<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Psychol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Psychology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Psychol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-1078</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1533785</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Psychology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Self-selected vs. prescribed aerobic exercise intensity: impacts on pleasure in women with obesity</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Da Silva</surname> <given-names>Carlos Eduardo Rosa</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Santana</surname> <given-names>Wilian Jesus</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2797330/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Almeida</surname> <given-names>Gustavo</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1519393/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Verame</surname> <given-names>Adriano</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2961316/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Doro</surname> <given-names>Antonio Roberto</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2957156/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Barbosa</surname> <given-names>Eduardo</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2961080/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lima</surname> <given-names>Leonardo</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2961112/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Dias</surname> <given-names>Helton Magalh&#x00E3;es</given-names></name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zanetti</surname> <given-names>Marcelo Callegari</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2961025/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Junior</surname> <given-names>Aylton Figueira</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2389473/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>GETAFIS - S&#x00E3;o Judas Tadeu University</institution>, <addr-line>S&#x00E3;o Paulo</addr-line>, <country>Brazil</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: Aleksandra Maria Rogowska, University of Opole, Poland</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: Pedro Forte, Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of the Douro, Portugal</p>
<p>Rafael Peixoto, Instituto Superior de Ci&#x00EA;ncias Educativas, Portugal</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Carlos Eduardo Rosa Da Silva, <email>silva_personal@hotmail.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>07</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1533785</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>24</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>23</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Da Silva, Santana, Almeida, Verame, Doro, Barbosa, Lima, Dias, Zanetti and Junior.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Da Silva, Santana, Almeida, Verame, Doro, Barbosa, Lima, Dias, Zanetti and Junior</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="sec1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Self-selection of aerobic training intensity is an approach that allows practitioners to develop autonomy (choice of pace), improve physical fitness, and contribute to better affective responses and training adherence. However, it is still unclear whether self-selection of training intensity in group settings is comparable to individual training conditions. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of three aerobic training protocols on psychophysiological responses in physically inactive adult obese women.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2">
<title>Methods</title>
<p>The sample consisted of 90 women with a mean age of 48.3&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;5.5&#x202F;years and BMI of 31.2&#x202F;&#x00B1;&#x202F;4.8&#x202F;kg/m<sup>2</sup>, who participated in three treadmill aerobic training protocols: 1- Control group (IPI) with individually prescribed intensity (64 to 76% of HRmax), 2- Small group (SGS) with self-selected intensity, and 3- Individual with self-selected intensity (ISS). Heart rate (HR), total session volume (VL), affective valence was determined by feeling scale (FS), enjoyment was determined by Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES), intention to repeat the exercise session (INT), and Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction Scale (BPNFS) were evaluated. Statistical analyses were conducted using two-way ANOVA for HR and FS, and one-way ANOVA for VL, PACES, INT, and BPNFS with Tukey <italic>post hoc</italic> test and significance criteria (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x202F;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Results</title>
<p>The results showed that HR and VL were similar (<italic>p</italic> &#x003E;&#x202F;0.05) between the protocols IPI, SGS and ISS, while FS, PACES, and INT were significantly higher in SGS and ISS than IPI protocols (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). BPNFS also presented better results for the SGS and ISS protocols (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x202F;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>These findings suggest that the intensity and training volume were similar among different protocols. Affective responses were more positive perceived in SGS and ISS protocols.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>We conclude that intensity self-selection is a safe, effective, and comparable strategy to prescribed intensity at moderate levels, providing a more enjoyable experience that may contribute to greater adherence to aerobic training.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>psychophysiological responses</kwd>
<kwd>enjoyment</kwd>
<kwd>motivation</kwd>
<kwd>physical activity</kwd>
<kwd>small group training</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="8"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="81"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="12721"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Movement Science</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec6">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Aerobic training has been recommended to reduce overweight and obesity as risk factors for, metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, as well some types of cancer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Shilton et al., 2024</xref>). Overweight and obesity subjects have a 6-fold higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes and 3-fold higher risk of developing cardiovascular diseases compared to normal weight adults (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref81">Zhang et al., 2024</xref>). On the other hand, healthy lifestyle based on regular physical activity/exercise reduce overweight and obesity associated risks over 25 chronic diseases(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref81">Zhang et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Khan et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Hruby and Hu, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Bl&#x00FC;her, 2019</xref>), contribute to healthier aging (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Shilton et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Stafie et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Albini et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Elagizi et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref80">Yang and Petrini, 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Physical inactivity contributes to the development of overweight and obesity, and negatively impact on health and quality of life (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Almeida et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Sacramento et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Guthold et al., 2020</xref>). Globally, 7.2% of cardiovascular disease and 7.6% all-cause mortality are attributable to physical inactivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Katzmarzyk et al., 2022</xref>). Psychophysiological determinants, such as motivation and physical limitations, are significant barriers to physical activity practice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Azizan and Fadzil, 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>Adherence to exercise programs in fitness centers has shown drop out between 40 and 70% of new participants within 3&#x2013;6 months after starting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Sperandei et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Gjestvang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Gjestvang et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Gjestvang et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Gjestvang et al., 2023</xref>). It suggests that current strategies to engagement have not been effective in addressing behavioral demands, as lack of intrinsic motivation, absence of personalized support, and enjoyment perception in training sessions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Sperandei et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Gjestvang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Gjestvang et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Gjestvang et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Gjestvang et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Clavel San Emeterio et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Faro et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Rodrigues et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Traditional exercise prescription models, as outlined in the guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>), prioritize safety and effectiveness but often fail to ensure long-term adherence. This has led to the proposal of a tripartite model that incorporates more enjoyable exercise doses to enhance engagement and promote greater future participation in training sessions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Ladwig et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Ekkekakis and Tiller, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Ekkekakis, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Teixeira et al., 2012</xref>). Emotional factors, such as enjoyment during and after exercise and the satisfaction of achieving goals, are crucial motivators (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Wienke and Jekauc, 2016</xref>), highlighting the need for strategies that foster positive emotional experiences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Rodrigues et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Ladwig et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Teixeira et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Wienke and Jekauc, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Rodrigues et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">Teixeira et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Ekkekakis et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref76">Williams et al., 2016</xref>). The Dual-Mode Theory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Ekkekakis, 2009</xref>) explains affective responses during aerobic exercise through two systems: automatic perception and cognitive control. As intensity increases beyond the ventilatory threshold, pleasure generally decreases. Positive affective responses can improve adherence, while negative experiences, such as discomfort, may lead to dropout (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Williams, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Ekkekakis and Lind, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Parfitt et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Hall et al., 2005</xref>).</p>
<p>Affective responses, whether pleasurable or discomforting, are central to the motivation for physical exercise. Behaviors with a greater perception of pleasure are more likely to be repeated, while displeasure may discourage engagement. Aerobic exercise intensities that generate positive emotions can contribute to greater adherence, whereas excessive effort or displeasure may lead to dropout. Therefore, exercise prescriptions should consider not only physiological benefits but also emotional responses, as these influence the decision to continue or discontinue training (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Ladwig et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ekkekakis, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Ekkekakis and Petruzzello, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Rhodes and Kates, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Williams and Evans, 2014</xref>). Affective valence, the spectrum of feelings ranging from pleasure to displeasure during activity, spans sensations that can enhance participation to those that discourage engagement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Russell, 2003</xref>). Emotions influence behavior through feedback, automaticity, and reflection; understanding these mechanisms is essential to comprehending how emotions can impact long-term adherence to physical exercise (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Baumeister et al., 2007</xref>).</p>
<p>Positive social interactions and a supportive environment are crucial for promoting adherence to training programs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Gjestvang et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Gjestvang et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Gjestvang et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Gabay and Oravitan, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref79">Withall et al., 2022</xref>). Small group exercise, a trend in fitness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Martinez Kercher et al., 2022</xref>), can enhance socialization and motivation, fostering a sense of community, as explained by Self-Determination Theory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Martinez Kercher et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Wayment and McDonald, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Spink et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Golaszewski et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>). This theory identifies three psychological needs&#x2014;autonomy, competence, and relatedness&#x2014;as key elements of motivation. Autonomy, supported by self-selected exercise intensity, increases the sense of control and can improve affective responses, such as the perception of pleasure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Ekkekakis and Lind, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Parfitt et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Ntoumanis et al., 2021</xref>). Together, these factors may influence the long-term maintenance of physical exercise practice, as individuals are more likely to continue activities aligned with their preferences and abilities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Williams and Evans, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Ekkekakis et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Lind et al., 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>Self-selected intensity promotes greater autonomy, allowing individuals to adjust their effort to align with their preferences. This approach is generally associated with more positive affective responses, such as enhanced pleasure and well-being (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Parfitt et al., 2006</xref>). Self-selected intensity in aerobic training is effective in improving physiological and psychological aspects in different populations, such as obese women, adolescents and physically inactive older adults (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref80">Yang and Petrini, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Barros et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Alves et al., 2022</xref>). Physiological and psychological responses, including the perception of pleasure, in women with overweight or obesity during physical exercise is crucial for understanding the factors that influence adherence and motivation within this population.</p>
<p>Although previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Ekkekakis, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Ekkekakis and Lind, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Lind et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Ekkekakis et al., 2006</xref>) have investigated the differences between self-selected and prescribed exercise intensities, no prior research has compared self-selected protocols in small groups with individually prescribed ones, highlighting a significant gap in the literature.</p>
<p>The purpose of the present study is to compare the psychophysiological responses of overweight and obese women during aerobic training prescribed using two different methods: (A) prescribed intensities and (B) self-selected intensities, both in individual and small group settings. The primary hypothesis is that the intensity and training volume in prescribed group protocols will be similar to those in self-selected group protocols, both in individual and small group contexts. The secondary hypothesis is that self-selected intensity protocols will elicit more positive affective responses, such as higher affective valence, greater enjoyment, and increased intention to repeat exercise sessions, consistent with hedonic theory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ekkekakis, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Kahneman, 1999</xref>), which suggests that more pleasurable behaviors are more likely to be repeated. Additionally, it is expected that self-selected intensity groups will promote a greater perception of autonomy compared to the prescribed intensity group, as the possibility of choice is a central component of satisfying the need for autonomy, according to Self-Determination Theory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>). Small group training is anticipated to promote a greater perception of relatedness compared to other groups, addressing the need for social connection and mutual support, while the perception of competence is expected to be similar across groups, as it relates to participants&#x2019; ability to accomplish the proposed tasks, aligning with the psychological need to feel effective and capable in their efforts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>). These connections to basic psychological needs may explain how different protocols influence motivation and contribute to more positive experiences in aerobic exercise practice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Rodrigues et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ekkekakis, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Rhodes and Kates, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Ekkekakis et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Lind et al., 2005</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods" id="sec7">
<label>2</label>
<title>Methods</title>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Study design</title>
<p>A single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted, involving three experimental groups. All training sessions were standardized and conducted between 8:00&#x202F;AM and 12:00&#x202F;PM under identical conditions, overseen by the same evaluator, and performed in a temperature-controlled environment set at 23&#x00B0;C.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Subjects</title>
<p>Eligible participants were women aged 40 to 65&#x202F;years who were apparently healthy, had no contraindications to physical exercise, and had not engaged in structured physical activity or sports within the past 12&#x202F;months. Exclusion criteria included high-risk cardiovascular disease stratification, as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>), and/or hypertension (blood pressure&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;130/80&#x202F;mmHg) measured prior to the intervention. The selection of women as the population in the present study is justified by their greater vulnerability to physical inactivity, and health risks related to overweight and obesity, which requires specific interventions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Guthold et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Strain et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Mayo et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Mielke et al., 2018</xref>). Participants were recruited via social media platforms (Instagram and Facebook) through informational videos highlighting the health benefits of exercise. Eligibility criteria included physical activity levels below 150&#x202F;min per week (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Matsudo et al., 2001</xref>) and a body mass index (BMI) greater than 25&#x202F;kg/m<sup>2</sup>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Interventions</title>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>2.3.1</label>
<title>Pre-exercise evaluation and exercise program</title>
<p>Data collection was conducted over multiple sessions. On the first session, body mass (kg) and height (cm) were measured using a Sanny BL201PP digital scale with an integrated stadiometer, and resting blood pressure was assessed using an OMROM 7122 arm blood pressure monitor. Participants were familiarized with the treadmill (MOVEMENT RT-250 model) and psychometric instruments, and completed a physical activity risk screening questionnaire (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Thomas et al., 1992</xref>), and provided all necessary medical authorizations.</p>
<p>The study was conducted using a treadmill to provide a more rigorous control of variables such as intensity and volume, ensuring consistency across sessions. Additionally, the treadmill allowed for standardized conditions that facilitated the collection of psychometric scales during the protocol, minimizing external influences and enhancing the reliability of the measurements. This controlled environment ensured precise monitoring and evaluation of the participants&#x2019; responses throughout the exercise session.</p>
<p>During the second session, an incremental treadmill test was performed to determine maximum heart rate and to calculate training zone percentages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Ellestad et al., 1969</xref>). Participants were then randomized and allocated into three experimental groups. The third session was dedicated to the implementation of the aerobic training protocols, as outlined in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>CONSORT flow diagram.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-16-1533785-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Upon arrival at the laboratory, each participant remained seated for 10&#x202F;min in silence, avoiding verbal or visual interaction with others, and refrained from using mobile phones or electronic devices prior to the test. The psychometric scales and questionnaires were thoroughly explained and reviewed to ensure the reliability and reproducibility of the measurements.</p>
<p>This study evaluated three distinct aerobic training protocols: (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Shilton et al., 2024</xref>) Individual with Prescribed Intensity (IPI), corresponding to 64&#x2013;76% HRmax as recommended by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) for improving cardiorespiratory fitness in sedentary individuals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref81">Zhang et al., 2024</xref>) Individual with Self-Selected Intensity (ISS); and (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Khan et al., 2018</xref>) Small Group with Self-Selected Intensity (SGS).</p>
<p>In the IPI protocol, participants performed 30&#x202F;min of aerobic exercise on a treadmill at a prescribed intensity of 64&#x2013;76% HRmax. This intensity range is classified as moderate and sufficient for enhancing cardiorespiratory fitness, according to ACSM guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>). The training was conducted in a controlled environment, with the participant and the researcher only.</p>
<p>In the ISS protocol, participants performed 30&#x202F;min of aerobic exercise on a treadmill at an intensity they self-selected. The treadmill speed was determined autonomously by each participant, who adjusted the pace as they deemed appropriate to complete the session. Participants could increase or decrease the speed at any point during the training, and the session was conducted in the presence of the participant and the researcher only.</p>
<p>The SGS protocol involved three participants performing 30&#x202F;min of aerobic exercise simultaneously on individual treadmills. Each participant chose their training intensity, maintaining a pace they considered comfortable. The treadmills were positioned to prevent participants from viewing each other&#x2019;s control panels, thereby minimizing external influence on individual intensity selection.</p>
<p>For the ISS and SGS protocols, participants were instructed using the standardized phrase: <italic>&#x201C;Choose the pace you believe is appropriate to complete 30&#x202F;min of physical exercise on the treadmill.&#x201D;</italic> In both protocols, participants were explicitly instructed to do not verbalize their ratings on psychometric scales to prevent influencing one another. Instead, they pointed to and selected values independently.</p>
<p>The ISS and SGS protocols were designed to enhance the participants&#x2019; affective experiences by allowing self-selected intensities. In the SGS group, participants were encouraged to engage in conversation during the training about any topic, fostering social interaction as a strategy to improve the affective experience during exercise (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Teixeira et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Ntoumanis et al., 2021</xref>). Conversations included perceptions and feelings about the exercise session and individual pace choices.</p>
<p>The IPI adhered to standard guidelines as prescribed by the ACSM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>). Participants in all groups were blinded to the specific objectives of the study, particularly regarding the potential impact of the instructions on their affective experiences. The description of parameters such as intensity, environment and participants are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Description of the characteristics of each protocol.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>N</italic>
</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Intensity</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Duration</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Environment</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Participants</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">IPI</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">64&#x2013;76% HRm&#x00E1;x</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30&#x202F;min</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Individual</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SGS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Self-selected</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30&#x202F;min</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Small group</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">ISS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Self-selected</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30&#x202F;min</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Individual</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>IPI, Group with prescribed intensity (64&#x2013;76% HRmax) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>); SGS, Small Group with self-selected intensity; ISS, Individual Group with self-selected intensity. N, Number of participants in each group.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The differences in protocol lie in the need to evaluate how self-selected intensity, could promote greater autonomy and pleasure, and impact on psychophysiological and affective responses compared to prescribed intensity, especially in populations more vulnerable to physical inactivity, such as women with obesity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Randomization</title>
<p>Given the continuous recruitment design of the study, a simple randomization procedure was employed. Participants were blinded to their group allocation and the specific characteristics of the interventions being compared. Randomization was carried out by researchers CERS and AFJ, who were the only team members directly responsible for implementing the exercise interventions and, consequently, aware of each participant&#x2019;s group assignment. The researchers responsible for data screening and statistical analysis had no contact with the participants and remained blinded to group allocations throughout the study. Participants were randomized into three groups: IPI &#x2013; Prescribed Intensity (64&#x2013;76% HRmax, n&#x202F;=&#x202F;30), Individual with Self-Selected Intensity (ISS, n&#x202F;=&#x202F;30), and Small Group with Self-Selected Intensity (SGS, n&#x202F;=&#x202F;30). The process of randomization was carried out randomly, ensuring unbiased allocation of participants across the three groups. Given the homogeneity of the sample characteristics, such as BMI and age, the randomization process resulted in comparable baseline attributes among the groups. This methodological approach minimized potential confounding factors, ensuring that the observed differences in outcomes could be attributed to the intervention protocols rather than pre-existing disparities between the groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Evaluation time points of the exercise session</title>
<p>The variables of interest were assessed before, during, and after each exercise session across all groups.</p>
<p>In all protocols, heart rate (HR) was continuously monitored throughout the training session. The Feeling Scale (FS) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Guthold et al., 2018</xref>) was administered five times: at rest, at the 5th, 15th, and 25th minutes of the session, and 15&#x202F;min post-training. Following the completion of each protocol, participants remained seated for 15&#x202F;min during the recovery period. During this time, the FS, the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Strain et al., 2024</xref>), and the Intention to Repeat the Exercise Session Scale (INT) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Mayo et al., 2019</xref>) were applied, in accordance with established guidelines for aerobic exercise analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Mielke et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Psychometric assessments were conducted without verbal expression of perceptions to minimize interference with interpersonal decision-making processes, such as vicarious experience, fear of external judgment, or anxiety.</p>
<p>Volume load (VL) was recorded at the end of each protocol.</p>
<p>Data collection followed the experimental procedures outlined in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Experimental design of the study in different aerobic training protocols. HR, Heart rate (bpm); FS, Feeling Scale; PACES, Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale; INT, Intention to Repeat the Exercise Session Scale; VL, total session volume; BPNSFS, Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Frustration Scale.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-16-1533785-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Affective responses during exercise may vary, in obese individuals potentially experiencing more positive feelings when the exercise is adapted to their preferences and abilities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Freitas et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Instruments</title>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>2.6.1</label>
<title>Heart rate</title>
<p>Heart rate was monitored continuously throughout the entire protocol using the POLAR H7 heart rate monitor, connected via Bluetooth to the POLAR TEAM app. Relative intensity was calculated based on each participant&#x2019;s maximum heart rate (HRmax), determined through an incremental treadmill test (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Ellestad et al., 1969</xref>). HR measurements were recorded at five time points: at rest, at the 5th, 15th, and 25th minutes during the protocol, and 15&#x202F;min post-protocol.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>2.6.2</label>
<title>Feeling scale</title>
<p>The affective valence response to exercise was assessed using the Feeling Scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Hardy and Rejeski, 1989</xref>), an 11-point bipolar scale ranging from +5 (&#x201C;very good&#x201D;) to &#x2212;5 (&#x201C;very bad&#x201D;), reflecting pleasure and displeasure, respectively. At the beginning of each protocol, participants were instructed: <italic>&#x201C;Some individuals experience pleasure during exercise, while others experience displeasure. This perception is individual. How do you evaluate your perception of pleasure or displeasure at this moment in the exercise?&#x201D;</italic> Measurements were taken at five time points: at rest, at the 5th, 15th, and 25th minutes during the protocol, and 15&#x202F;min post-protocol, resulting in a total of five measurements per protocol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Ekkekakis et al., 2023</xref>). The FS is closely associated with Hedonic Theory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ekkekakis, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Ekkekakis et al., 2006</xref>), which suggests that individuals are more likely to engage in behaviors that enhance pleasure and reduce discomfort. In the context of exercise, the affective valence assessed by the FS facilitates the identification of intensities and conditions that promote positive affective experiences. This information is particularly valuable for designing individualized exercise prescriptions, especially for vulnerable populations, such as obese and physically inactive women, who may exhibit heightened sensitivity to discomfort during physical activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>2.6.3</label>
<title>Physical activity enjoyment scale</title>
<p>The Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale is an 18-item instrument designed to assess enjoyment during exercise or physical activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Kendzierski and DeCarlo, 1991</xref>). It includes 12 negatively worded items and 6 positively worded items, with responses rated on a 1&#x2013;7 bipolar scale. Participants were instructed: <italic>&#x201C;How do you feel right now regarding the exercise or physical activity?&#x201D;</italic> Data collection occurred at the conclusion of each protocol. This instrument is based on the Hedonic Theory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ekkekakis, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Ekkekakis et al., 2006</xref>), which suggests that individuals are more likely to repeat behaviors that maximize pleasure and minimize discomfort, thus enabling the identification of practices that foster positive experiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>2.6.4</label>
<title>Intention to repeat the exercise session scale</title>
<p>Participants&#x2019; intention to engage in future exercise during the following week was assessed using a 2-item scale, adapted from previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Jung et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Kwan and Bryan, 2010</xref>) and translated into Portuguese (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Gomes and Capel&#x00E3;o, 2013</xref>). The scale included the question: <italic>&#x201C;I intend to perform this exercise I did today at least three times next week.&#x201D;</italic> Responses were recorded on a 7-point Likert scale, with anchors ranging from 1&#x2013;<italic>&#x201C;very unlikely&#x201D;</italic> to 7&#x2013;<italic>&#x201C;very likely.&#x201D;</italic> The scale was administered at the conclusion of each protocol. The hedonic theory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ekkekakis, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Kahneman, 1999</xref>) suggests that more pleasurable behaviors are more likely to be repeated. The use of the scale allows for assessing how positive or negative experiences during the exercise session influence the intention to continue.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>2.6.5</label>
<title>Basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration scale</title>
<p>Basic psychological needs&#x2014;Autonomy, Relatedness, and Competence&#x2014;were assessed using the Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Murphy et al., 2022</xref>). The scale consists of 24 items, equally distributed among the three constructs and their satisfaction and frustration dimensions. Each item is rated on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), yielding scores ranging from 6 to 30 for each need, based on the number of items. This instrument enables the investigation of how the fulfillment of basic psychological needs, as outlined in Self-Determination Theory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>), may mediate affective responses during exercise, thereby enhancing pleasure and promoting long-term adherence to training programs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>2.6.6</label>
<title>Volume load</title>
<p>At the end of each protocol, the total distance covered was recorded to characterize the volume load of the training session.</p>
<p>The present study did not assess training adherence, as it employed a cross-sectional design that examined psychophysiological responses during a single acute aerobic training session. While the study offers insights into psychological variables, it merely hypothesizes their potential association with long-term adherence. Further longitudinal studies are required to establish how these variables influence sustained engagement in exercise programs.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Sample size was calculated <italic>a priori</italic> using G&#x002A;Power (v.3.1.9.7) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Faul et al., 2009</xref>). A split-plot ANOVA (2 groups &#x00D7; 5 time points) was performed. Assuming an effect size of <italic>f</italic> =&#x202F;0.25 for the interaction, with <italic>&#x03B1;</italic> =&#x202F;0.05, statistical power of 1 &#x2013; <italic>&#x03B2;</italic> =&#x202F;0.95, a correlation between repeated measurements of r&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.50, and a violation of sphericity (<italic>&#x03B5;</italic> =&#x202F;1), a total sample size of 39 participants (13 per group) was required. Changes in percentage (<italic>&#x0394;</italic>%) were used to assess differences between group means.</p>
<p>After initial data screening, descriptive analyses (means and standard deviations) and Levene&#x2019;s test for data normality were performed.</p>
<p>For subsequent analyses, SPSS 25.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) and GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 (263) were used for graph construction.</p>
<p>HR and FS variables were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA (3 groups &#x00D7; 5 time points). The PACES, INT, and BPNSFS variables were evaluated using one-way ANOVA. When violations of sphericity were detected (i.e., for analyses involving more than two time points for the within-subjects factor), Greenhouse&#x2013;Geisser corrections were applied to the degrees of freedom. For significant main effects and interactions, the Tukey <italic>post hoc</italic> test was performed with a significance level set at <italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x202F;0.05. Eta-squared (&#x03B7;<sup>2</sup>) effect sizes were calculated and interpreted following Cohen&#x2019;s guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Cohen, 1988</xref>), with &#x201C;small&#x201D; (0.01), &#x201C;medium&#x201D; (0.06), and &#x201C;large&#x201D; (0.14) effect size thresholds. Mean differences and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) are presented.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving humans were approved by CNS Resolution No. 466/12, in accordance with ethical principles standardized by S&#x00E3;o Judas University Ethics Committee N&#x00B0;: 4.583.831. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec23">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<p>A total of 102 participants were assessed for eligibility. Twelve participants were excluded for failing to meet the inclusion criteria (BMI &#x003E;25&#x202F;kg/m<sup>2</sup>, n&#x202F;=&#x202F;12; age&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;40&#x202F;years). Ninety participants were randomly assigned to the following groups: Control (IPI, n&#x202F;=&#x202F;30), Individual with Self-Selected Intensity (ISS, n&#x202F;=&#x202F;30), and Small Group with Self-Selected Intensity (SGS, n&#x202F;=&#x202F;30). The recruitment process and protocol implementation took place over a period of 18&#x202F;months. All data were collected prior to the end of June 2024.</p>
<p>The descriptive characteristics of the sample are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>. The groups exhibited only minor differences in age and BMI. The SGS group had a lower mean age and a higher standard deviation compared to the other groups.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Descriptive statistics of sample characteristics.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Total sample (<italic>n</italic> =&#x202F;90)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">IPI (<italic>n</italic> =&#x202F;30)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">SGS (<italic>n</italic> =&#x202F;30)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">ISS (<italic>n</italic> =&#x202F;30)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">M</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">M</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">M</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">M</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Age</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">48.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">48.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.40</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">45.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">49.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">BMI (kg/m2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">32.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">VO2 peak</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>n, sample size; <italic>M</italic>, mean; SD, standard deviation.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Heart rate data are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>, with the mean HR during the exercise session remaining within the moderate intensity range for all groups: IPI&#x202F;=&#x202F;70.5% HRmax, SGS&#x202F;=&#x202F;70.3% HRmax, and ISS&#x202F;=&#x202F;71% HRmax. The two-way ANOVA revealed a minimal interaction effect between group and time across the different groups (<italic>F</italic> =&#x202F;1.17, <italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.31, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;0.02).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Descriptive statistics, group differences, and effect sizes for heart rate (bpm) of each protocol.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th rowspan="2"/>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">
<bold>IPI (<italic>n</italic> =&#x202F;30)</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="4">
<bold>SGS (<italic>n</italic> =&#x202F;30)</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="4">
<bold>ISS (<italic>n</italic> =&#x202F;30)</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">
<bold>Group by time interaction</bold>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<bold>
<italic>M</italic>
</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<bold>SD</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<bold>(% Max HR)</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<bold>
<italic>M</italic>
</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<bold>SD</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<bold>(% Max HR)</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<bold>&#x0394;%</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<bold>
<italic>M</italic>
</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<bold>SD</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<bold>(% Max HR)</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<bold>&#x0394;%</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<bold><italic>F</italic> value</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<bold><italic>p</italic> value</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<bold>&#x03B7;</bold>
<sup>
<bold>2</bold>
</sup>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">HR before</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">77.83</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.83</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">45.3%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">80.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">46.9%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">84.27</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.98</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">49.0%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.08</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.17</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.31</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">HR 5&#x202F;min</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">117.87</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">68.5%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">112.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.67</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">65.5%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">118.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">68.8%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.00</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">HR 15&#x202F;min</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">122.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.88</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">71.3%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">125.97</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">73.2%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.03</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">125.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14.41</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">72.8%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.02</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">HR 25&#x202F;min</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">123.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.72</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">71.7%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">124.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14.11</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">72.1%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">122.93</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18.21</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">71.5%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">HR session</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">121.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.41</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">70.5%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">120.89</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">70.3%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">122.14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">71.0%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.01</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">HR after</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">89.33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14.69</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">51.9%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">88.37</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14.18</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">51.4%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">86.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50.3%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.03</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="4">
<bold>Mean difference (95% CI)</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="4">
<bold>Mean difference (95% CI)</bold>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">MD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">LBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">UBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">MD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">LBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">UBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2212;0.21</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;3.81</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.38</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.98</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.32</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;4.92</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.27</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.66</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>IPI, Group with prescribed intensity (64&#x2013;76% HRmax) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>); SGS, Small Group with self-selected intensity; ISS, Individual Group with self-selected intensity. M, mean; SD, standard deviation; &#x0394;%, % difference in M compared to the control group, <italic>F</italic> value, <italic>F</italic>-ratio value; <italic>p</italic> value, probability of <italic>F</italic>; &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup>, eta-squared effect size; CI, Confidence interval; LBCI, Lower bound of the 95% confidence interval; UBCI, Upper bound of the 95% confidence interval; MD, mean difference; HR, heart rate (bpm); HR Session, HR during the session, without considering before and after exercise.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The mean differences also did not reveal significant variations between the ISS and SGS groups when compared to the IPI group. The SGS group exhibited an average HR that was 0.3% lower than the IPI group (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.98, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;0.21, 95% CI -3.81 to 3.38), while the ISS group had an average HR that was 0.7% higher than the IPI group (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.66, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.32, 95% CI -4.92 to 2.27). These results support the primary hypothesis. The findings suggest that self-selected intensity is comparable to prescribed intensity, both classified as moderate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>), and represent a safe and effective training approach for adult women beginning aerobic exercise programs, particularly those who are overweight or obese, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Means and standard deviations of heart rate (HR) (vertical axis) compared between the control and experimental groups and collection time points (horizontal axis).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-16-1533785-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The volume load analyses of the aerobic training session are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>. The one-way ANOVA showed a small interaction effect among the different groups (<italic>F</italic> =&#x202F;0.87, <italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.45, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;0.03).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Descriptive statistics, group differences, and effect sizes for training volume (km) of each protocol.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
<th align="left" valign="top" colspan="4">Mean difference (95% CI)</th>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>M</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x0394;%</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">MD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">LBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">UBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">F-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x03B7;<sup>2</sup></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><bold>IPI</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.30</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.87</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.45</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><bold>SGS</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.27</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;3.8%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.08</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.72</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.28</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><bold>ISS</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.32</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;2.9%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.35</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.27</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.12</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>IPI, Group with prescribed intensity (64&#x2013;76% HRmax) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>); SGS, Small Group with self-selected intensity; ISS, Individual Group with self-selected intensity. M, mean; SD, standard deviation; &#x0394;%, % difference in M compared to the control group; <italic>F</italic> value, <italic>F</italic>-ratio value; <italic>p</italic>-value, probability of F; &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup>, eta-squared effect size; CI, confidence interval; LBCI, Lower bound of the 95% confidence interval; UBCI, upper bound of the 95% confidence interval; MD, mean difference; HR, heart rate; HR Session, HR during the session, without considering before and after exercise.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The mean values also demonstrated similarities between the groups. The SGS group exhibited a 3.8% lower mean volume load recorded at the end of the exercise session (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.28, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.08, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;0.72 to 0.23), while the ISS group had a mean VL that was 2.9% lower compared to the IPI group (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.12, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.12, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;0.35 to 0.27). In support of our secondary hypothesis, the VL results were similar across the groups. These findings suggest that self-selected intensity is comparable to prescribed intensity regarding the total distance covered during the exercise session, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Means and standard deviations of the volume load of the exercise session (vertical axis) compared between the control and experimental groups (horizontal axis).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-16-1533785-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The analyses of the mean values of the Feeling Scale during the exercise session are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref>. Significant differences were found between the SGS and ISS compared to the IPI protocol, showing a moderate interaction effect between group and time across the different groups (<italic>F</italic> =&#x202F;5.72, <italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;0.09).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Descriptive statistics, group differences, and effect sizes for the Feeling Scale (11 points) of each protocol.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">IPI (<italic>n</italic> =&#x202F;30)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">SGS (<italic>n</italic> =&#x202F;30)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">ISS (<italic>n</italic> =&#x202F;30)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Group by time interaction</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>M</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>M</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x0394;%</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">M</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x0394;%</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">F value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x03B7;<sup>2</sup></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">FS before</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.63</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.76</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.4%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.86</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;4.3%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.72</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">FS&#x2014;5&#x202F;min</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.94</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">65.7%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">88.1%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">FS&#x2014;15&#x202F;min</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.57</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.43</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">73.3%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.53</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.28</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">135.6%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">FS&#x2014;25&#x202F;min</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.48</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.93</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.68</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">83.3%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.87</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.11</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">79.2%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">FS session</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.78</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.25</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.08</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.31</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">73.1%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.53</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">98.8%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">FS after 10&#x202F;min</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.92</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.41</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.8%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.81</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.2%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">
<bold>Mean difference (95% CI)</bold>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">
<bold>Mean difference (95% CI)</bold>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">MD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">LBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">UBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">MD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">LBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">UBCI</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2212;0.78</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.45</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.34</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.7</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>IPI, Group with prescribed intensity (64&#x2013;76% HRmax) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>); SGS, Small Group with self-selected intensity; ISS, Individual Group with self-selected intensity. M, mean; SD, standard deviation, &#x0394;%, % difference in M compared to the control group; F, F-ratio value; p, probability of F; &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup>, eta-squared effect size; CI, confidence interval; LBCI, lower bound of the 95% confidence interval; UBCI, upper bound of the 95% confidence interval; MD, mean difference; FS Session, FS during the session, without considering before and after exercise.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The SGS group demonstrated a 73.1% increase in mean Feeling Scale scores, excluding pre- and post-exercise session values (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;1.1, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;1.1 to &#x2212;0.45), while the ISS group showed a 98.8% higher FS compared to the IPI group (p&#x202F;=&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;1.02, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;1.34 to &#x2212;0.7). In support of our secondary hypothesis, the FS results were significantly higher in both the SGS and ISS groups. These findings suggest that self-selected intensity is more enjoyable in both individual and small group settings. This indicates a more positive affective experience for women beginning physical training programs, particularly those who are overweight or obese, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Means and standard deviations of the Feeling Scale (FS) (vertical axis) compared between the control and experimental groups and collection time points (horizontal axis). &#x002A;&#x202F;=&#x202F;difference <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05 compared to the IPI group.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-16-1533785-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>A moderate effect was observed on the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale, as presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab6">Table 6</xref>, indicating a significant interaction among the different groups (<italic>F</italic> =&#x202F;5.57, <italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;0.11). Comparisons between the SGS and ISS groups revealed significant differences when compared to the IPI group.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Descriptive statistics, group differences, and effect sizes for the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (18&#x2013;126 points) of each protocol.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="4">Mean difference (95% CI)</th>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>M</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x0394;%</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">MD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">LBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">UBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>P</italic>-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">F value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>P</italic>-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x03B7;<sup>2</sup></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">IPI</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">106.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17.40</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.57</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SGS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">116.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.4%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;9.36</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;16.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;2.55</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">ISS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">115.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.5%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;10.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;17.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;3.55</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>IPI, Group with prescribed intensity (64&#x2013;76% HRmax) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>); SGS, Small Group with self-selected intensity; ISS, Individual Group with self-selected intensity. M, mean; SD, standard deviation; &#x0394;%, % difference in M compared to the control group; F, F-ratio value; p, probability of F; &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup>, eta-squared effect size; CI, confidence interval; LBCI, lower bound of the 95% confidence interval; UBCI, upper bound of the 95% confidence interval; MD, mean difference.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The SGS group exhibited a 9.4% increase in the mean PACES score administered at the end of the exercise session (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;9.36, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;16.17 to &#x2212;2.55), while the ISS group showed an 8.5% higher mean compared to the IPI group (p&#x202F;=&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;10.36, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;17.17 to &#x2212;3.55). In support of our secondary hypothesis, the PACES results were higher in both the SGS and ISS groups, indicating that self-selected intensity is more enjoyable in both individual and small group settings for women with overweight and obesity starting aerobic training programs, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Means and standard deviations of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) (vertical axis) compared between the control and experimental groups (horizontal axis). &#x002A;&#x202F;=&#x202F;difference <italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x202F;0.05 compared to the IPI group.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-16-1533785-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The analysis of the Intention to Repeat the Exercise Session (INT) is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab7">Table 7</xref>. The one-way ANOVA revealed a moderate interaction effect among the different groups (<italic>F</italic> =&#x202F;18.6, <italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;0.39).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab7">
<label>Table 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Descriptive statistics, group differences, and effect sizes for the intention to repeat the exercise session (1&#x2013;7 points).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="4">Mean difference (95% CI)</th>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>M</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x0394;%</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">MD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">LBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">UBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F</italic> value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x03B7;<sup>2</sup></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">IPI</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">18.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SGS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">41.6%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;2.32</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.27</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">ISS</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">37.6%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.63</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;2.25</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>IPI, Group with prescribed intensity (64&#x2013;76% HRmax) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>); SGS, Small Group with self-selected intensity; ISS, Individual Group with self-selected intensity. M, mean; SD, standard deviation; &#x0394;%, % difference in M compared to the control group; F, F-ratio value; <italic>p</italic>-value, probability; &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup>, eta-squared effect size; CI, confidence interval; LBCI, lower bound of the 95% confidence interval; UBCI, upper bound of the 95% confidence interval; MD, mean difference.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The mean values also revealed significant differences when compared to the control group. The SGS group exhibited a 41.6% increase in the mean INT score administered at the end of the exercise session (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.8, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;2.32 to &#x2212;1.27), while the ISS group demonstrated a 37.6% higher mean INT compared to the control group (p&#x202F;=&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;1.63, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;2.25 to &#x2212;1.1). In support of our secondary hypothesis, the INT results were higher in both the SGS and ISS groups compared to the control group. These findings suggest that self-selected intensity increases the intention to repeat the exercise session three times in the following week, both in individual and small group conditions. This approach represents a training strategy that enhances the intention to repeat the behavior in the future for women with overweight or obesity who are initiating physical training programs, as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Means and standard deviations of the Intention to Repeat the Exercise Session scale (vertical axis) compared between the control and experimental groups (horizontal axis). &#x002A;&#x202F;=&#x202F;difference <italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x202F;0.05 compared to the IPI group.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-16-1533785-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The analyses of the BPNSFS are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab8">Table 8</xref>. The one-way ANOVA showed a large interaction effect among the different groups for autonomy (<italic>F</italic> =&#x202F;290, p&#x202F;=&#x202F;0, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;0.87).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab8">
<label>Table 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Descriptive statistics, group differences, and effect sizes for basic psychological needs (6&#x2013;30 points).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">IPI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">SGS</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">ISS</th>
<th/>
<th/>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>M</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>M</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x0394;%</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>M</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x0394;%</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F</italic> value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">&#x03B7;<sup>2</sup></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Autonomy</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.76</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16.36</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.72</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">243.70%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16.83</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.43</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">253.60%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">290</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Relationship</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.37</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">206.80%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.68</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13.20%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">346</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.88</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Competence</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15.56</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.19</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14.36</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.17</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;7.70%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15.08</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.36</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;3.10%</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1,07</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0,34</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.02</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" colspan="3">Mean difference (95% CI)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Mean difference (95% CI)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">MD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">LBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">UBCI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">MD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">LBCI</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2212;11.60</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2212;12.90</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2212;10.20</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">12.00</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">10.70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2212;10.96</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2212;12.07</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2212;9.85</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2212;0.70</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2212;1.81</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">1.20</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2212;0.86</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">3.26</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.23</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x2212;1.83</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>IPI, Group with prescribed intensity (64&#x2013;76% HRmax) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>); SGS, Small Group with self-selected intensity; ISS, Individual Group with self-selected intensity. M, mean; SD, standard deviation; &#x0394;%, % difference in M compared to the control group, <italic>F</italic> value, F-ratio value; <italic>p</italic>-value, probability of <italic>F</italic>; &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup>, eta-squared effect size; CI, confidence interval; LBCI, lower bound of the 95% confidence interval; UBCI, upper bound of the 95% confidence interval; MD, mean difference.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The mean values also revealed significant differences when compared to the control group. The SGS group demonstrated a 16.36% increase in mean autonomy at the end of the exercise session (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.8, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;2.32 to &#x2212;1.27), while the ISS group exhibited a 16.83% higher mean compared to the control group (p&#x202F;=&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;1.63, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;2.25 to &#x2212;1.1). In support of our secondary hypothesis, the autonomy scores were higher in both the SGS and ISS groups compared to the control group. These findings suggest that self-selected intensity enhances the perception of autonomy in both individual and small group settings when compared to the control group, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Means and standard deviations of the Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction Scale (vertical axis) compared between the control and experimental groups (horizontal axis). &#x002A;&#x202F;=&#x202F;difference <italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x202F;0.05 compared to the IPI group.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-16-1533785-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The one-way ANOVA revealed a large interaction effect between the groups for relatedness (<italic>F</italic> =&#x202F;346, <italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;0.88). The SGS group demonstrated a 206.8% increase in mean relatedness at the end of the exercise session (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;10.96, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;12.07 to &#x2212;9.85), while the ISS group exhibited a 13.2% higher mean compared to the control group (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.29, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;0.7, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;1.81 to 0.29). This suggests that the ISS group had similar relatedness perceptions to the IPI.</p>
<p>The one-way ANOVA also revealed a small interaction effect for competence (<italic>F</italic> =&#x202F;1.07, <italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.34, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;0.02), with means showing minimal differences across the protocols. The SGS group demonstrated a 7.7% lower mean competence compared to the control group at the end of the exercise session (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.35, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.20, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.86 to 3.26), while the ISS group had a 3.1% lower mean competence compared to the control group at the end of the session (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.96, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.23, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;1.83 to 2.3). These results suggest that all groups had similar competence perceptions by the end of the exercise session.</p>
<p>Thus, the results indicate that self-selected intensity in both groups (SGS and ISS) positively impacted autonomy perception compared to the control group. The SGS group demonstrated more favorable results for relatedness perception compared to both the IPI and the ISS groups.</p>
<p>The SGS protocol elicited a higher response in the relatedness variable, which may be attributed to the perception of social bonding and support experienced in a small group exercise context. Such an environment facilitates positive social interactions and fosters a sense of belonging among participants, aligning with the relatedness need as defined by Self-Determination Theory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>). This theory posits that social connection constitutes a fundamental pillar of intrinsic motivation, thereby enhancing engagement and promoting long-term adherence to exercise programs. These findings underscore the significance of integrating social components into exercise prescriptions, particularly for populations that may derive substantial benefits from increased social support and a strengthened sense of community.</p>
<p>For competence perception, no significant differences were observed, with all groups showing similar values.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec24">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The present study posits as its primary hypothesis that SGS and ISS would select an intensity similar to the control group (IPI), which followed the American College of Sports Medicine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>) recommendations for moderate-intensity aerobic exercise prescription (64&#x2013;76% of HRmax). The results support our primary hypothesis, as the mean heart rate values were similar across groups: control group IPI&#x202F;=&#x202F;70.5% of HRmax, SGS group&#x202F;=&#x202F;70.3% of HRmax, and ISS group&#x202F;=&#x202F;71% of HRmax (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.31, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;0.02). Our findings align with previous studies, such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Lind et al. (2005)</xref>, which explored the relationship between self-selected intensity and prescribed moderate intensities. The results indicated that when allowed to choose, participants generally selected intensities similar to those recommended, suggesting that self-selection can align with prescribed intensity in terms of physiological benefits.</p>
<p>We did not find studies in the literature comparing total distance covered (training volume) in aerobic exercise between prescribed and self-selected intensities. Our study addresses this gap by showing that the volume load covered was similar across groups (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.45, <italic>F</italic> =&#x202F;0.87, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;&#x2212;0.03), with the SGS group covering 3.8% less distance than IPI (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.28, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.08, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;0.72 to 0.23). On the other hand, the ISS group covered 2.9% less distance than IPI (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.12, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;0.35, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;0.35 to 0.27).</p>
<p>In this context, we consider that self-selected intensity in aerobic exercise is a suitable prescription approach both from a physiological standpoint for sedentary adult women with overweight/obesity and in terms of affective responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Ekkekakis and Lind, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Parfitt et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Lind et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Ekkekakis et al., 2005</xref>). The evaluation of middle-aged sedentary women by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Lind et al. (2005)</xref> showed that self-selected intensity corresponded to the prescribed recommendation for improving aerobic capacity, indicating that self-selection can achieve levels similar to those prescribed for this population.</p>
<p>In line with the tripartite exercise model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Ladwig et al. (2017)</xref>, the dimensions of efficacy, safety, and pleasure support the hypotheses of the present study. Traditionally, exercise prescriptions focus on efficacy, ensuring that exercise promotes desired physiological adaptations, and safety, minimizing the risk of injury. However, low adherence to gym exercise programs is a widely recognized challenge (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Sperandei et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Gjestvang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Gjestvang et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Gjestvang et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Gjestvang et al., 2023</xref>), with dropout rates within the first 3&#x2013;6 months, suggesting that current strategies may hinder adherence.</p>
<p>For older adults with chronic conditions, factors such as physical limitations and underlying health issues can pose significant barriers to participation in physical activities. Nevertheless, structured aerobic programs, such as walking, have been shown to enhance cognitive functioning and quality of life, emphasizing the potential of tailored interventions to improve exercise enjoyment and adherence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Cohen, 1988</xref>). These findings are consistent with our study, which demonstrated that small-group exercise elicited greater enjoyment compared to the IPI protocol. This highlights the critical role of social interaction in promoting positive affective responses and supporting sustained engagement in physical activity programs.</p>
<p>The perception of pleasure during exercise is a factor that optimizes long-term adherence, as enjoyable experiences during exercise generate positive affective responses associated with maintaining future behavior and intention to repeat exercise (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref76">Williams et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Williams, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Rhodes and Kates, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">Williams et al., 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>Our secondary hypothesis posits that self-selected intensity protocols (SGS and ISS) would result in higher affective responses compared to IPI. Our data showed that affective valence was higher in SGS and ISS (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, <italic>F</italic> =&#x202F;5.72, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;0.09), with SGS showing 73.1% higher exercise enjoyment compared to IPI (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.78, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;1.1 to &#x2212;0.45). In ISS, affective valence during exercise was 98.8% higher than IPI (p&#x202F;=&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;1.02, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;1.34 to 0.7).</p>
<p>Our findings are consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Ekkekakis and Lind (2005)</xref>, who evaluated overweight and obese adults performing aerobic exercise sessions and found that affective valence in self-selected intensity was more positive than in prescribed intensity. Thus, we suggest that self-selection of aerobic exercise intensity should consider not only efficacy and safety but also the pleasurable nature of training. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Parfitt et al. (2006)</xref> investigated sedentary adults in self-selected and prescribed intensity aerobic training with heart rate and pleasure/displeasure monitoring, demonstrating that self-selected intensity resulted in higher affective responses than prescribed intensity.</p>
<p>The Feeling Scale is a reliable tool for assessing self-selected intensity in aerobic training, especially for women in gym environments. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Hamlyn-Williams et al. (2015)</xref> demonstrated that sedentary women effectively used the FS to regulate exercise intensity at moderate levels, predominantly experiencing positive affective responses. These findings suggest that the FS allows for real-time effort adjustment according to one&#x2019;s emotional and physical state, promoting a more enjoyable experience. The potential of using the FS as an accessible tool for regulating exercise intensity appears to support and contribute to a pleasant exercise practice tailored to individual preferences.</p>
<p>As a mediator of successful interventions aimed at exercise continuity, enjoyment is associated with pleasurable experiences that increase the likelihood of adherence to training (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Jekauc, 2015</xref>). Positive and enjoyable exercise experiences increase the probability of maintaining active behavior in the future, with previously experienced pleasure being a strong predictor of adherence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Rodrigues et al., 2021</xref>). The results of the present study showed that enjoyment was higher in the self-selected intensity groups SGS and ISS (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, <italic>F</italic> =&#x202F;5.57, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;0.11), with SGS 9.4% higher than IPI (p&#x202F;=&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;9.36, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;16.2 to &#x2212;2.55) and ISS 8.5% higher than IPI (p&#x202F;=&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;10.4, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;17.2 to &#x2212;3.55).</p>
<p>In this context, we understand that self-selected intensity results in greater enjoyment in adult women with overweight/obesity, indicating that it is a positive strategy for optimizing affective responses during exercise, as enjoyment is a predictor of future behavior related to physical exercise. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Rodrigues et al. (2021)</xref> investigated how enjoyment influences exercise adherence, associating enjoyment with previous experiences and current exercise adherence. The results showed that enjoyment experienced in previous exercise sessions was a strong predictor of continuous adherence.</p>
<p>The experience of pleasure or discomfort during activity influences future intention for continued or discontinued exercise practice. The hedonic theory of human behavior associates that individual who maximize pleasure and minimize discomfort during exercise (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Kahneman, 1999</xref>) have greater long-term adherence to training. Perceived pleasure fosters greater intrinsic motivation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>), increasing the likelihood of adherence to sustained training commitment. The present study showed that the intention to engage in physical exercise three times in the following week, an indicator of future behavior, was higher in the SGS and ISS protocols compared to IPI (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, <italic>F</italic> =&#x202F;18.6, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;0.39). In SGS, the intention to repeat the exercise session three times in the following week was 41.6% higher (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.8, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;2.32 to &#x2212;1.27) than IPI, while ISS was 37.6% higher than IPI (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.63, 95% CI&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;2.25 to &#x2212;1.1). The results of the present study, based on the hedonic theory of human behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ekkekakis, 2003</xref>), demonstrate that self-selected protocols were more positive in affective valence and enjoyment, suggesting better results in the intention to repeat the exercise session the following week (future behavior).</p>
<p>Our study suggests that self-selected exercise intensity may yield positive psychological and physiological responses, optimizing affective responses such as pleasure and reducing discomfort when compared to rigid exercise prescriptions. These findings align with those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ekkekakis (2003)</xref>, who demonstrated that more pleasant exercise experiences support long-term adherence, as well as promoting positive emotional experiences during training (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Ekkekakis, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Ekkekakis and Lind, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ekkekakis, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Ekkekakis et al., 2006</xref>).</p>
<p>Given that adherence and continuity in exercise programs are influenced by motivational factors, Self-Determination Theory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>) posits that human motivation and well-being are largely shaped by the satisfaction of basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Our results indicated that the perception of autonomy was significantly higher in the SGS and ISS groups compared to the IPI group (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, <italic>F</italic> =&#x202F;290, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;0.9). Specifically, the SGS group exhibited a 243.7% increase (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;11.6, 95% CI &#x2013;12.9 to &#x2212;10.2), and the ISS group showed a 253.6% increase (p&#x202F;=&#x202F;0, mean difference&#x202F;=&#x202F;12, 95% CI 10.7 to 13.4) compared to IPI. Autonomy refers to the desire to feel responsible for one&#x2019;s actions and choices, suggesting that allowing participants to self-select exercise intensity may be an effective strategy for fostering autonomy in exercise programs.</p>
<p>Regarding competence, which involves a sense of efficacy and skill development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>), our results revealed no significant differences between groups (<italic>p</italic> =&#x202F;0.34, <italic>F</italic> =&#x202F;1.07, &#x03B7;<sup>2</sup> =&#x202F;0). The SGS group showed a 7.7% lower perception of competence compared to IPI, and the ISS group was 3.1% lower than IPI. Although competence is associated with intrinsic motivation, Self-Determination Theory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>) highlights that the perception of efficacy is a stronger predictor of exercise behavior. These findings suggest that participants felt capable of successfully performing the exercise session, regardless of the method used to determine intensity.</p>
<p>When comparing small group and individual training, we anticipated changes in the relatedness component, which refers to the connection and sense of belonging to others (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>). Small group training promotes a positive social environment, creating a sense of support and community. Social interaction in small groups can optimize motivation and may contribute to the continuation of the exercise program (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Wayment and McDonald, 2017</xref>). In our study, the relatedness values for SGS and ISS were 206.8 and 13.2% higher than IPI, respectively, with no significant differences observed. Autonomous motivation, which encompasses the satisfaction of the psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, could explain the maintenance of future exercise behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Rodrigues et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Teixeira et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>). Psychological needs strengthen intrinsic motivation, which is associated with personal satisfaction and well-being (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Ekkekakis et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Rodrigues et al., 2021</xref>), and a motivational environment that fosters these needs supports sustained exercise engagement.</p>
<p>The results of this study support the initial hypotheses, showing that protocols focused on self-selecting exercise intensity are a practical and effective approach to promoting motivational experiences and positive affect in overweight and obese adult women. This positive effect appears to contribute to sustained exercise adherence, a critical factor in improving long-term health and quality of life. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that self-selected intensities yield physiological effects comparable to traditional exercise prescriptions, with similar total training volumes across both self-selected and prescribed intensity conditions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze this aspect in the scientific literature.</p>
<p>The SGS and ISS protocols were designed to stimulate competence development through skill acquisition and progress, as well as enhance interpersonal relationships. We understand that social interactions within small groups provide a sense of belonging and social support&#x2014;factors that should be integrated into exercise program prescriptions to increase enjoyment and the likelihood of long-term adherence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Teixeira et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>). The study&#x2019;s results revealed mean differences of 1 to 2&#x202F;units on the Feeling Scale between the SGS and ISS groups, confirming a positive affective response to self-selected intensity protocols. These findings suggest that positive experiences during physical exercise may increase future physical activity levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">Williams et al., 2008</xref>). A one-point increase on the FS corresponds to an additional 27&#x2013;29&#x202F;min of physical activity per week, with further increases of 15&#x2013;38&#x202F;min per week after 6&#x202F;months (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref77">Williams et al., 2012</xref>), potentially reaching up to 41 additional minutes per week after 12&#x202F;months (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">Williams et al., 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>This study fills a gap in the literature by demonstrating that, even within small group contexts, self-selected intensity results in training volumes similar to those prescribed in traditional exercise prescriptions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>). In addition to preserving exercise efficacy and safety, the small group format enhances social relationships, a psychological construct associated with autonomy and crucial in regulating active behavior. The social aspect of small group training fosters a perception of support, which contributes to long-term adherence and engagement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Teixeira et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Deci and Ryan, 2000</xref>).</p>
<p>Thus, the results of the present study suggest that affective indicators should be considered in the selection of exercise intensity and volume in aerobic training prescription guidelines. While these guidelines are widely recognized (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>) and support individualized exercise, their integration with psychological variables remains limited. The various factors analyzed in the SGS and ISS protocols provide new insights into exercise psychophysiology and present a practical, evidence-based approach to intensity prescription, consistent with ACSM (2021) recommendations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Liguori et al., 2021</xref>). This approach emphasizes the prioritization of emotional experience in practitioners (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Wienke and Jekauc, 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>The SGS and ISS protocols employed in this study, which allowed participants to self-select their exercise intensity during aerobic exercise, resulted in higher perceived autonomy compared to the IPI group (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C;&#x202F;0.05). This indicates greater efficacy in the affective experience of exercise, factors which may promote health and improve physical fitness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Hamlyn-Williams et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Costa et al., 2015</xref>). Among the strengths of the study are: (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Shilton et al., 2024</xref>) the similarity in intensity and volume between the SGS and ISS groups, which suggests that small group training is a safe and enjoyable alternative to individual exercise at self-selected intensity, comparable to traditional prescription; and the importance of fostering autonomy and social relationships in the small group protocol, particularly when participants share similar demographics, such as age and sex, as in the present study.</p>
<p>Achieving sustainable behavior change requires longitudinal analyses, as participants may drop out or experience relapse over time. We believe that this study could inform future interventions that extend the monitoring period and track engagement with training sessions. Future research should investigate the efficacy of this intervention in longitudinal contexts, assessing adherence, frequency, and effects on fitness changes in supervised environments.</p>
<p>The main findings of the present study indicate that the intensity and training volume were comparable across the IPI, SGS, and ISS protocols, demonstrating that self-selected intensity is biologically equivalent to prescribed intensity. Affective responses, including pleasure, enjoyment, and intention to repeat the activity, were more positive in the self-selected intensity protocols. This underscores self-selection as a safe, effective, and more enjoyable alternative to prescribed intensity in aerobic training. Moreover, self-selection facilitated greater autonomy, a core construct for sustaining exercise behavior, as outlined by Self-Determination Theory. Small-group training with self-selected intensity emerged as an effective approach, enhancing both autonomy and relatedness&#x2014;key components of Self-Determination Theory&#x2014;which may contribute to improved adherence to aerobic exercise routines. These findings present practical strategies that can be implemented in fitness centers and public health programs to promote sustained physical activity participation.</p>
<p>The findings of the present study suggest that exercise professionals working with obese women should implement individualized, participant-centered strategies. Allowing participants to self-select exercise intensity within safe parameters can enhance feelings of pleasure and autonomy, while incorporating small-group sessions can strengthen social support and foster a sense of connection. Regular monitoring of affective responses, such as valence and pleasure, is crucial for adjusting sessions to optimize enjoyment and effectiveness. Furthermore, creating a supportive and inclusive environment, setting realistic and attainable goals, and ensuring gradual progression in exercise programs can enhance intrinsic motivation and promote long-term adherence, consistent with the principles of Self-Determination Theory.</p>
<p>A key limitation of the present study is its cross-sectional design and the small sample size, comprising overweight/obese adult women, which restricts the generalizability of the findings to other populations, such as men or younger individuals. Additionally, the short-term nature of the study and reliance on self-reported psychological measures represent notable limitations. While the findings suggest that self-selected intensity and small-group training promote positive affective experiences and may enhance exercise adherence, it remains uncertain whether these effects are generalizable to individuals with chronic conditions or to different age groups. Future research should investigate the efficacy of this psychophysiological approach in diverse demographic contexts. Furthermore, longitudinal studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of self-selected intensity in sustaining exercise behavior over time and across various exercise modalities, such as resistance training, to expand and solidify the practical applications of this strategy in promoting physical activity adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec25">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The findings of the present study suggest that self-selected intensity in aerobic exercise, whether in individual or small group settings, is a feasible and more effective strategy for promoting positive affective experiences in overweight/obese women, without compromising standard recommendations for exercise intensity and volume. Self-selection not only results in intensity levels comparable to traditional prescriptions but also significantly increases perceived pleasure and the intention to repeat the exercise, factors that may enhance adherence to training.</p>
<p>Moreover, the small group model was equally effective, adding the benefit of fostering social relationships, which are linked to better behavioral regulation and more intrinsic motivation for exercise. These findings indicate that exercise prescription strategies incorporating autonomy and social support can be more effective, particularly for populations facing barriers to engagement in exercise programs, such as overweight/obese women.</p>
<p>In summary, this study advances our understanding of psychophysiological responses to aerobic exercise and underscores the importance of integrating pleasure and social support into exercise guidelines. This is especially relevant for groups that may benefit from a more supportive and flexible training environment tailored to individual preferences.</p>
<p>We thank CAPES, Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel for promoting the research project and S&#x00E3;o Judas Tadeu University for providing the laboratory for data collection.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec26">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec27">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of the S&#x00E3;o Judas Tadeu University, S&#x00E3;o Paulo, Brazil. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec28">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>CS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. WS: Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. GA: Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Validation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. AV: Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. AD: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. EB: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. LL: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. HD: Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. MZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. AJ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec29">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec30">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="sec31">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec32">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec85">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1533785/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1533785/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.xlsx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Albini</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>la</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Magnoni</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garrone</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morelli</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Janssens</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Physical activity and exercise health benefits: cancer prevention, interception, and survival</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Cancer Prevent.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>24</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000898</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38920329</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Almeida</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cal&#x00F3;</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santos</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gomes</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reis</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Inatividade f&#x00ED;sica, etilismo e c&#x00E2;ncer de pulm&#x00E3;o: uma revis&#x00E3;o de literatura</article-title>. <source>Observat&#x00F3;rio Econ. Latinoam.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>4285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4305</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55905/oelv22n1-226</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alves</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Enes</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Follador</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prestes</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effect of different training programs at self-selected intensity on body composition, perceptual responses and fitness outcomes in obese women</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Exerc. Sci.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>385</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.70252/HJJD8645</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36895844</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Azizan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fadzil</surname> <given-names>N. H. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>What stops us and what motivates us? A scoping review and bibliometric analysis of barriers and facilitators to physical activity</article-title>. <source>Ageing Res. Rev.</source> <volume>99</volume>:<fpage>102384</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.arr.2024.102384</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38914263</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barros</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prado</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ten&#x00F3;rio</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dias</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of self-selected or predetermined intensity aerobic exercise on the quality of life of adolescents with obesity. Translational journal of the American college of</article-title>. <source>Sports Med.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>266</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>271</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1249/TJX.0000000000000113</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35642214</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baumeister</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vohs</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>DeWall</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>How emotion shapes behavior: feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation</article-title>. <source>Personal. Social Psychol. Rev.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>167</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>203</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1088868307301033</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18453461</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bl&#x00FC;her</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>288</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>298</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41574-019-0176-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clavel San Emeterio</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garcia-Unanue</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iglesias-Soler</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luis Felipe</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gallardo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Prediction of abandonment in Spanish fitness centres</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Sport Sci.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>217</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>224</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/17461391.2018.1510036</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30132378</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <source>Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences</source>: <publisher-name>Routledge</publisher-name>, <fpage>567</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de S&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>I. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meireles Rda</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lemos</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elsangedy</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Affect-regulated exercise: an alternative approach for lifestyle modification in overweight/obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome</article-title>. <source>Gynecol. Endocrinol.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>971</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>975</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/09513590.2015.1092132</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26416702</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deci</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior</article-title>. <source>Psychol. Inq.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>227</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>268</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Pleasure and displeasure from the body: perspectives from exercise</article-title>. <source>Cognit. Emot.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>213</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>239</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02699930302292</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29715726</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Let them roam free? Physiological and psychological evidence for the potential of self-selected exercise intensity in public health</article-title>. <source>Sports Med.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>857</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>888</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2165/11315210-000000000-00000</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19757863</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>People have feelings! Exercise psychology in paradigmatic transition</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Psychol.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>84</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>88</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.018</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28813362</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petruzzello</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Variation and homogeneity in affective responses to physical activity of varying intensities: an alternative perspective on dose-response based on evolutionary considerations</article-title>. <source>J. Sports Sci.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>477</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>500</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02640410400021492</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16194996</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petruzzello</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The relationship between exercise intensity and affective responses demystified: to crack the 40-year-old nut, replace the 40-year-old nutcracker!</article-title> <source>Ann. Behav. Med.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>136</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>149</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12160-008-9025-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18369689</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hartman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ladwig</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>A methodological checklist for studies of pleasure and enjoyment responses to high-intensity interval training: part II</article-title>. <source>Intensity Timing Assessments Data Modeling Interpretation</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>91</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1123/jsep.2022-0027</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36898385</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lind</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Exercise does not feel the same when you are overweight: the impact of self-selected and imposed intensity on affect and exertion</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Obes.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>652</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>660</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.ijo.0803052</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16130028</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lind</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joens-Matre</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Can self-reported preference for exercise intensity predict physiologically defined self-selected exercise intensity?</article-title> <source>Res. Q. Exerc. Sport</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>81</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02701367.2006.10599334</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16646355</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parfitt</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petruzzello</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The pleasure and displeasure people feel when they exercise at different intensities: decennial update and progress towards a tripartite rationale for exercise intensity prescription</article-title>. <source>Sports Med.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>641</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>671</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2165/11590680-000000000-00000</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21780850</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petruzzello</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Acute aerobic exercise and affect: current status, problems and prospects regarding dose-response</article-title>. <source>Sports Med.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>337</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>374</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2165/00007256-199928050-00005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10593646</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tiller</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Extraordinary claims in the literature on high-intensity interval training: II. Are the extraordinary claims supported by extraordinary evidence?</article-title> <source>Kinesiol. Rev.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1123/kr.2022-0003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Elagizi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kachur</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carbone</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lavie</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blair</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A review of obesity, physical activity, and cardiovascular disease</article-title>. <source>Curr. Obes. Rep.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>571</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>581</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13679-020-00403-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32870465</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ellestad</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kemp</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1969</year>). <article-title>Maximal treadmill stress testing for cardiovascular evaluation</article-title>. <source>Circulation</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>517</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>522</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/01.CIR.39.4.517</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5778252</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Faro</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neto</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Agr&#x00ED;cola</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fonteles</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elsangedy</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Machado</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Long-term adherence to high-intensity functional training: an exploratory analysis in a &#x2018;real-world&#x2019; setting</article-title>. <source>Sci. Sports.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>81</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scispo.2023.01.003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39843627</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Faul</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Erdfelder</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buchner</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lang</surname> <given-names>A.-G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Statistical power analyses using G&#x002A;power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses</article-title>. <source>Behav. Res. Methods</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>1149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1160</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19897823</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Freitas</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferreira Sdos</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Freitas</surname> <given-names>R. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henrique de Souza</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gregorio da Silva</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effect of a 12-week aerobic training program on perceptual and affective responses in obese women</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Ther. Sci.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>2221</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2224</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1589/jpts.27.2221</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26311958</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gabay</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oravitan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The factors affecting adherence to physical activity in fitness facility settings: a narrative review</article-title>. <source>Timisoara Physical Educ. Rehabil. J.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2478/tperj-2022-0013</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gjestvang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abrahamsen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stensrud</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haakstad</surname> <given-names>L. A. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Motives and barriers to initiation and sustained exercise adherence in a fitness club setting-a one-year follow-up study</article-title>. <source>Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1796</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1805</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/sms.13736</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32488898</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gjestvang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abrahamsen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stensrud</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haakstad</surname> <given-names>L. A. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>What makes individuals stick to their exercise regime? A one-year follow-up study among novice exercisers in a fitness Club setting</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>638928</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2021.638928</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34122230</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gjestvang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stensrud</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haakstad</surname> <given-names>L. A. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Are changes in physical fitness, body composition and weight associated with exercise attendance and dropout among fitness club members? Longitudinal prospective study</article-title>. <source>BMJ Open</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>e027987</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027987</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30987992</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gjestvang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tangen</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arntzen</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haakstad</surname> <given-names>L. A. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>How do fitness Club members differentiate in background characteristics, exercise motivation, and social support? A Cross-sectional study</article-title>. <source>J. Sports Sci. Med.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>244</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52082/jssm.2023.235</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37293418</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Golaszewski</surname> <given-names>N. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>LaCroix</surname> <given-names>A. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hooker</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bartholomew</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Group exercise membership is associated with forms of social support, exercise identity, and amount of physical activity</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>630</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>643</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1612197X.2021.1891121</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35494549</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gomes</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Capel&#x00E3;o</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Commitment to exercise: the influence of personal, athletic, and psychological characteristics</article-title>. <source>Universitas Psychol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>12</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY12-2.ceip</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guthold</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stevens</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Riley</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bull</surname> <given-names>F. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1.9 million participants</article-title>. <source>Lancet Glob. Health</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>e1077</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e1086</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30193830</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guthold</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stevens</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Riley</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bull</surname> <given-names>F. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1.6 million participants. Lancet child Adolesc</article-title>. <source>Health</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31761562</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petruzzello</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Is the relationship of RPE to psychological factors intensity-dependent?</article-title> <source>Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>1365</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1373</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1249/01.mss.0000174897.25739.3c</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16118584</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hamlyn-Williams</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tempest</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coombs</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parfitt</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Can previously sedentary females use the feeling scale to regulate exercise intensity in a gym environment? An observational study</article-title>. <source>BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>30</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13102-015-0023-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26613045</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hardy</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rejeski</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Not what, but how one feels: the measurement of affect during exercise</article-title>. <source>J. Sport Exerc. Psychol.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>304</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>317</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1123/jsep.11.3.304</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hruby</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>F. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The epidemiology of obesity: a big picture</article-title>. <source>PharmacoEconomics</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>673</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>689</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s40273-014-0243-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25471927</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jekauc</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Enjoyment during exercise mediates the effects of an intervention on exercise adherence</article-title>. <source>Psychology</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>48</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/psych.2015.61005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jung</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bourne</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Little</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Where does HIT fit? An examination of the affective response to high-intensity intervals in comparison to continuous moderate- and continuous vigorous-intensity exercise in the exercise intensity-affect continuum</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>e114541</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0114541</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25486273</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kahneman</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <source>Objective happiness well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology</source>. <publisher-loc>New York, NY, US</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Russell Sage Foundation</publisher-name>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Katzmarzyk</surname> <given-names>P. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friedenreich</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shiroma</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>I. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Physical inactivity and non-communicable disease burden in low-income, middle-income and high-income countries</article-title>. <source>Br. J. Sports Med.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>106</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/bjsports-2020-103640</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33782046</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kendzierski</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>DeCarlo</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Physical activity enjoyment scale: two validation studies</article-title>. <source>J. Sport Exerc. Psychol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>50</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1123/jsep.13.1.50</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ning</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilkins</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carnethon</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berry</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Association of Body Mass Index with Lifetime Risk of cardiovascular disease and compression of morbidity</article-title>. <source>JAMA Cardiol.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>280</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>287</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0022</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29490333</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kwan</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bryan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>In-task and post-task affective response to exercise: translating exercise intentions into behaviour</article-title>. <source>Br. J. Health Psychol.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>131</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1348/135910709X433267</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19397847</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ladwig</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hartman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>AFFECT-BASED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTION: an idea whose time has come?</article-title> <source>ACSM Health Fitness J.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>10</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1249/FIT.0000000000000332</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liguori</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feito</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fountaine</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>ACSM&#x2019;s Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. American College of Sports Medicine</article-title>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15530593</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lind</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vazou</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The affective impact of exercise intensity that slightly exceeds the preferred level: &#x2018;pain&#x2019; for no additional &#x2018;gain&#x2019;</article-title>. <source>J. Health Psychol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>464</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>468</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1359105308088517</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18420754</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lind</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joens-Matre</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ekkekakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>What intensity of physical activity do previously sedentary middle-aged women select? Evidence of a coherent pattern from physiological, perceptual, and affective markers</article-title>. <source>Prev. Med.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>407</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>419</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.07.006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15530593</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martinez Kercher</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kercher</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bennion</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levy</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alexander</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amaral</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>2022 fitness trends from around the globe</article-title>. <source>ACSM Health Fitness J.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1249/FIT.0000000000000737</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matsudo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marsudo</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andrade</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andrade</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Braggion</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Question??rio Internacional de Atividade F??sica (IPAQ): Estudo de validade e reprodutibilidade no Brasil</article-title>. <source>Rev. Bras Ativ. F&#x00ED;s Sa&#x00FA;de.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>05</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12820/RBAFS.V.6N2P5-18</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mayo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liguori</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iglesias-Soler</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Copeland</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clavel San Emeterio</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lowe</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The active living gender's gap challenge: 2013-2017 Eurobarometers physical inactivity data show constant higher prevalence in women with no progress towards global reduction goals</article-title>. <source>BMC Public Health</source> <volume>19</volume>, 1677. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12889-019-8039-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31830956</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mielke</surname> <given-names>G. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>da Silva</surname> <given-names>I. C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kolbe-Alexander</surname> <given-names>T. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Shifting the physical inactivity curve worldwide by closing the gender gap</article-title>. <source>Sports Med.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>481</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>489</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s40279-017-0754-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28647914</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Murphy</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Watts</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Don</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jolink</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Algoe</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration scales probably do not validly measure need frustration</article-title>. <source>Psychol. Assess.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>139</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/pas0001193</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36442044</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ntoumanis</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>J. Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prestwich</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quested</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hancox</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Th&#x00F8;gersen-Ntoumani</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health</article-title>. <source>Health Psychol. Rev.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>214</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>244</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31983293</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parfitt</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rose</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burgess</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The psychological and physiological responses of sedentary individuals to prescribed and preferred intensity exercise</article-title>. <source>Br. J. Health Psychol.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1348/135910705X43606</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16480554</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rhodes</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kates</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Can the affective response to exercise predict future motives and physical activity behavior? A systematic review of published evidence</article-title>. <source>Annals Behav. Med.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>715</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>731</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12160-015-9704-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25921307</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teixeira</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cid</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Monteiro</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Have you been exercising lately? Testing the role of past behavior on exercise adherence</article-title>. <source>J. Health Psychol.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>1482</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1493</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1359105319878243</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31552769</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teixeira</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Macedo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neiva</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cid</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Monteiro</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The role of enjoyment and motivational determinants in persistence in the practice of physical exercise</article-title>. <source>Ciencia Saude Coletiva</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>5303</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5313</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1413-812320212611.3.01832020</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34787221</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Russell</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion</article-title>. <source>Psychol. Rev.</source> <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>172</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12529060</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sacramento</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pinheiro</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gomes</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pacheco</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montal</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andrade</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Impacto da Inatividade F&#x00ED;sica nas Interna&#x00E7;&#x00F5;es por Osteoartrite nas capitais brasileiras</article-title>. <source>Brazil. J. Implantol. Health Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1810</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1820</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n7p1810-1820</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shilton</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bauman</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beger</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chalkley</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Champagne</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elings-Pers</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>More people, more active, more often for heart health - taking action on physical activity</article-title>. <source>Glob. Heart</source> <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>42</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5334/gh.1308</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38708404</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sperandei</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vieira</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reis</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Adherence to physical activity in an unsupervised setting: explanatory variables for high attrition rates among fitness center members</article-title>. <source>J. Sci. Med. Sport</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>916</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>920</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jsams.2015.12.522</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26874647</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spink</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Priebe</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Groupness and adherence in structured exercise settings</article-title>. <source>Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>163</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>173</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/a0017596</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stafie</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singeap</surname> <given-names>A.-M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rotaru</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carol</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trifan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Bridging the gap: unveiling the crisis of physical inactivity in inflammatory bowel diseases</article-title>. <source>World J. Gastroenterol.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1265</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3748/wjg.v30.i10.1261</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38596487</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Strain</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flaxman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guthold</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Semenova</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cowan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Riley</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>National, regional, and global trends in insufficient physical activity among adults from 2000 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 507 population-based surveys with 5&#x00B7;7 million participants</article-title>. <source>Lancet Glob. Health</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>e1232</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e1243</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00150-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38942042</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Teixeira</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cid</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Monteiro</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Enjoyment as a predictor of exercise habit, intention to continue exercising, and exercise frequency: the intensity traits discrepancy moderation role</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>13</volume>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2022.780059</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35250719</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Teixeira</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mata</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Palmeira</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Markland</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Motivation, self-determination, and long-term weight control</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Physical Activity</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>22</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1479-5868-9-22</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22385818</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref71"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reading</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shephard</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q)</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Sport Sci.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>338</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>345</lpage>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1330274</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wayment</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Sharing a personal trainer: personal and social benefits of individualized</article-title>. <source>Small-Group Training. J Strength Cond Res.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>3137</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3145</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1519/JSC.0000000000001764</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28353489</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wienke</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jekauc</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A qualitative analysis of emotional facilitators in exercise</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>1296</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01296</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27621718</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref74"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Exercise, affect, and adherence: an integrated model and a case for self-paced exercise</article-title>. <source>J. Sport Exerc. Psychol.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>471</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>496</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1123/jsep.30.5.471</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18971508</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref75"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunsiger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ciccolo</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Albrecht</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marcus</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Acute affective response to a moderate-intensity exercise stimulus predicts physical activity participation 6 and 12 months later</article-title>. <source>Psychol. Sport Exerc.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>231</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>245</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.04.002</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18496608</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref76"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunsiger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Emerson</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gwaltney</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Monti</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miranda</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names> <suffix>Jr.</suffix></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Self-paced exercise, affective response, and exercise adherence: a preliminary investigation using ecological momentary assessment</article-title>. <source>J. Sport Exerc. Psychol.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>282</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>291</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1123/jsep.2015-0232</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27383469</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref77"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunsiger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jennings</surname> <given-names>E. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marcus</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Does affective valence during and immediately following a 10-min walk predict concurrent and future physical activity?</article-title> <source>Ann. Behav. Med.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>43</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12160-012-9362-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22532005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref78"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Current emotion research in health behavior science</article-title>. <source>Emot. Rev.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>277</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>287</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1754073914523052</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref79"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Withall</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Koning</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cross</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sutton</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Greaves</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bollen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>O2-2 should I stay or should I go? A mixed-methods, longitudinal investigation of predictors, barriers and enablers of adherence to REACT, a 12-month group-based, active-ageing programme</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Pub. Health</source> <volume>32</volume>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/eurpub/ckac094.010</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref80"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petrini</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Self-selected and prescribed intensity exercise to improve physical activity among inactive retirees</article-title>. <source>West. J. Nurs. Res.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>1301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1318</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0193945918791647</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30028241</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref81"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peila</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaplan</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Associations of lifestyle and genetic risks with obesity and related chronic diseases in the UK biobank: a prospective cohort study</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Clin. Nutr.</source> <volume>119</volume>, <fpage>1514</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1522</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.04.025</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38677521</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>