<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Public Health</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Public Health</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Public Health</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-2565</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpubh.2025.1506454</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Public Health</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The double-edged sword effect of conscientiousness on the work engagement of medical staff in Chinese public hospitals</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Hui</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2920028/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Hua</surname> <given-names>Xuelu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Shibing</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2758894/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Ling</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1330568/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>School of Business, Jiangsu Ocean University</institution>, <addr-line>Lianyungang</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Lianyungang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>Lianyungang</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>School of Environmental Engineering, Xuzhou Institute of Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Xuzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001"><p>Edited by: Mar&#x00ED;lia Silva Paulo, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002"><p>Reviewed by: Amir Faisal, Sumatra Institute of Technology, Indonesia</p><p>Yandra Rivaldo, Universitas Ibnu Sina, Indonesia</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Shibing Wu, <email>wushibing0130@163.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>30</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1506454</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>05</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>17</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Sun, Hua, Wu and Sun.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Sun, Hua, Wu and Sun</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="sec1">
<title>Background</title>
<p>In China, medical staff in public hospitals are the primary providers of healthcare services. Their work engagement directly affects patients&#x2019; perceptions of the level and quality of their medical services. Conscientiousness has a significant impact on the work engagement of medical staff, but the mechanism between the two is not yet clear.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2">
<title>Objective</title>
<p>This study examined the double-edged sword effect of conscientiousness on medical staff work engagement, with a particular focus on exploring the mediating effects of thriving at work (TAW) and workload, as well as the moderating effect of perceived insider status (PIS).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Methods</title>
<p>The study sample was drawn from four public hospitals in the Jiangsu Province, Shanghai City, and Zhejiang Province. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS, and mediation and moderations effects tested were conducted through the Bootstrap method.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Results</title>
<p>The results demonstrate the following: (1) conscientiousness has a positive effect on the work engagement of medical staff; (2) conscientiousness has a positive effect on work engagement through thriving at work (TAW), and a negative effect on work engagement through workloads; (3) perceived insider status (PIS) moderates the relationship between conscientiousness and TAW, and the relationship between conscientiousness and workloads; and (4) PIS moderates the indirect effect of conscientiousness on work engagement through TAW, whereas the mediated relationship is strengthened when medical staff members exhibit a higher PIS. Simultaneously, PIS moderates the indirect effect of conscientiousness on work engagement through workload, and the mediating relationship is weakened for medical staff members who have a higher PIS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study provides a balanced and dialectical understanding of the impact of conscientiousness, providing significant reference for enhancing the work engagement of medical staff in public hospitals.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>conscientiousness</kwd>
<kwd>work engagement</kwd>
<kwd>thriving at work</kwd>
<kwd>workload</kwd>
<kwd>perceived insider status</kwd>
<kwd>medical staff</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="3"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="46"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="7060"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Occupational Health and Safety</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec6">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>In China, medical staff in public hospitals are the healthcare service providers for the vast majority of the population. Relevant data indicate that medical staff in tertiary hospitals in China work an average of 51.05&#x202F;h per week, whereas medical staff in secondary hospitals work an average of 51.13&#x202F;h per week (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>), less than one-quarter of medical staff are able to take their statutory annual leave. In addition to long working hours, factors such as poor communication between doctors and patients, and differences in patients&#x2019; understanding of health have led to increasingly tense doctor-patient relationships in China. The number of medical disputes has been increasing annually, and medical problems occur occasionally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>). Therefore, in this context, medical staff need heightened conscientiousness to overcome external environmental pressures and internal mental stressors.</p>
<p>Previous researches have mainly shown the positive impacts of conscientiousness in the workplace such as improving job performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>), enhancing subjective well-being (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>), bringing job satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>), and proactive organizational behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>). But some scholars have also pointed out the potential negative impact of conscientiousness. For example, Liu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>) noted that employees with higher conscientiousness tend to spend a considerable amount of time, investing high effort into their work to achieve high performance, which can make them more susceptible to feelings of stress, tension, and depression. These studies have enriched the understanding of the impact of conscientiousness from the perspectives of work behaviors and outcomes, but they have not paid attention to individuals&#x2019; work engagement. Work engagement reflects employee&#x2019;s work states and serves as a crucial factor for organizations to achieve performance breakthroughs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>). The level of work engagement among medical staff in public hospitals directly affects patient perceptions of the level and quality of medical services, playing a positive role in improving clinical treatment outcomes and enhancing patient satisfaction with medical care (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>). In this context, investigating whether conscientiousness among medical staff in public hospitals influences their work engagement and understanding how this influence occurs is not only a realistic problem, but also a theoretical inquiry into the personality traits of medical staff in the specific context of China&#x2019;s national conditions. Considering that work engagement is the result of the combined action of multiple factors, and based on the above-mentioned contradictory research conclusions, we boldly assume that conscientiousness is likely a double-edged sword, with its intensity having a dual effect on an individual&#x2019;s work engagement. To clarify the dual nature of conscientiousness and the internal mechanisms through which it influences work engagement of medical staff, this study introduced the conservation of resources (COR) theory.</p>
<p>COR theory is based on the primary assumption that individuals have an inherent tendency to acquire, build, or preserve high-quality resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>). Based on this assumption, individuals typically experience two effect mechanisms in resource processing: resource gain and resource loss spirals. Conscientiousness has two potential outcomes regarding its impact on medical staff work engagement. On the one hand, high conscientiousness provides internal resources that awaken medical staff&#x2019;s achievement needs, facilitating the utilization of personal traits to ignite work vitality and sustained learning, which leads to a state of TAW and triggers a spiral of resources. This in turn prompts greater effort and a heightened display of work engagement in daily tasks. On the other hand, owing to their intense focus on work tasks and high self-demand, medical staff with high conscientiousness are likely to experience extended working hours. This inevitably contributes to a heightened workload, initiating a resource loss spiral, and consequently reducing the willingness to engage in work.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the social exchange theory posits a relationship between reciprocal benefits between employees and organizations. When employees perceive a strong and mutually recognized connection with an organization, they identify as &#x201C;insiders.&#x201D; PIS has a direct and profound impact on employee work autonomy and workplace behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>). Therefore, to explore both value-adding and value-depleting mechanisms of conscientiousness in work engagement, this study introduced PIS as a boundary condition to examine whether it plays a moderating role in these mechanisms.</p>
<p>In summary, based on COR and social exchange theory, this study investigated the mechanism of conscientiousness on the work engagement of medical staff. The potential contributions of this study are threefold. First, we analyzes the benefits and drawbacks of conscientiousness. It provides empirical support that contradicts the consensus regarding the generally favorable effects of such personality. Second, we apply the COR framework to identify TAW and workload as distinct internal mechanisms in order to clarify how conscientiousness affects work engagement of medical staff. By simultaneously capturing the resource gain and loss processes that originate from conscientiousness, our research goes beyond most previous literature, which only considers the impact of conscientiousness on individuals&#x2019; work outcomes and work status through a single resource gain path (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>). This contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the impact of conscientiousness in the theoretical realm, supplementing the existing research on this trait. Third, by highlighting PIS as an important boundary condition, this study identifies which kinds of medical staff can amplify the positive influence of conscientiousness and mitigate its negative impact. Previous research has found that the effectiveness of conscientiousness highly depends on contextual factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>). However, it has largely overlooks the possibility of these impacts being contingent upon medical staffs&#x2019; individual differences.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2</label>
<title>Theory and hypothesis</title>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>The gain path between conscientiousness and work engagement: the role of TAW</title>
<p>Conscientiousness is related to purposefulness, striving to achieve goals, high self-discipline, and planning- and task-orientation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>). Work engagement is a positive behavioral state in which employees integrate physical, cognitive, and emotional aspects into their work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>). TAW was proposed by Spreitzer et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>) and it refers to the simultaneous experience of &#x201C;vitality&#x201D; and &#x201C;learning&#x201D; by employees in their work. It is both a psychological state and a subjective perception of work.</p>
<p>The COR theory has been one of the most influential theories in organizational behavior research over the past 30&#x202F;years, exploring the employees&#x2019; psychological and behavioral motivations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>). It is commonly applied to research topics, such as self-regulation in the workplace (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>), interpersonal interaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>), and work&#x2013;family conflict (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>), providing theoretical explanations for a wide range of organizational psychological and behavioral phenomena.</p>
<p>COR theory suggests that individuals strive to preserve and maintain existing resources while continuously acquiring new resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>). Conscientious employees place greater emphasis on personal achievement, exert more effort at work, set higher goals, and strive to achieve them (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>). Furthermore, traditional Chinese culture emphasizes a sense of responsibility and spirit of dedication, especially in the medical field, where medical staff often see their work as a mission. This value system prompts them to transform their intrinsic sense of responsibility and meaning perception into more emotional resources, exhibit more positive and proactive behaviors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>), and contribute to the improvement of organizational performance. Sethi &#x0026; Kaur (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>) suggested that conscientiousness was related to increased work engagement.</p>
<p>According to COR theory, driven by intrinsic motivation and achievement needs, conscientiousness prompts employees to actively and purposefully focus on their work tasks. This task focus enables TAW directly because purposeful participation in work tasks facilitates the learning of new things and injects employees with positive energy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>). Consistent with this reasoning, Alikaj et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>) discovered that proactive personality traits, such as conscientiousness, can promote TAW.</p>
<p>Furthermore, according to COR theory, TAW encourage employees to continuously accumulate high-quality resources, motivating them to invest more effort in the work they identify with (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>). When individuals have abundant resources, they can prevent resource depletion more effectively, actively acquire new resources, and consequently achieve a more positive work experience. According to this logic, employees who reach the TAW state can gain a sense of competence by completing challenging tasks, which increases their work resources and induces a positive cycle. Consistent with this reasoning, Imran et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>) empirically found that TAW positively impacts work engagement.</p>
<p>Conscientiousness endows employees with a stronger motivation to learn, and it actively reinforces their work motivation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>), providing more intrinsic meaning to their work. In turn, this promotes self-thriving at work through perceiving vitality and embracing learning changes in the job. When employees enter a state of vibrant and energized TAW, they may seize various opportunities for learning, growth, and development, which compels them to become more engaged in their work. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H</italic>1: Conscientiousness has a positive indirect effect on work engagement through TAW.</p>
</disp-quote>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>The loss path between conscientiousness and work engagement: the role of workload</title>
<p>Workload refers to the number and variety of tasks that employees are required to perform (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>). It also represents the physiological and psychological costs that employees invest in accomplishing their tasks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>).</p>
<p>Conscientious employees are more inclined to allocate personal resources to meet job performance requirements, and they are willing to invest energy in overcoming work-related challenges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>). According to management practices in China, medical staff often have a higher sense of conscientiousness compared to other professionals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>). When balancing work, rest, and family time, they tend to prioritize work. In addition, considering factors such as patient needs and teamwork, they may voluntarily accept additional tasks, be willing to work overtime or adjust work arrangements when needed, as well as be willing to take on more responsibilities and contribute more to their work, thus presenting a workload state.</p>
<p>The COR theory suggests that the total amount of resources possessed by an individual is limited. When facing a high workload, an imbalance among an individual&#x2019;s limited resources can result in emotional resource depletion across multiple roles, conflicting with their pursuit of work&#x2013;family harmony, which exacerbates their role stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>) and triggers a resource loss spiral effect. To change the conflict caused by incompatible roles, employees may reallocate resources and choose conventional ways of handling work, thereby weakening their willingness to engage in the work. Most studies on workload have indicated that an excessive workload negatively affects employees&#x2019; emotions and outcomes. Wang et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">29</xref>) discovered that an elevated workload negatively affects work engagement. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H</italic>2: Conscientiousness has a negative indirect effect on work engagement through workload.</p>
</disp-quote>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Moderating effect of PIS</title>
<p>In the field of organizational behavior, many scholars have started using the concepts of &#x201C;insiders&#x201D; and &#x201C;outsiders&#x201D; based on social exchange theory to explore the relationship between employees and organizations. Social exchange theory is a sociological theory proposed by Blau (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">30</xref>) to study the behavioral relationships between individuals. This is one of the most influential conceptual paradigms for understanding workplace behavior in organizational behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>). PIS refers to an individual&#x2019;s subjective perception of being acknowledged as a member of an organization, reflecting a sense of belonging and influencing individual cognition, emotions, and behavioral tendencies toward the organization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>). In the context of Chinese culture, employees attach great importance to being accepted by their organization. Becoming an &#x201C;insider&#x201D; is of great significance to employees, and it directly affects their performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>).</p>
<p>According to Tracy and Judith (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>), when an individual has high PIS, it is easier to stimulate individual learning behaviors. According to the social exchange theory, when employees perceive recognition from an organization, a strong sense of ownership is generated. They believe that they need to make additional efforts to attract more work resources to the organization, which enhances their vitality and learning status. However, individuals with low PIS position themselves outside the organization. They perceive work as a task to be completed and do not recognize the importance of actively acquiring various knowledge and skills or being actively involved in change, thereby reducing the TAW likelihood. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H</italic>3: PIS positively moderates the relationship between conscientiousness and TAW; the positive relationship between conscientiousness and TAW is stronger among employees with higher PIS than among those with lower one.</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>According to social exchange theory, social exchange is reciprocal behavior. Employees&#x2019; PIS is based on the foundation of high-quality relationships with the organization and its members (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>). Employees with higher PIS perceive the organization as another &#x201C;family,&#x201D; which leads to experiencing psychological job security (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">34</xref>); this provides them with confidence that they can receive help from others when encountering problems at work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>). Therefore, when employees have a higher PIS, they are more likely to seek help from the organization and collaborate with colleagues to share and solve the workload together, especially in the face of a high workload (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>), thereby decomposing the workload to a certain extent and weakening the positive effect of conscientiousness on individual workload. In contrast, when employees have lower PIS, it means that they often &#x201C;float&#x201D; outside the organization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>). In such cases, high workload can lead to negative physical and mental experiences. This situation is worse than simply being driven by conscientiousness to handle high workloads. In this scenario, the positive impact of conscientiousness on individual workload was expected to increase. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H</italic>4: PIS negatively moderates the relationship between conscientiousness and workload. The positive relationship between conscientiousness and workload is weaker among employees with higher PIS than among those with lower one.</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>Building on Hypotheses 1 and 3, this study suggests that PIS positively moderates the mediating effect of TAW on the relationship between conscientiousness and work engagement. Employees with higher PIS are granted greater autonomy in their inherent roles. Conscientiousness drives them to actively acquire the cognitive, knowledge, and skill-based resources needed for work, thereby enhancing their work learning and vitality, igniting a positive work attitude and consequently leading to wholehearted work engagement. Similarly, in line with Hypotheses 2 and 4, this study suggests that PIS negatively moderates the mediating effect of workload on the relationship between conscientiousness and work engagement. When employees have a higher PIS, the self-discipline and sense of responsibility brought about by conscientiousness prompt them to actively seek organizational support when facing a high workload, aiming to quickly recover from resource loss and fully immerse themselves in their work. Thus, we propose the following hypotheses:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H</italic>5: PIS moderates the indirect effect of conscientiousness on work engagement through TAW so that the mediated relationship is strengthened when an employee has a higher level of PIS.</p>
</disp-quote>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H</italic>6: PIS moderates the indirect effect of conscientiousness on work engagement through workload so that the mediated relationship is weakened when an employee has a higher level of PIS.</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>The conceptual model of this study is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Research framework.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpubh-13-1506454-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec11">
<label>3</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Participants and procedures</title>
<p>The study sample was drawn from four public hospitals in the Jiangsu Province, Shanghai City, and Zhejiang Province. The research team distributed the survey questionnaires to the HRM departments. Questionnaires were randomly distributed onsite in the hospitals. Medical staff were free to decide whether to participate in the survey. We assured the respondents that the questionnaire would be anonymous and that the research data would be used solely for academic purposes, encouraging them to respond based on their genuine thoughts. To avoid common method variance (CMV), we distributed the questionnaires at separate times with a 1-month interval (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">37</xref>). At the initial time point, Questionnaire A was distributed, in which employees completed items on demographic variables, conscientiousness, and PIS. One month later, questionnaire B was distributed among the valid samples, which included surveys on TAW and workload. In another month, the survey questionnaire on work engagement was completed. We meticulously matched prenumbered questionnaires following a strict procedure, with the assistance of the relevant hospital HRM departments. After excluding the invalid questionnaires with responses exhibiting patterns or multiple selections, 322 valid questionnaires were paired.</p>
<p>Of the 322 valid questionnaires, 41.30% were completed by male participants. Doctors accounted for 56.52%, whereas nurses accounted for 43.48%. The majority of respondents were aged between 31 and 40&#x202F;years (39.13%) and 41 and 50&#x202F;years (30.43%). Regarding education, the majority of the participants held a bachelor&#x2019;s degree (63.04%), followed by a master&#x2019;s degree (26.08%). In terms of organizational tenure, the primary ranges were 5&#x2013;10&#x202F;years (26.08%) and 10&#x2013;20&#x202F;years (36.95%).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Measures</title>
<p>The questionnaire used a 5-point Likert-type scaling method as follows:</p>
<p>Conscientiousness: A 12-item scale from the NEO Personality Inventory developed by McCrae and Costa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">38</xref>) was used to measure conscientiousness. A sample item was &#x201C;I am able to get organized&#x201D; (<italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.819).</p>
<p>TAW: A 10-item scale developed by Spreitzer et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>) was used to measure the TAW. A sample item was &#x201C;I feel alive and vital&#x201D; (<italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.737).</p>
<p>Work Engagement: A 17-item scale developed by Schaufeli et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">39</xref>) was used to measure work engagement. A sample item was &#x201C;I am immersed in my work&#x201D; (<italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.863).</p>
<p>Workload: A 5-item scale developed by Spector and Jex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>) was used to measure workload. A sample item was &#x201C;I have to speed up in order to complete the work&#x201D; (<italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.865).</p>
<p>PIS: A 6-item scale developed by Stamper and Masterson (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>) was used to measure PIS. A sample item was &#x201C;I feel very much a part of my work organization&#x201D; (&#x03B1;&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.772).</p>
<p>Control Variables: Based on previous research, we controlled for the medical staff&#x2019;s sex, age, education, position, and organizational tenure.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>4</label>
<title>Data analysis and results</title>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Confirmatory factor analysis and common method bias control</title>
<p>This study utilized Amos software for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to evaluate the discriminant validity of the five-factor model, including conscientiousness, TAW, workload, work engagement, and PIS. <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref> indicates that the data fit for the five-factor model was better than that for the alternative models, suggesting its suitability for further research.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Fit of confirmatory factor analysis.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Factor model</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>/df</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">CFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">TLI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">RMSEA</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SRMR</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Baseline model<break/>Five-factor model</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.012</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.935</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.942</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.060</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.049</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Alternative models<break/>Four-factor model</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.031</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.860</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.900</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.094</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.076</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Three-factor model</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.865</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.855</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.841</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.100</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.092</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Two-factor model</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.234</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.807</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.818</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.125</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.143</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>N =&#x202F;322. Four-factor model&#x202F;=&#x202F;Conscientiousness and workload loading on one common factor; Three-factor model&#x202F;=&#x202F;Conscientiousness, TAW, and workload on one common factor; Two-factor model&#x202F;=&#x202F;Conscientiousness, TAW, workload, and work engagement loading on one common factor.</italic></p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Rigorous procedural controls were implemented before and during the survey to mitigate the effects of CMV on the study results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">37</xref>). However, as the same participants were involved in different measurements, Harman&#x2019;s single-factor test was used to examine the presence of CMV. The results show that 10 factors were extracted from the nonrotating principal component analysis, accounting for 73.45% of the total variance, among which the first factor explained 20.15%. This percentage does not constitute the majority, indicating that the CMV does not influence the results.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Descriptive statistics and correlations</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>, conscientiousness was significantly and positively correlated with work engagement (<italic>r</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.480, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001), workload (<italic>r</italic> =&#x202F;0.186, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05), and TAW (<italic>r</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.410, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01). Additionally, TAW is significantly positively correlated with work engagement (<italic>r</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.509, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01), whereas workload is significantly and negatively correlated with work engagement (<italic>r</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;0.298, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). These results provide the initial evidence to test our hypotheses.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation coefficient and descriptive statistical analysis of variables.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Variables</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">1</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">2</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">3</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">4</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">5</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">6</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">7</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">8</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">9</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">10</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">1. Gender</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2. Age</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.081</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">3. Education</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.014</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.223</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">4. organizational tenure</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.162</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.431<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.074</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">5. Position</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.158</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.145</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.160</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.122</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">6. Conscientiousness</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.011</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.100</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.042</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.181</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.065</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">7. TAW</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.047</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.102</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.037</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.095</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.084</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.410<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">8. Work Engagement</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.133</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.056</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.013</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.212</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.114</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.480<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.509<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">9. Workload</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.185</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.147</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.081</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.053</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.072</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.295<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.182</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.298<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">10.PIS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.031</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.162</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.023</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.08</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.251</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.186<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.594<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.249</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.160</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">M</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.587</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.46</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.48</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.72</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.435</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.359</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.509</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.518</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.543</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.286</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SD</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.501</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.832</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.679</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.886</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.501</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.3978</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.264</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.415</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.624</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.691</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>N</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;322. &#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x003C;0.05. &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x003C;0.01. &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x003C;0.001.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Hypothesis testing</title>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>4.3.1</label>
<title>Mediation effects test</title>
<p>The PROCESS macro was used to test the research models. Model 4 was selected using 5,000 bootstrap samples and a 95% confidence interval (CI). First, we tested the mediating effect of TAW. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>, conscientiousness had a significant positive impact on both TAW (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.303, 95% CI [0.076, 0.471]) and work engagement (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.591, 95% CI [0.302, 0.880]). In addition, the positive indirect effect of conscientiousness on work engagement via TAW was significant (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.326, 95% CI [0.120, 0.731]). Thus, H1 is supported.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Mediation Effect Test of TAW.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Variables</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Outcome variable: TAW</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Outcome variable: work engagement</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Outcome variable: work engagement</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x03B2;</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x03B2;</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x03B2;</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">CI</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Gender</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.043</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.279,0.266]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.218</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[0.104,0.539]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.241</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.063,0.545]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Age</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.034</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.322,0.314]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.010</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.446,0.445]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.018</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.402,0.439]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Education</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.052</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.235,0.101]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.014</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[0.181,0.209]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.042</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.143,0.228]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">organizational tenure</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.092</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0176,0.325]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.089</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.198,0.377]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.039</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.235,0.314]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Position</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.025</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.263,0.303]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.017</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.353,0.319]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.031</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.347,0.286]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Conscientiousness</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.303</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[0.076,0.471]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.591</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[0.302,0.880]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.326</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[0.120,0.731]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">TAW</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.445</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[0.091,0.999]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">R<sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">0.254</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">0.333</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">0.423</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>F</italic>-value</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">2.214<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">3.244<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">3.975<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>N</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;322. &#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x003C;0.05. &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x003C;0.01.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Second, we tested the mediating effect of workload. As indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>, conscientiousness had a significantly positive impact on workload (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.388, 95% CI [0.085, 0.860]), and the negative indirect effect of conscientiousness on work engagement via workload was significant (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;0.336, 95% CI [&#x2212;0.504, &#x2212;0.168]). Thus, H2 is supported. Furthermore, when TAW and workload were simultaneously included as mediating variables, the results (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>) show that the indirect effect of conscientiousness on work engagement via both TAW (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.493, 95% CI [0.128, 0.557]) and workload (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;0.219, 95% CI [&#x2212;0.399,-0.109]) was significant. Therefore, H1 and H2 were further validated.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>The mediation effect of workload and double mediation effect test.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Variables</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Outcome variable: workload</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Outcome variable: work engagement</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Outcome variable: work engagement</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="middle">&#x03B2;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">95% CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">&#x03B2;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">95% CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">&#x03B2;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">95% CI</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Gender</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.160</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.986,0.066]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.063</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.220,0.346]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.082</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.171,0.335]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Age</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.052</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.280,0.177]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.186</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.574,0.203]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.173</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.020,0.174]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Education</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.067</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.250,0.386]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.036</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.129,0.202]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.068</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.081,0.217]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">organizational tenure</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.032</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.139,0.802]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.201</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.050,0.451]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.151</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.074,0.176]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Position</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.198</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.051,0.047]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.150</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.353,0.319]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.142</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.122,0.107]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Conscientiousness</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.388</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[0.085,0.860]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.722</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.146,0.447]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.547</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[0.297,0.797]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Workload</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.336</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.504,-0.168]</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.219</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[&#x2212;0.399,-0.109]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">TAW</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.493</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">[0.128,0.557]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">R<sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">0.211</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">0.534</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">0.639</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">F-value</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">1.736<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">6.215<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">1.736<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>N</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;322. &#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x003C;0.05. &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x003C;0.01. &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x003C;0.001.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>4.3.2</label>
<title>Moderation effects and moderated mediation test</title>
<p>Further, we use Model 7 in the Process to test the moderation and moderated mediation effects. The interactive effects of conscientiousness and PIS on TAW were positive and significant (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.142, 95% CI (0.004, 0.301)). Thus, H3 is supported. The plot in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows that when PIS is higher, conscientiousness is more positively associated with TAW. In addition, the interactive effects of conscientiousness and PIS on workload were negative and significant (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;0.161, 95% CI (&#x2212;0.245, &#x2212;0.062)). Thus, H4 is supported. The plot in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> indicates that when PIS was lower, conscientiousness was more positively associated with workload.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Moderating role of PIS in the relationship between conscientiousness and TAW.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpubh-13-1506454-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Moderating role of PIS in the relationship between conscientiousness and workload.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpubh-13-1506454-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The moderated mediation effects for H5 and H6 were tested, and the results are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref>. The differences between the indirect effects of conscientiousness on work engagement via TAW (moderated mediation index&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.101, 95%CI [0.063, 0.621]) and workload (moderated mediation index&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.352, 95%CI [0.078, 0.415]) at higher and lower PIS were both significant. Therefore, H5 and H6 are supported.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Results of moderated mediation tests.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Path</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Estimate(SE)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">95% CI</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="3">Conscientiousness&#x2192; TAW&#x2192; Work engagement</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">High PIS(M&#x202F;+&#x202F;SD)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.318(0.216)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[0.129,0.879]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Low PIS (M-SD)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.017(0.161)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[&#x2212;0.130,0.156]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Estimate difference</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.101(0.115)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[0.063,0.621]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="3">Conscientiousness&#x2192; workload&#x2192; Work engagement</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">High PIS(M&#x202F;+&#x202F;SD)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.024</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[&#x2212;0.323,0.093]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Low PIS (M-SD)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.376</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[&#x2212;0.578,-0.184]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Estimate difference</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.352</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">[0.078, 0.415]</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion and general discussion</title>
<sec id="sec21">
<label>5.1</label>
<title>Theoretical contributions</title>
<p>First, this study enriches the existing research findings on conscientiousness and employee work engagement. The conscientiousness and work engagement of medical staff in China are closely correlated with the quality of medical care and doctor&#x2013;patient relationships. Scholars have investigated the correlation between conscientiousness and research productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">40</xref>), well-being (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>), and other factors. However, limited research has specifically connected conscientiousness to the work engagement of medical staff. This study added variables such as workload and work engagement to the comprehensive model of conscientiousness, expanding the research on outcome variables, and provided a new theoretical perspective on how conscientiousness as a personality trait drives the work engagement of medical staff.</p>
<p>Second, this study revealed the double-edged sword effect of conscientiousness on employee work engagement and its impact process. Previous studies focused predominantly on the positive impact of conscientiousness on individual work states (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>). Recent research in personality theory has introduced the &#x201C;too-much-of-a-good-thing effect&#x201D; in the relationship between conscientiousness and ideal outcomes, challenging the &#x201C;more is better&#x201D; view that has been dominating research on this trait for a long time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">41</xref>). However, little is known regarding how conscientiousness leads to negative outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>). We develop an integrative model that provides a balanced and dialectical understanding of the impact of conscientiousness. It simultaneously promotes our understanding of the consequences of conscientiousness from the &#x201C;bright&#x201D; and &#x201C;dark&#x201D; sides. This study fills a research gap regarding the effectiveness of the impact of conscientiousness and provides a broader perspective on the systematic comprehension of the role of conscientiousness in academia. These findings also expanded the application of COR theory by sustaining the view that not all behaviors deemed &#x201C;good&#x201D; can realize resource enhancement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">42</xref>).</p>
<p>Third, we expand the boundary condition of the conscientiousness&#x2013;work engagement linkage. China emphasizes collectivism and PIS has research significance in the Chinese cultural context (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">43</xref>). This study introduced PIS as a moderating variable, providing new boundary conditions for exploring the relationship between conscientiousness and medical staff work states. It confirms the impact of PIS on the relationships between conscientiousness, TAW/workload, and work engagement, enriching research that uses PIS as a moderating variable. This provides a new perspective for improving TAW of medical staff and providing interventions in their workloads. However, the integration of PIS with personality trait factors provides important insights for future research on its effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<label>5.2</label>
<title>Practical implications</title>
<p>First, public hospitals should stimulate a sense of conscientiousness among medical staff. In organizational environments, conscientiousness significantly affects employees&#x2019; work attitudes, behaviors, and performance. However, this impact may be negative. Therefore, organizations need to provide relevant training to employees to strengthen their passion for their profession and work. Simultaneously, it is important to remind employees to be mindful of resource depletion, while focusing on their work and to manage their sense of conscientiousness more dynamically.</p>
<p>Second, public hospitals should create a working environment conducive to improving the TAW and reducing the experience of workload for medical staff. On the one hand, creating a working atmosphere characterized by respect and trust from superiors and colleagues, expanding avenues for accessing work-related information, optimizing information dissemination methods, establishing an environment conducive to sharing information and resources, and enabling medical staff to achieve their ideal work state. Public hospitals should employ measures to prevent and intervene in the high workload of medical staff and reduce the perceived burden caused by emotional, physical, and mental resource depletion, thereby lowering the burden efficiency caused by a sense of conscientiousness. Specific measures may include (1) collaborating with the HRM departments of public hospitals to establish relevant support mechanisms, such as stipulating that medical staff must take paid leave each year and generally do not allow explicit or implicit overtime; (2) providing employees with health promotion programs and regularly conducting group/individual physical and mental intervention measures; and (3) establishing an adequate pool of specialized and flexible human resources to address high-intensity medical service work at any time.</p>
<p>Finally, public hospitals should consider PIS as a self-concept factor. Medical staff with higher levels of PIS are better equipped to experience work vitality and prosperity guided by conscientiousness. They can handle job tasks calmly, reduce the sense of being overwhelmed, and increase their levels of work engagement. Therefore, public hospitals can improve the PIS of medical staff by granting them more autonomy, enhancing their professional skills in performing job tasks, assisting them in overcoming work difficulties, creating more career opportunities, and ultimately boosting their PIS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec23">
<label>5.3</label>
<title>Limitations and future research directions</title>
<p>This study reached a relatively comprehensive conclusion through empirical analysis; however, it still has limitations that require further refinement in future research. First, the use of homogeneous data may have introduced bias. Despite the tests showing that the CMV is not severe, future research should use multisource and longitudinal data to minimize such biases. Second, contextual factors such as organizational context, leadership styles, and job characteristics may also moderate employees&#x2019; work attitudes and behaviors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>). Future studies could use contextual factors such as organizational support and environmental uncertainty (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">45</xref>) as moderating variables to further explore the boundary conditions that influence conscientiousness. Third, due to the limitations of the study conditions, the sample was drawn from only four public hospitals in China. Van et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">46</xref>) noted that individuals&#x2019; cultural contexts influence their informational and cognitive processes, which drives the construction of specific cognitive interpretative models. Therefore, future research should consider collecting data from other countries, while selecting other specific industries (such as education and legal practice) to enhance sample diversity and improve the generalizability of the research results.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec24">
<label>6</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Based on the COR and social exchange theory, we investigated the double-edged sword effect of conscientiousness on work engagement among medical staff in public hospitals. The results indicate that (1) conscientiousness has a positive indirect effect on work engagement via TAW, and the indirect effect is stronger when PIS is higher than when lower; furthermore, (2) conscientiousness has a negative indirect effect on work engagement via workload, and the indirect effect is stronger when PIS is lower than when it is higher. Given that the literature on the double-edged sword effect of conscientiousness is still in its infancy, we hope that our study is a step toward gaining a more complete understanding of conscientiousness and their effects on employee work states.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec25">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec26">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving humans were approved by the 376 Academic Research Board of Lianyungang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec27">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>HS: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing &#x2013; original draft. XH: Conceptualization, Software, Writing &#x2013; original draft. SW: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. LS: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec28">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. We appreciate the financial support of the National Social Science Foundation of China (grant no. 22BJY036) and the Health Science and Technology Project of Lianyungang (grant no. 202319).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec29">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec30">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec31">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Theoretical model construction of doctor overwork genesis</article-title>. <source>Chin Hosp</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19660/j.issn.1671-0592.2024.6.02</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Analysis on the status-quo and influencing factors of medical disputes in the IIIA hospitals&#x2014;&#x2014;based on the perspective of doctors, patients and family members</article-title>. <source>Health Econ Res</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>36</volume>:<fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14055/j.cnki.33-1056/f.2019.12.019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Study on effect of logistics enterprise employee's conscientiousness on its working performance under accountability systems</article-title>. <source>Logist Technol</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>33</volume>:<fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1005-152X.2014.06.033</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Junca-Silva</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Camaz</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A longitudinal approach to disentangle how conscientiousness creates happy people: the mediating role of self-leadership and the moderating role of perceived leadership effectiveness</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>e16893</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16893</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37360082</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>M-L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Trait conscientiousness, thriving at work, career satisfaction and job satisfaction: can supervisor support make a difference?</article-title> <source>Personal Individ Differ</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>183</volume>:<fpage>111116</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.paid.2021.111116</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>When and why conscientious employees are proactive: a three-wave investigation on employees' conscientiousness and organizational proactive behavior</article-title>. <source>Personal Individ Differ</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>159</volume>:<fpage>109865</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.paid.2020.109865</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39822849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Enabling and burdening: the double-edged sword of conscientiousness</article-title>. <source>Personal Individ Differ</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>184</volume>:<fpage>111216</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.paid.2021.111216</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39822849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tisu</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lup&#x0219;a</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>V&#x00EE;rg&#x0103;</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rusu</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Personality characteristics, job performance and mental health: the mediating role of work engagement</article-title>. <source>Personal Individ Differ</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>153</volume>:<fpage>109644</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.paid.2019.109644</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39822849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The influence of doctor-nurse cooperation on nurses' working involvement</article-title>. <source>Chin Nurs Manag</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>754</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2016.06.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hobfoll</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress</article-title>. <source>Am Psychol</source>. (<year>1989</year>) <volume>44</volume>:<fpage>513</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2648906</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stamper</surname> <given-names>CL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Masterson</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Insider or outsider? How employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behavior</article-title>. <source>J Organ Behav</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>23</volume>:<fpage>875</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/job.175</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lan</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>IA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fong</surname> <given-names>VHI</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Duality of conscientiousness and service knowledge growth: the role of self-efficacy and self-deception</article-title>. <source>J Hosp Tour Manag</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>54</volume>:<fpage>426</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.02.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anasori</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bayighomog</surname> <given-names>SW</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Vita</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Altinay</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The mediating role of psychological distress between ostracism, work engagement, and turnover intentions: an analysis in the Cypriot hospitality context</article-title>. <source>Int J Hosp Manag</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>94</volume>:<fpage>102829</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102829</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39822849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spreitzer</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sutcliffe</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dutton</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sonenshein</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grant</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A socially embedded model of thriving at work</article-title>. <source>Organ Sci</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>537</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1287/orsc.1050.0153</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19642375</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hobfoll</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Halbesleben</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neveu</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Westman</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences</article-title>. <source>Annu Rev Organ Psych Organ Behav</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>103</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Political skill amplifies the beneficial effects of leader humor on actors&#x2019; work engagement via psychological capital</article-title>. <source>J B Res</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>182</volume>:<fpage>114775</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114775</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McLarty</surname> <given-names>BD</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muldoon</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quade</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>King</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Your boss is the problem and solution: how supervisor-induced hindrance stressors and LMX influence employee job neglect and subsequent performance</article-title>. <source>J B Res</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>130</volume>:<fpage>308</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.032</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>XY</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A dual-path model of work-family conflict and hospitality employees&#x2019; job and life satisfaction</article-title>. <source>J Hosp Tour Manag</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>58</volume>:<fpage>154</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.12.008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barrick</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mount</surname> <given-names>MK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Autonomy as a moderator of the relationship between the big five personality dimensions and job performance</article-title>. <source>J Appl Psychol</source>. (<year>1993</year>) <volume>78</volume>:<fpage>111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.111</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sethi</surname> <given-names>UJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Support from superior a mediator between conscientiousness and work engagement</article-title>. <source>Int J Bus Strateg</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>13</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18374/IJBS-17-2.2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alikaj</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ning</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Proactive personality and creative behavior: examining the role of thriving at work and high-involvement HR practices</article-title>. <source>J Bus Psychol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>36</volume>:<fpage>857</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>69</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10869-020-09704-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39823079</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Strauss</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Griffin</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parker</surname> <given-names>SK</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Future work selves: how salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career behaviors</article-title>. <source>J Appl Psychol</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>97</volume>:<fpage>580</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>98</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/a0026423</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22122111</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Imran</surname> <given-names>MY</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elahi</surname> <given-names>NS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abid</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ashfaq</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ilyas</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Impact of perceived organizational support on work engagement: mediating mechanism of thriving and flourishing</article-title>. <source>J Open Innov: Technol Mark Complex</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>82</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/joitmc6030082</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39800344</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>TC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Enkhbat</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gray</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zakharin</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>How to get things done: tight linkage of conscientiousness with twelve mechanisms of goal setting theory</article-title>. <source>Personal Individ Differ</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>214</volume>:<fpage>112331</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.paid.2023.112331</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39822849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spector</surname> <given-names>PE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jex</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory</article-title>. <source>J Occup Health Psychol</source>. (<year>1998</year>) <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>356</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.356</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9805281</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bedwell</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leygue</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goulden</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAuley</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Colley</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Apportioning energy consumption in the workplace: a review of issues in using metering data to motivate staff to save energy</article-title>. <source>Tech Anal Strat Manag</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>26</volume>:<fpage>1196</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>211</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09537325.2014.978276</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A double-edged sword: the moderating role of conscientiousness in the relationships between work stressors, psychological strain, and job performance</article-title>. <source>J Organ Behav</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>36</volume>:<fpage>94</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>111</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/job.1949</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39814823</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><label>28.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maslach</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schaufeli</surname> <given-names>WB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leiter</surname> <given-names>MP</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Job burnout</article-title>. <source>Annu Rev Psychol</source>. (<year>2003</year>) <volume>52</volume>:<fpage>397</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>422</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11148311</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><label>29.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>The level of self-rated workload among clinical nurses and its impact on work engagement</article-title>. <source>J Nurs Sci</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>35</volume>:<fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.17.057</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><label>30.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blau</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Exchange and power in social life</source>. <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Wiley</publisher-name>. (<year>1964</year>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><label>31.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Does ethical leadership contribute to employee creativity behavior? &#x2014; the mediating role of perceived insider status and the moderating role of vertical collectivism</article-title>. <source>Chin Hum Resour Dev</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>32</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16471/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2017.11.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><label>32.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levett-Jones</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lathlean</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The ascent to competence conceptual framework: an outcome of a study of belongingness</article-title>. <source>J Clin Nurs</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>2870</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02593.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19220619</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><label>33.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moon</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Justice perceptions, perceived insider status, and gossip at work: a social exchange perspective</article-title>. <source>J Bus Res</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>97</volume>:<fpage>30</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.038</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><label>34.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H-J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le Blanc</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Demerouti</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>C-Q</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A social identity perspective on the association between leader-member exchange and job insecurity</article-title>. <source>Eur J Work Organ Psychol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<fpage>800</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1359432x.2019.1653853</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><label>35.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The mechanism of team-member exchange on knowledge hiding under the background of &#x201C;Guanxi&#x201D;</article-title>. <source>J Bus Res</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>148</volume>:<fpage>304</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.063</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><label>36.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beehr</surname> <given-names>TA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jex</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stacy</surname> <given-names>BA</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murray</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Work stressors and coworker support as predictors of individual strain and job performance</article-title>. <source>J Organ Behav</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>391</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>405</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200006)21:4&#x003C;391::AID-JOB15&#x003E;3.0.CO;2-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><label>37.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Podsakoff</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Podsakoff</surname> <given-names>NP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>LJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Common method bias: It's bad, it's complex, it's widespread, and it's not easy to fix</article-title>. <source>Ann Re Organ Psycho Organ Behav</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><label>38.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McCrae</surname> <given-names>RR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>PT</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Adding liebe und arbeit: the full five-factor model and well-being</article-title>. <source>Personal Soc Psychol Bull</source>. (<year>1991</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>227</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/014616729101700217</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><label>39.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schaufeli</surname> <given-names>WB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bakker</surname> <given-names>AB</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salanova</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire</article-title>. <source>Educ Psychol Meas</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>66</volume>:<fpage>701</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0013164405282471</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><label>40.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lindahl</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Conscientiousness predicts doctoral students&#x2019; research productivity</article-title>. <source>J Inf Secur</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>101353</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.joi.2022.101353</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39822849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><label>41.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dupr&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heyde</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vergauwe</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wille</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Too little, just right or too much? Assessing how people evaluate their conscientiousness levels</article-title>. <source>Personal Individ Differ</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>197</volume>:<fpage>111789</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.paid.2022.111789</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39822849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><label>42.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Halbesleben</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wheeler</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>To invest or not? The role of coworker support and trust in daily reciprocal gain spirals of helping behavior</article-title>. <source>Aust J Manag</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>41</volume>:<fpage>1628</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0149206312455246</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39807426</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><label>43.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Obtaining by morality: effect of ethical leadership on employees&#x2019; green behavior</article-title>. <source>J Beijing Univ Posts Telecommun (Soc Sci Ed)</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>25</volume>:<fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>84</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19722/j.cnki.1008-7729.2023.0078</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><label>44.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A study of the impact mechanism of workplace ostracism on the deviance behavior of the new generation of employees: a moderated mediation model</article-title>. <source>Sci Res Manag</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>43</volume>:<fpage>182</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2022.12.019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><label>45.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Do conscientious leaders abuse subordinates? The role of environmental uncertainty and emotional exhaustion</article-title>. <source>J Psychol Sci</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>44</volume>:<fpage>1164</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20210519</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><label>46.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Knippenberg</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Dreu</surname> <given-names>CK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Homan</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda</article-title>. <source>J Appl Psychol</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>89</volume>:<fpage>1008</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15584838</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>