The aging of South Korea’s population is occurring at a faster pace than any other country (1, 2). According to a demographic analysis, South Korea transitioned to an “aging society” in 2000, an “aged society” in 2018, and is projected to become a “super-aged” society by 2025 (1). This demographic shift is primarily attributed to the country’s low birth rate and the accelerated aging process. As a result, South Korea is anticipated to have the highest proportion of economically active individuals in 2025, followed by a subsequent decline. As a result, there is a growing expectation that the employment of older adults workers will rise to address the increasing labor shortages across various industries. Consequently, there is an ongoing upward trend in the percentage of workers aged 55 to 79 years (3). However, this aging workforce poses challenges in terms of workplace safety, as older adults employees are more susceptible to physiological declines in their sensory systems, equilibrium, and motor control (4–6). Therefore, there is a heightened need for policies that can effectively prevent occupational injuries among older workers in South Korea, given the impending labor shortages resulting from the rapid aging of the workforce.

Salminen (7) reviewed studies of non-fatal injuries and found that in 27% their results, there was no difference between older and younger workers; in 56%, younger workers are at most risk of a non-fatal injury; and the remaining 17%, older workers have more non-fatal injuries than younger workers. A comprehensive analysis of non-fatal injury data through a recent systematic review yielded the following results; out of the 57 studies reviewed, 49% (28 studies) indicated no significant correlation between workers’ age and non-fatal injuries. In 31% (18 studies), advancing age was even identified as a protective factor, suggesting that older workers experienced fewer non-fatal injuries compared to their younger counterparts. Conversely, 19% (11 studies) reported a higher risk of non-fatal injuries among older workers when compared to younger workers (8). Peng and Chan showed that the incidence of non-fatal accident among older workers is slightly (5.8%) lower than that of younger workers (9).

Earlier research conducted on the construction industry workforce indicated that advanced age at the time of injury was associated with increased injury-related costs, while the number of injuries was found to be unrelated to age. The elevated costs incurred by older workers can likely be attributed to the greater severity of their injuries (10–12). Therefore, younger workers may experience injuries more frequently, whereas older workers tend to sustain more severe injuries resulting in higher-cost claims (11).

These inconsistent findings may be attributed to the lack of a clear-cut definition for older workers and differences in the inclusion of industrial sectors as well as the analysis of injury severity among different studies (8).

The impact of workforce aging on work-related non-fatal injuries and the underlying reasons for the impact remain a subject of ongoing debate. The objective of this paper is to provide clarity on this matter.

We first compared the mean non-fatal work-related injuries among different age groups of men and women (Table 1). Aged workers accounted for 41.0% of work-related non-fatal injuries in men and 52.7% of work-related non-fatal injuries in women. Men comprised 80.4% of non-fatal injuries in non-aged workers, 71.8% of non-fatal injuries in aged workers, 76.6% of non-fatal injuries in overall workers. The average number of non-fatal injuries per year was 90,877.

The number of aged workers registered in the workers’ compensation system is not directly available. We therefore used the proportions of waged workers under 55-years-old and those 55-years-old or more of Local Area Labor Force Survey from 2017 to 2021 to estimate the number of workers who were registered for workers’ compensation. Based on these data, the mean estimated rate of work-related non-fatal injuries of aged workers (0.88/100) was about 2.5-times higher than that of younger workers (0.35/100) (Table 1). In addition, the estimated rate of work-related non-fatal injuries of all aged and young male workers was about two or three-times higher than those of all aged and young female workers.

We compared work-related non-fatal injuries in different industrial sectors (Table 2). Among aged workers, a largest proportion of work-related non-fatal injuries were in the “Construction” sector (36.0%), and this was followed by the “Service” sector (31.2%). However, the percentages of young workers with non-fatal injuries were greatest in the “Service” sector (34.7%) and then “Manufacturing” sector (29.6%). In addition, the proportion of aged workers in “Construction” sector was 57.1%. For the “Construction” sector, the estimated rate of work-related non-fatal injuries of both aged and younger workers was higher than average rate of those in overall industrial sectors (1.76/100 and 0.59/100 vs. 0.88/100 and 0.35/100). Moreover, the estimated rate of work-related non-fatal injuries of aged workers was approximately 3-times higher than that of younger workers (relative risk, 2.97) in the “Construction” sector. For the subsector of “Human health and social work activities”, which comprises 8.3 and 16.1% of the aged and younger workers in the “Service” sector, respectively, the estimated rate of work-related non-fatal injuries of both age groups was lower than the overall average rate in the “Service” sector (0.29/100 and 0.11/100 vs. 0.59/100 and 0.27/100). Although the estimated rate of work-related non-fatal injuries of aged and younger workers in “Mining and quarrying” sector was the highest, the proportion of aged workers in “Mining and quarrying” sector was the lowest among industrial sectors.

We also analyzed work-related non-fatal injuries according to occupational class (Table 3). Among aged workers, most work-related non-fatal injuries were for those with “elementary occupations” (45.0%), followed by “craft and related trade workers” (23.1%). Among young workers, these two classes were also responsible for most work-related non-fatal injuries. In addition, aged workers accounted for large percentages of workers employed in “elementary occupations” (46.5%), “skilled workers related to agriculture, forestry, and fisheries” (63.5%), and “craft and related trade workers” (49.7%). The highest estimated rate of work-related non-fatal injuries of aged workers was for those who were “skilled workers related to agriculture, forestry, and fisheries” (4.67/100), followed by “managers” (2.15/100) and “craft and related trade workers” (2.04/100). The estimated rates of work-related non-fatal injuries of young workers were also greatest for those employed as “skilled workers related to agriculture, forestry, and fisheries” (2.19/100), “managers” (1.84/100), and workers with “elementary occupations” (1.46/100). However, only a small proportion (less than 3%) of work-related non-fatal injuries were for “skilled workers related to agriculture, forestry, and fisheries” although the non-fatal injury rate in young and aged workers was highest among those workers. The estimated rates of work-related non-fatal injuries of aged workers employed in “elementary occupations” is similar to the average rate in overall occupational class.

We then compared work-related non-fatal injuries in different employment status (Table 4). The highest percentage of aged workers with work-related non-fatal injuries was for those employed as “regular workers” (51.5%) followed by “daily workers” (44.0%); the highest percentages for young workers were for those employed as “regular workers” (67.9%) followed by “daily workers” (27.4%). A comparison of all three categories of employment status showed that aged workers accounted for the largest percentage of “daily workers” (55.5%). Analysis of “daily workers” showed that the estimated rate of work-related non-fatal injuries in the aged (3.11/100) and younger workers (1.89/100) was much higher than the average rate in any other employment status or overall employment status.

Analysis of the types of accidents responsible for work-related non-fatal injuries (Table 5) showed that “trip & slip” (28.7%) was the most common cause, followed by “falling” (19.6%) in aged workers, however, “trip & slip” (16.8%) and “getting caught” (16.6%) were the major causes in young workers. According to further analysis by industrial sectors, “trip & slip” (48.0%) and “falling” (33.7%) were the most common cause in aged workers of “service” and “construction” sector, respectively, whereas “getting caught” (16.6%) was the major causes in young workers of “manufacturing” sector (data not shown). Aged workers accounted for large percentages of “trip & slip” (57.0%) and “falling” (53.8%) as the types of accidents.

We also analyzed the specific agents responsible for non-fatal injuries (Table 6). The main agent in aged and young workers was “buildings, structures, and surfaces (e.g., floor, steps, various building, and structural components, etc.)” (45.2 and 30.4%, respectively). However, “equipment and machinery” accounted for larger percentage in young workers (21.5%) than in aged workers (15.8%). Aged workers accounted for large percentages of “buildings, structures, and surfaces” (53.6%) as specific agents for injuries, whereas younger workers accounted for larger percentages of “equipment and machinery” (63.6%).

Previous studies have shown inconsistent findings regarding the association between workforce aging and work-related injuries (8). In our present study, we observed a significantly higher mean estimated rate of work-related non-fatal injuries per 100 workers among aged workers (0.88) compared to young workers (0.35). Our study utilized a representative national workers’ compensation database for South Korea, encompassing all industrial sectors and occupations over the past 5 years. These findings indicate that aged workers have a higher incidence of work-related non-fatal injuries compared to their younger counterparts. Two factors likely contribute to this increased incidence of injuries among aged workers in comparison to their younger counterparts.

First, the increased occurrence of aged workers participating in precarious employment and jobs likely contribute to their higher rate of non-fatal injuries. Our study of aged workers in South Korea from 2017 to 2021 revealed that the highest percentages of work-related non-fatal injuries were observed among workers in the “construction sector” (36.0%) and those in “elementary occupations” (unskilled workers) (45.0%). Additionally, a significant proportion of aged workers were employed in the “construction sector” (57.1%) and held an employment status of “daily worker” (55.5%). These findings indicate that work-related non-fatal injuries among aged workers are more likely to occur in industrial sectors, occupations, and employment statuses with a higher concentration of aged workers. In the present study, “construction sector” and employment status of “daily worker” were identified as precarious, as they exhibited higher rates of non-fatal injuries among young workers as well as aged workers. Consequently, aged workers who have precarious employment and jobs that expose them to greater occupational safety and health risks are more susceptible to work-related non-fatal injuries. Our previous publication also found that “elementary occupations” had the largest proportion of aged workers (19). Bravo et al. similarly found that the higher injury rate among aged workers may be attributed to the type of industry and employment contract, and nature of the occupation (8). For instance, industries such as construction and agriculture, which employ a substantial number of aged workers, typically experience higher fatality rates (8, 20). This suggests that employment in precarious employment and jobs makes aged workers more vulnerable to workplace injuries.

Second, the greater physical vulnerability of aged workers is likely the cause of their higher injury rate. Trip/slip and fall are the most common cause of non-fatal injuries (21, 22). Kemmlert and Lundholm conducted an analysis of the Swedish Occupational Injury Information System, which encompassed various industrial sectors. Their findings revealed that male workers aged 45 years and above had a higher occurrence of slip, trip, and fall incidents compared to workers under the age of 45 (23). In another investigation by Coantonio et al., workers’ compensation data from Ontario, Canada, was examined. The study revealed that falls accounted for 76% of traumatic brain injury (TBI) claims among construction workers aged 55 to 64, whereas only 45% of claims from workers aged 17 to 24 were related to TBI (23, 24). Furthermore, Schoenfisch et al. (25) found that injuries among more senior workers were more likely to cause serious problems that required longer hospitalization stays, indicating a slower recovery from injury. The present national representative study found that “trip/slip” and “falling” were the most common type of work-related non-fatal injury in aged workers than young workers. “Trip/slip” and “falling” may be related to the more limited physical abilities (muscle strength and agility) of aged workers. The physical, mental and motor skills (movement of arms, hands and legs) changes related to aging may affect older workers’ performance and their health and safety. Age-related decline in lower extremity muscle strength increases likelihood of slips and falls. Age-related decline in balance control, for which sensory inputs such as vision, proprioception, and vestibular sensations are important, are also associated with a greater risk of slips or falls (4, 6, 26). Furthermore, age-related osteoporotic bones are more likely to break as a result of workplace slips or falls. Our analysis of injury-causing agents also showed that “buildings, structures, and surfaces” was a more common cause of work-related non-fatal injuries in aged workers than young workers. In a study using self-reported data from injured carpentry workers (n = 4,429), the contributing factors to falls from the same level (“Trip/slip”) were found to be tripping over debris, difficult work terrain (rocky, muddy, uneven), the slope of the lot, lack of backfill around the foundation, and difficult access and/or egress from the building (27). Taken together, these results strongly suggest that the physical limitations of older adults workers were responsible for their higher frequency of occupational injuries. Other studies also reported that aged workers who had poor muscle strength and elasticity and limited range of joint motion were more likely to suffer from work-related fatal injuries (4, 28, 29).

Taken together, the increased occurrence of aged workers participating in precarious employment and jobs, along with the greater physical vulnerability, is likely the cause of their higher rate of work-related non-fatal injuries. This finding aligns with prior research, which similarly identified that precarious employment and jobs render aged workers more vulnerable to work-related injuries due to age-related declines in physical capabilities (8, 20).

Thus, implementing exercise programs aimed at improving the physical functional capacities, particularly balance and muscle strength, among aged workers, could prove beneficial in reducing the frequency of workplace injuries. For example, older workers should start low extremity muscle strengthening such as seated calf raises, seated knee lifts and leg lifts, seated leg extensions, standing leg lifts and sit-to-stand exercise, and then progress to squatting and core strengthening tailored to muscle strength status. They should also perform series of balance exercises such as standing with feet apart/together with eyes open, and then standing on one foot, with eyes open/closed based on balance control status.

The age structure of the workforce is currently changing significantly, defining the needs for creating age-friendly working conditions is becoming a priority in many countries. We can identify good practices in several countries. In USA, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) National Center for Productive Aging and Work seeks to advance lifelong well-being for workers of all ages and supports productive aging across the working life (30). The Center continues to work on such important issues as how organizations are addressing the needs of an aging workforce and identifying interventions and strategies to support both workers of all age groups and organizations that employ them. The European Agency for Safety and Health at Work coordinated the European campaign “Healthy workplaces for all ages” to promote sustainable work and healthy aging from the start of a person’s working life, and to prevent health problems and enable people to work for longer in 2016–2017 (31). Japanese government has developed and disseminated aging-friendly occupational health and safety guidelines with action checklist and good practices to prevent work-related injury in older workers according to industrial sectors (32).

The present study has several strengths. Firstly, it was based on a representative national workers’ compensation database for South Korea that encompasses all industrial sectors and occupations. Secondly, it estimated the incidences of work-related non-fatal injuries among aged workers in comparison to their younger counterparts.

Our research also had several limitations. Firstly, due to the cross-sectional design of the study, we are unable to establish causal relationships. Secondly, the precise incidence rates of work-related non-fatal injuries among aged workers could not be calculated due to the unavailability of the exact age distribution for all workers registered under the workers’ compensation scheme. Consequently, our data provides estimates of the incidence of work-related non-fatal injuries based on information derived from a representative Local Area Labor Force Survey. Finally, aging is not easily distinguishable between age groups. There is no universally agreed-upon age at which someone becomes an “aged worker.” Instead, it is often defined based on the specific needs, policies, or research objectives of a particular group or institution. Consequently, our results address the characteristics of non-fatal injuries among workers aged 55 years or older compared to those under 55 years, rather than among “aged workers” in a general sense.

The present study holds significant practical implications for mitigating the occurrence of work-related injuries. Firstly, it emphasizes the importance of directing greater attention towards aged workers, given their higher susceptibility to such injuries compared to their younger counterparts. Secondly, it underscores the necessity for improving occupational safety and health measures specifically tailored to individuals engaged in precarious employment and jobs, as a considerable number of aged workers fall into this category. Thirdly, it highlights the need for industries and occupations with a substantial aging workforce to establish a work environment that addresses the increased physical vulnerabilities of aged workers.

In conclusion, the number of aged workers in South Korea engaging in various economic activities and working as waged employees is consistently rising. The incidence of non-fatal work-related injuries is higher among aged workers compared to their younger counterparts. Combined with engagement in precarious employment and jobs, frailty likely contribute to having higher rate of work-related non-fatal injuries in aged workers. To mitigate workplace injuries, it is crucial for employers to enhance safety and health standards specifically tailored to the employment types and jobs most common among aged workers. Additionally, implementing preventive measures that enhance the physical and functional capabilities of aged workers, particularly focusing on balance and muscle strength, can play a vital role in averting work-related injuries in this demographic.

The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to MN, mino05@kosha.or.kr.

The studies involving humans were approved by Institutional Review Board of Ulsan University Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

JP: Writing – original draft. J-sP: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. YJ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. MN: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YK: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.