Our search identified 5 studies investigating the efficacy of different versions of KET: 1 case series on AUD (Kolp et al., 2006), 1 case study on end-of-life distress (Kolp et al., 2007), 2 RCTs on heroin dependence (Krupitsky et al., 2002; Kolp et al., 2007), and 1 observational study on AUD (Krupitsky and Grinenko, 1997).

KEP, also sometimes referred as KPT or Ketamine Assisted Psychotherapy, was first introduced (albeit with a different name: affective contra attribution) in a 1992 clinical study on the treatment of alcoholism. It made use of other drugs in addition to ketamine (i.e., aethimizol and bemegride) during a single drug session to enhance emotional experiences and promote the consolidation of memories (Krupitsky et al., 1992; Krupitsky and Grinenko, 1997). Despite ketamine being a dissociative agent that does not act on 5-HT2A receptors as classical psychedelics do (Green et al., 2011), the authors often refer to it and to the experiences it produces as psychedelic. The model was developed in an attempt to integrate the establishment of aversive associations with a previously appetitive stimulus (i.e., aversive conditioning) with the shift in attitudes toward alcohol that psychedelic therapy seemed to promote in earlier studies (Krupitsky et al., 1992). In a later review article (Krupitsky and Grinenko, 1997), the authors describe this three-step approach in greater detail.

In the first stage, preparation is carried out over a 3-month period and aims at preparing patients by informing them about the different states of consciousness they will experience. An exploration of personal motives and goals for treatment along with beliefs concerning the cause of the disease is also carried out. Establishing positive expectations toward the outcome of the experience is considered another important part of preparation together with the co-construction of the therapeutic myth; the latter refers to a therapeutic narrative constructed by the therapist and the patient that could describe and explain the patients' suffering and hint at ways to resolve it (Frank and Frank, 1993). The session should integrate elements from the patients' personal life in an atmosphere of confidence and understanding. More specifically, patients are told that they may experience insights (e.g., on their personal problems, values, beliefs about themselves or the world) leading to adaptive changes in personality and that the psychedelic experience is instrumental in acknowledging the negative effects of alcohol abuse and the positive aspects of sobriety. Furthermore, they are instructed to fully surrender to the experience and are informed that the causes for their alcoholism are unconscious in nature, related to more central personality issues and that such causes will manifest themselves during the experience in symbolic form.

The second stage is the drug session, which is conducted by a psychiatrist and an anaesthesiologist. It includes the use of aethimizol (1.5% 3 ml, i.m.) to promote the consolidation of memory, bemegride (0.5% 1 0 mL, i. v.) to intensify emotional experience, and ketamine (2.5 mg/kg, i.m.) to achieve a psychedelic experience lasting between 45 and 60 min. During the session, new age/soothing instrumental music (Krupitsky and Grinenko, 1997; Krupitsky et al., 2002) is used with the intention to promote symbolic resolution of inner conflicts and facilitating cathartic experiences. Additionally, patients are exposed to so-called “psychotherapeutic influences,” i.e., therapist interventions that are “based on the concrete data of the patient's case history and [are] directed toward the resolution of the patient's personality problems and toward the formation of a stable orientation toward sobriety.” At the peak of the experience, while the therapist aims at shifting the focus of the experience toward the dysfunctional aspects of alcohol abuse (e.g., “Your fear is a result of vodka. It is vodka that has led you to the edge of the abyss”), patients are given the chance to smell alcohol to establish aversion toward the substance. Once the dissociative effects subside, the experience is discussed and interpretations are offered. Finally, patients are asked to write down a detailed report of the session (Krupitsky and Grinenko, 1997).

The third and final stage of KPT consists of a variable number of group psychotherapy sessions carried out the day after the drug session. In this context, the psychiatrist promotes integration via discussion, interpretation of the experience and consideration of lifestyle changes.

In the original 1992 paper, the authors employed this model to treat 86 male AUD patients and reported a remission rate of 69.8% at 1 year compared to 24% of the control group. KPT (in combination with existential psychotherapy) was also used to treat heroin addiction (Krupitsky et al., 2002) and was subsequently adapted to Ketamine-Enhanced Psychotherapy (KEP) to reportedly “extend it into another cultural context: the US” (Kolp et al., 2007). In this latter form, the treatment was used to treat end-of-life anxiety with the following structure: 3 weekly preparation sessions (75–80 min), one ketamine session (1–3 h) and a final integration session (75–80 min). KEP was also offered to patients suffering from alcoholism in two other formats: outpatient and intensive. The outpatient format consists of 3 preparation sessions, one of which is devoted to the formulation of a “psychospiritual” goal: a therapeutic objective that integrates the patients' personal motives for treatment, their goals for their future sober life and spiritual growth (Wolfson and Hartelius, 2016). By the latter, authors refer to a multitude of feelings, experiences and attitudes that usually concern feeling unity with others and the universe, increased chance of converting to a religion, experiencing a so-called “separation of consciousness from the body,” the feeling of being in contact with a higher power, the belief in the existence of “other dimensions or worlds that are parallel to ours” and similar other transpersonal phenomena. The treatment then proceeds with 1 ketamine session and 3 integration sessions (Kolp et al., 2006; Krupitsky et al., 2007). All integration sessions had the same structure and lasted 50 min; the ketamine session lasted for 3 h.

The intensive format had the same general structure of outpatient KPT and added daily all-day activity programs including psychotherapeutic and psychoeducation groups along with training in mind-body techniques. Initial data were collected in a clinical study in Russia in which the percentage of abstinent patients at 1 year post-treatment in a KPT group was compared with that of a control group (Krupitsky et al., 2007). The authors of the Russian study reported that 65% of patients in the KPT group (n = 111) remained abstinent compared to 24% (n = 100) in the control group. In the U.S., several adaptations of this model were created in an attempt to replicate results and progressively improve its efficacy even more (Kolp et al., 2006). In the first attempt the authors maintained the same structure of KPT as described above but condensed it in a 10-session, 10-week program which comprised 1 screening session, 4 preparation sessions, 1 goal-setting session, 1 ketamine session and 3 integration sessions. Contrary to expectations, this treatment led to an abstinence rate of only 25% in a group of 20 patients. Subsequently, the model was adapted to take place in a residential group setting and as such substituted the individual sessions with 30 weekly hours of psychoeducation, group activities, guided imagery exercises along with breathing, meditation, yoga, and cooking classes. The authors reported the results of 3 iterations of this model with each lasting, respectively, 1 week (35% 1-year abstinence rate, n = 15), 2 weeks (60% 1-year abstinence rate, n = 10), and 3 weeks (70% 1-year abstinence rate, n = 15). In all 3 iterations, patients with a history of psychedelic use were excluded at screening (Kolp et al., 2006). In summary, this treatment format progressively increased the 1-year abstinence rates over 1 (35%), 2 (60%), and 3 (70%) weeks of treatment.

In a double-blind, active-placebo controlled study, 70 detoxified patients suffering from heroin addiction were randomized into two groups employing KPT (Krupitsky et al., 2007). Both groups received 10 h of preparatory existential psychotherapy, 1 ketamine only infusion session (i.e., no other drugs were administered) and 5 more hours of integration psychotherapy. While one group received a high dose (2.0 mg/kg i.m.), the other received a low non-dissociative dose (0.20 mg/kg i.m.). Results showed improved abstinence, relapse rates, craving, and anhedonia in the high dose group while both groups showed improvements in anxiety, depression, internal locus of control, understanding of the meaning and purpose in life and spiritual development. The abstinence rate was about 85% at the 1-month assessment, about 18% at the 24 months follow-up and remained significantly higher for the KPT group over all timepoints. A subsequent study suggested that increasing the number of both ketamine (2.0 mg/kg i.m.) and integration sessions from 1 to 2 may lead to better abstinence rates at the 1-year follow-up (Krupitsky et al., 2007).

KEP was also used in two case studies (a success and a failure) involving a 62-year-old female and a 46-year-old male patients diagnosed with life-threatening illnesses and suffering from death-related anxiety (Kolp et al., 2007). The authors' intention was to highlight how certain patient characteristics may modulate treatment efficacy. While the female patient reported remission from panic attacks, discontinuation of morphine and lorazepam, increased feelings of comfort, the male patient did not resolve his death anxiety. This difference in clinical outcomes was attributed to the fact that while the woman was willing to discontinue benzodiazepine and decrease opiate use before the session, the man did not. They also pointed out that the woman never used psychedelics before while the man had an extensive history of psychotropic drug use. The authors of this paper seem to suggest that the efficacy of KEP is moderated by history of psychedelic use and they further hypothesize that the “novelty factor” associated with these substances may play a role in improving outcomes. Finally, they suggest that the concurrent use of other CNS depressants may diminish the patients' response to ketamine and potentially cause amnesia of the experience thus hindering therapeutic response.

In summary, across the literature KET is delivered in different formats. It proposes at least 3 preparation sessions, 1 drug session and at least 1 integration session. When administered in residential settings, it may be complemented by other activities and may include an additional drug session. Existential psychotherapy is the most cited model associated with the treatment and principles of behavioral therapy were incorporated in its original conceptualization. The role of therapists appears more directive compared with other models as clinicians are expected to actively work to establish positive expectations about the treatment, provide personality-related etiologies to explain AUD, and work to establish a structured therapeutic myth.

We identified 5 papers describing the efficacy of MAP in the context of a RCT (Ross et al., 2016; Belser et al., 2017; Swift et al., 2017; Malone et al., 2018; Agin-Liebes et al., 2020). MAP is a treatment model originally developed by Grof et al. (1973) and Grof and Halifax (1978) to be used in palliative care settings but that has been applied in the treatment of other conditions as well. Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) or Dipropyltryptamine (DPT) was administered in combination with psychotherapy to treat depression, anxiety and pain, and address existential issues in patients suffering from life-threatening illnesses. More recently, the model was used in conjunction with psilocybin administration (Ross et al., 2016; Belser et al., 2017; Agin-Liebes et al., 2020).

In its original structure (Grof et al., 1973; Grof and Halifax, 1978), MAP proposes 6–12 h of preparatory psychotherapy held over the period of 2–3 weeks focusing on the patients' present goals and issues instead of focusing on personal history and remote unresolved issues. Preparatory sessions are aimed at establishing rapport, working on family issues, addressing potential significant intrapsychic conflicts, confronting and accepting diagnosis, prognosis, and death. The overarching goal of the therapeutic model is to facilitate patients in living their days in the fullest and most meaningful way possible. Special attention is placed on preventing feelings of isolation and, therefore, the involvement of family members is encouraged. Once a good therapeutic relationship is formed and relevant issues are explored, patients are given more in-depth information concerning psychedelic sessions and the altered state of consciousness that they will experience. A session with the substance is then held by two trained facilitators in an appropriately furnished room where music can be played. Early accounts (Grof et al., 1973; Grof and Halifax, 1978) propose the use of family photographs to facilitate the resolution of relational problems and to promote the emergence of positive feelings.

More modern versions of MAP (Ross et al., 2016) encourage patients to bring items of personal and/or spiritual significance, to participate in acts (e.g., holding hands) aimed at conveying comfort and unity between the patient and the therapy team before the beginning of the session and to set their intentions toward finding relief from the psychological and existential suffering brought by cancer. During the course of the psychedelic experience, patients lie down wearing eye-shades and are invited to direct attention toward their internal experience. Therapists will remain present during the whole duration of the session and will offer non-verbal (e.g., holding hands, cradling, rocking) psychological and medical support when needed. During the final phases of the session, when the effects of the substance begin to subside, patients are encouraged to discuss their subjective experience in order to consolidate its memory. This phase was compared to psycholytic therapy (Crocket et al., 1963; Leuner, 1967; Gasser, 1996; Majić et al., 2015; Ross et al., 2016), an approach in use in the ‘60s in which patients would take smaller doses of psychedelics to facilitate the emergence of material during psychotherapy sessions. This process constitutes the first step of the subsequent integration work. Relatives can be invited during the termination period of the drug session. Integrative sessions, usually three, are held after each drug session and are meant to consolidate the memory of the experience and promote the processing of the emerged material.

MAP was recently used in a crossover RCT involving patients suffering from life-threatening cancer (Ross et al., 2016). The trial design involved a single psilocybin (or niacin) session (0.3 mg/kg, p.o.), three 2-h preparation sessions, three 2-h integration sessions and targeted depression and anxiety levels as primary outcomes. Psychotherapeutic work integrated elements drawn from evidence-based psychotherapies addressed to patients with life-threatening illnesses such as supportive psychotherapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, existentially oriented psychotherapies, and psychodynamic psychotherapy. Results show that the treatment led to significant improvements in demoralization and hopelessness, spiritual wellbeing and quality of life. These changes occurred rapidly after the psilocybin sessions and were maintained at the 6.5 month follow-up. At that time, patients showed lower existential distress and better attitudes toward death. Response rates for depression were about 80% for the psilocybin group and between 20 and 30% (depending on the outcome measure) for the niacin group at the 1-day post session timepoint. Remission rates at the same timepoint were between 80 and 85% for the psilocybin group and between 20 and 30% for the niacin group. At the 7-week post session timepoint response rates were between 70 and 83% for the psilocybin group and between 14 and 40% in the niacin group. Remission rates at this timepoint were between 70 and 80% for the psilocybin group and between 20 and 40% for the niacin group. Response rates at the 1-day post session timepoint for anxiety were about 75% in the psilocybin group and about 40% in the niacin group. At the 7-week post session timepoint response rates were 58% for the psilocybin group and 14% for the niacin group. At the 6.5 months follow up, after the crossing over, response rates varied between 60 and 80% for depression and between 60 and 75% for anxiety. Long-term follow up (4.5 years) analyses of a subsample of patients from the above-mentioned study revealed that response rates were 57% for anxiety and ranged between 57 and 79% for depression. Remission rates ranged between 50 and 79% (Belser et al., 2017; Agin-Liebes et al., 2020). An earlier single sample, pre-post study (Pahnke et al., 1969) tested the efficacy of this model (using LSD, between 200 and 500 μg p.o. or dipropyltryptamine, between 60 and 105 mg i.m.) on a group of 31 cancer patients. Results showed “dramatic improvement” in 20% of patients, “moderate improvement” in 41.9% and no improvement in 22.6%. A very similar model, albeit labeled Psychedelic Peak Therapy (PPT), was described in a case series study (Kurland, 1985), which described the effects it had on 2 female patients suffering from breast cancer, 1 female patient suffering from pancreatic cancer and 1 female patient suffering from cancer to the uterine cervix. The authors reported improvements in all four patients in measures of mood, optimism and pain management.

In summary, MAP proposes 6–12 h of preparation, 1 drug session held by two trained facilitators and 3 integration sessions. The therapeutic model is eclectic, unstructured and integrates elements from multiple and diverse theoretical frameworks.

Our search identified 12 papers (one of which analyzed the pooled results of 6 separate studies) describing the findings of investigations conducted on 6 separate samples (1 case series, 3 RCTs, 1 pooled analysis of 6 RCTs) that used MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (MDMA-AP) (Bouso et al., 2008; Mithoefer et al., 2011, 2013, 2018, 2019; Oehen et al., 2013; Ot'alora et al., 2018; Barone et al., 2019; Jerome et al., 2020; Wolfson et al., 2020; Jardim et al., 2021; Mitchell et al., 2021). Furthermore, we identified two papers that were based on the same small-sample within-subject study applying the model in an observational study on Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD; Sessa et al., 2019, 2021).

MDMA-AP (Mithoefer, 2016) is a structured approach to PAT that was developed by the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS). MDMA-AP is an attempt to harness the pharmacological effects of MDMA to enhance psychotherapy effectiveness and aims at reducing or eliminating symptoms and achieving better functioning and wellbeing (Mithoefer, 2016). More specifically, the premise is that the substance-induced reduction in fear, increased interpersonal trust and positive emotions toward oneself and others will facilitate a corrective re-experiencing of the traumatic event in the context of a caring and supportive therapeutic relationship.

This treatment is based on earlier contributions by authors who proposed the use of psychedelics in psychotherapeutic settings (Pahnke et al., 1970; Greer and Tolbert, 1998), decisively relies on both preparation and integration sessions and adopts a seemingly non-directive, non-judgmental and empathetic approach to therapy (Mithoefer, 2016). The fundamental idea entails recruiting the patient's “inner healing intelligence”—i.e., “a person's innate capacity to heal the wounds of trauma” (Mithoefer, 2016)—to facilitate the processing of trauma through direct confrontation, mind-body techniques and a mindful and accepting mindset toward the MDMA-elicited internal experiences (Mithoefer, 2016). Therapists are encouraged to adopt a “beginner's mind”—i.e., an attitude that considers “any experience as an opportunity to heal and develop trust in their own inner healing intelligence”—while being receptive to potential hidden meanings and sources of insights emerging from the experience (Mithoefer, 2016).

To conduct MDMA-AP, therapists must undergo a specific training, should be proficient in administering treatments for PTSD, are encouraged to learn Holotropic Breathwork to gain experience with different states of consciousness, Internal Family Systems Therapy to learn how to work with multiple parts of the self, Sensorimotor Psychotherapy and/or mindfulness-based methods along with other breathing and bodywork techniques to help patients remain focused on the present experience and process trauma through their bodies (Mithoefer, 2016). Preliminary phases include the preparation of an appropriate physical setting and the adoption of mindsets and techniques that are thought to facilitate the therapeutic process on the therapists' part (Mithoefer, 2016).

The room in which the MDMA sessions will be held should be private, quiet, comfortable, well-furnished and allow for the presence of two therapists and music during the course of the experience (Mithoefer, 2016). Therapists are required to support patients through somatic manifestation of traumas, accept potential transpersonal experiences that may emerge during drug sessions and be ready to work with multiple parts of a patient's self. Such multiplicity is defined by the authors as a healthy phenomenon that “may be more pronounced in people who have experienced trauma” (Mithoefer, 2016). MDMA-AP places emphasis on preparation sessions as a means to determine patient eligibility, establish a functional therapeutic alliance, gather information about personal and trauma history, enquire about expectations, address concerns and prepare patients for the subsequent phases of the treatment (Mithoefer, 2016). Clinical studies usually include 2–3 preparation sessions each lasting 60–90 min (Bahji et al., 2020) which focus on personal history, therapeutic alliance and preparation of patients for the psychedelic session (Mithoefer, 2016). The general aim is to establish a sense of safety and comfort, an attitude of curiosity toward inner experience and trust toward one's inner healing intelligence (Mithoefer, 2016).

Unless medical or psychological contraindications are present, patients will take part in one or more drug sessions several weeks apart. MDMA sessions, 1–3 in clinical studies (Bahji et al., 2020), last 6–8 h and are facilitated by two co-therapists, preferably one female and one male (Mithoefer, 2016). Therapists are required to maintain an empathic presence and to seek a balanced attitude between keeping in mind the patients' intentions for the session and being open to the emergence of unexpected perceptions or memories, or ideas (Mithoefer, 2016). Therapeutic interventions are non-directive and encourage patients to adopt a similar attitude toward the experience (Mithoefer, 2016). In fact, they are advised to follow the spontaneous evolution of the experience and to trust their inner healing intelligence (Mithoefer, 2016). Painful memories, perceptions and ideas may emerge and, should therapists observe the adoption of avoidant attitudes on the patients' part, they should encourage them to mindfully confront such material and advise them on techniques they can use to work through the emotional distress (Mithoefer, 2016). Regular check-ins with silent patients are recommended in order to learn about their psychological state and experience (Mithoefer, 2016). During the later part of the session, while the effects of the substance begin to subside, therapists are advised to ask whether the patient is willing to provide more details about their experience (Mithoefer, 2016). These may be further discussed during follow-up (integration) sessions (Mithoefer, 2016). Patients are accompanied until the end of the session and are helped in resolving any potential emotional or physical distress that may persist (Mithoefer, 2016). Once the session is over, patients may be offered to spend the night in the treatment facility where their mental and physical state will be monitored by the clinical staff (Mithoefer, 2016). They can invite a significant other in. The morning after the MDMA session, the first integration session takes place (Mithoefer, 2016).

Integrative sessions-−2–3 in clinical studies (Bahji et al., 2020) aim at integrating the experience in the patients' ongoing therapeutic process and everyday life and usually last 60–90 min (Mithoefer, 2016). MDMA-AP rests on the assumption that the effects of the treatment will continue to unfold between sessions and after the treatment program is complete (Mithoefer, 2016). Patients are therefore informed that new insights, improvements in resilience, emotional wellbeing and relational skills may keep occurring (Mithoefer, 2016). Furthermore, should they experience psychological problems or suffering as a result of the MDMA-induced experience, integration sessions can be used to tackle such issues and define the therapeutic trajectory (Mithoefer, 2016). In this phase, therapists answer patients' questions, adopt a supportive and validating attitude toward the experience and encourage them to process new insights concerning their trauma, history, relationships and personal life (Mithoefer, 2016). The non-directive character of the therapy is maintained through the integration phase and while interpretations by the therapist are allowed, they “should be minimized” (Mithoefer, 2016). Integrative work begins the morning after the first MDMA session (Mithoefer, 2016). Patients are invited to discuss their experience in greater detail. Therapeutic work may be complemented by focused bodywork (e.g., “giving resistance for the participant to push against;” Mithoefer, 2016), breathing techniques and other approaches to facilitate the processing of the emerged material (e.g., trauma-related memories and physical sensations) through arousal regulation (Mithoefer, 2016). Before the closing of the treatment program, patients' potential concerns and questions must be addressed and the techniques and procedures that they found useful can be reviewed and consolidated.

MDMA-AP has been tested in several studies investigating its potential in the treatment of PTSD in various populations. A recent review and meta-analysis reported high rates of clinical response (72%) and more than 2 times the probability of achieving remission in the experimental groups with large effect sizes in symptom reduction at long term follow-up (between 12 and 74 months; Bahji et al., 2020). A study which tested this model plus elements from third wave CBT and MET as a potential treatment for AUD reported that in a sample of 14 previously detoxified patients, an 8-week course of MDMA-AP led to a significant drop in average units consumed per week from baseline (130.6 units/week) to the 9 months follow up (18.7 units/week) in 11 patients (79%) with 9 patients (64%) who were completely abstinent (Sessa et al., 2021). Finally, MDMA-AP was used to treat anxiety associated with life-threatening illnesses in a sample of 18 patients in a randomized pilot study (Wolfson et al., 2020). While the MDMA-AP group reported greater reductions in anxiety, the difference failed to reach the significance threshold.

In summary, MDMA-AP proposes 2–3 preparation sessions, 1–3 drug sessions held by two facilitators (preferably a male and a female) and 2–3 integration sessions per drug session. The therapeutic model places emphasis on non-directiveness, provides suggestions that highlight the role of the inner healing intelligence (the construct considered responsible for clinical change by the authors), aims at establishing positive expectations about the treatment and enquires about those of patients, allows for therapist direction of the session in case avoidant tendencies are observed and encourages interpretation and search for hidden meanings on the therapist side. Furthermore, bodywork techniques, mindfulness and sensorimotor psychotherapy are considered valuable tools to work through the physical manifestations of trauma. Given that the patients' psyche is conceptualized as made of several parts, elements from Internal Family Systems therapy are used throughout all phases of treatment.

Our search identified 7 papers describing the findings of 1 open-label feasibility study employing the PSI model to treat patients suffering from Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) (Carhart-Harris et al., 2016, 2018a; Watts et al., 2017; Erritzoe et al., 2018; Roseman et al., 2018; Stroud et al., 2018; Mertens et al., 2020).

PSI (Carhart-Harris et al., 2018a) is a psilocybin-assisted model to treat TRD. The model is briefly outlined in two papers (Carhart-Harris et al., 2016; Stroud et al., 2018) describing the outcomes of an open-label feasibility study. It comprises one 4-h preparation session aimed at building a trusting relationship and encouraging patients to talk about their personal history and their hypotheses concerning the origin of their depression. They receive information concerning psilocybin's psychological effects and take part in a drug-free simulation of the psychedelic session. The two dosing sessions (10 and 25 mg, p.o.) take place 1 week apart and are held in a pre-decorated room in which patients can lie supine wearing eye shades and listen to music. Two psychiatrists supervise the session and adopt a non-directive approach. The aim is to facilitate an “uninterrupted journey” for patients while regularly performing check-ins to keep track of their physiological and psychological state. Once the first session is over, patients are taken back home by a close friend or a relative and are contacted via telephone the next day to evaluate their wellbeing and monitor for adverse effects. Two, 3, and 5 weeks after the second dosing session, email assessments of clinical progress are performed. One final follow-up is performed remotely 3 months after the last high-dose psilocybin session. In another description, the model also includes an integration session held the day after dosing in which patients are invited to talk about their experiences and are met with compassionate listening and occasional interpretations to promote and consolidate positive change (Carhart-Harris et al., 2018a; Stroud et al., 2018).

Results reported in the open-label TRD papers show improvements in severity of self-reported depressive and anxiety symptoms 1 week, 3 months (n = 12), and 6 months (n = 19) after dosing (Carhart-Harris et al., 2016, 2018a). Remission rates were 67% at 1 week and 42% at 3 months while response rates were 58% at 3 months and 31% at 6 months. The 6-month follow-up study also reported decreases in suicidality at 1 and 2 weeks post-treatment (Carhart-Harris et al., 2018a). Further evidence shows that psilocybin and PSI improve processing of emotional faces in TRD patients (Stroud et al., 2018) and that clinical improvements seem to be predicted by the quality of the psychedelic experience (Roseman et al., 2018). Finally, the authors reported significant decreases in neuroticism and increases in extraversion and openness to experience (Erritzoe et al., 2018).

In summary, PSI proposes one 4-h preparation session, 1 drug session held by two psychiatrists and 1 integration session. The theoretical model is broadly described as non-directive and the therapists take an active role during preparation in gathering the hypotheses that participants have concerning the origin of their depression. During the integration phase, therapists are required to offer compassionate listening as well as provide interpretations and facilitate the consolidation of positive change.

Our search identified 2 papers investigating the efficacy of TIMBER on a single sample in the context of a RCT (Pradhan et al., 2017, 2018). TIMBER is a psychotherapeutic model conceived to treat PTSD (Pradhan et al., 2017) through the application of the principles of extinction, reconsolidation and arousal regulation. It employs mindfulness techniques and was used to improve the stability of clinical gains that were obtained in a previous study employing ketamine as a therapeutic agent (Feder et al., 2014). TIMBER, in its short version, is administered in the course of a 60-min period and begins with a 10-min reactivation of traumatic memories (Pradhan et al., 2017). More specifically, patients are asked to recall a traumatic event through a pre-prepared personalized script with the objective of activating arousal responses for the following 2–3 min. The 40-min infusion period with 0.5 mg/kg (R, S)-ketamine is then initiated and patients are asked to recall calming memories and to practice the STOPP [Stop, Three mindful breaths, Observe, Practice more, Proceed (Pradhan and Pinninti, 2016)] mindfulness procedure for 5 min to de-escalate emotions such as frustration, anger, anxiety and reduce impulsivity. The goal of this phase is to achieve a state referred to as mindfulness-based detached monitoring.

In a small placebo-controlled, cross-over study (Pradhan et al., 2017), 10 patients with chronic and refractory PTSD were randomized in two groups to receive TIMBER with ketamine (dose, i.v.) or placebo (saline solution). The first session of both programs was the infusion session followed by 11 non-infusion sessions of which two were held in the same week of the infusion while the rest took place on a weekly basis. The psychotherapeutic model for the remaining 9 sessions was the same as that detailed above. Findings showed that before cross-over 9 out of 10 participants reported improvements in PTSD symptoms, depression and anxiety measures independent of group allocation. No significant differences in the magnitude or duration of treatment effects were observed between the two groups. A subsequent extension of the study including 10 additional patients demonstrated a statistically significant 108% increase in response duration (18 days on average) after TIMBER with ketamine compared to TIMBER with placebo (Pradhan et al., 2018).

Our search identified 3 papers on 1 open-label study employing psychedelic-assisted SEGT to treat demoralization in a sample of demoralized older long-term male AIDS survivors (Anderson et al., 2020; Agin-Liebes et al., 2021; Stauffer et al., 2021). SEGT is a model that was created in the context of palliative care (Classen et al., 1993) and was adapted for use with HIV-infected patients (Maldonado et al., 1996). As described in SEGT manual (Maldonado et al., 1996), the treatment aims at creating an environment of mutual support to contrast the feelings of isolation that are often a consequence of receiving this diagnosis (Maldonado et al., 1996). Patients are encouraged and helped in disclosing their condition to their loved ones and in learning how to ask for the support they need (Maldonado et al., 1996). This is especially relevant when it comes to intimate relationships and importance is placed into promoting conscious and safe sexual practices (Maldonado et al., 1996). Cultivating openness and expression of both positive and negative emotions is a primary goal of the treatment in order to relieve and encourage patients in their personal journeys (Maldonado et al., 1996). Emphasis is given in integrating the changes in self and body image (Maldonado et al., 1996). In fact, patients may find themselves in the position of requiring help in everyday activities for the first time in their lives and such experience may be troubling for some (Maldonado et al., 1996). Furthermore, the onset of opportunistic infections and other related pathologies may lead to changes in appearance that may need therapeutic work to facilitate acceptance and adaptation (Maldonado et al., 1996). After the diagnosis, patients find themselves tackling new challenges in life and, to support them, SEGT strives to expand and improve their coping skills through the experience of their fellow group members and therapist contribution (Maldonado et al., 1996). The development of a life project is encouraged and exploration of life values is intended as a tool to help clarify personal goals (Maldonado et al., 1996). Self-hypnosis is taught as a way to manage pain, improve sleep quality and deal with stress (Maldonado et al., 1996). Given the central role that pharmacological therapy has in the management of the infection and the high risk of poor adherence to treatments, patients are encouraged to be actively involved with the medical staff to promote a good doctor-patient relationship (Maldonado et al., 1996). Finally, receiving the HIV diagnosis may be the first time in which patients are confronted with their own mortality and therapists are instructed to address death related issues, avoidance behaviors and patterns of thoughts to allow group members to explicitly talk about death (Maldonado et al., 1996). Throughout the duration of the treatment, interaction between group members is actively pursued and the focus of the discussion is kept on personal and concrete issues related to HIV/AIDS in a climate of empathy and unconditional positive regard (Maldonado et al., 1996). SEGT sessions are 90 min long and are conducted by two co-therapists who have experience in working with patients with HIV (Maldonado et al., 1996).

SEGT was used as an adapted model in conjunction with psilocybin sessions in studies aimed at testing its effectiveness in treating demoralization in male older long-term AIDS survivors (Anderson et al., 2020). This integration model included a 90-min psychotherapy session held before group initiation in which patients received psychoeducation on group therapy and psilocybin. Patients underwent 12–15 h of group psychotherapy over the course of 7 weeks and took part in 1 8-h individual psilocybin session (0.30–0.36 mg/kg p.o.). Finally, a second 2-h individual psychotherapy session was held the day after the psilocybin session. The self-hypnosis module of SEGT was replaced by breathing and mindfulness exercises with the intention of providing patients with techniques they could use during dosing sessions. Results showed clinically relevant change in demoralization (Anderson et al., 2020) and significant reductions in self-reported attachment anxiety at the 3-month follow-up (Stauffer et al., 2021). Regarding response rates, 88.8 and 66.7% of participants achieved a 2-point improvement in demoralization at treatment end and follow-up, respectively. Fifty percent and 33.3% of them more than halved their baseline demoralization scores at treatment end and follow-up, respectively. An interpretive phenomenological analysis conducted by the same authors (Agin-Liebes et al., 2021) suggested that patients felt freed from their avoidant tendencies, able to access and process painful and self-transcendent feelings. They also reported an increase in prosocial attitudes and positive emotion along improvements in meaning-making and post-traumatic growth.

In summary, psychedelic-assisted SEGT integrated the psychedelic preparation in the preliminary session normally devoted to psychoeducation on group therapy. The treatment includes 1 psilocybin session and a subsequent integrative session. SEGT emphasizes the importance of tackling specific topics common to HIV-infected patients in group through direct confrontation with themes, emotions and practical issues in an atmosphere of openness and acceptance.

Our search identified 7 papers about the efficacy of psychedelic-assisted CBT. These regarded tobacco dependence (4 papers, open-label study: Garcia-Romeu et al., 2014; Johnson et al., 2014, 2017; Noorani et al., 2018), opioid dependence (1 paper, case study: Ocker et al., 2020) and TRD (2 papers, 1 RCT: Wilkinson et al., 2021); 1 open label study: (Wilkinson et al., 2017). CBT in conjunction with psilocybin has been used to support opioid tapering (Ocker et al., 2020) and, in the form of the Quit For Life programme (QFL) (Marks, 1993), to treat tobacco addiction (Garcia-Romeu et al., 2014; Johnson et al., 2017). Furthermore, it has been employed with ketamine to treat TRD (Wilkinson et al., 2017).

QFL is a self-help CBT-model designed to achieve smoking cessation in 7–10 days and provides patients with tools to prevent relapse (Marks, 1993). The program frames smoking as a “psychological addiction,” asserts that quitting can be achieved with a moderate amount of willpower, poses emphasis in increasing patients' self-efficacy and offers 30 different CBT-based approaches to reach such a goal. QFL is administered in the form of a handbook, cards, charts and audio recordings containing a summary of the material, relaxation music and suggestions to promote abstinence. Once a date for actual cessation is set, the first phase of the treatment begins: reduction. At this stage, patients are encouraged to reduce smoking by 50% everyday and are expected to reach abstinence 1 week later. Relapse prevention is the second phase of the program and makes use of several techniques such as mental imagery, suggestion, meditation and relaxation while teaching how to deal with other smokers. The program was initially tested in a two-year follow-up study (Sykes and Marks, 2001; Marks and Sykes, 2002) and authors reported that about 28% of individuals achieved abstinence or significant reductions in the QFL group while only about 6% did in the control group. The difference between groups was statistically significant.

In an open-label pilot study recruiting 15 nicotine-dependent smokers, Johnson et al. (2014) tested the effects of a 15-week treatment program which integrated QFL with psilocybin sessions (2014). To this aim, they structured a model in which participants first established a target quit date (TQD) 5 weeks from the beginning of treatment and then received 4 weekly QFL inspired sessions. Each session also conveyed information about psilocybin, contained a 10-min relaxation exercise along with the smelling of a scented oil and a guided imagery exercise, two elements drawn from another manualized smoking cessation intervention (Zernig et al., 2008). The first psilocybin session took place in week 5, employed an oral 20 mg/70 kg dose and coincided with the TQD. Following the first administration, participants went on with the weekly QFL program and took part in a second 30 mg/70 kg psilocybin session at week 7. Participants who still had not quit by that time, were offered a third psilocybin session at week 13 (30 mg/70 kg, unless the participants themselves wished to lower it) while weekly QFL sessions went on until week 15. During all psilocybin sessions participants were asked to state a previously elaborated motivational statement for smoking cessation. They lay on a couch while listening to music through headphones, received support from the research staff and were involved in a guided imagery exercise during the final phases of the session when the effects of psilocybin were subsiding. Finally, they were asked to write down a description of their experience to be used for discussion in an integration session that was held the following day.

In summary, psychedelic-assisted CBT for smoking cessation proposes 4 QFL/preparation sessions which included relaxation, guided imagery and smelling scented oil, 2 or 3 drug sessions held by at least one staff member and 1 integration session per each drug session. At the 6-month follow up, the authors reported significant reductions in daily smoking compared to baseline and that 80% (12 out of 15) of participants showed 7-day point prevalence abstinence. At 12 and ≥16-months post-treatment, 67% (10 of 15) and 60% (9 of 15) were confirmed abstinent, respectively (Johnson et al., 2017). Subsequent qualitative analysis of participants' accounts revealed that they experienced insights concerning their reasons for smoking, increased feelings of interconnectedness, awe and curiosity and long-term positive changes in pro-social behavior and aesthetic appreciation (Noorani et al., 2018). Abstainers scored higher on measures of psilocybin-occasioned mystical experiences (Garcia-Romeu et al., 2014).

Ketamine plus CBT for opioid tapering was used in a recent case-study in which a 55-year-old male patient suffering from complex regional pain syndrome treated with opioids for 12 years achieved abstinence after a 5-day ketamine infusion program while continuing a psychotherapy initiated 3 years prior (Ocker et al., 2020). Infusion began at 0.09 mg/kg/h and was titrated twice daily in 0.09 mg/kg/h increments. On the last day the patient had the dose halved in the morning and then discontinued in the afternoon.

Another ketamine plus CBT intervention was used in a study aiming at extending the stability of the antidepressant effect of the substance (Wilkinson et al., 2017, 2021). To this aim, the authors recruited 48 TRD patients and treated them with 6 intravenous infusions of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg over 40 min) during the course of 3 weeks. The 28 (58%) participants who showed an improvement >50% in depression scores were classified as responders and randomly assigned to two groups: 14 weeks of CBT or treatment as usual (TAU; regular visits with physician). The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms scores showed more sustained improvement in the CBT group compared to TAU while the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores did not reveal effects.

The CBT used in this study was based on Beck's model and comprised psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring and behavioral activation. The model included no preparation sessions and no formal integration sessions. Once the infusion cycle was completed, patients were referred to certified CBT therapists.

Our search identified 3 papers on an observational study testing the efficacy of psychedelic-assisted CBCT in the treatment of couples in which one member suffered from PTSD (Wagner et al., 2019, 2021; Monson et al., 2020). CBCT (Monson and Fredman, 2012) is a treatment model for PTSD which, instead of focusing on patients alone, recruits their intimate partners in an attempt to improve treatment outcomes. In this context, PTSD is conceptualized as an interpersonal disorder given (a) the evidence showing that symptom severity correlates with intimate relationship adjustment and aggression (Taft et al., 2011); (b) that the construction of meaning after the traumatic experience is an interpersonal process (Monson et al., 2010); and (c) that the functioning of the relationship itself and of the intimate partner influences PTSD severity (Bradley et al., 2005; Lambert et al., 2012; Shnaider et al., 2014). CBCT promotes the development of new skills in the dyad as a whole and considers the relationship itself the actual client of the treatment (Monson and Fredman, 2012).

The efficacy of CBCT was tested in military samples in both controlled and uncontrolled studies (Liebman et al., 2020). This 15-session program comprises three phases synthesized by the acronym R.E.S.U.M.E. Phase 1 (Rationale and Education) provides psychoeducation concerning PTSD and its relational consequences and aims at building a climate of physical and emotional safety through behavioral strategies intended to increase positive affect and behaviors. Phase 2 (Satisfaction Enhancement and Undermining Avoidance) focuses on teaching and training communication skills and treating emotional numbing and behavioral avoidance. The goal is to promote the approaching of feared situations and increasingly engage the dyad in enjoyable activities. Finally, in phase 3 (Meaning Making and End of Therapy) the goal shifts to trauma related appraisals and its consequent current cognitions. The aim is to weaken factors that consolidate PTSD symptoms and relational problems. A recent review shows that CBCT leads to significant improvements in PTSD symptoms, comorbid conditions and relational satisfaction in both clinician and patient ratings (Liebman et al., 2020).

CBCT was recently used in an uncontrolled trial aimed at testing its effectiveness in six couples with the inclusion of two 6-h MDMA sessions (Monson et al., 2020) conducted in accordance with the guidelines specified in an earlier work (Wagner et al., 2019). The first two sessions of the treatment covered the R and E sections and were held on day 1. The next day participants would go through two more sessions covering part of the S and U sections. During the same day they would take part in the first dosing session (75 mg MDMA; 90 min after administration, patients could decide whether they wished to take an optional supplemental half-dose). The rationale was that by that time the couple would have already developed the necessary skills to effectively communicate during the session and share their experience. The first MDMA session was followed by an integration session on day 3 and over the subsequent 3 weeks participants would complete the S and U sections. The second MDMA session (100 mg plus an optional 50 mg) would then be held on day 23, to take advantage of the increased focus on trauma processing that the S and U sections entail. The program then proceeded with an integration session and the completion of modules M and E. All MDMA sessions took place in a room where participants could lie on a reclining chair. They listened to music through headphones, wore eyeshades and were encouraged to “spend time inside.” Results showed significant and sustained improvements in clinician-assessed PTSD with almost all participants achieving remission at the 6-month follow up. Five patients out of 6 showed remission at post-treatment follow-up (1 and 6 months). Depression, emotion regulation, trauma-related beliefs along with patient and partner satisfaction also improved. Subsequent analyses revealed improvements in post-traumatic growth measures, relational support, social intimacy as well as greater wellbeing within the couple, improved psychosocial functioning and empathic concern (Wagner et al., 2021).

In summary, psychedelic-assisted CBCT relies on a structured treatment model, does not include formal preparation sessions and places 2 drug sessions once certain communication skills are sufficiently developed. The drug sessions involve both partners and are followed by an integration session each.

Our search identified 1 paper testing the efficacy of combining a large dose of LSD with a Human Relations Training Laboratory (HRTL) group intervention in treating individuals suffering from AUD (Bowen et al., 1970). HRTL (Blake and Mouton, 1964) is a group training intervention built from the assumption that AUD patients struggle in dealing with everyday problems because of a lack of relational skills. The program therefore focuses on lectures on how to “increase effectiveness in groups” (Bowen et al., 1970), structured exercises and a rating system designed to assess progress. Patients were not attending any form of psychotherapy. The study (Bowen et al., 1970) described two experiments. In the first one a group of inpatients was assigned to a single LSD (500 μg, n = 41) session plus HRTL while a second one went through the HRTL program alone (n = 40). In the second experiment an additional group was included which went through a single LSD session (25 μg, n = ~22) plus HRTL. In this second experiment the 500 μg group comprised 22 patients and the HRTL only group 15. The LSD session took place during the first 3 weeks of the program in a room furnished informally with “potentially symbolic articles such as a flower, pictures and a two-sided mirror” where music chosen by the participant could be played. The session was preceded by “several group lectures to prepare patients” (Bowen et al., 1970) and during this preparation facilitators aimed at establishing positive expectations toward both the psychedelic experience and the clinical outcomes (Bowen et al., 1970). Patients were also encouraged toward relaxing and “going along” with the experience and were discouraged toward trying to control it (Bowen et al., 1970). LSD sessions were held by nursing assistants who were instructed to give close attention to patients, provide “positive suggestions” regarding their “ability to gain from the experience” (Bowen et al., 1970). Results showed no significant differences between any of the groups (Bowen et al., 1970).

Our search identified 1 RCT investigating the potential of MDMA-ATM in the treatment of social anxiety in adult autistic individuals (Danforth et al., 2018). The treatment program followed a protocol published a couple of years earlier (Danforth et al., 2016).

The rationale for the treatment was built on the basis of (a) research mostly from the ‘60s and ‘70s indicating potential for clinical improvement (b) a better understanding of the importance of set and setting in ensuring the safety of patients (c) the copious anecdotal reports of MDMA-induced improvements in empathy, ease of communication, comfort in social settings, feelings of ease in one's own body reported in online fora (for a review see Danforth et al., 2016) and (d) evidence showing that practicing mindfulness skills has beneficial effects in social, emotional and cognitive areas of functioning of autistic individuals (Bögels et al., 2008; Spek et al., 2013). Concerning this latter point, the authors adapted the mindfulness skills training module from Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), an already established model of psychotherapy (Linehan, 2018).

The model is structured in three phases as seen in other approaches. More specifically, before the first MDMA session, participants take part in three 60–90-min preparatory sessions (Danforth et al., 2018) aimed at building rapport, clarifying treatment structure, expected effect of the substance, at discussing relevant issues expressed by participants and practicing mindfulness. Furthermore, the training aims at providing patients with an enriched vocabulary useful to describe the psychedelic experience. Once the preparation phase is complete and before taking the MDMA, patients are involved in a guided progressive muscle relaxation exercise (McCallie et al., 2006) in a room furnished to facilitate feelings of comfort. Patients are then accompanied through the experience by two co-therapists (one male and one female) for the whole duration of the session. During its course, a variety of tasks are proposed including artistic activities, listening to music, writing, introspection and therapist interaction. Therapists should create and maintain a supportive and safe setting and discuss social challenges that patients may have. The MDMA session is followed by 4 non-drug sessions (after 1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 6 months, respectively) during which details concerning the experience are gathered and discussed to facilitate the integration of the experience in everyday life (Danforth et al., 2018). A subsequent MDMA session with corresponding integration sessions then follows. Subsequently, patients are be involved in daily telephone check-ins. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study, 12 patients were assigned either to a MDMA-ATM (n = 8) or to a placebo plus mindfulness skills training group (n = 4). Both conditions comprised 3 preparatory sessions, 2 drug sessions (75 mg MDMA for the first session and 100 mg MDMA for the second or 2 inactive placebo) and 3 integration sessions after each drug session. The MDMA-ATM led to significantly greater improvements in social anxiety scores at the 6-month follow up and response rates (MDMA = 75%; control = 50%) (Danforth et al., 2018).

In summary, this model proposes 3 preparation/mindfulness training sessions, 2 MDMA sessions held by 2 therapists (1 female and 1 male) each preceded by a relaxation exercise and followed by 4 integration sessions. The psychotherapeutic method is adapted from the DBT mindfulness module, an already established model (Linehan, 2018).

Our search identified 5 papers on 2 separate studies investigating the efficacy of psychedelic-assisted MET in the treatment of AUD: 1 pilot RCT (Dakwar et al., 2020; Rothberg et al., 2021) and 1 open-label study (Bogenschutz et al., 2015, 2018; Nielson et al., 2018).

MET is a brief treatment model devised to achieve change in problem drinkers and individuals suffering from other addictive disorders (Miller, 1994). MET is based on the principles of motivational interviewing (Miller and Rollnick, 1991) and on the transtheoretical model of change (Prochaska, 1992) which conceptualizes the process of changing maladaptive behavioral patterns as a cycle comprising 6 stages, i.e., precontemplation, contemplation, determination, action, maintenance, and relapse, each requiring specific therapeutic actions (Prochaska and DiClemente, 1985, 1994). It begins with an initial structured assessment, resolves in 4 sessions held in a 90-day window and considers the mobilization of the clients' own resources as the primary mechanism for effective therapy. This model rests on earlier literature indicating that effective treatments for problem drinkers share some common principles (Orford, 1986): they provide feedback of personal risk or impairment, emphasize personal responsibility, give clear advice, provide alternative options for change, value an empathic attitude on the part of the therapist (as opposed to a more confrontational one) and promote clients' self-efficacy (Prochaska and DiClemente, 1985, 1994).

During precontemplation individuals are not considering change and are usually uninterested in initiating treatment. In contemplation, they begin to consider the problematic aspects of their behaviors and the costs/benefits of change. If correctly facilitated by the therapist, patients will reach the determination stage in which a firm stand to take action is established. Once patients begin to modify the problem behavior, they are considered to have reached the action stage. Should the new behavior pattern persist, after 3–6 months patients are considered to have reached the maintenance stage. Relapse is considered another stage of this cycle and, should patients experience such slips, they will be accompanied through the cycle again. During the first treatment session (Miller, 1994), patients receive feedback from the initial assessment phase which addresses addictive behaviors, symptoms, decisional considerations, and future plans. The second session takes place a week after the first one and is dedicated to build or strengthen patient motivation. The subsequent two sessions, held 4 and 10 weeks after the second one, focus on monitoring and encouraging change and its maintenance. Therapists are required to adopt 5 motivational principles in conducting sessions: express empathy, develop discrepancy, avoid argumentation, roll with resistance, support self-efficacy. More specifically, therapists should aim at building an empathic and collaborative relationship. In this frame, patients are considered the only ones who can decide to change and therapists as supportive consultants who listen rather than tell and build up rather than tear down. Since motivation is conceptualized as the result of increasing discrepancy between the current and desired state, therapists should help to develop such discrepancy in order to increase the chances of opening a discussion on change options. Argumentation is firmly discouraged in order to avoid the strengthening of defensive coping strategies. Additionally, the focus is on the consequences of addictive behaviors (as opposed to diagnostic aspects) and on leading clients themselves to be the ones voicing the arguments for change. Since ambivalence is viewed as a normal part of the treatment of addictive behaviors, therapists are encouraged to “roll with” resistance. Finally, the belief that clients can change their addictive behavior is crucial for therapeutic success, therefore therapists should directly adopt strategies to build and consolidate self-efficacy (Bandura, 1982).

MET was used in conjunction with psilocybin to treat AUD in a proof-of-concept study that recruited 10 patients (Bogenschutz et al., 2015). The intervention model spanned over the course of 12 weeks and employed a total of 7 MET sessions, 3 preparation sessions, 2 psilocybin sessions, and 2 debriefing sessions. More specifically, screened patients were involved in 2 preparation and 2 MET sessions followed by the first psilocybin session (0.3 mg/kg, p.o.). Subsequently, patients took part in a debriefing session, 2 more MET sessions and in another preparation session before proceeding to the second dosing session. In this case the proposed dose was 0.4 mg/kg unless the participant was unwilling to increase it, experienced adverse effects during the first one or already achieved a complete mystical experience. In these cases the employed dose would have been equal to that of the first session. The treatment course ended after another debriefing session and 3 more MET sessions. Psilocybin sessions took place in a living room-like space where patients were asked to lie down on a couch while listening to music through headphones and wearing eyeshades. Results showed that drinking and heavy drinking days decreased across weeks 5–12 compared to both baseline and 4-week since treatment initiation. Improvements were maintained at the 36-week follow-up. No data on response/remission rates was provided. Qualitative analysis of patient accounts of psilocybin sessions (Bogenschutz et al., 2018) revealed themes related to mystical experiences, feelings of forgiveness, self-compassion, acceptance and love as well as experiences of catharsis, increased mindfulness and “spaciousness.” According to the authors, the emerged material was personally meaningful to the individuals and tended to frame drinking behaviors in a wider psychodynamic perspective.

In another recent randomized, active-placebo controlled trial that compared the efficacy of a single ketamine hydrochloride (2-min 0.11-mg/kg bolus in saline followed by a 50-min slow-drip intravenous infusion of 0.6 mg/kg) or midazolam (a 2-min saline bolus followed by a 50-min slow-drip intravenous infusion of midazolam, 0.025 mg/kg) administration session combined with psychotherapy to treat AUD (Dakwar et al., 2020), MET was adapted as follows. During the course of 5 weeks, patients were involved in a course of weekly sessions. The initial session aimed at defining goals and elaborating a motivational statement related to quitting drinking. During the following week, they took part in an infusion session and in an additional MET session. The other sessions were scheduled for the following 3 weeks. Results showed better outcomes in the ketamine group in terms of drinking days, heavy drinking days, proportion of abstinent participants, at the 21 days post-infusion time point. Telephone interviews with a subset of the complete sample (n = 19) suggested greater rates of abstinence in the ketamine group (75%) compared to the control group (27%) at the 6 months follow-up. Additional analyses showed that the occurrence of mystical-type experiences seemed to play a role in mediating treatment efficacy (Rothberg et al., 2021).

In summary, the first adaptation (psilocybin) saw preparation and integration (debriefing) sessions interspersed in the course of a MET program with 1 preparation session and 1 debriefing session before and after each drug session. One extra preparation session was carried out at the beginning of treatment. The second adaptation (ketamine) used no formal preparation but included an MET motivational and goal-setting session before the infusion. Subsequently, 4 more MET sessions were administered.