Front. Public Health Frontiers in Public Health Front. Public Health 2296-2565 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1219340 Public Health Review Does air pollution exposure affect semen quality? Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 93,996 Chinese men Liu Junjie 1 * † Dai Yanpeng 2 † Li Runqing 3 Yuan Jiayi 3 Wang Quanxian 1 Wang Linkai 1 1Henan Human Sperm Bank, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China 2Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China 3The Neonatal Screening Center in Henan Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

Edited by: Barbara Piekarska, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland

Reviewed by: Gennaro Lettieri, University Language Center, University of Naples Federico II, Italy; Nitya Kumar, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (Bahrain), Bahrain

 *Correspondence: Junjie Liu, zdsfyljj@zzu.edu.cn

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

 03 08 2023 2023 11 1219340 09 05 2023 21 07 2023 Copyright © 2023 Liu, Dai, Li, Yuan, Wang and Wang. 2023 Liu, Dai, Li, Yuan, Wang and Wang

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 Background

Air pollution may impair male fertility, but it remains controversial whether air pollution affects semen quality until now.

 Objectives

We undertake a meta-analysis to explore potential impacts of six pollutants exposure during the entire window (0–90 days prior to ejaculation) and critical windows (0–9, 10–14, and 70–90 days prior to ejaculation) on semen quality.

 Methods

Seven databases were retrieved for original studies on the effects of six pollutants exposure for 90 days prior to ejaculation on semen quality. The search process does not limit the language and search date. We only included original studies that reported regression coefficients (β) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The β and 95% CIs were pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird random effect models.

 Results

PM2.5 exposure was related with decreased total sperm number (10–14 lag days) and total motility (10–14, 70–90, and 0–90 lag days). PM10 exposure was related with reduced total sperm number (70–90 and 0–90 lag days) and total motility (0–90 lag days). NO2 exposure was related with reduced total sperm number (70–90 and 0–90 lag days). SO2 exposure was related with declined total motility (0–9, 10–14, 0–90 lag days) and total sperm number (0–90 lag days).

 Conclusion

Air pollution affects semen quality making it necessary to limit exposure to air pollution for Chinese men. When implementing protective measures, it is necessary to consider the key period of sperm development.

 semen analysis air pollution particulate matter meta-analysis systematic review LHGJ20190389 Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project section-at-acceptance Environmental health and Exposome Introduction

8–12% of reproductive-age couples are infertile in the world and its prevalence may be increasing (1). Male factors cause 40–50% of infertile couples (2). Total sperm number, sperm concentration, progressive and total motility are commonly adopted to evaluate male reproductive potential. Sperm quality of sperm donors in China’s Henan Province showed a decreasing trend from 2009 to b2019 (3). Although the exact cause remains unclear, air pollution might be a hazard factor for declining semen quality (4).

Particulate matter (PM) pollution included PM ≤ 10 μm (PM10) as well as PM ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5). Gaseous pollutants included sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3). Due to different economic growth levels and economic development patterns, air pollution varies greatly from place to place (5–9). Air pollution was serious in China due to rapid industrialization (10–13). Air pollution could cause respiratory symptoms (14–16), cardiovascular disease (17–20), kidney disease (21–23), adverse prenatal outcomes (24), and impaired neurodevelopment (25, 26). It remains controversial whether air pollution exposure during the whole sperm development window has an influence on sperm quality (27–47). A meta-analysis of relevant research data is needed.

The growth period of mature sperm is approximately 90 days, including three critical windows: 0–9 days prior to ejaculation (epididymal storage), 10–14 days prior to ejaculation (development of sperm motility), and 70–90 days prior to ejaculation (spermatogenesis) (48). There are fewer studies on which stage of sperm development is most vulnerable to air pollution, but the findings remain controversial (27, 29, 33, 34, 36–40, 42–44, 47). A meta-analysis of relevant research data is needed.

Although there are five systematic review and meta-analyses on whether semen quality is affected by air contaminants (49–53), the measured indicators of the four systematic review and meta-analyses were the mean differences and the exposure periods were not 90 days (49–52). The four systematic review and meta-analyses compare semen quality between men exposed to high levels of air pollution and men exposed to low levels of air pollution and were not standardized when merging the effects of air pollution from different studies (49–52). The main distinction between the reported four meta-analyses and the present work is that we have studied the association air pollution exposure during the whole 90 day period as well as the three critical windows of sperm development. A systematic review and meta-analysis by Xu et al. reported the effect of air pollution exposure during lag 0–90 days or 0–12 weeks on semen quality based on exposure-response relationships but did not report the effect of air pollution exposure during the three critical windows of sperm development (53). The included articles did not include those published in Chinese and those published recently in 2023, and subgroup or sensitivity analyses were also not performed (53). There is still no systematic review on whether semen quality is affected by air pollution exposure during the three critical windows of sperm development.

Therefore, the first meta-analysis was done for analyzing the relation of air pollution exposure during the whole and three critical windows of sperm development and sperm quality in China.

 Methods

The present meta-analysis was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (54) as well as PRISMA 2020 checklist had been provided in Supplementary Materials A. This meta-analysis was registered on the PROSPERO website (No. CRD42022374712). Literature search.

We retrieved the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, VIP, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) as well as Wanfang databases for articles. The search process does not limit the language and search date. Only epidemiological observational studies published in Chinese or English would be included. The applied search words and detailed search strategies are shown in Supplementary Table S1; Supplementary Materials B, respectively. Searches were performed independently by RL and JY Disagreement was resolved by a third author (JL)

Outcomes

Outcomes included total sperm number, sperm concentration, total and progressive motility.

 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria were: (a) reporting the effect of at least one air pollutant exposure during the whole window and/or critical stages of sperm development on sperm quality; (b) cross-sectional or cohort studies; (c) reporting regression coefficients (β) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs); (d) Chinese males; and (e) English and Chinese articles. The measured indicators of case-control studies were the means and standard deviations (SDs) rather than β and 95% CIs.

The following exclusion criteria were adopted: (a) animal studies, case reports, commentaries, reviews, protocols, editorials, conference abstracts, letters, or book chapters; (b) case-control studies; (c) studies in countries other than China; (d) reported shorter or longer exposure period; (e) focused on indoor air pollution; and (f) multivariate logistic regression.

 Study selection

Two authors (RL and JY) conducted the literature selection independently. If any disagreement arose during the selection process, it would be resolved by discussing with the third author (JL).

 Data extraction

Using a standardized form, the following information was extracted independently from eligible publications by two authors (RL and JY): publication year, first author, design of study, region, setting, research period, study subjects, size of the sample, pollutants exposure measurement, outcome, exposure period, statistical model, adjusted confounding factors, adjusted β with their corresponding 95% CIs. Through discussion with the third author (JL), any disagreement in the data extraction was resolved. The missing information of the original study was requested by contacting the corresponding author.

 Quality assessment

Quality assessments of eligible publications were executed independently by two researchers (QW and LW). If there was any inconsistent opinion, it would be resolved by discussing with the third researcher (YD). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist was adopted for evaluating the quality of retrospective as well as prospective cohort studies (55). The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist was adopted for evaluating the quality of cross-sectional studies (56). Based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines (57), the certainty of evidence was started with moderate and further downgraded based on the following items: publication bias, directness, study limitations, consistency, and precision (58, 59), and upgraded for dose-response gradient, strong effect size as well as plausible confounding effect (60).

 Data analyses

If the articles did not give interquartile range (IQR) values or original incremental units of pollutant exposure, we would contact the authors by email. For parts per billion (ppb) units, the following equations were used to convert to μg/m3: 1 ppb = 48/22.4 μg/m3 (O3); 1 ppb = 46/22.4 μg/m3 (NO2). It was assumed that the standard ratio of 24 h average, 8 h max, and 1 h max was 8:15:20, which was widely used for O3 conversion (61–63). To improve comparability, we converted all estimates to 24-h average. The standardized increment was 10 μg/m3 in this study, otherwise it would be converted using the following formula (64, 65):

β ( standardized ) = β ( original ) × Increment ( 10 ) / Increment ( original )

Statistical analyses were conducted with Stata v12.1 (Stata Corp., United States). The β and 95% CIs were combined using the DerSimonian-Laird random effect models. Chi-squared test and I2 statistics were used to quantify the heterogeneity. Heterogeneity existed when p < 0.05 or I2 > 50% (66). In order to find sources of heterogeneity, we conducted sub-group analyses based on design of the study (cross-sectional and cohort), location (northern and southern China), and exposure assessment approaches (estimating models or monitoring station). Egger’s test as well as funnel plots were adopted for assessing publication bias. Stability of the findings was judged with the help of sensitivity analysis. p < 0.05 was statistical significance.

 Results Study characteristics

As depicted in Figure 1, 3,952 publications were retrieved from the seven databases, and 34 articles remained after duplicate literature, abstracts and titles exclusion. After reading the full article, 14 articles were further excluded and detailed exclusion reasons were given in Supplementary Table S2. The remaining 21 eligible publications were eventually included in this meta-analysis. Missing data of original articles were requested by contacting the authors via email or WeChat. Studies with missing information were excluded if multiple contacts with the corresponding author remained unanswered. Table 1 illustrates the primary characteristics of the eligible publications. Table 2 demonstrates the original incremental units, outcomes, statistical models used and adjusted confounding factors of all the eligible studies. If the increment unit of the original study was not 10 μg/m3, effect sizes were converted. The credibility of the evidence was categorized as very low or low (Supplementary Table S3).

Flow diagram of literature selection.

Characteristics of the included studies in this meta-analysis.

Author publication year Study design Location Setting Study period Subjects Sample size Exposure measurement Qualitya,b
Dai et al. (2022) Cohort East China Urban 2014–2019 Male partners of infertile couples 1,494 men Air monitoring station 6 (NOS)
Guan et al. (2020) Cohort East China Urban and rural 2015–2017 Male partners of infertile couples 1955 men with 2073 semen samples Inverse distance weighting model 7 (NOS)
Huang et al. (2019) Cohort Central China Urban 2014–2015 Male partners of infertile Couples 1,081 with 1,278 semen samples Air monitoring station 7 (NOS)
Huang et al. (2020) Cohort South China Urban 2018–2019 Sperm donors 1,168 men with 3,797 semen samples Inverse distance weighting model 8 (NOS)
Lao et al. (2018) Cross-sectional East China Urban and rural 2001–2014 Men from the general population 6,475 men Hybrid spatiotemporal model 8 (JBI)
Liu et al. (2017) Cohort Central China Urban 2013–2015 Male partners of infertile couples 1759 men with 2,184 semen samples Inverse distance weighting model 8 (NOS)
Ma et al. (2022) Cohort Central China Urban and rural 2015–2020 Male partners of infertile couples 15,112 men with 28,267 semen samples Inverse distance weighting model 8 (NOS)
Ma et al. (2023) Cohort Central China Urban and rural 2015–2020 Male partners of infertile couples 15,112 men with 28,267 semen samples Inverse distance weighting model 8 (NOS)
Qiu et al. (2020) Cohort Southwest China Urban 2013–2018 Sperm donors 686 men with 4,841 semen samples Air monitoring station 7 (NOS)
Tian et al. (2017) Cohort Central China Urban 2013–2015 Male partners of infertile couples 1780 men Air monitoring station 7 (NOS)
Wang et al. (2018) Cross-sectional Central China Urban 2013–2015 Male partners of infertile couples 1827 men Air monitoring station 7 (JBI)
Wang et al. (2020) Cross-sectional Central China Urban and rural 2013–2015 Male partners of infertile couples 1852 men Air monitoring station 7 (JBI)
Wu et al. (2017) Cohort Central China Urban 2013–2015 Male partners of infertile couples 1759 men with 2,184 semen samples Inverse distance weighting model 8 (NOS)
Wu et al. (2022) Cohort East China Urban 2014–2016 Fertile men from NUM-LIFE study 1,554 men Inverse distance weighting model 8 (NOS)
Yu et al. (2022) Cohort South China Urban 2019 Sperm donors 1,310 men with 4,912 semen samples Land-use random forest model 8 (NOS)
Zhang et al. (2019) Cohort North China Urban 2015–2018 Sperm donors 1,116 men with 8,945 semen samples Air monitoring station 7 (NOS)
Zhang et al. (2023) Cohort East China Urban 2019–2021 Sperm donors 1,515 men Inverse distance weighting model 8 (NOS)
Zhao et al. (2022) Cohort East China Urban and rural 2013–2019 Male partners of infertile couples 33,876 men Air monitoring station 7 (NOS)
Zhou et al. (2014) Cohort Southwest China Urban and rural 2007–2013 Healthy fertile men 1,346 men Air monitoring station 8 (NOS)
Zhou et al. (2018) Cohort Southwest China Urban 2014–2015 General college students 796 men Air monitoring station 7 (NOS)
Zhou et al. (2021) Cross-sectional North China Urban and rural 2018–2019 Male partners of infertile couples 423 men Ordinary Kringing model 8 (JBI)

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist was adopted for evaluating the quality of retrospective as well as prospective cohort studies and the maximum score is 9.

The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist was adopted for evaluating the quality of cross-sectional studies and the maximum score is 8.

NUM-LIFE, Nanjing Medical University Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; JBI, Joanna Briggs Institute.

Pollutants, outcomes, and statistical information of the 19 included studies.

Author publication year Outcome Exposure period (day) Pollutants (Original incremental unit) Statistical mode Adjusted confounding factors
Dai et al. (2022) Sperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motilityTotal motility 90 PM2.5 (IQR)PM10 (IQR) Multivariate linear regression models Age, abstinence days, education level, occupation, average ambient temperature, seasons, and gaseous air pollutants
Guan et al. (2020) Sperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motilityTotal motility 90 PM2.5 (IQR)PM10 (IQR) Multivariate linear regression models Age, abstinence days, semen volume
Huang et al. (2019) Sperm concentrationTotal sperm countTotal motility 90 PM2.5 (IQR) Multivariate linear mixed models Age, BMI, race, education, smoking, alcohol consumption, abstinence period, and season
Huang et al. (2020) Sperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motilityTotal motility 90 PM2.5 (μg/m3)PM10 (μg/m3)SO2 (μg/m3)NO2 (μg/m3)CO (mg/m3) Linear mixed-effect models Age, BMI, percent body fat, ethnic, marital status, childbearing history, career, smoking, alcohol consumption, abstinence period, season, a natural cubic spline function of time, a natural cubic spline function of temperature during exposure period
Lao et al. (2018) Sperm concentrationProgressive motilityTotal motilityPercentage of normal morphology 90 PM2.5 (5 μg/m3) Multivariate linear regression models Age, education level, smoking status, alcohol drinking, exercise and occupational exposure to asbestos and organic solvent, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose and total cholesterol levels, season, year of medical examination
Liu et al. (2017) Sperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motilityTotal motilityTotal motile sperm count 90 SO2 (IQR)NO2 (IQR)CO (IQR)O3 (IQR) Multiple linear regression analysis Age, BMI, race, education, smoking amount, alcohol consumption, and abstinence period, temperature, season
Ma et al. (2022) Sperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motilityTotal motilityProgressively motile sperm countTotal motile sperm count 90 PM2.5 (IQR)PM10 (IQR) Linear mixed-effects models Age, BMI, smoking, drinking, occupation, abstinence period, month (at the date of semen collection) and temperature (average temperature of contemporary period)
Ma et al. (2023) Sperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motilityTotal motilityProgressively motile sperm countTotal motile sperm count 90 SO2 (IQR)NO2 (IQR)CO (IQR)O3 (IQR) Linear mixed-effects models Age, BMI, smoking, drinking, occupation, abstinence period, month (at the date of semen collection) and temperature (average temperature of contemporary period)
Qiu et al. (2020) Semen volumeSperm concentrationProgressive motility 90 PM2.5 (μg/m3)PM10 (μg/m3)SO2 (μg/m3)NO2 (μg/m3)CO (mg/m3)O3 (1ppb) Linear mixed-effects models Abstinence days, age, BMI, education level, year of sample collection, relative humidity (current day, 90-day preceding), temperature (current day, 90-day preceding)
Tian et al. (2017) Sperm concentrationTotal sperm count 90 O3 (μg/m3) Multivariate linear mixed models Age, BMI, education level, smoking status, seasons of semen collection, abstinence days, average temperature, average relative humidity
Wang et al. (2018) Semen volumeSperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motilityTotal motility 90 PM10 (10 μg/m3) Multiple linear regression analysis Age, BMI, education level, smoking status, abstinence days, seasons of semen collection, average temperature, average relative humidity
Wang et al. (2020) Sperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motility 90 SO2 (IQR)NO2 (IQR) Multivariate linear regression models BMI, education level, smoking, age, and abstinence period, temperature, humidity, season, and PM2.5
Wu et al., (2017) Sperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motilityTotal motility 90 PM2.5 (IQR)PM10 (IQR) Multivariate linear regression models Age, BMI, ethnic, education, smoking, alcohol consumption, abstinence period, season and temperature
Wu et al. (2022) Semen volumeSperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motilityTotal motility 90 PM2.5 (10 μg/m3) Multivariate linear regression models Age, BMI, ethnicity, education, smoking status, drinking status, family income, abstinence period, season, and temperature
Yu et al. (2022) Sperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motilityTotal motility 90 PM2.5 (IQR)PM10 (IQR) Linear mixed-effect models Age. BMI, percent body fat, education, ethnic, martial status, childbearing history, career, smoking, drinking, abstinence period, month, a natural cubic spline function of temperature during exposure period
Zhang et al. (2019) Sperm concentrationProgressive motility 90 PM2.5 (μg/m3)PM10 (μg/m3)SO2 (μg/m3)NO2 (μg/m3)CO (mg/m3)O3 (μg/m3) Linear mixed-effect models Age, abstinence duration, month, average temperature
Zhang et al. (2023) Sperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motilityTotal motility 90 PM2.5 (μg/m3)PM10 (μg/m3)SO2 (μg/m3)NO2 (μg/m3)CO (μg/m3)O3 (μg/m3) Multivariate linear regression models Age, ethnicity, season of semen collection, abstinence period and temperature.
Zhao et al. (2022) Sperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motilityTotal motility 90 PM2.5 (IQR)PM10 (IQR) Linear mixed-effect models Ethnicity, age, educational level, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, season of semen collection, abstinence period, temperature, relative humidity, and gaseous pollutants
Zhou et al. (2014) Semen volumeSperm concentrationProgressive motilityTotal motilityPercentage of normal morphology 90 PM10 (μg/m3)SO2 (μg/m3)NO2 (μg/m3) Multiple linear regression analysis Age, education, smoking, BMI, alcohol use, abstinence time period and season
Zhou et al. (2018) Semen volumeSperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motilityPercentage of normal morphology 90 PM2.5 (μg/m3)PM10 (μg/m3) Multiple linear regression analysis Age, smoking, alcohol use, BMI and abstinence time
Zhou et al. (2021) Sperm concentrationTotal sperm countProgressive motilityTotal motility 90 PM2.5 (μg/m3)PM10 (μg/m3)SO2 (μg/m3)NO2 (μg/m3)CO (mg/m3)O3 (μg/m3) Multiple linear regression models Abstinence, age, BMI, socioeconomic status, smoking status, alcohol consumption, psychological stress, exposures to heat, metals or solvents, average ambient air temperature, multi-time windows and multi-pollutants

PM2.5, particulate matter with the diameter ≤ 2.5 μm; PM10, particulate matter with diameter ≤ 10 μm; SO2, sulfur dioxide; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; CO, carbon monoxide; O3, ozone; BMI, body mass index; IQR, inter-quartile rages (IQR).

 Air pollutants and sperm quality

Six air pollutants exposure during the whole window did not affect sperm concentration (Supplementary Table S4; Figure 2). PM10, SO2, and NO2 exposure during the whole window were related with decreased total sperm number, while such association was not found for PM2.5, CO, and O3 exposure (Supplementary Table S4; Figure 2). PM2.5, PM10 as well as SO2 exposure during the entire window were negatively related with total motility, while such association was not found for other pollutants.

Regression coefficients and 95% confidence intervals for the relation between six pollutants exposure during the whole window and sperm quality.

In order to find sources of heterogeneity, we conducted sub-group analyses based on design of the study (cohort and cross-sectional), location (northern China and southern China), and exposure assessment approaches (monitoring station or estimating models). The majority of sub-group results were consistent with the pooled results (Supplementary Table S5; Figure 3).

Regression coefficients and 95% confidence intervals for the relation between six pollutants exposure during three critical windows and sperm quality.

During 0–9 lag days, only SO2 exposure was related with declined total motility (Supplementary Table S5; Figure 3). During 10–14 lag days, PM.2.5 exposure was adversely related with total sperm number and total motility, SO2 with total motility (Supplementary Table S5; Figure 3). During 70–90 lag days, PM10 and NO2 exposure were adversely related with total sperm number, PM2.5 with total motility (Supplementary Table S5; Figure 3).

 Sensitivity analysis

In the sensitivity analyses for six pollutants exposure during the whole window and sperm quality, pooled effect sizes did not change significantly by omitting one study from each analysis, thus indicating that our findings were stable (Supplementary Table S4; Supplementary Figure S1). However, when the study of Wu et al. (40) was omitted from sensitivity analyses of PM2.5 exposure and progressive motility, a significant association disappeared (p = 0.081; Supplementary Table S4; Supplementary Figure S1A). When the study of (34) was omitted from sensitivity analyses of PM10 exposure and sperm concentration, a significant association disappeared (p = 0.119; Supplementary Table S4; Supplementary Figure S1B). When the study by Ma et al. (33) was omitted from the sensitivity analysis of O3 exposure and total motility, a significant association disappeared (p = 0.104; Supplementary Table S4; Supplementary Figure S1F).

In the sensitivity analyses of six pollutants exposure during critical windows and sperm quality, the pooled effect sizes did not change significantly by omitting one study from each analysis, thus indicating that our findings were stable. However, when the study of Ma et al. (33) was omitted from the sensitivity analyses of O3 (70–90 lag days) exposure and total motility, a significant association disappeared (p = 0.197) with heterogeneity decreasing from 51 to 0% (Supplementary Table S5).

 Discussion Summary of study results

China has a population of more than 1.4 billion and covers a land area of approximately 9.6 million km2. Due to the vast territory of China, it varies greatly in climate conditions, landforms, geography, population density, and economic development level in different regions. Based on economic development levels and climatic conditions, China is generally grouped into seven geographic regions (67–69). Detailed geographic location is presented in Supplementary Figure S2. China is roughly classified as southern and northern China (70–72). Distribution of southern and northern China is shown in Figure 4. As a result of the limited sample size, we performed sub-group analysis by location (northern China and southern China). Air quality is closely related with climatic conditions and economic development levels. Air quality is better in western China than in eastern China (67). Economic development levels in western and eastern regions result in different chemical compositions of pollutants (73, 74). In the eastern and central regions, industry and traffic are the primary causes of air pollution (75). Biomass burning and soil dust are the primary reasons of air pollution in the western region. Different sources of air pollution in different regions result in different toxicity, concentrations, and chemical compositions. This may explain, to some extent, the inconsistent results.

Distribution of northern and southern China.

Different individual exposure assessment approaches can partially explain the controversial results. Lao et al. estimated individual exposure levels of PM2.5 using a high-resolution (1 × 1 km) spatiotemporal model (31). Zhou et al. (44) adopted the ordinary Kriging model to measure individual exposure concentrations. Some studies used the land-use random forest model (41) or inverse distance weighting model (28, 29, 32, 34, 39, 40) to assess the actual individual exposure levels. Some other studies used the averaged levels of the city-wide or the nearest monitoring station to assess actual individual pollutant exposure concentrations (27, 30, 35–38, 42, 43, 45, 46).

This is the first meta-analysis to analyze potential impacts of ambient air pollution exposure during the whole window and three critical windows on semen quality in China. Sperm motility, a conventional semen parameter, is one of the common indicators of fertility assessment. Sperm motility is commonly used as one of the most important sperm functions to determine whether female partners can successfully conceive without any assisted reproductive technology (ART). Sperm motility parameters are also sensitive indicators of male reproductive toxicity (76). PM10, PM2.5 as well as SO2 exposure were adversely related with total motility during 0–90 days prior to ejaculation. PM2.5, CO as well as O3 exposure were adversely related with total sperm number during 0–90 lag days.

In order to find sources of heterogeneity, we conducted sub-group analyses based on design of the study (cohort and cross-sectional), location (northern China and southern China), and exposure assessment approaches (monitoring station or estimating models). Although subgroup analysis reduced heterogeneity to some extent, heterogeneity remained high level in some subgroups, and it was necessary to continue to explore potential sources of between-studies heterogeneity.

In addition, the possible exposure susceptibility window was also investigated. PM2.5 exposure affected total motility (10–14 and 70–90 lag days) and total sperm number (10–14 lag days). PM10 affected total sperm number (70–90 lag days). SO2 influenced total sperm number (0–9 and 10–14 lag days). NO2 affected total sperm number (70–90 lag days). The findings suggested that pollutants exposure might affect total motility and total sperm number.

 Biological mechanisms

The biological mechanisms that environmental pollutant exposure may damage the development of total motility have not been elucidated. PM10, PM2.5, and O3 exposure can lead to elevated concentrations of reactive oxygen species (77, 78), which may disrupt the blood-testis barrier, detriment spermatogenesis and result in declined sperm motility (79–82). PM exposure can also cause systemic inflammatory reactions by elevating tumor necrosis factor (TNF) as well as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) levels (83–86). Higher concentrations of IL-1β and TNF are related with impaired total sperm motility (87–89). Significant reduction in air pollutants emissions was accompanied by improvements in people’s markers of inflammatory conditions, thrombosis as well as oxidation stress (90). We hypothesized that environmental pollutant exposure would elevate oxidative stress levels and inflammatory reactions, which could lead to decreased total sperm motility. This hypothesis requires further toxicological studies to elucidate the detailed mechanism of reduced sperm motility caused by environmental pollutant exposure.

 Strengths and limitations

This present meta-analysis has three advantages. First, it is the first meta-analysis to analyze whether semen quality is affected by air pollution exposure during the whole and critical windows. Second, the findings are relatively new as a result of most eligible studies being published within recent 4 years. Third, results of different original studies were difficult to compare since the exposure increment units were different in most cases. Therefore, the comparability of the results was improved by standardizing the data through transformation.

However, the present meta-analysis still has four limitations. First, a high degree of heterogeneity for some pollutants was found, which may be explained by differences in pollutant concentrations, types of air pollutants, chemical components of particulate matter, individual exposure assessment approaches, design of the study, study setting, sample size, study regions, selection bias, and adjustment confounding factors. Due to the high degree of heterogeneity, caution should be given when interpreting some pooled effects. A high degree of heterogeneity may also hinder the detection of publication bias. Second, selective bias may occur due to some of the included studies selecting patients from infertility clinics. Third, subgroup analysis by exposure assessment approaches was not performed as a result of the insufficient sample size. Fourth, the sample size is still inadequate, with only 2 articles from northern China being included. Insufficient data might lead to inescapable errors, and the original researches need to be further supplemented. Fifth, many of the included studies obtained estimates of air pollution exposure from ecological data or modeling and did not examine individual exposure to air pollution.

 Conclusion

This evidence suggested that ambient air pollution could reduce semen quality in Chinese men and may even lead to infertility. For Chinese men, there is a need to reduce the duration of exposure. Further studies should be conducted to explore the possible biological mechanisms behind the findings observed in this study.

 Author contributions

JL and YD proposed the idea and designed the present study, interpreted the findings, and were responsible for statistical analysis and manuscript writing. RL and JY performed literature retrieval, study selection, and data extraction. QW and LW performed the quality assessment. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

 Funding

The present study was funded by the Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project (No. LHGJ20190389).

 Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

 Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

We thank authors of the included eligible studies for their timely responses to our questions.

 Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1219340/full#supplementary-material

 References Inhorn MC Patrizio P . Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Hum Reprod Update. (2015) 21:411–26. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv016, PMID: 25801630 Odisho AY Nangia AK Katz PP Smith JF . Temporal and geospatial trends in male factor infertility with assisted reproductive technology in the United States from 1999-2010. Fertil Steril. (2018) 110:5–11. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.008 Liu J Dai Y Li Y Yuan E Wang Q Wang X . A longitudinal study of semen quality among Chinese sperm donor candidates during the past 11 years. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:10771. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67707-x, PMID: 32612270 Krzastek SC Farhi J Gray M Smith RP . Impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential. Transl Androl Urol. (2020) 9:2797–813. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-685, PMID: 33457251 Jones MR Diez-Roux AV Hajat A Kershaw KN O'Neill MS Guallar E . Race/ethnicity, residential segregation, and exposure to ambient air pollution: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Am J Public Health. (2014) 104:2130–7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302135, PMID: 25211756 Su JG Jerrett M de Nazelle A Wolch J . Does exposure to air pollution in urban parks have socioeconomic, racial or ethnic gradients? Environ Res. (2011) 111:319–28. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2011.01.002 Zhang Y Zhang H Fu Y Wang L Wang T . Effects of industrial agglomeration and environmental regulation on urban ecological efficiency: evidence from 269 cities in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. (2021) 28:66389–408. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15467-0, PMID: 34331229 Jiang M Kim E Woo Y . The relationship between economic growth and air pollution-a regional comparison between China and South Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:17. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082761, PMID: 32316262 Li Y Chiu YH Lin TY . The impact of economic growth and air pollution on public health in 31 Chinese cities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:393. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030393, PMID: 30704130 Liu L Yang X Liu H Wang M Welles S Márquez S . Spatial-temporal analysis of air pollution, climate change, and Total mortality in 120 cities of China, 2012-2013. Front Public Health. (2016) 4:143. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00143, PMID: 27486572 Zeng Y Cao Y Qiao X Seyler BC Tang Y . Air pollution reduction in China: recent success but great challenge for the future. Sci Total Environ. (2019) 663:329–37. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134180, PMID: 32380626 Song C Wu L Xie Y He J Chen X Wang T . Air pollution in China: status and spatiotemporal variations. Environ Pollut. (2017) 227:334–47. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.075, PMID: 28482313 Guo P Umarova AB Luan Y . The spatiotemporal characteristics of the air pollutants in China from 2015 to 2019. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0227469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227469, PMID: 32822345 Collaco JM Aoyama BC Rice JL McGrath-Morrow SA . Influences of environmental exposures on preterm lung disease. Expert Rev Respir Med. (2021) 15:1271–9. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1941886, PMID: 34114906 Guan WJ Zheng XY Chung KF Zhong NS . Impact of air pollution on the burden of chronic respiratory diseases in China: time for urgent action. Lancet. (2016) 388:1939–51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31597-5, PMID: 27751401 Dutta A Jinsart W . Air pollution in Delhi, India: It's status and association with respiratory diseases. PLoS One. (2022) 17:e0274444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274444, PMID: 36126064 Cosselman KE Navas-Acien A Kaufman JD . Environmental factors in cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2015) 12:627–42. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.152, PMID: 26461967 Hayes RB Lim C Zhang Y Cromar K Shao Y Reynolds HR . PM2.5 air pollution and cause-specific cardiovascular disease mortality. Int J Epidemiol. (2020) 49:25–35. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz114, PMID: 31289812 Joshi SS Miller MR Newby DE . Air pollution and cardiovascular disease: the Paul wood lecture, British cardiovascular society 2021. Heart. (2022) 108:1267–73. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319844, PMID: 35074847 Franklin BA Brook R Arden Pope C . Air pollution and cardiovascular disease. Curr Probl Cardiol. (2015) 40:207–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2015.01.003, PMID: 25882781 Chen Y Cao F Xiao JP Fang XY Wang XR Ding LH . Emerging role of air pollution in chronic kidney disease. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. (2021) 28:52610–24. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16031-6, PMID: 34448134 Xu X Nie S Ding H Hou FF . Environmental pollution and kidney diseases. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2018) 14:313–24. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2018.11, PMID: 29479079 Okoye OC Carnegie E Mora L . Air pollution and chronic kidney disease risk in oil and gas-situated communities: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Int J Public Health. (2022) 67:1604522. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604522 Ghosh R Causey K Burkart K Wozniak S Cohen A Brauer M . Ambient and household PM2.5 pollution and adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-regression and analysis of attributable global burden for 204 countries and territories. PLoS Med. (2021) 18:e1003718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003718, PMID: 34582444 Morris RH Counsell SJ McGonnell IM Thornton C . Early life exposure to air pollution impacts neuronal and glial cell function leading to impaired neurodevelopment. BioEssays. (2021) 43:e2000288. doi: 10.1002/bies.202000288, PMID: 33751627 Levy RJ . Carbon monoxide pollution and neurodevelopment: a public health concern. Neurotoxicol Teratol. (2015) 49:31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2015.03.001, PMID: 25772154 Dai X Chen G Zhang M Mei K Liu Y Ding C . Exposure to ambient particulate matter affects semen quality: a case study in Wenzhou, China. J Androl. (2023) 11:444–55. doi: 10.1111/andr.13326, PMID: 36252264 Guan Q Chen S Wang B Dou X Lu Y Liang J . Effects of particulate matter exposure on semen quality: a retrospective cohort study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. (2020) 193:110319:110319. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110319, PMID: 32087444 Huang G Zhang Q Wu H Wang Q Chen Y Guo P . Sperm quality and ambient air pollution exposure: a retrospective, cohort study in a southern province of China. Environ Res. (2020) 188:109756. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109756, PMID: 32531526 Huang X Zhang B Wu L Zhou Y Li Y Mao X . Association of Exposure to ambient fine particulate matter constituents with semen quality among men attending a fertility Center in China. Environ Sci Technol. (2019) 53:5957–65. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06942, PMID: 31013428 Lao XQ Zhang Z Lau AKH Chan TC Chuang YC Chan J . Exposure to ambient fine particulate matter and semen quality in Taiwan. Occup Environ Med. (2018) 75:148–54. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104529, PMID: 29133596 Liu Y Zhou Y Ma J Bao W Li J Zhou T . Inverse association between ambient Sulfur dioxide exposure and semen quality in Wuhan, China. Environmental Buyers' Guide. (2017) 51:12806–14. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03289, PMID: 28937752 Ma Y Peng X Pan Z Hu C Xia Q Cai G . Linear and non-linear relationships between sulfur dioxide and semen quality: a longitudinal study in Anhui. China Environ Res. (2023) 216:114731. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114731, PMID: 36368370 Ma Y Zhang J Cai G Xia Q Xu S Hu C . Inverse association between ambient particulate matter and semen quality in Central China: evidence from a prospective cohort study of 15,112 participants. Sci Total Environ. (2022) 833:155252. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155252 Qiu Y Yang T Seyler BC Wang X Wang Y Jiang M . Ambient air pollution and male fecundity: a retrospective analysis of longitudinal data from a Chinese human sperm bank (2013-2018). Environ Res. (2020) 186:109528. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109528, PMID: 32668535 Tian XJ Wang XC Ye B Li CL Zhang Y Ma L . The effects of exposure to ozone on sperm quality in Wuhan. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. (2017) 51:197–202. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2017.03.002, PMID: 28260331 Wang X Tian X Ye B Zhang Y Li C Liao J . Gaseous pollutant exposure affects semen quality in Central China: a cross-sectional study. Andrology. (2020) 8:117–24. doi: 10.1111/andr.12655 Wang XC Tian XJ Ye B Ma L Zhang Y Yang J . The effect of ambient PM(10) on sperm quality in Wuhan. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. (2018) 52:73–8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2018.01.014, PMID: 29334712 Wu L Jin L Shi T Zhang B Zhou Y Zhou T . Association between ambient particulate matter exposure and semen quality in Wuhan, China. Environ Int. (2017) 98:219–28. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.11.013, PMID: 27866723 Wu W Chen Y Cheng Y Tang Q Pan F Tang N . Association between ambient particulate matter exposure and semen quality in fertile men. Environ Health. (2022) 21:16. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00831-5, PMID: 35034648 Yu X Wang Q Wei J Zeng Q Xiao L Ni H . Impacts of traffic-related particulate matter pollution on semen quality: a retrospective cohort study relying on the random forest model in a megacity of South China. Sci Total Environ. (2022) 851:158387. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158387, PMID: 36049696 Zhang HT Zhang Z Cao J Tang WH Zhang HL Hong K . Ambient ozone pollution is associated with decreased semen quality: longitudinal analysis of 8945 semen samples from 2015 to 2018 and during pollution-control period in Beijing, China. AJA. (2019) 21:501–7. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_116_18, PMID: 30688213 Zhao Y Zhu Q Lin J Cai J . Association of Exposure to particulate matter air pollution with semen quality among men in China. JAMA Netw Open. (2022) 5:e2148684. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48684, PMID: 35175344 Zhou L Li L Hao G Li B Yang S Wang N . Sperm mtDNA copy number, telomere length, and seminal spermatogenic cells in relation to ambient air pollution: results of a cross-sectional study in Jing-Jin-Ji region of China. J Hazard Mater. (2021) 406:124308–124308. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124308, PMID: 33257117 Zhou N Cui Z Yang S Han X Chen G Zhou Z . Air pollution and decreased semen quality: a comparative study of Chongqing urban and rural areas. Environ Pollut (2014) 187:145–152. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.12.030, PMID: 24491300 Zhou N Jiang C Chen Q Yang H Wang X Zou P . Exposures to atmospheric PM10 and PM10-2.5 affect male semen quality: results of MARHCS study. Environ Sci Technol. (2018) 52:1571–81. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05206, PMID: 30516046 Zhang F Li H Xu W Song G Wang Z Mao X . Sulfur dioxide may predominate in the adverse effects of ambient air pollutants on semen quality among the general population in Hefei, China. Sci Total Environ. (2023):165681. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165681, PMID: 37481090 Ing NH Curley KO Welsh TH Johnson L Staub C . Anatomy and Physiology of the Male Reproductive System and Potential Targets of Toxicants. Comprehensive Toxicology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; (2018). 2–63. Deng Z Chen F Zhang M Lan L Qiao Z Cui Y . Association between air pollution and sperm quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. (2016) 208:663–9. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.10.044, PMID: 26552539 Qian H Xu Q Yan W Fan Y Li Z Tao C . Association between exposure to ambient air pollution and semen quality in adults: a meta-analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. (2022) 29:10792–801. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16484-9, PMID: 34532803 Zhang J Cai Z Ma C Xiong J Li H . Impacts of outdoor air pollution on human semen quality: a Meta-analysis and systematic review. Biomed Res Int. (2020) 2020:7528901. doi: 10.1155/2020/7528901, PMID: 32420369 Fathi Najafi T Latifnejad Roudsari R Namvar F Ghavami Ghanbarabadi V Hadizadeh Talasaz Z Esmaeli M . Air pollution and quality of sperm: a meta-analysis. Iran Red Crescent Med J. (2015) 17:e26930. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.17(4)2015.26930, PMID: 26023349 Xu R Zhong Y Li R Li Y Zhong Z Liu T . Association between exposure to ambient air pollution and semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ. (2023) 870:161892. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161892, PMID: 36731563 Page MJ McKenzie JE Bossuyt PM Boutron I Hoffmann TC Mulrow CD . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. (2021) 372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71, PMID: 33782057 Stang A . Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. (2010) 25:603–5. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z, PMID: 20652370 Moola S Munn Z Tufanaru C Aromataris E Sears K Sfetic R . Chapter 7: systematic reviews of etiology and risk. JBI Reviewer's Manual. (2019). doi: 10.46658/JBIRM-17-06 Morgan RL Thayer KA Bero L Bruce N Falck-Ytter Y Ghersi D . GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health. Environ Int. (2016) 92-93:611–6. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.004, PMID: 26827182 Balshem H Helfand M Schünemann HJ Oxman AD Kunz R Brozek J . GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. (2011) 64:401–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015 Guyatt GH Oxman AD Kunz R Brozek J Alonso-Coello P Rind D . GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol. (2011) 64:1283–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012, PMID: 21839614 Ravindra K Chanana N Mor S . Exposure to air pollutants and risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Sci Total Environ. (2021) 765:142772. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142772 Bell ML Dominici F Samet JM . A meta-analysis of time-series studies of ozone and mortality with comparison to the national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study. Epidemiology. (2005) 16:436–45. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000165817.40152.85, PMID: 15951661 Wong CM Vichit-Vadakan N Kan H Qian Z . Public health and air pollution in Asia (PAPA): a multicity study of short-term effects of air pollution on mortality. Environ Health Perspect. (2008) 116:1195–202. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11257, PMID: 18795163 Yin P Chen R Wang L Meng X Liu C Niu Y . Ambient ozone pollution and daily mortality: a Nationwide study in 272 Chinese cities. Environ Health Perspect. (2017) 125:117006. doi: 10.1289/EHP1849, PMID: 29212061 Huang S Zhang X Huang J Lu X Liu F Gu D . Ambient air pollution and body weight status in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. (2020) 265:114999. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114999, PMID: 32806418 Yang BY Qian Z Howard SW Vaughn MG Fan SJ Liu KK . Global association between ambient air pollution and blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. (2018) 235:576–88. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.001, PMID: 29331891 Higgins JP Thompson S Deeks JJ Jj D Altman DG Altman DG . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. (2003) 327:557–60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557, PMID: 12958120 Hao Y Niu X Wang J . Impacts of haze pollution on China's tourism industry: a system of economic loss analysis. J Environ Manag. (2021) 295:113051. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113051, PMID: 34182342 Tang H Zhang S Chen W . Assessing representative CCUS layouts for China's power sector toward carbon neutrality. Environ Sci Technol. (2021) 55:11225–35. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03401, PMID: 34323476 Li J Huang Y Zhang BN Fan JH Huang R Zhang P . Body mass index and breast cancer defined by biological receptor status in pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women: a multicenter study in China. PLoS One. (2014) 9:e87224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087224, PMID: 24489874 Hu Y Chen J Wang R Li M Yun C Li W . Vitamin D nutritional status and its related factors for Chinese children and adolescents in 2010-2012. Nutrients. (2017) 9:1024. doi: 10.3390/nu9091024, PMID: 28914773 Lv MQ Ge P Zhang J Yang YQ Zhou L Zhou DX . Temporal trends in semen concentration and count among 327 373 Chinese healthy men from 1981 to 2019: a systematic review. Hum Reprod. (2021) 36:1751–75. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab124, PMID: 34046659 Wang XD Yang X Xu HB Cao P Gao P Liang J . Exposure status and health risk assessment of deoxynivalenol from cereals in Chinese population in different regions. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. (2019) 53:394–7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.04.012, PMID: 30982274 Zheng J Yang X Hu S Wang Y Liu J . Association between short-term exposure to air pollution and respiratory diseases among children in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Health Res. (2022) 32:2512–32. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2021.1974822, PMID: 34601975 Liu Y Xie S Yu Q Huo X Ming X Wang J . Short-term effects of ambient air pollution on pediatric outpatient visits for respiratory diseases in Yichang city, China, Environ Pollut B (2017); 227:116–124. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.029, PMID: 28458242 Chai G He H Sha Y Zhai G Zong S . Effect of PM2.5 on daily outpatient visits for respiratory diseases in Lanzhou, China. Sci Total Environ. (2019) 649:1563–72. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.384 Kwack SJ Lee BM . Comparative cytotoxicity and sperm motility using a computer-aided sperm analysis system (CASA) for isomers of phthalic acid, a common final metabolite of phthalates. J Toxicol Environ Health A. (2015) 78:1038–50. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2015.1067503, PMID: 26252616 Kelly FJ . Oxidative stress: its role in air pollution and adverse health effects. Occup Environ Med. (2003) 60:612–6. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.8.612, PMID: 12883027 Saffari A Daher N Shafer MM Schauer JJ Sioutas C . Global perspective on the oxidative potential of airborne particulate matter: a synthesis of research findings. Environ Sci Technol. (2014) 48:7576–83. doi: 10.1021/es500937x, PMID: 24873754 Guthrie HD Welch GR . Effects of reactive oxygen species on sperm function. Theriogenology. (2012) 78:1700–8. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.05.002, PMID: 22704396 Takeshima T Yumura Y Yasuda K Sanjo H Kuroda S Yamanaka H . Inverse correlation between reactive oxygen species in unwashed semen and sperm motion parameters as measured by a computer-assisted semen analyzer. Asian J Androl. (2017) 19:350–4. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.173933, PMID: 26975485 Wei Y Cao XN Tang XL Shen LJ Lin T He DW . Urban fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure destroys blood-testis barrier (BTB) integrity through excessive ROS-mediated autophagy. Toxicol Mech Methods. (2018) 28:302–19. doi: 10.1080/15376516.2017.1410743, PMID: 29179619 Gurel C Kuscu GC Buhur A Dagdeviren M Oltulu F Karabay Yavasoglu NU . Fluvastatin attenuates doxorubicin-induced testicular toxicity in rats by reducing oxidative stress and regulating the blood-testis barrier via mTOR signaling pathway. Hum Exp Toxicol. (2019) 38:1329–43. doi: 10.1177/0960327119862006, PMID: 31272229 Guan L Geng X Stone C Cosky EEP Ji Y du H . PM2.5exposure induces systemic inflammation and oxidative stress in an intracranial atherosclerosis rat model. Environ Toxicol. (2019) 34:530–8. doi: 10.1002/tox.22707, PMID: 30672636 Xu F Shi X Qiu X Jiang X Fang Y Wang J . Investigation of the chemical components of ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) associated with in vitro cellular responses to oxidative stress and inflammation. Environ Int (2020) 136:105475. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105475, PMID: 32007923 Cao W Wang X Li J Yan M Chang CH Kim J . NLRP3 inflammasome activation determines the fibrogenic potential of PM(2.5) air pollution particles in the lung. J Environ Sci (China). (2022) 111:429–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2021.04.021, PMID: 34949371 Liu C Fonken LK Wang A Maiseyeu A Bai Y Wang TY . Central IKKβ inhibition prevents air pollution mediated peripheral inflammation and exaggeration of type II diabetes. Part Fibre Toxicol. (2014) 11:53. doi: 10.1186/s12989-014-0053-5, PMID: 25358444 Eggert-Kruse W Kiefer I Beck C Demirakca T Strowitzki T . Role for tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 1-beta (IL-1β) determination in seminal plasma during infertility investigation. Fertil Steril. (2007) 87:810–23. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.103, PMID: 17430733 Zhou L Su X Li B Chu C Sun H Zhang N . PM2.5 exposure impairs sperm quality through testicular damage dependent on NALP3 inflammasome and miR-183/96/182 cluster targeting FOXO1 in mouse. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. (2019) 169:551–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.108, PMID: 30476820 Moretti E Cosci I Spreafico A Serchi T Cuppone AM Collodel G . Semen characteristics and inflammatory mediators in infertile men with different clinical diagnoses. Int J Androl. (2009) 32:637–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00911.x, PMID: 18710409 Lin W Zhu T Xue T Peng W Brunekreef B Gehring U . Association between changes in exposure to air pollution and biomarkers of oxidative stress in children before and during the Beijing Olympics. Am J Epidemiol. (2015) 181:575–83. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu327, PMID: 25770981