Front. Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health
Front. Public Health
2296-2565
Frontiers Media S.A.
10.3389/fpubh.2025.1728911
Public Health
Correction
Correction: Interparental conflict and adolescents' suicidal ideation: life satisfaction as a mediator and teacher support as a moderator
Frontiers Production Office
*
Frontiers Media SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
*Correspondence: Frontiers Production Office production.office@frontiersin.org
27
10
2025
2025
13
1728911
20
10
2025
20
10
2025
Copyright © 2025 Frontiers Production Office.
2025
Frontiers Production Office
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
A Correction on Interparental conflict and adolescents' suicidal ideation: life satisfaction as a mediator and teacher support as a moderator by Xu, L., She, Z., and Xu, B. (2025). Front. Public Health 13:1637974. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1637974
interparental conflict
life satisfaction
teacher support
suicidal ideation
adolescents
section-at-acceptance
Public Mental Health
In the Abstract, corrections to the values in the Results paragraph of the abstract were not implemented. This has been corrected to read:
“Results: The mediation analysis showed that a significant indirect relationship between interparental conflict and suicidal ideation, mediated by life satisfaction (β = 0.02, 95% CI [0.01, 0.04]). The moderation analysis revealed that teacher support moderated the relationship between life satisfaction and suicidal ideation (β = −0.03, p < 0.01). The relationship between life satisfaction and suicidal ideation was significant for adolescents who perceived high teacher support (β = −0.08, 95% CI [−0.12, −0.04]) but not for those who perceived low teacher support (β = −0.01, 95% CI [−0.05, 0.03]).”
The original version of this article has been updated.