between knowledge level and willingness was confirmed (H1), but this relationship was moderated by the work context, underscoring the SDT&#x2019;s relevance in this setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Interpretation of key determinants and theoretical implications</title>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>4.2.1</label>
<title>The knowledge-willingness nexus and the role of education</title>
<p>The positive correlation between knowledge and willingness aligns with studies among urban healthcare professionals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>), confirming that understanding fosters intent. However, the negative association between higher education (bachelor&#x2019;s degree) and willingness in multivariate analysis is a striking and counterintuitive finding. This contrasts with reports from urban settings, where education often predicts greater palliative care engagement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>). An SDT-informed explanation posits that highly educated doctors in resource-poor villages may experience profound deficits in perceived competence. Their training may have equipped them with ideals that were unattainable in a setting lacking essential medications and support (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>), leading to frustration and reduced motivation to engage in complex and emotionally demanding hospice care. Conversely, doctors with secondary- or associate-level education may perceive their skills as better matched to the available resources, fostering a greater sense of efficacy and willingness to work.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>4.2.2</label>
<title>Professional identity as a core motivator</title>
<p>Professional identity emerged as one of the strongest positive factors. Most willing participants cited &#x201C;dedication&#x201D; and &#x201C;conscience&#x201D; as their primary motivators. This aligns with the SDT&#x2019;s relatedness needs, reflecting a deep-seated connection to their role as community guardians (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>). For many village doctors, providing companionship at the end of life is a fundamental part of their identity, offering an intrinsic fulfillment that transcends material incentives. This finding highlights a vital asset upon which interventions can be built: existing humanistic commitment within the rural medical workforce.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<label>4.2.3</label>
<title>Systemic barriers: workload, liability, and economic constraints</title>
<p>The negative impact of high medical workload satisfaction on willingness underscores critical system failure. This suggests that doctors who are already saturated with clinical and public health duties perceive hospice care as an unsustainable addition that erodes their sense of autonomy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>). Furthermore, the perception of unfair medical liability risk was a significant barrier, consistent with concerns documented in other settings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>). The fear of disputes is a powerful deterrent to the absence of clear legal safeguards or risk-sharing mechanisms.</p>
<p>Economic constraints underlie several of these barriers. The reported low income levels, coupled with the lack of specific funding for hospice care, create a fundamental mismatch. The additional time required for effective palliative support represents an uncompensated opportunity cost, making sustained engagement economically impractical for many and creating a bottleneck in rural healthcare globally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Recommendations for policy and practice</title>
<p>A multilevel strategy is required to translate the identified determinants into actionable policies. The following recommendations are made to systematically enhance the competence, autonomy, and relatedness of rural doctors, thereby fostering a sustainable environment for hospice care integration.</p>
<sec id="sec23">
<label>4.3.1</label>
<title>Establish a tiered, competency-based training system</title>
<p>A foundational step is to address this critical knowledge gap by developing a mandatory, standardized, yet locally adaptable, training curriculum. This program should be integrated into the continuing education framework for rural doctors by leveraging platforms such as the Guangxi Primary Health Care Talent Enhancement Project. Training must move beyond theory to focus on pragmatic skills, such as symptom management with limited medications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>), effective communication with families in a rural context, and self-care strategies to prevent burnout. Formal certification from such training validates hospice care as a core professional competency, directly strengthening the professional identity, which is a key motivator, and enhancing their sense of competence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec24">
<label>4.3.2</label>
<title>Create a supportive service network and resource guarantee mechanism</title>
<p>The systemic barriers of perceived high liability risk and an overwhelming workload must be addressed through structural support. This requires clearly defining hospice care services within rural doctors&#x2019; contractual responsibilities and establishing formalized referral pathways for specialist support at townships and county hospitals. This safety net reduces the burden of sole responsibility and mitigates the fear of unfair medical liability risk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>). Concurrently, policy reform must ensure the availability of essential palliative drugs (e.g., opioids) in village clinic formularies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>). Furthermore, promoting interdisciplinary teamwork by connecting rural doctors with nurses, public health workers, and potentially medical social workers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>) distributes the clinical and emotional load, builds professional relatedness, and counteracts the autonomy-eroding effect of isolated practice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec25">
<label>4.3.3</label>
<title>Implement integrated economic incentives and legal safeguards</title>
<p>Sustainable engagement requires economic and legal incentives. A multicomponent compensation model that links financial incentives to service quality, duration, and family satisfaction metrics should be introduced. This directly addresses the economic constraints identified in our study and offsets the opportunity costs of providing time-intensive care (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>). Simultaneously, legal and risk-protection frameworks must be strengthened. This includes developing provincial practice guidelines to standardize care and explicitly incorporate hospice care services into medical liability insurance schemes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>). These measures provide external security and perceived fairness necessary for autonomous and confident practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec26">
<label>4.3.4</label>
<title>Cultivate a receptive socio-cultural environment through education</title>
<p>Long-term success depends on changing the community context in which care is provided. Public awareness campaigns are needed to reframe perceptions of hospice care and address deep-seated cultural norms surrounding death and filial piety (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>). This reduces community resistance and aligns family expectations with palliative care goals. Simultaneously, establishing peer support networks for rural doctors is crucial for sustaining their psychological well-being, reinforcing their sense of shared purpose (relatedness), and building resilience against the emotional challenges inherent in end-of-life care (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec27">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Limitations</title>
<p>This study had several limitations. First, its cross-sectional design limits causal inferences regarding the relationship between motivational factors and behavioral intentions. Second, although we aimed for a broad sample, the online survey format may have excluded older doctors who were less familiar with digital tools, potentially introducing selection bias. Third, despite checking for common method bias, our reliance on self-reported data is vulnerable to social desirability bias. Fourth, although guided by the Self-Determination Theory, measurement constraints prevented us from conducting a formal mediation analysis to validate the proposed psychological pathways statistically. Finally, the geographic focus on Guangxi Province may have affected the generalizability of our findings to other regions of China with different socioeconomic landscapes.</p>
<p>These limitations indicate clear opportunities for future research. To establish causality, longitudinal or experimental studies are required to trace how the SDT constructs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) influence long-term engagement in hospice care. To deepen contextual insights, mixed-method approaches combining surveys with qualitative interviews can richly capture the lived experiences and emotional challenges of rural doctors. Intervention studies are crucial for testing the effectiveness of training programs or new service models grounded in SDT-principles to bridge theory and practice. Finally, to assess broader relevance, comparative multiregional studies within China would help determine the generalizability of our findings and identify region-specific moderating factors in future studies.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec28">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study moves beyond documenting the knowledge gap to unravel the motivational anatomy of rural doctors&#x2019; engagement with hospice care. This demonstrates that willingness is not merely a function of individual compassion but is critically mediated by the work context, its structural fairness, resource availability, and alignment with professional identity. The application of Self-Determination Theory provides a powerful lens for understanding these dynamics. Therefore, enhancing rural hospice care in China requires a paradigm shift from asking for overburdened individuals to redesigning systems that actively support autonomy, competence, and relatedness. By addressing the economic, legal, and educational bottlenecks, policymakers can translate the latent willingness of Guangxi village doctors into sustainable, high-quality end-of-life care, serving as a model for other underdeveloped regions worldwide.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec29">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec30">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving humans were approved by Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec31">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>SL: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Conceptualization, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation. LJ: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Investigation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Data curation, Validation. ZL: Methodology, Supervision, Project administration, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Resources, Conceptualization.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec32">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec33">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec34">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">Seventh National Population Census Bulletin</collab></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). Available online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.gov.cn/guoqing/2021-05/13/content_5606149.htm" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.gov.cn/guoqing/2021-05/13/content_5606149.htm</ext-link> (Accessed November 23, 2025)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll2">National Healthcare Security Administration</collab></person-group>. 36 Items Including "Aeromedical Transport", "Palliative Care", and "Single Room Bed Fee for Hospitalization" Incorporated into the Guideline for the Establishment of Comprehensive Diagnostic Medical Service Price Items (Trial)[EB/OL]. (<year>2024</year>). Available online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2024/11/12/art_14_14650.html" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2024/11/12/art_14_14650.html</ext-link> (Accessed October 23, 2025).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ruochen</surname> <given-names>Sun</given-names></name></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <source>Research on the development issues and countermeasures of palliative Care Services in China from the perspective of "healthy China" [master's thesis, Hubei university]</source>. Wuhan: Hubei University. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.27130/d.cnki.ghubu.2024.000261</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Self-reported knowledge and difficulties towards palliative care among healthcare professionals in rural China: a cross-sectional study</article-title>. <source>BMC Palliat Care</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>37</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12904-025-01674-w</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leng</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jing</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nicholas</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Catastrophic health expenditure of cancer patients at the end-of-life: a retrospective observational study in China</article-title>. <source>BMC Palliat Care</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>18(1):43</volume>. <comment>Published 2019</comment>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12904-019-0426-5</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Differences in health-related quality of life and its associated factors among older adults in urban and rural areas</article-title>. <source>Risk Manag Healthc Policy</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>1447</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/RMHP.S373077</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35923554</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hanson</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Development of village doctors in China: financial compensation and health system support</article-title>. <source>Int J Equity Health</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>9</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12939-016-0505-7</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28666444</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>You</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Systematic and meta-based evaluation on job satisfaction of village doctors: an urgent need for solution issue</article-title>. <source>Front Med</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>856379</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmed.2022.856379</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36059843</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll3">Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft</collab></person-group>. S3-Leitlinie Palliativmedizin f&#x00FC;r Patienten mit einer nicht heilbaren Krebserkrankung. AWMF Registernummer 128. (<year>2015</year>). Available online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Leitlinien/Palliativmedizin/LL_Palliativmedizin_Langversion_1_1.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Leitlinien/Palliativmedizin/LL_Palliativmedizin_Langversion_1_1</ext-link> (Accessed July 5, 2019).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Artnak</surname> <given-names>KE</given-names></name> <name><surname>McGraw</surname> <given-names>RM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stanley</surname> <given-names>VF</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Health care accessibility for chronic illness management and end-of-life care: a view from rural America</article-title>. <source>J Law Med Ethics</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>39</volume>:<fpage>140</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00584.x</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arredondo</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Touchett</surname> <given-names>HN</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vincenti</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Watts</surname> <given-names>BV</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Current programs and incentives to overcome rural physician shortages in the United States: a narrative review</article-title>. <source>J Gen Intern Med</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>38</volume>:<fpage>916</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11606-023-08122-6</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abu-Odah</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Molassiotis</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Challenges on the provision of palliative care for patients with cancer in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of reviews</article-title>. <source>BMC Palliat Care</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>55</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12904-020-00558-5</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Triebner</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sonnauer</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rauch</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kersten</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rauch</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mestermann</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Promoting motivation and reducing stress in medical students by utilizing self-determination theory - a randomized controlled trial in practical psychiatry courses</article-title>. <source>BMC Med Educ</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>1177</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12909-024-06181-9</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiaohan</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhiqun</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Limei</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yifan</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shuijing</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yongxing</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Analysis of attitudes and influencing factors towards palliative care among medical staff in Shanghai</article-title>. <source>Chinese J General Pract</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>556</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3760/cma.j.cn114798-20200815-00908</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Awareness and attitude toward hospice and palliative care among healthcare professionals in a tertiary Hospital in China</article-title>. <source>Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>35</volume>:<fpage>60</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5152/pcp.2025.24924</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Community nurses' willingness to implement advance care planning (ACP) and their attitudes toward death: current status and correlation analysis</article-title>. <source>Front Med</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>1573314</fpage><comment>. Published 2025 Jun 6</comment>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmed.2025.1573314</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Current status and job satisfaction of village doctors in western China</article-title>. <source>Medicine</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>98</volume>:<fpage>e16693</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/MD.0000000000016693</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bian</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The influence of personality, alexithymia and work engagement on burnout among village doctors in China: a cross-sectional study</article-title>. <source>BMC Public Health</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>1507</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12889-021-11544-8</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lian</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Improving rural doctors' professional competence: effectiveness analysis of China's village doctors policy. Front</article-title>. <source>Public Health</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>1591633</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpubh.2025.1591633</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maitland</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nicholas</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Loban</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haggerty</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Comparison of patient perceived primary care quality in public clinics, public hospitals and private clinics in rural China</article-title>. <source>Int J Equity Health</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>176</fpage>. <comment>Published 2017 Oct 3</comment>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12939-017-0672-1</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll4">Rural and Urban Communities Require Different Approaches to Health Care</collab></person-group>. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (<year>2021</year>). Available online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/137678b990c79d3b9081bcc1e1262c29/PTAC-Mar-3-Meeting-Minutes.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/137678b990c79d3b9081bcc1e1262c29/PTAC-Mar-3-Meeting-Minutes.pdf</ext-link> (Accessed November 19, 2025).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Antonacci</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barrie</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baxter</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mirabella</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marfoli</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casale</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Gaps in hospice and palliative care research: a scoping review of the north American literature</article-title>. <source>J Aging Res</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>2020</volume>:<fpage>3921245</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2020/3921245</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mastroianni</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Piredda</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taboga</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mirabella</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marfoli</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casale</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Frommelt attitudes toward Care of the Dying Scale Form B: psychometric testing of the Italian version for students</article-title>. <source>Omega</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>70</volume>:<fpage>227</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0030222815568944</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dan</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Analysis of multiple practical paths for palliative Care in Rural Areas</article-title>. <source>Med Philos</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>43</volume>:<fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2022.04.08</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Analysis of the characteristics, efficiency, and influencing factors of third-party mediation mechanisms for resolving medical disputes in public hospitals in China</article-title>. <source>BMC Public Health</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>1823</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12889-024-19366-0</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wierzchowski</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iwanowska</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stadnicze&#x0144;k</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kapranov</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The deconstruction of modern mortality of death: an analysis through law, war, and social philosophy</article-title>. <source>J Modern Sci</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>60</volume>:<fpage>928</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13166/jms/197288</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>GR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>WY</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Mediating effect of meaning in life on death anxiety and attitude toward palliative care among undergraduate nursing students</article-title>. <source>BMC Palliat Care</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>23</volume>:<fpage>139</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12904-024-01472-w</pub-id>, <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38840188</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1454096/overview">Carlos Laranjeira</ext-link>, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Portugal</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3157595/overview">Made Indra Wijaya</ext-link>, University of Warmadewa, Indonesia</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3180611/overview">Hesen Li</ext-link>, Shenyang Aerospace University, China</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>