Front. Psychol. Frontiers in Psychology Front. Psychol. 1664-1078 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129019 Psychology Correction Corrigendum: Age differences in leadership positions across cultures Vaughan-Johnston Thomas 1 2 Imtiaz Faizan 3 Lee Albert 4 Ji Li-Jun 1 * 1Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada 2Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom 3Department of Psychology, Towson University, Towson, MD, United States 4School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

 *Correspondence: Li-Jun Ji ✉ lijunji@queensu.ca

This article was submitted to Cultural Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

 07 02 2023 2023 14 1129019 21 12 2022 19 01 2023 Copyright © 2023 Vaughan-Johnston, Imtiaz, Lee and Ji. 2023 Vaughan-Johnston, Imtiaz, Lee and Ji

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A corrigendum on Age differences in leadership positions across cultures by Vaughan-Johnston, T., Imtiaz, F., Lee, A., and Ji, L.-J. (2021). Front. Psychol. 12:703831. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703831 leadership aging culture cultural tightness business politics

In the published article, there was an error in Table 2. For “Prioritizing Male Leadership,” the a-path was stated as 0.70***, b-path as −0.84, indirect effect as −0.59 [-1.73, 0.50], and direct effect as 6.39 [2.56, 10.22]; those values are corrected to 0.39***, −0.68, −0.27 [-2.19, 1.60], and 6.07 [1.94, 10.20], respectively. For “Prioritizing Male Wages,” the a-path/b-path were stated as −0.34***/-2.48, but are corrected to 0.34***/2.48, respectively. For “Veneration of Elderly,” the a-path/b-path were stated as −0.24***/-2.37, but are corrected to 0.24***/2.37, respectively. The corrected Table 2 and its caption appear below.

Indirect effects from culture contrast to political leader age (Study 2).

Mediator a-path (culture contrast to mediator) b-path (mediator to leader age) Indirect effect (a X b) Direct effect n for analysis
Prioritizing Male Leadership 0.39*** −0.68 −0.27 [-2.19, 1.60] 6.07 [1.94, 10.20] 261
Prioritizing Male Wages 0.34*** 2.48 0.85 [-0.31, 2.02] 4.96 [1.13, 8.79] 261
Science/Utilitarianism 0.44*** −1.09 −0.48 [-1.52, 0.50] 6.29 [2.50, 10.07] 261
Science/Core Values −0.49*** 0.97 −0.47 [-1.43, 0.43] 6.28 [2.49, 10.07] 261
Veneration of Elderly 0.24*** 2.37 0.57 [-0.23, 1.40] 5.23 [1.48, 8.99] 261
Distance/Sexually Stigmatized 0.25*** 3.18 0.81 [-0.48, 2.15] 5.68 [1.64, 9.72] 249
Distance/Culture 0.07*** 8.44 0.63 [0.00, 1.45] 5.18 [1.45, 8.91] 261
Cultural Tightness 16.31*** 0.06** 1.02 [0.28, 1.84] 9.00 [5.75, 12.25] 440

**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Values in square brackets refer to 95% confidence intervals.

In the published article, there was also an error in the text. A correction has been made to Results, Preregistered Linear Modeling Tests, paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated:

“That is, compared to Western countries, Eastern countries tended to prioritize male over female leadership (but male wages less), valued the utilitarian benefits of science more (with less belief that science undermines morality), venerated the elderly less, had more desire to be distanced both from sexually stigmatized groups and from cultural minority groups, and were culturally tighter.”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“That is, compared to Western countries, Eastern countries tended to prioritize male over female leadership and wages, valued the utilitarian benefits of science more (with less belief that science undermines morality), venerated the elderly more, had more desire to be distanced both from sexually stigmatized groups and from cultural minority groups, and were culturally tighter.”

The authors apologize for this error and state that it does not change the primary scientific conclusions of the article. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.