<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Psychol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Psychology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Psychol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-1078</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1391254</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Psychology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Examining Women&#x2019;s support for birth encouragement policies in China: an extension of the influence of presumed media influence model</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Shiyao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2658395/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>Department of Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore</institution>, <addr-line>Singapore</addr-line>, <country>Singapore</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: Saar Mollen, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: Mengxue Ou, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore</p>
<p>Elliot Panek, University of Alabama, United States</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Shiyao Li, <email>lishiyao000@gmail.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>06</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1391254</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>11</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>25</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2024 Li.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Li</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>This study employs the influence of the presumed media influence (IPMI) model to explore how media messages and interpersonal communication indirectly affect Chinese women&#x2019;s support for birth encouragement policies. Surveying 616 Chinese women of reproductive age, this study finds that exposure to media messages regarding childbirth benefits and interpersonal communication are positively correlated with the presumed influence of such media messages on others. Presumed media influence on others is further positively associated with perceived personal norms and social norms regarding support for birth encouragement policies. Perceived social and personal norms, in turn, are positively associated with Chinese women&#x2019;s support for birth encouragement policies. The theoretical and practical implications of this study are examined.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>influence of presumed influence</kwd>
<kwd>support for birth encouragement policies</kwd>
<kwd>interpersonal communication</kwd>
<kwd>media attention</kwd>
<kwd>social norms</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="91"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="10786"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Media Psychology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Population growth is crucial for the sustainable development of a country. However, numerous countries are grappling with significant demographic challenges due to aging populations and declining birth rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Min et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Mu, 2019</xref>). In 2023, China&#x2019;s birth rate dropped by 5.7%, reaching a new low (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Master, 2024</xref>). The low birth rate has negatively impacted Chinese society, leading to a shrinking labor force and adversely affecting economic growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Mu, 2019</xref>). To mitigate the negative impacts of low birth rates, the Chinese government has implemented various birth encouragement policies, such as the two-child policy in 2015 and the three-child policy in 2021. Despite these policy encouragements, the birth rate in China has continued to decline, and Chinese people&#x2019;s plans to have children remain low, without showing support for these policies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref84">Zhai and Jin, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref90">Zhuang et al., 2020</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Billingsley and Ferrarini (2014)</xref> indicated that support for the birth policies is positively related to intentions to have children, which will, in turn, affect behavior. Given the importance of support for Chinese birth policies in influencing women&#x2019;s intentions to have children and subsequent behaviors, understanding how Chinese people react toward the birth encouragement policies (e.g., people&#x2019;s support for such policies) is of great importance.</p>
<p>The development of the Internet and social media platforms in China has greatly altered the ways people access and process information. Indeed, social media platforms in China have become key arenas for public discourse, shaping opinions on birth policies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Li and Li, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Ning et al., 2022</xref>). Past studies have examined the link between media consumption and individuals&#x2019; intentions regarding childbirth. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Huang and Qiu (2022)</xref> found that positive parenting messages on social media can enhance individuals&#x2019; plans to have children. Another study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Hornik and McAnany (2001)</xref> indicated that media might produce a long-term influence on the intention of having children through media and initiating interpersonal communication among individuals. However, few studies (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Barber and Axinn, 2004</xref>) have examined the role of media exposure in shaping people&#x2019;s attitudes toward having children or its related policies. Given the potential role that media play in shaping public opinions toward childbirth and its related policies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Ma, 2023</xref>) and the lack of relevant studies in the context of China, this study aims to understand how media influences Chinese women&#x2019;s attitudinal reactions (i.e., support) toward birth encouragement policies in China.</p>
<p>Previous studies primarily focused on the direct media influence on individuals&#x2019; support for having children, with most of them emphasizing the negative impact of messages highlighting the risks of having children (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Marshall et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Wan and Zhou, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref80">Yang and Wang, 2023</xref>). The majority of these literatures regarded social media platforms as significant channels for disseminating risks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Li et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Liu and Song, 2022</xref>), contributing to the public&#x2019;s adverse perception of having children (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Li et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Mu, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref79">Xu and Hu, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref85">Zhai and Li, 2023</xref>). However, on Chinese social media platforms, there is also a substantial amount of content related to the benefits of having children. These messages originate from both the social media accounts of mainstream media and user-generated content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Qian et al., 2020</xref>). These contents not only provide the latest updates regarding birth encouragement policies but also disseminate benefit messages related to childbirth, such as the social value, inheritance value, self-development value, and emotional value of having children (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Jing et al., 2022</xref>). While some studies have indicated the direct influence of media messages about risks on people&#x2019;s attitudinal responses toward having children (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Adair et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Barber and Axinn, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Hornik and McAnany, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Knobloch-Westerwick et al., 2016</xref>), scant research has explored how media messages on the benefits of having children indirectly affect people&#x2019;s opinions toward related policies through their presumed influence of on others.</p>
<p>Simultaneously, the topics of having children is frequently discussed within interpersonal communication scenarios in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Li et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Ning et al., 2022</xref>). Previous studies have revealed the significant impact of interpersonal communication on shaping attitudinal responses toward childbearing, indicating that personal social networks play a pivotal role in individuals&#x2019; decisions about having children (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">B&#x00FC;hler and Fratczak, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Martins et al., 2013</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Boulay and Valente (1999)</xref> demonstrated that women usually initiate informal discussions about having children within their social networks, where they gain information and external pressure from the norms of the group. However, there has been limited research on how interpersonal communication might influence people&#x2019;s attitudinal responses toward having children and relevant birth encouragement policies through presumed media influence.</p>
<p>Extant literature has highlighted how social norms in the IPMI influence attitudinal or behavioral responses (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Ho et al., 2022a</xref>). However, few studies have explored how personal norms (i.e., a sense of self-obligation) could complement social norms in shaping the public&#x2019;s support for birth encouragement policies, especially in China, where cultural values (e.g., filial piety and family continuation) significantly shape the attitudinal responses toward childbirth and governmental birth encouragement policies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bedford and Yeh, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Dong and Xu, 2016</xref>). This internalized sense of obligation constitutes personal norms, leading individuals to perceive childbearing not merely as a duty, but as an essential component of their personal value system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Fu et al., 2020</xref>), which subsequently shapes women&#x2019;s attitudinal and behavioral responses. For example, in the context of birth encouragement policies, support for these policies can be seen as an attitudinal outcome of this internalization of personal responsibilities for childbirth. Therefore, this study seeks to examine the influence of both social and personal norms on support for birth encouragement policies, analyzing how these norms shape individual perspectives.</p>
<p>This study extends the IPMI model by integrating interpersonal communication and personal norms into one theoretical framework, offering new insights into how media messages, interpersonal communication, and normative factors shape the attitudinal response of productive-age women toward birth encouragement policies in China. These findings provide valuable guidance for communication practitioners and policymakers, suggesting that emphasizing interpersonal communication and personal norms could significantly enhance public support for national demographic strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2">
<title>Literature review</title>
<p>The influence of presumed media influence (IPMI) model extends from the third-person effect, a theory posited by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Davison (1983)</xref>, which suggests that individuals believe others are more susceptible to media influence than they are themselves. At the same time, individuals may adjust their own attitudinal or behavioral responses based on these assumptions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Gunther and Storey, 2003</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Gunther (1998)</xref> extended the third-person effect by introducing the concept of persuasive inference, explaining how individuals form assumptions about the effects of mass media content on others after encountering it. In the digital media era, people can easily access various media content and form their own impressions. However, despite the abundance of available media content, various algorithm-based media platforms (e.g., AI-driven social media like TikTok) often expose individuals to a limited subset of information that aligns with their interests or preferences, resulting in a narrow window of exposure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Ou et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref91">Zuiderveen Borgesius et al., 2016</xref>). As a result, individuals tend to be exposed to biased information. This fragmented media exposure leads individuals to form assumptions based on the small sample of content they have encountered, rather than considering the full spectrum of available information (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Broniarczyk and Alba, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Gunther, 1998</xref>). According to the law-of-small-numbers bias, people tend to make strong inferences based on limited data, assuming that others are exposed to the same content as themselves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Tversky and Kahneman, 1971</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Davison (1983)</xref>, individuals tend to perceive others as vulnerable audiences who lack resistance to mass media content, making them more susceptible to its influence. These assumptions can ultimately lead to changes in people&#x2019;s attitudinal responses, driven primarily by their perception of how others are influenced by the media (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Gunther and Storey, 2003</xref>).</p>
<p>Specifically, the IPMI suggests that individuals&#x2019; attention to media messages leads them to assume that others will also pay attention to the same content and be influenced by it. As a result, they typically adjust their own attitudinal and behavioral response based on these assumptions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Gunther and Storey, 2003</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Tal-or and Tsfati (2020)</xref> further explained the causal relationship between presumed influence on others and the behavioral component. According to them, there are three main types of presumed influence on others: prevention, coordination, and normative influences. Prevention refers to people&#x2019;s intention to prevent the further dissemination of harmful messages. As an example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref77">Wu (2023)</xref> found that individuals perceiving the harmful influence of health misinformation on others are likely to fact-check the content before sharing it to limit further dissemination. Coordination highlights that based on the presumed influence of an already disseminated message on others, people will adjust their behaviors to align with their assumptions of how the message will influence others (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Shi et al., 2022</xref>). For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Tal-or et al. (2010)</xref> found that when individuals are exposed to the positive message of pornography and presume that the same message will influence others, they will weaken their support for the censorship of pornography. Normative influence emphasizes that individuals may actively accept or defy established social norms in response to the presumed effect of the message on others (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Shi et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Tal-Or and Tsfati, 2020</xref>). Previous studies, such as that by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Ho et al. (2014)</xref>, found that perceived prevalence (i.e., descriptive norms) and the perception of other&#x2019;s expectations (i.e., injunctive norms) regarding drinking influence adolescents&#x2019; intention to consume alcohol. The correlation between presumed media influence and behavioral intention has also been demonstrated in previous studies, such as the research on sexual behavioral intentions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Chia, 2006</xref>) and that on intentions to consume cultivated meat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Ho et al., 2024</xref>). Besides behavioral intentions, the IPMI model has also been found to influence people&#x2019;s support for certain policies. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Ho et al. (2022b)</xref> revealed the positive correlation between scientists&#x2019; perceived impact of fake science news on others and their support for media literacy education and legislation against fake news. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Baek et al. (2019)</xref> also found the correlation between fake news exposure and support for government intervention and sanctions against fake news creators and sharers.</p>
<p>The IPMI model proposes two stages in which media indirectly affect attitudinal and behavioral responses. In the first stage, based on the persuasive inference hypothesis, individuals assume that the media messages they are exposed to will also be disseminated to others, leading them to believe that others will attend to and be influenced by these messages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Gunther, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Gunther and Storey, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Ho et al., 2016</xref>). Various studies have already demonstrated a positive correlation between self-media attention and presumed media influence on others. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Ho et al. (2022a)</xref> identified a positive correlation between individuals&#x2019; attention to benefit messages regarding plant-based meat and their perception of others&#x2019; attention to the same messages. Other studies have also revealed that an individual&#x2019;s increased exposure to specific media messages is likely to induce their assumptions that others are similarly attentive to those messages. Such media messages include idealized thin images (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Park, 2005</xref>), fake science news (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Ho et al., 2022b</xref>), sex-related messages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Chia, 2006</xref>) and smoking-related messages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Gunther et al., 2006</xref>). Hence, I propose:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H1</italic>: Self-attention to the benefits of having children on social media will be positively related to their presumed influence of such messages on others.</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>Besides self-media attention, this study also hypothesizes that interpersonal communication will affect individuals&#x2019; presumed media influence on others. In today&#x2019;s mediatized society, mass communication and interpersonal communication cannot be simply defined in a dichotomous manner (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Shi et al., 2022</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Southwell and Yzer (2007)</xref> revealed in their study that interpersonal communication can play multiple roles in the mass communication process, including being an outcome, mediator, or moderator. People do not receive information in isolation but engage in discussions about specific social content while being exposed to social media (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Shi et al., 2022</xref>). Furthermore, interpersonal communication is seen as another source of information, through which people actively seek and receive information. In other words, when discussing certain media content, people may believe that such content is likely to influence others, particularly if they assume that these messages are being discussed within their social circles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Chia, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Shi et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Previous studies have focused on the relationships among self-media exposure, interpersonal communication, and presumed media influence. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Chia (2010)</xref> examined the mediating role of interpersonal communication between one&#x2019;s own attention to media content and presumed media influence on others. The study found that adolescents&#x2019; attention to advertisements was directly and positively related to the frequency with which they discussed these ads with their parents and friends, and this frequency of communication was further positively associated with presumed materialism in others (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Chia, 2010</xref>). Building on this, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Shi et al. (2022)</xref> introduced interpersonal communication as a potential variable in the IPMI model and indicated that interpersonal communication has a positive correlation with the presumed influence of COVID-19 misinformation on others.</p>
<p>On various social media platforms in China, there is an abundance of content promoting the benefits of having children, including posts from government accounts and user-generated content. The Chinese government actively utilizes platforms such as WeChat, Weibo, and Douyin (the Chinese version of TikTok) to raise awareness about the advantages of having children and related supportive policies. Key strategies include promoting the three-child policy, emphasizing socio-economic benefits, supporting children&#x2019;s education, and improving healthcare services for mothers and children (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Jing et al., 2022</xref>). In addition to government efforts, celebrities and social media influencers also contribute by promoting positive family values and the joys of parenthood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Qian et al., 2020</xref>). They share personal stories and create content that portrays childbearing as emotionally fulfilling and essential for preserving Chinese traditions (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Qian et al., 2020</xref>). These messages effectively reach younger audiences, who are highly engaged on platforms like Douyin and Weibo. The content promoting the benefits of having children potentially sparks offline discussions, leading people to assume that others are engaging with these topics as well and may be influenced by them. Therefore, I propose:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>H2</italic>: Individuals&#x2019; interpersonal communication about the benefits of having children will be positively related to their presumed influence of messages about the benefits of having children on others.</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>Social norms include explicit or implicit regulations that guide, regulate, and prescribe social behavior in specific social settings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Burchell et al., 2013</xref>). As unwritten rules, they guide people&#x2019;s actions according to the common and acceptable behaviors of others (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Borg, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Tankard and Paluck, 2016</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Cialdini et al. (1990)</xref>, social norms can be categorized as descriptive and injunctive norms. Descriptive norms refer to the behavior of the majority and injunctive norms refer to what people feel is right or what they ought to do based on their morals and beliefs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Burchell et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Cialdini et al., 1990</xref>).</p>
<p>According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Gunther and Storey (2003)</xref>, when individuals are exposed to certain information, they assume that those around them (e.g., family and friends) have also encountered the same message, leading to a presumed media influence on others. In this process, individuals often employ simple cognitive strategies, believing that media messages affect a large number of people and that these influences are reflected in others&#x2019; attitudes and behaviors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Ho et al., 2014</xref>). Social norms represent societal expectations or external standards regarding a particular action (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Cialdini et al., 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Ho et al., 2016</xref>). When individuals perceive that the media influences others, they may assume that the attitudes and behaviors promoted by the media will become more prevalent and socially accepted, which in turn shapes their own perceptions of social norms. Previous studies have revealed positive associations between individuals&#x2019; presumed media influence and their perceived social norms, including perceived description and injunctive norms. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Ho et al. (2022a)</xref> found positive relationships between presumed others&#x2019; attention to benefit messages on plant-based meat and perceived injunctive norms regarding plant-based meat consumption. Therefore, it is expected that when people perceive the media&#x2019;s impact on others, they will then perceive others&#x2019; approval of the behavior and the social commonality of the behavior, which will further affect behavioral intentions. The proposed relationship is displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Hence, I propose:</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Proposed IPMI model. Oval boxes represent latent variables.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-15-1391254-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<disp-quote>
<p>H3: Individuals&#x2019; presumed influence of messages about the benefits of having children on others will be positively related to their (a) perceived descriptive norms and (b) injunctive norms about others&#x2019; support for birth encouragement policies.</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>Personal norms are internalized self-expectations and a sense of moral obligation that guides behavior in specific contexts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Ho et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Schwartz, 1977</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Th&#x00F8;gersen, 2006</xref>). The key characteristic of personal norms is internalization, which <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Schwartz (1977)</xref> describes as the process by which expectations, obligations, and sanctions become embedded within an individual (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Bamberg et al., 2007</xref>). These norms heighten individuals&#x2019; awareness of the consequences of their actions and use moral emotions&#x2014;such as guilt, shame, and responsibility&#x2014;to motivate behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Th&#x00F8;gersen, 2006</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Ho et al. (2016)</xref> noted that personal norms offer an alternative mechanism for understanding presumed influence within the IPMI model, as they are internally driven, contrasting with the external foundation of social norms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Cialdini et al., 1990</xref>). Their research showed that personal norms can explain the indirect influence of media messages on behavior through moral responsibility and intrinsic motivation, especially in contexts with a moral dimension (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Ho et al., 2016</xref>). In China, the culture of childbearing can be summarized as &#x201C;more children, more blessings,&#x201D; a traditional belief that has endured for thousands of years and has been integrated into social norms, thereby influencing individuals&#x2019; decisions to have children (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bedford and Yeh, 2019</xref>). Media content promoting the benefits of having children frequently highlights positive values such as self-fulfillment, filial piety, and the preservation of Chinese traditions, portraying them as virtues that align with cultural ideals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bedford and Yeh, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Qian et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref83">Yu and Liang, 2022</xref>). These contents emphasized the importance of childbearing for individuals, families, and society, framing it as a means of meeting societal expectations and fulfilling moral obligations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Dong and Xu, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bedford and Yeh, 2019</xref>). Hence, supporting birth encouragement policies is therefore not merely an action aligned with social expectations, but also a way for individuals, particularly women, to fulfill responsibilities to family and society. Hence, I propose:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p>H4: The presumed influence of messages about the benefits of having children on others will be positively related to perceived personal norms regarding support for birth encouragement policies.</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>Over the past few years, China has adjusted its birth policies to counteract the adverse effects of a low birth rate on society and encourage people to have children (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref84">Zhai and Jin, 2023</xref>). These policies include loosening restrictions on the number of children, subsidizing the costs of having children, encouraging labor participation, and promoting gender equality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Billingsley and Ferrarini, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Gauthier and Philipov, 2008</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref90">Zhuang et al. (2020)</xref> argued that despite the continuous implementation of new policies, Chinese people&#x2019;s intention of having children remains low, and they have not shown support for these policies. In the study of family policy and intention to have children, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Billingsley and Ferrarini (2014)</xref> indicated that support for family policies is positively related to the intention of having children, which will in turn affect behavior. Given the importance of support for Chinese birth policies in affecting women&#x2019;s intentions and behaviors regarding having children, this study aims to examine what will affect Chinese women&#x2019;s support for Chinese birth policies.</p>
<p>Although both are components of social norms, descriptive and injunctive norms serve distinct functions in predicting and influencing behaviors: descriptive norms provide information about common actions, while injunctive norms dictate societal expectations of approval or disapproval (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Cialdini et al., 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Paek, 2009</xref>). Given their different natures, this study investigates descriptive and injunctive norms separately and examines their respective roles in the IPMI. Previous research has found that both perceived descriptive and injunctive norms were positively related to individuals&#x2019; attitudinal responses across various contexts (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Ho et al., 2022a</xref>). For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Ho et al. (2014)</xref> discovered a positive correlation between both descriptive and injunctive norms and the favorable perception of alcohol consumption. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Ho et al. (2024)</xref> identified a positive link between the perception of these norms and the intention to consume cultivated meat. However, little research has focused on the relationship between these two types of norms and public support for birth encouragement policies in the context of China. Therefore, I propose:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p>H5: Individuals&#x2019; (a) perceived descriptive norms and (b) perceived injunctive norms regarding others&#x2019; support for birth encouragement policies will be positively associated with their own support for birth encouragement policies.</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>The IPMI model suggests that individuals often perceive media content to have effects on others, and thereby adjust their attitudinal and behavioral responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Gunther and Storey, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Tal-or et al., 2010</xref>). After the Chinese government launched the birth encouragement policy, many scholars noticed how China is using government social media accounts to strengthen people&#x2019;s awareness of the risks of low birth rate (e.g., labor shortage, imbalanced population structure, decline in innovation) and the benefits of birth encouragement policies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Jing et al., 2022</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Davison (1983)</xref>, when media promotes negative behavior, individuals infer that the behavior will also have negative impacts on others. This adverse impact will stimulate people&#x2019;s awareness of the consequences, leading them to believe that they should assume social responsibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Ho et al., 2022b</xref>). At the same time, the exposure to the benefits of the birth encouragement policies in mass media will also increase people&#x2019;s awareness of the social rewards of having children, making them support the birth encouragement policies as an alternative to bearing social responsibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">Th&#x00F8;gersen, 2009</xref>).</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Ho et al. (2022b)</xref> indicated that personal norms formed by scientists&#x2019; perceptions of the influence of fake science news on others are positively related to support for relevant education and legislation. In the study on public support for green transport policy, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref88">Zhang et al. (2020)</xref> indicated that personal norms can predict the acceptance of green transport policies. Additionally, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Steg et al. (2005)</xref> found that there is a positive relationship between pro-environmental personal norms and support for energy policies. In this study, I propose that people&#x2019;s perceptions of personal norms will have positive effects on their support for China&#x2019;s birth encouragement policies. The proposed relationship is displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Therefore, I hypothesize:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p>H6: Individuals&#x2019; perceived personal norms will be positively related to their own support for birth encouragement policies.</p>
</disp-quote>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods" id="sec3">
<title>Methods</title>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Participants</title>
<p>An online survey was administered to Chinese women aged between 20 and 40, who are above the legal marriage age and within the optimal reproductive age. The survey study was conducted from October to November 2023. The respondents were recruited using the online panel service provided by a reputable market research company in China, i.e., <ext-link xlink:href="http://Wenjuanxing.com" ext-link-type="uri">Wenjuanxing.com</ext-link>. A total of 4,941 respondents were invited but only 616 Chinese females completed the whole survey. Respondents who completed the survey were compensated with points by the research company, and the survey had an approximate duration of 20&#x202F;min.</p>
<p>All the 616 respondents were aged from 20 to 40&#x202F;years old (M<sub>age</sub>&#x202F;=&#x202F;29; SD<sub>age</sub>&#x202F;=&#x202F;4.89). The median education level among the respondents was a bachelor&#x2019;s degree. The median monthly household income ranges from 6,000 to 8,999 RMB. Within the surveyed respondents, 64.6% were married, 33.6% were single, and 1.7% were divorced. In terms of parenthood, 45.9% had no children, 41.6% had one child, and 12.5% had two or more children (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Extended IPMI model. Oval boxes represent latent variables.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-15-1391254-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Measures</title>
<p>All the measures used in this study were derived from existing research, with slight adjustments made to each measurement to ensure relevance to the specific context of the current study. The measurements and descriptive statistics for all the items are displayed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>. Unless otherwise specified, all variables were evaluated through a 5-point Likert scale, which scaled from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Factor loadings of all items.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="left" valign="top">Items</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Factor loading</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">M</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SD</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">CR</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">AVE</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Citations</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="4">Self-attention to media content on the benefits of having children</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">When using social media, excluding viewing news content and watching TV programmes, how much attention do you pay to messages on:</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.493</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.845</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="4">0.764</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="4">0.518</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Ho et al. (2020)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Liao et al. (2016)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(a) The social benefits of having children (e.g., mitigating aging issues)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.744</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(b) The benefits of having children on family heritage (e.g., passing on familial traditions, values, and accumulated wealth)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.736</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(c) The emotional benefits of having children (e.g., the unique joy derived from witnessing the children&#x2019;s growth)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.679</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="4">Interpersonal communication about the benefits of having children</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">(a) How often do you discuss the benefits of having children with your family or relatives?</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">0.840</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">3.104</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">0.840</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="4">0.768</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="4">0.528</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Shi et al. (2022)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">(b) How often do you discuss the benefits of having children with your friends?</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.657</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">(c) How often do you talk to others on social media platforms about the benefits of having children?</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.667</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="4">Presumed influence of messages about the benefits of having children on others</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">How much influence do you think messages on the benefits of having children have on&#x2026;</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.179</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.767</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="4">0.762</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="4">0.517</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Ho et al. (2020)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(a) Your family members</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.725</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(b) Your close friends</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.736</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(c) General Public in China</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.694</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="4">Perceived personal norms regarding supporting birth encouragement policies</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.867</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.125</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="4">0.875</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="4">0.701</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Harland et al. (1999)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">(a) I have a strong sense of personal responsibility for supporting birth encouragement policies and consider it my duty</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.889</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">(b) I&#x2019;m willing to go the extra mile to support birth encouragement policies</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.849</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">(c) If I did not support birth encouragement policies, I would probably feel ashamed</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.770</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Perceived descriptive norms regarding supporting birth encouragement policies</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.748</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="4">0.671</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="4">0.531</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Ho et al. (2014)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Ho et al. (2020)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(a) I think my family members would support birth encouragement policies.</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.697</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(b) I think my close friends would support birth encouragement policies.</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.718</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(c) I think people in China would support birth encouragement policies.</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.768</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="4">Perceived Injunctive norms regarding supporting birth encouragement policies</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.725</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.667</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.508</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Ho et al. (2014)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Ho et al. (2020)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(a) I think my family members would approve of me supporting birth encouragement policies in China.</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.677</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(b) I think my close friends would approve of me supporting birth encouragement policies in China.</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.773</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">(c) I think people in China would approve of me supporting birth encouragement policies in China.</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.684</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">Support for birth encouragement policies</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.805</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="3">0.843</td>
<td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="3">0.456</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Ho et al. (2020)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">(a) I support China&#x2019;s policies to encourage childbirth (e.g., encourage having two or three children).</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.908</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">(b) I support China&#x2019;s economic policies that encourage childbirth (e.g., providing maternity allowances)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.737</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>CR, Composite reliability; AVE, Averaged variances extracted.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p><italic>Self-attention to media content on the benefits of having children</italic> was assessed through three items, which were modified from those used in prior research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Ho et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Liao et al., 2016</xref>). Respondents rated the degree of attention they devoted to various birth-related media messages (e.g., social benefits, benefits for family heritage, and emotional benefits) on social media, using a scale from 1 (no attention at all) to 5 (a lot of attention) (M&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.493, SD&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.845).</p>
<p><italic>Interpersonal communication about the benefits of having children</italic> was measured by 3 items adapted from previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Shi et al., 2022</xref>). Participants were required to assign a rating of 1&#x2013;5 (1&#x202F;=&#x202F;not at all; 5&#x202F;=&#x202F;very frequently), how often they had discussed the benefits of having children with (a) family or relatives, (b) close friends, (c) people on social media platforms (M&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.104, SD&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.840).</p>
<p><italic>Presumed influence of messages about the benefits of having children on others</italic> was assessed through three items that were adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Ho et al. (2020)</xref>. Participants were asked to evaluate on a 1-to-5 scale (1&#x202F;=&#x202F;not at all; 5&#x202F;=&#x202F;a lot of influence), how much influence they think messages on the benefits of having children have on each referent group (family members, close friends, general public in China) (M&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.179, SD&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.767).&#x201D;</p>
<p><italic>Perceived descriptive norms regarding others&#x2019; support for birth encouragement policies</italic> were examined through three items adapted from previous research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Ho et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Ho et al., 2020</xref>). Respondents were asked to rate on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), to what level they agree or disagree that each referent group (a) family members, (b) close friends, (c) people in China will support the birth encouragement policies in China (M&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.748, SD&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.671).</p>
<p><italic>Perceived injunctive norms regarding others&#x2019; support for birth encouragement policies</italic> were measured using three items modified from past studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Ho et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Ho et al., 2020</xref>). Respondents were asked to rate on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), to what level they agree or disagree that each referent group (a) family members, (b) close friends, (c) people in China approves of them to support the birth encouragement policies in China (M&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.725, SD&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.667).</p>
<p><italic>Perceived personal norms regarding own support for birth encouragement policies</italic> were measured using 3-item modified from previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Harland et al., 1999</xref>). On a scale of 1&#x2013;5 (1&#x202F;=&#x202F;strongly disagree; 5&#x202F;=&#x202F;strongly agree), participants were asked to evaluate to what extent they agree with the following items: (a) &#x201C;I have a strong sense of personal responsibility for supporting birth encouragement policies,&#x201D; (b) &#x201C;I am willing to go the extra mile to support for birth encouragement policies,&#x201D; and (c) &#x201C;If I did not support for birth encouragement policies, I would probably feel ashamed&#x201D; (M&#x202F;=&#x202F;2.867, SD&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.125).</p>
<p><italic>Support for birth encouragement policies</italic> were measured using 2 items, including (a) I support China&#x2019;s policies to encourage having children (e.g., encourage having two or three children), (b) I support China&#x2019;s economic policies that encourage having children (e.g., providing maternity allowances) (M&#x202F;=&#x202F;3.805, SD&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.843).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<title>Analytical approach</title>
<p>This study used the software <italic>Mplus</italic> to conduct the data analysis. The measurement model was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Structural equation modeling was employed to test the proposed structural model. I controlled for gender, age, education, number of children, and income in the data analysis. The model fit was evaluated using the following criteria: (a) the maximum likelihood chi-square (<italic>&#x03C7;</italic><sup>2</sup>) value should not be significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Schermelleh-Engel et al., 2003</xref>), (b) the relative chi-square ratio (<italic>&#x03C7;</italic><sup>2</sup>/<italic>df</italic>) should not exceed 5 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref76">Wheaton et al., 1977</xref>), (c) the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) value should be below 0.08 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">MacCallum et al., 1996</xref>), (d) the standardized root-mean-square residual (SRMR) should be below 0.08, and (e) both the comparative fit index (CFI) and Tucker&#x2013;Lewis Index (TLI) should exceed 0.95 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Hu and Bentler, 1999</xref>). Items with factor loadings below 0.55 were removed to ensure good reliability of the resulting items (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Comrey and Lee, 2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec7">
<title>Results</title>
<p>All latent variables were defined within the measurement model. The factor loadings of all items exceeded 0.60. <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref> displays the factor loadings Average Variance Extracted (AVE), and Composite Reliability (CR) of all latent variables included in this study. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the measurement model exhibited a good fit, <italic>&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup></italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;251.99, <italic>df</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;143, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001; <italic>&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>/df</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;1.76, CFI&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.97, TLI&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.96, RMSEA&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.04, SRMR&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.04. The structural equation modeling (SEM) further indicated that the extended IPMI model demonstrated an acceptable fit, <italic>&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup></italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;436.57, <italic>df</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;171, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001; <italic>&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>/df</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;2.55, CFI&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.95, TLI&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.95, RMSEA&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.05, SRMR&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.06 (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>The model fit indices of measurement model and extended IPMI model (<italic>N</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;616).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Model fit indices</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>&#x03C7;</italic><sup>2</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>df</italic></th>
<th align="center" valign="top">CFI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">TLI</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">RMSEA</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SRMR</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>&#x03C7;</italic><sup>2</sup>/<italic>df</italic></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Measurement model</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">251.99</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">143</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.97</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.96</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.76</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Structural model</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">436.57</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">171</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.95</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.94</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.55</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>H1 hypothesized the relationship between individuals&#x2019; own attention to media content about the benefits of having children and their presumed influence of such messages on others. Results indicated that individuals&#x2019; own attention to media content about the benefits of having children exhibited positive associations with their presumed influence of such messages on others (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.66, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001). Hence, H1 was supported. H2 hypothesized the associations between individuals&#x2019; interpersonal communication about the benefits of having children and their presumed influence of childbirth-related messages on others. Results demonstrated that individuals&#x2019; interpersonal communication about the benefits of having children was positively related to their presumed influence of such messages on others (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.30, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001), supporting H2.</p>
<p>H3 (a) and H3 (b) hypothesized the association between individuals&#x2019; presumed influence of messages about the benefits of having children on others and perceived descriptive and injunctive norms regarding others&#x2019; support for birth encouragement policies. Results revealed that individuals&#x2019; presumed influence of messages about the benefits of having children on others exhibited positive associations with their perceived descriptive norms (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.48, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001) and injunctive norms (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.53, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001), supporting H3 (a) and H3 (b). Additionally, H4 posited the relationship between individuals&#x2019; presumed influence of messages about the benefits of having children on others and their perceived personal norms. The findings showed that individuals&#x2019; presumed influence of messages about the benefits of having children on others was positively associated with their perceived personal norms regarding own support for birth encouragement policies (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.80, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01), thus supporting H4.</p>
<p>H5 (a) and H5 (b) Hypothesized the association between individuals&#x2019; perceived descriptive and injunctive norms regarding others&#x2019; support for birth encouragement policies and their own support for policies encouraging childbirth. Results revealed that individuals&#x2019; perceived injunctive norms were positively associated with their own support for policies encouraging childbirth (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.38, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.01), supporting H5 (a). However, the relationship between individuals&#x2019; perceived descriptive norms regarding others&#x2019; support for birth encouragement policies and their own support for policies encouraging childbirth was non-significant (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;&#x2212;0.05, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.73). Hence, H5 (a) was not supported. Additionally, H6 posited the relationship between individuals&#x2019; perceived personal norms and their support for policies encouraging childbirth. The findings showed that individuals&#x2019; perceived personal norms were positively associated with their own support for policies encouraging childbirth (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.51, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.001), thus supporting H6. Finally, the structural equation modeling results also showed the relationships between the controlled variables and individuals&#x2019; support for policies encouraging childbirth. Specifically, age (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.08, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.03) was positively related to individuals&#x2019; support for policies encouraging childbirth while education (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.01, <italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.79) was not significantly related to individuals&#x2019; support for policies encouraging childbirth.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec8">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Using the IPMI model, this research explores the indirect effects of women&#x2019;s attention to media messages about the benefits of having children on their support for birth encouragement policies in China. It examines how interpersonal communication shapes perceptions of presumed influence on others and investigates the roles of social and personal norms in shaping support for these policies. The findings of this research support most of the hypotheses, with the exception of the relationship between perceived descriptive norms and support for birth encouragement policies.</p>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>The positive relation between own attention and others&#x2019; attention</title>
<p>The IPMI model suggests that individuals base on their own attention to media messages to infer others&#x2019; attention to the same content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Eveland et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Gunther and Storey, 2003</xref>). Consistent with previous studies applying the IPMI model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Ho et al., 2022a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Hong and Kim, 2020</xref>), this research also found that personal attention to media messages about the benefits of having children is positively correlated with the presumed influence of such messages on others. Notably, we discovered that interpersonal communication is also positively and directly associated with the presumed influence of these benefit messages on others. This aligns with prior research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Shi et al., 2022</xref>), which found that interpersonal communication about COVID-19 was similarly linked to presumed attention to COVID-19-related messages. This finding can be interpreted from two perspectives. First, in China, interpersonal communication plays a crucial role in discussions about having children (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Li et al., 2023</xref>). These conversations often occur among relatives, friends, and social networks, exerting significant influence on personal decisions and attitudinal responses toward childbearing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Li et al., 2023</xref>). Additionally, interpersonal communication serves as a valuable channel for gaining insights into social issues and gauging others&#x2019; engagement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Shi et al., 2022</xref>). Therefore, it is understandable that interpersonal communication would have a positive impact on the perception of media influence on others.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>The positive relation between presumed influence and normative perceptions</title>
<p>The results indicate a positive relationship between the presumed influence of benefit messages on others and personal norms, which is consistent with previous IPMI studies examining the assumed impact of fake scientific news on others and individual standards for rejecting such misinformation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Ho et al., 2022b</xref>). Personal norms are often activated when individuals internalize expectations, obligations, and sanctions that are self-referenced (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Schwartz, 1977</xref>). Following China&#x2019;s implementation of policies promoting childbirth, the advantages of increasing birth rates&#x2014;such as reversing population decline and improving the demographic structure&#x2014;have been widely disseminated by both government social media accounts and social media influencers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Lin, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Xiong et al., 2016</xref>). Women&#x2019;s exposure to these narratives may lead them to believe that others are similarly shaped by these messages, reinforcing the perception that supporting governmental childbirth encouragement policies is not only socially expected but also a personal responsibility for the country&#x2019;s sustainable development. In China&#x2019;s collectivist context, where collective responsibilities often take precedence over individual priorities, individuals are more inclined to see national responsibilities as their own (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Tjosvold et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Triandis, 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref81">Yang et al., 2024</xref>). This perspective fosters their stronger support for government-issued policies.</p>
<p>This study also examines the correlation between presumed media influence on others and social norms, finding a positive association between perceived social norms (including both injunctive and descriptive norms) and presumed media influence on others. This finding aligns with earlier research on topics like plant-based meat and nano-enabled food products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Ho et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Ho et al., 2022a</xref>). For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Ho et al. (2022a)</xref> discussed that due to the public&#x2019;s limited familiarity with novel foods, individuals tend to rely more on their perceptions of others&#x2019; consumption behaviors to estimate the prevalence of these behaviors. Although encouraging childbirth is not a new issue in China, women still rely on their perceptions of others&#x2019; media exposure to positive content on this topic to estimate others&#x2019; reactions toward birth encouragement policies, subsequently shaping their attitudinal response (e.g., support) toward these policies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref87">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>). This finding further confirms that even on a familiar issue like childbirth, people&#x2019;s attitudinal responses can still be influenced by presumed media influence on others, mediated through normative perceptions&#x2014;namely, perceptions of most others&#x2019; behavioral and attitudinal responses.</p>
<p>The positive association between the presumed influence of childbirth-related messages and social norms can also be explained by the bandwagon effect, wherein individuals perceive attitudinal responses toward childbearing as increasingly favorable and align their attitudinal response with what they interpret as the majority opinion in society (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Henshel and Johnston, 1987</xref>). Similarly, when women are exposed to positive messages about childbirth, they often assume that others are similarly influenced, reinforcing their perception of social expectations and general acceptance of these messages. This process leads them to conform to these perceived norms to gain social approval. In a collectivist society like China, which highly values social harmony and adherence to group expectations, such influences may be even more pronounced, impacting attitudinal and behavioral responses across various domains.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>The positive relation between normative perceptions and support for policies</title>
<p>The results also indicated that injunctive norms were positively associated with support for birth encouragement policies. One possible explanation for this positive relationship is that Chinese society, as a collectivist culture deeply influenced by Confucian values, emphasizes group conformity, social orientation, and interdependence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Jiang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Wang et al., 2023</xref>). In such a context, where the cost of deviating from social expectations is high, individuals are more likely to adhere to collective norms and engage in socially desirable behaviors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Cialdini et al., 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Wang et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref82">Yin et al., 2018</xref>). Furthermore, in China, government policies are often viewed as reflective of the prevailing societal expectations for individual behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Du et al., 2022</xref>). In a society that places a high value on conformity and alignment with governmental directives, supporting state policies is seen as behavior that aligns with social approval (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref89">Zhou and Sun, 2017</xref>). The ongoing introduction of favorable birth policies can be interpreted as a societal or governmental signal to promote childbirth. This perception of approval contributes to the positive association between injunctive norms and support for these policies.</p>
<p>Additionally, the findings demonstrate a positive correlation between personal norms and support for birth encouragement policies in China. This aligns with previous research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref88">Zhang et al., 2020</xref>), which has shown a significant relationship between personal norms and the adoption of green transportation policies. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Ho et al. (2016)</xref> argued that personal norms are shaped by the assimilation of media messages, which adjust attitudinal responses by reinforcing a sense of responsibility in alignment with societal expectations. In China, childbearing is viewed as a means of achieving family continuity, fulfilling filial piety, and providing an important path for women&#x2019;s self-fulfillment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref83">Yu and Liang, 2022</xref>). In the context of China&#x2019;s low birth rate, both media narratives and birth encouragement policies convey personal obligations and social responsibilities that individuals are expected to fulfill (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref84">Zhai and Jin, 2023</xref>). When individuals learn about the positive impact of childbearing on society and family through media content, this not only makes them aware of societal expectations regarding childbearing but also fosters their recognition of the value of having children, thereby transforming this awareness into an internalized sense of personal obligations (i.e., personal norms; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Morris et al., 2015</xref>). These internalized personal norms lead individuals to support birth encouragement policies, viewing childbearing as a means of achieving personal value and fulfilling family responsibilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<title>The non-significant relation between descriptive norms and support for policies</title>
<p>While the study found support for most relationships, descriptive norms did not show a significant association with policy support. Descriptive norms are understood as behaviors that are generally considered normal or typical in society (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Cialdini et al., 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Ho et al., 2022a</xref>) The non-significant role of perceived descriptive norms on support for birth encouragement policies indicates that the prevalence of support for birth encouragement policies among social networks is still insufficient for Chinese women to generate same support for such policies. This may be because birth encouragement policies often involve deeply personal decisions influenced by economic realities, such as financial stability, housing costs, and career demands. While individuals may perceive that others support these policies, they often base their own decisions on personal economic assessments and readiness to have children (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Brehm, 1966</xref>). In China, for instance, high living costs, educational expenses, and housing affordability concerns are frequently cited as barriers to increasing family size, regardless of perceived support for government policies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Li et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">Wang and Zhou, 2021</xref>). Consequently, even perceived widespread support for birth encouragement policies may have limited influence on personal support, as individual choices are shaped by unique personal, economic, and cultural factors that descriptive norms alone may not capture in the non-significant relationship between descriptive norms and support for these policies.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>Theoretical and practical implications</title>
<p>This study offers several contributions from a theoretical perspective. First, I employed the IPMI model in an unexplored context, investigating women&#x2019;s support for birth encouragement policies in China. This study contributes to the IPMI literature by exploring the roles of interpersonal communication and personal norms in the IPMI model to explain people&#x2019;s support for birth encouragement policies in China, a topic previously underexplored in research. In line with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Shi et al. (2022)</xref>, this research demonstrates that interpersonal communication significantly influences attitudinal variables (i.e., support for birth encouragement policies) through presumed influence on others. By applying the IPMI model to examine women&#x2019;s support for birth encouragement policies, this study provides new insights into the relationships among media attention, interpersonal communication, normative factors, and attitudinal responses. It suggests that these elements indirectly shape the attitudinal response toward national demographic strategies.</p>
<p>Practically, this study offers some insights for communication practitioners and the government on disseminating birth policies in China. The results indicate that interpersonal communication positively impacts the perceived influence of media messages about the benefits of having children on others. Therefore, leveraging and enhancing interpersonal communication about the benefits of having children could significantly bolster public support for birth policies. Media professionals might explore innovative methods to simulate conversations. This might include collaborations with social media influencers and the utilization of live-streaming platforms to facilitate dynamic exchanges among individuals. In today&#x2019;s context, where interpersonal communication includes digital interactions, strategies could focus on social media engagement and collaborating with key opinion leaders (KOLs) to initiate dialogues about having children.</p>
<p>In light of the study&#x2019;s findings, future campaigns to promote having children should place a greater emphasis on personal norms rather than descriptive norms. Media narratives should pivot toward invoking a sense of personal duty and moral obligation, aiming to resonate with women&#x2019;s intrinsic values. When crafting messages, media professionals are encouraged to incorporate moral elements that strike a chord with core cultural values, such as filial piety and social responsibility, to address the population issue. Moreover, plans to have children could be positioned as a commitment that women are expected to fulfill, aligning with familial and societal anticipations. This framing could be more effective if it taps into the cultural narrative of contributing to the larger community, thereby presenting having children not just as a personal choice, but as a contribution to societal continuity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<title>Limitations and future studies</title>
<p>Firstly, this study employed a cross-sectional survey as a methodological approach to investigate the relationships between variables. Future research could employ experimental methodologies to delineate the causal linkages within the IPMI framework. Secondly, the sample was restricted to Chinese women aged 20 to 40, which provided insight primarily into the perspectives of women of reproductive age. However, support for birth encouragement policies or plans to have children are not solely determined by women and family planning decisions are often made jointly by couples. Therefore, subsequent studies could expand the demographic range to include males, as well as diverse ages, locations, ethnicities, and educational levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref79">Xu and Hu, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref86">Zhang, 2022</xref>). Thirdly, the current research did not explore additional factors that could be integrated into the IPMI model, factors that may influence women&#x2019;s support for birth encouragement policies. These include individuals&#x2019; responsiveness to risk messages associated with having children and the specific mediums (such as online platforms or face-to-face interactions) where interpersonal communication takes place. Future research endeavors could incorporate these elements to enhance the IPMI model&#x2019;s comprehensiveness and explanatory power.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec15">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>China is currently facing significant population problems and a dropping birth rate, despite the implementation of birth encouragement policies, the situation continues to deteriorate. Researchers have not yet fully understood how women&#x2019;s media attention to the messages highlighting the benefits of having children indirectly influences their support for birth encouragement policies. Drawing on the IPMI model, this study suggests that interpersonal communication, together with self-media attention, plays significant roles in influencing women&#x2019;s presumed influence of benefit messages about having children on others and their normative perceptions, which further influence their support for birth encouragement policies. This study provides valuable insights and potential suggestions for media practitioners and the government to communicate birth encouragement policies to the public in China.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec16">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec17">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>Ethical approval was not required for the studies involving humans because this study collects data through a survey questionnaire focusing on the indirect influence of social media on women&#x2019;s support for birth encouragement policies. The questionnaire is conducted anonymously, making it impossible to re-identify individuals from the data. Additionally, the content of the questionnaire does not harm the physical or psychological wellbeing of the respondents, does not involve sensitive information, has no commercial interests, and does not pertain to human life science or medical research, presenting no potential ethical or privacy risks. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec18">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>SL: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Writing &#x2013; original draft.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec19">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec20">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec21">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adair</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brase</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akao</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jantsch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>#babyfever: social and media influences on fertility desires</article-title>. <source>Personal. Individ. Differ.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>139</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.026</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baek</surname> <given-names>Y. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Fake news should be regulated because it influences both &#x201C;others&#x201D; and &#x201C;me&#x201D;: how and why the influence of presumed influence model should be extended</article-title>. <source>Mass Commun. Soc.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>323</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15205436.2018.1562076</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bamberg</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hunecke</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bl&#x00F6;baum</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: two field studies</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Psychol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>190</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>203</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.04.001</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barber</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Axinn</surname> <given-names>W. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>New ideas and fertility limitation: the role of mass media</article-title>. <source>J. Marriage Fam.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>1180</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1200</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00086.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bedford</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yeh</surname> <given-names>K.-H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The history and the future of the psychology of filial piety: Chinese norms to contextualized personality construct</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>100</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00100</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30761048</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Billingsley</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferrarini</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Family policy and fertility intentions in 21 European countries</article-title>. <source>J. Marriage Fam.</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>428</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>445</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jomf.12097</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Borg</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Media and social norms: exploring the relationship between media and plastic avoidance social norms</article-title>. <source>Environ. Commun.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>371</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>387</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/17524032.2021.2010783</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boulay</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Valente</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>The relationship of social affiliation and interpersonal discussion to family planning knowledge, attitudes and practice</article-title>. <source>Int. Fam. Plan. Perspect.</source> <volume>25</volume>:<fpage>112</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2991959</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref9">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Brehm</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1966</year>). <source>A theory of psychological reactance</source>. <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Broniarczyk</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alba</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>The role of consumers&#x2019; intuitions in inference making</article-title>. <source>J. Consum. Res.</source> <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>393</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/209406</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>B&#x00FC;hler</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fratczak</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Learning from others and receiving support: the impact of personal networks on fertility intentions in Poland</article-title>. <source>Eur. Soc.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>359</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>382</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14616690701314101</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burchell</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rettie</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Marketing social norms: social marketing and the &#x2018;social norm approach</article-title>. <source>J. Consum. Behav.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cb.1395</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Chia</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>How peers mediate media influence on adolescents&#x2019; sexual attitudes and sexual behavior</article-title>. <source>J. Commun.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>585</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>606</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00302.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Chia</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>How social influence mediates media effects on adolescents&#x2019; materialism</article-title>. <source>Commun. Res.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>400</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>419</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0093650210362463</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cialdini</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reno</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kallgren</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places</article-title>. <source>J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>1015</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1026</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref16">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Comrey</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <source>A first course in factor analysis</source>. <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Psychology Press</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Davison</surname> <given-names>W. P.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>The third-person effect in communication</article-title>. <source>Public Opin. Q.</source> <volume>47</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/268763</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Filial piety among global Chinese adult children: a systematic review</article-title>. <source>Res. Rev. J. Soc. Sci.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5296/jsss.v2i2.7827</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Collective action under social expectations: a study on the cognitive construction of public willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccination through media exposure</article-title>. <source>J. Int. Commun.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13495/j.cnki.cjjc.2022.04.008</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eveland</surname> <given-names>W. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nathanson</surname> <given-names>A. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Detenber</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McLeod</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Rethinking the social distance corollary: perceived likelihood of exposure and the third-person perception</article-title>. <source>Commun. Res.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>275</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>302</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/009365099026003001</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chui</surname> <given-names>E. W. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Development and validation of a filial piety scale for Chinese elders in contemporary China</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev.</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>176</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>200</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0091415018812399</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30472888</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gauthier</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Philipov</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Can policies enhance fertility in Europe?</article-title> <source>Vienna Yearbook Population Res.</source> <volume>2008</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1553/populationyearbook2008s1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gunther</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>The persuasive press inference: effects of mass media on perceived public opinion</article-title>. <source>Commun. Res.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>486</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>504</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/009365098025005002</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gunther</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bolt</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Borzekowski</surname> <given-names>D. L. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liebhart</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dillard</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Presumed influence on peer norms: how mass media indirectly affect adolescent smoking</article-title>. <source>J. Commun.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>52</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00002.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gunther</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Storey</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>The influence of presumed influence</article-title>. <source>J. Commun.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>199</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>215</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02586.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harland</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Staats</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilke</surname> <given-names>H. A. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior 1</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Soc. Psychol.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>2505</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2528</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00123.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Henshel</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnston</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>The emergence of bandwagon effects: a theory</article-title>. <source>Sociol. Q.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>493</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>511</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1533-8525.1987.tb00308.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chuah</surname> <given-names>A. S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koh</surname> <given-names>E. L. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kwan</surname> <given-names>V. Q. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022a</year>). <article-title>Understanding public willingness to pay more for plant-based meat: environmental and health consciousness as precursors to the influence of presumed media influence model</article-title>. <source>Environ. Commun.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>520</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>534</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/17524032.2022.2051576</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goh</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chuah</surname> <given-names>A. S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leung</surname> <given-names>Y. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bekalu</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Viswanath</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Past debates, fresh impact on Nano-enabled food: a multigroup comparison of presumed media influence model based on spillover effects of attitude toward genetically modified food</article-title>. <source>J. Commun.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>598</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>621</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/joc/jqaa019</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goh</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leung</surname> <given-names>Y. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022b</year>). <article-title>Let&#x2019;s nab fake science news: predicting scientists&#x2019; support for interventions using the influence of presumed media influence model</article-title>. <source>Journalism</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>910</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>928</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1464884920937488</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>E. W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leong</surname> <given-names>G. S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tham</surname> <given-names>T. H. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>For Fit&#x2019;s sake: a norms-based approach to healthy behaviors through influence of presumed media influence</article-title>. <source>Health Commun.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>1072</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1080</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10410236.2015.1038772</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26799846</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ou</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ong</surname> <given-names>Z. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Examining public perceptions of cultivated meat in Singapore: food neophobia and neophilia as precursors to the influence of presumed media influence model</article-title>. <source>Asian J. Commun.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>457</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>478</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01292986.2024.2342827</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poorisat</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neo</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Detenber</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Examining how presumed media influence affects social norms and adolescents&#x2019; attitudes and drinking behavior intentions in rural Thailand</article-title>. <source>J. Health Commun.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>282</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>302</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10810730.2013.811329</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24354888</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Influence of presumed media influence for health prevention: how mass media indirectly promote health prevention behaviors through descriptive norms</article-title>. <source>Health Commun.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>1800</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1810</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10410236.2019.1663585</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31496288</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hornik</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAnany</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Theories and evidence: mass media effects and fertility change</article-title>. <source>Commun. Theory</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>454</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>471</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00253.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bentler</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives</article-title>. <source>Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10705519909540118</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The influence of parent-child information in social network on fertility intention</article-title>. <source>Pop. Soc.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>79</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14132/j.2095-7963.2022.06.007</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Can Chinese residential low-carbon consumption behavior intention be better explained? The role of cultural values</article-title>. <source>Nat. Hazards</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>171</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11069-018-3461-2</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jing</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Fertility intentions to have a second or third child under China&#x2019;s three-child policy: a national cross-sectional study</article-title>. <source>Hum. Reprod.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>1907</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1918</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/humrep/deac101</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Knobloch-Westerwick</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Willis</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kennard</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Media impacts on Women&#x2019;s fertility desires: a prolonged exposure experiment</article-title>. <source>J. Health Commun.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>647</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>657</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10810730.2016.1153757</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27166510</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Traditional gender concepts, information dissemination, and women&#x2019;s fertility intentions: based on a survey study of women of childbearing age</article-title>. <source>J. Southwest Minzu Univ. (Hum. Soc. Sci.)</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>146</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>152</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1004-3926.2021.12.019</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Does China&#x2019;s fertility policy induce employment discrimination against women in labor market?</article-title> <source>Nationwide Corresp. Exp.</source> doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21203/rs.3.rs-1161948/v2</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xuan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fangyu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>&#x2018;Swinging&#x2019; fertility intentions: interaction and game between childbearing cognition and information dissemination among women of childbearing age</article-title>. <source>News Writing</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>54</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>66</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Motivators of pro-environmental behavior: examining the underlying processes in the influence of presumed media influence model</article-title>. <source>Sci. Commun.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>51</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1075547015616256</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref45">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <source>Create a good population environment for National Rejuvenation</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>People&#x2019;s Daily</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>&#x2018;Rendered anxiety&#x2019;: research on social media usage and female childbirth risk perception</article-title>. <source>Media Observer</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>79</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19480/j.cnki.cmgc.2022.06.011</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Policy communication, policy initiatives and consensus interaction: a study of the relationship between the media agenda and the policy agenda about the three-child policy</article-title>. <source>J. Xihua Univ. Philos. Soc. Sci.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12189/j.issn.1672-8505.2023.06.005</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>MacCallum</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Browne</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sugawara</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling</article-title>. <source>Psychol. Methods</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>130</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>149</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marshall</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blaylock</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murphy</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanders</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Risk messages relating to fertility and pregnancy: a media content analysis</article-title>. <source>Wellcome Open Res.</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>114</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16744.1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34286102</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martins</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peterson</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lund</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Interactive effects of social support and disclosure on fertility-related stress</article-title>. <source>J. Soc. Pers. Relat.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>371</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>388</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0265407512456672</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref51">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Master</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <source>China&#x2019;s population drops for second year, with record low birth rate</source>. <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Reuters</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Min</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>High quality development of preschool education in the context of low fertility: opportunities, challenges and responses</article-title>. <source>Res. Educ. Dev.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2023.12.010</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morris</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chiu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Normology: integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics</article-title>. <source>Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process.</source> <volume>129</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.03.001</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>China&#x2019;s population crisis and its response</article-title>. <source>J. Peking Univ. Philos. Soc. Sci.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref55">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ning</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pei</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>How media use influences the fertility intentions among Chinese women of reproductive age: a perspective of social trust</article-title>. <source>Front. Public Health</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>882009</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpubh.2022.882009</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35619808</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ou</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hansen</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Trust it or not: understanding users&#x2019; motivations and strategies for assessing the credibility of AI-generated information</article-title>. <source>New Media Soc.</source> <volume>22</volume>:<fpage>14614448241293154</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/14614448241293154</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref57">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Paek</surname> <given-names>H.-J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Differential effects of different peers: further evidence of the peer proximity thesis in perceived peer influence on college students&#x2019; smoking</article-title>. <source>J. Commun.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>434</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>455</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01423.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>S.-Y.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The influence of presumed media influence on Women&#x2019;s desire to be thin</article-title>. <source>Commun. Res.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>594</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>614</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0093650205279350</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qian</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Investigating fertility intentions for a second child in contemporary China based on user-generated content</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</source> <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>3905</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph17113905</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32486446</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref60">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schermelleh-Engel</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moosbrugger</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00FC;ller</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures</article-title>. <source>Methods Psychol. Res. Online</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref61">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Schwartz</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1977</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Normative influences on altruism</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Advances in experimental social psychology</source>. ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name><surname>Berkowitz</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>221</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>279</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref62">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsang</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Integrating interpersonal communication into the influence of presumed media influence model: understanding intentions to censor and correct COVID-19 misinformation on social media</article-title>. <source>J. Broadcast. Electron. Media</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>464</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>483</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/08838151.2022.2109638</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref63">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Southwell</surname> <given-names>B. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yzer</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The roles of interpersonal communication in mass media campaigns</article-title>. <source>Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>420</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>462</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/23808985.2007.11679072</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref64">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Steg</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dreijerink</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abrahamse</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: a test of VBN theory</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Psychol.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>415</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>425</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref65">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tal-Or</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsfati</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gunther</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Testing causal direction in the influence of presumed media influence</article-title>. <source>Commun. Res.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>801</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>824</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0093650210362684</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref66">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tal-Or</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsfati</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Influence of presumed media influence</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>The international encyclopedia of media psychology</source>. ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name><surname>Bulck</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Amsterdam</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Wiley</publisher-name>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref67">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tankard</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paluck</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Norm perception as a vehicle for social change</article-title>. <source>Social Issues Policy Rev.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>181</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>211</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/sipr.12022</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref68">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Th&#x00F8;gersen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Norms for environmentally responsible behaviour: an extended taxonomy</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Psychol.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>247</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>261</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.004</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref69">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Th&#x00F8;gersen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The motivational roots of norms for environmentally responsible behavior</article-title>. <source>Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>348</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>362</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01973530903317144</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref70">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tjosvold</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Law</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Collectivistic and individualistic values: their effects on group dynamics and productivity in China</article-title>. <source>Group Decis. Negot.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>263</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1023383200180</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref71">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Triandis</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes</article-title>. <source>Cross-Cult. Res.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/106939719302700301</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref72">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tversky</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kahneman</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1971</year>). <article-title>Belief in the law of small numbers</article-title>. <source>Psychol. Bull.</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/h0031322</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref73">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Emotional contagion and social governance of women&#x2019;s &#x2018;fertility fear&#x2019; in social media</article-title>. <source>J. SJTU</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>55</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13806/j.cnki.issn1008-7095.2023.10.005</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref74">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Social norms and tourists&#x2019; pro-environmental behaviors: do ethical evaluation and Chinese cultural values matter?</article-title> <source>J. Sustain. Tour.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>1413</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1429</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09669582.2022.2049805</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref75">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The changing trend, influencing factors and social connotations of China&#x2019;s family size</article-title>. <source>Youth Expl.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13583/j.cnki.issn1004-3780.2021.04.004</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref76">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wheaton</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muthen</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alwin</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Summers</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>Assessing reliability and stability in panel models</article-title>. <source>Sociol. Methodol.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>84</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/270754</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref77">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Predicting fact-checking health information before sharing among people with different levels of altruism: based on the influence of presumed media influence</article-title>. <source>Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>1495</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1508</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/PRBM.S404911</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37138700</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref78">
<citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source>What Preparations Should we Make for a Two-Child Society?</source> <comment>Available at:</comment> <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-03/09/content_5051093.htm" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-03/09/content_5051093.htm</ext-link> (Accessed September 29, 2024).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref79">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The effect of marriage education matching on fertility desire and behavior</article-title>. <source>Lanzhou Academic J.</source></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref80">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Threat and effectiveness: thematic analysis and influencing factors of social media&#x2019;s &#x201C;fertility fear&#x201D; discussion</article-title>. <source>Journalist</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>83</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16057/j.cnki.31-1171/g2.2023.11.006</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref81">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Crucial to me and my society: how collectivist culture influences individual pro-environmental behavior through environmental values</article-title>. <source>J. Clean. Prod.</source> <volume>454</volume>:<fpage>142211</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142211</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref82">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qian</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singhapakdi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Sharing sustainability: how values and ethics matter in consumers&#x2019; adoption of public bicycle-sharing scheme</article-title>. <source>J. Bus. Ethics</source> <volume>149</volume>, <fpage>313</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>332</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10551-016-3043-8</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref83">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Social norms and fertility intentions: evidence from China</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>947134</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2022.947134</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36467244</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref84">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhai</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>China&#x2019;s family planning policy and fertility transition</article-title>. <source>Chinese J. Sociol.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>479</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>496</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/2057150X231205773</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref85">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhai</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Influencing factors of low fertility rate in China in the new period</article-title>. <source>J. Jinan Univ.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20004/j.cnki.ujn.2023.01.012</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref86">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Influence of public&#x2019;s idea of the elderly support on fertility and healthcare services in China</article-title>. <source>Med. Soc.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13723/j.yxysh.2022.07.002</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref87">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The emergence of new generation&#x2019;s concepts of fertility in social media: content analysis based on Yang Liping&#x2019;s hot search events on Weibo</article-title>. <source>Population Soc.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>52</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14132/j.2095-7963.2021.02.005</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref88">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sheng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Do personal norms predict citizens&#x2019; acceptance of green transport policies in China</article-title>. <source>Sustain. For.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>5090</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su12125090</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref89">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Press releases and the construction of social approval: a perspective based on the interpretation of major policies</article-title>. <source>J. Writing</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>48</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref90">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhuang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Fertility intention and related factors in China: findings from the 2017 National Fertility Survey</article-title>. <source>China Population Dev. Stu.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>114</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>126</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42379-020-00053-7</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref91">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zuiderveen Borgesius</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trilling</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00F6;ller</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bod&#x00F3;</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Vreese</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Helberger</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Should we worry about filter bubbles?</article-title> <source>Int. Policy Rev.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14763/2016.1.401</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>