<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Psychol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Psychology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Psychol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-1078</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1402159</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Psychology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The impact of care-recipient relationship type on mental health burden of caregivers for schizophrenia patients: evidence from Beijing, China</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Yi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2641434/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>Margaret Xi Can</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2361022/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>School of Public Administration, Northwest University</institution>, <addr-line>Xi&#x2019;an</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>School of Humanities, Southeast University</institution>, <addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: Yi Nam Suen, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: Sasidhar Gunturu, Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center, United States</p>
<p>Massimo Tusconi, University of Cagliari, Italy</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Margaret Xi Can Yin, <email>xicanyin@connect.hku.hk</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>14</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1402159</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>17</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>05</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2024 Zhu and Yin.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zhu and Yin</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="sec1">
<title>Objective</title>
<p>To examine the impact of care-recipient relationship type on mental health burden of caregivers for schizophrenia patients in China, elucidating the underlying mechanisms.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2">
<title>Methods</title>
<p>A cross-sectional study was conducted using face-to-face surveys administered to caregivers of patients with schizophrenia in selected communities in Beijing, China. 1,853 samples&#x2019; data was used. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression models and Sheaf coefficient method were employed to analyze the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Results</title>
<p>The mental health burden experienced by caregivers of schizophrenia patients has reached a high level, with 66.9% reporting a moderate or severe impact from their caregiving responsibilities. Parents and spouses were the primary providers of care for schizophrenia patients in China. Parent caregivers experienced greater suffering in their caregiving role compared to spouse caregivers, whereas the difference between child caregivers and spouse caregivers was not significant. The factors influencing caregiver&#x2019;s mental health burden vary according to the type of relationship with the care-recipient. For parent caregivers, the mental health burden primarily stems from personal conditions of schizophrenia patients, while for spouse or child caregivers, it mainly arises from family economic conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study reveals that caregivers having different types of care-recipient relationship with schizophrenia patients experience significantly different mental health burdens in Beijing, China, and major influencing factors are distinct according to different care-recipient relationship types.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>care-recipient relationship type</kwd>
<kwd>caregivers&#x2019; mental health burden</kwd>
<kwd>schizophrenia patients</kwd>
<kwd>China</kwd>
<kwd>influencing factors</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="1"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="4"/>
<ref-count count="52"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="7206"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Health Psychology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec5">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Schizophrenia is a debilitating mental illness, which compromises cognitive functions, disrupts interpersonal dynamics, and engenders emotional, social, and economic hardships (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Vigo et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Onitsuka et al., 2022</xref>). Caregivers hold a crucial role in the lives of patients with schizophrenia. They provide direct care, assistance with activities of daily living, and emotional, social, and financial support to patients with schizophrenia, but their mental health can often be overlooked by the public (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Prasad et al., 2024</xref>). With the deinstitutionalization movement in the West, 25 to 50% of individuals with schizophrenia receive care within the community or from their families, with this figure rising to as high as 70% in Asian countries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Chan, 2011</xref>). Caring for patients with schizophrenia poses unique challenges due to the multifaceted nature of the illness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Juntapim and Nuntaboot, 2018</xref>). Caregivers of patients with persistent symptoms often feel overwhelmed, stressed, drained, burdened, frustrated, or angry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Kamil and Velligan, 2019</xref>). The burden of caregiving for family members is characterized as &#x201C;a psychological state resulting from a combination of physical labor, emotional and social pressures, and economic constraints associated with caring for the patients&#x201D; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Dillehay and Sandys, 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Chen et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Family or informal caregiving burden is a global challenge (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Hsiao and Tsai, 2015</xref>). Providing care to family members may bring heavy burden for caregivers which are often overlooked. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Hoenig and Hamilton (1966)</xref> have categorized the caregiving burden into two distinct types for family members: objective burden and subjective burden. Objective burden refers to the impacts on health, financial cost, or daily life chores, while subjective burden pertains to the psychological pressure perceived by the caregiver from the care activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Awad and Voruganti, 2008</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Caqueo-Ur&#x00ED;zar et al. (2009)</xref> summarized the quality of life of caregivers and found that their health deteriorates, leading to stress, anxiety, and depression during the caregiving process. For caregivers of schizophrenia patients, the increased duration of illness and care, severe or persistent schizophrenia symptoms, criticism of the care recipient, financial burden, and patient disability intensify their caregiving burden (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Kamil and Velligan, 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Caregiver burden is significantly influenced by the type of relationship with the care recipient (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Lai et al., 2022</xref>). Caregiver&#x2019;s role is often perceived primarily in terms of the effects of caregiving (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Schulz et al., 2020</xref>), especially among family caregivers. For instance, there were significant differences in physiological function, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social function, mental health, each dimension of social support, and quality of life among caregivers having different relationships with the patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Li et al., 2017</xref>). Providing care within families can negatively impact the relationship quality between caregiver and recipient. Extensive literature demonstrate that, in the case of spousal caregivers of individuals with dementia, behavioral symptoms such as negative emotional expression pose challenges for caregivers, leading to a decline in relationship satisfaction and a reduction in emotional and physical intimacy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Simonelli et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Ascher et al., 2010</xref>). Among spousal caregivers of older adults with multiple chronic conditions, both caregivers and care recipients experience lowered relationship satisfaction when facing depressive symptoms and lowered self-reported health. This effect is particularly pronounced for care recipients experiencing high levels of depression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Monin and Schulz, 2009</xref>). However, these aspects are relatively underexplored regarding to caregivers for patients with schizophrenia.</p>
<p>Although the influence of care-recipient relationship type on mental health burden of caregivers has received some attention, several issues persist. Firstly, care-recipients are often the elderly, adolescents, or other minority groups, such as cancer patients, meaning that relatively few studies have focused on caregivers of schizophrenia patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Ferraris et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Chen and Li, 2023</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Peng et al. (2023)</xref> used a Chinese version of the Family Questionnaire and found that in China, parents or spouses scored higher in emotional over involvement with schizophrenia patients compared to siblings, but no significant difference existed between fathers, mothers, or spouses. Secondly, most existing studies concentrated on the characteristics or correlations of factors influencing caregivers&#x2019; quality of life, lacking research on specific issues such as the impact of caregiver&#x2019;s mental health burden (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Srivastava, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Chua et al., 2023</xref>). Additionally, the number of research interviewees or samples typically does not exceed 500 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Reinhard and Horwitz, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Knock et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Chen et al., 2019</xref>). Therefore, exploring the influence of care-recipient relationship type on mental health burden of caregivers of schizophrenia patients using a larger sample size is of great significance.</p>
<p>The care-recipient relationship type can be categorized into four main types: parents, spouses, adult children, or other relationships (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Kamil and Velligan, 2019</xref>). In the case of parental caregivers, Cook&#x2019;s study in the US found that both parents, particularly mothers, of patients with mental illness experienced high levels of emotional distress, including anxiety, depression, fear, and emotional drain, with mothers often reporting higher degrees compared to fathers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Cook, 1988</xref>). Parental caregivers may experience increased stress due to concerns about the safety of their child and others, especially when the mental condition of the patient is unstable. Additionally, in rural China, parental caregivers may face stigma related to mental illness, leading to discrimination by neighbors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Peng et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>For spousal caregivers and child caregivers, whether wives or husbands, the risk is high as they often bear the burden of caregiving without additional support (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Cohen et al., 1993</xref>). Previous studies suggested that spousal caregivers experienced heightened stress and may also face significant pressures regarding work and household responsibilities if their partners were unable to contribute to family financial obligations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Peng et al., 2019</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Li and Dai (2019)</xref> found that in China, spouses were often assumed to be responsible of caregiving, even when living with their adult children. Research from South Korea also indicated that spousal caregivers perceived more burden overall compared to adult child caregivers, while sons perceived less burden than daughters in most areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Hong and Kim, 2008</xref>). Using Italian data, Rinaldi, Spazzafumo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Rinaldi et al., 2005</xref>) found that compared to friends or other relative caregivers, adult child or spousal caregivers of dementia patients have a higher risk of burden and distress.</p>
<p>For other relative caregivers, such as siblings, caregiving can be particularly stressful as it may not align with normative caregiving roles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Avioli, 1989</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Yeager et al. (2010)</xref> found that family members reported more burden than other types of caregivers of patients with Alzheimer&#x2019;s disease, with caregiving children reporting significantly more burden than spouses or other relatives. These situations might be different for caregivers of schizophrenia patients.</p>
<p>The influencing mechanism of care-recipient relationship type on caregiver&#x2019;s mental health burden remains to be studied. Previous literature has clearly demonstrated that caregiving is burdensome and psychologically distressing to family members, but the causal mechanism of this distress is not clear (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Schulz et al., 1995</xref>). Caregiver&#x2019;s mental health burden mainly stems from care recipient&#x2019;s personal abilities, caregiver&#x2019;s own abilities, family economic conditions, as well as the availability of public services in the community. As the care recipients&#x2019; health condition progressively declines, family caregivers may encounter difficulties in adapting or modifying their caregiving strategies, leading to a significant high level of caregiving burden (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Papastavrou et al., 2007</xref>). Specifically, an old age, a low socioeconomic status, and a low education level are significantly associated with higher levels of caregiver burden (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Sch&#x00F6;lzel-Dorenbos et al., 2009</xref>). Furthermore, dementia severity, presence of behavioral disturbances, extent of personality change, and presence of schizophrenia symptoms are also significant factors contributing to the increased level of caregiving burden (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Chiao et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>In summary, caregivers of schizophrenia patients bear a significant mental health burden and require more attention. Previous studies have focused more on nursing stress among patients with various physical illnesses and have given insufficient attention to caregivers of patients with mental illness, particularly the influence of relationship type on mental health burden of caregivers of patients with mental illness and its underlying mechanisms. Therefore, using a cross-sectional citywide survey data from Beijing, this research aims to investigate the impact of different care-recipient relationship types on mental health burden of schizophrenia patients in China and its influencing mechanisms.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec6">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Data sources and sample collection</title>
<p>This study used data from a cross-sectional survey conducted among registered patients with schizophrenia in Beijing communities. Face-to-face and telephone interviews were employed during the survey process, utilizing a multi-stage stratified sampling procedure. The survey was jointly conducted by Renmin University and Capital Medical University in China in 2019. A total of 2,994 survey samples were collected from 16 districts of Beijing, with sample sizes ranging from 80 to 500 per district based on population proportions. After excluding records with missing variables, the effective sample size for the analysis was 1,853. The survey was conducted anonymously and did not include any sensitive information. Interviewees participated voluntarily and provided informed consent. Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of Capital Medical University in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Zhu et al., 2021</xref>). The data have several advantages: firstly, it was collected in Beijing, the capital city of China, thus representing one of the most developed areas of the country; secondly, the large sample size and reasonable sampling method enhance the credibility of the conclusions drawn from the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Measurements</title>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.2.1</label>
<title>Dependent variable</title>
<p>Caregiver&#x2019;s mental health burden. The measurement is derived from the Family Burden Interview Schedule (FBIS) proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Pai and Kapur (1981)</xref>, a widely used tool known for its reliability and validity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Karambelas et al., 2022</xref>). The Family Burden Interview Schedule (FBIS) was translated into Chinese, comprising 24 items across six dimensions. These dimensions include financial burden (6 items), disruption of family routine and leisure (9 items), disruption of family interactions (5 items), and the effects on the physical health (2 items) and mental health (2 items) of relatives. Given the focus of this study on caregivers&#x2019; mental health burden, we primarily selected the measurement instrument to assess the emotional impact of schizophrenia patients on caregivers. Specifically, the question asked, &#x201C;whether or not the family members&#x2019; emotion had been impacted (depressive symptoms, crying or angry).&#x201D; Subjects indicated the extent of impact on a 3-point scale ranging from no impact to moderate impact to severe impact. We recoded the variable into a binary variable, with no impact recoded as 0 and moderate or severe impact recoded as 1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.2.2</label>
<title>Independent variable</title>
<p>Caregiver-recipient relationship type. The measurement question is, &#x201C;What is your relationship with the patient?&#x201D; The options include father, mother, father-in-law, mother-in-law, spouse, sibling, son, daughter, grandchild, other relatives, friends, colleague, and others. We recoded the options into four distinct groups: parents, spouse, children, and others. In the empirical analysis, we treated the spousal caregiver group as the reference category.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>2.2.3</label>
<title>Control variables</title>
<p>Firstly, caregiver&#x2019;s personal characteristics, involving their education level and self-rated caregiving ability. Education level was measured as a continuous variable, while self-rated caregiving ability was measured as a dichotomous variable. Secondly, care recipients&#x2019; characteristics include gender, age, disability certification status, treatment status, and duration of schizophrenia for the care recipients. Thirdly, family economic conditions and community factors: regarding family conditions, the survey considered the living arrangements of caregivers and patients, family income level, expenditure on medication and healthcare services, and medical insurance coverage. As for community factors, the survey inquired whether the community provided free healthcare services. Detailed results are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Descriptive results (<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;1853).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Share/Mean(SD)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Min</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Max</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Note</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Caregiver&#x2019;s Mental Health Burden</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Moderate or severe impacted</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">66.9%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(No Impact&#x2009;=&#x2009;0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.88(0.73)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Continuous variable</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Care-recipient relationship type</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Parents</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">31.0%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Spouses</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35.4%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Children</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.3%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Other</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20.3%</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Care givers</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Education Year</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.96(4.32)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Self-Rated Ability (Strong&#x2009;=&#x2009;1)</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85.59%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(weak&#x2009;=&#x2009;0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Care recipients</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Gender (Female&#x2009;=&#x2009;1)</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">53.86%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(Male&#x2009;=&#x2009;0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Age/10</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.93(1.22)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.7</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Disability Certif. (Certificated&#x2009;=&#x2009;1)</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">65.08%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(Not Certif.&#x2009;=&#x2009;0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Under Treatment (Yes&#x2009;=&#x2009;1)</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.42%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(No&#x2009;=&#x2009;0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Time/10</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.93(0.25)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Duration of Schizophrenia</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Time/10 Square</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.36(1.35)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Family and community factors</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Living together (Yes&#x2009;=&#x2009;1)</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84.62%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(No&#x2009;=&#x2009;0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Family income (log)</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.01(1.10)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.19</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">ln (income)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Consumption on Med.(log)</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.28(0.25)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Cons. on Med.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Market Care Service (Yes&#x2009;=&#x2009;1)</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.78%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(Yes&#x2009;=&#x2009;1; No&#x2009;=&#x2009;0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Med. Pay. Expense</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(Public Insurance&#x2009;=&#x2009;1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">78.74%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(Self-Pay&#x2009;=&#x2009;0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Community Care service (Yes&#x2009;=&#x2009;1)</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.62%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(Not Provided&#x2009;=&#x2009;0)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>SD, standard deviation.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The software Stata 17 was utilized for data cleaning and analysis. Firstly, baseline values of different types of caregivers&#x2019; mental health burden were compared using <italic>t</italic>-tests and Pearson chi-square tests. Secondly, logistic regression models and ordered logistic regression models were employed to examine the correlation between caregiver-recipient relationship type and caregivers&#x2019; mental health burden (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Xie, 2010</xref>). Subsample regression analysis was conducted to study different relationship types of caregivers. Lastly, to compare the relative influence of patient factors and family/community factors on caregivers&#x2019; mental health burden, the Sheaf coefficient method was used for post-estimation of logit regression models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Heise, 1972</xref>), utilizing the Stata commands proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Buis (2009)</xref>.</p>
<p>For more information about the Sheaf coefficient method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Liu, 2015</xref>), which begins with the binomial logit model as shown in <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="EQ1">Eq. (1)</xref>:</p>
<disp-formula id="EQ1">
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math id="M1">
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">logit</mml:mi>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo stretchy="true">&#x2211;</mml:mo>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03B2;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo stretchy="true">&#x2211;</mml:mo>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03B2;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo stretchy="true">&#x2211;</mml:mo>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03B2;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x03B5;</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p><inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M2">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> represents a set of independent variables related to patient factors, <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M3">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> represents a vector of independent variables related to family conditions, and <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M4">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> represents a matrix of other control variables in the model. To compare the effects between patient factors and family conditions, the Sheaf coefficients method was introduced to the modeling process. Supposing the presence of a latent variable for patient factors (<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M5">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03B7;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="EQ2">Eq. (2)</xref>) and a latent variable for family conditions (<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M6">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03B7;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="EQ3">Eq. (3)</xref>), which are outcome variables of a series of independent variables <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M7">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> related to patient factors and <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M8">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> related to family conditions:</p>
<disp-formula id="EQ2">
<label>(2)</label>
<mml:math id="M9">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03B7;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo stretchy="true">&#x2211;</mml:mo>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="EQ3">
<label>(3)</label>
<mml:math id="M10">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03B7;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo stretchy="true">&#x2211;</mml:mo>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p><xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="EQ1">Eq. (1)</xref> is rewrote as follows:</p>
<disp-formula id="EQ4">
<label>(4)</label>
<mml:math id="M11">
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">logit</mml:mi>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03BB;</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03B7;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03BB;</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03B7;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo stretchy="true">&#x2211;</mml:mo>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03B2;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x03B5;</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>In fact, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="EQ4">Eq. (4)</xref> is merely an alternative representation of <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="EQ1">Eq. (1)</xref>, and it serves as an estimation performed after fitting model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Vigo et al., 2016</xref>). The objective of post-estimation is to simultaneously select two sets of parameters, <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M12">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M13">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, such that the standard deviation of both <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M14">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03B7;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M15">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03B7;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is set to 1. This ensures that the effects of the two cluster variables, <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M16">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03B7;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M17">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03B7;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, are comparable.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec13">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Sample characteristics</title>
<p>Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref> show that 66.9% of caregivers of schizophrenia patients in Beijing reported being moderately or severely impacted by their caregiving work. When utilizing the same measurement as a continuous variable, the mean score of caregiver&#x2019;s mental health burden in China is 1.88, which is much higher than that (0.79 or 0.99) in India (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Lasebikan and Ayinde, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Swain et al., 2017</xref>). This result is in line with the findings of Chen&#x2019;s survey in Beijing, where approximately 70% of respondents reported experiencing mental stress burden (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Chen et al., 2019</xref>). Additionally, a total of 1,853 (62.9%) out of 2,993 schizophrenia caregivers in Beijing were included in current study, comprising 31% parental caregivers, 35.4% spousal caregivers, 13.3% adult-child caregivers, and 20.3% other caregivers. Furthermore, as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, 74.3% of parental caregivers reported being moderately or severely impacted by their caregiving responsibilities, while 64.5% of spousal caregivers, 58.5% of adult-child caregivers, and 65.3% of other caregivers reported similar experiences. These findings indicate that most caregivers of schizophrenia patients in China endure a heavy mental health burden.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Care-recipient relationship type and caregivers&#x2019; mental health burden.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-15-1402159-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In terms of caregivers, the average education duration was 9.96&#x2009;years, which is higher than the national average year (9.91&#x2009;years) of schooling for people over the age of 15 in China, presented by the seventh Chinese census conducted in 2020 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Akimov et al., 2021</xref>). Additionally, 85.6% of caregivers reported having a strong ability to care for their recipients. As for the care recipients, 53.86% were female, with an average age of 59.3&#x2009;years. Moreover, 65% held disability certification, 93.42% were undergoing hospital treatment, and the mean duration of schizophrenia illness was 9.3&#x2009;years. Regarding family and community conditions, the results reveal that 85% of caregivers were cohabiting with their care recipients. The average unweighted family income was 17,306 yuan, while the average percentage of household expenditure on medical expenses was 28%. Only 3.78% of families could afford market care services. Furthermore, public medical insurance was accessible to 78.74% of families, but at the community level, only 3.62% of families had received community care services.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Correlation between the caregiver-recipient relationship type and caregiver&#x2019;s mental health</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref> displays the logistic regression model results regarding the impact of the relationship type between schizophrenia patients and caregivers on the caregiver&#x2019;s mental health burden. Model 1 serves as the baseline model, indicating that compared to the spouse caregiver group, parent caregivers have significantly experienced more burden while caring for their family member with schizophrenia. Conversely, children acting as caregivers have experienced significantly less burden than the reference group, while other relation types show no significant differences from the spouse relationship type.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Logistic regression models on the impact of care-recipient relationship type on mental health burden of schizophrenia patients&#x2019; caregivers in Beijing.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">(1)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">(2)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">(3)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">(4)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">(5)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">(6)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Variables</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Relation</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">+Care giver</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">+Patients</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">+Family</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">+Community</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Full model</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Relation (ref. Spouse)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Parents</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.47<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.46<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.43<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.48<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.45<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.43<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Children</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.25<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.30<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.08</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.25</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Other</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.03</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Care giver</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Education</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.01</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.03<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Self-rated ability</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.35<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.29<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Patients</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Gender (ref. female)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.31<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.30<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Age/10</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.10<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.08<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Disability Certif.</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.04</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Under treatment</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.46<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.51<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Time/10</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.31<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.30<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Time/102</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.07<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.07<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Family and community</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Living (ref. Live together)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.06</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Family income (log)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.04</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Consumption on Med.(log)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.99&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.93<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Consumption on care service</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.88&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.85<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Med. Pay. Expense</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.33<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.34<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Community care service</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.35</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Constant</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.60<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.77<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.76<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.71</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.86<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;0.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Observations</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1,853</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1,853</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1,853</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1,853</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1,853</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1,853</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Pseudo R-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.04</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup><italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01, <sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup><italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05, <sup>&#x002A;</sup><italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.1.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In Model 2, with the inclusion of caregivers&#x2019; personal characteristics as controls, the results remain largely unchanged from Model 1. Transitioning to Model 3, where we additionally consider the personal characteristics of mental illness patients, the findings indicate that, compared to the reference group, parent caregivers continue to experience significantly higher burden from caregiving activities, while child caregivers and other relation types do not differ significantly from the reference group.</p>
<p>Models 4 and 5 further incorporate family economic factors and community factors, with Model 6 representing the full model. The influence of caregivers&#x2019; relationship types with schizophrenia patients on the caregiver&#x2019;s mental health burden remains relatively consistent across these models. Regarding control variables, the findings suggest that medical insurance coverage significantly reduces caregiver&#x2019;s mental health burden, while community care services do not have a statistically significant impact. Overall, the results demonstrate that, compared to spouse caregivers, parent caregivers experience greater mental health burden from caregiving activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>The influence mechanism of care-recipient relationship type on the caregiver&#x2019;s mental health burden of schizophrenia patients</title>
<p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>, we have segmented the samples into four distinct groups based on the caregiver&#x2019;s relationship types with the mental health patients, aiming to investigate the influence of various factors on the mental health burden of caregivers for schizophrenia patients. Model 1 reveals that, for parent caregivers, personal education significantly impacts their mental health burden. Additionally, male patients and whether they are undergoing treatment significantly contribute to their caregivers&#x2019; mental health burden. However, family and community factors do not show significant impacts on caregivers&#x2019; mental health burden.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Logistic regression results across different relation types.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">(1)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">(2)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">(3)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">(4)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Variables</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Parents</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Spouses</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Children</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Others</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Care Giver</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Education</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.05<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Self-rated ability</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.17</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.52<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.39</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Patients</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Gender (ref. female)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.53<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.30<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.16</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Age/10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.19<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.17<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Disability Certif.</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.31<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.51<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Under treatment</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.74<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.94<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Time/10</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.24</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.11</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.25</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.43<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Time/102</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Family and community</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Living (ref. Live together)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.46</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.09</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.08</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Family Income (log)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.08</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.11</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Consumption on Med.(log)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.66</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.12<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.31<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.69</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Consumption on care service</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.03<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.71</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Med. Pay. Expense</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.24</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.44<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.47</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Community care SERVICE</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.31</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.31</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Constant</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.18<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;1.67</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Observations</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">573</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">657</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">246</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">377</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Pseudo R-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.048</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.056</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.057</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.046</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup><italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01, <sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup><italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05, <sup>&#x002A;</sup><italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.1.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Results in model 2 demonstrate that spouse caregivers&#x2019; self-rated ability significantly reduces their mental health burden. Furthermore, patients&#x2019; gender, age, disability certification, and treatment status also impact the mental health burden of spouse caregivers. Family and community factors, particularly expenditure on medical care and care services, significantly increase the mental health burden of spouse caregivers. Conversely, medical payment expenses significantly decrease their mental health burden. Models 3 and 4 present the findings for children and other relation types. Caregivers&#x2019; personal characteristics do not significantly impact their mental health burden in these groups. However, some patient characteristics and family/community conditions have a significant impact on the mental health burden of child caregivers. For other relation types, only schizophrenia patients&#x2019; personal characteristics significantly affect their mental health burden, particularly factors related to timing such as patient age and duration of illness.</p>
<p>Lastly, to compare the differences in various influencing factors on the mental health burden of caregivers across different relationship types, we employed the Sheaf coefficient method. The method allows us to compare the impact of patients&#x2019; ability factors and family economic factors on caregivers&#x2019; mental health burden. Results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref> indicate that, for the full sample, the odds ratio is 4.53 (=e<sup>1.51</sup>), indicating that caregivers&#x2019; mental health burden primarily stems from family economic factors compared to patients&#x2019; ability factors.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison results based on the sheaf coefficient method.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th rowspan="2"/>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Full sample</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="4">Different relations</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Parents</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Spouses</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Children</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Others</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">I. Patients&#x2019; ability factors</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">II. Family or economic factors</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.22</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.28</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Relative ratio (II/I)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.51</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.77</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.43</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.45</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Sample</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1853</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">573</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">657</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">246</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">377</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>For parent caregivers, patients&#x2019; ability factors primarily contribute to their mental health burden. This suggests that most parent caregivers may lack the physical capabilities needed to provide optimal care for their adult child with schizophrenia. In contrast, for spouses and other relationship types, family economic factors emerge as the primary influencing factors. Spousal caregivers, who constitute the main caregiving group for schizophrenia patients in present Chinese society, bear a heavier mental and economic burden compared to other caregiving groups. Regarding children as caregivers, although family economic factors have a slightly higher relative impact compared to patients&#x2019; ability factors with an odds ratio of 4.24, their mental health burden is relatively small, as indicated by previous analysis results. Similarly, for caregivers in other relationship types, their mental health burden is primarily attributed to family economic factors.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec17">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Findings of this study underscore the association between care-recipient relationship type and mental health burden experienced by caregivers of schizophrenia patients, with the influencing mechanism varying depending on the nature of the relationship. Our research, conducted among caregivers of schizophrenia patients in Beijing, China, highlights a notably high level of mental health burden, with 66.9% reporting moderate or severe impacts from their caregiving responsibilities. Schizophrenia, characterized by a disconnection between thoughts, emotions, and behaviors, often leads to withdrawal from reality and personal relationships. Caregivers of individuals with schizophrenia face significant challenges beyond ordinary imagination, navigating between cultural beliefs and modern treatment options to find a balance that aligns with their family&#x2019;s preferences and values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Behrendt et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Peng et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Findings reveal that parents and spouses serving as primary caregivers for schizophrenia patients in Beijing encounter a considerable burden of mental stress, with 74.3 and 64.5%, respectively, reporting moderate or severe impact from caregiving activities. Traditional Chinese values, emphasizing family cohesion and filial piety, likely influence caregiving dynamics for individuals with schizophrenia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Yan, 2023</xref>). Consequently, parents and spouses often bear the brunt of caregiving responsibilities, leading to heightened pressure and stress. While the distinction in burden levels between children and spousal caregivers lacked statistical significance, children generally reported lower burden levels than spousal caregivers. Similarly, caregivers in other relationship categories also indicated lower burden levels compared to spousal caregivers.</p>
<p>The present results indicate that the relationship type between caregivers and schizophrenia patients may have varying impacts on caregivers&#x2019; mental health burden, and the sources of this burden differ as well. These findings underscore the importance of studying the effects of care-recipient relationship type on caregivers&#x2019; mental health burden, particularly in the context of China&#x2019;s market transition period. The lack of public care services has forced individuals to rely on assistance from within their families, resulting in family informal caregivers bearing a disproportionate amount of pressure that ideally should be shared by society.</p>
<p>The factors influencing caregivers&#x2019; mental health burden varied depending on the relationship type with schizophrenia patients. For many families of Chinese schizophrenia patients, the primary source of mental health burden for caregivers is not the patients themselves, but rather the responsibility of meeting caregiving duties while also sustaining the family&#x2019;s livelihood. Parent caregivers typically experience mental health burden stemming from the personal factors of schizophrenia patients, whereas spousal caregivers or children as caregivers face socioeconomic factors, particularly economic burdens. Healthcare costs can pose significant challenges for Chinese families, especially when managing chronic conditions like schizophrenia. Out-of-pocket expenses for medications, therapy, and hospitalizations may strain household finances, particularly for low-income families or those lacking adequate insurance coverage.</p>
<p>Our results also indicate that only a small proportion of families can afford market-based care services, and most communities lack specific services for individuals with schizophrenia. In Beijing, various policies and measures have been implemented to support minority individuals, including schizophrenia patients, such as social, economic, medical, educational, and environmental support (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Chen et al., 2019</xref>). Formal support programs could help reduce caregiver burden by improving caregivers&#x2019; stress management, coping skills, and access to informal sources of social support (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Kamil and Velligan, 2019</xref>). However, there remains an insufficient provision of public services, particularly mental health support, for caregivers of mental health patients. Despite China&#x2019;s progress in expanding mental health services, there is still a shortage of community-based support programs and resources tailored to caregivers of individuals with schizophrenia. This lack of support infrastructure can leave caregivers feeling overwhelmed and under supported.</p>
<p>The implication of this research primarily focuses on mitigating caregiver burden. Mental stress affects not only caregivers of schizophrenic patients but also those caring for individuals with other serious illnesses or elderly family members, highlighting the need for public sector attention to provide them with essential social and economic support. It is crucial to emphasize the value of reciprocity between caregivers and their mentally ill family members (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Horwitz et al., 1996</xref>). The reciprocity norm may limit support for schizophrenia patients who cannot reciprocate. Despite this, family members still provide support, as family reciprocity does not need equal, direct, or immediate exchanges like economic transactions do. Instead, it is seen as a lifelong process where current support can reciprocate past support or anticipate future support. Additionally, the long-term care insurance, which is being piloted across the country (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Feng et al., 2020</xref>), should provide more financial support for patients with schizophrenia and their caregivers. By sharing the economic burden of schizophrenia, the quality of life for schizophrenia patients will be enhanced and the economic and mental health burden on their caregivers will be alleviated. Moreover, humanistic care for caregivers of patients with schizophrenia should be enhanced, as long-term caregiving activities can often lead to mental burnout in these individuals, thereby negatively impacting the overall well-being of schizophrenia patients. As an old Chinese saying goes, &#x201C;A parent of prolonged illness finds no dutiful children at the beside,&#x201D; underscoring the importance of alleviating caregivers&#x2019; mental and economic burdens through effective system design (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Sun et al., 2021</xref>). This is essential for elderly schizophrenia patients to enjoy their later years with dignity.</p>
<p>To our knowledge, this is the first study to utilize large-scale survey data to explore the correlation and influencing mechanisms between the care-recipient relationship type and the caregiver&#x2019;s mental health burden of schizophrenia patients in China. However, this study also has several limitations. Firstly, due to its cross-sectional design and convenience sampling method, the results may not be generalizable to a broader population. Secondly, not all schizophrenia patients require or receive care from others; only those with severe symptoms or better economic circumstances do, potentially introducing selection bias into the sample data. Thirdly, the measurement of the binary format dependent variable may limit the rigor to capture varying levels of stress. Lastly, while other protective factors such as psychotherapy or counseling interventions could potentially reduce the mental health burden of caregivers of psychiatric patients, the lack of relevant measurements in the questionnaire makes it difficult to investigate these factors in this paper. Addressing these limitations will be imperative for future research endeavors.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec18">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study indicates that care-recipient relationship type significantly influences mental health burden of caregivers among schizophrenia patients in Beijing, China. Both patient factors and family economic conditions affect caregivers&#x2019; mental health burden, with parental caregivers primarily affected by patients&#x2019; illness conditions, while spousal caregivers&#x2019; burden mainly stems from family economic conditions. Moreover, compared to spousal caregivers, the mental health burden of caregivers in the children, sibling, or other relationship categories experienced a comparatively lower mental health burden. Caregivers&#x2019; mental health, particularly for those caring for schizophrenia patients, is an important public concern. In China, the diverse types of care-recipient relationship lead to varying degrees of mental health burden among caregivers of schizophrenia patients. As a society deeply influenced by Confucian culture, people should uphold the culture of reciprocal relationships based on family affection. Besides, attention should be given to constructing public social services and providing humanistic care for caregivers of schizophrenia patients. This will enhance the quality of life for schizophrenia patients and alleviate the mental burden on caregivers.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec19">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec20">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving humans were approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Capital Medical University in China. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec21">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YZ: Writing &#x2013; original draft. MY: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec22">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors thank all research assistants for their works. Especially thanks to Professor Quan Lu in the Renmin University of China and Professor Shao-Guo Zhai in the Northwest University in China for their kind help in the project.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec23">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec24">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Akimov</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gemueva</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Semenova</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The seventh population census in the PRC: results and prospects of the country&#x2019;s demographic development</article-title>. <source>Her. Russ. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>724</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>735</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1134/S1019331621060083</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35125844</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ascher</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sturm</surname> <given-names>V. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seider</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holley</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levenson</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Relationship satisfaction and emotional language in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease patients and spousal caregivers</article-title>. <source>Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/wad.0b013e3181bd66a3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20220322</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Avioli</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>The social support functions of siblings in later life: a theoretical model</article-title>. <source>Am. Behav. Sci.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0002764289033001005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Awad</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Voruganti</surname> <given-names>L. N. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The burden of schizophrenia on caregivers</article-title>. <source>Pharmaco Econ.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>162</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2165/00019053-200826020-00005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Behrendt</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>Q. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rani</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Social protection systems and the future of work: ensuring social security for digital platform workers</article-title>. <source>Int. Soc. Secur. Rev.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/issr.12212</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="confproc"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buis</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group>, <article-title>Three models for combining information from causal indicators</article-title> <conf-name>United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings</conf-name>; (<year>2009</year>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caqueo-Ur&#x00ED;zar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guti&#x00E9;rrez-Maldonado</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miranda-Castillo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Quality of life in caregivers of patients with schizophrenia: a literature review</article-title>. <source>Health Qual. Life Outcomes</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1477-7525-7-84</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19747384</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Global perspective of burden of family caregivers for persons with schizophrenia</article-title>. <source>Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>339</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>349</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apnu.2011.03.008</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21978802</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The impact of self-perceived burden, caregiver burden, and dyadic coping on negative emotions in colorectal cancer patient-spousal caregiver dyads: a dyadic analysis</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>1238924</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1238924</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37818420</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The burden, support and needs of primary family caregivers of people experiencing schizophrenia in Beijing communities: a qualitative study</article-title>. <source>BMC Psychiatry</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12888-019-2052-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30786852</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chiao</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hsiao</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Caregiver burden for informal caregivers of patients with dementia: a systematic review</article-title>. <source>Int. Nurs. Rev.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>340</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>350</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/inr.12194</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chua</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abd Rahman</surname> <given-names>F. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ratnasingam</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Problem behaviours and caregiver burden among children with autism Spectrum disorder in Kuching, Sarawak</article-title>. <source>Front. Psych.</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>1244164</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1244164</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37965356</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gold</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shulman</surname> <given-names>K. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wortley</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wargon</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Factors determining the decision to institutionalize dementing individuals: a prospective study</article-title>. <source>Gerontologist</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>714</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>720</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/geront/33.6.714</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8314097</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cook</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Who" mothers" the chronically mentally ill?</article-title> <source>Fam. Relat.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>42</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/584428</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dillehay</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sandys</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Caregivers for Alzheimer's patients: what we are learning from research</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>263</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>285</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2190/2P3J-A9AH-HHF4-00RG</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Does long-term care insurance reduce hospital utilization and medical expenditures? Evidence from China</article-title>. <source>Soc. Sci. Med.</source> <volume>258</volume>:<fpage>113081</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113081</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32540515</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferraris</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Woodford</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hagedoorn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Dyadic interdependence in non-spousal caregiving dyads&#x2019; wellbeing: a systematic review</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>882389</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882389</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35572327</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heise</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1972</year>). <article-title>Employing nominal variables, induced variables, and block variables in path analyses</article-title>. <source>Sociol. Methods Res.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>173</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/004912417200100201</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hoenig</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamilton</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1966</year>). <article-title>The schizophrenic patient in the community and his effect on the household</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>165</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>176</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/002076406601200301</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5964677</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>G.-R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Family caregiver burden by relationship to care recipient with dementia in Korea</article-title>. <source>Geriatr. Nurs.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>274</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gerinurse.2007.09.004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18694702</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Horwitz</surname> <given-names>A. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reinhard</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Howell-White</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Caregiving as reciprocal exchange in families with seriously mentally ill members</article-title>. <source>J. Health Soc. Behav.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>162</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2137270</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8690876</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hsiao</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Factors of caregiver burden and family functioning among Taiwanese family caregivers living with schizophrenia</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Nurs.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>1546</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1556</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jocn.12745</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25488264</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Juntapim</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nuntaboot</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Care of patients with schizophrenia in the community</article-title>. <source>Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>855</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>860</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apnu.2018.06.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kamil</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Velligan</surname> <given-names>D. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Caregivers of individuals with schizophrenia: who are they and what are their challenges?</article-title> <source>Curr. Opin. Psychiatry</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>157</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>163</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/YCO.0000000000000492</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Karambelas</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Filia</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Byrne</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allott</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jayasinghe</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cotton</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A systematic review comparing caregiver burden and psychological functioning in caregivers of individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and bipolar disorders</article-title>. <source>BMC Psychiatry</source> <volume>22</volume>:<fpage>422</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12888-022-04069-w</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35733174</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Knock</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kline</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schiffman</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maynard</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reeves</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Burdens and difficulties experienced by caregivers of children and adolescents with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: a qualitative study</article-title>. <source>Early Interv. Psychiatry</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>349</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>354</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1751-7893.2011.00305.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22032549</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Griffith</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuspinar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith-Turchyn</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The impact of care&#x2013;recipient relationship type on health-related quality of life in community-dwelling older adults with dementia and their informal caregivers</article-title>. <source>Qual. Life Res.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>3377</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3390</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11136-022-03203-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35969331</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lasebikan</surname> <given-names>V. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayinde</surname> <given-names>O. O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Family burden in caregivers of schizophrenia patients: prevalence and socio-demographic correlates</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Psychol. Med.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>60</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>66</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/0253-7176.112205</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23833344</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Determining the primary caregiver for disabled older adults in mainland China: spouse priority and living arrangements</article-title>. <source>J. Fam. Ther.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>126</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>141</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1467-6427.12213</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lea</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The relationship between quality of life of caregivers of Alzheimer's disease patients and social support</article-title>. <source>China J. Health Psychol.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>383</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>386</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2017.03.018</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Ability and background: analysis of mechanism affecting access to higher education</article-title>. <source>Soc. Sci. China</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02529203.2015.1029665</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Monin</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schulz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Interpersonal effects of suffering in older adult caregiving relationships</article-title>. <source>Psychol. Aging</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>681</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>695</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/a0016355</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Onitsuka</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hirano</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakazawa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ichihashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miura</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Inada</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Toward recovery in schizophrenia: current concepts, findings, and future research directions</article-title>. <source>Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci.</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>282</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>291</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pcn.13342</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35235256</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pai</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kapur</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>The burden on the family of a psychiatric patient: development of an interview schedule</article-title>. <source>Br. J. Psychiatry</source> <volume>138</volume>, <fpage>332</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>335</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1192/bjp.138.4.332</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7272637</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Papastavrou</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalokerinou</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Papacostas</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsangari</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sourtzi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Caring for a relative with dementia: family caregiver burden</article-title>. <source>J. Adv. Nurs.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>446</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>457</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04250.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>M.-M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Y.-Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Disease-related stressors of caregiving burden among different types of family caregivers of persons with schizophrenia in rural China</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>603</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>614</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0020764019866224</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31387428</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Family Questionnaire among the caregivers of people with schizophrenia</article-title>. <source>Front. Public Health</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>1200130</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpubh.2023.1200130</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chintoh</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Remington</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Foussias</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rotenberg</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Depression in caregivers of patients with schizophrenia: a scoping review</article-title>. <source>Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00127-023-02504-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37308691</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reinhard</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Horwitz</surname> <given-names>A. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Caregiver burden: differentiating the content and consequences of family caregiving</article-title>. <source>J. Marriage Fam.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>741</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>750</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/353928</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rinaldi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spazzafumo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mastriforti</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mattioli</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marvardi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Polidori</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Predictors of high level of burden and distress in caregivers of demented patients: results of an Italian multicenter study</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>168</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/gps.1267</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15660409</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sch&#x00F6;lzel-Dorenbos</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Draskovic</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vernooij-Dassen</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rikkert</surname> <given-names>M. G. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Disorders</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Quality of life and burden of spouses of Alzheimer disease patients</article-title>. <source>Alzheimer Dis.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>171</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>177</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/WAD.0b013e318190a260</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19484919</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schulz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beach</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Czaja</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martire</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Monin</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Family caregiving for older adults</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Psychol.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>635</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>659</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050754</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schulz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O'Brien</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bookwala</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fleissner</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of dementia caregiving: prevalence, correlates, and causes</article-title>. <source>Gerontologist</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>771</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>791</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/geront/35.6.771</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8557205</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simonelli</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tripodi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rossi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fabrizi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lembo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cosmi</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The influence of caregiver burden on sexual intimacy and marital satisfaction in couples with an Alzheimer spouse</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Clin. Pract.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01506.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Perception of burden by caregivers of patients with schizophrenia</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Psychiatry</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>148</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>152</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/0019-5545.55938</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20814457</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A parent of prolonged illness finds no dutiful children at the beside an empirical study on the adult Children's care performance of Chinese disabled elderly: the moderating effects of home-based Care Services for the Elderly</article-title>. <source>Popul. Dev.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>114</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>123</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Swain</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Behura</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dash</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>A comparative study of family burden and quality of life between caregivers of schizophrenia and dementia patients</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Commun. Med. Public Health</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>2021</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2026</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20172169</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vigo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thornicroft</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Atun</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Estimating the true global burden of mental illness</article-title>. <source>Lancet Psychiatry</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>171</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>178</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00505-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26851330</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <source>Regression analysis (in Chinese)</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Social Science Literature Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Familial affections Vis-&#x00E0;-Vis filial piety: the ethical challenges facing eldercare under neo-familism in contemporary China</article-title>. <source>J. Chin. Sociol.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>5</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40711-023-00185-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yeager</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hyer</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hobbs</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coyne</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia: the complex relationship between diagnosis and caregiver burden</article-title>. <source>Issues Ment. Health Nurs.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>376</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>384</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/01612840903434589</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20450339</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Attitudes and willingness to accept long-acting injections for patients with schizophrenia in Beijing: a cross-sectional investigation based on samples from the communities</article-title>. <source>Front. Public Health</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>770276</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpubh.2021.770276</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34900914</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>