<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<?covid-19-tdm?>
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Psychol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Psychology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Psychol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-1078</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736522</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Psychology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Technology Integration in Higher Education During COVID-19: An Assessment of Online Teaching Competencies Through Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Model</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Akram</surname>
<given-names>Huma</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1395191/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yingxiu</surname>
<given-names>Yang</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Al-Adwan</surname>
<given-names>Ahmad Samed</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c002" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alkhalifah</surname>
<given-names>Ali</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Education, Northeast Normal University</institution>, <addr-line>Changchun</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Electronic Business and Commerce, Al-Ahliyya Amman University</institution>, <addr-line>Amman</addr-line>, <country>Jordan</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department of Information Technology, Qassim University</institution>, <addr-line>Buraidah</addr-line>, <country>Saudi Arabia</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn1" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Adrian Castro-Lopez, University of Oviedo, Spain</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn2" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Sahibzada Nasir Mansoor,Combined Military Hospital Pano Aqil, Pakistan; Delf&#x00ED;n Ortega-S&#x00E1;nchez, University of Burgos, Spain; Keerti Singh, The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill, Barbados</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Huma Akr, <email>xium087@nenu.edu.cn</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c002">Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan, <email>a.adwan@ammanu.edu.jo</email></corresp>
<fn id="fn3" fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>26</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>736522</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>05</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>27</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2021 Akram, Yingxiu, Al-Adwan and Alkhalifah.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Akram, Yingxiu, Al-Adwan and Alkhalifah</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic significantly shifted education from traditional to an online version, which was an emergent state for teachers and students. The substantive situation thus raises the importance of technology integration in education, and teachers are required to update their competencies, respectively. In this regard, the study assessed online teaching competencies of faculty members following, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) model. Closed-ended surveys were employed for quantitative analysis of randomly selected 256 faculty members from public universities in Karachi, Pakistan. Results indicated that teachers possessed adequate levels of knowledge across all the domains of TPACK. The highest competency was obtained by content knowledge (CK), while technological knowledge (TK) was reported at the lowest level. Furthermore, a significant difference was noted in terms of gender and teaching experience. Correspondingly, the study proposes that the TPACK model should be employed in the professional development programs to develop teachers&#x2019; TPACK for integrating information communication and technology in the pedagogical practices. The findings of the study present a constructive overview of teachers&#x2019; digital competencies and technology use in teaching and learning in the time of the COVID-19 and also play a significant role in the integration of technology in the post-pandemic time in higher education. The study also suggests relevant educational authorities and policymakers for assessing and enhancing the technological competencies of teachers for quality online education.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>technology integration</kwd>
<kwd>online teaching practices</kwd>
<kwd>higher institutions</kwd>
<kwd>technological pedagogical content knowledge</kwd>
<kwd>COVID-19</kwd>
<kwd>teaching experience</kwd>
<kwd>gender difference</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="9"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="74"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="7695"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>As it can be seen worldwide, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused a significant interruption in all the domains of human lives. Likewise, the educational sector also encountered many challenges by the institutional closure from schools to universities, and traditional education shifted to the online paradigm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">UN, 2020</xref>). The scenario of this technological transition affected the education of about half of the student population globally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">UNESCO, 2020</xref>). Thereby, the situation raises the importance of technology integration in education, and teachers are required to update their competencies to endow quality education and make changes to their curriculum and instruction accordingly. Regarding the application of information communication and technology (ICT) in education, however, instructors and learners are familiar with the traditional technological teaching aids, such as Smartboards and PowerPoint; still, their practical employability is required in the teaching practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Nikolopoulou and Gialamas, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Guill&#x00E9;n-G&#x00E1;mez et al., 2018</xref>). Besides, this provisional period raised the necessity, especially for the teachers, to gain competency in applying ICT in their teaching practices. Meanwhile, the application of ICT in higher education has remained a major subject of concern for decades at the global level (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">US Department of Education, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Daniela et al., 2018</xref>). Many studies have highlighted that the application of ICT in the classroom setting has become a critical factor for meeting the needs of the learner in the knowledge society (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Martins et al., 2019</xref>). Besides, the successful integration of ICT can make the learning process more exciting and keep learners motivated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Hanafi et al., 2017</xref>), which are considered as the significant predictors of their academic performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">Xu et al., 2021</xref>). In the same manner, the utilization of ICT is suggested by the government of Pakistan to optimize the educational outcomes, as it helps to enhance the pedagogical competencies of teachers and boost learners to learn actively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Pakistan Ministry of Education (MoE), 2018</xref>].</p>
<p>Moreover, the effective integration of ICT is essential in systematizing an efficient online educational program. The successful application of ICT not only contributes to learners&#x2019; satisfaction but also helps individuals to acquire their desired outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Cervero et al., 2020</xref>). It is, therefore, essential to develop competencies in teachers to use ICT effectively in their pedagogical practices by organizing professional development programs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Guill&#x00E9;n-G&#x00E1;mez et al., 2020</xref>). However, teachers&#x2019; professional training for the efficient use of ICT in teaching did not apply because of the sudden pandemic situation and put students at risk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Guill&#x00E9;n-G&#x00E1;mez et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Hong et al., 2021</xref>). Consequently, it caused excessive pressure on teachers to achieve students&#x2019; required educational attainment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Rodriguez-Segura et al., 2020</xref>). Although teachers made every effort to continue students&#x2019; learning, yet they had to encounter several challenges in adopting digital platforms for teaching, which include insufficient inter-institutional coordination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Talsma et al., 2021</xref>), little understanding, and investment in advanced technologies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Akram et al., 2021</xref>). In the past decade, however, in Pakistan, online learning has also been handled significantly, still been endured with the various constraints that prevent the effective integration of ICT in educational practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kanwal and Rehman, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Salam et al., 2017</xref>). Earlier studies indicate that students generally show better academic performance in digital platforms comparing with the traditional ones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Shehzadi et al., 2020</xref>). On the other hand, the digital competencies of teachers are found inadequate, particularly in the formulation of lesson plans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Farid et al., 2015</xref>). However, most of the teachers are digitally literate and can conduct online lessons, yet they are found incapable of integrating ICT efficiently in their teaching practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Al-Samarraie and Saeed, 2018</xref>). Consequently, their digital instructional approaches may remain unsuccessful in delivering the content effectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Adnan and Anwar, 2020</xref>). In this regard, the situation raises the importance of teachers&#x2019; professional learning to acquire technological competency, as a successful pedagogical practice would mainly be possible if teachers possess a sound technological competency. The relationship between technological competency with educational content was considered necessary by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Mishra and Koehler (2006)</xref> and presented this in their framework, namely, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Their primary focus was derived on the basis of the premise that teachers are required to acquire technological competency to use it effectively in the instructional approaches. Regarding evaluation, several studies have presented instruments to evaluate the technological competencies of teachers differently, but their main focus remained on teachers&#x2019; knowledge, beliefs, and adaptation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Ertmer, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Aldunate and Nussbaum, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Kim et al., 2017</xref>). The complementary fact in various studies was that they comprised only one of the components of the concept.</p>
<p>In contrast, technological competency involves all the major components, such as knowledge (technological, pedagogical, and content), skills, and attitudes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Voogt et al., 2015</xref>), whereas limited literature and studies have been found regarding all the major components. In addition, the acquisition of TPACK depends on social, cultural, and contextual attributes, which may vary from one country to another. However, several studies have been investigated teachers&#x2019; digital competencies through all the determinants of TPACK in various countries (i.e., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Lin et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Scherer et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Ortega-S&#x00E1;nchez and G&#x00F3;mez-Trigueros, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Acikgul and Aslaner, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Cast&#x00E9;ra et al., 2020</xref>). But, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that aims to examine teachers&#x2019; digital competencies <italic>via</italic> all the mentioned sub-components of TPACK during the pandemic phase, specifically in the context of higher education in Pakistan. In this regard, the present study examines the integration of ICT in faculty members&#x2019; pedagogical practices by unfolding their technological competencies level. Subsequently, lecturers and professors from public universities of Karachi city of Pakistan were considered for a case study under the guidance of the following research questions:</p>
<list list-type="order">
<list-item>
<p>What are the levels of TPACK of faculty members across higher institutions of Karachi?</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Is there any significant difference between faculty members&#x2019; TPACK regarding their gender and teaching experience?</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2">
<title>Review of Literature</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Online Teaching Competencies</title>
<p>The term online teaching can be exemplified with the help of these principles: (1) The learner and teacher interconnected with each other distantly <italic>via</italic> different digital platforms, (2) learning and learning materials can be accessed through technology, (3) the interaction between teacher and learner takes place <italic>via</italic> technology, and (4) teacher assists learner with the help of different digital channels of communication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Anderson, 2011a</xref>). In a general manner, online teaching is viewed as similar to the teaching for all other formal learning/teaching environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Anderson, 2011b</xref>). On the other hand, teaching competency signifies the skills, attitudes, and knowledge of the teachers that enable them to perform in a way that meets or exceeds the expected standards successfully (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Richey et al., 2011</xref>). Without having adequate competencies, it is difficult for teachers to execute and organize online instructional programs efficiently as teaching is characterized by selecting a number of tactics for a specified discourse, which may involve lesson planning or instructional and learning materials. In this regard, the previous literature finds several categories and characteristics of online teaching competencies. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Thomas and Graham (2017)</xref> emphasize course design as the core component of teachers&#x2019; competencies. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Bigatel et al. (2012)</xref> focused on teaching behaviors and did not focus on instructional design. Contrarily, few researchers provide a brief description of teachers&#x2019; online competencies by means of personal, social, pedagogical, and technological characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Guasch et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Baran et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Palloff and Pratt, 2013</xref>). Other researchers propose a framework to demonstrate the features of teaching competencies. Among those, the widely used and renowned model is considered as the TPACK model, developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Mishra and Koehler (2006)</xref>. The present study employs the TPACK model to investigate online teaching competencies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Technology Integration in Pedagogical Practices</title>
<p>Several studies draw attention to the importance of technology integration in pedagogical practices and imply that it does not facilitate only students but also the teacher in the learning process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Salam et al., 2019</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Islam et al. (2019)</xref> indicate that the utilization of technology in teaching makes teacher competent in pedagogical as well as content areas in the classrooms and helps learners to learn efficiently by the use of technological tools. Several studies highlight the advantages of technology use for teachers. For instance, the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Vongkulluksn et al. (2018)</xref> highlights that the teachers prefer to spend more time teaching in the classrooms, who are good at utilizing technology. Furthermore, the technological competencies of teachers enable them to adapt other teaching strategies and approaches easily; as a result, their performance gets enhanced.</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Oliva-C&#x00F3;rdova et al. (2021)</xref> ascertain that the usage of technology in teaching practices enables learners to learn effortlessly; however, its efficient application generally depends upon teachers&#x2019; technological and pedagogical competencies. Various studies have identified the importance of these competencies and knowledge of teachers in teaching practices. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Ifinedo et al. (2020)</xref> indicate that teachers&#x2019; technological knowledge either explicitly or implicitly contributes significantly to integrating ICT successfully, while teachers&#x2019; ICT pedagogical practices have found the lowest technology integration predictor. The results further suggested including professional training to assist teachers in integrating ICT efficiently by enhancing their technological competencies. To investigate the impact of teachers&#x2019; training programs on their online teaching effectiveness, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Brinkley-Etzkorn (2018)</xref> conducted a survey. The findings revealed a significant change in teaching competencies and designing course syllabi in teachers, while no significant difference in teaching was observed according to their student perceptions.</p>
<p>Moreover, the knowledge of technology and expertise in the utilization of technology are considered two different modes of competencies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Instefjord and Munthe, 2017</xref>). For instance, it is identified by some studies that despite having technology literacy, teachers were not capable of using technology in teaching efficiently (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Din&#x00E7;er, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Alanazy and Alrusaiyes, 2021</xref>). It indicates that technological knowledge and using technology in pedagogical practices are two different concepts. Several studies and theories have been proposed to highlight this aspect. Briefly, it can be summarized that the effective use of technology in teaching practices is possible only if teachers are equipped with all the fundamental competencies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Ifinedo et al., 2020</xref>). Likewise, the TPACK model also ascertains that ICT cannot be integrated efficiently in educational practices until teachers do not possess all the essential technological skills (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Mishra and Koehler, 2006</xref>). This model is comprised of three main components of teachers&#x2019; knowledge or acquaintance (shown in <xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>), i.e., technological, pedagogical, and content. Although all three components of the model seem different and separate knowledge domains, interfaces and associations among these core concepts establish the central point of the overall framework (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Archambault and Barnett, 2010</xref>). After following the convergence of the mentioned components, knowledge of teachers can be classified as technological content knowledge (TCK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), and technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK), while the complete form of all components of knowledge is represented as TPACK (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Schmidt et al., 2009</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework (retrieved from <ext-link xlink:href="http://tpack.org" ext-link-type="uri">http://tpack.org</ext-link>).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-12-736522-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Teachers&#x2019; TPACK Concerning Their Gender and Teaching Experience</title>
<p>It is indicated by several empirical studies that teachers&#x2019; characteristics also play a significant role in integrating ICT, which may vary across the countries; for instance, some studies have identified a significant difference in gender with a more inclination of males toward digital instructional development than females (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Mar&#x00ED;n-D&#x00ED;az et al., 2020</xref>). In terms of TPACK, studies also indicate the gender difference; for instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Lin et al. (2013)</xref> identified higher pedagogical knowledge in female teachers with lower technological knowledge. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Scherer et al. (2017)</xref> revealed that in all technological domains of TPACK, male teachers reported significantly higher competencies than females. In contrast, the TCK of female teachers was reported higher than the male teachers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Ortega-S&#x00E1;nchez and G&#x00F3;mez-Trigueros, 2019</xref>). However, a study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Cast&#x00E9;ra et al. (2020)</xref> came across different results and found no significant difference between genders in terms of teachers&#x2019; TPACK.</p>
<p>Another element of central concern in the acquisition of digital competencies is the teaching experience of teachers. Regarding years of teaching experience, studies show mixed results. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Koh et al. (2014)</xref> identified a significant difference in ICT integration concerning the teaching experience and determined that TPACK of novice teachers was higher than experienced teachers. In contrast, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Jang and Tsai (2012)</xref> identified that senior teachers&#x2019; technological skills were higher than novice teachers. Therefore, the hypotheses of the study can be posited as:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p>H1: <italic>&#x201C;There is a significant difference between faculty members&#x2019; TPACK with respect to their gender.&#x201D;</italic></p>
</disp-quote>
<disp-quote>
<p>H2: <italic>&#x201C;There is a significant difference between faculty members&#x2019; TPACK with respect to their teaching experience.&#x201D;</italic></p>
</disp-quote>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6" sec-type="methods">
<title>Methodology</title>
<p>For examining faculty members&#x2019; TPACK, a quantitative survey design was employed as it was considered the most appropriate approach to gain accurate reflection <italic>via</italic> numerical representation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Watson, 2015</xref>). Subsequently, the study was guided by questionnaires, which were mailed and also emailed by the researcher to various universities.</p>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>Participants of the Study</title>
<p>The population of the study comprises all the faculty members from public universities of Karachi, which consists of 11 universities with estimated 785 faculty members [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Higher Education commission (HEC), 2015</xref>]. For ensuring a stable data analysis, the sample size was calculated by applying the Yamane Taro sample formula for a finite population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Israel, 1992</xref>) and obtained a sample size of 260 respondents. The sample size for conducting this study was appropriate, as the size of the sample between 30 and 500 at a 5% confidence level is identified as adequate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Altun&#x0131;&#x015F;&#x0131;k et al., 2004</xref>). Subsequently, the questionnaires were distributed to lecturers/professors who were selected randomly from different public universities in Karachi. After excluding questionnaires with incomplete information, 256 questionnaires were considered for the data analysis. The ages of the respondents ranged from 29 to 54years, encompassing 44.1% (<italic>n</italic>=113) were females and 55.8% (<italic>n</italic>=143) were male faculty members. Their further details are presented in <xref rid="tab1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Demographic statistics of the respondents.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Category</th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>N</italic></th>
<th align="left" valign="top">%</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="3"><bold>Gender</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Male</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">143</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">55.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Female</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">113</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">44.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="3"><bold>Departments</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Social sciences</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">99</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Natural sciences</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">95</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">37.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Arts and humanities</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">62</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="3"><bold>Age</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">20&#x2013;29</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">44</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">30&#x2013;39</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">126</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">49.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">40&#x2013;49</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">86</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="3"><bold>Teaching experience</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Up to 1year</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2&#x2013;5years</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">175</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">68.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x003E;6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">43</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16.7</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<title>Ethical Concerns</title>
<p>In order to ensure the reliability of the findings, the study followed all the ethical concerns to conduct the study. These concerns include the granted approval from the supervisor on account of the ethical committee. The other ethical concerns include assurance of the privacy and honor of the participants of the study, and questionnaires were filled after taking their consent.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>Survey Instrument</title>
<p>The instrument utilized in this study was adopted from the validated scale formulated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Schmidt et al. (2009)</xref>, which was devised on the basis of the TPACK theoretical framework to examine teachers&#x2019; competencies within three basic domains, i.e., pedagogies, technology, and content. The said questionnaire was intensively used by other researchers (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Scherer et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Ortega-S&#x00E1;nchez and G&#x00F3;mez-Trigueros, 2019</xref>). Before conducting data, the questionnaire was modified according to the study&#x2019;s approach; for instance, the questions from the domain (content knowledge) were rephrased from a specific subject to a general subject. Furthermore, the last three qualitative questions were also excluded from the survey. The modified form of the questionnaire comprised seven dimensions of 38 items, including (1) technological knowledge (TK) 7 items, (2) content knowledge (CK) 3 items, (3) pedagogical knowledge (PK) 7 items, (4) PCK 4 items, (5) TCK 4 items, (6) TPK 5 items, and (7) TPACK 8 items. The responses of each group&#x2019;s items were laid down upon a five-point Likert scale extending from &#x201C;Strongly Disagree&#x201D; to &#x201C;Strongly Agree.&#x201D;</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>Confirmation of the Model Fitness</title>
<p>In order to increase the reliability of the findings, it is imperative to align empirical data with the theoretical framework of the study. Thereby, the fitness of all the dimensions of the TPACK model was investigated through confirmatory factor analysis as shown in <xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>. The chi-square value was less than 5 (i.e., <italic>&#x03C7;</italic>2/<italic>df</italic>=4.1), which indicates the significant fitness of the model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Schermelleh-Engel et al., 2003</xref>). The other indicators were also reported significant (shown in <xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>), as their values were less than the threshold values, i.e., RMSEA&#x2264;0.06, CFI&#x2265;0.95, TLI&#x2265;0.95 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Hu and Bentler, 1999</xref>); SRMR&#x003C;0.05 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Cangur and Ercan, 2015</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Confirmation of the model fitness.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>&#x03C7;</italic>2</th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>df</italic></th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>p</italic></th>
<th align="left" valign="top">RMSEA</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">CFI</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">TLI</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">SRMR</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">1154.781</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">275.411</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.96</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.97</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.04</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>Reliability of the Instrument</title>
<p>The reliability of all the constructs of TPACK was investigated through Cronbach&#x2019;s alpha scale. The value of each construct was above 70% (shown in <xref rid="tab3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>), which shows satisfactory consistency, as the collected data are reviewed as reliable if the alpha value is more than 60% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Tavakol and Dennick, 2011</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Reliability evaluation.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Constructs of the questionnaire</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">No. of items</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Alpha value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Technological knowledge (TK)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">07</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.73</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Content knowledge (CK)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">03</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Pedagogical knowledge (PK)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">07</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">04</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.72</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Technological content knowledge (TCK)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">04</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">05</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">TPACK</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">08</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.75</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<title>Data Analysis</title>
<p>All the collected data were analyzed by employing various descriptive and inferential statistical tests, i.e., descriptive test (mean and standard deviation) and inferential test (<italic>T</italic>-test and ANOVA). Subsequently, the analysis was completed by applying the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which enabled the examination of the differences between subsamples with respect to their TPACK scores. The ROC curve is a two-dimensional graphical representation of the values of sensitivity vs. 1-specificity ranges from 0 to 1, which helps in determining the difference between different subgroups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Bradley, 1997</xref>).</p>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>Research Question 1</title>
<p>Technological pedagogical content knowledge of faculty members was investigated by means of descriptive statistical tests, i.e., mean and standard deviation, which are shown in <xref rid="tab4" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref>. Knowledge of all the domains of TPACK was rated above 3, which demonstrates that faculty members possess adequate knowledge as <italic>M</italic>&#x2265;3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Rabe-Hesketh and Everitt, 2003</xref>). Among all domains of TPACK, the highest mean value was obtained by the content knowledge (CK), i.e., 4.6, while technological knowledge (TK) obtained the least mean value.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Descriptive analysis of teachers&#x2019; TPACK.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Factors of TPACK</th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>M</italic></th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>SD</italic></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Technological knowledge (TK)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.81</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Pedagogical knowledge (PK)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.69</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Content knowledge (CK)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">PCK</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">TCK</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">TPK</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">TPACK</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.71</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<title>Research Question 2 (Hypotheses)</title>
<p>Before checking hypotheses, the normality test was conducted through Shapiro&#x2013;Wilk test to know whether the data meet the criteria of conducting a parametric test since it is considered the most prevailing test to investigate normality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Razali and Wah, 2011</xref>). Results showed that the data were normally distributed as S-W value was 0.83 and the significant value was greater than 0.5, i.e., 0.61, which allows parametric tests to be conducted. Subsequently, the posited hypotheses of the study were checked by employing inferential statistics, i.e., <italic>T</italic>-test and ANOVA, where <italic>T</italic>-test was employed to investigate the difference between faculty members&#x2019; TPACK with respect to their gender and ANOVA was applied to test the hypothesis regarding teaching experience of faculty members.</p>
<sec id="sec15">
<title>Hypothesis 1</title>
<p>All the components of TPACK were compared by applying the <italic>T</italic>-test (shown in <xref rid="tab5" ref-type="table">Table 5</xref>). Results revealed a significant statistical difference between male and female respondents (i.e., <italic>T</italic>=10.34; <italic>p</italic>=0.000) at alpha level 0.05. Therefore, the hypothesis regarding faculty members&#x2019; TPACK with respect to their gender was accepted. Furthermore, male faculty members got a significantly higher mean score (4.12) than the female teaching faculty (3.67), which shows that the TPACK of male faculty members was greater than the female ones.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p><italic>T</italic>-test analysis by gender of teachers.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Gender</th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>N</italic></th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Mean</th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>SD</italic></th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>df</italic></th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>T</italic></th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Sig</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Male</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">143</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.12</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.78</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">142</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.34</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Female</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">113</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.67</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.49</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>In addition, the gender difference with respect to TPACK scores was represented graphically through the ROC curve. The results shown in (<xref rid="tab6" ref-type="table">Table 6</xref>; <xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref>) showed high sensitivity and specificity with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.921 with a significant statistical difference, i.e., <italic>p</italic>=0.000 at alpha level 0.05.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption>
<p>ROC curve parameters (female gender).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">AUC<xref rid="tfn1" ref-type="table-fn"><sup>a</sup></xref></th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>CI</italic><xref rid="tfn2" ref-type="table-fn"><sup>b</sup></xref> 95%</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Standard error</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Sig</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.921</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.887&#x2013;0.956</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.017</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn1">
<label>a</label>
<p><italic>Area under curve</italic></p>
</fn>
<fn id="tfn2">
<label>b</label>
<p><italic>Confidence interval</italic></p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (gender).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-12-736522-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Furthermore, to investigate the most optimal predictors of teachers&#x2019; TPACK, the mean of all the sub-components was compared with respect to their gender (shown in <xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3</xref>). Results reveal that the TK of male faculty members was significantly greater than the female ones. However, the CK was found significantly higher in female faculty members than the male ones.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Distribution of components of TPACK by gender.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-12-736522-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<title>Hypothesis 2</title>
<p>For examining the distinction between faculty members&#x2019; TPACK with regard to their teaching experience, the mean of TPACK was compared with the teaching experience of all the faculty members by applying the ANOVA test (shown in <xref rid="tab7" ref-type="table">Table 7</xref>). Results reveal a significant difference between faculty members&#x2019; teaching experiences with their TPACK. Therefore, the hypothesis regarding the teaching experiences of faculty members was accepted, which further demonstrates that the TPACK of teachers with experience of 2&#x2013;5years is higher than the novice and inexperienced teachers.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab7">
<label>Table 7</label>
<caption>
<p>ANOVA by teaching experience of teachers.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Academic interests</th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>N</italic></th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Mean</th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>SD</italic></th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>F</italic></th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Sig</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Up to 1year</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.28</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.32</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.47<xref rid="tfn3" ref-type="table-fn"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2&#x2013;5years</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">175</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.49</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.31</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x003E;6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">43</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.40</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.28</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn3">
<label>&#x002A;&#x002A;</label>
<p><italic>p</italic>&#x003C;0.05</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In order to find out the further differences across all possible pairs of the faculty members&#x2019; teaching experiences, Tukey&#x2019;s honestly significant difference <italic>post-hoc</italic> test was conducted. Since Tukey&#x2019;s HSD test helps to compare the means of all the possible pairs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Abdi and Williams, 2010</xref>). Results from Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post-hoc</italic> test (<xref rid="tab8" ref-type="table">Table 8</xref>) demonstrate that only one out of three groups had a significant difference among each other, i.e., teaching experiences up to 1year vs. 2&#x2013;5years.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab8">
<label>Table 8</label>
<caption>
<p><italic>Post-hoc</italic> test.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Test</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Sig</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Up to 1year vs. 2&#x2013;5years</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Up to 1year vs. &#x003E;6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">2&#x2013;5years vs. &#x003E;6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.446</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>In addition, the difference in teaching experience with respect to TPACK scores was represented graphically through the ROC curve. The results shown in (<xref rid="tab9" ref-type="table">Table 9</xref>; <xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4</xref>) illustrated high sensitivity and specificity with an AUC of 0.716 with a significant statistical difference, i.e., <italic>p</italic>=0.000 at alpha level 0.05.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab9">
<label>Table 9</label>
<caption>
<p>ROC curve parameters (teaching experience).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">AUC<xref rid="tfn4" ref-type="table-fn"><sup>a</sup></xref></th>
<th align="left" valign="top"><italic>CI</italic><xref rid="tfn5" ref-type="table-fn"><sup>b</sup></xref> 95%</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Standard error</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Sig</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.716</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.655&#x2013;0.777</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.031</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn4">
<label>a</label>
<p>Area under curve</p>
</fn>
<fn id="tfn5">
<label>b</label>
<p>Confidence interval</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>ROC curve (teaching experience).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-12-736522-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17" sec-type="discussions">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>COVID-19 outbreak has transformed the traditional educational practices and brought teaching-learning around digital format across the world. This transformation not merely raises the importance of the educational technology infrastructure of the country but also establishes a prerequisite for teachers to integrate technology in their pedagogical practices effectively to sustain students&#x2019; learning. Since the systematic implementation of ICT in teaching practices is remained at an early stage and a limited focus has been given at the higher education level. In this regard, the current study gives a deep insight to understand the levels of core competencies of faculty members&#x2019; TPACK with the role of personal variables (i.e., gender and teaching experience) in the acquisition of digital competencies during the COVID-19 period.</p>
<p>In view of the obtained findings, the study reveals that faculty members possess adequate knowledge in all the sub-components of the TPACK model, which shows that teachers have sufficient knowledge and skills regarding technology use in their pedagogical practices. This finding shows consistency with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Mouza et al. (2014)</xref>, where participants experienced a significant gain in all sub-components of TPACK. Hence, our results indicate that TPACK is an excellent framework to examine teachers&#x2019; competencies in the context of universities&#x2019; teachers of Pakistan.</p>
<p>The results further indicate that the highest competence of faculty members among all other domains was obtained by the content knowledge (CK), which shows that faculty members seem more confident in their content knowledge than other domains of expertise. A similar finding is also identified by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Acikgul and Aslaner (2020)</xref>; accordingly, teachers&#x2019; content knowledge was found adequate. In contrast, the study conducted by illustrated that teachers were confident primarily in the pedagogical knowledge (PK). It is therefore imperative to draw attention toward teachers&#x2019; content knowledge through continuous monitoring and by offering in-service workshops to sustain the students&#x2019; learning outcomes, as it helps learners to understand concerning concepts significantly.</p>
<p>Technological knowledge involves operating particular technologies, which plays a crucial role in integrating technology in the process of teaching and learning (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Chai et al., 2010</xref>). Besides, successful e-learning can only be yielded when teachers can use technology in their pedagogical practices appropriately. On the other hand, the technological knowledge (TK) of faculty members was found at the lowest level among all other domains, which indicates that teachers lack technological competence. Thus, they require professional guidance to update their technological skills. The findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Schmid et al. (2021)</xref> also indicated that teachers&#x2019; technological and TCK emerged as the least acquired competencies. Therefore, to enhance the technological literacy in teachers, ICT training centers with ICT professionals should be originated at the national and provincial levels.</p>
<p>The knowledge regarding the interaction between all domains of TPACK plays a significant role in the development of an innovative learning environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Ortega-S&#x00E1;nchez and G&#x00F3;mez-Trigueros, 2019</xref>). However, the other reported lowest competence of faculty members was found in the domain of TPACK. This finding reflects the finding of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Lye (2013)</xref>, who indicated that teachers possess low TPACK, and they need improvement in several areas of TPACK. In light of this result, teachers should be given a range of guidance in terms of all the domains of TPACK and the interaction between those domains by providing both initial and ongoing support to implement the technologies in their pedagogical practices successfully.</p>
<p>This study further found that male teachers&#x2019; TPACK was significantly higher than female faculty members. This finding reflects the finding of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Koh et al. (2010)</xref>, where male teachers showed more positive attitudes, competencies, and knowledge with respect to technology use. This result indicates that female faculty requires more support to gain their competencies in all the sub-components of TPACK. Regarding teaching experience, it is usually expected that teachers&#x2019; knowledge increases with the increase in years of experience. In contrast, the results showed a statistical significance in the TPACK of faculty members&#x2019; knowledge, where faculty members with experience of 2&#x2013;5years shown higher TPACK than the teachers with more experience and novice teachers. This finding supports the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Claro et al. (2018)</xref>, where years of teaching experience were found significantly associated with the TPACK of teachers. Based on the personal factors, policymakers and teachers should be aware of gender differences&#x2019; effect on technological knowledge and competencies; therefore, gender differences should be monitored closely by conducting longitudinal TPACK studies. There should be an equal emphasis on training programs on pre-service as well as in-service teachers so that teachers of all levels may learn effectively to integrate technology into their educational practices.</p>
<p>In addition, the study suggests that the new technological instructional context in the COVID-19 phase appeared as an important moderator for teachers in upgrading their competencies in terms of TPACK. Regarding the contextual environment, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Mishra (2019)</xref> indicates that the addition of contextual knowledge (XK) may reveal the situational and institutional limitations that teachers work within. During the COVID-19 pandemic, teachers and learners experienced their practices in multiple new and unfamiliar contexts, which impacted teachers&#x2019; abilities to teach successfully remotely in the digital environment. Therefore, future studies should examine teachers&#x2019; XK comprehensively to determine the influence of different contextual factors on teachers&#x2019; TPACK with a focus on facilitating teachers with contextual change.</p>
<p>Finally, remote work and online learning are teaching conditions that will continue to advance steadily. In turn, the post-COVID-19 reactivation and recovery processes do not seem to contemplate that the teaching and learning processes as before. Therefore, future research should be aimed not only at understanding human behavior while studying or teaching virtually but also at understanding the TPACK model and building better ways to integrate technology into educational practices. In this regard, the findings of the study are highly significant, not particularly in determining the technology integration during the COVID-19 pandemic phase, which is currently the most crucial issue, but also for the integration of technology in the post-pandemic time in higher education.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Based on the obtained results, the study affirms that the COVID-19 pandemic phase significantly influenced the digital competencies of faculty members and reveals adequate knowledge in all the sub-components of the TPACK, with a significant difference in terms of gender and teaching experience. Regarding consistency, the TPACK model was verified by means of factorial analyses in terms of seven sub-components and in the context of higher education faculty members in Pakistan, which supports the value and appropriateness of the model. Accordingly, the study suggests that the TPACK model should be employed in the professional development programs to develop teachers&#x2019; TPACK for integrating technology efficiently by bridging the gap between ICT knowledge and ICT practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<title>Implications and Limitations</title>
<p>The findings of this study contribute to society in several ways. Regarding theoretically, this study has enriched the literature on the technological competencies of teachers during the COVID-19 transitory period and verified the reliability of the TPACK model in the context of Karachi, Pakistan. It can be further used for verification in other cities and countries. In terms of methodological contribution, the study provides tentative insight in evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 transitory period on teachers&#x2019; digital competencies and their state of implementation in pedagogical practices. Regarding academics, this study provides a pragmatic direction to relevant educational authorities and policymakers for the improvement of online education by providing pertinent solutions and recommendations as per the situation. In addition, the future planning of professional development and training programs for the teachers can be based on the feedback provided by the faculty members. The study can further contribute to elevating e-learning outcomes and satisfaction during as well as post-pandemic phase.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the study also noted some limitations. Firstly, faculty&#x2019;s response biasness may have affected the results since digital competencies were assessed self-reported quantitatively. Therefore, the future studies may select other approaches to unfold the understanding of teachers and establish the criteria for evaluating the TPACK of teachers. Secondly, the current study only focused on the TPACK model to assess the digital competencies of faculty. The findings of this study can be further strengthened in the future by employing other indicators to examine the teachers&#x2019; competencies in teaching with technology.</p>
<p>Finally, the analysis was cross-sectional and evaluated the teaching practices of university teachers during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online technological, pedagogical, and content competencies of teachers may change over time, which should also be observed. Therefore, a longitudinal study should be conducted to strengthen the evidence by understanding the causal effects and interrelationships among various other variables, critical in elevating the online pedagogical practices at the higher level in Pakistan.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<title>Ethics Statement</title>
<p>Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>HA is the principal investigator of the study. From conceptualization to the data analysis, she conducted by herself. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec001" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abdi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Tukey&#x2019;s honestly significant difference (HSD) test</article-title>. in <source>Encyclopedia of Research Design.</source> ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name></person-group>. <publisher-loc>Thousand Oaks, CA</publisher-loc>, <publisher-name>Sage</publisher-name> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Acikgul</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aslaner</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effects of Geogebra supported micro teaching applications and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) game practices on the TPACK levels of prospective teachers</article-title>. <source>Educ. Inf. Technol.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>2023</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2047</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10639-019-10044-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adnan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anwar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: students&#x2019; perspectives</article-title>. <source>J. Peda. Soc. Psych.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33902/JPSP.202020261309</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Akram</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aslam</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saleem</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parveen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The challenges of online teaching in COVID-19 pandemic: a case study of public universities in Karachi, Pakistan</article-title>. <source>J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>263</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>282</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.28945/4784</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alanazy</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alrusaiyes</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Saudi pre-service special education teachers&#x2019; knowledge and perceptions toward using computer technology</article-title>. <source>Int. Educ. Stud.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>125</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>137</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5539/ies.v14n3p125</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aldunate</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nussbaum</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Teacher adoption of technology</article-title>. <source>Comp. Human Behav.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>519</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>524</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.017</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al-Samarraie</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saeed</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>A systematic review of cloud computing tools for collaborative learning: opportunities and challenges to the blended-learning environment</article-title>. <source>Comp. Educ.</source> <volume>124</volume>, <fpage>77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>91</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.016</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Altun&#x0131;&#x015F;&#x0131;k</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Co&#x015F;kun</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bayraktaro&#x011F;lu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Y&#x0131;ld&#x0131;r&#x0131;m</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <source>Research Methods in Social Sciences.</source> <edition>3rd</edition> <italic>Edn</italic>. <publisher-loc>Istanbul</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Sakarya Bookstore</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011a</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Towards a theory of online learning</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source>Theory and Practice of Online Learning.</source> ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> <edition>2nd</edition> <italic>Edn</italic>. (<publisher-loc>Edmonton</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Athabasca University Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011b</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Teaching in an online learning context</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source>Theory and Practice of Online Learning.</source> ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> <edition>2nd</edition> <italic>Edn</italic>. (<publisher-loc>Edmonton</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Athabasca University Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>366</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Archambault</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barnett</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: exploring the TPACK framework</article-title>. <source>Comp. Educ.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>1656</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1662</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baran</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Correia</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Transforming online teaching practice: critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers</article-title>. <source>Dist. Edu.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>421</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>439</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01587919.2011.610293</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bigatel</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ragan</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kennan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>May</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Redmond</surname> <given-names>B. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The identification of competencies for online teaching success</article-title>. <source>J. Asyn. Learn. Net.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bradley</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms</article-title>. <source>Patt. Recog.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1159</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0031-3203(96)00142-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brinkley-Etzkorn</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Learning to teach online: measuring the influence of faculty development training on teaching effectiveness through a TPACK lens</article-title>. <source>Int. High. Educ.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>28</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cangur</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ercan</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Comparison of model fit indices used in structural equation modeling under multivariate normality</article-title>. <source>J. Mod. Appl. Stat. Methods</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>14</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22237/jmasm/1430453580</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cast&#x00E9;ra</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marre</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yok</surname> <given-names>M. C. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sherab</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Impedovo</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sarapuu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Self-reported TPACK of teacher educators across six countries in Asia and Europe</article-title>. <source>Educ. Inf. Technol.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>3003</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3019</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10639-020-10106-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cervero</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Castro-Lopez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>AlvarezBlanco</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Esteban</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernardo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of educational quality performance on virtual campuses using fuzzy inference systems</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>e0232802</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0232802</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koh</surname> <given-names>J. H. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>C.-C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Facilitating preservice teachers&#x2019; development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK)</article-title>. <source>Educ. Technol. Soci.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>63</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Claro</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salinas</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cabello-Hutt</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>San Mart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Preiss</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Valenzuela</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Teaching in a digital environment (TIDE): defining and measuring teachers&#x2019; capacity to develop students&#x2019; digital information and communication skills</article-title>. <source>Comp. Educ.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <fpage>162</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Daniela</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Visvizi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guti&#x00E9;rrez-Braojos</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lytras</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Sustainable higher education and technology-enhanced learning (TEL)</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>3883</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su10113883</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Din&#x00E7;er</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Are pre-service teachers really literate enough to integrate technology in their classroom practice? Determining the technology literacy level of pre-service teachers</article-title>. <source>Educ. Inf. Technol.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>2699</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2718</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10639-018-9737-z</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ertmer</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration?</article-title> <source>Educ. Technol. Res. Dev.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02504683</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farid</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niaz</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arif</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shamshirband</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khattak</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Identification and prioritization of critical issues for the promotion of e-learning in Pakistan</article-title>. <source>Comp. Hum. Behav.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>161</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>171</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.037</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guasch</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alvarez</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Espasa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>University teacher competencies in a virtual teaching/learning environment: analysis of a teacher training experience</article-title>. <source>Teach. Teach. Educ.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>199</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.018</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guill&#x00E9;n-G&#x00E1;mez</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mayorga-Fern&#x00E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x00C1;lvarez-Garc&#x00ED;a</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>A study on the actual use of digital competence in the practicum of education degree</article-title>. <source>Technol. Knowl. Learn.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>667</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>684</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10758-018-9390-z</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guill&#x00E9;n-G&#x00E1;mez</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mayorga-Fern&#x00E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bravo-Agapito</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Escribano-Ortiz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Analysis of teachers&#x2019; pedagogical digital competence: identification of factors predicting their acquisition</article-title>. <source>Technol. Knowl. Learn.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>491</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>498</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10758-019-09432-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hanafi</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Said</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wahab</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Samsuddin</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Improving students&#x2019; motivation in learning ICT course with the use of a mobile augmented reality learning environment</article-title>. <source>IOP. Con. Series Mater. Sci. Engi.</source> <volume>226</volume>:<fpage>012114</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1757-899X/226/1/012114</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">Higher Education commission (HEC)</collab></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Pakistan</article-title>. Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.hec.gov.pk/english/universities/Pages/AJK/University-wise-Full-time-faculty.aspx" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.hec.gov.pk/english/universities/Pages/AJK/University-wise-Full-time-faculty.aspx</ext-link> (Accessed March 12, 2021).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Preschool teachers&#x2019; technology acceptance During the COVID-19: An adapted technology acceptance model</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>691492</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2021.691492</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>L. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bentler</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives</article-title>. <source>Struc. Equa. Model. Multi. J.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10705519909540118</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ifinedo</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rikala</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>H&#x00E4;m&#x00E4;l&#x00E4;inen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Factors affecting Nigerian teacher educators&#x2019; technology integration: considering characteristics, knowledge constructs, ICT practices and beliefs</article-title>. <source>Comp. Educ.</source> <volume>146</volume>:<fpage>103760</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103760</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Instefjord</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munthe</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Educating digitally competent teachers: a study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education</article-title>. <source>Teach. Teach. Educ.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Islam</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mok</surname> <given-names>M. M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spector</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hai-Leng</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>ICT in higher education: an exploration of practices in Malaysian universities</article-title>. <source>IEEE Access</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>16892</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16908</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895879</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Israel</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <source>Sampling the Evidence of Extension Program Impact.</source> <publisher-loc>Gainesville, FL</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University of Florida</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jang</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards</article-title>. <source>Comp. Educ.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>327</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>338</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kanwal</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rehman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Factors affecting e-learning adoption in developing countries&#x2013;empirical evidence from Pakistan&#x2019;s higher education sector</article-title>. <source>IEEE Access</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>10968</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10978</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2714379</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Building teacher competency for digital content evaluation</article-title>. <source>Teach. Teacher Edu.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>309</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>324</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Koh</surname> <given-names>J. H. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre-service teachers with a large-scale survey</article-title>. <source>J. Comput. Assist. Learn.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>563</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>573</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00372.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Koh</surname> <given-names>J. H. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Demographic factors, TPACK constructs, and teachers&#x2019; perceptions of constructivist-oriented TPACK</article-title>. <source>J. Educ. Technol. Soc.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>196</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>T. -C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>C. -C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>C. -S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>M. -H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Identifying science teachers&#x2019; perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK)</article-title>. <source>J. Sci. Educ. Technol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>325</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>336</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10956-012-9396-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lye</surname> <given-names>L. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Opportunities and challenges faced by private higher education institution using the TPACK model in Malaysia</article-title>. <source>Procedia. Soci. Behav. Sci.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>294</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>305</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.426</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mar&#x00ED;n-D&#x00ED;az</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Riquelme</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cabero-Almenara</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Uses of ICT tools from the perspective of chilean university teachers</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>6134</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su12156134</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martins</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Branco</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gon&#x00E7;alves</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Au-Yong-Oliveira</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naranjo-Zolotov</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Assessing the success behind the use of education management information systems in higher education</article-title>. <source>Tele. Inform.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>182</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>193</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mishra</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Considering contextual knowledge: the TPACK diagram gets an upgrade</article-title>. <source>J. Dig. Learn. Teach. Educ.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>76</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>78</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mishra</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koehler</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a new framework for teacher knowledge</article-title>. <source>Teach. Coll. Rec.</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>1017</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1054</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mouza</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karchmer-Klein</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nandakumar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ozden</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Investigating the impact of an integrated approach to the development of pre-service teachers&#x2019; technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)</article-title>. <source>Comp. Educ.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>206</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>221</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.020</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nikolopoulou</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gialamas</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Barriers to ICT use in high schools: Greek teachers&#x2019; perceptions</article-title>. <source>J. Comp. Educ.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>75</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s40692-015-0052-z</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oliva-C&#x00F3;rdova</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garcia-Cabot</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amado-Salvatierra</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Learning analytics to support teaching skills: a systematic literature review</article-title>. <source>IEEE Access</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>58351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58363</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070294</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ortega-S&#x00E1;nchez</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x00F3;mez-Trigueros</surname> <given-names>I. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>MOOCs and NOOCs in the training of future geography and history teachers: a comparative cross-sectional study based on the TPACK model</article-title>. <source>IEEE Access</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>4035</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4042</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2963314</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll2">Pakistan Ministry of Education (MoE)</collab></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <source>National Education Policy 2018.</source> <publisher-loc>Islamabad</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Government of Pakistan</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Palloff</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pratt</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <source>Lessons From the Virtual Classroom: The Realities of Online Teaching.</source> <publisher-loc>san francisco, CA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>John Wiley &#x0026; Sons</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rabe-Hesketh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Everitt</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <source>Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using Stata.</source> <publisher-loc>London, New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CRC Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Razali</surname> <given-names>N. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wah</surname> <given-names>Y. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and Anderson-darling tests</article-title>. <source>J. stat. mod. Ana.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Richey</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tracey</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <source>The Instructional Design Knowledge Base: Theory, Research, and Practice.</source> <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Routledge</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rodriguez-Segura</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zamora-Antu&#x00F1;ano</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodr&#x00ED;guez-Res&#x00E9;ndiz</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paredes-Garc&#x00ED;a</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Altamirano-Corro</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cruz-P&#x00E9;rez</surname> <given-names>M. &#x00C1;.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Teaching challenges in COVID-19 scenery: teams platform-based student satisfaction approach</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>7514</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su12187514</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Salam</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iskandar</surname> <given-names>D. N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ibrahim</surname> <given-names>D. H. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farooq</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Technology integration in service-learning pedagogy: a holistic framework</article-title>. <source>Tele. Inform.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>257</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>273</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tele.2019.02.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Salam</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jianqiu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pathan</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lei</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Strategic barriers in the effective integration of ICT in the public schools of Pakistan</article-title>. <source>In Proc. 2017 Int. Con. Comp. Sci. Arti. Intell.</source> <fpage>169</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>172</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1145/3168390.3168422</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scherer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tondeur</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Siddiq</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>On the quest for validity: testing the factor structure and measurement invariance of the technology-dimensions in the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) model</article-title>. <source>Comp. Educ.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scherer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tondeur</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Siddiq</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baran</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers&#x2019; technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: comparing structural equation modeling approaches</article-title>. <source>Comput. Hum. Behav.</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schermelleh-Engel</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moosbrugger</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00FC;ller</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures</article-title>. <source>Methods Psychol. Res. Online</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schmid</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brianza</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petko</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans</article-title>. <source>Comput. Hum. Behav.</source> <volume>115</volume>:<fpage>106586</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baran</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): the development and validation of an assessment instrument for pre-service teachers</article-title>. <source>J. Res. Technol. Educ.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>149</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shehzadi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nisar</surname> <given-names>Q. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hussain</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Basheer</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hameed</surname> <given-names>W. U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chaudhry</surname> <given-names>N. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The role of digital learning toward students&#x2019; satisfaction and university brand image at educational institutes of Pakistan: a post-effect of COVID-19</article-title>. <source>Asian Educ. Dev. Stud.</source> <volume>10(2)</volume>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/aeds-04-2020-0063</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Talsma</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Norris</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>COVID-19 beliefs, self-efficacy and academic performance in first-year university students: cohort comparison and mediation analysis</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>643408</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643408</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tavakol</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dennick</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Making sense of Cronbach&#x2019;s alpha</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Med. Educ.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28029643</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref67"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Graham</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Common practices for evaluating post-secondary online instructors</article-title>. <source>Onl. J. Dis. Lear. Admin.</source> <volume>20</volume>. Available at: https:// <ext-link xlink:href="http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/" ext-link-type="uri">www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/</ext-link> (Accessed July 31, 2021).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref68"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll3">U.S. Department of Education</collab></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Office of educational technology. Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 national education technology plan update. U.S. department of education</article-title>. Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf</ext-link> (Accessed January 11, 2017).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref69"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll4">UN</collab></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Education during COVID-19 and beyond</article-title>. Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/%202020/08/sg_policy_brief_covid-19_and_education_august_2020.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/ 2020/08/sg_policy_brief_covid-19_and_education_august_2020.pdf</ext-link> (Accessed February 24, 2021).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref70"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll5">UNESCO</collab></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>COVID-19 educational disruption and response</article-title>. Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-emergencies/coronavirus-school-closures" ext-link-type="uri">https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-emergencies/coronavirus-school-closures</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vongkulluksn</surname> <given-names>V. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bowman</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The role of value on teachers&#x2019; internalization of external barriers and externalization of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration</article-title>. <source>Comp. Educ.</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>70</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Voogt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fisser</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Good</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mishra</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Computational thinking in compulsory education: towards an agenda for research and practice</article-title>. <source>Educ. Inf. Technol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>715</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>728</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref74"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Watson</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Quantitative research</article-title>. <source>Nurs. Stand.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>44</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7748/ns.29.31.44.e8681</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25828021</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref75"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Student performance prediction based on blended learning</article-title>. <source>IEEE Trans. Educ.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>66</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/TE.2020.3008751</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>