Front. Psychol. Frontiers in Psychology Front. Psychol. 1664-1078 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1652330 Psychology Correction Correction: Buyers, maybe moving second is not that bad after all: low-power, anxiety, and making inferior first offers Maaravi Yossi 1 * Heller Ben 2 1The Adelson School of Entrepreneurship, Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya, Israel 2Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya, Israel

Edited and reviewed by: Leonardo Carlucci, University of Foggia, Italy

 *Correspondence: Yossi Maaravi myossi@runi.ac.il 29 07 2025 2025 16 1652330 23 06 2025 30 06 2025 Copyright © 2025 Maaravi and Heller. 2025 Maaravi and Heller

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on Buyers, maybe moving second is not that bad after all: low-power, anxiety, and making inferior first offers by Maaravi, Y., and Heller, B. (2021). Front. Psychol. 12:677653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.677653 first offer power BATNA negotiation first-mover advantage second-mover advantage anchoring and adjustment section-at-acceptance Personality and Social Psychology

In the published article, there was an error in the text. Two p-values were rounded to two decimal places (instead of three) and consequently reported as statistically significant.

A correction has been made to Study 1, Results, Paragraph 2.

This sentence previously stated:

“In the second step of the analysis, the interaction between anxiety and power was entered revealing a significant effect (β = −0.16, B = −129.4, t = −1.94, p = 0.05) which explained a significant increase in variance in first offer, ΔR2 = 0.026, F(1, 107) = 3.77, p = 0.05.”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“In the second step of the analysis, the interaction between anxiety and power was entered, revealing a trend in the expected direction that fell short of statistical significance (β = −0.16, B = −129.4, t = −1.94, p = 0.055). The increase in variance in first offer [ΔR2 = 0.026, F(1,107) = 3.77, p = 0.055] shows a similar trend that did not reach statistical significance.”

Additionally, the correspondence email address as published has been amended. Instead of “myossi@idc.ac.il” it should be “myossi@runi.ac.il”.

The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.