<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Psychol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Psychology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Psychol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-1078</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1465880</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Psychology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Beyond the walls of the classroom: the psychodynamics of professional commitment and job involvement among female primary school teachers</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>Qiaolan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2190289/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>School of Tourism and Sports Health, Hezhou University</institution>, <addr-line>Hezhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: Irfan Saleem, Sohar University, Oman</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: Syed Muhammad Ali Shahbaz Habib, Minhaj University Lahore, Pakistan</p>
<p>Muzaffar Asad, Tecnol&#x00F3;gico de Monterrey, Mexico</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Qiaolan Su, <email>524587184@qq.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>18</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1465880</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>17</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>04</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2024 Su.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Su</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>This research used structural equation modeling (SEM) to explore the relationship between professional commitment, self-efficacy, psychological resilience, perceived organizational support and job involvement of female teachers in Chinese primary schools. The purpose of the study was to understand how these psychological and organizational factors work together on teachers&#x2019; job involvement. Based on the questionnaire survey of 596 female teachers in primary schools, the data were collected and analyzed by AMOS software. The results show that professional commitment plays a central role in teachers&#x2019; job involvement, and self-efficacy and psychological resilience, as important psychological resources, significantly affect job involvement through the mediation of perceived organizational support. The model fitting indicators CFI, RMSEA and SRMR were in line with the acceptance criteria, which verified the adaptability of the hypothesis model. The findings not only reinforce the application of resource conservation theory in the field of education, but also provide school administrators with strategies to improve teachers&#x2019; job involvement, especially by enhancing the importance of organizational support and resilience. In addition, the results have practical implications for the design of targeted teacher professional development programs.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>professional commitment</kwd>
<kwd>self-efficacy</kwd>
<kwd>psychological resilience</kwd>
<kwd>perceived organizational support</kwd>
<kwd>job involvement</kwd>
<kwd>female teachers</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="50"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="9198"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Organizational Psychology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Female primary school teachers play a crucial role in shaping the educational landscape in China. Recent statistics from the Ministry of Education indicate that female teachers account for approximately 60% of the primary school workforce in urban areas and 70% in rural regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9023">Ministry of Education, 2023</xref>). Job involvement is a critical factor in determining the effectiveness of teaching and learning processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Atteh et al., 2020</xref>). Teachers who are highly involved in their jobs not only perform better but also positively influence student outcomes and the overall school environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Liu and Yu, 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Wang, 2024</xref>). In particular, the job involvement of female primary school teachers has been a growing focus of research, as these educators often face additional challenges related to work-life balance and societal expectations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Skaalvik and Skaalvik, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Wang, 2024</xref>). Recent studies have demonstrated that job involvement is closely linked to self-efficacy, resilience, and perceived organizational support, all of which can mitigate the stress associated with teaching and improve overall professional commitment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Turner et al., 2022</xref>). These psychological and organizational resources are critical for enhancing teacher well-being and engagement, especially in high-stress environments such as primary education (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Giancaspro et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Wang, 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>Research on job involvement has traditionally focused on Western educational contexts, where cultural expectations and gender roles differ significantly from those in non-Western settings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Wang and Hall, 2018</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Kumar et al. (2024)</xref> highlighted that organizational culture and leadership have a profound impact on organizational outcomes, and this relationship is often mediated by the cultural context in which the organization operates. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Wang (2024)</xref> notes that in China, female teachers often face added pressures from traditional gender expectations, which may negatively influence their professional commitment and job involvement. Studies like <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Tschannen-Moran and Hoy (2001)</xref> have shown that teachers with higher self-efficacy tend to demonstrate greater resilience and engagement in their work, but these studies often fail to account for how cultural factors influence the dynamics of teacher engagement in non-Western contexts.</p>
<p>Furthermore, while the role of perceived organizational support in reducing burnout has been well-documented, its role as a mediator between professional commitment and job involvement has been less explored in educational settings, particularly in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Wang and Pan, 2023</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Kanaan et al. (2024)</xref> further underline the importance of organizational factors in improving performance, particularly in entrepreneurial firms, by demonstrating that knowledge management and stakeholder relationships play a critical role in moderating the effects of open innovation on firm performance. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Saleem et al. (2023)</xref> demonstrated that resilience plays a crucial role in maintaining employee performance during challenging situations like the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting that perceived organizational support could similarly buffer the effects of stress on teacher engagement in high-pressure environments. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Liu and Yu (2024)</xref> identified perceived organizational support as a key factor in enhancing resilience, suggesting that supportive leadership can foster greater job involvement. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Edinger and Edinger (2018)</xref> emphasized the importance of institutional support in improving job satisfaction and reducing teacher turnover intentions, underscoring the need for further research into how these dynamics unfold in diverse educational contexts. These findings echo the results of both <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Allam et al. (2021)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Allam et al. (2022)</xref>, who suggest that the organizational climate, including spiritual and emotional support, plays a critical role in moderating stress and burnout in high-demand work environments like teaching.</p>
<p>In line with the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model, the interplay between job demands and available resources significantly influences job involvement. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Bakker and Demerouti (2008)</xref> argue that job resources such as organizational support and professional development opportunities can mitigate the negative impact of job demands on teacher engagement. However, the applicability of the JD-R model to non-Western educational settings remains underexplored. The findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Wang (2024)</xref> support the extension of this model to non-Western settings, particularly in understanding how organizational resources enhance resilience and self-efficacy in female primary school teachers in China. Additionally, the Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory posits that individuals strive to retain, protect, and build resources, which can help buffer against job stress and burnout (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Hobfoll et al., 2018</xref>). This theory has been used to explain how teachers use internal resources like self-efficacy and external resources such as organizational support to enhance their job involvement. The work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Wang and Pan (2023)</xref> extends COR theory by exploring how job crafting and organizational resources interact to shape professional commitment, suggesting that self-efficacy and resilience serve as key personal resources for teachers to navigate the challenges of the profession.</p>
<p>Despite the significant role of job involvement in teacher performance, the literature lacks comprehensive studies examining how these psychological and organizational factors interact to influence job involvement, particularly in non-Western educational settings such as China. Most existing research has focused on Western contexts, leaving a gap in understanding how cultural expectations and gender roles affect job involvement among female teachers in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Liu and Yu, 2024</xref>). Additionally, while studies have identified the importance of self-efficacy and resilience, the mediating role of perceived organizational support in this relationship remains underexplored.</p>
<sec id="sec2">
<label>1.1</label>
<title>Research gaps</title>
<p>The present study addresses several important research gaps. First, it examines the unique socio-cultural challenges faced by female primary school teachers in China, where traditional gender expectations may influence their job involvement and professional commitment. Second, while previous studies have demonstrated the impact of self-efficacy and resilience on job involvement, there is a lack of research on how these factors interact with organizational support in enhancing teacher engagement, particularly among female educators. Finally, this study aims to fill the gap in understanding how perceived organizational support serves as a mediating mechanism between professional commitment and job involvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>1.2</label>
<title>Research questions</title>
<p>How does professional commitment influence job involvement among female primary school teachers in China?</p>
<p>What role does perceived organizational support play in mediating the relationship between professional commitment and job involvement?</p>
<p>How do self-efficacy and resilience contribute to job involvement, and how do they interact with perceived organizational support?</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>1.3</label>
<title>Research objectives</title>
<p>To investigate the impact of professional commitment on job involvement.</p>
<p>To explore the mediating role of perceived organizational support in the relationship between professional commitment and job involvement.</p>
<p>To analyze the contributions of self-efficacy and resilience in enhancing job involvement and their interaction with perceived organizational support.</p>
<p>By addressing these gaps, this study will contribute to a deeper understanding of how psychological and organizational factors influence the job involvement of female primary school teachers in non-Western settings, offering valuable insights for policymakers and school administrators aiming to enhance teacher engagement and well-being.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2</label>
<title>Theoretical deduction and research hypothesis</title>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Theoretical deduction</title>
<p>Resource Conservation Theory (COR) provides a powerful framework for analyzing how individuals manage and conserve the resources that are of value to them in order to cope with stress and improve performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Hobfoll et al., 2018</xref>). In the field of education, especially for female teachers in primary schools, they face many challenges in balancing the demands of their profession with the demands of their personal lives. These challenges not only consume their psychological and emotional resources, but also may affect their professional commitment and job involvement.</p>
<p>The career of female primary school teachers is often influenced by multiple pressures, including teaching load, expectations of students and parents, and responsibilities in personal life (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Skaalvik and Skaalvik, 2011</xref>). When these teachers perceive an imbalance between career engagement and support they receive, they may experience a sense of loss of resources, leading to burnout and reduced job efficacy. In addition, if the work environment does not provide sufficient support, such as low perceived organizational support or limited career development opportunities, teachers&#x2019; professional commitment may be affected, thereby affecting their job involvement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Liu et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Sun et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>In this context, teachers&#x2019; self-efficacy and psychological resilience become key internal resources that help them maintain professional commitment and effectively manage conflicts between their work and personal lives. Teachers with strong self-efficacy are more confident to cope with challenges in teaching, while psychological resilience enables them to maintain resilience and positive attitudes in the face of stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bandura and Wessels, 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Luthans et al., 2010</xref>). Studies have shown that when teachers have high self-efficacy and psychological resilience, they are more effective in using personal and professional resources to maintain or even enhance job involvement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Tian et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Therefore, through in-depth understanding and supporting the resource management strategies of female teachers in primary schools, we can help them better cope with the needs of their professional and personal lives, thereby improving their job satisfaction and teaching effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to explore how professional commitment, perceived organizational support, self-efficacy, and psychological resilience collectively affect the job involvement of female primary school teachers, with a view to providing theoretical and empirical support for educational administration and policy making.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Research hypothesis</title>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.2.1</label>
<title>The relationship between professional commitment and job involvement</title>
<p>According to resource conservation theory, individuals tend to protect, build, and accumulate resources that are valuable to them (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Hobfoll et al., 2018</xref>). In the field of education, teachers&#x2019; professional commitment itself can be regarded as an important psychological resource, which not only affects teachers&#x2019; personal professional identity and satisfaction, but also is the core driving force of their daily work motivation. When teachers have a higher commitment to their profession, they are more likely to devote their time, energy and even emotions to their work, thus improving the level of job involvement. This commitment is not only reflected in the quality of teaching activities, but also in the interaction with students and parents and educational innovation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Klassen and Chiu, 2010</xref>). Recent studies have also shown that teachers with high professional commitment show higher resilience and positive coping strategies in the face of educational challenges, which further promotes their continuous investment and development in their career (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Liu et al., 2021</xref>). Therefore, this study hypothesized that professional commitment could significantly and positively affect the level of teachers&#x2019; job involvement by enhancing their sense of value and satisfaction in the educational profession.</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H1</italic>: Occupational commitment has a significant positive impact on job engagement.</p>
</disp-quote>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.2.2</label>
<title>The relationship between professional commitment and perceived organizational support</title>
<p>According to the theory of resource conservation, individuals see the positive outlook of their personal value and career in positive professional attitudes and commitments, so they are more inclined to seek and use external support that can help them protect and increase these resources, such as organizational support (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Hobfoll et al., 2018</xref>). Teachers with high professional commitment are more likely to feel and rely on various supports provided by schools and educational institutions, such as training, resources and emotional support, because of their deep investment in education, which not only improves their work efficiency, but also enhances their job satisfaction and sense of belonging (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Greenberg et al., 2020</xref>). In addition, when teachers&#x2019; professional commitment is recognized, organizations usually respond to this commitment by providing more resources and support, thus forming a positive feedback loop and enhancing teachers&#x2019; sense of organizational support (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Buhari et al., 2020</xref>). This dynamic relationship suggests that professional commitment can be used as a psychological resource, and its enhancement can directly enhance teachers&#x2019; perceived organizational support, which, in turn, further consolidates and enhances teachers&#x2019; professional commitment. Therefore, this study hypothesized that there was a positive relationship between professional commitment and perceived organizational support among female primary school teachers, that is, the higher the professional commitment, the stronger the perceived organizational support.</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H2</italic>: Professional commitment has a significant positive effect on perceived organizational support.</p>
</disp-quote>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.2.3</label>
<title>Relationship between career commitment and resilience</title>
<p>According to the theory of resource preservation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Hobfoll et al., 2018</xref>), individuals tend to actively maintain and increase psychological resources that contribute to their personal and professional development. In the field of education, psychological resilience is an important psychological resource for teachers to face the challenges and pressures of daily teaching. Teachers&#x2019; professional commitment reflects their love and devotion to the profession of education, which can enhance their psychological resilience, because high commitment makes teachers more motivated to overcome difficulties and challenges in their profession (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Luthans et al., 2010</xref>). Research has shown that teachers with high commitment are more resilient and adaptable when confronted with teaching or management challenges, because they see these challenges as opportunities to achieve their career goals rather than insurmountable obstacles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Klassen and Chiu, 2010</xref>). This kind of mental resilience not only helps them maintain their professional commitment, but also promotes them to seek innovation and improvement in educational practice, thereby improving the quality of education and student satisfaction. In addition, the enhancement of psychological resilience is also positively related to teachers&#x2019; personal accomplishment and career satisfaction, which are important factors of professional commitment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Kim et al., 2021</xref>). Therefore, this study proposes that the professional commitment of female teachers in primary schools helps them to cope with the stress and challenges in the educational process more effectively by enhancing psychological resilience, which is expected to be verified in empirical research. An in-depth exploration of this relationship helps to understand how teachers can optimize the durability and success of their careers by improving mental resilience.</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H3</italic>: Professional commitment has a significant positive effect on psychological resilience.</p>
</disp-quote>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>2.2.4</label>
<title>The relationship between career commitment and self-efficacy</title>
<p>According to resource conservation theory, individuals tend to protect and accumulate resources that are valuable to them in order to reduce the loss of resources and enhance their likelihood of survival and success (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Hobfoll et al., 2018</xref>). Teachers&#x2019; self-efficacy is a key psychological resource in educational settings that describes teachers&#x2019; beliefs about their ability to accomplish teaching tasks and overcome teaching challenges. This belief is particularly important in teachers&#x2019; daily teaching activities, because it directly affects teachers&#x2019; teaching behavior and students&#x2019; learning outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bandura and Wessels, 1997</xref>). Professional commitment, as a deep emotion and identity, can significantly enhance teachers&#x2019; self-efficacy. When teachers have a strong commitment to their profession, they are more inclined to devote themselves to teaching practice, which not only increases their experience, but also improves their ability to deal with complex situations, thus enhancing their self-efficacy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Skaalvik and Skaalvik, 2014</xref>). In addition, teachers with high professional commitment are generally more willing to engage in ongoing professional development activities that further enhance their teaching skills and self-confidence, thereby reinforcing self-efficacy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bandura and Wessels, 1997</xref>). Recent research also supports this view, showing that there is a significant positive link between teachers&#x2019; professional commitment and self-efficacy, and this link is particularly important in the face of educational reform and student diversity challenges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Lestari et al., 2021</xref>). Therefore, this study anticipates that the promotion of professional commitment will significantly enhance the self-efficacy of female teachers in primary schools, which will help them participate in teaching activities more effectively and improve the quality of teaching.</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H4</italic>: Professional commitment has a significant positive effect on self-efficacy.</p>
</disp-quote>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>2.2.5</label>
<title>Relationship between perceived organizational support and job involvement</title>
<p>According to resource preservation theory, individuals strive to acquire and protect resources that help reduce stress, prevent resource loss, and promote individual well-being (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Hobfoll et al., 2018</xref>). Organizational support is an important external resource in the educational environment, which includes the provision of necessary physical resources, emotional support, career development opportunities, and effective school management and leadership. These supports can help teachers perform their teaching duties more effectively and reduce occupational stress, thereby enhancing their job involvement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Giancaspro et al., 2022</xref>). Specifically, when teachers perceive a high level of organizational support, such as through professional development training, timely feedback and recognition, and adequate teaching resources, they are more likely to feel empowered and supported, which directly enhances their professional self-esteem and satisfaction. This feeling not only increases the professional commitment of teachers, but also stimulates greater enthusiasm and participation in their work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Sun et al., 2022</xref>). In addition, organizational support can also alleviate the conflict between work and personal life, and positively affect job involvement by improving job satisfaction and quality of life (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Ratnasari, 2021</xref>). Therefore, this study hypothesized that the perceived support provided by organizations to female primary school teachers would significantly increase their job involvement. This commitment is reflected not only in daily teaching activities, but also in the long-term commitment of teachers to school development and student growth. The exploration of this relationship will provide school administrators with strategies on how to enhance teachers&#x2019; job involvement by enhancing organizational support.</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H5</italic>: Perceived organizational support has a significant positive impact on job involvement.</p>
</disp-quote>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>2.2.6</label>
<title>Relationship between psychological resilience and job involvement</title>
<p>From the perspective of resource conservation theory, psychological resilience can be viewed as a personal resource that enables individuals to prevent the loss of resources in the face of occupational stress and challenges and to cope effectively with adversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Hobfoll et al., 2018</xref>). Psychological resilience not only helps teachers to cope with the daily pressure of teaching, but also promotes their persistence and creativity in work, thus improving job involvement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Luthans et al., 2010</xref>). Specifically, teachers with high mental resilience were able to recover more quickly from setbacks and difficulties, and they tended to view challenges as opportunities for growth and learning. This positive attitude not only enhances their job satisfaction, but also stimulates their initiative and innovation in educational practice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Skaalvik and Skaalvik, 2011</xref>). Studies have shown that teachers with high resilience are more able to maintain their sense of efficiency and motivation in teaching activities, which directly affects their teaching quality and student learning outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Lestari et al., 2021</xref>). Therefore, this study anticipates that psychological resilience will have a significant positive impact on job involvement among primary school teachers. By enhancing psychological resilience, teachers can not only better cope with the pressure and challenges in their work, but also actively participate in educational innovation and school development, thus improving the overall quality and efficiency of education. The validation of this hypothesis will facilitate the development of resilience training and support procedures for teachers to enhance their career satisfaction and job performance.</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H6</italic>: psychological resilience has a significant positive effect on job involvement.</p>
</disp-quote>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>2.2.7</label>
<title>The relationship between self-efficacy and job involvement</title>
<p>According to the theory of resource conservation, self-efficacy is an important personal resource, which involves individuals&#x2019; beliefs about their ability to accomplish specific tasks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Hobfoll et al., 2018</xref>). This belief is a key factor in teachers&#x2019; ability to maintain a high level of engagement and positive performance in the face of educational challenges. Teachers with high self-efficacy believe that they can effectively manage the classroom and stimulate student learning, and this belief motivates them to adopt more active strategies in the teaching process, thereby increasing their job involvement and satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bandura and Wessels, 1997</xref>). Research has shown that teachers with a strong sense of self-efficacy are more likely to engage in teaching activities that require a high degree of cognitive and emotional involvement because they feel more capable of facing and overcoming challenges in these activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Tian et al., 2019</xref>). In addition, this self-efficacy is also associated with lower burnout and higher job satisfaction, which further demonstrates its positive impact on job involvement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Wang and Hall, 2018</xref>). Self-efficacy not only enhances teachers&#x2019; confidence in their professional ability, but also elevates their expectations of teaching results, so as to maintain persistence and innovation in the face of students&#x2019; learning problems and teaching challenges. Therefore, this study predicts that the self-efficacy of female teachers in primary schools will significantly and positively affect their job involvement. By improving teachers&#x2019; self-efficacy, we can effectively increase their teaching activity and educational achievements, thus improving the overall quality of teaching and the educational effect of the school.</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H7</italic>: Self-efficacy has a significant positive effect on job involvement.</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>Based on the above assumptions, this study constructs a model of the relationship among professional commitment, perceived organizational support, psychological resilience, self-efficacy and job involvement of female primary school teachers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Conceptual model. PC, professional commitment; POS, perceived organizational support; PR, psychological resilience; SE, self-efficacy; JI, job involvement.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-15-1465880-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3</label>
<title>Research design</title>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Questionnaire design</title>
<p>The questionnaire includes two modules: the main content and demographic variables. The main content includes five dimensions: professional commitment, perceived organizational support, psychological resilience, self-efficacy and job involvement. The Likert 5-scale was used to measure each dimension. Demographic variables mainly include age, marital status, education level, working experience, professional title and so on.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Measurement of variables</title>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>3.2.1</label>
<title>Professional commitment scale</title>
<p>In this study, we adopted the Professional Commitment Scale developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Suddaby et al. (2009)</xref> to assess the degree of professional commitment of female primary school teachers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Suddaby et al., 2009</xref>). The scale contains seven items related to the individual&#x2019;s sense of identity and strength of commitment to their profession. Participants rated each item on a five-point Likert scale (1&#x2009;=&#x2009;strongly disagree, 5&#x2009;=&#x2009;strongly agree) to reflect their level of commitment to their current career.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>3.2.2</label>
<title>Perceived organizational support scale</title>
<p>Perceived organizational support was assessed using the One-dimensional Perceived Organizational Support Scale (Survey of Perceived Organizational Support, SPOS) developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Eisenberger et al. (1997)</xref>. This study chose to use a version of 8 items from the scale, which were streamlined and adjusted to fit this study of female elementary school teachers. Participants rated their perceived organizational support on a five-point Likert scale (1&#x2009;=&#x2009;strongly disagree, 5&#x2009;=&#x2009;strongly agree). The scale is widely applicable and authoritative in the current educational environment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<label>3.2.3</label>
<title>Psychological resilience scale</title>
<p>Psychological Resilience was assessed using the Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Connor and Davidson (2003)</xref>, a 10-item scale that assesses an individual&#x2019;s resilience and adaptability in the face of adversity. The scale uses a five-point scale (1&#x2009;=&#x2009;never, 5&#x2009;=&#x2009;always), and a high score indicates that an individual has a high level of psychological resilience. The scale has been widely used in a variety of populations and has shown good reliability and validity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<label>3.2.4</label>
<title>Self-efficacy scale</title>
<p>Self-efficacy was measured according to the teacher self-efficacy scale developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Tschannen-Moran and Hoy (2001)</xref>, which covered 12 items related to teachers&#x2019; self-confidence in classroom management, motivation of students and cooperation with parents. A five-point Likert scale (1&#x2009;=&#x2009;none, 5&#x2009;=&#x2009;very many) was used for scoring. This scale can effectively measure the confidence level of teachers in dealing with daily teaching challenges.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<label>3.2.5</label>
<title>Job involvement scale</title>
<p>Job Involvement was measured by Schaufeli and Bakker&#x2019;s Simplified Job Involvement Scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Schaufeli et al., 2006</xref>), which has nine items and covers three dimensions of vitality, dedication and focus. Participants were rated on a five-point Likert scale (1&#x2009;=&#x2009;never, 5&#x2009;=&#x2009;always). This rating system helps to provide a detailed understanding of the involvement of female primary school teachers in their work.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec23">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Data collection and sampling</title>
<sec id="sec24">
<label>3.3.1</label>
<title>Sampling method</title>
<p>This study employed a convenience sampling method, selecting female primary school teachers in Hezhou City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, as the research subjects through the researcher&#x2019;s collaboration with the local education system. The use of convenience sampling was based on the limitations of time and resources, while also taking into account the cooperative relationship with the educational authorities, ensuring that a large and valid sample could be obtained quickly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Emerson, 2015</xref>). Although convenience sampling offers a practical approach, its representativeness is limited, as the sample may skew toward teachers who are more willing or available to participate, potentially introducing selection bias (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Stratton, 2021</xref>). Therefore, caution should be exercised when generalizing the results of this study. Future research can enhance representativeness by expanding the sample sources.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec25">
<label>3.3.2</label>
<title>Data collection process</title>
<p>The data collection process took place between March 1, 2024, and May 1, 2024, lasting 2 months. Data were gathered from 16 primary schools in Hezhou City, covering both urban and suburban schools to ensure that the data reflected the professional commitment and job involvement of female primary school teachers in various teaching environments. The selection of specific schools was based on two criteria: (1) the willingness of the schools to collaborate with the researcher, and (2) the presence of a sufficient number of female teachers to provide a stable sample size.</p>
<p>During the questionnaire distribution process, the researcher employed both online and offline methods. For online distribution, the researcher used school administrative systems and WeChat groups, sending the questionnaire link to school administrative staff, who then forwarded the link to all female teachers. To ensure wide coverage, the researcher also established communication channels through WeChat and QQ to answer any questions the teachers had while completing the questionnaire.</p>
<p>For offline distribution, paper questionnaires were provided for teachers who could not participate online. The researcher personally visited the schools to distribute paper questionnaires and organized on-site completion during faculty meetings at some schools. All participants were informed that their participation was entirely voluntary and anonymous, with the data being used solely for academic purposes, and strict confidentiality measures were followed throughout the process.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec26">
<label>3.3.3</label>
<title>Date overview</title>
<p>A total of 600 questionnaires were collected, of which 596 were valid, with an effective rate of 99.33%. Teachers participating in the survey are representative in terms of age, marital status, educational background, work experience and professional title, which helps to fully understand the current situation of female teachers&#x2019; professional commitment and job involvement in primary schools. In terms of age distribution, there are 130 teachers aged 18&#x2013;29, accounting for 21.81%, 185 teachers aged 30&#x2013;39, accounting for 31.04%, 190 teachers aged 40&#x2013;49, accounting for 31.88%, and 91 teachers aged 50 and above, accounting for 15.27%. This age distribution is helpful to analyze the impact of different life cycle stages on career commitment and work engagement. In terms of marital status, there were 108 unmarried teachers, accounting for 18.12%, 467 married teachers, accounting for 78.36%, and 21 divorced teachers, accounting for 3.52%. Marital status may affect teachers&#x2019; job involvement and professional commitment, especially married teachers may face the dual pressures of family and work. In terms of education level, there are 4 teachers with senior high school education background or below, accounting for 0.67%; 113 teachers with junior college education background, accounting for 18.96%; 474 teachers with bachelor&#x2019;s degree, accounting for 79.53%; 5 teachers with master&#x2019;s degree or above, accounting for 0.84%. This reflects the current prevalence of higher education levels among primary school teachers. In terms of working experience, there are 151 teachers with working experience of 1&#x2013;5&#x2009;years, accounting for 25.34%; 140 teachers with working experience of 6&#x2013;10&#x2009;years, accounting for 23.49%; 70 teachers with working experience of 11&#x2013;20&#x2009;years, accounting for 11.74%; There are 235 teachers with more than 20&#x2009;years, accounting for 39.43%. This indicates that a considerable number of teachers participating in the survey are experienced senior teachers. The structure of professional titles shows that there are 207 teachers with junior professional titles, accounting for 34.73%; 179 teachers with intermediate professional titles, accounting for 30.03%; 159 teachers with senior professional titles, accounting for 26.68%; There are 51 ungraded teachers, accounting for 8.56%. The structure of professional titles reflects the hierarchy of teachers&#x2019; professional development and the difference of their professional achievements. These data provide rich background information for this study, which is helpful to deeply analyze the psychodynamics of professional commitment and job involvement of female teachers in primary schools, and further understand the complex factors behind them and their interactions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec27">
<label>4</label>
<title>Data analysis</title>
<sec id="sec28">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Reliability and validity of the scale</title>
<p>Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the reliability and validity of the scale. The reliability was tested by combined reliability (C. R.) and Cronbach&#x2019;s <italic>&#x03B1;</italic> coefficient. The C. R and Cronbach&#x2019;s <italic>&#x03B1;</italic> coefficient of each dimension were greater than 0.7, indicating that the internal consistency reliability of the scale was good (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Guilford, 1954</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Hair et al., 2020</xref>). Convergent validity was tested by factor loading and average variance extraction (AVE), and the standardized loading coefficients were all greater than 0.6, and all index factor loadings in the model were significantly different at 0.01, and AVE were all greater than 0.5, indicating that the convergent validity of each dimension of the measurement model was good (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). Discriminant validity means that there is a low correlation or significant difference between the latent trait represented by a latent variable and the traits represented by other latent variables (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Hair et al., 2020</xref>). The square root of AVE of each latent variable was greater than the correlation coefficient between the latent variable and other latent variables, and the discriminant validity was good (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Reliability and validity of the scale.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Factor</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Measured item</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Coef.</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Std. error</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>z</italic> (CR value)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Std. estimate</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Reliability</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Combined reliability</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Convergent validity</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PC</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">PC1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.778</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.931</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.953</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.672</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="top">PC2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.341</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.061</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22.143</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.823</td>
<td rowspan="6"/>
<td rowspan="6"/>
<td rowspan="6"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="top">PC3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.419</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.059</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24.173</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.881</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4"/>
<td align="left" valign="top">PC4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.425</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.068</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">21.048</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.791</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">PC5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.107</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.048</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22.844</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.844</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">PC6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.162</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.052</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22.456</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.833</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">PC7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.022</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.049</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20.753</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.782</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">POS</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">POS1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.906</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.963</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.963</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.767</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="top">POS2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.027</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.027</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38.231</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.924</td>
<td rowspan="7"/>
<td rowspan="7"/>
<td rowspan="7"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="top">POS3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.028</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.027</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">37.777</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.920</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5"/>
<td align="left" valign="top">POS4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.934</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.026</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35.376</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.898</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">POS5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.829</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.029</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28.447</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.819</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">POS6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.852</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.035</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24.661</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.761</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">POS7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.926</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.027</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">34.089</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.886</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">POS8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.884</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.026</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33.372</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.878</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PR</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">PR1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.776</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.965</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.965</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.735</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="top">PR2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.268</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.052</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24.196</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.870</td>
<td rowspan="9"/>
<td rowspan="9"/>
<td rowspan="9"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="top">PR3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.167</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.050</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23.407</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.849</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="7"/>
<td align="left" valign="top">PR4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.154</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.049</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23.763</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.859</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">PR5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.242</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.054</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23.169</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.842</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">PR6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.307</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.056</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23.422</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.849</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">PR7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.362</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.054</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25.185</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.897</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">PR8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.422</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.058</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24.571</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.881</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">PR9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.310</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.056</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23.506</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.852</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">PR10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.311</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.052</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25.017</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.892</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">SE</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">SE1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.704</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.963</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.964</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.689</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="top">SE2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.141</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.056</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20.486</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.860</td>
<td rowspan="11"/>
<td rowspan="11"/>
<td rowspan="11"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="top">SE3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.201</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.058</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20.790</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.873</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="9"/>
<td align="left" valign="top">SE4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.202</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.058</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20.610</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.865</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SE5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.213</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.064</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19.037</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.798</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SE6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.161</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.060</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19.484</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.817</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SE7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.231</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.063</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19.600</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.822</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SE8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.112</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.055</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20.104</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.844</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SE9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.068</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.055</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19.461</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.816</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SE10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.168</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.059</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19.881</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.834</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SE11</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.191</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.058</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20.439</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.858</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SE12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.143</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.056</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">20.417</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.857</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">JI</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">JI1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.88</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.955</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.961</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.734</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="top">JI2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.039</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.029</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35.269</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.924</td>
<td rowspan="8"/>
<td rowspan="8"/>
<td rowspan="8"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="top">JI3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.069</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.029</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">36.679</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.939</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="6"/>
<td align="left" valign="top">JI4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.113</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.031</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">36.130</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.933</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">JI</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.153</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.040</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28.672</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.842</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">JI5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.174</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.042</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27.740</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.828</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">JI6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.142</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.036</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31.617</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.882</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">JI7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.092</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.036</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30.411</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.867</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">JI8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.863</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.058</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14.774</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.545</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Latent variable discriminant validity test.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">PC</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">POS</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">PR</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SE</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">JI</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PC</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>0.811</bold>
</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">POS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.692</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>0.876</bold>
</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.490</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.516</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>0.866</bold>
</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">SE</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.434</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.424</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.609</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>0.847</bold>
</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">JI</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.551</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.573</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.717</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.607</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>0.847</bold>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>The bold diagonal values represent the square root of AVE, and the lower triangle shows the Pearson correlations between dimensions.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec29">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Model fitting test</title>
<p>The goodness of fit of the model reflects how well the theoretical model aligns with the actual data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Byrne, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Guilford, 1954</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Nunally and Bernstein, 1978</xref>). To further improve the model&#x2019;s fit, we applied the modification indices method by correlating the error terms of items with high residual values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Baumgartner and Homburg, 1996</xref>). This technique helps to increase the GFI value while maintaining the theoretical integrity of the model. The test results showed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>. The <italic>&#x03C7;</italic><sup>2</sup>/DF value, which indicates a good fit when between 1 and 3, is 3.469, suggesting the model fits the data reasonably well. SRMR (0.04) and RMSEA (0.064) are within the acceptable limits, indicating that the model is adequately specified. For GFI, AGFI, IFI, CFI, and TLI, values close to 1 are ideal, with 0.90 being a typical threshold. The GFI of 0.841 is slightly below the ideal threshold of 0.90. However, it is within the acceptable range as suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Doll et al. (1994)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Baumgartner and Homburg (1996)</xref>, who state that a GFI value above 0.80 can be considered acceptable. Other indices, such as AGFI (0.817), IFI (0.941), CFI (0.941), and TLI (0.936), indicate a good fit of the data to the model. Furthermore, Harman&#x2019;s single factor exhibited 21.69% shared variance, presenting that the CMV (common method variance) is statistically insignificant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Harman, 1976</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Model fit test.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Model fitting index</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>&#x03C7;</italic><sup>2</sup>/df</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SRMR</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">RMSEA</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">AGFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">IFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">CFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">TLI</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Reference value</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Testing value</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.469</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.064</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.841</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.817</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.941</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.941</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.936</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec30">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Hypothesis testing</title>
<p>The test results showed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Test results of path relationship.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Assumptions</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Path</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Non-standardized coefficient</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SE</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>Z</italic> (CR value)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">
<italic>p</italic>
</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Standardized coefficients</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Hypothesis testing</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">H1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PC&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;JI</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.164</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.043</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.786</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.159</td>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Set up</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">H2</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PC&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;POS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.706</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.031</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">23.029</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.686</td>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Set up</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">H3</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PC&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;PR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.449</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.033</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.574</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.486</td>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Set up</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">H4</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PC&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;SE</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.316</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.028</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.424</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.424</td>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Set up</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">H5</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">POS&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;JI</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.165</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.037</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.442</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.165</td>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Set up</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">H6</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PR&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;JI</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.513</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.034</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.915</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.460</td>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Set up</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">H7</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">SE&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;JI</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.312</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.041</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.601</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.226</td>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Set up</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>When professional commitment affected perceived organizational support, the standardized path coefficient value was 0.686&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0, and this path showed a significant level of 0.01 (<italic>Z</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;23.029, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.000&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01), indicating that professional commitment had a significant positive effect on perceived organizational support.</p>
<p>When professional commitment affected psychological resilience, the standardized path coefficient value was 0.486&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0, and this path showed a significance at the 0.01 level (<italic>Z</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;13.574, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.000&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01), indicating that professional commitment had a significant positive effect on psychological resilience.</p>
<p>When professional commitment affected self-efficacy, the standardized path coefficient value was 0.424&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0, and this path showed a significant level of 0.01 (<italic>Z</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;11.424, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.000&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01), indicating that professional commitment had a significant positive effect on self-efficacy.</p>
<p>When professional commitment affected job involvement, the standardized path coefficient value was 0.165&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0, and this path showed a significance at the 0.01 level (<italic>Z</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;4.442, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.000&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01), indicating that professional commitment had a significant positive effect on job involvement.</p>
<p>When perceived organizational support affected job involvement, the standardized path coefficient value was 0.159&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0, and this path showed a significance at the 0.01 level (<italic>Z</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;3.786, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.000&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01), indicating that perceived organizational support had a significant positive effect on job involvement.</p>
<p>When psychological resilience affected job involvement, the standardized path coefficient value was 0.460&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0, and this path showed a significance at the 0.01 level (<italic>Z</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;14.915, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.000&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01), indicating that psychological resilience had a significant positive effect on job involvement.</p>
<p>When self-efficacy affected job involvement, the standardized path coefficient value was 0.226&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0, and this path showed a significance at the 0.01 level (<italic>Z</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;7.601, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.000&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01), indicating that self-efficacy had a significant positive effect on job involvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec31">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Mediating effect test</title>
<p>This study uses the SPSS PROCESS macro developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Hayes (2012)</xref> to test the mediation effects of professional commitment (PC) on job involvement (JI) through self-efficacy (SE), psychological resilience (PR), and perceived organizational support (POS). The results, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref>, revealed the following: firstly, professional commitment had a direct significant positive effect on job involvement (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.164, <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.000), confirming the main effect. Secondly, the mediating effects of self-efficacy, psychological resilience, and perceived organizational support were tested. Self-efficacy mediated 16.224% of the total effect, psychological resilience mediated 37.807%, and perceived organizational support mediated 19.117%, all showing partial mediation. Finally, to verify the robustness of these mediating effects, the Bootstrap method was used with 1,000 resamplings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Diciccio and Romano, 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Hayes and Rockwood, 2017</xref>). The results confirmed significant mediating effects within the 95% confidence intervals:</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Results of mediating effect test.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Path</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Total effect</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Mediate effect</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">S.D.</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>z</italic>-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">95% boot CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Direct effect</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Percentage</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Result</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PC&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;SE&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;JI</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.609&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.099</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.020</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.874</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.053&#x2013;0.134</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.164&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.224%</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Partial mediation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PC&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;PR&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;JI</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.609&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.230</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.029</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.896</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.155&#x2013;0.270</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.164&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">37.807%</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Partial mediation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PC&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;POS&#x2009;&#x2192;&#x2009;JI</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.609&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.117</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.030</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.916</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.048&#x2013;0.170</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.164&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19.117%</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Partial mediation</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>&#x002A;indicates <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05; &#x002A;&#x002A;indicates <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01; &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;indicates <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<disp-quote>
<p>Self-efficacy: indirect effect&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.099, 95% CI [0.053, 0.134].</p>
<p>Psychological resilience: indirect effect&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.230, 95% CI [0.155, 0.270].</p>
<p>Perceived organizational support: indirect effect&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.117, 95% CI [0.048, 0.170].</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>This further validated the hypothesis that self-efficacy, psychological resilience, and perceived organizational support serve as significant mediators between professional commitment and job involvement.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec32">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion and discussion</title>
<sec id="sec33">
<label>5.1</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Through the in-depth analysis of the psychodynamic relationships among professional commitment, self-efficacy, psychological resilience, perceived organizational support and job involvement of female teachers in Chinese primary schools, this study reveals the interaction and influence mechanism among these variables. The results show that professional commitment plays a central role in the job involvement of female elementary school teachers, and self-efficacy and psychological resilience, as individual psychological resources, play an important role in promoting professional commitment and job involvement.</p>
<p>On the one hand, there is a significant positive relationship between professional commitment and job involvement, indicating that the stronger the professional commitment, the higher the job involvement of teachers. This finding is consistent with the resource conservation theory that individuals tend to protect and accumulate resources that are valuable to them. In this study, professional commitment itself can be regarded as an important psychological resource, which affects teachers&#x2019; professional identity and satisfaction, and is also the core driving force of their daily work motivation.</p>
<p>On the other hand, perceived organizational support, as an external resource, can significantly enhance teachers&#x2019; professional commitment, and promote their job involvement by enhancing teachers&#x2019; self-efficacy and resilience. This suggests that educational administrators and policy makers should pay attention to establishing a supportive work environment to help teachers better cope with professional challenges and stimulate their inner potential by providing necessary material and emotional support.</p>
<p>In addition, psychological resilience and self-efficacy, as mediating variables, played an important role in the relationship between professional commitment and job involvement. This shows that in the process of improving the professional commitment and job involvement of female teachers in primary schools, we need to pay attention not only to their external environment and support, but also to the cultivation of their internal psychological resources.</p>
<p>In conclusion, this study not only provides new insights for theory, but also provides important guidance for practical application, that is, through enhancing professional commitment, self-efficacy, psychological resilience and perceived organizational support, female teachers in primary schools can effectively enhance their job involvement, thus improving the quality of education and student development. This provides important implications for future educational practice and policy making (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Psychodynamics of professional commitment and job involvement of female primary school teachers. &#x002A;indicates <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05; &#x002A;&#x002A;indicates <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01; &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;indicates <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-15-1465880-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec34">
<label>5.2</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The findings of this study are consistent with and extend several prior studies on job involvement, professional commitment, and psychological resilience among teachers. For example, the positive relationship between self-efficacy and job involvement observed in this study aligns with the work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Tschannen-Moran and Hoy (2001)</xref>, who found that teachers with higher levels of self-efficacy tend to be more engaged and committed to their work. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Bakker and Demerouti (2008)</xref> also emphasized that teachers who believe in their ability to overcome challenges are more likely to experience higher levels of job satisfaction and involvement. Our findings build on these results by demonstrating that self-efficacy not only enhances job involvement but also mediates the relationship between professional commitment and perceived organizational support.</p>
<p>Furthermore, this study supports the conclusions of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Wang (2024)</xref>, who highlighted the importance of perceived organizational support in reducing teacher burnout and promoting well-being. Our results extend this by showing that organizational support plays a crucial role in enhancing resilience, which, in turn, positively influences job involvement. This reinforces the Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Hobfoll et al. (2018)</xref>, which posits that individuals who perceive strong organizational support are better able to mobilize internal resources like resilience to mitigate the negative effects of job stress.</p>
<p>However, our study diverges from previous research in certain areas. For instance, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Madigan and Kim (2021)</xref> focused on the role of resilience in reducing turnover intentions, our findings suggest that resilience plays a more direct role in enhancing job involvement. This highlights the importance of resilience not only as a protective factor against burnout but also as a proactive contributor to teacher engagement and performance.</p>
<p>This study addresses key gaps in the literature by exploring how self-efficacy, resilience, and organizational support interact to influence job involvement, particularly in the context of female primary school teachers in China. Previous research, such as that by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Bakker and Demerouti (2008)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Skaalvik and Skaalvik (2014</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">2017)</xref>, has largely focused on Western educational settings, with limited attention to the unique socio-cultural challenges faced by teachers in non-Western contexts. By focusing on Chinese female teachers, this study contributes to a broader understanding of how cultural expectations and gender roles influence professional commitment and job involvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec35">
<label>5.3</label>
<title>Inspiration</title>
<p>The results of this study provide important practical guidance for educational policy makers and school administrators to improve teachers&#x2019; job involvement and educational quality. The following are some implications based on the research results.</p>
<p>Strengthening teachers&#x2019; professional commitment: In view of the significant positive impact of professional commitment on job involvement, schools and educational institutions should strengthen teachers&#x2019; professional commitment through positive professional culture and recognition mechanism. For example, teachers&#x2019; recognition conferences can be held regularly to publicly praise teachers&#x2019; excellent teaching and innovative practices, so as to enhance teachers&#x2019; professional identity and satisfaction.</p>
<p>Provide comprehensive organizational support: Perceived organizational support is the key to enhance teachers&#x2019; professional commitment and job engagement. Administrators should ensure that teachers have access to necessary resources, including instructional materials, technical support, and professional development opportunities. At the same time, support for teachers&#x2019; personal lives, such as flexible working arrangements and mental health services, should be strengthened to help them better balance work and family life.</p>
<p>Develop teachers&#x2019; self-efficacy and psychological resilience: Educational institutions should set up special training programs aimed at improving teachers&#x2019; self-efficacy and psychological resilience. This can be achieved through workshops, seminars and team building activities, particularly those focused on teaching strategies, emotional management and stress coping skills.</p>
<p>Strengthen the communication between leaders and teachers: a good communication mechanism can enhance teachers&#x2019; organizational support. Leaders should regularly communicate with teachers to understand their needs and challenges and provide timely feedback and support. In addition, a transparent decision-making process and teacher participation mechanism should be established so that teachers feel that their voices are heard and valued.</p>
<p>Create a supportive work environment: Educational institutions should work to create an inclusive, supportive, and stimulating work environment. This includes implementing fair evaluation systems, providing career growth paths, and promoting diversity and inclusion in the workplace.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec36">
<label>5.4</label>
<title>Future recommendations</title>
<p>While this study provides valuable insights into the relationship between professional commitment, perceived organizational support, self-efficacy, and job involvement among female primary school teachers in China, it also raises several important questions that future research can explore.</p>
<p>First, this study employed a cross-sectional design, which limits the ability to infer causality. Future research could benefit from employing a longitudinal approach to track changes in job involvement and professional commitment over time. Such studies could provide a more dynamic understanding of how self-efficacy and resilience develop as teachers gain more experience and face new challenges. Longitudinal studies could also explore how the cumulative effects of organizational support impact job involvement in the long term (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Kline, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Wang, 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>Second, while this research focused on female teachers in China, it would be valuable to extend this work to other cultural settings or different professional groups. For instance, future studies could investigate whether similar relationships exist in male teachers or in non-educational professions where job involvement and organizational support are also critical. By conducting cross-cultural comparisons, researchers can explore whether the findings of this study are generalizable across different educational systems or cultural contexts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Bakker and Demerouti, 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>Third, additional variables such as emotional intelligence, job satisfaction, or work-life balance could be integrated into future models to gain a more holistic understanding of the factors that influence teacher engagement. Emotional intelligence, in particular, has been found to play a crucial role in mitigating stress and enhancing resilience, and it would be valuable to see how this interacts with other psychological resources like self-efficacy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Tschannen-Moran and Hoy, 2001</xref>). Moreover, job satisfaction could serve as a potential mediator between professional commitment and job involvement, providing deeper insights into the motivational factors that drive teacher engagement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">George et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Finally, this study opens the door to intervention-based research that explores strategies to enhance teachers&#x2019; resilience and self-efficacy through professional development programs or organizational support initiatives. Future researchers could design and implement interventions to test the effectiveness of resilience training or leadership development programs aimed at improving organizational support. Such interventions could offer practical solutions for educational institutions seeking to improve teacher well-being and performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Hobfoll et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Liu and Yu, 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>By exploring these areas, future studies can build on the findings of this research, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of teacher job involvement and the factors that enhance professional commitment and well-being.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec37">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec38">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent from the [patients/participants OR patients/participants legal guardian/next of kin] was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec39">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>QS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec40">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec41">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec42">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="confproc"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allam</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asad</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Visualization of knowledge aspects on workplace spirituality through bibliometric analysis</article-title>. <conf-name>2021 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA)</conf-name>,</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="confproc"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allam</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asad</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Malik</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Bibliometric analysis of research visualizations of knowledge aspects on burnout among teachers from 2012 to January 2022</article-title>. <conf-name>2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA)</conf-name>,</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Atteh</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oduro</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mensah</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gyamfi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>An overview on influence of work-family life conflict among female teachers and their job satisfaction in schools</article-title>. <source>Asian J. Educ. Soc. Stud.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>48</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9734/ajess/2020/v9i230245</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bakker</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Demerouti</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Towards a model of work engagement</article-title>. <source>Career Dev. Int.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>223</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/13620430810870476</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bandura</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wessels</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <source>Self-efficacy</source>. <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baumgartner</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Homburg</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: a review</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Res. Mark.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>139</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>161</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buhari</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yong</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>I am more committed to my profession than to my organization: professional commitment and perceived organizational support in turnover</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Hum. Capital Informat. Technol. Profession.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4018/IJHCITP.2020070103</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Byrne</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <source>Structural equation modeling with Mplus: basic concepts, applications, and programming</source>: <publisher-name>Routledge</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Connor</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davidson</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC)</article-title>. <source>Depress. Anxiety</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>76</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/da.10113</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Diciccio</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Romano</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>A review of bootstrap confidence intervals</article-title>. <source>J. R. Stat. Soc. Stat. Methodol.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>338</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>354</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.2517-6161.1988.tb01732.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Doll</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Torkzadeh</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument</article-title>. <source>MIS Q.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>453</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>461</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/249524</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edinger</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edinger</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Improving teacher job satisfaction: the roles of social capital, teacher efficacy, and support</article-title>. <source>J. Psychol.</source> <volume>152</volume>, <fpage>573</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>593</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00223980.2018.1489364</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30325726</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eisenberger</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cummings</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Armeli</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Psychol.</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>812</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>820</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.812</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9337610</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Emerson</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Convenience sampling, random sampling, and snowball sampling: how does sampling affect the validity of research?</article-title> <source>J. Visual Impair. Blind.</source> <volume>109</volume>, <fpage>164</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>168</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0145482X1510900215</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>George</surname> <given-names>O. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Okon</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akaighe</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Emotional intelligence and work engagement: a serial mediation model</article-title>. <source>J. Organizat. Effect. People Performan.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>211</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/JOEPP-02-2021-0025</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Giancaspro</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Callea</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manuti</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>&#x201C;I like it like that&#x201D;: a study on the relationship between psychological capital</article-title>. <source>Work Engag. Extra Role Behavior. Sustain.</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>2022</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su14042022</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Greenberg</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Docherty</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gnanapragasam</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wessely</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid-19 pandemic</article-title>. <source>BMJ</source> <volume>368</volume>:<fpage>m1211</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/bmj.m1211</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guilford</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1954</year>). <source>Psychometric methods</source>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hair</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Howard</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nitzl</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis</article-title>. <source>J. Bus. Res.</source> <volume>109</volume>, <fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harman</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1976</year>). <source>Modern factor analysis</source>: <publisher-name>University of Chicago Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hayes</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <source>PROCESS: a versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling</source>: <publisher-name>University of Kansas, KS</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hayes</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rockwood</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: observations, recommendations, and implementation</article-title>. <source>Behav. Res. Ther.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27865431</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hobfoll</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Halbesleben</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neveu</surname> <given-names>J.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Westman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>103</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>128</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kanaan</surname> <given-names>O. A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asad</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taamnha</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Qudah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>A mediated moderated analysis of knowledge management and stakeholder relationships between open innovation and performance of entrepreneurial firms</article-title>. <source>Uncertain Supply Chain Manag.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>2383</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2398</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5267/j.uscm.2024.5.028</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Factors affecting pandemic biosecurity behaviors of international travelers: moderating roles of gender, age, and travel frequency</article-title>. <source>Sustain. For.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>12332</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su132112332</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Klassen</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chiu</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Effects on teachers' self-efficacy and job satisfaction: teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress</article-title>. <source>J. Educ. Psychol.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>741</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>756</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/a0019237</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kline</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <source>A handbook of test construction (psychology revivals): Introduction to psychometric design</source>: <publisher-name>Routledge</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raj</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salem</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>E. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goel</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhatia</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>The interplay of organisational culture, transformational leadership and organisation innovativeness: evidence from India</article-title>. <source>Asian Bus. Manag.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>180</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>210</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1057/s41291-023-00230-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lestari</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Izzati</surname> <given-names>U. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adhe</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Indriani</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Professional commitment: its effect on kindergarten Teachers' organizational citizenship behavior</article-title>. <source>Cypriot J. Educ. Sci.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>2037</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2048</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18844/cjes.v16i4.6072</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Kindergarten organizational climate and teachers&#x2019; job involvement: mediating role of teaching efficacy</article-title>. <source>Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2224/sbp.13120</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Association of organizational behavior with work engagement and work-home conflicts of physician in China</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</source> <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>5405</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph18105405</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34069341</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luthans</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avey</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avolio</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peterson</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The development and resulting performance impact of positive psychological capital</article-title>. <source>Hum. Resour. Dev. Q.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/hrdq.20034</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Madigan</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Towards an understanding of teacher attrition: a meta-analysis of burnout, job satisfaction, and teachers&#x2019; intentions to quit</article-title>. <source>Teach. Teach. Educ.</source> <volume>105</volume>:<fpage>103425</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tate.2021.103425</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9023"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll230">Ministry of Education</collab></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Number of full-time teachers in primary schools by academic qualifications and professional rank (Total). Ministry of Education.</article-title> Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/moe_560/2022/gedi/202401/t20240111_1099709.html" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/moe_560/2022/gedi/202401/t20240111_1099709.html</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nunally</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernstein</surname> <given-names>I. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <source>Psychometric theory</source>. <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>McGraw-Hill</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ratnasari</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The importance of organizational commitment and job satisfaction on work productivity and intention to quit in the covid 19 pandemic era</article-title>. <source>Bus. Excellence Manag.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>237</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>247</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24818/beman/2021.S.I.2-18</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saleem</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qureshi</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Task challenge and employee performance: a moderated mediation model of resilience and digitalization</article-title>. <source>Behav. Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>119</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/bs13020119</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36829348</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schaufeli</surname> <given-names>W. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bakker</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salanova</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study</article-title>. <source>Educ. Psychol. Meas.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>701</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>716</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0013164405282471</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Skaalvik</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skaalvik</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion</article-title>. <source>Teach. Teach. Educ.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>1029</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1038</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Skaalvik</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skaalvik</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion</article-title>. <source>Psychol. Rep.</source> <volume>114</volume>, <fpage>68</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2466/14.02.PR0.114k14w0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24765710</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Skaalvik</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skaalvik</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Teacher stress and teacher self-efficacy: relations and consequences</article-title>. <source>Educ. Stress</source>, <fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-53053-6_5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stratton</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Population research: convenience sampling strategies</article-title>. <source>Prehosp. Disaster Med.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>374</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S1049023X21000649</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suddaby</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gendron</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The organizational context of professionalism in accounting</article-title>. <source>Acc. Organ. Soc.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>409</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>427</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeyaraj</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Moderating role of enterprise social media use in work engagement</article-title>. <source>Inf. Process. Manag.</source> <volume>59</volume>:<fpage>102793</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102793</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Self-efficacy and work performance: the role of work engagement</article-title>. <source>Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2224/sbp.8528</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tschannen-Moran</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoy</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct</article-title>. <source>Teach. Teach. Educ.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>783</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>805</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Youngs</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barber</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brick</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chadha</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>&#x201C;I must do this!&#x201D;: a latent profile analysis approach to understanding the role of irrational beliefs and motivation regulation in mental and physical health</article-title>. <source>J. Sports Sci.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>934</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>949</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02640414.2022.2042124</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35220909</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Exploring the impact of workload, organizational support, and work engagement on teachers&#x2019; psychological wellbeing: a structural equation modeling approach</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>1345740</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1345740</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38314257</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>A systematic review of teachers&#x2019; causal attributions: prevalence, correlates, and consequences</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>2305</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02305</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30618897</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Modeling the effect of Chinese EFL teachers&#x2019; self-efficacy and resilience on their work engagement: a structural equation modeling analysis</article-title>. <source>SAGE Open</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>21582440231214329</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/21582440231214329</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>