<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Public Health</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Public Health</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Public Health</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-2565</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpubh.2025.1654268</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Nurses&#x00027; knowledge, attitude, and practice toward the sexual health of breast cancer patients</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>Yingjie</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3098358"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Dan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Qiannan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>Xin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x00026; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Lingling</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &#x00026; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Oncology Department, Nanjing Luhe People&#x00027;s Hospital, Yangzhou University, Nanjing</institution>, <city>Jiangsu</city>, <country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Nursing Department, Nanjing Luhe People&#x00027;s Hospital, Yangzhou University, Nanjing</institution>, <city>Jiangsu</city>, <country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>&#x0002A;</label>Correspondence: Dan Zhao, <email xlink:href="mailto:839189889@qq.com">839189889@qq.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-12-15">
<day>15</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1654268</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>26</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>19</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2025 Gong, Zhao, Ye, Shao and Tang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Gong, Zhao, Ye, Shao and Tang</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2025-12-15">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Background</title>
<p>This study explores the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding the sexual health of breast cancer patients among nurses in Nanjing, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Conducted from June to July 2023 across six hospitals, this web-based cross-sectional study utilized a self-administered questionnaire, resulting in 252 valid responses, predominantly from female nurses (98.41%).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>The mean scores indicated inadequate knowledge (8.82 &#x000B1; 5.33), a positive attitude (38.43 &#x000B1; 5.23), and inactive practice (27.75 &#x000B1; 6.68) regarding patients&#x00027; sexual health. Multivariate logistic regression identified that the lack of training on breast cancer sexual health was significantly associated with lower knowledge (OR = 0.31, <italic>p</italic> = 0.001), while job satisfaction correlated positively with knowledge levels (OR = 1.28, <italic>p</italic> = 0.018). Age (OR = 1.13, <italic>p</italic> = 0.001) and attitude (OR = 1.22, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001) were linked to higher levels of practice. Structural equation modeling revealed that knowledge significantly positively influenced attitude (<italic>&#x003B2;</italic> = 0.493, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001), and both knowledge and attitude directly affected practice (<italic>&#x003B2;</italic> = 0.563 and <italic>&#x003B2;</italic> = 0.897 respectively, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Overall, nurses demonstrated a need for improved knowledge and active practices concerning the sexual health of breast cancer patients.</p>
</sec></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>knowledge</kwd>
<kwd>attitude and practice</kwd>
<kwd>sexual health</kwd>
<kwd>breast cancer</kwd>
<kwd>cross-sectional study</kwd>
<kwd>structural equation modeling</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
  <funding-statement>The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="1"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="22"/>
<page-count count="9"/>
<word-count count="5191"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Public Health Education and Promotion</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Breast cancer represents a significant health burden in China, with approximately 357,200 new cases in 2022, ranking as the second most common cancer and fifth leading cause of cancer-related mortality among Chinese women (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>). Beyond its physical impact, breast cancer treatment also substantially affects young women&#x00027;s physical appearance, sexual and reproductive functioning, and employment opportunities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>).</p>
<p>A balanced sexual life constitutes an integral component of overall well-being, but many breast cancer treatments, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and surgical interventions, can significantly impair patients&#x00027; sexual quality of life, with approximately 60% of patients experiencing diminished sexual satisfaction following treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>). This disruption occurs primarily due to treatment-induced physiological changes such as hormonal fluctuations, vaginal dryness, pain during intercourse, reduced libido, and loss of breast sensation or physical disfigurement from surgeries like mastectomy or lumpectomy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>). These physiological factors, coupled with psychological sequelae including altered body image, anxiety, and depression, severely affect patients&#x00027; sexual self-confidence, femininity, and intimacy with partners (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>).</p>
<p>Despite these significant impacts, sexual health remains largely neglected in cancer care protocols in China, with effective communication between patients and doctors about sexuality being infrequent, despite 68% of breast cancer patients expressing a desire for information on this topic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>). Patients often hesitate to initiate these discussions, highlighting the crucial role nurses play in initiating open dialogues and providing empathetic, professional guidance on sexual health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). Therefore, comprehensive training and positive attitudes among nurses are essential to effectively support breast cancer patients in addressing their sexual well-being. The Knowledge-Attitude-Practice (KAP) model represents one of the most widely employed theoretical frameworks for studying the behaviors of healthcare professionals. In the realm of health literacy, it operates on the premise that knowledge functions as a catalyst, positively shaping attitude, which in turn guides practice. According to the KAP theory, the process of altering human behavior unfolds across three distinct stages: the acquisition of knowledge, the cultivation of attitude and beliefs, and the subsequent formation of practice and behaviors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>). Within clinical nursing practice, nurses&#x00027; knowledge and attitudes directly influence their interactions with patients. Specifically, nurses equipped with comprehensive knowledge and positive attitudes toward sexual health are more likely to proactively address patients&#x00027; concerns, provide evidence-based information, and foster open communication, thereby improving patients&#x00027; overall sexual health outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>). In the context of breast cancer sexual health, nurses play a crucial role by disseminating accurate information and addressing patients&#x00027; misconceptions and concerns.</p>
<p>Globally, studies on breast cancer patients&#x00027; sexual health have primarily focused on the psychological distress, body image concerns, relationship difficulties, and barriers to communication between patients and healthcare providers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). However, few have specifically examined nurses&#x00027; competencies or roles in addressing these issues, particularly within the Chinese healthcare context. Given the conservative attitudes toward sexual health discussions in Chinese culture, nurses may face greater challenges in providing effective patient support. It is essential to explore Chinese nurses&#x00027; knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding breast cancer patients&#x00027; sexual health. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the KAP toward the sexual health of breast cancer patients among nurses.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Study design and participants</title>
<p>This web-based cross-sectional study was conducted between June 2023 and July 2023, across six hospitals of Nanjing, China (Nanjing Luhe People&#x00027;s Hospital, Nanjing Luhe Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital, Nanjing Gaochun People&#x00027;s Hospital, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University (Jiangbei) and Nanjing Pukou People&#x00027;s Hospital) and nurses were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were: (1) nursing staff from oncology, radiotherapy, general surgery (including breast surgery), thyroid and breast surgery, and breast surgery departments, (2) aged between 18 and 60 years. Exclusion criteria were: (1) do not agree to participate in this study. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Nanjing Luhe People&#x00027;s Hospital (LHLL2021004) and informed consent was obtained from the participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Questionnaire</title>
<p>This questionnaire was developed based on the relevant literature as the foundational framework (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>). Subsequently, the initial design underwent refinements reviewed by six associate senior experts. A pilot test, involving 29 samples, was conducted to assess the questionnaire&#x00027;s reliability, yielding a reliability coefficient (Cronbach&#x00027;s &#x003B1; =0.883).</p>
<p>The final questionnaire in Chinese (a version translated into English was attached as an Appendix) composed four distinct sections. The first section covered demographic characteristics such as age, gender, education, nature of employing institution, job title, department, clinical work experience, involvement with breast cancer patients, relevant training received, and job satisfaction. Job satisfaction was evaluated by 0&#x02013;10 points, 0 points indicated very dissatisfied, 10 points indicated very satisfied. The knowledge dimension comprised a total of 11 questions, with a scoring system assigning 2 points for well known, 1 point for partly known, and 0 points for unknown, resulting in a score range of 0&#x02013;22. The attitude dimension comprised 10 questions and employed a five-point Likert scale, ranging from &#x0201C;strongly agree&#x0201D; (5 points) to &#x0201C;strongly disagree&#x0201D; (1 point), yielding a score range of 10&#x02013;50. The practice dimension consisted of 8 questions, also employing a five-point Likert scale, spanning from &#x0201C;always/very consistent&#x0201D; (5 points) to &#x0201C;never/very inconsistent&#x0201D; (1 point), with a score range of 8&#x02013;40.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Quality control and distribution process</title>
<p>An electronic questionnaire was created using the online platform Sojump, with a corresponding QR code supplied for convenient access to the survey. Participants had the option to either scan the QR code via WeChat or follow the provided link to access and complete the questionnaire. To uphold data quality and ensure comprehensive responses, a one-submission-per-IP address restriction was implemented, and all questionnaire items were designated as mandatory. Participants were guaranteed anonymity during the survey process.</p>
<p>The research team, which included three investigators trained as research assistants responsible for questionnaire promotion and distribution, diligently examined all submissions for completeness, internal consistency, and logical coherence. Additionally, questionnaires completed in under 60 s, those containing logical errors, or those with uniform responses across all items were categorized as invalid.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The sample size was determined to be 5&#x02013;10 times the number of questionnaire items (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>), which, in this case, was 29 independent variables. Consequently, the minimum required sample size was calculated to be 145. To account for a potential 5% invalidity rate among survey questionnaires, a minimum of 153 participants were needed to ensure adequate valid responses.</p>
<p>Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). Quantitative variables were described using mean &#x000B1; standard deviation (SD), and between-group comparisons were performed using <italic>t</italic>-tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Categorical variables were presented as <italic>n</italic> (%). Spearman correlation analysis was employed to assess the correlations between knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) scores. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, 70% score distribution of the total score was used as the cut-off value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). Variables in univariate logistic regression analysis with <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05 were enrolled in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Hypotheses were validated using structural equation modeling (SEM): (1) knowledge had impacts on attitude; (2) knowledge had impacts on practice; (3) attitude had impacts on practice. Two-sided <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05 were considered statistically significant in this study.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<p>Initially, a total of 270 responses were collected, and these included two cases with a response time of less than 60 s, two cases of disagreement with informed consent, one case with an abnormal age (126 years old) and one case with a missing age, four cases of irrational responses, and 11 cases of questionnaires from doctors. Ultimately, 252 cases were retained, with a validity rate of 93.33%. Among them, 248 (98.41%) were female, 132 (52.38%) aged 21&#x02013;30 years, 196 (77.78%) held at least a Bachelor&#x00027;s degree, 223 (88.49%) were affiliated with Public Level 2 or above institutions, and 151 (59.92%) had a junior title (59.92%). Overall, in terms of departments, General Surgery/Thyroid and Breast Surgery/Breast Surgery constituted the largest group (121, 48.02%). 218 (86.51%) reported an experience in managing breast cancer patients and 169 (67.06%) had received training on breast cancer patient sexual health. The average job satisfaction score was 8.43 &#x000B1; 1.72 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Demographic information.</p></caption>
<table frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr style="background-color:&#x00023;919498;color:&#x00023;ffffff">
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Variables</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>N</italic> (%)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Knowledge, mean &#x000B1;SD</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Attitude, mean &#x000B1;SD</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Practice, mean &#x000B1;SD</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>N</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">252</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total score</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.82 &#x000B1; 5.33</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.43 &#x000B1; 5.23</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.75 &#x000B1; 6.68</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="8"><bold>Gender</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Male</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4(1.59)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.25 &#x000B1; 4.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.650</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38 &#x000B1; 4.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.838</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.25 &#x000B1; 2.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.970</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Female</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">248 (98.41)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.16 &#x000B1; 5.35</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.44 &#x000B1; 5.25</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.75 &#x000B1; 6.72</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="8"><bold>Age (years)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">21&#x02013;30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">132 (52.38)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.76 &#x000B1; 5.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.328</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.69 &#x000B1; 5.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.756</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.91 &#x000B1; 6.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">31&#x02013;40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">105 (41.67)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.67 &#x000B1; 5.66</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.06 &#x000B1; 5.15</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.69 &#x000B1; 6.93</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02265;41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15 (5.95)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.33 &#x000B1; 5.05</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.73 &#x000B1; 4.65</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">25 &#x000B1; 6.38</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="8"><bold>Education</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">High school/college/associate degree</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56 (22.22)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.62 &#x000B1; 5.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.325</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40 &#x000B1; 5.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.021</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.82 &#x000B1; 5.90</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bachelor&#x00027;s degree and above</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">196 (77.78)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.33 &#x000B1; 5.30</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.98 &#x000B1; 5.06</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.16 &#x000B1; 6.78</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="8"><bold>Nature of employing institution</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Other</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29 (11.51)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.55 &#x000B1; 5.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.105</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.65 &#x000B1; 5.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.027</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.55 &#x000B1; 6.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.291</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Secondary or above</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">223 (88.49)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.39 &#x000B1; 5.26</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.66 &#x000B1; 5.22</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.91 &#x000B1; 6.74</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="8"><bold>Job title</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Junior</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">151 (59.92)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.68 &#x000B1; 5.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.071</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.39 &#x000B1; 5.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.925</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.84 &#x000B1; 6.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.006</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Intermediate</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90 (35.71)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.75 &#x000B1; 5.59</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.45 &#x000B1; 5.16</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.1 &#x000B1; 6.88</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Associate/senior</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11 (4.37)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.27 &#x000B1; 3.95</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.90 &#x000B1; 4.74</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.45 &#x000B1; 5.69</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="8"><bold>Department</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Oncology</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">105 (41.67)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.73 &#x000B1; 5.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.400</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.75 &#x000B1; 5.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.258</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.54 &#x000B1; 6.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.794</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">General surgery/thyroid and breast surgery/breast surgery</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">121 (48.02)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.70 &#x000B1; 5.42</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.96 &#x000B1; 4.86</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.02 &#x000B1; 6.38</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Radiotherapy</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26 (10.32)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.53 &#x000B1; 5.61</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">39.34 &#x000B1; 5.38</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.38 &#x000B1; 7.89</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="8"><bold>Clinical work experience (years)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003C; 3 years</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83 (32.94)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.76 &#x000B1; 4.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.023</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.68 &#x000B1; 5.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.505</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.66 &#x000B1; 4.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02265;3 but &#x0003C; 5 years</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75 (29.76)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.60 &#x000B1; 4.96</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">39.21 &#x000B1; 5.19</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.93 &#x000B1; 6.08</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02265;5 but &#x0003C; 10 years</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94 (37.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.37 &#x000B1; 5.81</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.54 &#x000B1; 5.43</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.06 &#x000B1; 7.41</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02265;10 years</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83(32.94)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.06 &#x000B1; 5.13</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.74 &#x000B1; 5.11</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.35 &#x000B1; 6.63</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="8"><bold>Involvement with breast cancer patients</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">218 (86.51)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.36 &#x000B1; 5.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.204</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.39 &#x000B1; 5.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.657</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.59 &#x000B1; 6.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.287</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34 (13.49)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.97 &#x000B1; 5.48</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.67 &#x000B1; 5.34</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.82 &#x000B1; 5.85</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="8"><bold>Received training on breast cancer patient sexual health</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">169 (67.06)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.18 &#x000B1; 5.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.78 &#x000B1; 5.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.176</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.64 &#x000B1; 6.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83 (32.94)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.13 &#x000B1; 4.61</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.72 &#x000B1; 5.27</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.95 &#x000B1; 6.15</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" ><bold>Job satisfaction (score) (M</bold> <bold>&#x000B1;SD)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.43 &#x000B1; 1.72</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr></tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The mean knowledge, attitude and practice scores were 8.82 &#x000B1; 5.33 (possible range: 0&#x02013;22), 38.43 &#x000B1; 5.23 (possible range: 10&#x02013;50), and 27.75 &#x000B1; 6.68 (possible range: 8&#x02013;40), respectively. Participants in the age group of 21&#x02013;30 years were more likely to have a proactive practice (<italic>p</italic> = 0.010). Individuals with Bachelor&#x00027;s degrees and above were more likely to exhibit positive attitude (<italic>p</italic> = 0.021) and proactive practice (<italic>p</italic> = 0.010) toward breast cancer care. Those working in public 2 or above were more likely to have positive attitude (<italic>p</italic> = 0.027). Clinical work experience also played a significant role, with participants having less than 3 years of work experience being more likely to have proactive practice (<italic>p</italic> = 0.001), but those with more than 10 years of work experience being more likely to have adequate knowledge (<italic>p</italic> = 0.023) and proactive practice (<italic>p</italic> = 0.001). Furthermore, those who received training on breast cancer patient sexual health were more likely to have adequate knowledge (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001) and proactive practice (<italic>p</italic> = 0.001; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<p>The distribution of knowledge dimensions revealed that the highest proportion of participants (46.43%) were familiar with the recommendation for physical barrier contraception over hormonal methods in breast cancer patients (K5), followed by awareness of the benefits of moderate sexual activity paired with contraceptive guidance (K4, 43.65%), and recognition of treatment-related factors (endocrine therapy, body image issues, anxiety/depression) impacting sexual health (K3, 39.29%; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>).</p>
<p>A consensus emerged in the attitude dimension, with 87.7% of respondents (48.02% strongly agreeing, 39.68% agreeing) affirming the significance of sexual health to overall well-being (A1). Most participants supported societal guidance on sexual health aligned with moral beliefs (A2, 67.86% strongly agreed, 23.81% agreed) and emphasized the necessity for healthcare providers to address sexual health during follow-ups (A4, 50.4% strongly agreed, 36.51% agreed). Additionally, 84.12% endorsed using interviews/questionnaires to assess sexual health (A5, 35.71% strongly agreed, 48.41% agreed), while 88.89% highlighted the importance of post-treatment sexual health education (A6, 51.19% strongly agreed, 37.7% agreed; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 2</xref>).</p>
<p>In practice dimension, 27.78% of healthcare providers frequently assessed patients&#x00027; sexual health via interviews/questionnaires (P1), while 25.4% routinely delivered sexual health education (P2). Notably, 78.97% provided preoperative/postoperative breast reconstruction guidance to patients with breast loss (P4). Additionally, 36.9% engaged patients&#x00027; spouses in addressing sexual health concerns (P6), and 37.7% integrated sexual health considerations into individualized treatment plans (P7). A majority (64.68%) actively updated their knowledge on cancer-related sexual health research (P8; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 3</xref>).</p>
<p>Correlation analysis showed that significant positive correlations were observed between knowledge and attitude (r = 0.3035, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001), knowledge and practice (<italic>r</italic> = 0.5078, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001), as well as attitude and practice (<italic>r</italic> = 0.3808, <italic>p</italic> = 0.004; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 4</xref>).</p>
<p>Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the absence of training on breast cancer patient sexual health (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15&#x02013;0.64, <italic>p</italic> = 0.001) and job satisfaction (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.04&#x02013;1.57, <italic>p</italic> = 0.018) were independently associated with adequate Knowledge. Meanwhile, attitude (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.13&#x02013;1.32, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001) and age (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05&#x02013;1.22, <italic>p</italic> = 0.001) were independently associated with positive practice (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Tables 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Univariate analysis of knowledge and practice.</p></caption>
<table frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr style="background-color:&#x00023;919498;color:&#x00023;ffffff">
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Variables</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2"><bold>Knowledge</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2"><bold>Practice</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>OR (95% CI)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>p</bold></italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>OR (95% CI)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>p</bold></italic></td>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Knowledge</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.22 (1.15&#x02013;1.30)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Attitude</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.19 (1.13&#x02013;1.26)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Gender</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Male</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">(empty)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Female</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.45 (0.06&#x02013;3.25)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.429</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(omitted)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Age (years)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">21&#x02013;30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">31&#x02013;40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.77 (1.01&#x02013;3.08)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.043</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.56 (0.31&#x02013;1.00)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.051</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02265;41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.44 (0.45&#x02013;4.51)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.531</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27 (0.06&#x02013;1.28)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.101</td>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Education</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">High school/college/associate degree</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bachelor&#x00027;s degree and above</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.48 (0.75&#x02013;2.92)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.247</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.50 (0.27&#x02013;0.93)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.031</td>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Nature of employing unit</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Other</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Public level 2 or above</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.22 (0.51&#x02013;2.90)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.643</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.10 (0.46&#x02013;2.61)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.823</td>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Job title</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Junior</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Intermediate</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.89 (1.07&#x02013;3.31)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.026</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52 (0.29&#x02013;0.96)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.037</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Associate/senior</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.56 (1.03&#x02013;12.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.045</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.18 (0.02&#x02013;1.48)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.112</td>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Department</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Oncology</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">General surgery/thyroid and breast Surgery/breast surgery</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.59 (0.89&#x02013;2.82)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.112</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.81 (0.46&#x02013;1.45)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.493</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Radiotherapy</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.52 (0.61&#x02013;3.83)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.365</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.96 (0.38&#x02013;2.45)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.948</td>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Clinical work experience (years)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003C; 3 years</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02265;3 but &#x0003C; 5 years</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.69 (0.24&#x02013;1.95)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.488</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.06 (0.43&#x02013;2.61)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.898</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02265;5 but &#x0003C; 10 years</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93 (0.41&#x02013;2.08)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.67 (0.31&#x02013;1.44)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.313</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02265;10 years</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.74 (0.83&#x02013;3.66)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.142</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.44 (0.20&#x02013;0.93)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.034</td>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Involvement with breast cancer patients</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63 (0.27&#x02013;1.47)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.294</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00 (0.45&#x02013;2.21)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.995</td>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Received training on breast cancer patient sexual health</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">REF.</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.25 (0.12&#x02013;0.51)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.41 (0.21&#x02013;0.78)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Job satisfaction (score) (M</bold> <bold>&#x000B1;SD)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.35 (1.11&#x02013;1.64)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.49 (1.20&#x02013;1.86)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x0003C; 0.001</td>
</tr></tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Multivariate analysis of knowledge and practice.</p></caption>
<table frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr style="background-color:&#x00023;919498;color:&#x00023;ffffff">
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Variables</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><bold>Knowledge</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><bold>Practice</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>OR (95% CI)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic><bold>p</bold></italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>OR (95% CI)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic><bold>p</bold></italic></td>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Knowledge</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Attitude</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.22 (1.13&#x02013;1.32)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003C; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Age (years)</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.13 (1.05&#x02013;1.22)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">21&#x02013;30</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">REF.</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">31&#x02013;40</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.00 (0.39&#x02013;2.53)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.988</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02265;41</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.52 (0.10&#x02013;2.49)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.415</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Education</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">High school/college/associate degree</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">REF.</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bachelor&#x00027;s degree and above</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.53 (0.19&#x02013;1.41)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.207</td>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Job title</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Junior</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">REF.</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">REF.</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Intermediate</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.00 (0.78&#x02013;5.10)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.143</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.44 (0.12&#x02013;1.52)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.196</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Associate/senior</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.75 (0.75&#x02013;18.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.106</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.11 (0.00&#x02013;1.38)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.088</td>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Clinical work experience (years)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x0003C; 3 years</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">REF.</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02265;3 but &#x0003C; 5 years</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.21 (0.66&#x02013;7.33)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.193</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02265;5 but &#x0003C; 10 years</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.40 (0.45&#x02013;4.33)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.555</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02265;10 years</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.98 (0.21&#x02013;4.63)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.987</td>
</tr>
<tr style="background-color:#dee1e1">
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Received training on breast cancer patient sexual health</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">REF.</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">REF.</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.31 (0.15&#x02013;0.64)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.62 (0.28&#x02013;1.40)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.256</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Job satisfaction (score) (M</bold> <bold>&#x000B1;SD)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.28 (1.04&#x02013;1.57)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.018</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.21 (0.94&#x02013;1.56)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.126</td>
</tr></tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The SEM included three latent variables, knowledge, attitude, and practice, and their corresponding observed indicators (K1&#x02013;K11, A1&#x02013;A10, and P1&#x02013;P8, respectively). All observed variables loaded significantly onto their respective latent constructs. The model also includes measurement error terms for each observed variable (e1&#x02013;e31), as well as several covariances among specific error terms within the Knowledge dimension (e.g., between e4 and e5, e7 and e8, and e8 and e9), indicating shared variance among certain items. The structural paths show that knowledge has a direct positive effect on attitude (<italic>&#x003B2;</italic> = 0.493) and practice (<italic>&#x003B2;</italic> = 0.563), while attitude exerts the strongest direct influence on practice (<italic>&#x003B2;</italic> = 0.897). Overall, the SEM visually demonstrates the interrelationships among the three KAP components and supports the theoretical framework tested in this study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 5</xref>). The SEM demonstrate a highly favorable model fit indices, suggesting a well-fitting model (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table 6</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="F1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>SEM model: the SEM included three latent variables, knowledge, attitude, and practice, and their corresponding observed indicators (K1&#x02013;K11, A1&#x02013;A10, and P1&#x02013;P8, respectively). All observed variables loaded significantly onto their respective latent constructs. The model also includes measurement error terms for each observed variable (e1&#x02013;e31), as well as several covariances among specific error terms within the knowledge dimension (e.g., between e4 and e5, e7 and e8, and e8 and e9), indicating shared variance among certain items. The structural paths show that knowledge has a direct positive effect on attitude (<italic>&#x003B2;</italic> = 0.493), and Practice (<italic>&#x003B2;</italic> = 0.563), while attitude exerts the strongest direct influence on Practice (<italic>&#x003B2;</italic> = 0.897). Overall, the SEM visually demonstrates the interrelationships among the three KAP components and supports the theoretical framework tested in this study.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpubh-13-1654268-g0001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">A structural equation model diagram depicting the relationships between three latent variables: Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice. Each latent variable is connected to several observed variables. Arrows indicate causal paths with numerical coefficients representing path strengths. Error terms (e1 to e31) are shown as circles connected to observed variables, also with numerical values. Knowledge is linked to factors K1 to K11, Attitude to A1 to A10, and Practice to P1 to P8. Numerical values next to arrows reflect strengths and correlations between variables. The diagram illustrates the hypothesized interactions within the model.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Nurses demonstrated inadequate knowledge, positive attitude, and inactive practice toward the sexual health of breast cancer patients. To improve patient care in this regard, healthcare institutions should provide specialized training, create a supportive environment, promote positive attitude, offer age-specific training, encourage interdisciplinary collaboration, and conduct regular assessments for nurses.</p>
<p>Previous international studies on breast cancer patients&#x00027; sexual health have indicated that nurses commonly exhibit knowledge gaps and inconsistent clinical practices in addressing sexual concerns, partly due to insufficient training and discomfort with the topic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). In China, limited research has revealed similar findings, with nurses often reluctant to discuss sexual health issues openly due to traditional cultural norms and embarrassment surrounding sexuality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). Such studies emphasize the need for targeted educational interventions and culturally sensitive training tailored to Chinese nurses. Our study contributes to this field by specifically examining Chinese nurses&#x00027; KAP toward breast cancer patients&#x00027; sexual health, thereby highlighting specific areas for intervention within the Chinese healthcare context. The regression analysis identified several independent predictors influencing nurses&#x00027; knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Specifically, nurses with at least a Bachelor&#x00027;s degree demonstrated more positive attitudes and proactive practices, suggesting the value of integrating sexual health education into healthcare curricula (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). Clinical experience demonstrated a nuanced impact, with less-experienced professionals displaying greater proactive practice, while their more experienced counterparts exhibit higher knowledge levels and proactive practice, emphasizing the potential benefits of collaboration between these groups. Moreover, specialized training and higher job satisfaction were positively associated with nurses&#x00027; knowledge, emphasizing the need for targeted education and a supportive working environment. Younger age and positive attitudes were independently linked to proactive practice, highlighting the potential for leveraging younger nurses&#x00027; innovative perspectives and enhancing attitudes through comprehensive educational initiatives to ultimately improve patient care (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>).</p>
<p>The survey results highlight that a majority of respondents within the healthcare community acknowledge the significance of sexual health in breast cancer care, recognizing its impact on overall human health and the quality of life of breast cancer survivors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>). However, there exists a divergence of opinions among some respondents toward whether sexual behavior should be considered a private matter, indicating a need for ongoing discussion and consensus-building within the healthcare community. To bridge these gaps, it is imperative to facilitate an open dialogue and establish guidelines for approaching this sensitive topic when communicating with patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>). Furthermore, the study indicates variations in healthcare providers&#x00027; knowledge levels across different dimensions of sexual health in breast cancer care. While some aspects, such as the use of physical barrier contraception methods and the importance of moderate sexual activity, are well-understood, uncertainty prevails in areas like the use of assessment tools and the potential impact of certain medications on sexual function. This underscores the importance of targeted training and education to ensure that healthcare providers are equipped to comprehensively address sexual health concerns with breast cancer patients. The findings also reveal that while some healthcare providers do employ methods to assess patients&#x00027; sexual health and provide relevant education, there is room for improvement in the practice. Only a minority consistently inform patients about potential impacts on sexual function and offer guidance within treatment plans. Additionally, a small percentage proactively initiate discussions about sexual health, even when patients haven&#x00027;t broached the topic themselves. This highlights an opportunity for the development of training programs and guidelines aimed at encouraging healthcare providers to take a more proactive role in addressing sexual health concerns with breast cancer patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>).</p>
<p>The correlation analysis unveiled robust positive associations between knowledge and attitude, knowledge and practice, as well as attitude and practice within the cohort of healthcare providers. This implies that individuals with elevated levels of knowledge tend to manifest more favorable attitude and exhibit more proactive practice in the context of breast cancer care. Hence, the promotion of knowledge acquisition among healthcare providers can potentially trigger a ripple effect, subsequently enhancing their attitude and practice, ultimately translating into improved care outcomes for breast cancer patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>).</p>
<p>The SEM results provide a comprehensive perspective on the intricate relationships among knowledge, attitude, and practice in the context of breast cancer care. Notably, it was observed that knowledge exerts a direct and statistically significant influence on attitude, while both knowledge and attitude independently wield direct and significant effects on practice. In essence, the SEM findings affirm that knowledge serves as a linchpin for facilitating comprehensive sexual health care for breast cancer patients, highlighting its overarching importance in shaping healthcare providers&#x00027; attitude and practice in this critical domain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>).</p>
<p>This study had several limitations. Firstly, this study&#x00027;s reliance on a web-based self-administered questionnaire raises concerns about potential sampling bias, as it may disproportionately include participants with better internet access and technological proficiency. Secondly, self-reported data collection introduces the possibility of social desirability bias, potentially leading participants to provide responses they deem socially acceptable rather than reflecting their true KAP. Lastly, the cross-sectional design employed restricts the ability to establish causal relationships or track changes in nurses&#x00027; knowledge, attitude, and practice over time.</p>
<p>In conclusion, nurses had inadequate knowledge, positive attitude, and inactive practice toward the sexual health of breast cancer patients. Given the influence of Chinese cultural sensitivities on attitudes toward sexuality, targeted and culturally adapted training programs are crucial. Healthcare institutions should therefore prioritize comprehensive sexual health training, enhance supportive environments, and foster positive attitudes among nurses, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s5">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in this article/<xref ref-type="sec" rid="SM1">Supplementary material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="s6">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethic Committee of Nanjing Luhe People&#x00027;s Hospital (LHLL2021004). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YG: Conceptualization, Writing &#x02013; original draft. DZ: Formal analysis, Writing &#x02013; original draft. QY: Writing &#x02013; original draft, Methodology. XS: Project administration, Writing &#x02013; review &#x00026; editing. LT: Writing &#x02013; review &#x00026; editing, Formal analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s9">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x00027;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s11">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1654268/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1654268/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Supplementary_file_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lei</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years of female breast cancer in China, 2022</article-title>. <source>Chin Med J (Engl)</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>137</volume>:<fpage>2429</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>36</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/CM9.0000000000003278</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sim-Sim</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aaberg</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x000F3;mez-Cantarino</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dias</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caldeira</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soto-Fernandez</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Sexual quality of life-female (SQoL-F): cultural adaptation and validation of European Portuguese version</article-title>. <source>Healthcare (Basel)</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>255</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/healthcare10020255</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brajkovic</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sladic</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kopila&#x00161;</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Sexual quality of life in women with breast cancer</article-title>. <source>Health Psychol Res.</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>24512</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52965/001c.24512</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>CP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>TF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Snyder</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dodson</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deshmukh</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>Newman</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Breast cancer survivorship and sexual dysfunction: a population-based cohort study</article-title>. <source>Breast Cancer Res Treat</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>200</volume>:<fpage>103</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10549-023-06953-9</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Link</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grabenhorst</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lynn</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Low sexual desire in breast cancer survivors and patients: a review</article-title>. <source>Sex Med Rev.</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>367</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>75</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sxmr.2022.02.001</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xin</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Low expression of DDX60 gene might associate with the radiosensitivity for patients with breast cancer</article-title>. <source>J Oncol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>2020</volume>:<fpage>8309492</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2020/8309492</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ten</surname> <given-names>Ham-Baloyi W</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Nurses&#x00027; roles in changing practice through implementing best practices: a systematic review</article-title>. <source>Health SA.</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>1776</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4102/hsag.v27i0.1776</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iddrisu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aziato</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dedey</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Psychological and physical effects of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment on young Ghanaian women: a qualitative study</article-title>. <source>BMC Psychiatry.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>353</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12888-020-02760-4</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feringa</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Swardt</surname> <given-names>HC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Havenga</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Registered nurses&#x00027; knowledge, attitude, practice and regulation regarding their scope of practice: a literature review</article-title>. <source>Int J Afr Nurs Sci.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>87</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>97</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijans.2018.04.001</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Corey</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smania</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spotts</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andersen</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Young women with breast cancer: treatment, care, and nursing implications</article-title>. <source>Clin J Oncol Nurs.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>139</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>47</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1188/20.CJON.139-147</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Albers</surname> <given-names>LF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Palacios</surname> <given-names>LAG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pelger</surname> <given-names>RCM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elzevier</surname> <given-names>HW</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Can the provision of sexual healthcare for oncology patients be improved? A literature review of educational interventions for healthcare professionals</article-title>. <source>J Cancer Surviv.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>858</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>66</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11764-020-00898-4</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The sample size estimation in quantitative nursing research</article-title>. <source>Chin J Nurs.</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>45</volume>:<fpage>378</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2010.04.037</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Elbeddini</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>To</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tayefehchamani</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>CX</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Importance of medication reconciliation in cancer patients</article-title>. <source>J Pharm Policy Pract.</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>98</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40545-021-00379-8</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fennell</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grant</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Discussing sexuality in health care: a systematic review</article-title>. <source>J Clin Nurs.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<fpage>3065</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>76</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jocn.14900</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kennedy</surname> <given-names>SKF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mekhaeil</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jolfaei</surname> <given-names>NA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>HCY</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>AW</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Sexual health after breast cancer: a clinical practice review</article-title>. <source>Ann Palliat Med</source>. (<year>2024</year>)<volume>13</volume>:<fpage>1281</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>90</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21037/apm-24-77</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pei</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Oncology nurses&#x00027; and oncologists&#x00027; experience of addressing sexual health concerns in breast cancer patients: a qualitative study</article-title>. <source>Eur J Oncol Nurs.</source> (<year>2023</year>) <volume>63</volume>:<fpage>102286</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102286</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tanimoto</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ozaki</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Che</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>The relationship between sexual activity and sexual attitudes among breast cancer survivors in China</article-title>. <source>Cancer Med.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>3425</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>36</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cam4.2874</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Effects of stigma on the relationship between perceived social support and sexual satisfaction among breast cancer survivors</article-title>. <source>J Sex Med.</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>1002</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.03.617</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suryohusodo</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Knowledge, attitude, and practice assessment toward COVID-19 among communities in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia: a cross-sectional study</article-title>. <source>Front Public Health.</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>957630</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpubh.2022.957630</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stabile</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goldfarb</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baser</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goldfrank</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abu-Rustum</surname> <given-names>NR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barakat</surname> <given-names>RR</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Sexual health needs and educational intervention preferences for women with cancer</article-title>. <source>Breast Cancer Res Treat.</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>165</volume>:<fpage>77</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>84</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10549-017-4305-6</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>MY</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jang</surname> <given-names>MK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The experience of cancer-related fatigue, exercise and exercise adherence among women breast cancer survivors: insights from focus group interviews</article-title>. <source>J Clin Nurs.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>758</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>69</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jocn.15114</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22.</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Winter</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Issa</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Norman</surname> <given-names>RI</given-names></name> <name><surname>Howick</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials</article-title>. <source>BMJ Open.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>e036471</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036471</pub-id></mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3117402/overview">Gunilla Bj&#x000F6;rling</ext-link>, J&#x000F6;nk&#x000F6;ping University, Sweden</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/416780/overview">Jeff Bolles</ext-link>, Francis Marion University, United States</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2904439/overview">Mihaela-Emilia Dumitru</ext-link>, Sfantul Apostol Andrei Emergency Clini, Romania</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>