<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<?covid-19-tdm?>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Public Health</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Public Health</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Public Health</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-2565</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpubh.2025.1605272</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Public Health</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Risk factor analysis and predictive model development for healthcare-associated infections post-coronary artery bypass grafting</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Yan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>Lingbo</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Ping</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Jiaojiao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Xiao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Xiaoqiang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3024557/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Infection Management Department, Nantong First People's Hospital</institution>, <addr-line>Nantong</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nantong First People's Hospital</institution>, <addr-line>Nantong</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Edited by: Mouloudj Kamel, University of Medea, Algeria</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0003">
<p>Reviewed by: Dachel Mart&#x00ED;nez Asanza, National School of Public Health (ENSAP), Cuba</p>
<p>Mariya Dimitrova, Plovdiv Medical University, Bulgaria</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Xiaoqiang Yu, <email>yuxiaoqiang_yxq@126.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>03</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1605272</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>03</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>13</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Liu, Xue, Jiang, Shen, Peng and Yu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Liu, Xue, Jiang, Shen, Peng and Yu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="sec1">
<title>Objective</title>
<p>This study aimed to analyze the risk factors associated with healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in individuals who underwent post-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to develop a predictive model for infection risk assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2">
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent CABG at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2023. Data sources included the hospital infection surveillance system, hospital information system, and a questionnaire for HAIs in patients after cardiac surgery. Patients were divided into an infection group and a non-infection group based on whether they developed HAIs during the postoperative hospitalization period. Logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors and to develop a risk prediction model. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Results</title>
<p>Independent risk factors for HAIs post-CABG included diabetes (odds ratio [OR]&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.467), preoperative white blood cell count (OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.117), preoperative albumin levels (OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;0.146), intraoperative blood transfusion (OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.001), presence of an indwelling drainage tube (OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.864), drainage volume (OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.003), duration of ventilator use (OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.656), and central venous catheterization time (OR&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.103). The predictive model was established as: Ln (P/1&#x2212;P)&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;2.230&#x202F;+&#x202F;1.467 &#x002A; diabetes + 0.117 &#x002A; preoperative white blood cell count &#x2212;0.146 &#x002A; preoperative albumin + 0.001 &#x002A; intraoperative blood transfusion + 0.864 &#x002A; drainage tube indwelling + 0.003 &#x002A; drainage volume + 0.656 &#x002A; ventilator use time + 0.103 &#x002A; central venous catheterization time. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated a good model fit with observed values. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the model achieved an area under the curve of 0.970, with a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 92.1%.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The independent risk factors for HAIs after CABG were diabetes, body mass index, preoperative white blood cell count, intraoperative blood transfusion volume, duration of pericardial and mediastinal drainage tube placement, total drainage volume, duration of mechanical ventilation, and duration of central venous catheterization. The developed risk prediction model demonstrated high accuracy in estimating postoperative HAI risk.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)</kwd>
<kwd>health care associated infections (HAIs)</kwd>
<kwd>logistic regression</kwd>
<kwd>prediction model</kwd>
<kwd>risk factors</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="29"/>
<page-count count="9"/>
<word-count count="4930"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec5">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Healthcare-associated infection (HAI), also referred to as nosocomial infection, has emerged as a significant public health concern worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>). China&#x2019;s aging population has contributed to a rising incidence of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CHD) posing substantial challenges to the prevention and management of cardiovascular diseases globally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is widely recognized as one of the most effective interventions for the treatment of coronary heart disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>). In recent years, the frequency of CABG procedures has increased considerably (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>). However, due to the complexity of the surgical procedure, the extended operative duration, and its invasive nature, CABG is associated with higher likelihood of postoperative complications, including HAIs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>). These complications not only adversely impact surgical outcomes and patient recovery but may also pose life-threatening risks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>). Consequently, reducing postoperative complications post-CABG has become a focal point of research and clinical practice.</p>
<p>Studies have indicated that individuals undergoing CABG are at an elevated risk of developing HAIs, which represents one of the most common postoperative complications, with an infection rate as high as 20% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>). Postoperative infections can adversely impede recovery and surgical outcomes, potentially leading to prolonged hospitalization, increased healthcare costs, and in severe cases, mortality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>). As a result, early identification of risk factors and accurate prediction of HAI risk is critical for implementing preventive strategies and improving patient outcomes.</p>
<p>Research on HAIs in individuals post-CABG in China remains relatively limited. Although some studies have been conducted, findings are fragmented and comprehensive investigations on risk prediction models remain scarce. Existing studies on risk factors are not exhaustive and a well-established theoretical framework and research methodology are lacking. The logistic regression model has been widely utilized in clinical risk prediction due to its ability to effectively demonstrate the relationships between independent and dependent variables, providing valuable predictive insights into disease occurrence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>).</p>
<p>The present study aimed to systematically evaluate the prevalence and independent risk factors of HAIs in individuals undergoing CABG and to develop a predictive risk model. The primary objective was to facilitate the early identification of HAI risk factors, guide the implementation of targeted infection prevention strategies, and effectively reduce the incidence of HAIs post-CABG. Additionally, new perspectives and methodologies were contributed by this study to enhance postoperative infection prevention and control in patients undergoing CABG.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2</label>
<title>Study participants and methods</title>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Study participants</title>
<p>This observational study included a total of 445 individuals who underwent CABG at the hospital between January 2019 and December 2023. This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Nantong First People&#x2019;s Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.</p>
<p>Inclusion criteria were as follows: &#x2460; Individuals who met the diagnostic criteria for coronary heart disease and had a confirmed diagnosis through coronary angiography prior to surgery; &#x2461; Individuals aged 18&#x202F;years or older; &#x2462; Individuals with no history of cardiac surgery; &#x2463; Individuals who underwent off-pump CABG as the surgical approach.</p>
<p>Exclusion criteria were as follows: &#x2460; Individuals with a community-acquired infection at the time of admission; &#x2461; Individuals with preoperative history of valvar heart disease and congenital heart disease; &#x2462; Individuals who had recently used antibacterial agents; &#x2463; Individuals with incomplete clinical data.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Diagnosis of HAI</title>
<p>HAI diagnosis was determined in accordance with the criteria outlined in the Diagnostic Criteria for HAI (Trial) issued by the Ministry of Health of China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>). Additionally, to ensure accuracy, a second review was conducted by HAI specialists and medical experts in cardiac and vascular surgery to confirm the presence of HAIs during the postoperative hospital stay. Based on this evaluation, individuals were categorized into either an infected group or a non-infected group.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Questionnaire contents</title>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.3.1</label>
<title>Socio-demographic data</title>
<p>The questionnaire collected socio-demographic information, including inpatient number, age, sex, ward, preoperative hospital stay (days), postoperative hospital stay (days), total hospital stay (days), past medical history, body mass index (BMI), and other relevant details.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>2.3.2</label>
<title>Preoperative biochemical indicators</title>
<p>Preoperative biochemical indicators were recorded, such as albumin (g/L), white blood cell count (&#x00D7;109/L), and other pertinent laboratory values.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>2.3.3</label>
<title>Surgery-related factors</title>
<p>Surgery-related factors included surgical approach, anesthesia method, duration of surgery(hours), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) surgical risk classification, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) surgical risk classification, surgical grade, intraoperative blood transfusion, and type of surgical incision.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>2.3.4</label>
<title>Invasive procedures</title>
<p>Data on invasive procedures were collected, including presence of drainage tube, tracheal intubation, and other relevant interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>2.3.5</label>
<title>Medication-related factors</title>
<p>Medication-related factors encompassed the use of prophylactic antibiotics, intraoperative antibiotic administration, and other related pharmacological details.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>2.3.6</label>
<title>HAI status</title>
<p>HAI status included information such as site of infection, pathogenic bacteria, and others.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Methods</title>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>2.4.1</label>
<title>Data collection</title>
<p>In alignment with the target monitoring requirements for HAIs, a structured questionnaire was developed, and data were collected using a real-time HAI monitoring system and the hospital information system. Case data for all enrolled individuals included demographic characteristics, medical history, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), duration of surgery, extracorporeal circulation time, pathogen profiles, and other relevant clinical variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>2.4.2</label>
<title>Pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing</title>
<p>When signs of suspected infection were observed during hospitalization post-CABG, sputum, blood, wound secretions, and samples from suspected infection sites were aseptically collected and placed in sterile sampling tubes for pathogen culture. Bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed using the BioM&#x00E9;rieux ATB fully automated identification system, in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the National Guide to Clinical Laboratory Procedures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>). Quality control strains, including <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> ATCC28753, <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> ATCC25922, <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> ATCC25923, and <italic>Candida albicans</italic> ATCC90028, among others, were obtained from the Clinical Laboratory Center of the Ministry of Health. Duplicate strains isolated from the same patient were excluded from the analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>2.4.3</label>
<title>Quality control</title>
<p>Data collectors underwent prior training in HAI-related knowledge and strictly adhered to the inclusion and exclusion criteria throughout the data collection process. To further enhance data accuracy, confirmed cases were reviewed by cardiovascular surgeons and hospital infection management experts. Following data collection, entries were independently recorded and cross-checked by two individuals to ensure data authenticity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>2.4.4</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23.0. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages (%), with group comparisons conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher&#x2019;s exact test. Continuous variables following a normal distribution were presented as mean &#x00B1; standard deviation, and group differences were assessed using the <italic>t</italic>-test. Risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Statistically significant variables were included in a stepwise logistic regression model to identify independent risk factors and construct a predictive model, with results expressed as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Multicollinearity among independent variables was evaluated using variance inflation factors. Model goodness-of-fit was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, where <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05 indicated good fit. Predictive performance was evaluated using ROC curves; the closer the area under the curve (AUC) is to 1, the better the model&#x2019;s discrimination. A two-tailed test with a significance level of <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.05 was used, and <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec21">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec22">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Occurrence of HAI</title>
<p>Among the 445 patients who underwent CABG, 42 developed HAIs, resulting in an infection rate of 9.44%. A total of 46 infection cases were recorded, corresponding to an overall infection rate of 10.34%. The highest number of infections occurred in the second quarter with an infection rate of 13.83%, followed by the fourth quarter, where the infection rate was 10.88, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>HAIs in patients post-CABG.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Time grouping</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number of cases monitored</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number of infected cases</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Infection rate (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number of times of infected cases</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Infection time rate (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Year</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2019</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">103</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13.59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2020</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">86</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2021</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">64</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.38</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2022</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">99</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.08</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2023</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">93</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.68</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.68</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Quarter</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">83</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.22</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">94</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13.83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">121</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">147</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.88</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Total</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">445</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">42</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.44</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">46</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.34</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec23">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Distribution of HAI sites</title>
<p>The respiratory system was the most frequently affected HAI site among patients post-CABG, accounting for 58.70% of cases. Surgical site infections were the second most common, comprising 21.74% of cases, as detailed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Distribution of HAI sites post-CABG.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Infection site</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number of cases (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;46)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Incidence rate (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Respiratory system</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">58.70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Upper respiratory tract</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lower respiratory tract</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">34.78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Ventilator associated pneumonia</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15.22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Pleural cavity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Surgical site infection</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">21.74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Superficial incision infection</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Deep incision infection</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Blood system</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Septicemia</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Catheter-associated bloodstream infection</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Urinary system</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Urinary tract infection</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Catheter associated urinary tract infection</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.35</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec24">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Distribution of pathogenic bacteria in HAI</title>
<p>Among the 46 individuals with HAIs post-CABG, a total of 56 strains of pathogenic bacteria were identified. Gram-negative bacteria were the most prevalent, comprising 38 strains (67.86%), followed by gram-positive bacteria with 12 strains (21.43%). Additionally, 6 fungal strains were detected. The detailed distribution is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Species and composition ratio of pathogenic bacteria.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Pathogenic bacteria</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number of strains</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Composition ratio (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Gram-positive bacteria</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">21.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Enterococcus faecium</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17.86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Gram-negative bacteria</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">67.86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Enterobacter aerogenes</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Escherichia coli</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Acinetobacter baumannii</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fungi</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Candida albicans</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.93</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Filamentous fungi</italic></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.79</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec25">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Univariate analysis</title>
<p>Univariate analysis was conducted with HAIs as the dependent variable and associated influencing factors as independent variables. The findings demonstrated that BMI, diabetes, preoperative albumin levels, preoperative white blood cell count, preoperative C-reactive protein levels, operative duration, intraoperative blood transfusion, administration of additional antibiotics during surgery, duration of pericardial mediastinal drainage tube placement, duration of thoracic drainage tube placement, total drainage volume, total length of hospital stay, postoperative hospital stay, duration of surgical intensive care unit stay, incidence of unplanned reoperation, postoperative ventilator use duration, urinary catheterization duration, and central venous catheterization duration were significantly associated with an increased risk of HAIs post-CABG (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;</italic> 0.05). The detailed results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>CABG univariate analysis of HAIs post-CABG.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Influencing factor</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Infected group (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;42)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Non-infected group (<italic>n</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;403)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Statistic</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p value</italic></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Age (year)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">66.07&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;7.66</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">63.28&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;9.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.932</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.054</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Sex</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.895</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.344</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Male</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">289</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4">Female</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">114</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.901</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.048</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">115</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">36</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">288</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hypertension</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.772</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.380</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">192</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">211</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Diabetes</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.692</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.017</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">172</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">231</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hyperlipemia</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.778</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.378</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">112</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">291</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Preoperative albumin (g/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33.528&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;4.755</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38.031&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;4.43</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.224</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Preoperative LVEF (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">58.60&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;6.38</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">57.0&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;6.18</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.554</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.121</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Preoperative white blood cell count (&#x00D7;10<sup>9</sup>/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.82&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.215</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.243&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;4.279</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;3.793</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Preoperative C reactive protein (ng/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23.685&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;26.666</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.466&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;13.263</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;5.184</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">NNIS scoring</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.955</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.082<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Grade 1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Grade 2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">41</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">371</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Grade 3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">ASA classification</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.793</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.238<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">II</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">III</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">299</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">IV</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">82</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">V</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Operation duration (h)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.168&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.551</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.525&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.513</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;2.613</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.009</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Intraoperative blood transfusion volume (ml)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">549.517&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;561.124</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1413.036&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;997.524</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;6.891</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Bypass number</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.567</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.094<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">74</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">120</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">112</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">82</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Prophylactic antibiotics</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.468<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">39</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">383</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Addition of antibiotics during operation</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.516</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.034</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">56</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">41</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">347</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Pericardial mediastinal drainage tube indwelling time (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.00&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.89</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.65&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.09</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;8.777</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Thoracic drainage tube indwelling</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.583</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.006</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">52</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">351</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Total drainage (ml)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1007.57&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;239.93</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">672&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;212.94</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;7.474</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Aortic balloon pump</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.169<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">37</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">380</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hospital stay (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29.17&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;7.85</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29.17&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;10.46</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;5.409</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Preoperative hospital stay (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.57&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;5.047</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.16&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;5.096</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.497</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.620</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Postoperative hospital stay (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29.17&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;10.46</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22.04&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;7.847</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;4.681</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">sICU retention time (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.07&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.218</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.41&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.937</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;4.239</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Unplanned reoperation</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">30.984</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">392</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Ventilator use time (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.98&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;1.199</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.20&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;0.837</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;4.790</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Urinary catheter indwelling time (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.714&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.884</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.645&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;3.832</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;23.326</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Central venous catheterization time (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.619&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.862</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.67&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;2.775</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;4.085</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn1">
<label>a</label>
<p>Non-parametric test.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="tfn2">
<label>b</label>
<p>Fisher exact probability method.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec26">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Multivariate analysis</title>
<p>Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified diabetes, BMI, preoperative white blood cell count, intraoperative blood transfusion, duration of pericardial mediastinal drainage tube placement, total drainage volume, ventilator use duration, and central venous catheterization duration as independent risk factors for HAIs post-CABG (<italic>p&#x202F;&#x003C;</italic> 0.05). The variance inflation factors were all less than 10, indicating no multicollinearity among the included independent variables. The detailed results are as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Analysis of independent risk factors of HAIs post-CABG.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Influencing factor</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>&#x03B2;</italic> value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Standard error</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Wald value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">OR value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">95%CI</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Body mass index</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;2.238</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.006</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.955</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.026</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.107</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[0.015,0.765]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Diabetes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.467</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.718</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.174</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.041</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.338</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[1.061,17.726]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Preoperative white blood cell count (&#x00D7;10<sup>9</sup>/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.117</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.043</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.518</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.006</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.124</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[1.034,1.222]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Preoperative albumin (g/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.146</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.073</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.981</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.046</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.864</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[0.749,0.997]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Preoperative c-reactive protein (ng/L)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.034</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.017</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.790</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.052</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.035</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[1.000,1.071]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Operation duration (h)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.213</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.197</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.171</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.279</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.237</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[0.841,1.820]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Intraoperative blood transfusion volume (ml)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.422</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.035</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[1.000,1.002]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Unplanned operation</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.515</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.765</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.736</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.391</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.547</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[0.143,144.709]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Addition of antibiotics during operation</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.443</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.162</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.536</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.111</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31.282</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[0.452,171.942]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Pericardial mediastinal drainage tube indwelling time (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.864</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.201</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18.483</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.372</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[1.600,3.517]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Thoracic drainage tube</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.910</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.889</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.048</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.306</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.485</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[0.435,14.195]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Total drainage (ml)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.003</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.154</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.007</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.003</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[1.001,1.006]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Hospital stay (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.096</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.062</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.398</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.121</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.100</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[0.975,1.242]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Postoperative hospital stay (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.051</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.033</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.468</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.116</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.053</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[0.987,1.122]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">sICU time (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.283</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.353</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.639</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.424</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.754</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[0.377,1.507]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Ventilator use time (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.656</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.325</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.062</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.044</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.927</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[1.018,3.647]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Urethral intubation time (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.080</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.051</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.479</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.115</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.084</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[0.981,1.197]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Central venous catheterization time (d)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.203</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.103</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.910</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.048</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.225</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[1.002,1.498]</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec27">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Model goodness-of-fit test</title>
<p>A predictive model for HAIs post-CABG was developed using multivariate logistic regression, represented by the equation:</p>
<p>Ln (P/1-P)&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;2.230&#x202F;+&#x202F;1.467 &#x002A; diabetes + 0.117 &#x002A; preoperative white blood cell count &#x2212;0.146 &#x002A; preoperative albumin + 0.001 &#x002A; intraoperative blood transfusion + 0.864 &#x002A; drainage tube indwelling + 0.003 &#x002A; drainage volume + 0.656 &#x002A; ventilator use time + 0.103 &#x002A; central venous catheterization time.</p>
<p>The Hosmer-Lemeshow test results indicated that the difference between predicted and actual values was not statistically significant (<italic>&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup></italic> = 3.032, <italic>p</italic> = 0.932), demonstrating a good model fit, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Test of goodness-of-fit of prediction model.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpubh-13-1605272-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Scatter plot with observed and predicted values as blue and orange dots along a diagonal line, indicating strong correlation. A red dotted line represents the observed values, and a blue dotted line represents the predicted values. The x-axis ranges from 0 to 50, and the y-axis ranges from 0 to 1.2.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec28">
<label>3.7</label>
<title>ROC analysis for predictive value of model</title>
<p>ROC curve analysis revealed that the model had an AUC of 0.970 [95% CI: 0.948&#x2013;0.993] for predicting HAIs post-CABG. The model demonstrated a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 92.1%. The cut-off value was determined to be 0.825, with <italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C; 0.001, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>ROC curve of prediction model of logistic regression.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpubh-13-1605272-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showing the true positive rate (sensitivity) against the false positive rate (1-specificity). The blue curve represents the performance of a model, while the green diagonal line indicates a random classifier. The model's curve is above the diagonal, indicating better-than-random performance.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec29">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>CABG is one of the primary treatment strategies for coronary artery diseases both in China and internationally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>). As the number of surgical interventions for coronary artery diseases continues to increase annually, the incidence of HAIs following surgery is also rising (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref15 ref16">14&#x2013;16</xref>). However, HAIs are largely preventable. In recent years, predictive modeling has seen widespread application in clinical practice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>). Early identification of these risk factors allows for timely clinical interventions, thereby reducing the incidence of postoperative HAIs.</p>
<p>Previous studies have shown that the incidence of HAIs ranges from 3 to 5% in developed countries, while in developing countries it may reach 10 to 20%. In this study, the HAI rate among CABG patients was 9.44%, lower than the 28.10% reported by Zhao et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>) but higher than the 2.74% reported by Qi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>). Variations may be attributed to differences in study periods, patient populations, geographic locations, and sample sizes. The most common infection site was the respiratory tract, consistent with findings from other domestic studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>). International research also indicates that respiratory and urinary tract infections are the most frequent HAIs following CABG (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>), further confirming the lower respiratory tract as the predominant infection site.</p>
<p>Intraoperative and early postoperative tracheal intubation disrupts the airway&#x2019;s natural defenses and hinders secretion clearance, increasing the risk of respiratory infections. These findings suggest that targeted respiratory infection prevention strategies should be implemented post-CABG. The primary pathogens identified were Gram-negative bacteria, aligning with domestic and international trends (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>). While Gram-negative organisms should be prioritized in empirical therapy, variation in specific pathogens across regions and time points underscores the need for antimicrobial stewardship based on local susceptibility profiles. These results provide evidence for the rational use of antibiotics in clinical settings.</p>
<p>By using logistic regression, we constructed a predictive model for HAIs in CABG patients. The model identified several independent risk factors: diabetes, body mass index, preoperative white blood cell count, intraoperative blood transfusion volume, duration of pericardial and mediastinal drainage tube placement, total drainage volume, duration of mechanical ventilation, and central venous catheterization time. Previous studies suggest that comorbidities and immunosuppression increase HAI risk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>). Invasive procedures such as intubation, catheterization, and drainage compromise the body&#x2019;s natural defenses, and prolonged indwelling time or inadequate aseptic technique further elevate infection risk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>). Moreover, intraoperative blood transfusions may suppress immune function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>) and introduce pathogens, thereby increasing HAI risk. This finding is consistent with Kato et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>). Interestingly, urinary catheterization was not identified as an independent risk factor in this study, possibly due to the limited sample size, suggesting a need for further investigation with larger cohorts.</p>
<p>Prevention remains the cornerstone of HAI management following CABG. Accurate risk stratification and early intervention are crucial to reducing infection rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>). Research indicates that predictive models based on statistical analysis can accurately forecast infection events and inform targeted interventions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">29</xref>). In our study, the predictive model demonstrated strong diagnostic performance, with an AUC of 0.970. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed good model calibration, indicating strong internal consistency and potential clinical applicability. To translate this model into practice, HAI surveillance teams can integrate it into routine monitoring of CABG patients to identify high-risk individuals earlier and implement timely infection control measures. Clinical implications include: (1) System integration: Linking the predictive model with the hospital&#x2019;s electronic health system for real-time risk alerts; (2) Guideline development: Establishing stratified prevention and monitoring protocols based on patient risk levels; (3) Multidisciplinary support: Forming cross-departmental teams to resolve implementation issues and ensure smooth integration into clinical workflows.</p>
<p>This study has some limitations. First, it is a retrospective single-center study from a tertiary hospital, limiting generalizability and introducing potential selection bias. Second, the model has not been externally validated in other clinical settings, and its applicability requires further confirmation. Future research involving multicenter, large-sample prospective studies will aim to include cross-validation or bootstrap methods to validate the model for broader clinical use.</p>
<p>In conclusion, independent risk factors for HAIs after CABG included diabetes, high BMI, elevated preoperative white blood cells, greater blood transfusion volume, prolonged drainage and catheterization times, and increased drainage volume. The risk prediction model showed high accuracy and may aid in guiding infection prevention and management.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec30">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec31">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of Nantong First People&#x2019;s Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec32">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YL: Writing &#x2013; original draft. LX: Data curation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. PJ: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Data curation. JS: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Formal analysis. XP: Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. XY: Resources, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec33">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The study on the mechanism of 0GT-ATF3-LC3 positive feedback loop mediating chromatin remodeling to promote lipophagy in microglia in hypothalamic inflammation under obesity, project number: KD2024KYJJ303.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec34">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec35">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec36">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kollef</surname> <given-names>MH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Torres</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shorr</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin-Loeches</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Micek</surname> <given-names>ST</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Nosocomial infection</article-title>. <source>Crit Care Med</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>49</volume>:<fpage>169</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/CCM.0000000000004783</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33438970</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>WW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>LS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Summary of China cardiovascular disease report 2015</article-title>. <source>Chin Circ J</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>521</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schwann</surname> <given-names>TA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramia</surname> <given-names>PS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Habib</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Engoren</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonnell</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Habib</surname> <given-names>RH</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effectiveness of radial artery-based multiarterial coronary artery bypass grafting: role of body habitus</article-title>. <source>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>156</volume>:<fpage>43</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51.e2</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.02.085</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29615332</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghandakly</surname> <given-names>EC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iacona</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bakaeen</surname> <given-names>FG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Coronary artery surgery: past, present, and future</article-title>. <source>Rambam Maimonides Med J</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>e0001</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5041/RMMJ.10515</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38261345</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zukowska</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaczmarczyk</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Listewnik</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zukowski</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Impact of post-operative infection after CABG on long-term survival</article-title>. <source>J Clin Med</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>3125</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/jcm12093125</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37176568</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>YF</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>ML</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Risk factors for cardiothoracic surgical site infection</article-title>. <source>Chin J Infect Control</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gulack</surname> <given-names>BC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kirkwood</surname> <given-names>KA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><collab id="coll1">Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network (CTSN)</collab></person-group>. <article-title>Secondary surgical-site infection after coronary artery bypass grafting: a multi-institutional prospective cohort study</article-title>. <source>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>155</volume>:<fpage>1555</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.078</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rebmann</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kohut</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Preventing mediastinitis surgical site infections: executive summary of the Association for Professionals in infection control and epidemiology's elimination guide</article-title>. <source>Am J Infect Control</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>39</volume>:<fpage>529</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ajic.2010.10.014</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21565422</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Costabella</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>KB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adepoju</surname> <given-names>AV</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Attia Hussein Mahmoud</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zafar</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Healthcare cost and outcomes associated with surgical site infection and patient outcomes in low- and middle-income countries</article-title>. <source>Cureus</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>e42493</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7759/cureus.42493</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37637579</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hewett</surname> <given-names>TE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Webster</surname> <given-names>KE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hurd</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Systematic selection of key logistic regression variables for risk prediction analyses: a five-factor maximum model</article-title>. <source>Clin J Sport Med</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>78</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>85</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/JSM.0000000000000486</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28817414</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll2">Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China</collab></person-group>. <article-title>Diagnostic criteria for nosocomial infection (trial edition)</article-title>. <source>Chin Med J</source>. (<year>2001</year>) <volume>81</volume>:<fpage>314</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="book"><source>National operating procedures for clinical examination</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Beijing Hospital, Ministry of Health</publisher-name> (<year>1999</year>). Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=SyD34uTtguCqyy-1-Pl0qTlIKF_vgdf-FchpAmw6k8d36krzhC8FXbsWjhJAJUN5th_cZRQ5tOjcb2xauRIiNwHtg0xUtRUteXB8ov_3yamglxM8TXtaM1blyVzjH917qj4vJydEcpwQ7OoA7dzOTfZ9X9JMwkDE9MHl-TihzG8CWu86M0KdhA==&#x0026;uniplatform=NZKPT&#x0026;language=CHS" ext-link-type="uri">https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=SyD34uTtguCqyy-1-Pl0qTlIKF_vgdf-FchpAmw6k8d36krzhC8FXbsWjhJAJUN5th_cZRQ5tOjcb2xauRIiNwHtg0xUtRUteXB8ov_3yamglxM8TXtaM1blyVzjH917qj4vJydEcpwQ7OoA7dzOTfZ9X9JMwkDE9MHl-TihzG8CWu86M0KdhA==&#x0026;uniplatform=NZKPT&#x0026;language=CHS</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cang</surname> <given-names>ZQ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>YJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>YY</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Review and prospect of clinical application of EuroSCORE</article-title>. <source>Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>23</volume>:<fpage>1012</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shah</surname> <given-names>RM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chatterjee</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheema</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Loor</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lemaire</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Incidence, cost, and risk factors for readmission after coronary artery bypass grafting</article-title>. <source>Ann Thorac Surg</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>107</volume>:<fpage>1782</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.10.077</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30553740</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yasin</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zimmerer</surname> <given-names>TW</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>An empirical investigation of quality improvement initiatives in for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals: environmental, competitive and outcome concerns</article-title>. <source>Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>539</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/09526860610704169</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17100223</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mei</surname> <given-names>YQ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Infection after cardiac surgery</article-title>. <source>J Cardiovasc Surg</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Explainable artificial intelligence for predictive modeling in healthcare</article-title>. <source>J Healthc Inform Res</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>228</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s41666-022-00114-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35194568</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>QY</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>ZK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Construction of nosocomial infection risk prediction model after coronary artery bypass grafting</article-title>. <source>Chin J Nosocomiol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>296</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>300</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Influencing factors for postoperative infections in patients undergoing heart bypass surgery and prevention measures</article-title>. <source>Chin J Nosocomiol</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>3695</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alamer</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alharbi</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aldhilan</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Almushayti</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alghofaily</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elbehiry</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs): challenges and measures taken by the radiology department to control infection transmission</article-title>. <source>Vaccines (Basel)</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>2060</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/vaccines10122060</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36560470</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zang</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Clinical risk factors for postoperative infection in adult cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a retrospective study</article-title>. <source>Infect Prev Pract</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>100458</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100458</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40336598</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>P&#x00E9;rez-Granda</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barrio</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cuerpo</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Valerio</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mu&#x00F1;oz</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hortal</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Infectious complications following major heart surgery from the day of the surgery to hospital discharge</article-title>. <source>BMC Infect Dis</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>73</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12879-023-08972-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38200426</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Albumin/Procalcitonin ratio is a sensitive early marker of nosocomial blood stream infection in patients with intra-cerebral hemorrhage</article-title>. <source>Surg Infect</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>643</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/sur.2018.260</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31163000</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heffernan</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>HL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huston</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Claridge</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name> <name><surname>May</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Surgical infection society guidance for operative and peri-operative care of adult patients infected by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)</article-title>. <source>Surg Infect</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/sur.2020.101</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32310715</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ran</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Application of disposable multifunctional drainage tube-assisted irrigation in patients with severe multi-space infections in Oral and maxillofacial head and neck regions</article-title>. <source>J Craniofac Surg</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>e202</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/SCS.0000000000006236</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31977712</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barron</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gornbein</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Are red blood cell transfusions associated with nosocomial infections in pediatric intensive care units?</article-title> <source>Pediatr Crit Care Med</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>464</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181ce708d</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20081555</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kato</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chikuda</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohya</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Risk of infective complications associated with transfusion after elective spinal surgery</article-title>. <source>Chin J Clin Basic Orthop Res</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>128</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><label>28.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Noor</surname> <given-names>NM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sousa</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paul</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roblin</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Early diagnosis, early stratification, and early intervention to deliver precision medicine in IBD</article-title>. <source>Inflamm Bowel Dis</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<fpage>1254</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/ibd/izab228</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34480558</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><label>29.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>SG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Research progress on diabetes risk prediction model</article-title>. <source>Chin J Med</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>58</volume>:<fpage>1064</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>.</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>