Front. Public HealthFrontiers in Public HealthFront. Public Health2296-2565Frontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fpubh.2023.1079248Public HealthOriginal ResearchThe global, regional, and national burden of stomach cancer among adolescents and young adults in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A population-based studyZhangZiqiang*†WangJun†SongNing†ShiLiubinDuJianjun*Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Edited by: Terry Huang, City University of New York, United States
Reviewed by: Paul Zarogoulidis, Euromedica General Clinic, Greece; Ahmed Abduljabbar Jaloob Aljanaby, University of Kufa, Iraq; Ezequiel Pinto, University of Algarve, Portugal; Zeinab A. Kasemy, University of Menoufia, Egypt
*Correspondence: Jianjun Du ✉ dujjp@hotmail.comZiqiang Zhang ✉ zzqblue@hotmail.com
This article was submitted to Public Health and Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Background
Stomach cancer is a significant health problem in many countries. But healthcare needs of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) stomach cancer patients have been historically neglected. An accurate appraisal of the burden of AYA stomach cancer is crucial to formulating effective preventive strategies. In this study, we report the most recent estimates of AYA stomach cancer burden concerning socio-demographic index (SDI) in 204 countries and territories between 1990 and 2019.
Methods
Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease study 2019 were used to analyze incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to AYA stomach cancer at global, regional, and national levels. Association between AYA stomach cancer burden and SDI were investigated. All estimates are reported as absolute numbers and age-standardized rates, which were standardized to the GBD world population and reported per 100,000 population.
Results
In 2019, there were 49,000 incident cases, 27,895 deaths, and 1.57 million DALYs due to AYA stomach cancer globally. The highest age-standardized incidence rate occurred in East Asia [2.42 (women) and 4.71 (men) per 100,000 person-years] and high-income Asia Pacific [3.16 (women) and 2.61 (men) per 100,000 person-years]. Age-standardized death [1.53 (women) and 2.65 (men) per 100,000 person-years] and DALY [150.96 (women) and 87.13 (men) per 100,000 person-years] rates were highest in Oceania. Compared with 1990, in 2019 more than 1,075 more incident cases of AYA stomach cancer were estimated with a decrease of 7,784 deaths. Despite the increase in absolute number of incident cases, the worldwide age-standardized rates of AYA stomach cancer (incidence, deaths, and DALYs) have declined since 1990. The drop in the disease burden was associated with an improved SDI. Globally, 24.41% of the age-standardized DALYs were attributable to a high-sodium diet in both sexes combined, and 0.57% of the age-standardized DALYs were attributable to smoking in men.
Conclusion
The global burden of AYA stomach cancer is substantial, especially in developing regions. Capacity-building activities for AYA stomach cancer will benefit the younger generation and population health worldwide.
disease burdenstomach cancerincidencemortalityadolescentsyoung adultsNational Natural Science Foundation of China10.13039/5011000018091. Introduction
Stomach cancer accounts for a large proportion of the cancer burden (1) and is the most common cancer worldwide (2). The incidence and mortality rates of stomach cancer have declined over the last century (3). Tumors near or away from the gastroesophageal junction (cardia) are classified as cardia and non-cardia tumors, respectively (1). In most populations, the incidence and mortality rates of stomach cancer have decreased due to a decline in non-cardia stomach cancer rates, a trend associated with Helicobacter pylori infections (4, 5). It is known that H. pylori can be regarded as a carcinogen in non-cardia stomach cancer. Most adults are infected by H. pylori once in their lives (6). A decrease in infection rate can be attributed to improved socioeconomic status, hygiene practices, and widespread antibiotic use (7).
The prognosis of stomach cancer remains poor, even though the survival rate has improved over the past decades (8). The 5-year survival rate is ~20%. However, the survival rates were 65% in Japan (9) and 71.5% in South Korea (10), where population screening has improved the early-stage tumor detection rate (11). Nevertheless, some researchers imply that stomach cancer rates may be increasing among younger population in the United States, which might reverse the overall decrease in incidence (12, 13). South Korea has the highest rate of young patients with stomach cancer, with 15% diagnosed before the age of 45 years (14). There are striking differences in the genetic, proteomic, and clinical characteristics between early-onset stomach cancer (under 40 years old) and traditional late-onset stomach cancer (over 40 years old) (15–17). Early-onset stomach cancer displays a more diffuse histology, are highly metastatic, behave aggressively, exhibit molecular heterogeneity, and have poorer prognoses (17, 18).
Cancer in children and older adults has been a focus of research but recent studies have estimated a rising global burden of stomach cancer in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients (19, 20). The treatment for children would bring them decades of quality life and the incidence of most epithelial cancers increases with age. Thus, to some degree, cancers that occur during young adulthood, as a transition between pediatric and adult oncology, have received less attention from researchers. These types of cancers represent a distinct spectrum of illnesses occurring in younger people who have a large part of their expected lifespans remaining, contribute substantially to the economy and care for their families (21).
Consequently, studies on the specific issues unique to AYA patients with stomach cancer can improve the stomach cancer-related outcomes. In this dedicated analysis of the most recent data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019, we assessed the burden of AYA stomach cancer, described the AYA cancers tendency from 1990 to 2019 and evaluated the diversities caused by levels of human development and geographical differences, which can promote international and local interventions to reduce the disease burden and, perhaps, curb the rising incident cases numbers.
2. Methods2.1. Overview
The global, regional, and national AYA stomach cancer cases were determined based on the GBD 2019. According to the International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10), GBD 2019 divided cancers into 29 groups (22). Stomach cancer was coded as C16.0–C16.9 (malignant neoplasm of the stomach), Z12.0, and Z85.02-Z85.028 but did not include gastroesophageal junction tumors (23). The present analysis used the data on cancer incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) estimates to assess the cancer burden. A query tool provided by the Global Health Data Exchange was used to retrieve the data for this study.
2.2. Estimation of cancer burden
A series of capstone publications summarized the methodology of GBD 2019 in detail (24–27). Data on mortality were obtained from vital registrations and verbal autopsies. The estimated mortality data were multiplied by high-quality cancer registered incidence cases by the independently modeled mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR). A linear-step mixed-effects model was used to estimate the MIRs, which were smoothed and adjusted using spatiotemporal Gaussian process modeling (22). The modeled mortality estimates were derived from a cause of death ensemble model, including both the observed and estimated death data (24). The incidence estimate was calculated by dividing the modeled mortality estimate by the MIR. Disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) were obtained by adding years lived with disability (YLDs) and years of life lost (YLLs).
2.3. Socio-demographic index
The level of development was measured by using sociodemographic index (SDI), which is strongly associated with health outcomes. This measure is a combination of the total fertility rate of people who are <25 years old, the mean education achieved by people who are more than 15 years old, and the lag distributed income for each person. According to the GBD 2019 studies, SDI and values are available for each country by year (24).
2.4. Data analysis
As previously defined by AYA oncology, the study age group was 15–39 years (28). Based on the GBD 2019 study, data on stomach cancer burden among AYA patients were extracted at global, regional, and national levels for both sexes from 1990 to 2019. Cancer data were structured according to age groups (15–19, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34, and 35–39 years-old). The total number of incidence cases, deaths, and DALYs in all related aged groups (15–19 years to 35–39 years) were calculated. The truncated age standardized rates were computed using age-specific rate for age-groups, weighed using the GBD 2019 world standard population (24), according to methods proposed by Boyle and Parkin (29).
The outcomes were presented at the global, regional, and national levels for AYA stomach cancer. The SDI was analyzed using the LOWESS regression method to determine its association with age-standardized incidence, death, and DALY rates. With regard to the cancer burden, uncertainty exists owing to the diversity in availability and quality. Based on the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the allocation of 1,000 draws within the Bayesian modeling, 95% uncertainty intervals (95% UI) were calculated in conjunction with evaluations of cancer burden.
The Joinpoint regression program, version 4.9.1.0 (Statistical Research and Applications Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD), was used to calculate the annual percent changes (APCs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in age-standardized rates as described (30).
3. Results3.1. Global incidence, deaths, and DALYs due to AYA stomach cancer
In 2019, stomach cancer was the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death in adolescents and young adults worldwide (31). In the same year, more than 49,000 (95% UI: 45,008–53,078) AYA stomach cancer incident cases occurred globally, and 27,895 individuals (25,711–30,240) died (Table 1). The age-standardized incidence rate of AYA stomach cancer was 1.62 per 100,000 population. Meanwhile, the age-standardized mortality rate was 0.92 per 100,000 population. In 2019, the number of DALYs related to AYA stomach cancer worldwide was 1.57 million (1.45–1.70). Compared to that of women, men with AYA stomach cancer had higher age-standardized incidence and death rates (1.82 vs. 1.41 and 0.98 vs. 0.86 per 100,000 population, respectively).
Incident cases, deaths, and DALYs of AYA stomach cancer in 2019, and percentage change of age-standardized rates by sex and GBD region.
Incidence
Deaths
DALYs
Number of incident cases
Age-standardized incidence rate
Percentage change in rates, 1990–2019
Number of deaths
Age-standardized death rate
Percentage change in rates, 1990–2019
Number of DALYs
Age-standardized DALYs rate
Percentage change in rates, 1990–2019
Global
49,008 (45,008–53,078)
1.62
−30.90
27,895 (25,711–30,240)
0.92
−46.77
1573897 (1,448,736–1,703,548)
51.96
−46.43
Male
27,882 (24,956–31,033)
1.82
−22.74
14,972 (13,643–16,520)
0.98
−42.98
8,41,920 (766,656–927,599)
55.08
−42.56
Female
21,126 (18,841–23,541)
1.41
−39.30
12,924 (11,550–14,339)
0.86
−50.55
7,31,976 (653,421–814,243)
48.80
−50.24
East Asia
21,314 (18,107–24,881)
3.59
1.09
8,749 (7,519–10,098)
1.47
−46.3
4,92,053 (424,301–567,121)
82.86
−45.58
Southeast Asia
2,242 (1,924–2,634)
0.81
−44.8
1,643 (1,416–1,895)
0.59
−50.69
92,752 (80,019–106,784)
33.37
−50.52
Oceania
134 (98–178)
2.60
−0.01
107 (79–143)
2.09
−0.49
6,123 (4,518–8,137)
119.08
−0.10
Central Asia
744 (664–838)
1.90
−50.12
594 (529–672)
1.52
−51.67
33,384 (29,749–37,657)
85.29
−51.65
Central Europe
364 (315–418)
0.85
−47.21
249 (216–284)
0.58
−54.93
13,702 (11,901–15,633)
32.10
−54.84
Eastern Europe
2,037 (1,794–2,303)
2.37
−35.89
1,136 (1,002–1,279)
1.31
−50.16
62,836 (55,488–70,647)
73.15
−50
High-income Asia Pacific
1,767 (1,550–2,024)
2.88
−62.27
518 (480–559)
0.84
−77.25
29,127 (27,127–31,388)
47.58
−77.11
Australasia
74 (57–96)
0.69
−22.00
28 (24–33)
0.26
−43.56
1,573 (1,343–1,852)
14.65
−43.63
Western Europe
1,178 (1,010–1,367)
0.79
−38.38
496 (461–533)
0.33
−56.76
27,597 (25,590–29,611)
18.53
−56.74
Southern Latin America
301 (227–388)
1.14
−25.69
191 (165–217)
0.73
−37.97
10,714 (9,322–12,178)
40.74
−37.67
High-income North America
915 (791–1,064)
0.71
−0.50
376 (353–405)
0.29
−19.94
21,101 (19,825–22,685)
16.28
−19.65
Caribbean
197 (153–242)
1.09
−14.56
152 (117–187)
0.84
−17.49
8,589 (6,615–10,537)
40.24
−17.29
Andean Latin America
633 (486–799)
2.51
−24.16
457 (351–581)
1.81
−32.82
26,011 (20,099–32,995)
102.90
−32.82
Central Latin America
1,938 (1,604–2,315)
1.94
−2.87
1,227 (1,024–1,457)
1.23
−20.74
69,591 (58,199–82,570)
69.75
−20.6
Tropical Latin America
1,061 (998–1,130)
1.12
−30.51
773 (726–819)
0.81
−37.81
43,275 (40,729–45,836)
45.55
−37.45
North Africa and Middle East
2,770 (2,341–3,277)
1.03
−36.67
1,996 (1,658–2,398)
0.74
−44.35
112,629 (93,260–134,788)
42.04
−44.05
South Asia
8,655 (7,508–9,913)
1.17
−26.68
6,981 (6,075–8,025)
0.95
−28.43
397,614 (346,382–456,558)
53.71
−28.83
Central sub-Saharan Africa
342 (249.5–439)
0.77
−41.02
279 (204–364)
0.64
−40.46
15,836 (11,579–20,587)
35.76
−40.63
Eastern sub-Saharan Africa
1,109 (908–1,387)
0.80
−44.11
923 (748–1,155)
0.67
−43.05
52,086 (42,259–65,025)
37.52
−43.13
Southern sub-Saharan Africa
250 (199–310)
0.74
−46.28
203 (162–251)
0.60
−47.78
11,329 (9,036–14,000)
33.36
−47.57
Western sub-Saharan Africa
982 (791–1,197)
0.65
−28.09
815 (657–1,001)
0.55
−27.88
45,975 (37,045–56,553)
30.57
−27.95
The absolute numbers and age-specific rates of incidence, deaths, and DALYs for AYA stomach cancers in 2019, along with the associated 95% UIs, are presented by age group in Supplementary Tables S1–S5. From 1990 to 2019, the incidence rate per 100,000 annually decreased in all age groups [ages 15–19 years (from 0.36 to 0.21, APC = −1.84%, p < 0.001); ages 20–24 years (from 0.81 to 0.56, APC = −1.26%, p < 0.001); ages 25–29 years (from 1.53 to 1.11, APC = −1.02%, p < 0.001); ages 30–34 years (from 3.33 to 2.54, APC = −0.91%, p < 0.001); and ages 35–39 years (from 6.37 to 4.12, APC = −1.54%, p < 0.001)]. However, the absolute incidence amount still increased, especially in East Asia, South Aisa, and high-income North America (among 25–29, 30–34, and 35–39 years, especially in males; Supplementary Figures S1–S5). Recently, the overall death and DALY rates associated with AYA stomach cancer showed a declining trend. However, the number of deaths and DALYs increased among ages (20–24, 25–29, 30–34, and 35–39 years; both male and female) in South Asia from 1990 to 2019 (Supplementary Figures S1–S5).
In both sexes, the absolute numbers of stomach cancer incident cases and deaths, along with the age-standardized rates, increased commensurately as the age increased (Figures 1A–C). Stomach cancer was the major contributor to the AYA cancer burden among 30- to 39-year age groups (31). Consistent with the results of the previous studies, we found an accelerated increase in stomach cancer burden after age 30 for AYAs across all three measures.
Burden of AYA stomach cancer in 2019. Global age-specific counts and rates of incident cases (A), deaths (B), and DALYs (C) of AYA stomach cancers per 100,000 population by sex, 2019.
All regions experienced male-female incidence, death and DALY gap but the age-standardized incidence rates of AYA stomach cancer for men were lower than those in women in the high-income Asia Pacific, North Africa, and Middle East, South Asia, and Eastern sub-Saharan Africa (Figures 2A–C). The incidence, deaths, and DALYs for specific countries and territories are presented in Supplementary Table S6.
The age-standardized incidence (A), death (B), and DALY (C) rates of stomach cancer in 2019 for 21 GBD regions, by sex.
3.2. Regional variations in AYA stomach cancer
Different countries experienced varying degrees of AYA stomach cancer burden in 2019 (Figures 3A–C) and the associated percentage changes from 1990 to 2019 (Supplementary Figure S6). The highest age-standardized incidence rate occurred in East Asia (3.59 per 100,000 population) and high-income Asia Pacific region (2.88 per 100,000 population; Table 1), particularly in South Korea (3.90 per 100,000 population). China accounted for nearly half of the global incident cases [20,855 (17,648–24,441)] and contributed to 0.47 million (0.41–0.55) DALYs in 2019. Oceania (2.60) and Andean Latin America (2.51) had the subsequent highest age-standardized incidence rates. Three countries outside these high-incidence regions, Afghanistan (3.94), Mongolia (3.48), and Tajikistan (3.03), also had the highest age-standardized incidence rates. The lowest incidence rates were reported in Western sub-Saharan Africa, Australasia, and high-income North America (Table 1).
Burden of AYA cancers across 204 countries and territories in both sexes, 2019. Age-standardized rates of incidence (A), death (B), and DALY (C) of AYA stomach cancer.
In 2019, the number of incident cases of AYA stomach cancer increased from 47,932 (95% UI: 44,593–51,006) to 49,008 (45,008–53,078), an increase of 1,075 cases compared with that reported in 1990. The number of deaths declined from 35,679 (32,579–37,679) to 27,895 (25,711–30,240)-a decrease of 7,784 deaths. The number of DALYs decreased from 1,989,928 (1,839,469–2,123,565) to 1,573,896 (1,448,735–1,703,548)-a decrease of 416,032 DALYs. The highest increase in the number of incidence and decrease in the number of deaths both occurred in East Asia. From the 1990 to 2019, the number of incident cases increased from 18,729 (16,352–21,292) to almost 21,313 (18,107–24,881), but the number of deaths in East Asia decreased in the same period [14,355 (12,466–16,300) in 1990 to 8,749 (7,519–10,098) in 2019]. A major increase in the absolute number of deaths [5,190 (4,459–5,789) in 1990 to 6,981 (6,075–8,025) in 2019] occurred in South Asia with the second highest growth in the number of cases. The bulk of these increases was observed in India. Other regions that contributed significantly to the increased numbers of cases and deaths included central Latin America, North Africa and the Middle East, and Western sub-Saharan Africa (Figures 4A–C).
The absolute number of incident cases (A), deaths (B), and DALYs (C) due to AYA stomach cancer, 1990–2019, for 21 GBD regions.
Despite the increase in absolute numbers, the global age-standardized incidence and death rates of stomach cancer declined compared with those reported in 1990 (Figures 5A, B). Oceania had the highest age-standardized death rate (2.09), followed by Andean Latin America (1.81) and Central Asia (1.52). The East Asia region, which ranked first in the age-standardized incidence rate, had the fifth highest age-standardized death rate and the fourth highest DALY rate among all GBD regions in 2019. From 1990 to 2019, the incidence, death and DALY rates of AYA stomach cancer decreased in most regions worldwide. However, incidence rates increased in East Asia and high-income North America. The following countries with the highest age-standardized incidence rates also had the highest age-standardized death rates: Afghanistan (3.31), Mongolia (2.93), and Tajikistan (2.50). The lowest age-standardized death rates were reported in high-income North America and Australasia. During this period, the age-standardized incidence rate decreased by 30.90% worldwide. Meanwhile, the age-standardized death rate decreased by 46.77%, and age-standardized DALY declined by 46.43% (Table 1; Figures 5A–C). However, the downward tendency of age-standardized incidence rates did stabilize globally and in some regions during the last 5 years of the study period. At the global level and in many regions, the age-standardized incidence, mortality and DALY rates substantially reduced in women compared with that in men from 1990 to 2019 (Supplementary Figures S7A–C). The high-income Asia Pacific region had the sharpest drop in age-standardized rates between 1990 and 2019 compared with other regions (decrease in age-standardized incidence by 62.27%, age-standardized deaths by 77.25%, and age-standardized DALYs by 77.11%). In East Asia, the age-standardized incidence rate was not sharply reduced (14.7%) and we noticed a 26.55% increase in the age-standardized incidence rate in males (Supplementary Figure S7A). However, a 44.5% decline in age-standardized deaths leads the age-standardized DALY rate to reduce by nearly half (49.7%, Table 1).
Secular trends of age-standardized incidence (A), death (B), and DALY (C) rates of AYA stomach cancer, 1990–2019, globally, and for 21 GBD regions.
3.3. Association of AYA stomach cancer with risks and SDI
The percentage of age-standardized DALYs related to the consumption of a high-sodium diet, and the smoking rate in each region are displayed in Figure 6. Globally, 1.29% of age-standardized DALYs were caused by consumption of a high-sodium diet, which was moderately higher in men than in women (1.38% for men; and 1.20% for women). In Southern Latin America, this number was almost twice higher than that of other regions, with 24.41% of age-standardized DALYs being caused by consumption of a high-sodium diet. Globally, 0.57% of age-standardized DALYs were attributed to smoking in men. The highest percentage of age-standardized DALYs attributable to smoking among men was observed in Australasia (15.75%). In women, smoking does not account for a significant proportion of the global age-standardized DALYs. Again, Australasia (more than 1%) had the highest percentage of AYA stomach cancer age-standardized DALYs attributable to smoking among women.
Percentage of stomach cancer age-standardized DALYs attributable to high-sodium diet and smoking in 2019, globally, and for 21 GBD regions.
The age-standardized incidence rate of stomach cancer decreased as the SDI increased, and regional diversities of the expected incidence rates progressively magnified as the SDI increased. In contrast to the overall incidence rate of stomach cancer, although the age-standardized incidence rates of AYA stomach cancer decreased as the SDI increased in most regions, they grew in East Asia and high-income North America. But the age-standardized mortality and DALY rates of AYA stomach cancer (Supplementary Figure S8) declined as the SDI increased in all regions.
4. Discussion
Although stomach cancer is the main cause of mortality and morbidity in many regions worldwide, the age-standardized incidence and death rates have steadily declined in the previous years. However, the overall trend may mask the critical differences within each age group. The AYA stomach cancer age-standardized incidence and death rates declined slightly in some regions and even increased in East Asia and high-income North America.
Low and middle SDI locations experienced a considerable burden of AYA stomach cancer and more than 40% of these cases were reported in China. A steady decline in death and DALY for stomach cancer has been observed in China over the past several decades. But it is noteworthy that the incidence rate of AYA stomach cancer has still increased in East Asia (especially in China) and the same condition has also occurred in high-income North America.
The present study showed that age-standardized incidence rates did not necessarily follow the changes in age-standardized death and DALY rates; that is, the age-standardized death rates considerably reduced in many locations, while the age-standardized incidence rates did not. East Asia, particularly China, experienced increased age-standardized incidence rates throughout the study period, while the deaths and DALY rates significantly declined. The regional pattern of the AYA stomach cancer burden provides valuable information about its trends and correlates, but the pattern in each region varies greatly. For instance, the AYA stomach cancer incidence rate decreased in Canada but increased in the US. AYA stomach cancer contributes to the higher age-standardized DALY rate per 100,000 population in Portugal, Chile, Ecuador, Guatemala, Bolivia, Yemen, Zimbabwe, Solomon Islands and Mali than in other countries in the same regions. Mongolia, Tajikistan, and Afghanistan have much higher rates than their respective regions (Central Asia, North Africa and Middle East) in terms of age-standardized incidence, death, and DALY rates.
A favorable change in diet and a decrease in H. pylori infection rates during childhood may contribute to the decreasing stomach cancer rates in older adults. However, the reasons for the discrepant tendencies in younger people remain unclear. Because of the established relationship between H. pylori exposure and stomach cancer, changes in the infection patterns may contribute to the rising rates among younger people. Since early-life infection has been proven to increase the cancer risk (32) and some epidemiological data have demonstrated an association between H. pylori infection and increasing risk of stomach cancer among young people (33), the long-term decrease in the prevalence of H. pylori could have changed, or the age at infection could have been altered. There is also a possibility that cancers in younger adults may be caused by a new carcinogenic process not properly mediated by H. pylori in the gastric mucosa, which may have been unmasked by removing this infection (7). A subgroup of stomach cancer is associated with the Epstein-Barr virus (34), making it possible for these or other agents to play a more significant role in altering gastric microbial flora.
Salt consumption, which has been increasing among all age groups in the US, may also contribute to its occurrence (35). Obesity has been linked to the development of cardiac cancer, and however, it does not seem to increase the risk of non-cardia cancer (36). People have been exposed to hazardous industrial occupational materials during the period of rapid industrialization, especially in developing countries. Since these materials are considered carcinogens, an industrialized workplace environment may play a significant role in the development of stomach cancer at a younger age (37).
A lower incidence of stomach cancer was observed in AYAs with low SDI. In limited-resource settings, cancer incidence is likely to be underestimated owing to misdiagnoses, missed diagnoses, insufficient infrastructure, and weak cancer monitoring systems (38). Global variations in genetic predispositions, lifestyle changes, and environmental exposure may also cause this outcome. A combination of improved reporting and increased exposure to the risk factors may be responsible for the rising global cancer incidence over time. However, there is still a lack of clarity regarding the significance of the interactions between genetics, environment, and non-medical factors.
Given the lack of relevant data, it was difficult to determine the relative contribution of administrative difficulties and other factors to the rapid decline in AYA cancers in South Africa, facing many challenges during the 2000s (39). Monitoring the burden of AYA cancers in the future will reveal the results of the Rwandan Cancer Registry's revitalization in the 2010s (40). The data for Volume X of Cancer Incidence in Five Continents database were obtained from eight cancer registered sites representing only 2% of the total population in Africa. The data surveillance systems in low- and middle-income countries must be strengthened to complete the evaluations based on high-quality cancer data from registered population-based cancer cases.
Our study also has some limitations. Data from some regions were inadequate. We were unable to distinguish the cardia from non-cardia forms from all stomach cancer cases. One of the main reasons for the changing rates of stomach cancer is that non-cardia stomach cancer is predominantly associated with H. pylori infection (12). Globally, ~27% of patients with stomach cancers have cardiac tumors (41). The prevalence of cardiac cancer in the US is higher among non-Hispanic whites and is not significantly associated with socioeconomic status (42). There are several challenges in comparing populations and investigating the secular tendency of cardia and non-cardia tumors over time. Because the definition of cardia cancer has changed over time, some cardia tumors might have been classified as lower esophageal adenocarcinomas and vice versa (6). The stomach cancer burden directly caused by H. pylori infection has not yet been determined. The lack of data on other risk factors limited our analysis. In addition, details regarding the molecular subtypes of stomach tumors were not obtained. Third, although the GBD 2019 has been updated to include the direct extract rates for those aged 15–39 years, the age-standardized stomach cancer rates for AYA need to be calculated manually rather than extracted directly. Thus, this prevented the estimation of uncertainty intervals, which impeded the assessment of the quality and availability of the source information and statistical uncertainty.
5. Conclusion
In this study, AYA stomach cancer appeared to have led to a serious global cancer burden. The overall trend may mask the critical differences among different countries within each age group. Hence, fine-grained analyses should be conducted at the local level to determine the local problems and effective public health policies. Increasing investment in AYA cancer prevention will facilitate equitable access to care and improve the population health in low-income and middle-income countries and worldwide, which will further reduce the number of AYA stomach cancer incident cases and deaths and benefit the younger generation.
Data availability statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://ghdx.healthdata.org.
Author contributions
Design and analysis: ZZ and JW. Writing—review and editing: ZZ, NS, LS, JW, and JD. Visualization and funding acquisition: ZZ. Supervision: JD. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82002020).
We thank the collaborators of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2019 for their excellent work.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1079248/full#supplementary-material
ReferencesVan CutsemESagaertXTopalBHaustermansKPrenenH. Gastric cancer. Lancet. (2016) 388:2654–64. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30354-327156933KarimiPIslamiFAnandasabapathySFreedmanNDKamangarF. Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2014) 23:700–13. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-105724618998LuoGZhangYGuoPWangLHuangYLiK. Global patterns and trends in stomach cancer incidence: age, period and birth cohort analysis. Int J Cancer. (2017) 141:1333–44. 10.1002/ijc.3083528614909HerreraVParsonnetJ. Helicobacter pylori and gastric adenocarcinoma. Clin Microbiol Infect. (2009) 15:971–6. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03031.x19874380RothenbacherDBodeGBergGKnayerUGonserTAdlerG. Helicobacter pylori among preschool children and their parents: evidence of parent-child transmission. J Infect Dis. (1999) 179:398–402. 10.1086/3145959878024de MartelCFormanDPlummerM. Gastric cancer: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. (2013) 42:219–40. 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.01.00323639638BlaserMJFalkowS. What are the consequences of the disappearing human microbiota?Nat Rev Microbiol. (2009) 7:887–94. 10.1038/nrmicro224519898491SiegelRLMillerKDFuchsHEJemalA. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. (2022) 72:7–33. 10.3322/caac.2170835020204MatsudaTAjikiWMarugameTIokaATsukumaHSobueT. Population-based survival of cancer patients diagnosed between 1993 and 1999 in Japan: a chronological and international comparative study. Jpn J Clin Oncol. (2011) 41:40–51. 10.1093/jjco/hyq16720819833HongSWonYJParkYRJungKWKongHJLeeES. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2017. Cancer Res Treat. (2020) 52:335–50. 10.4143/crt.2020.20632178489IsobeYNashimotoAAkazawaKOdaIHayashiKMiyashiroI. Gastric cancer treatment in Japan: 2008 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer. (2011) 14:301–16. 10.1007/s10120-011-0085-621894577AndersonWFRabkinCSTurnerNFraumeniJFJrRosenbergPSCamargoMC. The changing face of noncardia gastric cancer incidence among US non-hispanic whites. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2018) 110:608–15. 10.1093/jnci/djx26229361173AndersonWFCamargoMCFraumeniJFJrCorreaPRosenbergPSRabkinCS. Age-specific trends in incidence of noncardia gastric cancer in US adults. JAMA. (2010) 303:1723–8. 10.1001/jama.2010.49620442388ChungHWNohSHLimJB. Analysis of demographic characteristics in 3242 young age gastric cancer patients in Korea. World J Gastroenterol. (2010) 16:256–63. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i2.25620066747MunDGBhinJKimSKimHJungJHJungY. Proteogenomic characterization of human early-onset gastric cancer. Cancer Cell. (2019) 35:111–24.e10. 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.12.00330645970ZouJQinWYangLWangLWangYShenJ. Genetic alterations and expression characteristics of ARID1A impact tumor immune contexture and survival in early-onset gastric cancer. Am J Cancer Res. (2020) 10:3947–72.33294279BautistaMCJiangSFArmstrongMAPostlethwaiteDLiD. Impact of age on clinicopathological features and survival of patients with noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma. J Gastric Cancer. (2014) 14:238–45. 10.5230/jgc.2014.14.4.23825580355StrongVERussoAYoonSSBrennanMFCoitDGZhengCH. Comparison of young patients with gastric cancer in the United States and China. Ann Surg Oncol. (2017) 24:3964–71. 10.1245/s10434-017-6073-229052085GBD2017 Stomach Cancer Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of stomach cancer in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2020) 5:42–54. 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30328-031648970QinYTongXFanJLiuZZhaoRZhangT. Global burden and trends in incidence, mortality, and disability of stomach cancer from 1990 to 2017. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. (2021) 12:e00406. 10.14309/ctg.000000000000040634608884MagrathIEpelmanS. Cancer in adolescents and young adults in countries with limited resources. Curr Oncol Rep. (2013) 15:332–46. 10.1007/s11912-013-0327-323832788GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. (2020) 396:1204–22. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-933069326Global Burden of Disease Cancer CollaborationFitzmauriceCAkinyemijuTFAl LamiFHAlamTAlizadeh-NavaeiR. Global regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. (2018) 4:1553–68. 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.156829860482GBD2019 Demographics Collaborators. Global age-sex-specific fertility, mortality, healthy life expectancy (HALE), and population estimates in 204 countries and territories, 1950-2019: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. (2020) 396:1160–203. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30977-633069325GBD2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. (2020) 396:1223–49. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-233069327VollsetSEGorenEYuanCWCaoJSmithAEHsiaoT. Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. (2020) 396:1285–306. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30677-232679112GBD 2019 Universal Health Coverage Collaborators. Measuring universal health coverage based on an index of effective coverage of health services in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. (2020) 396:1250–84. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30750-932861314CocciaPF. Overview of adolescent and young adult oncology. J Oncol Pract. (2019) 15:235–7. 10.1200/JOP.19.0007536591634BoylePParkinDM. Cancer registration: principles and methods. Statistical methods for registries. IARC Sci Publ. (1991) 95:126–58.1894318PaikJMHenryLDe AvilaLYounossiERacilaAYounossiZM. Mortality related to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is increasing in the United States. Hepatol Commun. (2019) 3:1459–71. 10.1002/hep4.141931701070WenYFChenMXYinGLinRZhongYJDongQQ. The global, regional, and national burden of cancer among adolescents and young adults in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a population-based study. J Hematol Oncol. (2021) 14:89. 10.1186/s13045-021-01093-334108026BlaserMJNomuraALeeJStemmermanGNPerez-PerezGI. Early-life family structure and microbially induced cancer risk. PLoS Med. (2007) 4:e7. 10.1371/journal.pmed.004000717227131MasudaGTokunagaAShirakawaTTogashiAKiyamaTKatoS. Helicobacter pylori infection, but not genetic polymorphism of CYP2E1, is highly prevalent in gastric cancer patients younger than 40 years. Gastric Cancer. (2007) 10:98–103. 10.1007/s10120-007-0414-y17577619MurphyGPfeifferRCamargoMCRabkinCS. Meta-analysis shows that prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus-positive gastric cancer differs based on sex and anatomic location. Gastroenterology. (2009) 137:824–33. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.05.00119445939BriefelRRJohnsonCL. Secular trends in dietary intake in the United States. Annu Rev Nutr. (2004) 24:401–31. 10.1146/annurev.nutr.23.011702.07334915189126AbnetCCFreedmanNDHollenbeckARFraumeniJFJr., Leitzmann M, Schatzkin A. A prospective study of BMI and risk of oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer. (2008) 44:465–71. 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.12.00918221867ChungHWParkSWChungJBKangJKKimJWKimHS. Differences in genetic expression profiles between young-age and old-age gastric adenocarcinoma using cDNA microarray for endocrine disruptor study. Oncol Rep. (2004) 12:33–9. 10.3892/or.12.1.3315201955Morhason-BelloIOOdedinaFRebbeckTRHarfordJDangouJMDennyL. Challenges and opportunities in cancer control in Africa: a perspective from the African Organisation for Research and Training in Cancer. Lancet Oncol. (2013) 14:e142–51. 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70482-523561745SinghERuffPBabbCSengayiMBeeryMKhoaliL. Establishment of a cancer surveillance programme: the South African experience. Lancet Oncol. (2015) 16:e414–21. 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00162-X26248849KielkowskiDSinghEWilsonKBabbCUrbanMKellettP. The South African paediatric tumour registry - 25 years of activity. S Afr Med J. (2012) 102:642. 10.7196/SAMJ.611322831929ColquhounAArnoldMFerlayJGoodmanKJFormanDSoerjomataramI. Global patterns of cardia and non-cardia gastric cancer incidence in 2012. Gut. (2015) 64:1881–8. 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-30891525748648GuptaSTaoLMurphyJDCamargoMCOrenEValasekMA. Race/ethnicity-, socioeconomic status-, and anatomic subsite-specific risks for gastric cancer. Gastroenterology. (2019) 156:59–62.ae4. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.04530267713