According to the World Health Organization (WHO), over 1.3 billion people, representing 16% of the world’s population, have some form of disability (World Health Organization [WHO], 2023). People with disabilities face additional challenges that may lead to increased levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. Physical limitations and negative societal attitudes may hinder their ability to participate in social activities, affecting personal relationships and community involvement. These barriers can result in social isolation, further diminishing quality of life and exacerbating depressive symptoms (Asdaq et al., 2024; Gayman et al., 2008; Yang, 2006). In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the need to study the mental health of individuals with disabilities within a comprehensive framework. This includes considering the complex interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors—an approach known as the biopsychosocial model. Supporting this perspective is the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), developed by the WHO in 2001, which provides a structured framework for understanding disability and health in a holistic context (World Health Organization [WHO], 2007).

According to the ICF framework, an individual’s health is not limited to the presence of a disability or physical illness. It is also influenced by personal factors such as age and self-esteem (Taylor and Stanton, 2007), as well as environmental factors such as family support, access to health services, and community attitudes (Engel, 1977; Marmot and Wilkinson, 2005). The lack of social participation and poor psychosocial support are associated with higher levels of anxiety and depression and poorer quality of life among people with disabilities. This research is also informed by the causal agency theory (Shogren et al., 2017), which emphasizes self-determination and autonomy as important to psychological wellbeing, and the Family Systems Theory, which holds that family dynamics have a big influence on people’s mental health (Huang et al., 2022). Studies have emphasized the importance of promoting independence and social integration to improve psychological wellbeing and quality of life (González-Ortega et al., 2023; von Mackensen et al., 2012).

Anxiety and depression are two of the most common mental disorders in the world. According to the American Psychiatric Association [APA] (2013), anxiety is usually defined as excessive worry, nervousness, or fear that interferes with day-to-day functioning, whereas depression is characterized by ongoing sadness, a loss of interest or pleasure, and physical or cognitive symptoms like exhaustion and trouble focussing (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013). According to the World Health Organization, estimated 264 million people worldwide suffered from an anxiety disorder and 322 million from a depressive disorder in 2015, with prevalence rates of 3.6 and 4.4% respectively (de Paula et al., 2020; World Health Organization [WHO], 2017). Anxiety, depression, poor self-efficacy, and impaired physical activity among individuals with disability have been identified as an important factors that negatively affect QoL (Choi et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2022; Peters et al., 2019). Therefore, anxiety and depression were selected for investigation due to their high prevalence, clear impact on quality of life, and relevance to national mental health priorities.

Many different factors contribute to the increased suffering of people with disabilities in their daily lives and their ability to access healthcare services, such as gender, age, economic status, community awareness, and religion, which may play an important role in the level of anxiety and depression among people with disabilities. For the suffering of those with disabilities to be prevented or lessened, it is vitally important to determine the factors that contribute to it (Hsieh et al., 2020; Roy et al., 2023; World Health Organization [WHO], 2023).

The Saudi disability survey in 2017, reports that the proportion of Saudis with disabilities (mild, severe, and extreme) is 7.1% of the total population, which is considered one of the social and medical challenges (Yousef, 2019). According to the 2022 Population and Housing Census, there are (5.1%), or 1,349,585 individuals with disabilities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and 78% of households with disabilities struggle to involve themselves in society (Statistics GAf, 2023). Bindawas, in 2018, examined the national and regional prevalence rates of disability, types, and severity in Saudi Arabia survey; in the Hail region, there is about 11,044 (2.1%) people with disabilities were reported (Bindawas and Vennu, 2018). Depression and anxiety disorders are the fourth and sixth leading causes of disability in Saudi Arabia according to Saudi National Mental Health Survey (2020). But, these were based on a limited sample and are not generalizable (Al-Subaie et al., 2020). Furthermore, a recent study by Alnasser et al. (2024), showed that anxiety prevalence among general population was estimated to be 18% which was associated with physical or chronic conditions (Alnasser et al., 2024).

Many reasons may lead to disability. Genetic factors and traumatic accidents are among the most important causes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Albejaidi and Nair, 2019). The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia pays great attention to people with disabilities by enhancing education, health care, and community support, in addition to enabling them to access all health and service facilities and encouraging their integration into society in a way that enhances their physical and psychological health and quality of life. At the same time, the government has provided many programs that aim to prevent and reduce disability, as well as early detection of disability cases and providing treatment and rehabilitation (Alharbi et al., 2020; Malik et al., 2024; Mitchell and Alfuraih, 2018; Rahman and Qattan, 2021). This situation emphasizes the importance of paying great attention to people with disabilities to protect their wellbeing and safety.

People with disabilities may require continuous health care support, frequent medical check-ups, home-based assistance, and other supporting services, including equipment provision, which make the care programs quite costly (Iezzoni et al., 2021). Due to their diseases and a lack of adequate facilities, some people with disabilities must be transferred to nursing facilities. It may be necessary to provide specialized medical, social, psychological, vocational, and other rehabilitative care to manage persons with disabilities (Blunden, 2021). Emotional and social health is a crucial metric when gauging the general health and wellbeing of individuals from diverse backgrounds. In Saudi Arabia, a country undergoing rapid social and economic change, identifying the health conditions and health services of people with disabilities is critical for policy creation, healthcare provision, and societal engagement (Rahman and Qattan, 2021).

To the best of our knowledge, the previous studies on disabilities and their related aspects are limited globally, and in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The investigation of the anxiety and depression among people with disabilities may contribute to a clear understanding of people with disabilities’ needs and policy creation and healthcare provision to such a population. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the level of anxiety and depression among people with physical disabilities, their satisfaction with and access to healthcare services and to identify the factors affecting their psychological wellbeing in Saudi Arabia. This component was investigated to better understand how service availability and accessibility may influence psychological wellbeing among people with disabilities.

This study was the first study in Saudi Arabia to assess the anxiety and depression levels and associated factors among people with physical disabilities. Our study found a high rate of anxiety and depression among individuals with physical disabilities, which is in line with previous studies investigating these conditions among people with disabilities and it is crucial to explore the potential mechanisms contributing to these psychological outcomes. A key explanatory framework is the biopsychosocial model, which suggests that psychological wellbeing in individuals with disabilities is influenced by a dynamic interplay of biological limitations, psychological resilience, and social context. For example, as Mushtaq and Akhouri (2016) indicated individuals with disabilities typically have low self-esteem, which raises their anxiety and depressive symptoms. This situation may integrate both the effects of the disability and social attitudes toward people with disability, making those people feel low self-esteem and increasing vulnerability to developing anxiety and depression (Mushtaq and Akhouri, 2016). Compared to national estimates (Alnasser et al., 2024), this study showed more prevalent anxiety and depression appeared among people with disabilities, which is consistent with other research showing a link between psychological problems and physical disabilities (Dong et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2022; Zahra et al., 2022).

Similar findings were found in studies conducted on similar conditions; studies conducted on people with multiple sclerosis (MS) have also shown significant associations between physical disability and psychological issues. In a similar line to this study’s findings, a study conducted by Jones et al. (2014) reflected that people with disabilities were more likely to have anxiety and depression (Jones et al., 2014). The presence of chronic conditions such as MS, in addition to the physical disabilities of the people, may justify this association. The findings are consistent with several psychological theories that explain the psychiatric health challenges faced by individuals with severe physical disabilities. According to the causal agency theory emphasizes the role of autonomy in psychological wellbeing, suggesting that the inability to make independent decisions, such as attending medical appointments without assistance, may increase feelings of helplessness. Additionally, family systems theory highlights how inadequate or overly dependent family dynamics can exacerbate emotional distress (Huang et al., 2022; Shogren et al., 2017).

One notable area of interest is the protective role of physical activity, highlighted in a study by Battalio et al. (2020), individuals with disabilities who engaged in physical activity reported lower anxiety and depression scores (Battalio et al., 2020). In this study, people with severe disabilities may be unable to engage in physical activity, which could partly justify the higher rates of anxiety and depression scores among this group of people. This underscores the need for interventions to promote physical activity suitable for the abilities of people with disabilities, which could result in lowering psychiatric health issues.

Furthermore, intellectual disabilities are also associated with a higher incidence of anxiety and depression among people with disabilities; a meta-analysis by Maïano et al. (2018) reflected that youth with intellectual disabilities are at higher risk of having these types of psychological issues . However, this study focused on physically people with disabilities; the connection between intellectual impairments and psychological problems underscores the need for comprehensive psychological services that mitigate both physical and intellectual disabilities. Integrating mental health screening into routine healthcare for people with disabilities could be beneficial in early detection and appropriate management of anxiety and depression.

The association between physical disabilities and psychological issues is not limited to adults or young people. A study by Dong et al. (2020) indicated that older people’s depression and anxiety were strongly correlated with physical disabilities, leading to a decrease in both psychological and physical health (Dong et al., 2020). Our findings echo this, reinforcing the need for a lifespan approach to psychological care for people with disabilities, including proactive screening and ongoing mental health support at all age stages.

These associations were uncertain in correlation linear regression analysis, since moderate disabilities were significant associated with higher anxiety levels among people with disabilities while other factors were not significantly associated with anxiety. Furthermore, the linear regression indicates that moderate to severe degrees of disability were linked to higher depression score among people with physical disabilities in Hail, Saudi Arabia.

The low p-values observed in the bivariate analysis, particularly for the variables “visiting hospital alone,” “priority in the waiting area,” and “parking sufficiency,” suggest that individuals who responded affirmatively to these items—i.e., those who reported going to the hospital alone, having priority in the waiting area, and access to sufficient parking—had higher depression scores. This finding is counterintuitive, and importantly, the associations disappear in the multiple regression analysis, indicating that the initial correlations were likely due to collinearity with another variable, most likely the degree of disability severity.

However, the significant findings of this study, there are some limitations. The first limitation is that it was conducted on a small sample size and located only in the Hail region, which may limit the generalizability of the study findings. Another limitation is that the study was conducted through an online self-reported survey, which could have been associated with inappropriate responses or irrelevant participants. In addition, the HADS is a screening tool for symptoms of anxiety and depression, not a diagnostic instrument. Therefore, the results reflect psychological distress levels, not confirmed clinical diagnoses. Although the HADS provides generally used cut-off points for categorizing scores into “normal,” “borderline,” and “case” levels, these categories were established in a hospital outpatient context using a small validation sample. As a result, they may not be generalizable to people with physical impairments living in the community. The type of disability and the level of disability is indicated by participants during the survey and is not indicated by a physician or health care provider which limit the findings of this study. The last limitation is that using a cross-sectional design during a short period could limit the significance of the findings.

This study highlights the significant mental health burden among individuals with physical disabilities in Hail, Saudi Arabia, with elevated levels of anxiety and depression, particularly among those with moderate to severe disabilities. Disability severity emerged as a key predictor of psychological distress, suggesting that as functional limitations increase, emotional vulnerability increases. Although some associations did not persist in multivariate analysis, our results suggest that certain healthcare-related stressors, such as visiting hospitals alone, prioritizing waiting areas, and inadequate parking, may contribute to higher depression scores. These factors may reflect broader issues related to accessibility, perceived support, and independence-elements known to influence psychological outcomes for individuals with disabilities. Current findings highlight the necessity of developing interventions that enhance the individuals’ psychological and physical health. Future research should examine how these interventions influence and how healthcare professionals could help to manage this issue. Additionally, longitudinal studies are advised to determine the effects of physical disability over an extended period and its association with psychiatric disorders like depression and anxiety.