<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Public Health</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Public Health</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Public Health</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-2565</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpubh.2022.882009</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Public Health</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>How Media Use Influences the Fertility Intentions Among Chinese Women of Reproductive Age: A Perspective of Social Trust</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ning</surname> <given-names>Chuanlin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1602592/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Jing</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1534313/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Yijie</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1785670/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Nan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1785506/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Pei</surname> <given-names>Huacheng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Hao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1160211/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>School of Media and Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana</institution>, <addr-line>Ljubljana</addr-line>, <country>Slovenia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>School of Economics and Finance, Shanghai International Studies University</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>School of Journalism and Communication, Nanjing Normal University</institution>, <addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Mihajlo Jakovljevic, Hosei University, Japan</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Jinghong Xu, Beijing Normal University, China; Chao Min, Nanjing University, China</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x0002A;Correspondence: Hao Gao <email>zhubenhaozi&#x00040;163.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><p>This article was submitted to Health Economics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>10</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>882009</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>23</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>19</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2022 Ning, Wu, Ye, Yang, Pei and Gao.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Ning, Wu, Ye, Yang, Pei and Gao</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license> </permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Background</title>
<p>The low fertility level has become a serious social problem in China. Previous research has argued the significant influence of media use and social trust on fertility intentions, but the interaction between the two variables and how they influence fertility intentions remain further investigation. This study explored the influence mechanism of media use on Chinese women&#x00027;s fertility intentions from the perspective of social trust.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>This study collected data from the 2017 China General Social Survey, investigated the relationships between variables through bivariate correlation coefficients, and explored the differences in fertility intentions among women of reproductive age (20&#x02013;49). Also, this paper examined the influence of media use and social trust by regression analysis and tested the mediating role of social trust between media use and fertility intentions with Bootstrap sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Women with different media use preferences, education levels, and family incomes have significant differences (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01) in fertility intentions. New media use negatively influences women&#x00027;s fertility intentions, while traditional media use has no significant influence on women&#x00027;s fertility intentions. Social trust significantly influenced women&#x00027;s fertility intentions and partially mediated the impact of new media use on fertility intentions.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Online communication influences fertility intentions among Chinese women of reproductive age. It tends to influence their social trust by amplifying negative social news, affecting their fertility intentions further. This paper suggests the importance of strengthening social trust and online agenda-setting to improve women&#x00027;s fertility intentions that strategic information communication can change their perceptions of social trust.</p>
</sec></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>media use</kwd>
<kwd>fertility intentions</kwd>
<kwd>social trust</kwd>
<kwd>Chinese reproductive-aged women</kwd>
<kwd>social media</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Social Science Fund of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100012456</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="7"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="88"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="9090"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Fertility is the driving force behind human development, and low fertility has become an important global issue, impacting the global society, economy, finance, and national security (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>). The fertility rates in China have declined dramatically over the past few decades, and the annual total fertility rate only reached 1.65% from 2006 to 2019 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). The low level of fertility caused a decreasing birth rate year by year. Mainland China&#x00027;s birth rate dropped to a record low of 7.52&#x02030; in 2021 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>), which poses a huge challenge to China&#x00027;s demographic structure and social development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>). With the development of the social economy, the low fertility rate is no longer primarily driven by fertility policies but rather reflects the low fertility intentions in the current socio-economic context (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>). In 2001, Bongaarts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>) proposed a model to explain the relationship between fertility intentions and fertility levels. Many studies have shown the correlation between fertility intentions and fertility rates from multiple perspectives (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). Among the factors influencing fertility rates, scholars identified low fertility intentions as an important cause of low fertility rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>). They believed that fertility intentions could predict fertility rates, and the result is more accurate in the short term (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>).</p>
<p>Studies have examined that media information is an important factor influencing fertility intentions. In addition to providing fertility-related health knowledge and policy propaganda to the public (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>), the media information can influence fertility intentions through moderating or mediating variables such as social role perceptions and gender attitudes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). In the mediated society constructed by traditional and new media, people gain diverse types of information, and new media platforms provide space for people to read, discuss and express (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). Topics like fertility policies, marriage and fertility values, which were rarely mentioned in the traditional media era, can be discussed on social media.</p>
<p>Social trust refers to an individual&#x00027;s belief about the general trustworthiness of others, and it is a part of an individual&#x00027;s worldview (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>). Social trust plays a mediating role and thus influences people&#x00027;s certain behaviors in the complex-mediated environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>). Studies have also examined that social trust is a significant factor in improving fertility intentions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>), thus influencing people&#x00027;s fertility behaviors. The influence mechanism needs further explanation in the mediated environment. In detail, whether media use can affect fertility intentions through social trust. If so, what role social trust plays in the mechanism.</p>
<p>Within the traditional Chinese culture, women were disadvantaged in their fertility choices, and childbirth is always necessary for common myths (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>). Due to the patriarchal ideology, some women would not stop childbirth until they have a boy under the family and social pressures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). Studies described women&#x00027;s fertility intentions under traditional Chinese fertility culture as &#x02018;passive following&#x00027;, which is full of compromise (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>). As society has progressed, women have access to higher education and earn higher social status. Chinese women have also gained more social roles and gradually broken free from the shackles that bind them to fertility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>). With the change in women&#x00027;s roles and attitudes in modern fertility discourse, women&#x00027;s fertility intentions deserve further attention.</p>
<p>On this basis, this study collected data from the 2017 Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS 2017), targeting women aged 20 to 49, to explore the influence of media use on fertility intentions among Chinese women and the role of social trust in the relationship between the two variables. Compared to previous research, the main contributions of this study are: (1) Scholars have explored the factors influencing women&#x00027;s fertility intentions from a socio-economic perspective. This study examined the influence of media on women&#x00027;s fertility intentions from the perspective of the mediated society. (2) Few studies based on the media perspective focused on Internet use, neglecting that the media environment is constructed with traditional and new media. The &#x00027;media use&#x00027; in this study contains traditional media use, enhancing the understanding of the influence of diverse media types on women&#x00027;s fertility intentions. (3) Liu&#x00027;s research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>) selected gender attitudes as a mediating variable to investigate the influence of Internet use frequency on women&#x00027;s fertility intentions. Different from their views, this study considered social trust as an important factor in forming and influencing women&#x00027;s fertility intentions and expanded the knowledge of the social trust mechanism in media research.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>Literature Review</title>
<sec>
<title>Fertility Intentions of Women and the Influencing Factors</title>
<p>As a part of fertility decisions, fertility intention is a key indicator of measuring fertility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>). Fertility intentions can be defined from fertility desires, attitudes, and behaviors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>). Regarding fertility desires, fertility intentions include the desired number of children, the desired gender of children, and the interpregnancy interval (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>). Biologically, women are the ultimate bearers of childbirth. Women&#x00027;s fertility intentions decline more than men&#x00027;s intentions to have children as they get aging (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>), which further directly affects fertility behaviors and thus fertility rates. Furthermore, scholars argued that female empowerment is an important reason causing the decline in female fertility intentions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>). Individualism, feminism, gender equality, and changes in marriage and family values also contributed to low fertility rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). Thus, women&#x00027;s fertility intentions become essential in a low-fertility environment. Regarding the CGSS data, this paper conceptualized fertility intentions as the desired number of children among reproductive-aged women.</p>
<p>The factors influencing women&#x00027;s fertility intentions are mainly related to the macro socio-economic and micro individual characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>). In China, the role of individual fertility intentions in determining their fertility behaviors has become increasingly prominent with the gradual relaxation of fertility policies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>). Many studies have examined the social status of women (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>), gender role attitudes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>), education levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>), family income (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>), housing situation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>), cultural beliefs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>), and social security system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>) have significant influences on fertility intentions of women.</p>
<p>Combined with the relevant variables from the previous studies and the CGSS, this study determined education levels, family income, housing situation, and social status as control variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Media Use and the Fertility Intentions of Women</title>
<p>In addition to traditional social, family, and individual factors, media as an important part of the social system has driven researchers&#x00027; attention to exploring its impact on women&#x00027;s fertility. In terms of traditional media use, an Indian study showed that the official monopoly media, DoorDarshan India, significantly reduced women&#x00027;s fertility intentions through strong discussion about family planning and contraceptive use (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). In Indonesia, the expansion of private broadcast television and the growth of its subscribers have caused a low fertility rate as private television reinforced the promotion of modern contraceptives (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>). Another study argued that media more likely influence fertility intentions of women with long-term media exposure. These women are more inclined to use contraception to reduce fertility possibilities and control the family size (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>). Information and communication technology has rapidly developed since the 1990s, and new media based on the internet has been a vital factor in social change and an important trans-formative force in reconfiguring individual behaviors. Researchers began to focus on the impact of new media on women&#x00027;s fertility intentions. A study on Chinese women&#x00027;s fertility intentions indicated that attention to news on new media negatively correlated with women&#x00027;s fertility intentions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). Cheng (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>) found that social networks play an important role in spreading knowledge about contraception, reducing women&#x00027;s fertility intentions. Adair et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>) shared a finding based on content analysis of tweets that most people had a negative attitude to parenting, and single people who released the relevant content also had low fertility intentions.</p>
<p>In this regard, we proposed the following hypotheses:</p>
<p>H1: Media use negatively correlates with fertility intentions among Chinese women.</p>
<p>H1-1: Chinese women of reproductive age have lower fertility intentions when having more frequent traditional use.</p>
<p>H1-2: Chinese women of reproductive age have lower fertility intentions when having more frequent new media use.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Social Trust, Media Use, and the Fertility Intention of Women</title>
<p>Studies on the impact of media use on women&#x00027;s fertility intentions found that media act in conjunction with other variables to influence fertility intentions. An experimental study from the United States indicated that media increased the willingness of non-student, unmarried, childless women to have children by reinforcing the portrayal of women&#x00027;s social roles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>). Liu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>) believed that Chinese women have lower identification with Chinese traditional gender roles as the increase of their internet use, which further reduces their fertility intentions. Billari et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>) revealed a finding from German panel data that the internet can effectively mitigate work-family conflict by increasing the likelihood of remote working, which positively influences women&#x00027;s fertility intentions. Another research argued that social support from Facebook could reduce the abortion rate and thus increase fertility rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>). The above studies have proven that media use can change the social roles of women and the perceptions of traditional gender roles and provide social support for women, further influencing the fertility intentions of women. The studies from different perspectives all emphasized the correlation between social factors and women&#x00027;s fertility intentions and the influence of media use on social factors.</p>
<p>Empirical research found that trust affects attitudes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>) and causes individual and social behavior outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>). Some scholars used social trust as a variable to explore its influence on fertility intentions and illustrated that trust is more important for fertility in countries with high trust and women with high education levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>). A high-trust society is helpful for work-family balance, mainly achieved by the stability of key institutions and generous welfare support, thereby increasing fertility intentions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>). A study used panel data from 24 OECD countries during 1980&#x02013;2004 and found that enhanced social trust can increase fertility rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>). Thus, in a mediated society, whether media communication can influence social trust and further affect people&#x00027;s attitudes and intentions toward fertility desires a further exploration.</p>
<p>Early research on mass media and social trust suggested that mass media use has a certain impact on social trust. For example, a study with 1996 United States elections data indicated that the use of newspapers and television affects social trust (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">51</xref>). Another penal data research illustrated that mass media use affects social trust next year (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">52</xref>). With the advent of social media based on internet technology, scholars have found that social media influences social trust, but their findings are different. Some of them believed that social media use has more controllability of information that people can weed out mistrustful relations early and reduce the uncertainty (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">53</xref>). Also, local social media use can enhance interpersonal trust (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">54</xref>). A random sampling survey on US residents showed that people cultivate and build trusted relations through online interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">55</xref>). Another survey on university students in Texas, USA, revealed a positive correlation between the intensity of Facebook use and social trust among university students (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>). In contrast, Putnam (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>) argued that the role of the internet in building trust is time-consuming, thus preventing face-to-face communication and limiting interaction with familiar people. Rheingold (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">57</xref>) also supported that fake identity online may lure vulnerable individuals into harmful relationships. In addition, researchers argued that the use of different media or different media use behaviors also has distinctions. Reading newspapers and watching entertainment content from television can enhance social trust while watching television news will weaken social trust (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">51</xref>). The internet positively impacts social trust when people use it for information exchange. Still, the internet negatively correlates with social trust when using it for social entertainment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">58</xref>).</p>
<p>Existing research has proved the influence of media use and social trust on fertility intentions and the impact of media use on social trust. However, the exact influence mechanisms are undetermined. Whether social trust plays a role in media use influencing fertility intentions needs further exploration. This study proposed the following hypotheses (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref> for full hypothesized model):</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Hypothesized model.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpubh-10-882009-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>H2: Social trust mediates the relationship between media use and fertility intentions among women of reproductive age.</p>
<p>H2-1: Media use among women of reproductive age positively correlates with social trust.</p>
<p>H2-2: Social trust among women of reproductive age positively correlates with fertility intentions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods" id="s3">
<title>Methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Study Design</title>
<p>This study explored the influence of media use and social trust on women&#x00027;s fertility intentions. First, we conducted descriptive statistics of media use, social trust, and fertility intentions of reproductive-aged women. Then, we used ANOVA to test whether there was a difference in fertility intentions of reproductive-aged women under different demographic variables. Furthermore, we utilized bivariate correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis to test the influencing relationships between the variables. Finally, we explored the influence of social trust on fertility intentions through a mediating effect model.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Data Sources</title>
<p>CGSS is one of the authoritative academic survey projects in China and is widely used in Chinese social studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">59</xref>). National Survey Research Center at Renmin University of China (NSRC) is responsible for conducting the project, selecting samples through stratified random sampling and stratified-stage sampling. Participants in the projects are residents from 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, excluding the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the Macau Special Administrative Region, and Taiwan. The latest CGSS data is updated to 2017 and includes a valid nationally representative sample of 14,670. Although the family planning regulations of China explain that the reproductive age of women is 15&#x02013;49 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">60</xref>), considering the legal age of marriage for women in China is 20 years old, this study selected data related to women aged 20&#x02013;49. After deleting data with missing values and outliers, we obtained a valid sample of 2,649. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> shows the sociodemographic information of selected samples.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Sociodemographic information of the samples.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>n</italic> (%) or Mean &#x000B1;SD</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age (year)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.493 &#x000B1; 8.657</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Education level</bold></td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Uneducated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">152 (5.74)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Primary school</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">466 (17.59)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Middle school</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">743 (28.05)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">High school/technical secondary school</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">467 (17.63)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Junior college</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">326 (12.31)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bachelor&#x00027;s degree</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">429 (16.19)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Master&#x00027;s degree and above</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66 (2.49)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Housing situation</bold></td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Owner-occupied</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">801 (30.2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Non-owner-occupied</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,848 (69.8)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fertility intentions</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.851 &#x000B1; 0.732</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Family income</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97,500.178 &#x000B1; 146,573.099</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Social trust</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.328 &#x000B1; 1.043</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Social status</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.311 &#x000B1; 1.623</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Traditional media use</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.148 &#x000B1; 0.632</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">New media use</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.897 &#x000B1; 1.104</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Variables Selection</title>
<sec>
<title>Dependent Variable</title>
<sec>
<title>Fertility Intentions</title>
<p>For fertility intentions studies, the American scholar George Gallup (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">61</xref>) introduced the concept of ideal family size for the first time. He used the question &#x0201C;what do you think is the ideal number of children for the average American family?&#x0201D; for the measurement, which has been widely used to measure people&#x00027;s intentions to have children since then (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">61</xref>). The question contained in CGSS2017, &#x0201C;how many children would you like to have if there were no policy restrictions&#x0201D; is consistent with the previous survey question measuring fertility intentions. Furthermore, scholars also used the same question to investigate fertility intentions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). Thus, this study selected the data of this survey question to examine fertility intentions. Zero means that the respondent has no intentions to have children, and the higher value represents higher fertility intentions. Also, we standardized the data on fertility intentions of a 5-point Likert scale to maintain statistical consistency.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Independent Variable</title>
<sec>
<title>Media Use</title>
<p>Media use is defined as &#x0201C;the extent to which an audience is exposed to a particular message or media content&#x0201D; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">62</xref>). This study divided media use into traditional media use (newspapers, magazines, radio, television) and new media use (Internet and customized mobile news). CGSS asked the participants to answer their media use in the past year, measuring a Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always). Besides, this study added the variable of media preference to compare the differences between traditional and new media use. We coded the situation that new media use is more than traditional media use as 1, representing the new media preference; new media use is less than traditional media use as 2, representing the traditional media preference; new media use equals traditional media use as 3, representing no media preference.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Social Trust</title>
<p>Social trust refers to shared expectations of each other, usually expressed as beliefs; that is, people behave wisely and mutually beneficial, when necessary, in their interactions with others. The shared expectations generate strong and stable relationships between people (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">63</xref>). This study chose the question, &#x0201C;Generally, do you agree that most people in the society can be trusted?&#x0201D; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">64</xref>), as the indicator of social trust, responses ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) with a five-point Likert scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Control Variables</title>
<p>The literature shows that education levels, family incomes, housing situation, and social status can influence women&#x00027;s fertility intentions, so this study viewed them as control variables. Specifically, the education level was selected from the question &#x0201C;What is your highest education?&#x0201D;; family income was assessed from annual household income, and the selected question is &#x0201C;What was your annual household income in 2016?&#x0201D;; housing situation was derived from the item &#x0201C;Do you own (including jointly with others) any property currently?&#x0201D;; social status refers to the question &#x0201C;In general, which social level are you at?&#x0201D;, ranging from 1 (the lowest level) to 10 (the highest level). This study coded the relevant variables to ensure statistical consistency: education levels (without education = 0 to postgraduate and above = 6), housing situation (owner-occupied = 1, non-owner-occupied = 0), family income was measured into different household income levels based on the average annual household income (low family income = 1, high family income = 2); social status was divided into three groups (values 1&#x02013;3 were defined as low social status = 1, values 4&#x02013;7 were middle social status = 2, and values 8&#x02013;10 were high social status = 3).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s4">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Descriptive Statistical Analysis</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> provides a statistical description of media use, social trust, and fertility intentions of reproductive-aged women. In terms of media use, the frequency of new media use (M = 2.897) is higher than traditional media use (M = 2.148). Besides, social trust is relatively high (M = 3.328). The overall fertility intentions of reproductive-aged women are low (M = 1.851).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Descriptive analysis.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Variables</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mean</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Standard deviation</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Traditional media use</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.148</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.632</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">New media use</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.897</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.104</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Social trust</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.328</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.043</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fertility intentions</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.851</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.732</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref> compares the differences in fertility intentions of reproductive-aged women from the perspectives of media use preference, education levels, annual family income, social status, and social trust. The variance results show that women with different media use preferences, education levels, and family incomes have significant differences (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01) in fertility intentions. However, there are no significant differences in fertility intentions between reproductive-aged women with different housing situations, social status, and social trust.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Differences in fertility intentions of reproductive-aged women from the different variables.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Variables</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Groups</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Fertility intentions (M&#x000B1;SD)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>F</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>p</italic></bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Education levels</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Low (<italic>n</italic> = 1,828)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.90 &#x000B1; 0.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.968</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.000&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">High (<italic>n</italic> = 821)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.75 &#x000B1; 0.74</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Family income</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Low (<italic>n</italic> = 1,761)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.89 &#x000B1; 0.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.401</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.000&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">High (<italic>n</italic> = 888)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.77 &#x000B1; 0.74</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Media use preference</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">New media (<italic>n</italic> = 1,895)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.82 &#x000B1; 0.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.591</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.000&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Traditional media (<italic>n</italic> = 571)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.96 &#x000B1; 0.69</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Housing situation</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">No preference (<italic>n</italic> = 183)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.83 &#x000B1; 0.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.639</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.201</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Non-owner-occupied (<italic>n</italic> = 1,848)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.84 &#x000B1; 0.70</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Owner-occupied (<italic>n</italic> = 801)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.88 &#x000B1; 0.80</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Social status</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Low (<italic>n</italic> = 767)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.80 &#x000B1; 0.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.679</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.069</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Middle (<italic>n</italic> = 1,823)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.87 &#x000B1; 0.73</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">High (<italic>n</italic> = 59)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.93 &#x000B1; 0.85</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Social trust</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Low (<italic>n</italic> = 724)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.82 &#x000B1; 0.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.803</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.165</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Middle (<italic>n</italic> = 365)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.81 &#x000B1; 0.72</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">High (<italic>n</italic> = 1,560)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.87 &#x000B1; 0.72</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;p &#x0003C; 0.01</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Preliminary Analyses</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref> shows the correlations coefficients of the variables in this study, and social status (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) and social trust (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) are positively correlated with fertility intentions. Combined with the ANOVA results, women with higher social trust have the most significant fertility intentions (M = 1.87 &#x000B1; 0.72). Education levels (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01), family income (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01), new media use (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01) are negatively correlated with fertility intentions. The results show that groups with high education level (M = 1.75 &#x000B1; 0.74), high annual family income (M = 1.77 &#x000B1; 0.74), and new media preference (M = 1.82 &#x000B1; 0.75) have lower fertility intentions.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p>Bivariate correlation between the variables.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>1</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>2</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>3</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>4</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>5</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>6</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>7</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>8</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">1. Fertility intentions</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">2. Education levels</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.140&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">3. Family income</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.088&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.526&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.Social status</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.046&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.275&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.353&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">5. Housing situation (owner-occupied)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.025</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.087&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.066&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">6. Traditional media use</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.341&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.262&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.198&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.054&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">7. New media use</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.107&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.522&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.408&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.205&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.038&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.350&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">8. Social trust</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.040&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.075&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.035</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.076&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.044&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.008</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>&#x0002A;p &#x0003C; 0.05. &#x0002A;&#x0002A;p &#x0003C; 0.01</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>This study conducted a hierarchical multiple regression analysis to investigate further the factors influencing women&#x00027;s fertility intentions. First, we used education levels, housing situation, social status, and annual family income as control variables for regression analysis with fertility intentions, forming Model 1. Then, we added media (traditional and new media) use and social trust based on the control variables to regress with fertility intentions, forming Model 2. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>, Model 1 indicates that education levels and annual family income negatively influence fertility intentions of reproductive-aged women, and social status positively influences fertility intentions. Model 2, with adding key variables, presents that under the control variables of education levels and social status, preference for new media use negatively affects fertility intentions of reproductive-aged women (B = &#x02212;0.033, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05), and social trust positively affect fertility intentions (B = 0.030, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05). Regarding the correlation between traditional media use and fertility intentions is not significant, Hypothesis 1 is partially supported. In detail, H1-1 is not supported, and H1-2 is supported. Besides, H2-2 is also supported.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption><p>Results of hierarchical multiple regression analysis (<italic>n</italic> = 2,649).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="5" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Model 1</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="5" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Model 2</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>B</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SE</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>t</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>p</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x003B2;</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>B</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SE</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>t</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>p</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x003B2;</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Constants</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.028&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.080</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.930&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.097</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Education levels</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.066&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.011</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;6.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.061&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;5.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Housing situation (owner-occupied)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.033</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.031</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.063</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.288</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.021</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.027</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.031</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.864</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.388</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.017</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Social status</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.046&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.009</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.921</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.102</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.044&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.009</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.739</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.098</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annual family income</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.009&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.004</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.028</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.010</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.004</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.069</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Traditional media use</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.025</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.024</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.026</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.305</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.022</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">New media use</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.033&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.015</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.035</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Social trust</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.030&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.014</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.221</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.026</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.043</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">R<sup>2</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">0.029</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">0.033</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Adjusted R<sup>2</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">0.028</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">0.031</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">F value</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">F (4.2644) = 20.057, <italic>p</italic> = 0.000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">F (7.2641) = 12.952, <italic>p</italic> = 0.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x00394;R<sup>2</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">0.029</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">0.004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x00394;F value</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">F (4.2644) = 20.057, <italic>p</italic> = 0.000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">F (3.2641) = 3.406, <italic>p</italic> = 0.017</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Dependent variable: fertility intentions</italic>.</p>
<p><italic>&#x0002A;p &#x0003C; 0.05 <sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup> p &#x0003C; 0.01</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Testing for Mediation Effect</title>
<p>This study used social trust as the mediating variable to further investigate the influence of media use and social trust on women&#x00027;s fertility intentions, exploring the possible influencing mechanism. This study employed the hierarchical regression analysis to test the mediating effect. First, we took education levels, housing situation, social status, and annual family income as the control variables and added media use (traditional and new media) on this basis to regress with fertility intentions, forming Model 3. Then, we added media (traditional and new media) use based on the four control variables to regress with social trust, forming Model 4. Model 2 (seen as <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>), Model 3, and Model 4 (seen as <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>) showed that new media is positively correlated with social media (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01), while traditional media use is not significantly correlated with social trust. Thus, H2-1 is partially supported.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption><p>Results of mediating effect analysis (<italic>n</italic> = 2,649).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="5" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Model 1</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="5" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Model 2</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>B</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SE</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>t</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>p</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x003B2;</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>B</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SE</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>t</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>p</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x003B2;</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Constant</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.024&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.087</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.213</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.145&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.126</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.055</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Education levels</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.059&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;5.029</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.125</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.057&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.017</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.351</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.084</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Housing situation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.027</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.031</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.876</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.381</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.017</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.013</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.044</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.299</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.765</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.006</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Social status</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.046&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.009</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.876</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.101</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.041&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.013</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.062</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.064</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annual family income</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.008</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.004</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.848</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.065</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.044</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.005</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.006</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.447</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.018</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Traditional media use</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.026</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.024</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.076</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.282</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.023</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.041</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.035</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.161</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.246</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.025</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">New media use</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.034&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.015</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2.204</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.028</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.052</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.047&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.022</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2.112</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.035</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dependent variable</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">Fertility intentions</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">Social trust</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">R<sup>2</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">0.031</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">0.011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Adjusted R<sup>2</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">0.029</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">0.009</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">F (6.2642) = 14.267, <italic>p</italic> = 0.000</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="5">F (6.2642) = 5.015, <italic>p</italic> = 0.000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>&#x0002A;p &#x0003C; 0.05 &#x0002A;&#x0002A;p &#x0003C; 0.01</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>For the issue of small values in the Model 1-4, R<sup>2</sup> is a descriptive variable in most situations but not a test variable (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">65</xref>). Besides, the significant <italic>p-</italic>value and cons value still can fit better explanatory variable relationships even with a relatively low R<sup>2</sup> value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">66</xref>). R<sup>2</sup> is a less fundamental statistic than regression slope, and it may change in response to variance changes in the independent variables despite the absence of structural differences across the population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">67</xref>).</p>
<p>This study utilized the product of the coefficients method to examine the results of mediating effects. The product of the coefficients method has been widely used for its statistical efficacy over the causal step method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">68</xref>). The product of the coefficients method contains two types. One is the Sobel test based on a normal sampling distribution with mediating effects. The other is asymmetric confidence interval based on a non-normal sampling distribution with mediating effects, including Bootstrap and product distribution. A simulation study by Mackinnon et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">69</xref>) found that Bootstrap had the highest statistical efficacy in mediating effects analysis. Thus, this study used Bootstrap sampling for testing significance. In this study, a denotes the regression coefficient of media use to social trust; b represents the regression coefficient of social trust to fertility intentions; c represents the regression coefficient of media use to fertility intentions (without mediator), which is the total effect; and c&#x00027; represents the regression coefficient of media use to fertility intentions (with a mediator), which is the direct effect. According to the procedure, the bootstrap sampling test for mediating effect was strictly processed. If a and b are significant, and c&#x00027; is significant, and a<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>b is synonymous with c,&#x00027; it is partially mediated. Suppose at least one of a and b is not significant, and the 95% confidence interval (BootCI) for a<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>b includes 0. In that case, the mediating effect is insignificant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">70</xref>).</p>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">Table 7</xref> tells that a, b and c&#x00027; are significant in Model 4, and a<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>b is synonymous with c&#x00027;, suggesting a mediating effect. Social media plays a mediating role in the relationship between new media use and fertility intentions. We combined the above findings and concluded that new media use negatively influences fertility intentions of reproductive-aged women and further influences fertility intentions through the mediating effect of social trust. Thus, H2 is partially supported. The final model is depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T7">
<label>Table 7</label>
<caption><p>Results of mediating effects.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Item</bold></th>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Model 3</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Model 4</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">c</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total effect</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.026</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.034&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">a</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.041</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.047&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">b</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.030&#x0002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.030&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">a&#x0002A;b</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mediating effect value</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">a&#x0002A;b</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(Boot SE)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">a&#x0002A;b</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(z value)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80.413</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;63.99</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">a&#x0002A;b</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(<italic>p</italic>-value)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">a&#x0002A;b</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(95% BootCI)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.001 &#x0007E; 0.003</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.004 &#x0007E; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">c&#x00027;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Direct mediating effect</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.025</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.033&#x0002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Test result</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Not significant</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Partially mediated</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Effect account</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.14%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>&#x0002A;p &#x0003C; 0.05</italic>.</p>
<p><italic>Model 3: traditional media use-social trust-fertility intentions</italic>.</p>
<p><italic>Model 4: new media use-social trust-fertility intentions</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Final model.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpubh-10-882009-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s5">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec>
<title>Issue of Low Fertility in Mainland China: Increase Women&#x00027;s Fertility Intentions</title>
<p>As mentioned above, the fertility rate in mainland China has dropped to a record low in 2021. Prolonged low fertility rates will cause rapid decline and high aging of the population, and a range of adverse socio-economic consequences, putting China at significant risk of fertility crisis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>). Demographers consider fertility intentions an important predictor of fertility rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">71</xref>), a determining factor of fertility behaviors, and a key factor influencing fertility rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">72</xref>). In terms of the correlation between fertility intentions and fertility behaviors, the prevailing view is that the actual fertility behaviors of people are lower than their reported fertility intentions in a low-fertility society at the end of the demographic transition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">73</xref>). Wu and Li (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>) summarized the results of the surveys on fertility intentions in China in recent years and found that the average ideal number of children for the reproductive-aged Chinese people was significantly lower than the replacement level. Besides, their average intended number of children and the desired number of children were lower than the ideal number. The emergence of be-low-replacement fertility intentions marks a new stage in which low-fertility countries are stepping (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">74</xref>). The findings from this study also suggested low fertility intentions among Chinese women of reproductive age, which explained the low fertility rates in mainland China.</p>
<p>The Chinese government has noticed the issue of low fertility rates. It has begun to relax its long-standing one-child policy, such as the selective two-child policy in 2013 and the universal two-child policy in 2015. The effect of these policies on increasing the births number was relatively weak (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">75</xref>). In June 2020, the Chinese government announced implementing the three-child policy after releasing the seventh national census results. Some local governments complemented support such as fertility subsidies, housing security, and childcare support (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">76</xref>). However, the birth rates in China still declined after implementing the new policy. Although the short duration of the policy can explain the decline, the low birth rates in 2021 also suggested re-examining the relationship between fertility intentions and fertility behaviors. The governments need to simultaneously increase fertility intentions and behaviors of the reproductive-aged population when im-proving the fertility policies and enhancing relevant support (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">77</xref>). Factors influencing fertility intentions involved individual characteristics and structural factors such as economic, social, cultural, and institutional factors, requiring adjusting of structural factors to construct a fertility-friendly society (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Influence Mechanisms of Media Use on Women&#x00027;s Fertility Intentions</title>
<p>This study found that the influence of different media use on fertility intentions of reproductive-aged women was inconsistent. Groups with new media preference have significantly lower fertility intentions than groups with traditional media preference, and the increased new media use reduced fertility intentions of reproductive-aged women.</p>
<p>On the one hand, China&#x00027;s media system contributed to the above situation. Traditional media, such as radio, television, newspapers, and magazines, release reports under the premise of the party-controlled media and the state-owned system and take responsibility for propagating the policies and guidelines of the party and the nation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">78</xref>). Thus, fertility issues in traditional media mainly focus on introducing and interpreting national fertility policies. On the other hand, traditional media communications are mostly one-way communication with weak interactions between media and audiences and between the audiences themselves.</p>
<p>In contrast, information dissemination on the internet is open and anonymous, allowing people to express their opinions of events and issues freely. With the interactions and discussions, people easily explore a certain issue deeply. In the context of traditional Chinese culture, the fertility issue has often been discussed within interpersonal communication, especially the transmission of fertility conceptions from parents to offspring. Research confirmed that traditional concepts about fertility, such as &#x0201C;a man should have a wife, and a woman should have a husband,&#x0201D; &#x0201C;carrying forward the family with a son,&#x0201D; and &#x0201C;raising children for the old,&#x0201D; are still transmitted intergenerationally in rural areas of China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">79</xref>). People obtain fertility information from diverse recourses in the digital age and form more rational and pluralistic fertility conceptions through direct opinion expressions and interactions.</p>
<p>Furthermore, compared to traditional media, which promote fertility policies actively, online platforms disseminate fertility information and concepts via more diverse formats. First, new media platforms allow more information, including news reports, individual narratives, and expressions about fertility and parenting. Individual expressions on fertility issues can be positive or negative, while traditional media news is always positive. Studies showed that individual narratives are more persuasive to audiences than factual reports (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">80</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">81</xref>). From the content of Chinese social media, many women expressed the pain of childbirth and parenting on social media, which is more likely to influence women&#x00027;s fertility intentions than positive fertility policy propaganda. Also, the online dissemination of controversial policies and negative marriage and fertility news easily triggered and fermented negative emotions on social media, which further influences the fertility intentions of reproductive-aged women. For example, the Supreme People&#x00027;s Court of Shandong Province posted a WeChat article titled &#x0201C;Divorce cannot be sought solely on the grounds of cheating&#x0201D; on January 3, 2022, which quickly fermented on Sina Weibo and then generated strong negative emotions. Many female netizens expressed as &#x0201C;stay safe without marriage and childbirth&#x0201D; and &#x0201C;stay away from men or be unfortunate,&#x0201D; reflecting women&#x00027;s general distrust of men and marriage. A big data analysis of public opinion on the three-child policy on Sina Weibo indicated that Weibo users were generally negative and neutral to the policy and supporting measures. The negative emotions mainly reflected the worries about implementing the supporting policies, the high cost of raising children, and the fragmentation of retirement, fertility, and education policies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">82</xref>). The negative public opinion and emotions indicated the public distrust in current fertility policies and the social support system, thus expressing negative fertility intentions.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>How to Increase Fertility Intentions Through Improving Social Trust</title>
<p>This study suggested that social trust positively influences fertility intentions and mediating between media use and fertility intentions among reproductive-aged women. Many studies have confirmed the positive role of social trust in fertility intentions. The influence mechanism is that groups with high social trust are more willing to rely on social services and security institutions to support fertility, parenting, and education, helping women maintain the relationship between work and fertility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">52</xref>). Improvement of the social systems of fertility, childcare, and education needs the support of trusted policies and supporting measures. In terms of enhancing social trust, scholars proposed to increase both interpersonal and institutional trust (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">83</xref>). Interpersonal trust needs moral and educational influences and the reduction of social polarization and income disparity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">84</xref>). Besides, reducing social conflicts and ensuring public safety from the public policies are also necessary for enhancing interpersonal trust (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">85</xref>). To increase institutional trust, public policies should be responsible for the fair and effective implementation of the legal system, enhancement of social justice, insurance of employment, and economic development and equity in income and economic opportunities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">83</xref>).</p>
<p>How to increase women&#x00027;s fertility intentions through social trust improvement is also a matter for media. The literature revealed that media has a certain impact on social trust (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>). This study showed that new media use among Chinese reproductive-aged women positively correlated with social trust. Therefore, in the mediated society, there is a particular need to consider how social trust can be enhanced via new media platforms and further moderate women&#x00027;s fertility intentions. This study found that new media use negatively influenced the fertility intentions of reproductive-age women. Scholars argued that new media greatly increases women&#x00027;s perceptions of the potential fertility risks, such as family finances, children&#x00027;s education, marital status, childbirth risks, postpartum depression, postpartum recovery and life quality, which reduces women&#x00027;s fertility intentions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">86</xref>). Women&#x00027;s perceived risks of fertility also reflected the distrust in fertility policies and social support systems. On this occasion, the government has to monitor online public opinion and sentiment and timely respond to women&#x00027;s concerns about fertility issues. Furthermore, the government can utilize the new media agenda-setting to guide people to face fertility rationally. For example, the government can provide a detailed introduction and interpretation of the fertility policies and social support system and conduct scientific communication on fertility. Some countries have already implemented their online fertility health promotion programs. The Australian government has funded interactive websites and social media accounts, gaining over 5 million annual visits to the websites and 96,000 users&#x00027; engagement on social media (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">87</xref>). European countries have also set up websites on fertility topics, promoting public discourse around fertility issues and education and aiming to increase scientific awareness of fertility among their public (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">88</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s6">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study used CGSS data to examine that new media use negatively influences fertility intentions of reproductive-aged women, and social trust plays a mediating role between media use and fertility intentions. Besides, we further explored the mechanisms of how media use and social trust influence fertility intentions. This study provides a new perspective when researching fertility intentions and suggests strategies for the Chinese government to improve fertility intentions. The governments can utilize agenda-setting and change media reporting strategies.</p>
<p>However, this study has certain limitations and desires further qualitative research on this topic. On the one hand, this study used secondary data, and the research data is somewhat limited by the original survey questions. For example, the items of media use in the survey are limited. Our future research will further explore the relations between media use, social trust and women&#x00027;s fertility rates with a self-designed questionnaire. Also, future research will take the new fertility policies in China into account, such as the three-child policy. On the other hand, this study focused on women&#x00027;s fertility intentions, and the future study will expand the research attention to a more general dimension, which concludes the intentions of the male and the female.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s7">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://cgss.ruc.edu.cn">http://cgss.ruc.edu.cn</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Ethics Statement</title>
<p>The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Board at Nanjing Normal University. Written informed consent for this study was not required in accordance with local legislation and national guidelines. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>CN and HG designed the study and revised the manuscript. YY and HP analyzed the data. NY and JW were involved in manuscript writing. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s10">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 17CXW016).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s11">
<title>Publisher&#x00027;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec> </body>
<back>

<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1.</label>
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>The The Emptying Planet: The Global Impact of Declining Fertility Rates A Virtual, Roundtable,.</collab></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.cfr.org/event/emptying-planet-global-impact-declining-fertility-rates-virtual-roundtable">https://www.cfr.org/event/emptying-planet-global-impact-declining-fertility-rates-virtual-roundtable</ext-link> (accessed January 31, 2022).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhuang</surname> <given-names>Ye</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>China fertility report, 2006&#x02013;2016</article-title>. <source>China Popul Dev Stud</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>430</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42379-019-00022-9</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3.</label>
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Wang P,. The Total Population Will Keep Growing the Level of Urbanization Will be Steadily Improved. Statsgovcn.</collab></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/sjjd/202201/t20220118_1826538.html">http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/sjjd/202201/t20220118_1826538.html</ext-link> (accessed January 31, 2022).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>three signs of fertility crisis in china: low fertility, low fertility intention, and fertility deficit</article-title>. <source>J Shanxi Norm Univ</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>49</volume>:<fpage>61</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16207/j.cnki.1001-5957.20211211.004</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Research on fertility cost and benefit under low fertility level: a survey from Jiangsu Province</article-title>. <source>Chin Popul Sci</source>. (<year>2009</year>) 2:93&#x02013;102&#x0002B;112.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bongaarts</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Household size and composition in the developing world in the 1990s</article-title>. <source>Popul Stud.</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>55</volume>:<fpage>263</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>79</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00324720127697</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beaujouan</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berghammer</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The gap between lifetime fertility intentions and completed fertility in Europe and the United States: a cohort approach</article-title>. <source>Popul Res Policy Rev.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>38</volume>:<fpage>507</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>35</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11113-019-09516-3</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bein</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mynarska</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gauthier</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Do costs and benefits of children matter for religious people? Perceived consequences of parenthood and fertility intentions in Poland</article-title>. <source>J Biosoc Sci.</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>53</volume>:<fpage>419</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>35</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0021932020000280</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32787990</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Atalay</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whelan</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Housing wealth, fertility intentions and fertility</article-title>. <source>J Hous Econ.</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>54</volume>:<fpage>101787</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhe.2021.101787</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brinton</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bueno</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ol&#x000E1;h</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hellum</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Postindustrial fertility ideals, intentions, and gender inequality: a comparative qualitative analysis</article-title>. <source>Popul Dev Rev.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>44</volume>:<fpage>281</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>309</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/padr.12128</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morgan</surname> <given-names>SP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>MG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Low fertility at the turn of the twenty-first century</article-title>. <source>Annu Rev Sociol</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>32</volume>:<fpage>375</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>99</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122220</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20376287</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuhnt</surname> <given-names>A-K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trappe</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Channels of social influence on the realization of short-term fertility intentions in Germany</article-title>. <source>Adv Life Course Res</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>16</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>29</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.alcr.2015.10.002</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>K-W</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The effect of contraceptive knowledge on fertility: the roles of mass media and social networks</article-title>. <source>J Fam Econ Issues.</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>32</volume>:<fpage>257</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>67</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10834-011-9248-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21654905</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhavnani</surname> <given-names>RR</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nellis</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Can Government-Controlled Media Cause Social Change? Television and Fertility in India.</source> <publisher-loc>Madison, Wisconsin</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University of Wisconsin</publisher-name> (<year>2016</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A multilevel study of the impact of egalitarian attitudes toward gender roles on fertility desires in China</article-title>. <source>Popul Res Policy Rev.</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>747</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>69</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11113-020-09600-z</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nie</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The influence of internet usage frequency on women&#x00027;s fertility intentions&#x02014;the mediating effects of gender role attitudes</article-title>. <source>Int J Environ Res Public Health.</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>4784</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph18094784</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33946141</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Murphy</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Link</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names></name> <name><surname>Childs</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tesfaye</surname> <given-names>CL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dean</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stern</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>Social media in public opinion research: executive summary of the AAPOR task force on emerging technologies in public opinion research</article-title>. <source>Public Opin Q.</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>78</volume>:<fpage>788</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>94</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/poq/nfu053</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Justwan</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bakker</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berejikian</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Measuring social trust and trusting the measure</article-title>. <source>J Soc Sci</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>55</volume>:<fpage>149</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>59</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soscij.2017.10.001</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Paek</surname> <given-names>H-J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hove</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Effective strategies for responding to rumors about risks: the case of radiation-contaminated food in South Korea</article-title>. <source>Public Relat Rev</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>45</volume>:<fpage>101762</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.02.006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32288053</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20.</label>
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yamamura</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antonio</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Trust Fertility: Evidence From OECD Countries. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.</article-title> (<year>2011</year>). Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/29978">https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/29978</ext-link> (accessed January 31, 2022).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ying</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yiyin</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiaojiang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>En</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>What determines &#x0201C;giving birth to a son&#x0201D;: the social transformation of how institution and culture affect women&#x00027;s fertility choices</article-title>. <source>J Chinese Sociol.</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>22</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40711-017-0057-2</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hesketh</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>ZW</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The effect of China&#x00027;s one-child family policy after 25 years</article-title>. <source>N Engl J Med</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>353</volume>:<fpage>1171</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJMhpr051833</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16162890</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>From passive follow to active choice:the change track of rural women&#x00027;s willingness about children&#x00027;s sex since the founding of the People&#x00027;s Republic of China</article-title>. <source>Zhejiang Soc Sci</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>26</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>36</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14167/j.zjss.2019.09.003</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Women in China moving forward: progress, challenges and reflections</article-title>. <source>Soc Incl</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>23</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>35</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17645/si.v8i2.2690</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Toulemon</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Testa</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Fertility intentions and actual fertility: a complex relationship</article-title>. <source>Popul Soc.</source> (<year>2005</year>) <volume>415</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Billari</surname> <given-names>FC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Philipov</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Testa</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control: Explaining fertility intentions in Bulgaria</article-title>. <source>Eur J Popul.</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>25</volume>:<fpage>439</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>65</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10680-009-9187-9</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Research on fertility intention of urban and rural residents: a review</article-title>. <source>Popul J</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>17</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>22</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Preis</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tovim</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mor</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grisaru-Granovsky</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Samueloff</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benyamini</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Fertility intentions and the way they change following birth-a prospective longitudinal study</article-title>. <source>BMC Pregnancy Childbirth.</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12884-020-02922-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32303192</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gray</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reimondos</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Childbearing desires of childless men and women: When are goals adjusted?</article-title> <source>Adv Life Course Res.</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>141</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.alcr.2012.09.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24796265</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility</article-title>. <source>J Aust Popul Assoc</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF03029445</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12648291</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lesthaeghe</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van de Kaa</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Twee demografische transities</article-title>. <source>Bevolking: groei en krimp.</source> (<year>1986</year>) <volume>1986</volume>:<fpage>9</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>24</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Per capita household income, intergenerational social mobility, and fertility desire</article-title>. <source>J Labor Econ</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>117</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>40</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Measurement and application of fertility intention</article-title>. <source>Chin Popul Sci.</source> (<year>2014</year>) 6:15&#x02013;5&#x0002B;126.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Women&#x00027;s status, childbearing experience, and fertility intention: an analysis of women of childbearing age in Minority provinces and regions</article-title>. <source>J Yunnan Normal Univ</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>52</volume>:<fpage>91</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Fertility intentions for a second child in china: female educational attainment and assortative marriage</article-title>. <source>Popul J</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>41</volume>:<fpage>16</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>27</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16405/j.cnki.1004-129X.2019.03.002</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Per capita household income, female education level Willingness to have a second child with Chinese women of childbearing age: empirical analysis based on CGSS2017 data. Fujian forum</article-title>. <source>Humanit Soc Sci Ed</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>98</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>108</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>House price, fertility rates and reproductive intentions</article-title>. <source>China Econ. Rev</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>62</volume>:<fpage>101496</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101496</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Socioeconomic determinants of rural women&#x00027;s desired fertility: a survey in rural Shaanxi, China</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>e0202968</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0202968</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30212489</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The impact of social security on fertility intention: evidence from new rural cooperative medical care</article-title>. <source>Econ Res J</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>50</volume>:<fpage>103</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>17</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dewi</surname> <given-names>RK</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suryadarma</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suryahadi</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The impact of media on behaviour: evidence from television coverage expansion and declining fertility in Indonesia</article-title>. <source>Dev Policy Rev</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>36</volume>:<fpage>O552</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>63</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/dpr.12310</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barber</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Axinn</surname> <given-names>WG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>New ideas and fertility limitation: the role of mass media</article-title>. <source>J Marriage Fam.</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>66</volume>:<fpage>1180</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>200</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00086.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adair</surname> <given-names>LE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brase</surname> <given-names>GL</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akao</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jantsch</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Babyfever: social and media influences on fertility desires</article-title>. <source>Pers Individ Dif.</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>135</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.026</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Knobloch-Westerwick</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Willis</surname> <given-names>LE</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kennard</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Media impacts on women&#x00027;s fertility desires: a prolonged exposure experiment</article-title>. <source>J Health Commun.</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>647</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>57</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10810730.2016.1153757</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27166510</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Billari</surname> <given-names>FC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Giuntella</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stella</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Does broadband Internet affect fertility?</article-title> <source>Popul Stud</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>73</volume>:<fpage>297</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>316</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00324728.2019.1584327</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30919746</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pundak</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Issakov</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gluska</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gandelsman E et</surname> <given-names>al</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Can social support on facebook influence fertility outcomes?</article-title> <source>Reprod Sci.</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>212</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s43032-021-00611-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34008155</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46.</label>
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Putnam R,. The Prosperous Community: Social Capital Public Life. The American prospect</collab></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www">http://www</ext-link>. prospect. org/print/vol/13 (accessed April 7, 2022).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>47.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Batrancea</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nichita</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olsen</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kogler</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kirchler</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoelzl E et</surname> <given-names>al</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance across 44 nations</article-title>. <source>J Econ Psychol.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>74</volume>:<fpage>102191</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.joep.2019.102191</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<label>48.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Putnam</surname> <given-names>RD</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Bowling alone: America&#x00027;s declining social capital</article-title>. <source>Cult Politics</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>223</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>34</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-349-62397-6_12</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<label>49.</label>
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Ockell PO,. Generalized trust fertility: a micro-level analysis of social trust its relationship to fertility.</collab></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-186759">http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-186759</ext-link> (accessed April 7, 2022).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<label>50.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aassve</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Billari</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pessin</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Trust and Fertility Dynamics</article-title>. <source>Social Forces.</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>95</volume>:<fpage>663</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>92</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/sf/sow080</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28003707</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51">
<label>51.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moy</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scheufele</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Media Effects on Political and Social Trust</article-title>. <source>Journal Mass Commun Q</source>. (<year>2000</year>) <volume>77</volume>:<fpage>744</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>59</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/107769900007700403</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<label>52.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gross</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aday</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brewer</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A Panel study of media effects on political and social Trust after September 11, 2001. Harvard international</article-title>. <source>Int J Press Polit.</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>49</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>73</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1081180X04269138</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<label>53.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tidwell</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walther</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: getting to know one another a bit at a time</article-title>. <source>Hum Commun Res</source>. (<year>2002</year>) 28: 317&#x02013;48. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<label>54.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kwon</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nah</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Localized social media and civic life: Motivations, trust, and civic participation in local community contexts. Journal of Information</article-title>. <source>Technol Politics</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>55</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>69</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/19331681.2020.1805086</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<label>55.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Best</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krueger</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>online interactions and social capital</article-title>. <source>Soc Sci Comput Rev</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<fpage>395</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>410</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0894439306286855</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<label>56.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Valenzuela</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kee</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Is there social capital in a social network site?: facebook use and college students&#x00027; life satisfaction, trust, and participation.</article-title> <source>J Comput-Mediat Comm</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>875</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>901</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<label>57.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rheingold</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A Slice of Life in My Virtual Community</article-title>. <source>Global networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs.</source> (<year>1993</year>) <fpage>57</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>80</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<label>58.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shah</surname> <given-names>DV</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kwak</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holbe</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Connecting&#x0201C; and&#x0201D; disconnecting&#x0201C; with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital</article-title>. <source>Political Commun.</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>141</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>62</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/105846001750322952</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<label>59.</label>
<citation citation-type="web"><source>Chinese General Social Survey</source>. Cgss.ruc.edu.cn. (<year>2022</year>). Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://cgss.ruc.edu.cn">http://cgss.ruc.edu.cn</ext-link> (accessed January 31, 2022).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<label>60.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alimige</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Deviation between fertility desire and fertility behavior in China and the effect of family support</article-title>. <source>Popul Res</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>45</volume>:<fpage>18</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>35</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<label>61.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trent</surname> <given-names>RB</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Evidence bearing on the construct validity of&#x0201D; ideal family size"</article-title>. <source>Popul Environ.</source> (<year>1980</year>) <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>309</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>27</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF01255345</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<label>62.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Slater</surname> <given-names>MD</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Operationalizing and analyzing exposure: the foundation of media effects research</article-title>. <source>Journal Mass Commun Q</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>81</volume>:<fpage>168</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>83</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/107769900408100112</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<label>63.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Welch</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rivera</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Conway</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yonkoski</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lupton</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name> <name><surname>Giancola</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Determinants and Consequences of Social Trust<sup>&#x0002A;</sup></article-title>. <source>Sociol Inq</source>. (<year>2005</year>) 75:453-73. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1475-682X.2005.00132.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29765572</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64">
<label>64.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>How does social capital affect fertility intention? evidence from Chinese general social survey</article-title>. <source>Collected Essays Finance Econ.</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>3</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>12</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13762/j.cnki.cjlc.20210412.001</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<label>65.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hagquist</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stenbeck</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Goodness of fit in regression analysis&#x02013;R2 and G2 reconsidered</article-title>. <source>Qual Quant.</source> (<year>1998</year>) <volume>32</volume>:<fpage>229</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>45</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1004328601205</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<label>66.</label>
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Jim F,. How to Interpret Regression Models that Have Significant Variables But a Low R-Squared.</collab></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). Available online at:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://statisticsbyjim.com/regression/low-r-squared-regression/">https://statisticsbyjim.com/regression/low-r-squared-regression/</ext-link> (accessed April 10, 2022).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<label>67.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lewis-Beck</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skalaban</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The R-squared: some straight talk</article-title>. <source>Polit Anal.</source> (<year>1990</year>) <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>153</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>71</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pan/2.1.153</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<label>68.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>MacKinnon</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lockwood</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoffman</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name> <name><surname>West</surname> <given-names>SG</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sheets</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects</article-title>. <source>Psychol Methods</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>83</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11928892</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69">
<label>69.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mackinnon</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lockwood</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods</article-title>. <source>Multivar Behav Res</source>. (<year>2004</year>) 39: 99&#x02013;128. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20157642</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B70">
<label>70.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>MacKinnon</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheong</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pirlott</surname> <given-names>AG</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Statistical mediation analysis</article-title>. In: <source>APA Handbook of research Methods in Psychology, Vol 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological. American Psychological Association.</source> (<year>2012</year>). p. <fpage>313</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>31</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/13620-018</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<label>71.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morgan</surname> <given-names>SP</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis?</article-title> <source>Demography</source>. (<year>2003</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>589</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>603</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1353/dem.2003.0037</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14686132</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B72">
<label>72.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balbo</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <name><surname>Billari</surname> <given-names>FC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mills</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Fertility in advanced societies: a review of research</article-title>. <source>Eur J Popul</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>29</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>38</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23440941</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B73">
<label>73.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Population dynamics in a low-fertility society and its response: a case study of Fertility intention and behavior in Shanghai</article-title>. <source>Explor Contention</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>13</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<label>74.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goldstein</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lutz</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Testa</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe</article-title>. <source>Popul Res Policy Rev</source>. (<year>2003</year>) <volume>22</volume>:<fpage>479</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>96</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/B:POPU.0000020962.80895.4a</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<label>75.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>The situation of low fertility, dilemma, and outlet of population policy under the three-child policy in China</article-title>. <source>Youth Explor</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>04</volume>:<fpage>50</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>61</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13583/j.cnki.issn1004-3780.2021.04.005</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<label>76.</label>
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Three Children&#x00027;s Policy is Ineffective? National Health Commission: It Is Not Scientific to Expect Immediate Results. Stdaily.com</collab></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.stdaily.com/index/kejixinwen/202201/b465ef21dcfa486ea2bc2fc6b156ad84.shtml">http://www.stdaily.com/index/kejixinwen/202201/b465ef21dcfa486ea2bc2fc6b156ad84.shtml</ext-link> (accessed April 5, 2022).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<label>77.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Zhang Y,Jia G,Tang M,Chen G, Zhang L. Research progress of low fertility in China: a literature review</article-title>. <source>Populat. Develop.</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>9</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>21</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<label>78.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Media, Market, and Democracy in China: Between the Party Line and the Bottom Line.</source> <publisher-loc>Urbana, Illinois</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University of Illinois Press</publisher-name> (<year>1998</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<label>79.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Review on fertility intentions: theories and empirical studies</article-title>. <source>Sociol Res</source>. (<year>2020</year>) 35:218&#x02013;40&#x0002B;46. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19934/j.cnki.shxyj.2020.04.011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33321056</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B80">
<label>80.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hargreaves</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Speers</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Towards a Better Map: Science, the Public and the Media</source>. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), Swindon, UK (<year>2003</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24939013</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B81">
<label>81.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Provencher</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x000E9;gin</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tremblay</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mongeau</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boivin</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lemieux</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Short-term effects of a &#x0201C;Health-At-Every-Size&#x0201D; approach on eating behaviors and appetite ratings</article-title>. <source>Obesity</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>957</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>66</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/oby.2007.638</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17426331</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B82">
<label>82.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Public opinion effect and enlightenment of three-child policy: network big data analysis based on NLP</article-title>. <source>Chin Youth Stud</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>46</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>53</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2021.0148</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<label>83.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kwon</surname> <given-names>OY</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Social Trust and Economic Development: the Case of South Korea</source>. <publisher-loc>Cheltenham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Edward Elgar Publishing</publisher-name> (<year>2019</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<label>84.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Knack</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keefer</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Does social capital have an economic payoff? a cross-country investigation</article-title>. <source>Q J Econ</source>. (<year>1997</year>) <volume>112</volume>:<fpage>1251</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>88</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1162/003355300555475</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<label>85.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Delhey</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Newton</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Who trusts?: the origins of social trust in seven societies.</article-title> <source>Eur Societies</source>. (<year>2003</year>) <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>93</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>137</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1461669032000072256</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<label>86.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Traditional gender concept, information dissemination, women&#x00027;s fertility desire: a questionnaire survey based on women of childbearing age</article-title>. <source>J Southwest Univ Nationalities</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>146</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>52</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B87">
<label>87.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hammarberg</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Norman</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name> <name><surname>McLachlan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Michelmore</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Development of a health promotion programme to improve awareness of factors that affect fertility, and evaluation of its reach in the first 5 years</article-title>. <source>Reprod Biomedicine Society Online.</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>33</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>40</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rbms.2017.06.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29774264</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B88">
<label>88.</label>
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harper</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hammarberg</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simopoulou</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koert</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pedro</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Massin</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. <article-title>The International Fertility Education Initiative: research and action to improve fertility awareness</article-title>. <source>Hum Reprod Open</source>. (<year>2021</year>) 2021: hoab031. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/hropen/hoab031</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34532596</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<glossary>
<def-list>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<def-item><term>CGSS</term>
<def><p>Chinese General Social Survey.</p></def></def-item>
</def-list>
</glossary> 
</back>
</article>