Front. Psychol. Frontiers in Psychology Front. Psychol. 1664-1078 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752308 Psychology Correction Corrigendum: The Influence of Unconscious Perceptual Processing on Decision-Making: A New Perspective From Cognitive Neuroscience Applied to Generation Z Sutil-Martín Dolores Lucía 1 * Rienda-Gómez Juan José 2 1Department of Business Economics, Rey Juan Carlos University, Móstoles, Spain 2Department of Financial Economics and Accounting and Modern Language, Rey Juan Carlos University, Móstoles, Spain

Edited and reviewed by: Luis Mañas-Viniegra, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain

 *Correspondence: Dolores Lucía Sutil-Martín doloreslucia.sutil@urjc.es

This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

 02 09 2021 2021 12 752308 02 08 2021 11 08 2021 Copyright © 2021 Sutil-Martín and Rienda-Gómez. 2021 Sutil-Martín and Rienda-Gómez

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on The Influence of Unconscious Perceptual Processing on Decision-Making: A New Perspective From Cognitive Neuroscience Applied to Generation Z by Sutil-Martín, D. L., and Rienda-Gómez, J. J. (2020). Front. Psychol. 11:1728. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01728 cognitive neuroscience unconscious perceptual processing backward visual masking generation Z neuroticism extroversion introversion logistic regression

In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 6: Difference of proportions: Male_Female as published. There are two different typographical errors. The right value of the sample proportion for Male_Female_C is 0.939394, and the sample size is 33. The corrected Table 6: Difference of proportions: Male_Female appears below.

Difference of proportions: Male_Female.

Variable N Sample proportion
Male_Female_C 33 0.939494
Male_Female 308 0.594156
Difference = p(Male_Female_C)-p
(Male_Female)
Estimate for difference 0.345238
95% CI for difference (0.247080, 0.443396)
Test for difference = 0 (vs. not = 0): Z = 6.89 P-Value = 0.000***
Fisher's exact test: P-value 0.000***

Sig. Codes:

0.001.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.