Front. Public Health Frontiers in Public Health Front. Public Health 2296-2565 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1467571 Public Health Review Social capital and physical activity: a literature review up to March 2024 Gao Zhendong 1 Chee Chen Soon 1 * Omar Dev Roxana Dev 1 Liu Yutong 2 * Gao Jianhong 1 Li Rui 1 Li Fangyi 1 Liu Xiaoxiao 1 Wang Tao 1 1Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia 2Department of Sports Teaching and Research, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China

Edited by: Daniela Stackeová, College of Physical Education and Sport Palestra, Czechia

Reviewed by: John R. Tower, Victoria University, Australia

Yoshiharu Fukuda, Teikyo University, Japan

 *Correspondence: Chen Soon Chee cschee@upm.edu.my Yutong Liu liuyutong@lzu.edu.cn 12 02 2025 2025 13 1467571 20 07 2024 27 01 2025 Copyright © 2025 Gao, Chee, Omar Dev, Liu, Gao, Li, Li, Liu and Wang. 2025 Gao, Chee, Omar Dev, Liu, Gao, Li, Li, Liu and Wang

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 Background

Social capital, as a multidimensional social science concept, plays a crucial role in promoting physical activity. Despite numerous studies exploring the relationship between social capital and physical activity, there is still a lack of systematic understanding of how different dimensions of social capital influence physical activity levels. This study aims to systematically review the literature up to 2024 on the relationship between social capital and physical activity, uncover the role of social capital in promoting physical activity, and identify its multidimensional impacts.

 Methods

We used a combination of search terms including “social capital” and “physical activity” to search the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, SportDiscus, and PsychINFO databases for English literature published up to March 1, 2024.

 Results

We identified 2,021 unique articles and reviewed 115 studies that met our inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated various dimensions of social capital, with key dimensions including social participation (34%), social networks (30%), social cohesion (30%), social trust (29%), overall social network (26%), social support (19%), safety (19%), norms of reciprocity (13%), social control (10%), satisfaction with the environment (8%), collective efficacy (4%), norms for physical activity (3%), and voting (1%). In studies exploring the relationship between social capital and physical activity, the majority of positive results in the hypothesized direction were observed in dimensions such as social cohesion, trust, participation, reciprocity, satisfaction with the environment, and overall social networks. In contrast, dimensions such as voting, collective efficacy, safety, control, and physical activity norms predominantly showed null or negative results. The results for social support were mixed, displaying positive, negative, and null outcomes, while findings for social networks were also predominantly mixed.

 Conclusion

This study reveals the significant role of social capital in promoting physical activity, particularly in the dimensions of social cohesion, social trust, social participation, norms of reciprocity, satisfaction with environment, and overall social network. When designing public health interventions in the future, it is crucial to tailor strategies to different populations and contexts to better leverage social capital in promoting physical activity.

 social capital physical activity public health social cohesion social trust social participation norms of reciprocity social networks section-at-acceptance Public Health Education and Promotion 1 Introduction

In the field of public health, understanding, and promoting physical activity has become a crucial issue (1–3), especially in the context of the global rise in chronic diseases and mental health problems (4–6). Physical activity not only reduces the risk of heart disease, diabetes, and certain cancers but also significantly enhances psychological well-being and overall quality of life (7–9). Despite the well-known benefits of physical activity, activity levels are influenced by various factors, including biological, environmental, psychological, and social factors (10–12). Among these factors, the role of social capital has increasingly garnered the attention of researchers as strategies to promote physical activity continue to be explored in the field of public health (13–15).

Social capital, as a multidimensional social science concept, has become a significant topic of research in public health, psychology, and sociology over the past few decades (16–18). Although the definition and measurement of social capital remain contentious, there is a scholarly consensus on its core elements, which include social networks, social participation, trust, reciprocity, and shared norms (19, 20). Generally, social capital is defined as the resources and advantages individuals or groups derive from their social networks, typically acquired through social interactions, trust relationships, and community participation (19, 21). The key dimensions of social capital involve personal attributes such as the quality and quantity of social networks, social support, and information channels, as well as collective attributes like the degree of mutual trust among community members and shared social norms and values (21, 22).

Social capital can be further subdivided into various operational types or dimensions, including structural and cognitive; bonding, bridging, and linking; strong and weak ties; and horizontal and vertical (20, 23, 24). Cognitive social capital can be understood as individuals' perceptions of interpersonal trust, sharing, and reciprocity (21). Structural social capital refers to the density of social networks or patterns of civic participation (21). Bonding social capital pertains to relationships within homogenous groups, such as those among family members, neighbors, close friends, and colleagues, also known as strong ties (24). Bridging social capital involves connections between individuals or groups across different power structures, such as those linking diverse racial and occupational backgrounds, referred to as weak ties (24). Linking social capital is considered the respect and trust relationships that exist among people interacting across formal or institutionalized power or authority gradients in society (24–26). Among these, bonding and bridging social capital are regarded as horizontal social capital, while linking social capital is seen as vertical social capital (24).

The importance of social capital lies in its inclusion of both individual-level interactions and relationships as well as group or community-level cooperation and cohesion (21). Previous studies have indicated that social capital is considered a protective health factor (27). Some research also suggests that high levels of social capital are associated with numerous positive health outcomes, such as lower mortality rates, better mental health, and reduced crime and violence (17, 20, 28). Although some researchers have pointed out potential “negative effects” of social capital on health outcomes (29) or found its effects to be insignificant (28), there remains substantial evidence linking social capital with self-rated health (22, 30).

In the context of the relationship between social capital and physical activity, qualitative studies have found that social capital is regarded as a key resource for initiating and maintaining physical activity (31). Research indicates that strong social networks and high levels of social participation at the individual level can encourage more active lifestyles, including regular physical activity (32–34). Community-level reciprocity and neighborhood trust norms are associated with higher levels of physical activity among urban adults (15). High social capital has been shown to be associated with regular Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) in boys and with overall physical activity in girls (35). Additionally, social capital can promote physical activity through the dissemination of health information (14). However, it is important to note that the relationship between social capital and physical activity may vary across different populations, influenced by factors such as age, gender, socioeconomic status, and culture (36–38).

To our knowledge, most systematic reviews on the relationship between social capital and health have primarily focused on broad health outcomes and public health interventions (16, 17, 30), and there has not been a systematic review specifically addressing the relationship between social capital and physical activity. Furthermore, scholars have emphasized the need for future research to focus on the multidimensionality and multi-layered perspectives of social capital (16, 17). In light of this, the present study aims to systematically review relevant literature to deeply explore the heterogeneous evidence of the impact of the multiple dimensions of social capital on physical activity, thereby filling the current research gap. By identifying effective social capital-building strategies and their applicability across different social and cultural contexts, we hope to provide new insights for public health practice and policy-making to leverage social capital at the policy level to improve public health outcomes.

 2 Methods

Based on previous systematic reviews on related topics (28, 30, 39), we conducted an English literature search in March 2024 using the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, SportDiscus, and PsychINFO databases, with a cut-off date of March 1, 2024. These databases were selected for their high credibility and wide recognition in the fields of public health and sports science. We used a combination of search terms including “social capital” and “physical activity.” The specific search strategy is detailed in Table 1. We excluded abstracts, conference proceedings, dissertations, book chapters, and articles published in non-peer-reviewed journals.

Search strategy.

Type of database Searching type Result
Web of science #1 KP =(“social capital” OR “social cohesion” OR “collective efficacy” OR “social trust” OR “social networks” OR “social participation” OR “social engagement” OR “social integration” OR “social relationships” OR “social ties” OR “reciprocity” OR “social connections” OR “social connectedness”) AND KP =(“physical activity” OR “motor activity” OR “physical exertion” OR “sports” OR “exercise” OR “leisure physical activities” OR “leisure activities” OR “physical exercise” OR “physical inactivity”) and Article (Document Types) and English (Languages) #2 TI= (“social capital” OR “social cohesion” OR “collective efficacy” OR “social trust” OR “social networks” OR “social participation” OR “social engagement” OR “social integration” OR “social relationships” OR “social ties” OR “reciprocity” OR “social connections” OR “social connectedness”) AND TI= (“physical activity” OR “motor activity” OR “physical exertion” OR “sports” OR “exercise” OR “leisure physical activities” OR “leisure activities” OR “physical exercise” OR “physical inactivity”) and Article (Document Types) and English (Languages) #3 #1 OR #2 620
Pubmed (“social capital” [Title/Abstract] OR “social cohesion” [Title/Abstract] OR “collective efficacy” [Title/Abstract] OR “social trust” [Title/Abstract] OR “social networks” [Title/Abstract] OR “social engagement” [Title/Abstract]) AND “social participation” [Title/Abstract] OR “social integration” [Title/Abstract] OR “social relationships” [Title/Abstract] OR “social ties” [Title/Abstract] OR “reciprocity” [Title/Abstract] OR “social connections” [Title/Abstract] OR “social connectedness” [Title/Abstract]) AND (“physical activity” [Title/Abstract] OR “motor activity” [Title/Abstract] OR “physical exertion” [Title/Abstract] OR “sports” [Title/Abstract] OR “exercise” [Title/Abstract] OR “leisure physical activities” [Title/Abstract] OR “leisure activities” [Title/Abstract] OR “physical exercise” [Title/Abstract] OR “physical inactivity” [Title/Abstract]) 187
Scopus (TITLE-ABS-KEY (“social capital” OR “social cohesion” OR “collective efficacy” OR “social trust” OR “social networks” OR “social engagement” “social participation” OR “social integration” OR “social relationships” OR “social ties” OR “reciprocity” OR “social connections” OR “social connectedness”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“physical activity” OR “motor activity” OR “physical exertion” OR “sports” OR “exercise” OR “leisure physical activities” OR “leisure activities” OR “physical exercise” OR “physical inactivity”)) 439
SportDiscus AB (“social capital” OR “social cohesion” OR “collective efficacy” OR “social trust” OR “social networks” OR “social participation” OR “social engagement” OR “social integration” OR “social relationships” OR “social ties” OR “reciprocity” OR “social connections” OR “social connectedness”) AND AB (“physical activity” OR “motor activity” OR “physical exertion” OR “sports” OR “exercise” OR “leisure physical activities” OR “leisure activities” OR “physical exercise” OR “physical inactivity”) 456
PsychINFO title((“social capital” OR “social cohesion” OR “collective efficacy” OR “social trust” OR “social networks” OR “social participation” OR “social engagement” OR “social integration” OR “social relationships” OR “social ties” OR “reciprocity” OR “social connections” OR “social connectedness”)) AND title((“physical activity” OR “motor activity” OR “physical exertion” OR “sports” OR “exercise” OR “leisure physical activities” OR “leisure activities” OR “physical exercise” OR “physical inactivity”)) OR if((“social capital” OR “social cohesion” OR “collective efficacy” OR “social trust” OR “social networks” OR “social participation” OR “social engagement” OR “social integration” OR “social relationships” OR “social ties” OR “reciprocity” OR “social connections” OR “social connectedness”)) AND if((“physical activity” OR “motor activity” OR “physical exertion” OR “sports” OR “exercise” OR “leisure physical activities” OR “leisure activities” OR “physical exercise” OR “physical inactivity”)) 319

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Studies focusing on the relationship between social capital and physical activity, including observational studies (cross-sectional studies, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies) and randomized controlled trials; (2) Studies that conducted formal hypothesis testing on the relationship between measures of social capital and physical activity; (3) Studies that measured physical activity using objective methods or subjective assessments, including but not limited to frequency, duration, and intensity of participation; (4) Studies that included at least one measure of social capital; (5) Studies published in peer-reviewed journals in English up to March 1, 2024.

The exclusion criteria were: (1) Studies that did not provide direct results on the association between measures of social capital and physical activity; (2) Reviews, opinion articles, or theoretical papers; (3) Studies where physical activity outcomes were indirectly obtained or measured through exercise behavior or exercise psychology; (4) Studies that were not available in full text or had incomplete data; (5) Studies that only included measures of social support. We excluded studies focusing solely on social support, as there are numerous reviews on this topic (39–41). We will focus on explaining social capital through the lens of social cohesion, as the search terms for social capital inevitably reveal methods based on social support and social cohesion (16, 30).

The search process involved a layered evaluation and adhered to the PRISMA guidelines (42) to ensure systematic and transparent literature screening. Initially, the identified literature was downloaded into Endnote X7 after removing duplicates, and studies were selected based on their titles and abstracts. Subsequently, the full texts of the remaining studies were retrieved and assessed for eligibility. If necessary, both abstracts and full texts were screened. The search and selection process was independently conducted by four researchers (ZG, YL, JG, and RL). Any discrepancies regarding the inclusion of specific studies were resolved through consensus meetings. If consensus could not be reached, the final decision on inclusion or exclusion was made by researchers (CC and RO). The basic information of each retrieved article (i.e., author, publication year, and article title) was recorded by the author (ZG) in a Microsoft Excel® spreadsheet to ensure comprehensive tracking and review.

The data extraction process was carried out independently by five reviewers (ZG, YL, JG, RL, and FL) following standardized methods for systematic reviews. In cases of disagreement, the reviewers consulted researchers (CC and RO), and discrepancies were resolved through consensus. Key elements from each study were extracted and summarized in a table, organized chronologically by publication year. For each study, the table included the following: the first author and year of publication, sample information (size, characteristics, and location), study design (cross-sectional, prospective, or experimental), measures of social capital, measures of physical activity, covariates included as control variables, and main statistical results (effect estimates and/or significance of hypothesis testing). Bolded terms in the table indicated statistically significant results.

Additionally, we summarized the distribution of study outcomes, indicating whether the study authors reported “positive” results (significant associations in the hypothesized direction), “negative” results (negative and/or null associations), or “mixed” results (both positive and negative/null associations).

 3 Results 3.1 Study selection

As shown in the PRISMA flow diagram [Figure 1, (42)], the initial search yielded 2,021 published papers. After removing duplicates, 1,778 papers remained. Upon reviewing titles and abstracts, 1,257 papers were further excluded because they did not focus on the relationship between social capital and physical activity (n = 1,056) or were reviews, opinion articles, or theoretical papers (n = 201). Of the remaining 521 papers, 406 were excluded after full-text review for the following reasons: providing measures that included only social support (n = 14), no results exploring the association between social capital and physical activity (n = 356), using non-applicable methods to measure physical activity (n = 33), and not being available in full text (n = 3). Consequently, 115 papers were included in this systematic review.

PRISMA flow diagram showing the process of study selection.

 3.2 Study characteristics

This review summarizes the characteristics of the 115 included studies (see Supplementary Material 1 for details). Table 2 provides a summary of these characteristics. Among them, 89 (77%) studies used a cross-sectional design, and 26 (23%) used a longitudinal design. 53 (46%) studies involved samples from the United States, 10 (9%) involved samples from China, and 8 (7%) involved samples from Japan/Canada. Four (3%) studies each involved samples from Brazil/Sweden, and the remaining 28 studies involved samples from 24 different countries. The total sample size of the included studies reached 1,328,785, with 22 (19%) studies having a sample size of over 10,000 and 69 (60%) studies having a sample size of over 1,000. Seventeen (15%) studies used nationally representative data. The sample age range in the included studies was from 6 to 91 years. Twenty-four (21%) studies focused on samples of minors. The majority (79%) of the studies focused on adults, with 40 (44%) studies primarily involving middle-aged and older adults (50 years and above). Covariates controlled at the individual level included age (95%), gender (71%), education level (62%), marital status (30%), and race/ethnicity (27%). Ten percent of the studies included regional-level covariates (neighborhood, school, county). Additionally, 43% of the studies controlled for health-related covariates, and 24% controlled for socioeconomic status-related covariates.

Summary of characteristics of the 115 included studies.

Characteristic Number Proportion (%)
Study design
- Cross-sectional design 89 77%
- Longitudinal design 26 23%
Sample sources by country
- The United States 53 46%
- China 10 9%
- Japan/Canada 8 7%
- Brazil/Sweden 4 3%
- Other 24 countries 28 24%
Total sample size 1,328,785 100%
Studies with large samples (>1,000) 69 60%
- Including samples >10,000 22 19%
Studies using nationally representative data 17 15%
Sample age range (years) 6–91
Studies focused on minors 24 21%
Studies focused on adults 91 79%
- Among adults: middle-aged and older adults (50 years and above) 40 44%
Controlled covariates
-Individual level
- Age 109 95%
- Gender 81 71%
- Education level 71 62%
- Marital status 34 30%
- Race/Ethnicity 31 27%
- Regional level (Neighborhood, school, county) 11 10%
- Health-related covariates 49 43%
- Socioeconomic status covariates 28 24%

Table 3 summarizes the key attributes of the selected studies, including the distribution of social capital domains covered and the main research findings (positive, negative, and mixed). Among the 115 studies, the components measured across the studies varied significantly in frequency. The most commonly assessed components were social participation (34%), social networks (30%), and social cohesion (30%), which appeared in nearly one-third of the studies. In contrast, less frequently assessed components included collective efficacy (4%), norms for physical activity (3%), and voting (1%), highlighting their limited inclusion in the reviewed literature.

Summary of social capital indicators included in the results of the social capital and physical health study (n = 115).

Social capital indicator Frequency (%) Result
Positive Mixed Null/negative
Social cohesion 34 (30%) 22 6 6
Trust 33 (29%) 16 5 12
Participation 39 (34%) 23 9 7
Reciprocity 15(13%) 7 4 4
Satisfied with environment 9 (8%) 5 1 3
Voting 1 (1%) 1
Collective Efficacy 5 (4%) 1 4
Safety 22 (19%) 1 5 16
Control 11 (10%) 4 1 6
Norms for PA 3 (3%) 1 2
Overall social network 30 (26%) 25 2 3
Social support 22 (19%) 7 6 9
Social networks 35 (30%) 5 26 4

Percentages may add to over 100% as many studies had measures from multiple social capital domains.

The studies varied in their use of social capital measures, including constructs (latent variables composed of indicators) and individual indicators (single items). 10% of the studies used a single measure of social capital (composed of one or more indicators), while 39% used a single social capital indicator only. 51% of the studies used multiple measures and indicators. The median number of indicators per study was 2, with a range of 1 to 6.

The most frequently examined measure of physical activity (PA) was subjective (86%), with 12 studies using objective PA measures. Four studies employed mixed measures. The types of PA included overall physical activity (79%), followed by leisure-time physical activity (17%), and 5 (4%) studies measured other types such as recreational, mixed, and school-based activities.

 3.3 Overall findings of the 115 studies on social capital and physical activity

Among the 115 included studies, the majority of positive results in the hypothesized direction for the association between social capital and physical activity were found in the following indicators: social cohesion, trust, participation, reciprocity, satisfaction with environment, and overall social network (see Table 3). The indicators of voting, collective efficacy, safety, control, and norms for PA predominantly showed null/negative results. The results for social support were similarly distributed among positive, negative, and mixed outcomes, while social networks predominantly showed mixed results. It is worth noting that the included studies examined various aspects of social networks related to physical activity. Some studies focused on specific dimensions, such as family or peer networks, or particular aspects like network size, diversity, and tie strength; these were categorized as social networks. Other studies analyzed the overall characteristics of entire social network, which we classified as overall social network. This classification helps to clarify the variability in the study results, as studies focusing on specific network dimensions may capture more targeted social influences, while studies examining overall network reflect broader structural patterns.

 3.4 Social cohesion and physical activity

A total of 34 studies examined the relationship between social cohesion and physical activity (38, 43–75). Overall, the studies found a direct positive correlation between social cohesion and physical activity. Specifically, 22 (64.7%) studies showed positive results, 6 (17.6%) studies showed mixed results, and 6 (17.6%) studies showed null or negative results.

The insignificant results were observed in specific subgroups: women/mothers (45, 49, 61), adolescents/high school students (55, 71), residents of high socioeconomic status/developed countries (53, 58, 66), middle-aged and older Chinese people (56, 70), and samples from low-income and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations (46, 60).

 3.5 Social trust and physical activity

A total of 33 studies examined the relationship between social trust and physical activity (15, 35–37, 45, 49, 50, 53, 57, 61, 63, 67, 71, 75–93). Overall, the studies found a direct positive correlation between social trust and physical activity. Specifically, 16 (48.5%) studies showed positive results, 5 (15.2%) studies showed mixed results, and 12 (36.3%) studies showed null or negative results.

The insignificant results were observed in specific subgroups: adults in developed countries (53, 77, 78, 81, 83, 88), middle-aged people in developing countries (84), women/mothers/pregnant women (49, 61, 93), children/high school students (35, 71, 82, 85, 89, 90), and disadvantaged communities (57).

 3.6 Social participation and physical activity

A total of 39 studies examined the relationship between social participation and physical activity (14, 37, 45, 46, 56, 63, 68, 71, 75–77, 79, 83, 84, 86–88, 91, 92, 94–113). Overall, studies found a direct positive correlation between social participation and physical activity. Specifically, 23 (59.0%) studies showed positive results, 9 (23.1%) studies showed mixed results, and 7 (17.9%) studies showed null or negative results.

The insignificant results were observed in specific subgroups: middle-aged and older adults (56, 104–107, 109, 111), adolescents (98, 101), adults in developed countries (77, 79), studies that could not predict longitudinal results (110), and some special samples such as social group members (68, 102), cancer survivors (99), and low-income adults living in public housing (46).

 3.7 Social norms and physical activity

A total of 15 studies examined the relationship between norms of reciprocity and physical activity (15, 35, 46, 57, 67, 78, 80, 82–85, 91, 92, 114, 115). Overall, studies found a direct positive correlation between norms of reciprocity and physical activity. Specifically, 7 (46.6%) studies showed positive results, 4 (26.7%) studies showed mixed results, and 4 (26.7%) studies showed null or negative results.

The insignificant results were observed in specific subgroups: adults in developed countries (78, 83), minors (35, 82, 85), women (45), working-class populations (80), and disadvantaged community adults (57).

Three studies examined the relationship between norms for PA and physical activity (46, 68, 80). Among these, only one study targeting African American church members (68) reported positive results. The other two studies did not find significant results and involved low-income adults living in public housing (46) and working-class populations (80).

 3.8 Satisfaction with environment and physical activity

A total of 9 studies examined the relationship between community satisfaction with the environment and physical activity (47, 50, 52, 56, 58, 74, 86, 96, 115). Overall, studies found a direct positive correlation between satisfaction with the environment and physical activity. Specifically, 5 (62.5%) studies showed positive results, 1 (11.1%) study showed mixed results, and 3 (37.5%) studies showed null or negative results.

The insignificant results were observed in specific subgroups: adolescents (47), older adults in China (56), and adults in developing countries (58). Adults in developed countries provided mixed results (52).

 3.9 Social network and physical activity

A total of 30 studies examined the relationship between overall social network and physical activity (14, 15, 38, 45, 46, 53, 57, 60, 67, 77, 80, 83, 86, 87, 91, 92, 94, 97, 98, 106, 108, 116–124). Overall, studies found a direct positive correlation between overall social network and physical activity. Specifically, 25 (83.3%) studies showed positive results, 2 (6.7%) studies showed mixed results, and 3 (10%) studies showed null or negative results.

The insignificant results were observed in specific subgroups: women in developed countries (45), working-class populations (80), and male populations in developing countries (15). Mixed results were observed during the COVID-19 pandemic among older female populations and adults in developed countries (77, 123).

A total of 35 studies examined the relationship between social networks and physical activity (32, 34, 66, 81, 84, 88, 99, 102, 104, 105, 107, 112, 113, 125–145). Overall, the studies found that the relationship between social networks and physical activity was mixed. Specifically, 5 (14.3%) studies showed positive results, 26 (74.3%) studies showed mixed results, and 4 (11.4%) studies showed null or negative results.

The studies that showed only null or negative results were found in specific subgroups: cancer survivors (99), older college students with small sample sizes (135), Latino civic groups (102), and members of the same sociocultural organization (107).

 3.10 Other indicators and physical activity

In studies examining the relationship between voting, collective efficacy, safety, and physical activity, the overall relationship was found to be null or negative. Specifically, only one study included voting and provided null/negative results (77). In studies examining collective efficacy (64, 89, 90, 146, 147), only one study reported positive results, which involved an intervention aimed at enhancing collective efficacy among mothers (146).

Regarding studies on safety (37, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 52, 58, 62, 73, 78, 80, 84, 85, 93, 105–107, 114, 127, 148, 149), 1 study (4.5%) showed positive results, 5 studies (22.8%) showed mixed results, and 16 studies (72.7%) showed null or negative results.

In studies examining the relationship between social control, social support, and physical activity, the overall relationship was found to be mixed. Regarding studies on social control (14, 35, 37, 60, 61, 71, 73, 89, 90, 108, 146), 4 (36.4%) studies showed positive results, 1 (9.1%) study showed mixed results, and 6 (54.5%) studies showed null or negative results. The insignificant results were observed in women (61), adolescents and children (35, 71, 73, 89, 90,), and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations (60).

In studies on social support (14, 32, 35, 46, 60, 61, 68, 71, 80, 82, 83, 86, 90, 93, 94, 97, 101, 108, 113, 127, 136, 138), 7 (31.8%) studies showed positive results, 6 (27.3%) studies showed mixed results, and 9 (40.9%) studies showed null or negative results.

 4 Discussion 4.1 Summary of key findings

This study found that social capital plays an important role in promoting physical activity. Our analysis indicates that multiple dimensions of social capital, including social cohesion, social trust, social participation, norms of reciprocity, satisfaction with environment, and overall social network, are significantly associated with physical activity. However, dimensions such as voting, collective efficacy, safety, and norms for physical activity did not show a significant association with physical activity. Additionally, the relationships between social networks, social control, and social support with physical activity yielded mixed results. Due to the varying relationships between different dimensions of social capital and individual characteristics, most studies reported both positive and negative outcomes.

 4.2 Positive outcomes

Social cohesion refers to the bonds and sense of solidarity among community members and is a crucial dimension of social capital (150, 151). Strong cohesion within a community can provide emotional support and increase opportunities for physical activity through community events and programs (152, 153). In this study, we found that social cohesion is positively associated with physical activity. This finding aligns with the existing literature and further underscores the critical role of social cohesion in promoting healthy behaviors (30, 154).

Trust is one of the core elements of social capital (155). High levels of trust within a community can enhance residents' sense of safety, indirectly promoting social support and cooperative social interactions, making individuals more willing to engage in outdoor activities and exercise (156–158). Overall, trust is positively associated with physical activity.

Social participation involves individuals' engagement in community activities and social organizations (159). Active participation in community activities not only increases opportunities for physical activity but also helps build more social connections, providing emotional support and social encouragement, thereby enhancing individuals' mental health (160–162). Overall, social participation is significantly associated with physical activity.

Norms of reciprocity refer to the mutual assistance and supportive behaviors among community members (163). In a community with strong norms of reciprocity, residents are more likely to help and encourage each other. This mutual support can provide both emotional support and practical assistance for physical activity (164, 165). Overall, there is a positive association between norms of reciprocity and physical activity.

Satisfaction with the environment refers to residents' overall attitude toward their community environment (166). Studies have shown that a good community environment, including factors like community density, green spaces, sports facilities, and street connectivity, can significantly enhance residents' levels of physical activity (167–169). Our results indicate that satisfaction with the environment is closely related to physical activity levels, with residents of highly satisfying communities being more likely to engage in outdoor activities and exercise.

Overall social network refers to the total sum of an individual's social relationships and connections, which can provide information, support, and motivation (170). In this study, we found that overall social network is significantly positively associated with physical activity. This finding aligns with the existing literature (171–173) and further emphasizes the critical role of overall social networks in promoting healthy behaviors (174, 175).

Although these social capital indicators generally have a positive impact on physical activity, their effects may vary depending on demographic characteristics and social context. For example, women showed insignificant results in indicators such as social cohesion, social trust, norms of reciprocity, and overall social networks. This could be because women, in many cultural contexts, bear more family and caregiving responsibilities, which limit their time and energy (176, 177). Social networks for women often focus more on family and close relationships, which may not directly promote physical activity (130, 178). Additionally, women might rely more on internal family support and trust rather than community-level trust to determine their physical activity behaviors (179).

Minors showed insignificant results in the social capital indicators of social cohesion, social trust, social participation, norms of reciprocity, and satisfaction with the environment. This may be because their physical activity is more influenced by school and family environments rather than the broader community (208). Additionally, some studies on social capital indicators for minors rely on parents' perceptions of family social capital (82, 85), which could affect the results. Parents' perceptions may not fully reflect the actual experiences and interactions of minors, leading to discrepancies in the findings.

Among adults, some insignificant results were observed in the social capital indicators of social cohesion, social trust, social participation, norms of reciprocity, satisfaction with the environment, and overall social networks, particularly among middle-aged and older adults, as well as adults in developed countries. This may be because the influence of social capital is confounded by other variables and external factors, indicating that its impact is not solely dependent on social capital itself (36, 180, 181).

Additionally, certain special populations, such as low-income and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, specific social groups, and cancer survivors, as well as unpredictable longitudinal results, may reflect the protective potential of social capital. However, the unique challenges faced by these groups might limit its effects (182–184).

The type of social capital indicator can also create differences. For example, the frequency, type, and duration of social participation can influence its relationship with physical activity (102, 105, 106, 111). Moreover, the negative effects of social capital should not be overlooked, such as workplace social capital and social participation among students, which have shown negative associations with physical activity (80, 98).

 4.3 Negative outcomes

Voting behavior is often considered a form of social participation (185). However, in this study, we found no significant association between studies involving voting behavior and physical activity. This may be because voting behavior itself does not directly involve physical activity, nor does it directly provide social support or enhance community interaction. Voting behavior mainly reflects citizens' willingness to participate politically rather than their daily health behaviors or physical activity levels (186). This could also be one of the reasons why there are fewer studies investigating the relationship between voting behavior and physical activity.

Collective efficacy refers to the ability of community members to work together to solve problems and achieve common goals (187). In this study, the association between collective efficacy and physical activity was not significant. This may be because collective efficacy more accurately reflects a community's ability to address social issues and provide public services rather than directly involving individual health behaviors (188, 189). Although communities with high collective efficacy may have better public resources and a safer environment (190, 191), this does not necessarily translate into individual physical activity behaviors.

Safety is often considered an important factor influencing physical activity (192, 193), but our study found no significant association between safety and physical activity. This is consistent with previous review findings (194). The lack of significant results may be due to varying measurement standards among the included studies, as broad crime indicators and PA measures might limit our ability to interpret the results. Additionally, while a safe community environment can provide the basic assurance for physical activity, merely feeling safe may not be sufficient to motivate individuals to increase their physical activity. Crime itself might not affect a person's PA behavior unless they feel threatened by crime or fear it (193).

Norms for physical activity refer to the community's expectations and promotion of physical activity (195). However, our study found no significant association between norms for physical activity and actual physical activity. This may be due to the limited number of studies involved, which focused on specific groups such as low-income adults (46) and working-class populations (80). Individuals' physical activity behavior may be more influenced by personal motivation, time management, and lifestyle (196, 197), rather than solely by community norms. Even if there are positive norms for physical activity within a community, the impact of these norms on individual behavior may be limited without the necessary facilities and support (198).

 4.4 Mixed outcomes

Social networks refer to individuals' social relationships and connections, including family, friends, colleagues, and neighborhood ties. These networks can be measured by various characteristics, such as size, density, relationship quality, and composition (199). Our findings show that the relationship between social networks and physical activity is mixed. This is consistent with previous studies (200–202). The mixed results highlight that strong social networks can promote physical activity through multiple pathways (170). However, the effects of social networks may vary across different populations and social contexts, potentially leading to ineffectiveness in certain groups, such as cancer survivors (99), older college students with small sample sizes (135), Latino civic groups (102), and members of the same sociocultural organization (107).

Social control refers to the ability of community members to influence and regulate individual behaviors through formal or informal means (203). In the included studies, social control provided mixed results. However, insignificant results were observed in specific groups such as women (61), adolescents and children (35, 71, 73, 89, 90), and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations (60). This may stem from the dual nature of social control's impact on individual behavior, encompassing both positive and negative influences (204, 205). Its effects vary depending on the implementation method and community context.

Social support refers to the emotional, informational, and practical assistance individuals receive from others, and it is considered an important factor in promoting physical activity (206). Our results show mixed findings regarding the relationship between social support and physical activity. This is likely due to the limitations of our search strategy and inclusion criteria. Numerous existing reviews have already established the relationship between social support and physical activity (39–41).

 4.5 Limitations and future directions

This study has several limitations. First, we only included literature published in English, which may have led to the exclusion of important studies in other languages. Second, most of the included studies used a cross-sectional design. While this design can reveal associations between variables, it cannot establish causality. Third, as a multidimensional concept, social capital has been measured using different methods and indicators across studies. This inconsistency can lead to heterogeneous results and limit the comparability of findings across studies. This is a common issue in social capital and health research, where the lack of consensus on the definition and measurement of social capital restricts researchers' ability to aggregate and quantitatively analyze results (30, 207). In our study, we combined unified social capital indicators with specific social capital indicators, which may have increased heterogeneity and potential confounding effects, thus limiting the robustness of our findings. Fourth, we adopted broad inclusion criteria for physical activity measures, and the studies primarily relied on subjective assessments of physical activity levels, which could result in reporting bias and measurement errors. Fifth, although the sample populations in the included studies are increasingly diverse, they are predominantly from developed countries, which limits the generalizability of the results and their applicability to different cultural contexts.

Based on the limitations discussed in this paper, future research should focus on: (1) adopting more longitudinal designs to better understand the long-term effects and causal mechanisms of social capital on physical activity; (2) striving for standardization and consistency in social capital measurement methods to improve the comparability of results and the ability to conduct comprehensive analyses; (3) using objective assessment tools to reduce potential biases and improve accuracy; (4) expanding the sample range to include more studies from developing countries and diverse cultural backgrounds to provide a more comprehensive understanding; (5) increasing focus on specific populations (such as minors, older adults, and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups) is needed, as there are fewer studies on these groups and the results are inconsistent. Future research should explore the role and impact of social capital in these populations in greater depth; (6) exploring the negative effects of social capital, as some studies have highlighted its potential adverse impacts. Future research should investigate these negative effects to fully understand their influence on physical activity and health; (7) developing and evaluating interventions aimed at promoting physical activity by enhancing social capital, and testing the underlying mechanisms and mediating effects, as most studies assume specific pathways but rarely test potential mechanisms.

 5 Conclusion

This study systematically reviewed the literature on the relationship between social capital and physical activity up to 2024, revealing the significant role of social capital in promoting physical activity. Our review of studies meeting our inclusion criteria found substantial evidence of associations between multiple dimensions of social capital—such as social cohesion, social trust, social participation, norms of reciprocity, satisfaction with environment, and overall social network—and physical activity. Few studies found significant associations between physical activity and the dimensions of voting, collective efficacy, safety, and norms for physical activity. In contrast, the dimensions of social networks, social control, and social support showed more support for an association with physical activity, but the results were mixed. Most studies yielded both positive and null results. These findings highlight the protective role of social capital in physical activity, indicating a strong influence of individual characteristics and cultural backgrounds. In the future, public health interventions should be tailored to different populations and contexts to better leverage social capital in promoting physical activity.

 Author contributions

ZG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RO: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JG: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RL: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FL: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TW: Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

 Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

 Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

 Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1467571/full#supplementary-material

 References Memon AR To QG Vandelanotte C. Vigorously cited: a bibliometric analysis of the 500 most cited physical activity articles. J Phys Activity Health. (2021) 18:904–19. 10.1123/jpah.2020-074434140424 Varela AR Cruz GIN Hallal P Blumenberg C da Silva SG Salvo D . Global, regional, and national trends and patterns in physical activity research since 1950: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ. (2021) 18:5. 10.1186/s12966-021-01100-333685444 Sabe M Chen C Sentissi O Deenik J Vancampfort D Firth J . Thirty years of research on physical activity, mental health, and wellbeing: a scientometric analysis of hotspots and trends. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:943435. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.94343536016904 Ai X Yang J Lin Z Wan X. Mental health and the role of physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:759987. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.75998734744938 Liu Y Zhang H Xu R. The impact of technology on promoting physical activities and mental health: a gender-based study. BMC Psychol. (2023) 11:298. 10.1186/s40359-023-01348-337775753 Mahindru A Patil P Agrawal V. Role of physical activity on mental health and well-being: a review. Cureus. (2023) 15:e33475. 10.7759/cureus.3347536756008 Warburton DER Nicol CW Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. (2006) 174:801–809. 10.1503/cmaj.05135116534088 Anderson E Durstine JL. Physical activity, exercise, and chronic diseases: a brief review. Sports Med Health Sci. (2019) 1:3–10. 10.1016/j.smhs.2019.08.00635782456 Misiag W Piszczyk A Szymańska-Chabowska A Chabowski M. Physical activity and cancer care—a review. Cancers. (2022) 14:4154. 10.3390/cancers1417415436077690 John JM Haug V Thiel A. Physical activity behavior from a transdisciplinary biopsychosocial perspective: a scoping review. Sports Med Open. (2020) 6:49. 10.1186/s40798-020-00279-233068179 Noh W Kim KY. Review of ecological approach factors affecting physical activity among older people. West J Nurs Res. (2022) 44:799–808. 10.1177/0193945921101753034032167 Wang Y Steenbergen B van der Krabben E Kooij HJ Raaphorst K Hoekman R. The impact of the built environment and social environment on physical activity: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2023) 20:6189. 10.3390/ijerph2012618937372774 McNeill LH Kreuter MW Subramanian SV. Social environment and physical activity: a review of concepts and evidence. Soc Sci Med. (2006) 63:1011–22. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.01216650513 Chen W Zhang C Cui Z Wang J Zhao J Wang J . The impact of social capital on physical activity and nutrition in China: the mediating effect of health literacy. BMC Public Health. (2019) 19:1713. 10.1186/s12889-019-8037-x31856789 Aliyas Z. Social capital and physical activity level in an urban adult population. Am J Health Educ. (2020) 51:40–9. 10.1080/19325037.2019.1691092 Villalonga-Olives E Wind TR Kawachi I. Social capital interventions in public health: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. (2018) 212:203–18. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.02230048843 Ehsan A Klaas HS Bastianen A Spini D. Social capital and health: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Population Health. (2019) 8:100425. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.10042531431915 Carradore M. Academic research output on social capital: a bibliometric and visualization analysis. Int J Sociol Soc Policy. (2022) 42:113–34. 10.1108/IJSSP-11-2022-028139430447 Bhandari H Yasunobu K. What is social capital? A comprehensive review of the concept. Asian J Soc Sci. (2009) 37:480–510. 10.1163/156853109X436847 Murayama H Fujiwara Y Kawachi I. Social capital and health: a review of prospective multilevel studies. J Epidemiol. (2012) 22:179–87. 10.2188/jea.JE2011012822447212 Villalonga-Olives E Kawachi I. The measurement of social capital. Gaceta Sanitaria. (2015) 29:62–4. 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.09.00625444390 Kawachi I Subramanian SV Kim D. Social capital and health. in Social Capital and Health, New York, NY: Springer (2008). p. 1–26. 10.1007/978-0-387-71311-3_1 Harpham T Grant E Thomas E. Measuring social capital within health surveys: key issues. Health Policy Plan. (2002) 17:106–11. 10.1093/heapol/17.1.10611861592 Islam MK Merlo J Kawachi I Lindström M Gerdtham U. Social capital and health: does egalitarianism matter? A literature review. Int J Equity Health. (2006) 5:3. 10.1186/1475-9276-5-316597324 Szreter S Woolcock M. Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. Int J Epidemiol. (2004) 33:650–67. 10.1093/ije/dyh01315282219 Poortinga W. Community resilience and health: the role of bonding, bridging, and linking aspects of social capital. Health Place. (2012) 18:286–95. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.01722037322 Coll-Planas L Nyqvist F Puig T Urrútia G Solà I Monteserín R. Social capital interventions targeting older people and their impact on health: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Commun Health. (2017) 71:663–672. 10.1136/jech-2016-20813127834223 Xue X Reed WR Menclova A. Social capital and health: a meta-analysis. J Health Econ. (2020) 72:102317. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.10231732497954 Villalonga-Olives E Kawachi I. The dark side of social capital: a systematic review of the negative health effects of social capital. Soc Sci Med. (2017) 194:105–27. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.02029100136 Rodgers J Valuev AV Hswen Y Subramanian SV. Social Capital and Physical Health: An Updated Review of the Literature for 2007–2018′. Soc Sci Med. (2019) 236:112360. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.11236031352315 Wiltshire G Stevinson C. Exploring the role of social capital in community-based physical activity: qualitative insights from parkrun. Qualit Res Sport, Exer Health. (2018) 10:47–62. 10.1080/2159676X.2017.1376347 Flórez KR Richardson AS Ghosh-Dastidar M Troxel W DeSantis A Colabianchi N . The power of social networks and social support in promotion of physical activity and body mass index among African American adults. SSM - Populat Health. (2018) 4:327. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.03.00429854917 Luo M Ding D Bauman A Negin J Phongsavan P. Social engagement pattern, health behaviors and subjective well-being of older adults: an international perspective using WHO-SAGE survey data. BMC Public Health. (2020) 20:99. 10.1186/s12889-019-7841-731973695 Du T Li Y. Effects of social networks in promoting young adults' physical activity among different sociodemographic groups. Behav Sci. (2022) 12:345. 10.3390/bs1209034536135149 Novak D Doubova SV Kawachi I. Social capital and physical activity among croatian high school students. Public Health. (2016) 135:48–55. 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.02.00227112377 Lindström M. Social capital, desire to increase physical activity and leisure-time physical activity: a population-based study. Public Health. (2011) 125:442–7. 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.01.01521771550 Kim JR Jeong B Park KS Kang YS. Association of social capital at the individual level with physical activity in communities with high mortality in Korea. Health Promot Int. (2017) 32:850–9. 10.1093/heapro/daw01727020574 Fu C Wang C Yang F Cui D Wang Q Mao Z. Association between social capital and physical activity among community-dwelling elderly in Wuhan, China. Int J Gerontol. (2018) 12:155–9. 10.1016/j.ijge.2017.10.00135931049 Mendonça G Cheng LA Mélo EN de Farias Júnior JC. Physical activity and social support in adolescents: a systematic review. Health Educ Res. (2014) 29:822–39. 10.1093/her/cyu01724812148 Lindsay Smith G Banting L Eime R O'Sullivan G van Uffelen JGZ. The association between social support and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. (2017) 14:56. 10.1186/s12966-017-0509-828449673 Scarapicchia TMF Amireault S Faulkner G Sabiston CM. Social support and physical activity participation among healthy adults: a systematic review of prospective studies. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. (2017) 10:50–83. 10.1080/1750984X.2016.1183222 Page MJ McKenzie JE Bossuyt PM Boutron I Hoffmann TC Mulrow CD . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. (2021) 88:105906. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.10590633789826 Fisher KJ Li F Michael Y Cleveland M. Neighborhood-level influences on physical activity among older adults: a multilevel analysis. J Aging Phys Act. (2004) 12:45–63. 10.1123/japa.12.1.4515211020 Cradock AL Kawachi I Colditz GA Gortmaker SL Buka SL. Neighborhood social cohesion and youth participation in physical activity in Chicago. Soc Sci Med. (2009) 68:427–35. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.02819036490 Ball K Cleland VJ Timperio AF Salmon J Giles-Corti B Crawford DA. Love thy neighbour? Associations of social capital and crime with physical activity amongst women. Soc Sci Med. (2010) 71:807–14. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.04120561727 Shelton RC McNeill LH Puleo E Wolin KY Emmons KM Bennett GG. The association between social factors and physical activity among low-income adults living in public housing. Am J Public Health. (2011) 101:2102–10. 10.2105/AJPH.2010.19603021330588 Utter J Denny S Robinson E Ameratunga S Milfont TL. Social and physical contexts of schools and neighborhoods: associations with physical activity among young people in New Zealand. Am J Public Health. (2011) 101:1690–5. 10.2105/AJPH.TEST.2011.300171 Kaczynski AT Glover TD. Talking the talk, walking the walk: examining the effect of neighbourhood walkability and social connectedness on physical activity. J Public Health. (2012) 34:382–9. 10.1093/pubmed/fds01122378942 Strong LL Reitzel LR Wetter DW McNeill LH. Associations of perceived neighborhood physical and social environments with physical activity and television viewing in African-American men and women. Am J Health Promot. (2013) 27:401–9. 10.4278/ajhp.120306-QUAN-12723398134 Button B Trites S Janssen I. Relations between the school physical environment and school social capital with student physical activity levels. BMC Public Health. (2013) 13:1191. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-119124341628 Pabayo R Molnar BE Cradock A Ichiro K. The relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics and physical inactivity among adolescents living in Boston, Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. (2014) 104:e142–9. 10.2105/AJPH.2014.30210925211727 Jongeneel-Grimen B Droomers MHAM van Oers Stronks K Kunst AE. The relationship between physical activity and the living environment: a multi-level analyses focusing on changes over time in environmental factors. Health Place. (2014) 26:149–160. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.12.00324448404 Moore S Stewart S Teixeira A. Decomposing social capital inequalities in health. J Epidemiol Commun Health. (2014) 68:233–8. 10.1136/jech-2013-20299624258198 Prins RG Beenackers MA Boog MC Van Lenthe FJ Brug J Oenerna A. Neighbourhood social capital as a moderator between individual cognitions and sports behaviour among dutch adolescents. Soc Sci Med. (2014) 105:9–15. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.03124606792 Pabayo R Janosz M Bisset S Kawachi I. School social fragmentation, economic deprivation and social cohesion and adolescent physical inactivity: a longitudinal study. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e99154. 10.1371/journal.pone.009915424932679 Gao J Fu H Li J Jia Y. Association between social and built environments and leisure-time physical activity among chinese older adults - a multilevel analysis energy balance-related behaviours. BMC Public Health. (2015) 15:3. 10.1186/s12889-015-2684-326715531 Marlier M Van Dyck D Cardon G De Bourdeaudhuij I Babiak K Willem A. Interrelation of sport participation, physical activity, social capital and mental health in disadvantaged communities: a SEM-analysis. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0140196. 10.1371/journal.pone.014019626451731 Andrade ACS Peixoto SV Friche AAL Goston JL César CC Xavier CC . Social context of neighborhood and socioeconomic status on leisure-time physical activity in a brazilian urban center: the BH health study. Cad Saude Publica. (2015) 31:S136–47. 10.1590/0102-311X0006951426648369 Yi SS Trinh-Shevrin C Yen IH Kwon SC. Racial/ethnic differences in associations between neighborhood social cohesion and meeting physical activity guidelines, United States, 2013-2014′. Prevent Chron Dis. (2016) 13:160261. 10.5888/pcd13.16026127930284 Kamimura A Tabler J Nourian MM Assasnik N Wright L Ashby J. Prevention and management of hypertension and diabetes using social capital and physical activity among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Family Commun Health. (2017) 40:205–11. 10.1097/FCH.000000000000015628525440 Dlugonski D Das BM Martin TR Palmer A. Collective efficacy, physical activity, and health outcomes among mothers. Family Commun Health. (2017) 40:316–23. 10.1097/FCH.000000000000016228820785 Yuma-Guerrero P Cubbin JC von Sternberg K. Neighborhood social cohesion as a mediator of neighborhood conditions on mothers' engagement in physical activity: results from the geographic research on wellbeing study. Health Educ Behav. (2017) 44:845–856. 10.1177/109019811668753728142286 Bartshe M Coughenour C Pharr J. Perceived walkability, social capital, and self-reported physical activity in las vegas college students. Sustainability. (2018) 10:3023. 10.3390/su10093023 Rodrigues DE César CC Kawachi I Xavier CC Caiaffa WT Proietti FA. The influence of neighborhood social capital on leisure-time physical activity: a population-based study in Brazil. J Urban Health-Bull New York Acad Med. (2018) 95:727–38. 10.1007/s11524-018-0293-z30062644 Vancampfort D Stubbs B Veronese N Mugisha J Swinnen N Koyanagi A. Correlates of physical activity among depressed older people in six low-income and middle-income countries: a community-based cross-sectional study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2018) 33:e314–22. 10.1002/gps.479628994143 Yamamoto M Jo H. Perceived neighborhood walkability and physical exercise: an examination of casual communication in a social process. Health Place. (2018) 51:28–35. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.02.00629518715 Quinn TD Wu F Mody D Bushover B Mendez DD Schiff M . Associations between neighborhood social cohesion and physical activity in the united states, national health interview survey, 2017′. Prevent Chronic Dis. (2019) 16. 10.5888/pcd16.19008531858956 Heredia N Nguyen N McNeill LH. The importance of the social environment in achieving high levels of physical activity and fruit and vegetable intake in African American church members. Am J Health Promot. (2020) 34:886–93. 10.1177/089011712092536132410458 Kim J Kim J Han A. Leisure time physical activity mediates the relationship between neighborhood social cohesion and mental health among older adults. J Appl Gerontol. (2020) 39:292–300. 10.1177/073346481985919931271089 Feng Z Cramm JM Nieboer AP. Associations of social cohesion and socioeconomic status with health behaviours among middle-aged and older Chinese people. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:4894. 10.3390/ijerph1809489434064460 Mieziene B Emeljanovas A Tilindiene I Tumynaite L Trinkuniene L Kawachi I. The direct and indirect relationships of environmental, interpersonal and personal factors with high school students physical activity: an ecological approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:1–16. 10.3390/ijerph1803087433498423 Wang ML Narcisse MR Alatorre S Kozak AT McElfish PA. Neighborhood social cohesion and physical activity and obesity outcomes among native hawaiian and pacific islander individuals. Obesity. (2022) 30:249–56. 10.1002/oby.2329834910366 Ganzar LA Salvo D Burford K Zhang Y Kohl HW Hoelscher DM. Longitudinal changes in objectively-measured physical activity and sedentary time among school-age children in central Texas, US during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2022) 19:11. 10.1186/s12966-022-01299-935590329 Cheng GJ Nicklett EJ. Racial and ethnic differences in the relationship between neighborhood environment and physical activity among middle-aged and older adults. J Aging Health. (2022) 34:1163–77. 10.1177/0898264322110335935603774 Bartshe M Coughenour C Stephen H. The relationship between tree canopy and social capital on physical activity in college students. J Am College Health. (2023) 71:1705–14. 10.1080/07448481.2021.194729934314667 Greiner KA Li C Kawachi I Hunt DC Ahluwalia JS. The relationships of social participation and community ratings to health and health behaviors in areas with high and low population density. Soc Sci Med. (2004) 59:2303–12. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.02315450705 Kim D Subramanian SV Gortmaker SL Kawachi I. US state- and county-level social capital in relation to obesity and physical inactivity: a multilevel, multivariable analysis. Soc Sci Med. (2006) 63:1045–59. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.02.01716644081 Wen M Browning CR Cagney KA. Neighbourhood deprivation, social capital and regular exercise during adulthood: a multilevel study in Chicago. Urban Stud. (2007) 44:2651–71. 10.1080/00420980701558418 Ueshima K Fujiwara T Takao S Suzuki E Iwase T Doi H . Does social capital promote physical activity? A population-based study in Japan. PLoS ONE. (2010) 5:e12135. 10.1371/journal.pone.001213520808822 McNeill LH Stoddard A Bennett GG Wolin KY Sorensen GG. Influence of individual and social contextual factors on changes in leisure-time physical activity in working-class populations: results of the healthy directions-small businesses study. Cancer Causes Control. (2012) 23:1475–87. 10.1007/s10552-012-0021-z22806257 Legh-Jones H Moore S. Network social capital, social participation, and physical inactivity in an urban adult population. Soc Sci Med. (2012) 74:1362–7. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.00522410270 Davison KK Nishi A Kranz S Wyckoff L May JJ Earle-Richardson GB . Associations among social capital, parenting for active lifestyles, and youth physical activity in rural families living in upstate New York. Soc Sci Med. (2012) 75:1488–96. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.00222818486 Nieminen T Prättälä R Martelin T Härkänen T Hyyppä MT Alanen E . Social capital, health behaviours and health: a population-based associational Study. BMC Public Health. (2013) 13:614. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-61323805881 Loch MR Souza RK Mesas AE Martinez-Gómez D Rodríguez-Artalejo F. Relationship between social capital indicators and lifestyle in Brazilian adults. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. (2015) 31:1636–47. 10.1590/0102-311X0013261426375643 Muthuri SK Wachira LM Onywera VO Tremblay MS. Associations between parental perceptions of the neighborhood environment and childhood physical activity: results from ISCOLE-Kenya. J Phys Activity Health. (2016) 13:333–43. 10.1123/jpah.2014-059526285040 Fang J Wang JW Li J Li H Shao C. The correlates of social capital and adherence to healthy lifestyle in patients with coronary heart disease. Patient Prefer Adherence. (2017) 11:1701–7. 10.2147/PPA.S14078729033557 Xue X Cheng M. Social capital and health in china: exploring the mediating role of lifestyle. BMC Public Health. (2017) 17:6. 10.1186/s12889-017-4883-629110657 Josey MJ Moore S. The influence of social networks and the built environment on physical inactivity: a longitudinal study of urban-dwelling adults. Health Place. (2018) 54:62–8. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.08.01630245244 Yildizer G Bilgin E Korur EN Novak D Demirhan G. The association of various social capital indicators and physical activity participation among Turkish adolescents. J Sport Health Sci. (2018) 7:27–33. 10.1016/j.jshs.2017.10.00830356478 Yildizer G Yilmaz I Novak D. Social capital and physical activity participation among Turkish adolescents in urban centres: a preliminary study. South African J Res Sport Phys Educ Recreat. (2019) 41:117–29. Jun HJ Park S. The effect of cross-level interaction between community factors and social capital among individuals on physical activity: considering gender difference. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:495. 10.3390/ijerph1603049530754628 Liang H Yue Z Liu E Xiang N. How does social capital affect individual health among the elderly in rural China?— Mediating effect analysis of physical exercise and positive attitude. PLoS ONE. (2020) 15:18. 10.1371/journal.pone.023131832716935 Sugiyama S Momma H Yamada A Huang C Tatsuta N Sakurai K . Social capital and physical activity among japanese pregnant women: adjunct study of japan environment and children's study in Miyagi prefecture. Tohoku J Exper Med. (2023) 259:307–18. 10.1620/tjem.2023.J00436653161 Lindström M Hanson BS Östergren PO. Socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity: the role of social participation and social capital in shaping health related behaviour. Soc Sci Med. (2001) 52:441–451. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00153-211330778 Lindström M Moghaddassi M Merlo J. Social capital and leisure time physical activity: a population based multilevel analysis in Malmö, Sweden. J Epidemiol Commun Health. (2003) 57:23–8. 10.1136/jech.57.1.2312490644 Zlot AI Librett J Buchner D Schmid T. Environmental, transportation, social, and time barriers to physical activity. J Phys Activity Health. (2006) 3:15–21. 10.1123/jpah.3.1.15 Mummery WK Lauder W Schofield G Caperchione C. Associations between physical inactivity and a measure of social capital in a sample of Queensland adults. J Sci Med Sport. (2008) 11:308–15. 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.06.00217707692 Logstein B Blekesaune A Almås R. Physical activity among Norwegian adolescents a multilevel analysis of how place of residence is associated with health behaviour: the young-HUNT study. Int J Equity Health. (2013) 12:56. 10.1186/1475-9276-12-5623883144 Kim BH Wallington SF Makambi KH Adams-Campbell LL. Social networks and physical activity behaviors among cancer survivors: data from the 2005 health information national trends survey. J Health Commun. (2015) 20:656–62. 10.1080/10810730.2015.101857625978562 Johnson-Lawrence V Schulz AJ Zenk SN Israel BA Wineman J Marans RW . Joint associations of residential density and neighborhood involvement with physical activity among a multiethnic sample of urban adults. Health Educ Behav. (2015) 42:510–7. 10.1177/109019811456450025626432 Babey SH Wolstein J Diamant AL. Adolescent physical activity: role of school support, role models, and social participation in racial and income disparities. Environ Behav. (2016) 48:172–91. 10.1177/0013916515609086 Becky M Gonzalez P Gallo L Ji M. Latino civic group participation, social networks, physical activity. Am J Health Behav. (2016) 40:437–45. 10.5993/AJHB.40.4.527338990 Kikuchi H Inoue S Fukushima N Takamiya T Odagiri Y Ohya Y . Social participation among older adults not engaged in full- or part-time work is associated with more physical activity and less sedentary time. Geriatr Gerontol Int. (2017) 17:1921–7. 10.1111/ggi.1299528230301 Ho EC Hawkley L Dale W Waite L Huisingh-Scheetz M. Social capital predicts accelerometry-measured physical activity among older adults in the US: a cross-sectional study in the national social life, health, aging project. BMC Public Health. (2018) 18. 10.1186/s12889-018-5664-629945588 Davis CMA Sentell TL de Souza Barbosa JF Ylli A Curcio C Pirkle CM. Meeting physical activity guidelines by walking in older adults from three middle-income countries: a cross-sectional analysis from the international mobility in aging study. J Aging Phys Act. (2020) 28:333–42. 10.1123/japa.2018-046331715581 Ward M Gibney S O'Callaghan D Shannon S. Age-friendly environments, active lives? Associations between the local physical and social environment and physical activity among adults aged 55 and older in Ireland. J Aging Phys Act. (2020) 28:140–48. 10.1123/japa.2019-001231629358 Boen F Pelssers J Scheerder J Vanbeselaere N Vos S Hurkmans E . Does social capital benefit older adults' health and well-being? the mediating role of physical activity. J Aging Health. (2020) 32:688–97. 10.1177/089826431984863831092109 Zhao J Ma Y Tanimoto T Ozaki A Chen WL Wang JY . Effects of physical activity and stress on the relationship between social capital and quality of life among breast cancer survivors. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:5. 10.1038/s41598-020-74706-533082389 Sasaki S Sato A Tanabe Y Matsuoka S Adachi A Kayano T . Associations between socioeconomic status, social participation, and physical activity in older people during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in a northern Japanese city. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:1477. 10.3390/ijerph1804147733557257 Herbolsheimer F Ungar N Portegijs E Dallmeier D Schaap L Smith TB . Neighborhood environment, social participation, and physical activity in older adults with lower limb osteoarthritis: a mediation analysis. Health Place. (2021) 68:7. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.10251333508711 Nemoto Y Sato S Kitabatake Y Nakamura M Takeda N Maruo K . Longitudinal associations of social group engagement with physical activity among Japanese older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2021) 92:104092. 10.1016/j.archger.2020.10425933011428 Otaki N Yokoro M Yano M Imamura T Akita M Tanino N . Social contact impacts physical activity and sedentary behavior among older adults in japan due to COVID-19. BMC Geriatr. (2022) 22:491. 10.1186/s12877-022-03188-z35676622 Zimmer C McDonough MH. Social support and physical activity in older adults: identifying predictors using data from the Canadian longitudinal study on aging. J Aging Phys Act. (2022) 30:136–47. 10.1123/japa.2020-039334348225 Dwyer LA Patel M Nebeling LC Oh AY. Independent associations and interactions of perceived neighborhood and psychosocial constructs on adults' physical activity. J Phys Activity Health. (2018) 15:361–8. 10.1123/jpah.2017-020229569999 Wang RY Chen HS Liu Y Lu Y Yao Y. Neighborhood social reciprocity and mental health among older adults in china: the mediating effects of physical activity, social interaction, and volunteering. BMC Public Health. (2019) 19:1036. 10.1186/s12889-019-7385-x31375090 Unger JB Johnson CA. Social relationships and physical-activity in health club members. Am J Health Promot. (1995) 9:340–3. 10.4278/0890-1171-9.5.34010150765 Azar D Naughton GA Joseph CW. Physical activity and social connectedness in single-parent families. Leisure Stud. (2009) 28:349–58. 10.1080/0261436090304665622745923 Lightner J Irwin BC Chrisman M. Changes in social integration predict changes in physical activity: a 25-year prospective study. J Phys Activity Health. (2018) 15:531–6. 10.1123/jpah.2017-000929570429 Pérez LM Castellano-Tejedor C Cesari M Soto-Bagaria L Ars J Zambom-Ferraresi F . Depressive symptoms, fatigue and social relationships influenced physical activity in frail older community-dwellers during the spanish lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:808. 10.3390/ijerph1802080833477879 Yamashita R Sato S Akase R Doi T Tsuzuku S Yokoi T . Effects of social network incentives and financial incentives on physical activity and social capital among older women: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. (2021) 21:188. 10.1186/s12889-021-10175-333478465 Liu Y Lachman ME. A group-based walking study to enhance physical activity among older adults: the role of social engagement. Res Aging. (2021) 43:368–77. 10.1177/016402752096361333021146 Wieland ML Njeru JW Asiedu GB Zeratsky KA Clark MM Goetze R . Pilot social network weight loss intervention with two immigrant populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Health Promot. (2022) 36:458–71. 10.1177/0890117121105345035073499 Crandall CJ Larson J Cene CW Bellettiere J Laddu D Jackson RD . Relationship of social connectedness with decreasing physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic among older women participating in the women's health initiative study. J Gerontol. (2022) 77:S22–30. 10.1093/gerona/glac10835596268 Xie H Salinas-Mosombite D Spear SE. Residential mobility and adolescents' physical activity: the mediating role of neighborhood social ties. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. (2024) 34:221–33. 10.1080/10911359.2023.221970632160319 Voorhees CC Murray D Welk G Birnbaum A Ribisl KM Johnson CC . The role of peer social network factors and physical activity in adolescent girls. Am J Health Behav. (2005) 29:183–90. 10.5993/AJHB.29.2.915698985 Peláez S Lavoie KL Gordon JL Arsenault A Bacon SL. Social networks and exercise in coronary heart disease patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. (2010) 30:324–8. 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181d8dd1220410827 Yu G Renton A Schmidt E Tobi P Bertotti M Watts P . A multilevel analysis of the association between social networks and support on leisure time physical activity: evidence from 40 disadvantaged areas in London. Health Place. (2011) 17:1023–9. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.07.00221784693 Shiovitz-Ezra S Litwin H. Social network type and health-related behaviors: evidence from an american national survey. Soc Sci Med. (2012) 75:901–4. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.03122682660 Gesell SB Tesdahl E Ruchman E. The distribution of physical activity in an after-school friendship network. Pediatrics. (2012) 129:1064–71. 10.1542/peds.2011-256722641755 Larsen B Strong D Linke S. The association between family and friend integration and physical activity: results from the NHIS. Int J Behav Med. (2014) 21:529–36. 10.1007/s12529-013-9318-x23681602 Marquez B Elder JP Arredondo EM Madanat H Ji M Ayala GX. Social network characteristics associated with health promoting behaviors among latinos. Health Psychol. (2014) 33:544–53. 10.1037/hea000009224884908 Shin HS Valente TW Riggs NR Huh J Spruijt-Metz D Chou CP . The interaction of social networks and child obesity prevention program effects: the pathways trial. Obesity. (2014) 22:1520–6. 10.1002/oby.2073124616241 Kennedy-Hendricks A Schwartz H Thornton RJ Griffin BA Green HDJr Kennedy DP . Intergenerational social networks and health behaviors among children living in public housing. Am J Public Health. (2015) 105:2291–7. 10.2105/AJPH.2015.30266326378821 Calogiuri G. Natural environments and childhood experiences promoting physical activity, examining the mediational effects of feelings about nature and social networks. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2016) 13:439. 10.3390/ijerph1304043927110802 Harmon BE Forthofer M Bantum EO Nigg CR. Perceived influence and college students' diet and physical activity behaviors: an examination of ego-centric social networks. BMC Public Health. (2016) 16:473. 10.1186/s12889-016-3166-y27267371 Clarke CL Sniehotta FF Vadiveloo T Argo IS Donnan PT McMurdo MET . Factors associated with change in objectively measured physical activity in older people - data from the physical activity cohort scotland study. BMC Geriatr. (2017) 17:578. 10.1186/s12877-017-0578-128806930 Haynie DL Whichard C Kreager DA Schaefer DR Wakefield S. Social networks and health in a prison unit. J Health Soc Behav. (2018) 59:318–34. 10.1177/002214651879093530070603 Marquez B Norman G Fowler J Gans K Marcus B. Egocentric networks and physical activity outcomes in latinas. PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:e0199139. 10.1371/journal.pone.019913929912935 Seino S Kitamura A Nishi M Tomine Y Tanaka I Taniguchi Y . Individual- and community-level neighbor relationships and physical activity among older japanese adults living in a metropolitan area: a cross-sectional multilevel analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2018) 15:11. 10.1186/s12966-018-0679-z29801456 Fingerman KL Huo M Charles ST Umberson DJ. Variety is the spice of late life: social integration and daily activity. J Gerontol. (2020) 75:377–88. 10.1093/geronb/gbz00730783671 Thanawala MS Siddique J Schneider JA Kanaya AM Cooper AJ Dave SS . Association of social networks and physical activity in south asians: the mediators of atherosclerosis in south Asians living in America cohort study. J Phys Activity Health. (2020) 17:149–55. 10.1123/jpah.2019-009931810059 Montgomery SC Donnelly M Badham J Kee F Dunne L Hunter RF. A multi-method exploration into the social networks of young teenagers and their physical activity behavior. BMC Public Health. (2021) 21:77. 10.1186/s12889-020-10081-033413221 Cho SMJ Lee H Shim JS Youm Y Jung SJ Kim DJ . Association between social network structure and physical activity in middle-aged Korean adults. Soc Sci Med. (2021) 282. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.11411234153819 Wray B Grimes A Eighmy K Lightner J. The relationship between social integration and physical activity, diet, and sleep among youths: cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Pediatr Parent. (2022) 5:40354. 10.2196/4035436416871 Prochnow T Park JH Patterson MS. Intramural sports social networks and implications for college student physical activity, sense of community, and retention. J Am College Health. (2023) 2:1–7. 10.1080/07448481.2023.223936737531217 Dlugonski D Das BM Martin TR. Impact of a standard versus collective-efficacy enhanced intervention to increase physical activity among mothers. Psychol Health. (2020) 35:239–53. 10.1080/08870446.2019.162639731204499 Kronaizl SG Koss KJ. Perceived neighbourhood collective efficacy and adolescent health determinants: investigating outdoor play as a mediator. Child Care Health Dev. (2023) 49:933–40. 10.1111/cch.1310336794793 Ruijsbroek A Droomers M Groenewegen PP Hardyns W Stronks K. Social safety, self-rated general health and physical activity: changes in area crime, area safety feelings and the role of social cohesion. Health and Place. (2015) 31:39–45. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.10.00825463916 Akosile CO Ngwu NP Okonkwo UP Onwuakagba IU Okoye EC. Neighborhood safety, fall indices, physical activity level and social participation restrictions from a population of community-dwelling older adults in Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria. BMC Geriatr. (2023) 23:358. 10.1186/s12877-023-04059-x37291512 Manca AR. Social cohesion. In: Alex Michalos C., editor. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands (2014). p. 6026–28. 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2739 Miller HN Thornton CP Rodney T Thorpe RJ Allen J. Social cohesion in health. ANS. (2020) 43:375–90. 10.1097/ANS.000000000000032732956090 Cramm JM van Dijk HM Nieboer AP. The importance of neighborhood social cohesion and social capital for the well being of older adults in the community. Gerontologist. (2013) 53:142–52. 10.1093/geront/gns05222547088 Jennings V Bamkole O. The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: an avenue for health promotion. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:452. 10.3390/ijerph1603045230720732 Chuang Y Chuang K Yang T. Social cohesion matters in health. Int J Equity Health. (2013) 12:87. 10.1186/1475-9276-12-8724165541 Six B van Zimmeren E Popa F Frison C. Trust and social capital in the design and evolution of institutions for collective action. Int J Commons. (2015) 9:151–76. 10.18352/bmgn-lchr.435 Di Napoli I Dolce P Arcidiacono C. Community trust: a social indicator related to community engagement. Soc Indic Res. (2019) 145:551–79. 10.1007/s11205-019-02114-y38954978 Lansing AE Romero NJ Siantz E Silva V Center K Casteel D . Building trust: leadership reflections on community empowerment and engagement in a large urban initiative. BMC Public Health. (2023) 23:1252. 10.1186/s12889-023-15860-z37380973 Zwart R Hines R. Community wellness and social support as motivation for participation in outdoor adventure recreation. J Outdoor Recreat Educ Leader. (2022) 14:11139. 10.18666/JOREL-2022-V14-I1-1113919842780 Levasseur M Richard L Gauvin L Raymond E. Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: proposed taxonomy of social activities. Soc Sci Med. (2010) 71:2141–9. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.04121044812 Wanchai A Phrompayak D. Social participation types and benefits on health outcomes for elder people: a systematic review. Ageing Int. (2019) 44:9338. 10.1007/s12126-018-9338-627409075 Chen J Zeng Y Fang Y. Effects of social participation patterns and living arrangement on mental health of Chinese older adults: a latent class analysis. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:915541. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.91554135991050 Tcymbal A Abu-Omar K Hartung V Bußkamp A Comito C Rossmann C . Interventions simultaneously promoting social participation and physical activity in community living older adults: a systematic review. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:1048496. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.104849636568739 Gouldner AW. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am Sociol Rev. (1960) 25:161. 10.2307/2092623 Sánchez-Franco MJ Roldán J. The influence of familiarity, trust and norms of reciprocity on an experienced sense of community: an empirical analysis based on social online services. Behav Inf Technol. (2015) 34:92–412. 10.1080/0144929X.2014.959455 Ngai SS Cheung CK Mo J Chau SY Yu EN Wang L . Mediating effects of emotional support reception and provision on the relationship between group interaction and psychological well-being: a study of young patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:12110. 10.3390/ijerph18221211034831863 Adriaanse CCM. Measuring residential satisfaction: a residential environmental satisfaction scale (RESS). J Hous Built Environ. (2007) 22:287–304. 10.1007/s10901-007-9082-9 Sugiyama T Leslie E Giles-Corti B Owen N. Physical activity for recreation or exercise on neighbourhood streets: associations with perceived environmental attributes. Health Place. (2009) 15:1058–63. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.05.00119473867 Zhang Y van Dijk T Wagenaar C. How the built environment promotes residents' physical activity: the importance of a holistic people-centered perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:5595. 10.3390/ijerph1909559535564990 Zeng E Dong Y Yan L Lin A. Perceived safety in the neighborhood: exploring the role of built environment, social factors, physical activity and multiple pathways of influence. Buildings. (2023) 13:2. 10.3390/buildings13010002 Berkman LF Glass T Brissette I Seeman TE. From social integration to health: durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med. (2000) 51:843–57. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-410972429 Latkin CA Knowlton AR. Social network assessments and interventions for health behavior change: a critical review. Behav Med. (2015) 41:90–7. 10.1080/08964289.2015.103464526332926 van Woudenberg TJ Simoski B Fernandes de Mello Araújo E Bevelander KE Burk WJ Smit CR . Identifying influence agents that promote physical activity through the simulation of social network interventions: agent-based modeling study. J Med Internet Res. (2019) 21:e12914. 10.2196/1291431381504 Van Woudenberg TJ Bevelander KE Burk WJ Smit CR Buijs L Buijzen M. Testing a social network intervention using vlogs to promote physical activity among adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. Front Psychol. (2020) 10:2913. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.0291331998181 Pescosolido B Levy J. The role of social networks in health, illness, disease and healing: the accepting present, the forgotten past, and the dangerous potential for a complacent future. Adv Med Sociol. (2001) 8:3–25. 10.1016/S1057-6290(02)80019-5 Smith KP Christakis NA. Social networks and health. Annu Rev Sociol. (2008) 34:405–29. 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134601 Samtleben C Müller K. Care and careers: gender (in)equality in unpaid care, housework and employment. Res Soc Stratif Mobil. (2022) 77:100659. 10.1016/j.rssm.2021.100659 Miao X Han J Wang S Han B. Impacts of family care for children and the elderly on women's employment: evidence from rural China. Front Psychol. (2023) 14:1208749. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.120874937786482 Henderson K Ainsworth B. The connections between social support and women's physical activity involvement: the cultural activity participation study. Women Sport Phys Activ J. (2000) 9:27–53. 10.1123/wspaj.9.2.27 Segar M Taber JM Patrick H Thai CL Oh A. Rethinking physical activity communication: using focus groups to understand women's goals, values, and beliefs to improve public health. BMC Public Health. (2017) 17:462. 10.1186/s12889-017-4361-128521756 Eriksson U Arvidsson D Sundquist K. Availability of exercise facilities and physical activity in 2,037 adults: cross-sectional results from the swedish neighborhood and physical activity (SNAP) study. BMC Public Health. (2012) 12:607. 10.1186/1471-2458-12-60722863215 Lin L Liu Q Xiao X Luo Q. Perceived constraints on active recreational sport participation among residents in urban China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:14884. 10.3390/ijerph19221488436429601 Kaljee ML Chen X. Social capital and risk and protective behaviors: a global health perspective. Adolesc Health Med Ther. (2011) 2:113–22. 10.2147/AHMT.S2656023243387 Santini ZI Jose PE Koyanagi A Meilstrup C Nielsen L Madsen KR . Formal social participation protects physical health through enhanced mental health: a longitudinal mediation analysis using three consecutive waves of the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE). Soc Sci Med. (2020) 251:112906. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.11290632151885 Snel E Engbersen G de Boom J van Bochove M. (2022). Social capital as protection against the mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Sociol. 7:728541. 10.3389/fsoc.2022.72854135516815 Becker R. Voting behavior as social action: habits, norms, values, and rationality in electoral participation. Ration Soc. (2023) 35:81–109. 10.1177/10434631221142733 Kulachai W Lerdtomornsakul U Homyamyen P. Factors influencing voting decision: a comprehensive literature review. Soc Sci. (2023) 12:469. 10.3390/socsci12090469 Hipp JR. Collective efficacy: how is it conceptualized, how is it measured, and does it really matter for understanding perceived neighborhood crime and disorder? J Crim Justice. (2016) 49:32–44. 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.01627069285 Carroll J Reese D. Community collective efficacy: structure and consequences of perceived capacities in the blacksburg electronic village. In: 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. (2003). 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174585 Drakulich KM. Social capital and collective efficacy. In: G. Bruinsma and D. Weisburd, editors. Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice, New York, NY: Springer (2014). p. 4891–99. 10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_428 Sampson R. Neighbourhood and community: collective efficacy and community safety. New Econ. (2004) 11:106–13. 10.1111/j.1468-0041.2004.00346.x Prince DM Hohl B Hunter BA Thompson AB Matlin SL Hausman AJ . Collective efficacy as a key context in neighborhood support for urban youth. Am J Community Psychol. (2019) 63:179–89. 10.1002/ajcp.1231130843253 Bennett GG McNeill LH Wolin KY Duncan DT Puleo E Emmons KM. Safe to walk? Neighborhood safety and physical activity among public housing residents. PLoS Med. (2007) 4:e306. 10.1371/journal.pmed.004030617958465 Rees-Punia E Hathaway ED Gay JL. Crime, perceived safety, and physical activity: a meta-analysis. Prevent Med. (2018) 111:307–13. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.01729157975 da Silva IC Payne VL Hino AA Varela AR Reis RS Ekelund U . Physical activity and safety from crime among adults: a systematic review. J Phys Activity Health. (2016) 13:663–70. 10.1123/jpah.2015-015626694628 Bicchieri C Muldoon R. Social norms. In: Z. N. Edward, U. Nodelman., editors. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University (2014). Deliens T Deforche B De Bourdeaudhuij I Clarys P. Determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in university students: a qualitative study using focus group discussions. BMC Public Health. (2015) 15:201. 10.1186/s12889-015-1553-425881120 Kekäläinen T Tammelin TH Hagger MS Lintunen T Hyvärinen M Kujala UM . Personality, motivational, and social cognition predictors of leisure-time physical activity. Psychol Sport Exerc. (2022) 60:102135. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102135 Kim J Dunn E Rellinger K Robertson-Wilson J Eys M. Social norms and physical activity in american and Canadian contexts: a scoping review. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. (2017) 12:1–23. 10.1080/1750984X.2017.1354229 Li N Huang Q Ge X He M Cui S Huang P . A review of the research progress of social network structure. Complexity. (2021) 2021:e6692210. 10.1155/2021/6692210 Macdonald-Wallis K Jago R Sterne JAC. Social network analysis of childhood and youth physical activity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. (2012) 43:636–42. 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.02123159259 Prochnow T Delgado H Patterson MS Umstattd Meyer MR. Social network analysis in child and adolescent physical activity research: a systematic literature review. J Phys Activity Health. (2020) 17:250–60. 10.1123/jpah.2019-035031923901 Prochnow T Patterson MS. Assessing social network influences on adult physical activity using social network analysis: a systematic review. Am J Health Promot. (2022) 36:537–58. 10.1177/0890117121106070134898289 Kurlychek MC. Social control. In: G. Bruinsma and D. Weisburd, editors. Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice, New York, NY: Springer (2014). p. 4899–4908. 10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_360 Knoll N Burkert S Scholz U Roigas J Gralla O. The dual-effects model of social control revisited: relationship satisfaction as a moderator. Anxiety Stress Coping. (2012) 25:291–307. 10.1080/10615806.2011.58418821623480 Scholz U Stadler G Berli C Lüscher J Knoll N. How do people experience and respond to social control from their partner? Three daily diary studies. Front Psychol. (2021) 11:613546. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.61354633519637 Smith GSE Moyle W Burton NW. The relationship between social support for physical activity and physical activity across nine years in adults aged 60–65 years at baseline. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2023) 20:4531. 10.3390/ijerph2005453136901538 Choi M Mesa-Frias M Nuesch E Hargreaves J Prieto-Merino D Bowling A . Social capital, mortality, cardiovascular events and cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol. (2014) 43:1895–1920. 10.1093/ije/dyu21225369975 Carver A Akram M Barnett A Huang WY Gao GY Mellecker RR . Family, school and individual characteristics associated with adolescents' physical activity at school in Hong Kong: the iHealt(H) study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 18:14. 10.1186/s12966-021-01085-z33468170