<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Psychol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Psychology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Psychol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-1078</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1661379</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Psychology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The impact of work concerns on teaching effectiveness: a structural equation modeling and multiple regression analysis in Chinese private universities</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>Mingyu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3124440/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Abdullah</surname>
<given-names>Mohd Khairuddin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Qun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>School of Arts and Media, Qingdao Hengxing University of Science and Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Qingdao</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Faculty of Education and Sport Studies, University Malaysia Sabah</institution>, <addr-line>Kota Kinabalu</addr-line>, <country>Malaysia</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1532274/overview">Xiantong Yang</ext-link>, Fujian Normal University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3174633/overview">Pham Van Tuan</ext-link>, Vinh University, Vietnam</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3174842/overview">Imron Rosidi</ext-link>, State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Mohd Khairuddin Abdullah, <email>khair@ums.edu.my</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>18</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1661379</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>30</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>08</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Liang, Abdullah and Wang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Liang, Abdullah and Wang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>It is crucial to understand how young teachers cope with work concerns for improving teaching quality in the Chinese private higher education institutions. This study investigates the relationship between different stages of such concerns and teacher effectiveness among young lecturers in private universities. These lecturers often face workload pressure and a lack of career support, which may influence their professional development and teacher effectiveness. This research involved 416 full-time lecturers under 40 from four private universities located in Shandong Province. The sample was selected through a multi-stage sampling method: private universities were stratified into four categories, one university from each category was purposively selected, and participants were randomly sampled. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire based on the Stages of Concern and the School Teacher Effectiveness Questionnaire. Pearson correlation, multiple regression, and structural equation modeling were conducted for analysis. Results show that task concerns and impact concerns significantly influenced teacher effectiveness across three dimensions: instructional planning and strategies, assessment, and learning environment. In contrast, self-concerns showed weaker influence. These findings suggest that work concerns reflect not only stress but also deeper professional motivation, pointing to the need for more targeted support strategies to improve teacher effectiveness and career growth.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>work concerns</kwd>
<kwd>teaching effectiveness</kwd>
<kwd>young teachers</kwd>
<kwd>structural equation modeling</kwd>
<kwd>multiple regression</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="3"/>
<table-count count="8"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="54"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="8034"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Organizational Psychology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Chinese private universities have emerged as critical players in expanding access to tertiary education and promoting regional educational equity in the context of China&#x2019;s higher education reforms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Li et al., 2022</xref>). According to the Ministry of Education in 2023, there are approximately 750 private institutions now serve more than six million students across the country. These institutions operate under distinct structural and policy environments, facing constraints such as limited public funding, weaker research capacity, and faculty recruitment challenges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Wang, 2022</xref>). In recent years, researchers have paid much more attention to the professional development and teaching effectiveness of young university teachers, as their work plays a crucial role in shaping both the quality of education and the reputation of their institutions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Liu et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Xiao, 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Young lecturers working in private universities are often in the early stages of their careers, facing the pressures of heavy workloads and limited professional support (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Zhou and Wang, 2025</xref>). In Shandong province, where private higher education has expanded rapidly, issues such as high faculty turnover, a shortage of training opportunities, and limited access to research platforms are frequently reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Bing, 2023</xref>). These conditions may lead to reduced teaching effectiveness. Although there have been policy efforts aimed at improving teaching standards in private institutions, there is still a gap in research on how young lecturers experience and manage their professional concerns in their daily work.</p>
<p>It&#x2019;s still unclear whether the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Fuller (1969)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Hall and Hord (2020)</xref> fits the Chinese universities. According to this model, teachers&#x2019; work concerns include different stages: self-concerns (focusing on themselves), task concerns (handling teaching tasks), and impact concerns (focusing on their impact on students). These different concerns are believed to shape how open when teachers use teaching methods and how active in their professional growth. Although CBAM has been widely used in K-12 schools in Western countries, it is still not clear whether this model applies to young lecturers working in China&#x2019;s private universities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Fischer et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">George et al., 2008</xref>). Another key problem is teaching effectiveness which is crucial in students achievement and outcome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Engida et al., 2024</xref>). It reflects a teacher&#x2019;s capacity to design proper teaching plans, implement effective instructional practices, monitor student learning, and maintain a positive classroom climate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Akram et al., 2022</xref>). As a multidimensional construct, it consists of various aspects of teaching performance, such as planning, instruction, classroom management, and assessment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Sabharwal and Miah, 2024</xref>). In this study, teaching effectiveness is conceptualized through three core dimensions: instructional planning and strategies, assessment, and learning environment.</p>
<p>Recent studies indicate that higher levels of work engagements are positively correlated with instructional behaviors, reflective teaching, and greater student achievement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Christopher and Newman, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Walugembe et al., 2022</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Mendez et al. (2024)</xref> found that teachers&#x2019; concerns on work can influence their psychological wellbeing and their instructional planning and classroom effectiveness. Nevertheless, few empirical studies have confirmed the predictive relationship between different stages of work concern and teaching effectiveness, especially in Chinese private universities, where teaching demands are very high, but support systems remain underdeveloped.</p>
<p>This study aims to fill that gap by revealing the relationship between work concerns and teaching effectiveness among early-career lecturers in Chinese private universities, using validated instruments such as the stages of concern questionnaire (SoCQ) and the school teacher effectiveness questionnaire (STEQ). This investigation focuses on three dimensions of teaching effectiveness: instructional planning and strategies, assessment, and learning environment. It also considers how different stage of concerns contribute to these outcomes. By using structural equation modeling (SEM) and multiple regression, this study provides a quantitative examination of how internal psychological concerns of young teachers shape their teaching effectiveness.</p>
<p>The contribution of this research lies in its use of the CBAM framework to the unique setting of Chinese private higher education and new empirical evidence to the global conversation on teacher development. Moreover, it offers guidance for institutional leaders who can help to in there management practice, such as mentorship, workload adjustment, and professional training, which could make young teachers more excellent. Therefore, this research addresses an important but often overlooked issue: how early-career teachers in Chinese private universities develop professionally. It brings both new ideas and practical advice to the field.</p>
<sec id="sec2">
<label>1.1</label>
<title>Objectives of the study</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>i) To check the current situation of work concerns and teacher effectiveness among young teachers in Chinese private universities.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>ii) To investigate the relationships between work concerns and teaching effectiveness among young teachers in Chinese private universities.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>iii) To examine the influence of work concerns on teaching effectiveness among young teachers in Chinese private universities.</p></list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>1.2</label>
<title>Research questions</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>i) What is the stage of work concerns and the level of teacher effectiveness among young teachers in Chinese private universities?</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>ii) What is the relationship between work concerns and teacher effectiveness among young teachers in Chinese private universities?</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>iii) How do work concerns impact teacher effectiveness among young teachers in Chinese private universities?</p></list-item>
</list>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec4">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Research design</title>
<p>This research follows a quantitative approach, utilizing a cross-sectional survey to collect data. To examine the connections between various stages of work concerns and teaching effectiveness, structural equation modeling (SEM) is used. Additionally, multiple linear regression analysis is conducted to evaluate how well different stages of work concern can predict teaching effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Population and sample</title>
<p>The population in this study comprised young full-time teachers employed in private universities across Shandong Province, China. The Chinese Ministry of Education defines young university lectures as those under the age of 40 or those who have &#x003C;10 years of teaching experience with a master&#x2019;s degree or higher. Shandong is one of China&#x2019;s largest higher education hubs. Private universities in Shandong have expanded rapidly in the last two decades. However, young teachers here often face some challenges such as limited teaching experience, difficulty in adapting to digital teaching environments, and insufficient leadership and organizational support. These challenges result in uneven levels of teaching effectiveness and affecting student learning outcomes. Therefore, this study choose young lectures in Shandong&#x2019;s private universities as research population.</p>
<p>According to the Statistical Bulletin on the Development of Education in Shandong Province (2023) issued by the provincial Department of Education, there are currently 44 private regular colleges and universities in the province, employing approximately 22,500 young teachers in 2024. It reflects a hiring trend that favors recent university graduates and early-career educators. These young teachers play a critical role in the development of private universities, which makes them especially important when studying teaching effectiveness and the challenges they face in their work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Ye et al., 2019</xref>). Their struggles and opportunities for career growth help to reveal key aspects in Chinese private universities. To make sure the sample was diverse, the study used stratified random sampling across university types (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Howell et al., 2020</xref>). According to the sample size determination table by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Krejcie and Morgan (1970)</xref>, this study needs at least 380 participants.</p>
<p>To ensure the representativeness of the sample, the study employed a multistage sampling strategy. All 44 private universities in Shandong Province were first stratified into four categories: regular undergraduate, vocational undergraduate, independent colleges, and vocational colleges. From each category, one medium-sized university was purposively selected on the basis of typical institutional characteristics such as size, location, organizational structure, and the presence of young teaching staff. This approach ensured that the diversity of private universities in the province was adequately reflected. Within each of the four institutions, simple random sampling was then applied to select young lecturers, resulting in a total of 416 valid responses and an overall sampling ratio of 19.2%. Although purposive selection at the university level introduces some limitations, the overall strategy ensured that the sample was diverse, representative, and suitable for generalizing findings to similar educational contexts within China.</p>
<p>A total of 550 questionnaires were distributed across four private universities. Out of these, 450 completed questionnaires were returned, resulting in a response rate of 81.8%. After data screening procedures, 416 questionnaires were retained as valid responses, representing a valid response rate of 92.4% among returned surveys. Before collecting the data, participants were fully informed about the purpose of the study and were assured that their answers would be kept private. The study received ethical approval from all four participating universities, and all teachers provided informed consent.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Instruments</title>
<p>Data for this study were collected using a structured questionnaire with three sections, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>. The questions were adapted from two well-established sources: the stages of concerns questionnaire (SoC) by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">George et al. (2008)</xref> and the school teacher effectiveness questionnaire (STEQ) by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Akram (2018)</xref>. All items were rated on a five-point Likert scale, from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), based on how much participants agreed with each statement.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Distribution of items.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Section</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Dimensions</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Items</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Demographic details</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Gender, age, teaching experience, qualification, and subject area</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Work concerns</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>Self-concerns</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Task-concerns</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Impact-concerns</p></list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Teacher effectiveness</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>Instructional Planning and Strategies</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Assessment</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Learning environment</p></list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>This questionnaire was adapted through a rigorous process to ensure validity in the Chinese private university context. The original instruments were reviewed by an educational management expert to evaluate content relevance and item clarity. Based on this review, ambiguous and redundant items were revised or removed. Then, the questionnaires were translated into Chinese by a bilingual specialist, and subsequently reviewed by a local educational management scholar to ensure cultural appropriateness and conceptual equivalence. To further strengthen validity, a back-translation into English was carried out by independent translators to verify consistency with the original versions. These procedures ensured that the items were linguistically accurate, culturally sensitive, and contextually meaningful.</p>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.3.1</label>
<title>Section A: Demographic information</title>
<p>There are five items in this section to collect basic background information from the participants which covers age, gender, teaching experience, qualification, and academic subject area. Respondents simply needed to tick the box that matched their situation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.3.2</label>
<title>Section B: Work concerns</title>
<p>This section was adapted form items in the stages of concerns questionnaire (SoC), which is widely used to assess teachers&#x2019; attitudes and concerns in their works. This study focus on three stages of work concerns among young teachers: self-concerns, which are about feeling confident and capable in their work; task-concerns, which deal with managing time and working duties; and impact-concerns, which reflect their desire in students&#x2019; learning achievements and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.3.3</label>
<title>Section C: Teaching effectiveness</title>
<p>The final section was adapted from the school teacher effectiveness questionnaire (STEQ). In this research, the variable teaching effectiveness was measured using three key dimensions:</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>i) Instructional planning and strategies, focusing on how teachers design lessons and deliver content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Burt, 2022</xref>);</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>ii) Assessment, addressing how teachers evaluate student learning and use feedback (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Black and Wiliam, 2018</xref>);</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>iii) Learning environment, concerning the classroom atmosphere and teacher-student interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Zoromski et al., 2021</xref>).</p></list-item>
</list>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Pilot study</title>
<p>The questionnaire was initially reviewed by two experts in educational research to ensure clarity, cultural appropriateness, and alignment with the research objectives. A pilot test was also conducted with a small group of 288 participants. The results indicated that both work concerns and teaching effectiveness scales show high internal reliability, with Cronbach&#x2019;s alpha coefficients ranging from 0.897 to 0.927, and all items showing strong item-total correlations. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified three distinct factors for each scale, accounting for over 60% of the total variance, with all factor loadings exceeding 0.5. The KMO values (0.947 and 0.914, respectively) and significant Bartlett&#x2019;s test results confirmed the suitability of the data for factor analysis.</p>
<p>Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was also conducted to assess the model fit. The confirmatory factor models were shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">2</xref>. <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref> shows that X<sup>2</sup>/df values (1.425, 2.071) are all below 3, indicating acceptable model fit. GFI values (0.903, 0.913) and AGFI values (0.885, 0.886) are all above 0.8, meeting the required threshold. IFI values (0.972, 0.959) exceed 0.9, as do CFI and TLI, confirming good model fit. RMSEA values (0.038, 0.061) are all below 0.08, further validating the models. In addition, both the discriminant and convergent validity of the scales were confirmed, indicating that the measures were both reliable and valid for the purposes of the main study.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Confirmatory factor model (work concern).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-16-1661379-g001.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Diagram showing a structural model with three main constructs: Self Concern, Task Concern, and Impact Concern. Each construct is represented by an oval and linked to various items labeled C1 to C25, represented as rectangles. Arrows indicate relationships between the constructs and items, annotated with loading values. Error terms, labeled e1 to e25, are linked to each item. Correlation values are shown between the constructs.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Confirmatory factor model (teacher effectiveness).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-16-1661379-g002.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">A path diagram with three connected ovals labeled "Instructional Planning and Strategies," "Assessment," and "Learning Environment." Each oval links to various rectangles labeled D1 to D17, which then connect to circles labeled e1 to e17. Arrows and numbers indicate variable relationships and factor loadings.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Model fitting results.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Evaluating indicator</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">NC (X<sup>2</sup>/df)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">AGFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">IFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">TLI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">CFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">RMSEA</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Work concerns</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.425</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.903</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.885</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.972</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.969</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.972</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.038</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Teacher effectiveness</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.071</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.913</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.886</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.959</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.952</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.959</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.061</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Adaptation standard</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C; 3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C; 0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Compliance with standards</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p>The gathered data were analyzed through a combination of descriptive and inferential statistical methods. All responses were screened for completeness, accuracy, and consistency. After excluding incomplete or invalid entries, 416 valid questionnaires were retained for further analysis. The SPSS 26.0 and AMOS 24.0 were used for the data statistical analysis.</p>
<p>First, descriptive statistics were calculated to describe the background of the participants, including their gender, age, teaching experience, qualifications, and academic subject areas. The study looked at means, standard deviations, skewness, and kurtosis to check if the data were normally distributed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Hatem et al., 2022</xref>). To explore the connection between work concerns and teaching effectiveness, Pearson&#x2019;s correlation was used, with a significance level set at 0.05. This method can help identify whether there were significant relationship between the different stages of work concerns and teaching effectiveness, as well as the strength and direction of these relationships (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Schober et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Structural equation modeling (SEM) was also carried out to examine how work concerns influence teaching effectiveness. Path coefficients, standard errors, and <italic>p</italic>-values were reported to show the strength of these connections. In addition, multiple linear regression was conducted to further confirm how dimensions of work concerns could predict teaching effectiveness. In this analysis, the three stages of work concerns were used as predictors, while dimensions of teaching effectiveness were the outcome variables. The results included regression coefficients, R<sup>2</sup> values, and p-values to see which factors had the strongest influence. Before running the regression, multicollinearity, homoscedasticity, linearity, and independence of residuals were test to ensure the results were reliable.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec13">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Demographic characteristics</title>
<p>A total of 416 young full-time teachers participated in the study. Among them, 57.7% were female and 42.3% were male. In terms of age, the majority of respondents (39.4%) were between 25 and 30&#x202F;years old, followed by 30&#x2013;35&#x202F;years (25.7%), 35&#x2013;40&#x202F;years (17.5%), and 25 and below (17.3%). Regarding teaching experience, more than half of the participants (55%) had between 1 and 5&#x202F;years of experience. Additionally, 18.3% had 5&#x2013;10&#x202F;years of teaching experience, 19.2% had over 10&#x202F;years, and 7.5% had one year or less. As for academic qualifications, most respondents held a master&#x2019;s degree (78.4%), while 21.6% had obtained a doctoral degree. In terms of subject area, the largest group came from Arts, Social Sciences, and Humanities (29.8%), followed by Computing and Science (22.1%), Engineering and Technology (18%), Academic Subjects such as Chinese, English, and Mathematics (19%), Medicine and Pharmacy (8.4%), and others (2.6%).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Common method bias (CMB) test</title>
<p>In order to address the possible biases issue due to the reliance on self-reported measures, Harman&#x2019;s single-factor test was conducted. The results of the exploratory factor analysis revealed that six factors had eigenvalues &#x003E;1, and the first factor accounted for 36.230% of the total variance, which is below the recommended threshold of 40%. This indicates that common method bias is unlikely to pose a serious threat to the validity of the results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Baumgartner et al., 2021</xref>). To further strengthen the assessment, a CFA-based Common Latent Factor approach was applied, in which all measurement items were allowed to load on their respective constructs as well as on an unmeasured latent method factor. The analysis showed that the inclusion of the method factor did not substantially improve model fit, and the changes in the main path coefficients were all below 0.20. These findings suggest that common method bias does not pose a serious threat in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Descriptive analysis</title>
<p>As presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>, the average score for overall work concerns is 3.567, suggesting that participants generally experience a moderate level of concern related to their professional roles. Among the three dimensions, Impact Concern shows the highest mean value (M&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.651), indicating that respondents place greater emphasis on the influence their teaching has on others. In contrast, Task Concern records the lowest mean (M&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.477), reflecting relatively less focus on day-to-day responsibilities. The standard deviations across the subscales indicate acceptable variability in responses. Additionally, all variables exhibited skewness and kurtosis within the acceptable &#x2212;2 to +2 range, suggesting approximate normality of the data. This justifies the further use of parametric statistical techniques such as <italic>t</italic>-tests, correlation analysis, multiple regression, and structural equation modeling.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Descriptive statistics result for the level of work concerns.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Components</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number of items</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">M</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Skewness</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Kurtosis</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Self-concern</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.573</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.938</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.845</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.277</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Task Concern</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.477</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.878</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.656</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.422</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Impact Concern</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.651</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.855</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.658</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.609</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Overall</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">25</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.567</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.766</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;1.033</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.324</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref> illustrates that the overall mean score of variable teaching effectiveness is 3.375, reflecting a moderate perception among the participants. Among the three dimensions, Instructional Planning and Strategies received the highest average rating (M&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.527), suggesting that participants felt most confident in this area. In contrast, Assessment recorded the lowest mean score (M&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.253), pointing to relatively lower perceived effectiveness in evaluating student learning. The standard deviations, ranging from 0.785 to 0.989, reflect a moderate degree of response dispersion across items. Moreover, the overall kurtosis value of &#x2212;0.106 is very close to zero, implying that the distribution of responses approximates normality. Given the fulfillment of the normality assumption, the dataset is deemed suitable for conducting further parametric analyses, including independent samples <italic>t</italic>-tests, correlation, multiple regression, and structural equation modeling.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Descriptive statistics result in the level of teaching effectiveness.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Components</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Number of items</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">M</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Skewness</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Kurtosis</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Instructional planning and strategies</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.527</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.989</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.513</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.792</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Assessment</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.253</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.948</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.272</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;1.017</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Learning environment</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.345</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.879</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.688</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Overall</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.375</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.785</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.700</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.106</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The findings provide meaningful insights into the professional development dynamics of young university teachers. Overall, both work concerns and teaching effectiveness were found to be at moderate levels. Among the dimensions of work concerns, Impact Concern was rated highest, while Task Concern received the lowest score. These suggest that teachers who are early in their careers may be motivated by a desire to make a broader impact, even as they struggle with task-related responsibilities. Similarly, Instructional Planning and Strategies received the highest ratings within the teaching effectiveness scale, while Assessment was the lowest, possibly reflecting confidence in teaching preparation but uncertainties in evaluating student performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Multicollinearity test</title>
<p>In this study, multicollinearity diagnostics were performed to assess the independence of predictor variables. All tolerance statistics in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref> surpassed 0.1, and the corresponding VIF values did not exceed 10, ranging from 2.049 to 3.200. These results suggest that multicollinearity is not a concern in this study, supporting the reliability and stability of the regression analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Shrestha, 2020</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Results of multicollinearity test.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Predictor variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Tolerance</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">VIF</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Self-concern</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.488</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.049</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Task concern</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.313</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Impact concern</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.441</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.270</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Instructional planning and strategies</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.397</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.522</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Assessment</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.369</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.708</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Learning environment</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.334</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.991</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Correlation analysis</title>
<p>The results of the correlation analysis in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab6">Table 6</xref> indicate a strong, positive, and statistically significant relationship between overall work concerns and overall teaching effectiveness (r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.783, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01). At the component level, all three dimensions of work concerns (self-concern, task-concern, and impact-concern) were positively and significantly correlated with each aspect of teaching effectiveness. Among them, task concern showed the strongest correlation with the learning environment (r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.750, p&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01), while impact concern had the highest association with assessment (r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.569, p&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation between work concerns and teaching effectiveness.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Work concerns component</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Overall teaching effectiveness</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Instructional planning and strategies</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Assessment</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Learning environment</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Overall work concerns</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.783&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Self-concern</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.477&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.513&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.543&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Task concern</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.559&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.547&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.750&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Impact concern</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.546&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.569&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.605&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>&#x002A;&#x002A;Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>These results indicate that higher level of work concerns, especially task and impact concerns, are more correlated with effective teaching practices such as planning, assessment, and classroom environment. This means that teachers who pay more attention to their daily tasks and school expectations are more likely to build a supportive learning environments. This supports earlier research that highlights how being clear about one&#x2019;s role and staying aware of daily responsibilities can lead to better teaching (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Almarode and Vandas, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Roksa et al., 2017</xref>). On the other hand, the correlation between self-concern and teacher effectiveness is weaker.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Structural equation model (SEM)</title>
<p>The structural equation model in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> illustrates the direct relationships among the latent constructs of Work Concern and teaching effectiveness, along with their respective observed variables. The three dimensions: Self-concern (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.74), Task Concern (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.82), and Impact Concern (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.79), which load strongly onto the latent variable Work Concern, indicating that all three are significant contributors to this construct. Work Concern shows a very strong direct effect on teaching effectiveness (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.95), suggesting that teachers who express higher concern levels related to their work also tend to perceive themselves as more effective in their roles. Teaching effectiveness is further reflected by three components: Instructional Planning and Strategies (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.72), Assessment (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.73), and Learning Environment (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.79), all of which show strong standardized loadings, confirming that these dimensions reliably represent the overall construct. Additionally, a moderate positive correlation (r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.39) exists between the latent variables of Work Concern and teaching effectiveness, further supporting the positive association between these two key constructs.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Structural equation model (SEM).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-16-1661379-g003.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">A structural equation model diagram showing relationships between variables. "Self Concern," "Task Concern," and "Impact Concern" affect "Work Concern," which influences "Teacher Effectiveness." Teacher effectiveness impacts "Instructional Planning and Strategies," "Assessment," and "Learning Environment." Arrows indicate direction and coefficients denote influence strength. Error terms e1 to e7 are shown for each variable.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The structural equation model demonstrated an excellent fit to the data shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab7">Table 7</xref>. The chi-square statistic was non-significant (&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;=&#x202F;9.316, df&#x202F;=&#x202F;7, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.231), and the ratio &#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>/df&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.331 fell well below the recommended threshold of 3. Goodness-of-fit indices were all above conventional cutoffs (GFI&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.992, AGFI&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.977, NFI&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.993, IFI&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.998, TLI&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.996, CFI&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.998), indicating strong model performance. The residual-based indices also supported a good fit, with RMSEA&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.028 (90% CI [0.000, 0.071], PCLOSE&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.759) and SRMR&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.011, both within acceptable limits. Collectively, these results confirm that the proposed model provides an excellent representation of the observed data.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab7">
<label>Table 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Structural equation model (SEM) fit.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Index</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">X<sup>2</sup>/df</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">AGFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">NFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">IFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">TLI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">CFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">RMSEA</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SRMR</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Statistical value</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.331</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.992</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.977</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.993</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.998</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.996</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.998</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.028</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Reference value</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.08</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Fit achieved</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">Yes</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The SEM analysis showed a good model fit and confirmed the hypothesized structural relationships. In this model, we can find that the three dimensions of work concern (self-concern, task-concern, and impact-concern) have a strong direct effect on teaching effectiveness. Each of the dimensions of teaching effectiveness (instructional planning and strategies, assessment, and learning environment) also showed strong loadings. These findings provide empirical validation of the conceptual framework. These results are similar to transformational and concern-based perspectives on professional growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Kyndt et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Toropova et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Wartenberg et al., 2023</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Nwoko et al. (2023)</xref> underscored the significance of work concerns in the private university sector, where job stability and workload concerns are prevalent.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>3.7</label>
<title>Multiple regression analysis</title>
<p>The multiple linear regression model in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab8">Table 8</xref> examined the influence of work concerns dimensions and demographic variables on teaching effectiveness across three components. The results showed that task concern and impact concern were consistently strong and significant predictors across all three domains: instructional planning and strategies, assessment, and the learning environment (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001). Specifically, task concern demonstrated the highest standardized beta (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.568, t&#x202F;=&#x202F;12.451&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;) in predicting the learning environment, highlighting its critical role. In contrast, self-concern showed a weaker and only marginally significant effect on instructional planning (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.105, t&#x202F;=&#x202F;2.026&#x002A;) and assessment (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.178, t&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.471&#x002A;&#x002A;), and a non-significant effect on the learning environment (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.042, t&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.982). Among demographic variables, working experience significantly influenced all three components, while gender showed a significant effect only on instructional planning. The models explained 39.4 to 59.8% of the variance in the dependent variables, with the highest explanatory power observed for the learning environment (Adjusted R<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.598, <italic>F</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;78.326&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab8">
<label>Table 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Multiple linear regression analysis for work concerns on teaching effectiveness.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th rowspan="2">Predictor variables</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Instructional planning and strategies</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Assessment</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Learning environment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>&#x03B2;</italic></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">t</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>&#x03B2;</italic></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">t</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>&#x03B2;</italic></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">t</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Gender</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.089</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.292&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.003</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.057</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.794</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Age</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.012</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.264</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.036</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.798</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.003</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.069</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Working experience</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.112</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.427&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.112</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.466&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.088</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.355&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Qualification</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.256</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.003</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.071</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.049</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.537</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Subject area</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.047</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.046</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.208</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.048</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Self-concern</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.105</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.026&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.178</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.471&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.042</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.982</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Task concern</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.274</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.895&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.196</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.543&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.568</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.451&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Impact concern</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.274</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.319&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.317</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.233&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.193</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.595&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">R<sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">0.405</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">0.421</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">0.606</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Adjusted R<sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">0.394</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">0.409</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">0.598</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">F</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">34.687&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">36.938&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">78.326&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>&#x002A;<italic>P</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01, &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The results of multiple regression further confirmed the predictive capacity of work concerns on teaching effectiveness. All three types of concern were significant predictors, with task concern emerging as the most consistent and influential factor across all dimensions of teaching effectiveness. This underscores the practical implication that helping young teachers develop task-related competencies, such as managing time, materials, and expectations, could substantially enhance their effectiveness. Impact concern also significantly predicted all aspects of effectiveness, reinforcing the idea that teachers who emphasize the impact of their work are more engaged in evaluating student progress and creating meaningful learning experiences. They actively seek ways to improve their teaching effectiveness, making them more adaptable to student needs. Contrary to some earlier assumptions, self-concern showed weaker and less consistent effects. Although it showed a significant predictive effect on instructional planning and assessment, it had no notable impact on the learning environment. This implies that personal anxieties or uncertainties may be less directly impact on how teachers manage their classrooms. The study confirms that work concerns are not simply emotional burdens and challenges but also key indicators and even possibly drivers of teaching effectiveness. In addition, The regression analysis shows that work concerns have a significant impact on teacher effectiveness (R<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.405&#x2013;0.606, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001), explaining between 40 and 60% of the variation of teacher effectiveness. However, a portion of the variance remains unexplained.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec21">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="sec22">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Level of work concerns of young teachers in Shandong&#x2019;s private universities</title>
<p>The results show that young teachers in Shandong&#x2019;s private universities generally have a moderate level of work concerns. They are aware of the challenges in their jobs, but these concerns are not overly negative. Among the different types, impact concern was the highest, which means they care deeply about how their work influences students&#x2019; learning and future success. This supports <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Day (2013)</xref> who found that university teachers often see themselves as playing an important role in shaping student outcomes. At the same time, self-concern was also quite strong, while task concern scored the lowest. This may be because many young teachers in private universities face job instability and limited promotion opportunities compared to those in public universities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Gu and Zhang, 2023</xref>). These conditions likely make them more focused on their personal career development and long-term stability.</p>
<p>These findings are consistent with earlier studies showing that early-career teachers tend to worry about job security and their impact on student success (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Skaalvik and Skaalvik, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Yang, 2023</xref>). The results also fit <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Fuller&#x2019;s (1969)</xref> Concern-Based Adoption Model (CBAM), which explains how teachers&#x2019; concerns usually shift from personal issues to teaching tasks, and finally to student outcomes. Interestingly, young teachers in this study already show a strong sense of responsibility for student learning, which may reflect their commitment to their work despite facing career uncertainties. To better support them, universities should offer clearer promotion pathways, professional development programs, and mentoring opportunities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Darling-Hammond, 2017</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec23">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Level of teaching effectiveness of young teachers in Shandong&#x2019;s private universities</title>
<p>The study found that young teachers in Shandong&#x2019;s private universities generally show a moderate level of teaching effectiveness. Among the three dimensions, Instructional Planning and Strategies scored the highest, followed by Learning Environment, while Assessment was the lowest. This suggests that most young teachers are confident in their ability to plan lessons and manage classroom, which is often emphasized in teacher training (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Darling-Hammond, 2017</xref>). However, they seem not skilled when it comes to student assessment because it requires deeper understanding and skills in both formative and summative evaluation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Black and Wiliam, 2018</xref>). These moderate results may also reflect the tough working conditions in private universities, where young teachers often face heavy workloads, short-term contracts, and fewer development opportunities compared to their peers in public universities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Liu, 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>These findings match previous studies showing that teacher effectiveness can vary in different dimensions and is often influenced by the work environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Gu and Zhang, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Stronge, 2018</xref>). Previous research in Chinese higher education also noted that young private university teachers tend to perform well in instructional strategies but often struggle with assessment and student engagement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Wen-ying and Xi, 2016</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Bandura and Wessels (1994)</xref>, teachers who have higher confidence are more likely to try new approaches and improve their teaching. For many young teachers, building self-efficacy and improving teaching effectiveness takes time and experience. Therefore, universities should provide targeted support, such as assessment training workshops, peer learning, and feedback systems, to help young teachers grow in areas where they feel less confident, especially in student assessment practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec24">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Relationship between work concerns and teaching effectiveness</title>
<p>The findings of this study show that teachers&#x2019; work concerns are closely related to their teaching effectiveness. Among the different stages of concerns, task concern had the strongest positive relationship with teaching effectiveness. This means that when teachers actively work on improving their lessons, getting students involved, and refining their teaching methods, they are likely to perform better (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">K&#x00F6;nig et al., 2024</xref>). Impact concern also showed a strong connection to effectiveness. Teachers who care about student success often seem more motivated and tend to teach better (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Liu, 2024</xref>). These results align with earlier studies that teachers who see their work as meaningful are often more committed and effective (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Buhl-Wiggers et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Kumar, 2023</xref>). On the other hand, self-concern had a weaker but still positive link to teaching effectiveness. Teachers who are mainly focused on personal concerns might not put as much energy into improving their teaching as those who are focused on student success (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Zhang et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>These results suggest that teachers in private universities seem to care more about improving their teaching and helping students than worrying about job security. This finding is different from some past studies, such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">G&#x00F3;mez-Dom&#x00ED;nguez et al. (2023)</xref>, who reported that job insecurity can lead to lower teacher engagement. In private universities, teachers seem more driven by their teaching responsibilities. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Harrison et al. (2023)</xref> also pointed out that teachers who put more effort into improving their teaching and assessment skills tend to feel more satisfied and effective. For private universities, this means creating a supportive work environment really matters. Leaders should offer clear career paths, reasonable workloads, and professional development opportunities to help reduce self-concerns. At the same time, leaders should strengthen task and impact concerns through mentorship, peer collaboration, and regular feedback because it can help teachers stay focused on improving their teaching. Building a culture where teachers feel their work could be valued is important too because it helps to improve teaching quality and student outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec25">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Predictive influence of work concerns on teaching effectiveness</title>
<p>Task concern had the strongest influence on teaching effectiveness, particularly in shaping the learning environment dimension. Impact concern also showed a strong positive effect, especially in assessment dimension. It means that teachers who are more concerned about their tasks and the impact of their teaching tend to be more effective, especially in creating supportive learning environments and improving student assessment practices. In contrast, self-concern had a weaker influence and was not significantly related to the learning environment dimension of teaching effectiveness. These findings are consistent with previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Boz and Cetin-Dindar, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Gul et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Sinclair, 2024</xref>), which suggest that teachers who concentrate on improving instruction and making a good learning environment are more effective in the classroom. This also supports <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Fuller&#x2019;s (1969)</xref> teacher development model, which indicates that early-career teachers often focus on task concerns because they can build their teaching confidence.</p>
<p>The weaker influence of self-concern compared to task and impact concerns may be partly explained by cultural and institutional factors in Chinese private universities. In China&#x2019;s collectivist context, teachers&#x2019; professional identity is shaped more by external expectations&#x2014;student results, institutional demands, and peer evaluations&#x2014;than by personal anxieties. In private universities, appraisal and promotion are also closely tied to student feedback and measurable outcomes, which leads teachers to prioritize tasks and impact over self-focused concerns. Practically, interventions should align with the areas where concerns most strongly predicted effectiveness. Since task concerns were most influential for the learning environment (R<sup>2</sup>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.606), support such as fair workload distribution and classroom resources is essential. Because impact concerns were tied to assessment, mentorship can focus on helping young teachers use assessment not just for grading but to enhance learning. These implications are directly linked to the observed results.</p>
<p>The regression results further show that work concerns can explain around 40 to 60% of the variation in teaching effectiveness across different dimensions. It means that teachers&#x2019; perceptions of their work, such as support, pressure, and their influence on students, play a key role in how they manage the classroom. However, not all teaching effectiveness can be explained by work concerns alone. There could be some other factors like school culture, leadership support, and collegial relationships also play an important role in teaching effectiveness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Gibbons, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Picaza et al., 2022</xref>). Future research may explore how other factors, such as institutional policies, leadership support, or teacher motivation, interact with work concerns to influence teacher effectiveness over time.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec26">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study investigates how work concerns shape professional growth by exploring their impact on teaching effectiveness among young lecturers in Chinese private universities. The findings show that task-concerns and impact-concerns have a much stronger influence on teaching effectiveness, while self-concerns have only a small effect. These results suggest that leaders in private universities should pay more attention to the work-related needs of young teachers because it can help to improve their teaching performance. This study provides empirical evidence that links work concerns to teaching effectiveness and gives a better understanding of teacher development in China&#x2019;s private university. There are also limitations in this study. The cross-sectional design and sample in only one province limit the generalizability of the results. Future research could consider longitudinal and multi-site studies that can validate and extend the findings.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec27">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec28">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Qingdao Hengxing University, China; the Ethics Committee of the Liaocheng University Dongchang College, China; the Ethics Committee of the Qingdao Qiushi College, China; the Ethics Committee of the Shandong Vocational and Technical University of Engineering, China. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec29">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>ML: Project administration, Validation, Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Software, Data curation. MA: Validation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. QW: Validation, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec30">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the participating private universities and the young teachers who generously contributed their time and insights to this research. We also acknowledge the valuable guidance provided by the academic supervisors and the support from Universiti Malaysia Sabah throughout the study.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec31">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec32">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec33">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Akram</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Development and validation of school teacher effectiveness questionnaire</article-title>. <source>J. Res. Reflect. Educ.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>154</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Akram</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abdelrady</surname><given-names>A. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Adwan</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramzan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Teachers' perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: a systematic review</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>920317</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35734463</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Almarode</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vandas</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <source>Clarity for learning: Five essential practices that empower students and teachers</source>. <publisher-loc>Thousand Oaks, CA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Corwin Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bandura</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wessels</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Self-efficacy</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Encyclopedia of human behavior</source>. ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Ramachandran</surname><given-names>V. S.</given-names></name></person-group>, vol. <volume>4</volume> (<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>71</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baumgartner</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weijters</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pieters</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The biasing effect of common method variance: some clarifications</article-title>. <source>J. Acad. Mark. Sci.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>221</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>235</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11747-020-00766-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bing</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The impact of higher education on high quality economic development in China: a digital perspective</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>e0289817</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0289817</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37556462</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Black</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wiliam</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Classroom assessment and pedagogy</article-title>. <source>Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &#x0026; Practice</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>551</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>575</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40917640</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boz</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cetin-Dindar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Teaching concerns, self-efficacy beliefs and constructivist learning environment of pre-service science teachers: a modelling study</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Teach. Educ.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>274</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>292</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02619768.2021.1919079</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buhl-Wiggers</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kerwin</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thornton</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <source>The impact of teacher effectiveness on student learning in Africa. IGC working paper S-89238-UGA-1. International growth Centre</source>. <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>World Bank</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burt</surname><given-names>E. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <source>Teacher instructional strategies impacting rural, high-poverty sStudent academic outcomes. Unpublished master's thesis</source>. <publisher-loc>Conway</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Coastal Carolina University</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Christopher</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Newman</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Exploring classroom practices associated with greater student engagement that may benefit low-income students in the early grades</article-title>. <source>Front. Educ.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>944731</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/feduc.2022.944731</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Darling-Hammond</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <source>Effective teacher professional development</source>. <publisher-loc>Palo Alto, CA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Learning Policy Institute</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Day</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>The new lives of teachers</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Back to the future</source>. ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Wragg</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Leiden, The Netherlands</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Brill</publisher-name>), <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Engida</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iyasu</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fentie</surname><given-names>Y. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Impact of teaching quality on student achievement: student evidence</article-title>. <source>Front. Educ.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>1367317</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/feduc.2024.1367317</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fischer</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCoy</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Foster</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eisenkraft</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lawrenz</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Use of the stages of concern questionnaire in a national top-down reform effort</article-title>. <source>Teach. Teach. Educ.</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fuller</surname><given-names>F. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1969</year>). <article-title>Concerns of teachers: a developmental conceptualization</article-title>. <source>Am. Educ. Res. J.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>226</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3102/00028312006002207</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>George</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hall</surname><given-names>G. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stiegelbauer</surname><given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Litke</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <source>Stages of concern questionnaire</source>. <publisher-loc>Austin, TX</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Southwest educational development laboratory</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gibbons</surname><given-names>T. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <source>Workplace factors that contribute to teacher intent to leave the profession</source>. <publisher-loc>Conway</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Coastal Carolina University</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>G&#x00F3;mez-Dom&#x00ED;nguez</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Navarro-Mateu</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x00F3;mez-Dom&#x00ED;nguez</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gim&#x00E9;nez-Espert</surname><given-names>M. d. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>How much do we care about teacher job insecurity during the pandemic? A bibliometric review</article-title>. <source>Front. Public Health</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>1098013</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpubh.2023.1098013</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36844865</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Study on the relationship between the professional identity and the work engagement of teachers in private universities</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Stud.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>562</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>569</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.53894/ijirss.v6i3.1594</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gul</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yousaf</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Masood</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yaqub</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Relationship between teachers' professional development, instructional strategies and its impact on students' learning outcomes</article-title>. <source>Ilkogretim Online</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>336</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>348</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17051/ilkonline.2020.04.764919</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hall</surname><given-names>G. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hord</surname><given-names>S. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source>Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes</source>. <edition>5th</edition> Edn. <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Pearson</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harrison</surname><given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>King</surname><given-names>R. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Satisfied teachers are good teachers: the association between teacher job satisfaction and instructional quality</article-title>. <source>Br. Educ. Res. J.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>476</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>498</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/berj.3793</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hatem</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeidan</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goossens</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moreira</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Normality testing methods and the importance of skewness and kurtosis in statistical analysis</article-title>. <source>BAU J. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>7</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54729/KTPE9512</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Howell</surname><given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nassel</surname><given-names>A. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Agne</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cherrington</surname><given-names>A. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Area based stratified random sampling using geospatial technology in a community-based survey</article-title>. <source>BMC Public Health</source> <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>1678</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12889-020-09793-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33167956</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>K&#x00F6;nig</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heine</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kramer</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weyers</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Becker-Mrotzek</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gro&#x00DF;schedl</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Teacher education effectiveness as an emerging research paradigm: a synthesis of reviews of empirical studies published over three decades (1993-2023)</article-title>. <source>J. Curric. Stud.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>371</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>391</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00220272.2023.2171308</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krejcie</surname><given-names>R. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morgan</surname><given-names>D. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1970</year>). <article-title>Determining sample size for research activities</article-title>. <source>Educ. Psychol. Meas.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>607</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>610</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/001316447003000308</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Influence of motivation on teachers' job performance</article-title>. <source>Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1057/s41599-023-01683-x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kyndt</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gijbels</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grosemans</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Donche</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Teachers' everyday professional development: mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes</article-title>. <source>Rev. Educ. Res.</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>1111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1150</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3102/0034654315627865</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Distance higher education and regional equality in China</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Educ.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>273</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>288</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ejed.12502</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Opportunities and challenges for private education in China: a review of the latest policy revisions</article-title>. <source>ECNU Rev. Educ.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>141</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>154</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/20965311221120829</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effect of teacher-student relationship on academic engagement: the mediating roles of perceived social support and academic pressure</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>1331667</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1331667</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38966726</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jungyin</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jaewoo</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heechul</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shah</surname><given-names>W. U. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Evaluating the efficiency, productivity change, and technology gaps of China's provincial higher education systems: a comprehensive analytical framework</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>e0294902</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0294902</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38241214</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mendez</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Corpuz</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Comon</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Teachers' well-being and instructional efficacy: basis for professional development plan</article-title>. <source>European Modern Studies Journal</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>26</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.59573/emsj.8(4).2024.2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nwoko</surname><given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Emeto</surname><given-names>T. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Malau-Aduli</surname><given-names>A. E. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Malau-Aduli</surname><given-names>B. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>A systematic review of the factors that influence teachers' occupational wellbeing</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</source> <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>6070</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph20126070</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37372657</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Picaza</surname><given-names>R. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geroche</surname><given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gindap</surname><given-names>R. A. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Regression analysis on perceived stressors and teaching practices of teachers towards teaching performance</article-title>. <source>&#x0130;lk&#x00F6;&#x011F;retim Online</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>68</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>75</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54476/ioer-imrj/412120</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roksa</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trolian</surname><given-names>T. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blaich</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wise</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Facilitating academic performance in college: understanding the role of clear and organized instruction</article-title>. <source>High. Educ.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>283</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>300</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10734-016-0048-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sabharwal</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miah</surname><given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Evaluating teachers' effectiveness in classrooms: an ML-based assessment portfolio</article-title>. <source>Soc. Netw. Anal. Min.</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>28</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13278-024-01719-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schober</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boer</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwarte</surname><given-names>L. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation</article-title>. <source>Anesth. Analg.</source> <volume>126</volume>, <fpage>1763</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1768</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1213/ane.0000000000002864</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29481436</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shrestha</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Detecting multicollinearity in regression analysis</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Appl. Math. Stat.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12691/ajams-8-2-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sinclair</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <source>Effective classroom management practices and the training needs for beginning educators (Master's thesis)</source>. <publisher-loc>San Rafael, CA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Dominican University of California</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Skaalvik</surname><given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skaalvik</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Teacher stress and teacher self-efficacy: relations and consequences</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Educator stress: An occupational health perspective</source> (<publisher-loc>Cham, Switzerland</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-52887-5_5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stronge</surname></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <source>Qualities of effective teachers</source>. <edition>3rd</edition> Edn. <publisher-loc>Alexandria, VA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>ASCD</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Toropova</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Myrberg</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johansson</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Teacher job satisfaction: the importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics</article-title>. <source>Educ. Rev.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>71</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>97</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00131911.2020.1789737</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walugembe</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ntayi</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olupot</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elasu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Adaptive behaviors in education institutions before and after COVID-19: a systematic literature review</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>1017321</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017321</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36507021</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Analysis on the differences between the private school in China and in Western countries</article-title>. <source>Modern Education Research</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2991/assehr.k.211220.090</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wartenberg</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aldrup</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grund</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klusmann</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Satisfied and high performing? A meta-analysis and systematic review of the correlates of teachers' job satisfaction</article-title>. <source>Educ. Psychol. Rev.</source> <volume>35</volume>:<fpage>114</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10648-023-09889-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wen-ying</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xi</surname><given-names>L. I. U.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A new view on teaching motivation&#x2014;self-determination theory</article-title>. <source>Sino-US English Teaching</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17265/1539-8072/2016.01.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Digital transformation in top Chinese universities: an analysis of their 14th five-year development plans (2021-2025)</article-title>. <source>Asian J. Distance Educ.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>186</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>201</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <source>Teacher retention in a southern China private school: A phenomenological study</source>. <publisher-loc>Dallas, TX</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Dallas Baptist University</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lo</surname><given-names>L. N. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Reform of teacher education in China: a survey of policies for systemic change</article-title>. <source>Teach. Teach.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>757</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>781</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/13540602.2019.1682005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effect of teachers' teaching strategies on students' learning engagement: moderated mediation model</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>1475048</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1475048</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39691665</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Workplace anxiety leading to job burnout among young and middle-aged university lecturers: mechanism and mitigation strategies</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>1495718</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1495718</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39834769</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zoromski</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Evans</surname><given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Owens</surname><given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holdaway</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Royo Romero</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Middle school teachers' perceptions and use of classroom management strategies and associations with student behavior</article-title>. <source>J. Emot. Behav. Disord.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>199</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>212</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1063426621994972</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>