<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Psychol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Psychology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Psychol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-1078</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00766</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Psychology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Resting-State fMRI Associated with Stop-Signal Task Performance in Healthy Middle-Aged and Elderly People</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>Hsing-Hao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/436437/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Hsieh</surname> <given-names>Shulan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/8485/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Psychology, National Cheng Kung University</institution> <country>Tainan, Taiwan</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Institue of Allied Health Sciences, National Cheng Kung University</institution> <country>Tainan, Taiwan</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department and Institute of Public Health, National Cheng Kung University</institution> <country>Tainan, Taiwan</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Sharna Jamadar, Monash University, Australia</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Suzanne T. Witt, Link&#x000F6;ping University, Sweden; Nicola Canessa, Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia (IUSS), Italy</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x0002A;Correspondence: Shulan Hsieh <email>psyhsl&#x00040;mail.ncku.edu.tw</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>12</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>8</volume>
<elocation-id>766</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>31</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>26</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2017 Lee and Hsieh.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Lee and Hsieh</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract><p>Several brain regions and connectivity networks may be altered as aging occurs. We are interested in investigating if resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI) can also be valid as an indicator of individual differences in association with inhibition performance among aged (including middle-aged) people. Seventy-two healthy adults (40&#x02013;77 years of age) were recruited. Their RS-fMRI images were acquired and analyzed via two cluster-analysis methods: local synchronization of spontaneous brain activity measured by regional homogeneity (ReHo) and fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) of blood oxygenation level-dependent signals. After the RS-fMRI acquisition, participants were instructed to perform a stop-signal task, in which the stop signal reaction time (SSRT) was calculated based on the horse-race model. Among participants, the ReHo/fALFF and SSRT were correlated with and without partialling-out the effect of age. The results of this study showed that, although aging may alter brain networks, the spontaneous activity of the age-related brain networks can still serve as an effective indicator of individual differences in association with inhibitory performance in healthy middle-aged and elderly people. This is the first study to use both ReHo and fALFF on the same dataset for conjunction analyses showing the relationship between stopping performance and RS-fMRI in the elderly population. The relationship may have practical clinical applications. Based on the overall results, the current study demonstrated that the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus and parts of the default mode network activation were negatively correlated with SSRT, suggesting that they have crucial roles in inhibitory function. However, the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and SMA played only a small role during the resting state in association with stopping performance.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>cluster-analysis</kwd>
<kwd>ReHo</kwd>
<kwd>fALFF</kwd>
<kwd>stop-signal</kwd>
<kwd>age</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Ministry of Science and Technology of the People&#x00027;s Republic of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100002855</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="8"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="64"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="8639"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Stopping behavior is an important function for an individual in daily activities, such as stopping driving upon seeing an unexpected pedestrian cross the road. Thus, decreasing the adaptive stopping ability may cause severe danger. It has been shown that when people get older, they are more susceptible to distraction (distractibility hypothesis of aging; see Healey et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2008</xref> for a review) and disinhibition (inhibition deficit hypothesis of aging; e.g., Hasher and Zacks, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">1988</xref>; Dempster, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">1992</xref>; Hasher et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">1999</xref>; Gazzaley and D&#x00027;Esposto, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2007</xref>), resulting in more response intrusions and/or interference from irrelevant stimuli. However, other research indicates that not all older adults are affected by disinhibition, and there might be exceptions either because of individual differences in their brain activity or performance strategies (Hsieh and Fang, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2012</xref>; Hsieh and Lin, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2014</xref>; Hsieh et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2016</xref>). Therefore, research investigating if older adults have generic deficits in inhibition, which to some extent depends upon individual differences in brain activity, is still warranted. In this study we used resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI) in the elderly population. Our main goal was to assess the validity of this resting-state approach, in order to provide a reliable brain-measurement of inhibition in a population for which extensive task-related fMRI testing may not be suitable.</p>
<p>RS-fMRI is a well-known and promising tool to study the relationship between spontaneous brain activity and behavioral performance. Understanding these relationships may have practical clinical applications, especially to infer how well an individual will perform a task if their on-task brain activity is somehow difficult to acquire. Thus, recent studies have investigated the relationship between RS-fMRI and task performance using various cognitive control tasks, including the N-back working memory test (Evers et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2012</xref>; Sala-Llonch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2012</xref>), Stroop task (Evers et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2012</xref>; Takeuchi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">2015</xref>), Eriksen flanker task (Mennes et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2013</xref>), and California verbal learning test (Ystad et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">2010</xref>). In addition, RS-fMRI has also been shown to be correlated to stopping ability (Tian et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2012</xref>; Hu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2014</xref>), which is of main interest in this study. However, these two previous studies were either focused mainly on healthy young adults or biased to sample more healthy young adults across a life-span database, and thus, the association of RS-fMRI with stopping behavior in the middle-aged and elderly is unclear. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to address this knowledge gap.</p>
<p>Several analytical methods for measuring RS-fMRI have been developed since Biswal et al.&#x00027;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">1995</xref>) pioneering work (for a review, see Zuo and Xing, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2014</xref>). These analytical methods can be broadly classified into two categories: one for depicting functional connectivity (FC) between remote brain regions, and one for local FC. The spatial scale for differentiating local FC and remote FC is usually between 10 and 15 mm (e.g., 14 mm used in Sepulcre et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2010</xref>). The widely used methods in the latter category (local FC) include regional homogeneity (ReHo; Zang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2004</xref>), and the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF or fractional ALFF [fALFF]) (Zou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2008</xref>). The common rationale for ReHo and f/ALFF methods is that the identification of similar local features of the spontaneous BOLD signal among neighboring voxels within small clusters provides an account of regional functional connectivity. Therefore, ReHo and f/ALFF may be equally useful for exploratory or clinical research because they involve data-driven analyses of the entire brain (whole-brain approach), requiring no <italic>a priori</italic> selection of brain regions of interest (ROIs), which is required for other RS-fMRI methods such as the seed-based approach (Biswal et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">1997</xref>; Cordes et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2000</xref>; Jiang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2004</xref>). However, ReHo and f/ALFF differ in terms of their clustering algorithms (i.e., definition of similarity), as follows: ReHo measures the <italic><bold>temporal</bold></italic> synchronization by calculating Kendall&#x00027;s coefficient of concordance (Kendall and Gibbons, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">1990</xref>) for the time series of a given cluster of neighboring voxels (time-domain analysis), whereas f/ALFF measures the correlation of <italic><bold>amplitude</bold></italic>/fractional amplitude of spontaneous low-frequency (0.01&#x02013;0.1 Hz) voxel fluctuations (frequency-domain analysis). Some studies showed strong coupling relationships between ALFF and fALFF (Zou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2008</xref>; Zuo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2010</xref>), and strong positive correlations between ReHo and ALFF, which suggests that high spontaneous enhanced activity in a given voxel is accompanied by increased synchronization of the surrounding voxels and enhanced amplitude fluctuations of the resting-state blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signals (Yuan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2013</xref>; see also Nugent et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2015</xref>). However, some studies suggested that f/ALFF may be complementary to ReHo, thus suggesting that researchers apply both ReHo and f/ALFF methods to explore which method is more sensitive to local abnormalities and the extent to which they can detect different abnormalities in clinical populations (An et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2013</xref>; see also Han et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2011</xref>; Lei et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2012</xref>; Cui et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2014</xref>; Premi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2014</xref>). Ni et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2016</xref>) further advocated the advantage of applying these two complementary methods in a study by commenting that: &#x0201C;These two methods are based on different neurophysiology mechanisms&#x02026;Since the two methods found some changes in common cerebral functional regions, both were adopted to reduce inaccuracies and to provide reliable and comprehensive conclusions&#x0201D; (Ni et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2016</xref>, p. 1,251).</p>
<p>The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between stopping performance and spontaneous brain activity in the elderly population, and to assess the feasibility of this approach for future use with older adults for whom extensive task-based fMRI testing may not be suitable. As the brain ages, several brain regions and connectivity networks could be altered in terms of dynamics and location, decreasing the accuracy of ROI- and seed-based analyses. For example, Tomasi and Volkow (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2012</xref>) reported that aging was associated with pronounced decreases in long-range functional connectivity density in the default mode network (DMN) and dorsal attention network (DAN), and that it was also associated with increases in somatosensory and subcortical networks. Evers et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2012</xref>) further observed that age-related decreases in functional connectivity in DMN begin in middle-age. Moreover, some aging studies have also shown that the local and remote FC may be modulated by aging with a bias from the remote to local FC in the aged population (Tomasi and Volkow, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2012</xref>). Under these circumstances, whole-brain data-driven methods such as ReHo and f/ALFF provide a more reliable approach. These two methods provide different, but complementary neurophysiological measures of regional FC (i.e., time vs. frequency domains). In accordance with the view presented in Ni et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2016</xref>), here we focus mainly on the overlap between ReHo and fALFF, by means of a conservative conjunction analysis, allowing more reliable and comprehensive conclusions regarding regional FC.</p>
<p>The task used in this study to examine stopping ability is the stop-signal paradigm introduced by Logan and Cowan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">1984</xref>). In behavioral studies, older adults have often been shown to exhibit longer stopping time, suggesting that there is an age-related inhibitory deficit (e.g., Kramer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">1994</xref>; Bedard et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2002</xref>; van de Laar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2011</xref>; Kleerekooper et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2016</xref>). However, other studies found either no age-related decline (e.g., Kray et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2009</xref>) or only a specific deficit (e.g., Anguera and Gazzaley, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2012</xref>). This suggests that aging <italic>per se</italic> may not be the only factor that modulates the inhibitory process. There could be individual differences such as individual brain functions that modulate the inhibitory process. Therefore, in this study, we are particularly interested in investigating whether RS-fMRI is correlated with stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), dependent or independent of aging.</p>
<p>Previous research of <italic><bold>on-task</bold></italic> fMRI has shown that the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC) and (pre-)supplementary motor area ([pre-]SMA) are important brain regions that are associated with successful response inhibition (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2006</xref>; Chevrier et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2007</xref>; Chao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2009</xref>; Hu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2014</xref>). Additional brain areas, such as the superior frontal gyrus (SFG), medial frontal gyrus (medial FG), middle temporal gyrus (MTG), precuneus, and insula have also been reported to be involved in inhibition (Aron and Poldrack, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2006</xref>; Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2006</xref>; Ramautar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2006</xref>; Chevrier et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2007</xref>; Erika-Florence et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2014</xref>). However, RS-fMRI studies of response inhibition among healthy young adults have also shown that ReHo and SSRT correlate significantly in the rIFC (Tian et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2012</xref>), and that fALFF and SSRT correlate significantly in the pre-SMA/SMA (Hu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2014</xref>). As described above, when the brain ages, several brain regions and connectivity networks could be altered, and thus, we are interested in investigating if RS-fMRI is still a valid indicator of individual differences that are associated with inhibition performance among the elderly (including the middle-aged) population. Based on previous research, we expect that there will be a significant correlation between RS-fMRI and SSRT in the rIFC and/or pre-SMA/SMA if aging is not the only factor that modulates the inhibitory process.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="methods" id="s2">
<title>Methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Participants</title>
<p>The present study recruited 80 participants from southern Taiwan through advertisement on the internet and on bulletin boards. All participants provided written informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, R.O.C. All participants were paid 1,500 NTD after completion of the experiment. All participants were assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; Nasreddine et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2005</xref>) and the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II; Beck et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">1996</xref>), and participants with scores lower than 22 on the MoCA or higher than 13 on the BDI-II were excluded during the data analysis. The remaining 72 participants (mean age, 59.38 years, age range 40&#x02013;77 years, mean education, 13.72 years; 35 males) were all free from current psychological disorders and neurological disease, and they were all right-handed (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Participant demography and clinical characteristics</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mean</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Range</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SE</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40&#x02013;77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Education</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4&#x02013;18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MoCA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22&#x02013;30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BDI-II</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0&#x02013;13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.49</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>SE, standard error; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory II</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap></sec>
<sec>
<title>Behavioral task: stop-signal task</title>
<p>Participants were seated in a sound-attenuated room, 90 cm away from a computer monitor that presented stimuli. They were instructed to look at the stimulus shown on the monitor&#x00027;s screen, and press the &#x0201C;z&#x0201D; or &#x0201C;/&#x0201D; button corresponding to the target &#x0201C;O&#x0201D; or &#x0201C;X&#x0201D; with their left and right index finger respectively. The screen&#x00027;s background was white and the target stimulus was black. The target stimulus &#x0201C;O&#x0201D; or &#x0201C;X&#x0201D; was presented in the center of the screen lasting for 100 ms (it was 2 cm in size and at a visual angle of 0.64&#x000B0;). An auditory stop signal was presented that had a duration of 300 ms and a frequency of 500 Hz. In the formal experiment, there were 40 stop-trials along with 100 go-trials per block. The stop-signal delay (SSD) varied depending on the participants&#x00027; response to the stop-trials, and the SSD for each stop-trial was selected from one of two interleaved staircases, each starting with SSD values of 150 and 350 ms. If participants stopped successfully, the SSD would increase 50 ms in the next stop-trial, otherwise there was a decrease of 50 ms in the next stop-trial if they failed to stop (SSD range, 0&#x02013;800 ms). The staircase procedure ensured that subject&#x00027;s likelihood of stopping converged to 50% chance. The inter-stimulus interval (ISI) varied from 1,300 to 4,800 ms, and the SSRT was calculated by subtracted the median SSD from the median RT of the go trials (Band et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2003</xref>).</p>
<p>There were two practice blocks before the formal experiment started. In the first practice block, participants were instructed to perform a choice reaction-time task. Participants were instructed to respond to the stimulus as soon and as accurately as possible. There was a &#x0201C;beep&#x0201D; sound in the background and participants were asked to ignore this sound. In the second block of practice, participants were instructed to stop their reaction immediately when they heard the stop signal of a &#x0201C;beep&#x0201D; sound following the stimulus onset. They were told not to slow down their reaction to wait for the stop signal to occur. After the practice, the formal experiment commenced, and all of the settings and rules were the same as for the second practice block. The formal experiment included five blocks (140 trials per block, and 40 of them were stop-trials). The completion time was approximately 30 min, including instruction and practice time.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>fMRI acquisition and processing</title>
<p>MRI images were acquired using a GE MR750 3T scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) in the Mind Research Imaging (MRI) center at the National Cheng Kung University. High-resolution structural images were acquired using fast-SPGR, consisting 166 axial slices (TR/TE/flip angle, 7.6 ms/3.3 ms/12&#x000B0;; field of view (FOV), 22.4 &#x000D7; 22.4 cm<sup>2</sup>; matrices, 224 &#x000D7; 224; slice thickness, 1 mm), and the entire process lasted for 218 s. The resting-state functional images were collected using a gradient-echo planar imaging (EPI) pulse sequence (TR/TE/flip angle, 2,000 ms/30 ms/77&#x000B0;; matrices, 64 &#x000D7; 64; FOV, 22 &#x000D7; 22 cm<sup>2</sup>; slice thickness, 4 mm; voxel size, 3.4375 &#x000D7; 3.4375 &#x000D7; 4 mm). These slices covered the whole brain of each participant, and the scan time was 490 sec ((number of samples &#x0002B; number of dummy scan) &#x000D7; TR &#x0003D; (240&#x0002B;5) &#x000D7; 2 &#x0003D; 490 s) per subject. During the resting-state functional scans, the participants were instructed to remain awake with their eyes open and fixate on the white cross shown on the screen.</p>
<sec>
<title>Image analysis: preprocessing</title>
<p>The imaging data were preprocessed through SPM8 in MATLAB (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Functional images underwent slice timing, realignment, and coregistration. In the realignment, the time series of the scan was aligned to the first image of the session to correct the head motion. T1 images were then co-registered to participant&#x00027;s own EPI images and normalized (Bonding Box: &#x02212;100, &#x02212;130, &#x02212;80; 100, 100, 110) to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) standard space that was defined by a template T1-weighted image and resliced using a voxel size of 2 &#x000D7; 2 &#x000D7; 2 mm<sup>3</sup> to agree with the gray matter probability maps, and spatial smoothing was performed with a 6-mm full-width at half-maximum Gaussian kernel. Finally, every voxel was band-pass filtered (0.01&#x02013;0.08 Hz) to reduce the noise of high and low frequency fluctuations.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Resting-state image analysis</title>
<p>A two-step analysis of the resting-state data was performed as follows: (1) the resting-state data underwent two different kinds of analysis: ReHo and fALFF; and (2) the results of ReHo and fALFF were then correlated with the behavioral data (i.e., SSRT; see below for details). In addition, the correlations between ReHo and SSRT, as well as between fALFF and SSRT also added age as a covariate to re-examine the correlations.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>ReHo</title>
<p>ReHo analysis was performed on a voxel-by-voxel basis by calculating Kendall&#x00027;s coefficient of concordance (KCC) (Kendall and Gibbons, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">1990</xref>) of the time series in a given cluster of the neighboring 27 voxels. ReHo analysis is based on the hypothesis that significant brain activity would occur in a cluster rather than a single voxel. The ReHo value was assigned to the central voxel, which can represent the similarity of several time series (see Zang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2004</xref> for details).</p>
<sec>
<title>fALFF</title>
<p>The filtered resting-state data were transformed into the frequency domain using fast Fourier transform (FFT), and the power was calculated using the square root of the spectrum. Differing from the ALFF method, BOLD frequencies within 0.01&#x02013;0.08 Hz were divided by the entire frequency range (0.01&#x02013;0.25 Hz; unfiltered signals) at each voxel to obtain the fALFF value, which is less sensitive to physiological noise than the ALFF method (see Zou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2008</xref> for details).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Relationship between resting-state and behavioral performance: ReHo-SSRT and fALFF-SSRT correlations</title>
<p>The ReHo and SSRT correlation was calculated using the REST in-house function (Statistical Analysis, REST Correlation Analysis). The critical correlation value was set at 0.31 under the criteria of &#x003B1; &#x0003D; 0.005 (degrees of freedom, 70). We calculated the ReHo and SSRT correlation, as well as the ReHo and SSRT correlation partialled-out for the effect of age, using age as a covariate in the correlation analysis function in REST. We performed the same processes for the fALFF and SSRT correlation analysis. We inspected the significant areas using the REST Viewer. The cluster threshold was set at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005, which was corrected using AlphaSim. The AlphaSim correction is a method to provide a reasonable significance level while avoiding false-positive activation during analysis. This approach went through the iteration of random image generation, Gaussian filtering, scaling and thresholding, mask application, and cluster identification. It estimates the overall required significance level for multiple combinations of probability threshold and cluster size threshold (Ward, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2000</xref>). Other studies also used this correction approach to probe into aging and resting-state fMRI issues (e.g., Wu M. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2011</xref>; Wu J. T. et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2011</xref>).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Conjunction analysis of ReHo-SSRT and fALFF-SSRT correlation maps</title>
<p>We used the minimal <italic>t</italic>-statistic approach rationale (Nichols et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2005</xref>) to calculate the conjunction of ReHo-SSRT and fALFF-SSRT full-/partial-correlation maps. Instead of the minimal <italic>t</italic>-value used by Nichols&#x00027; research group, we used the maximum <italic>r</italic>-value as the conjunction calculation index because we were interested in the negative correlation between the resting-state brain network and SSRT. We created a new brain map that extracted the maximum of the negative r-value in each voxel of ReHo-SSRT or fALFF-SSRT full-/partial-correlation map, which were not corrected or thresholded. This map underwent AlphaSim correction again and the surviving significant areas indicated the overlap areas that were significantly correlated with SSRT under both ReHo and fALFF analyses. All the calculations were performed using the MATLAB in-house code.</p></sec></sec></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Behavior results</title>
<p>The behavioral performance of the go and stop (stop-success and stop-failure) trials in the stop-signal task is summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Behavioral data</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>RT (ms)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Choice Error (%)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Omission (%)</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Go trials</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">677.21 (17.05)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.07 (0.37)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.24 (1.39)</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>% of Inhibit</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>RT (ms)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>SSD (ms)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>SSRT (ms)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left">Stop-success trials</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.34 (1.41)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02014;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">352.96 (19.69)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">302.19 (20.50)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stop-failure trials</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02014;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">597.13 (15.10)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">386.70 (21.69)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02014;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>(standard error [SE] between parentheses): (1) Mean reaction time (RT), percentage of choice error (%) and omission (%) associated with go-trials; (2) mean percentage of inhibition (%), stop-signal delay (SSD; ms) and stop-signal RT (SSRT; ms) associated with stop-success trials; mean RT and stop-signal delay (SSD; ms) associated with stop-failure trials</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<sec>
<title>Go-trial performance</title>
<p>The mean accuracy of the correct go-trials was 86.69 &#x000B1; 1.58%, and the RT was 677.21 &#x000B1; 17.05 ms. The Pearson correlation between go-trials&#x00027; RT and age was not significant (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; 0.05, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003D; 0.66), and the correlation between go-trials&#x00027; accuracy and age was also not significant (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; &#x02212;0.10, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003D; 0.43).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Stop-trial performance</title>
<p>The stop inhibition rate (stop success rate) was 51.34 &#x000B1; 1.41%, which was close to the 50% aimed at by the staircase algorithm. The average SSRT was 302.19 &#x000B1; 20.50 ms. The correlation between SSRT and age did not reach significance (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; 0.22, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003D; 0.07; Cohen&#x00027;s <italic>d</italic> &#x0003D; 0.45), suggesting that stopping performance did not change significantly with age, at least in the age range of 40&#x02013;77 years. In addition, the correlation between SSRT and MoCA (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; &#x02212;0.19, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003D; 0.12), and that between SSRT and BDI (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; &#x02212;0.02, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003D; 0.90) did not reach significance. No significant correlation was found between the mean RT of the correct go-trials and the SSRT (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; &#x02212;0.04, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003D; 0.75), which is consistent with the horse-race model that assumes the independence of the process between go-trials and stop-trials.</p></sec></sec>
<sec>
<title>fMRI results</title>
<sec>
<title>ReHo and SSRT correlations</title>
<p>The ReHo was negatively correlated with SSRT in the bilateral cerebellum, bilateral superior frontal gyrus (SFG), medial frontal gyrus, bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), bilateral inferior temporal gyrus (ITG), bilateral fusiform gyrus (FG), parahippocampal gyrus (PHG), thalamus, lentiform nucleus, left putamen, right caudate, left insula, and pons (cluster <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005 corrected for AlphaSim). Because we recruited participants with a wide range of ages, we partialled-out the effect of age during the ReHo and SSRT correlation analyses to clarify if age plays a crucial role in the correlation. We found that the right SFG, left IFG, putamen and insula did not survive after the partialling-out process. The results are summarized in Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>, and in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Brain areas of regional homogeneity (ReHo) are negatively correlated with stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) across participants</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Region</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Cluster size(voxels)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Peak MNI coordinates</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>r</bold></italic></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>x</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>y</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>z</bold></italic></th>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right cerebellum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;90</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left cerebellum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right SFG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left SFG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Medial frontal gyrus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right IFG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left IFG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right ITG/Right FG/PHG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">157/149/44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left ITG/FG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">71/37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left ITG/Left FG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99/48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Thalamus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">151</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lentiform Nucleus/Left putamen</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30/28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right caudate</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left insula</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.47</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pons</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.46</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>SFG, superior frontal gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; FG, fusiform gyrus; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Brain areas of regional homogeneity (ReHo) are negatively correlated with stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) across participants, with age as a covariate</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Region</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Cluster size(voxels)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Peak MNI coordinates</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>r</bold></italic></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>x</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>y</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>z</bold></italic></th>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right cerebellum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left cerebellum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left SFG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Medial frontal gyrus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right IFG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right ITG/Right FG/PHG/Pons</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">200/187/67/26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left ITG/Left FG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">182/51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Thalamus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">173</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lentiform Nucleus/Putamen</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45/25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right caudate</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.47</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>SFG, superior frontal gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; FG, fusiform gyrus; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Brain areas of regional homogeneity (ReHo) are negatively correlated with stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) across participants; <bold>(B)</bold> with age as a covariate. Blue indicates negative correlations. The threshold was set at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005 under AlphaSim correction. The number below the images refer to the z coordinates (axial view), or x coordinates (sagittal view).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-08-00766-g0001.tif"/>
</fig></sec>
<sec>
<title>fALFF and SSRT correlations</title>
<p>The fALFF was negatively correlated with SSRT in the bilateral cerebellum, left SFG, right middle frontal gyrus, left IFG, right superior temporal gyrus (STG), right MTG, bilateral ITG, left superior parietal lobule (SPL), right inferior parietal lobule (IPL), right post-central gyrus, left pre-central gyrus, post-central gyrus, left supramarginal gyrus (SMG), right SMA, medial frontal gyrus, right middle occipital gyrus (MOG), bilateral FG, posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), parahippocampal gyrus (PHG), left caudate, left putamen, and pons (cluster <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005 corrected for AlphaSim). The left SPL, right SMA, and pons did not survive after we partialled-out the effect of age. The results are summarized in Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref>, and in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption><p><bold>Brain areas of fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) are negatively correlated with stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) across participants</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Region</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Cluster size(voxels)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Peak MNI coordinates</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>r</bold></italic></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>x</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>y</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>z</bold></italic></th>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right cerebellum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left cerebellum/Left ITG/ Left FG/PHG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">181/112/81/77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left SFG/Medial frontal gyrus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62/23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right MFG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left IFG/Left pre-central gyrus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78/21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right STG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right MTG/Right MOG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63/50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right ITG/Right FG PHG/Pons</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">321/182/88/94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left ITG/FG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">85/49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left SPL</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right post-central gyrus/Right IPL</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37/24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.47</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Post-central gyrus/Left SMG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41/35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right SMA/Medial frontal gyrus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32/24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left caudate/Left putamen</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57/51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.44</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>SFG, superior frontal gyrus; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; STG, superior frontal gyrus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; SPL, superior parietal lobule; IPL, intra-parietal lobule; SMA, supplementary motor area; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; FG, fusiform gyrus; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption><p><bold>Brain areas of fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) are negatively correlated with stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) across participants, with age as a covariate</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Region</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Cluster size(voxels)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>peak MNI coordinates</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>r</bold></italic></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>x</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>y</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>Z</bold></italic></th>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left cerebellum/Left ITG/Left FG/PHG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">163/103/81/77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right cerebellum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left SFG/Medial frontal gyrus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65/20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MFG/Right pre-central gyrus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57/33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left IFG/Left pre-central gyrus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">109/21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right STG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right ITG/Right FG/PHG/Right MTG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">312/245/90/64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left ITG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">103</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left ITG/FG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83/50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right post-central gyrus/Right IPL</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26/22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Post-central gyrus/Left SMG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23/18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right MOG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PCC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left caudate/Left putamen</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23/14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.41</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>SFG, superior frontal gyrus; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; IPL, intra-parietal lobule; SMG, supramarginal gyrus; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; FG, fusiform gyrus; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Brain areas of fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) are negatively correlated with stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) across participants; <bold>(B)</bold> with age as a covariate. Blue indicates negative correlations. The threshold was set at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005 under AlphaSim correction. The number below the images refer to the z coordinates (axial view), or x coordinates (sagittal view).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-08-00766-g0002.tif"/>
</fig></sec>
<sec>
<title>Overlap between ReHo-SSRT and fALFF-SSRT correlations</title>
<p>The conjunction analysis revealed that bilateral cerebellum, pons, bilateral ITG, bilateral FG, PHG, left IFG, and medial frontal gyrus were found in the overlapping areas of ReHo-SSRT and fALFF-SSRT full-correlations. Overlaps between ReHo-SSRT and fALFF-SSRT partial-correlations (i.e., partialling-out the effect of age) were found in bilateral cerebellum, bilateral ITG, right MTG, bilateral FG, bilateral, PHG, left STG, and left IFG. The results are summarized in Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T8">8</xref>, and in Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T7">
<label>Table 7</label>
<caption><p><bold>Overlapping brain areas between the two sets of correlations via a conjunction analysis: (1) correlation of regional homogeneity (ReHo) and stop-signal reaction time (SSRT); (2) correlation of fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) and stop-signal reaction time (SSRT)</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Region</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Cluster size (voxels)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Peak MNI coordinates</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>r</bold></italic></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>x</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>Y</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>Z</bold></italic></th>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right cerebellum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right cerebellum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right cerebellum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;84</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right cerebellum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left cerebellum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pons</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lef ITG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right ITG/Right FG/Right PHG/Right MTG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">153/142/42/31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left ITG/Left cerebellum/Left FG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98/61/48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left ITG/Left FG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60/35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left PHG/Left IFG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22/15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Medial frontal gyrus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.45</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; FG, fusiform gyrus; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T8">
<label>Table 8</label>
<caption><p><bold>Overlapping brain areas between the two sets of correlations via a conjunction analysis: (1) Partial correlation of regional homogeneity (ReHo) and stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) with age as a covariate; (2) Partial correlation of fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) and stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) with age as a covariate</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Region</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Cluster size (voxels)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Peak MNI coordinates</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic><bold>r</bold></italic></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>x</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>y</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>z</bold></th>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right cerebellum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left cerebellum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.47</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right ITG/Right FG/Right PHG/Right MTG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">198/185/66/40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left ITG/Left cerebellum/Left PHG/Left FG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95/60/53/53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left PHG/Left STG/Left IFG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">215/9/9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left ITG/Left FG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72/43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.45</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; FG, fusiform gyrus; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus. STG, superior temporal gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Overlapping brain areas between the two sets of correlations via a conjunction analysis: (1) correlation of regional homogeneity (ReHo) and stop-signal reaction time (SSRT); (2) correlation of fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) and SSRT. Blue indicates negative correlations. The threshold was set at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005 under AlphaSim correction; <bold>(B)</bold> Overlap of ReHo-SSRT and fALFF-SSRT correlation maps. The number below the images refer to the z coordinates (axial view), y coordinates (coronal view), or x coordinates (sagittal view). Regions in red show significance in both ReHo-SSRT (in green) and fALFF-SSRT (in orange) correlation maps.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-08-00766-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Overlapping brain areas between the two sets of correlations via a conjunction analysis: (1) partial correlation of regional homogeneity (ReHo) and stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), with age as a covariate; (2) partial correlation of fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) and SSRT, with age as a covariate. Blue indicates negative correlations. The threshold was set at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005 under AlphaSim correction; <bold>(B)</bold> Overlap of ReHo-SSRT and fALFF-SSRT partial correlation maps, with age as a covariate. The number below the images refer to the z coordinates (axial view), y coordinates (coronal view), or x coordinates (sagittal view). Regions in red show significance in both ReHo-SSRT (in green) and fALFF-SSRT (in orange) partial correlation maps.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpsyg-08-00766-g0004.tif"/>
</fig></sec></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>This study aimed to examine whether spontaneous brain activity evaluated by resting-state fMRI can be used as an indicator of individual differences in association with inhibitory performance even in healthy middle-aged and aged people. We used two local FC analysis methods (ReHo and fALFF) to evaluate the relationship between spontaneous brain connectivity and stopping performance as reflected on SSRT, and we focused on overlapping regions measured across the two methods to provide more conservative results (Ni et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2016</xref>). The current behavioral results showed that SSRT was not prolonged as a function of age, suggesting that there was no age-related reduction in stopping ability, which was consistent with Kray et al.&#x00027;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2009</xref>) findings. Yet, the null finding may be simply a result of a reduction in stopping ability that reached a plateau around middle age, because the current study recruited only elderly people. Alternatively, since there seemed to be a &#x0201C;statistical trend&#x0201D; (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003D; 0.07) and the medium effect size (Cohen&#x00027;s <italic>d</italic> &#x0003D; 0.45) seemed to suggest that taking a larger sample size might bring this effect into statistical significance. However, this issue is beyond the scope of the current study, because we focused only on elder populations.</p>
<p>We investigated if RS-fMRI is an effective indicator in association with stopping ability in the elderly. The current RS-fMRI results showed that the FC correlation results of the two local FC analysis methods, i.e., ReHo and fALFF with SSRT, overlapped in several brain regions (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T8">8</xref>). These results can be summarized into four main features: the activities during the resting state of (1) some parts of the DMN; and (2) the left IFG and bilateral FG were involved; however, (3) the pre-SMA/SMA was not involved in association with stopping performance; and (4) the correlations between the RS-fMRI and stopping performance that we observed were negative rather than positive. The DMN is an interconnected and anatomically defined set of brain regions, consisting of some functional hubs including the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC)/precuneus, medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), hippocampus, and angular gyrus. The DMN has been shown to deactivate during external goal-oriented tasks such as visual attention or cognitive working memory tasks but it activates during the resting state, thus, leading some researchers to label the network as the task-negative network (e.g., Raichle et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">2001</xref>; Greicius et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2003</xref>). Its activities have been hypothesized to potentially influence goal-directed behavior and/or mental effort during cognitive tasks (Weissman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">2006</xref>; Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2007</xref>), self-referential thinking, emotional processing, and recalling memories. The current findings indicate that the medial frontal gyrus and PHG, which are parts of the DMN, were negatively correlated with SSRT, suggesting that DMN can also serve as an effective indicator to associate with stopping performance even in the middle-aged and aged population. Thus, a main contribution of the current study is to provide new evidence showing that the DMN is also involved and associated with stopping behavior.</p>
<p>Secondly, the current study also shows that the left IFG can serve as an indicator that is associated with stopping performance. The right IFG is well-known to be important for successful response inhibition (for reviews, see Aron et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2004</xref>; Verbruggen and Logan, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">2009</xref>). Although the current study observed that the left IFG, rather than the right IFG, was associated with the forthcoming successful inhibition, some studies have also reported bilateral IFC activations (Bunge et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2002</xref>; Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2006</xref>; Tian et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2012</xref>) or left IFG activation (Swick et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">2008</xref>), as we showed in this study. Therefore, the current results suggest that the left IFG may also play an important role in response inhibition.</p>
<p>Thirdly, in the current study, pre-SMA was not found to be associated with SSRT performance. The current results seem to be inconsistent with those of other studies, such as those by Chao et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2009</xref>), Chevrier et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2007</xref>), Li et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2006</xref>), and Hu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2014</xref>). However, these previous studies mostly investigated the relationship between the pre-SMA and inhibition performance during the on-task period, rather than the pre-task resting period, which we investigated in this study. Therefore, the discrepancy may be attributed to the role of pre-SMA in reactive motor inhibition, rather than the attentional processing of the stop-signal that was modulated by the IFG. Thus, the current results provide indirect evidence showing that the pre-SMA is involved in reactive inhibition, whereas the IFG is involved in the attentional processing of the stop-signal (see also Duann et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2009</xref>).</p>
<p>Finally, the current findings appear to be consistent with the reports by Tian et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2012</xref>) showing significant correlations between SSRT and the ReHo of the ITG, STG, IFG, and medial frontal gyrus, but there is one main difference. This difference is that, while Tian et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2012</xref>) observed positive correlations between SSRT and the IFG, and between SSRT and the DMN (MPFC, IPL, precuneus), our results showed negative correlations. A major difference between Tian et al.&#x00027;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2012</xref>) results and the current results is in participants&#x00027; age. This suggests that for younger adults, the correlation between the IFG and SSRT is positive, as shown by Tian et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2012</xref>), but for middle-aged and aged adults, the correlation becomes negative, as shown in the current study. Another study by Hu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2014</xref>) also addressed the correlation between resting-state fMRI and SSRT, but they showed a different pattern with a negative correlation between SSRT and the fALFF in the pre-SMA/SMA. In Hu et al.&#x00027;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2014</xref>) study, participants&#x00027; age varied widely, from 18 to 72 years (with 63 out of 111 healthy participants in the age range of 20&#x02013;29 years, and 18 out of 111 healthy participants in the age range of 30&#x02013;39 years). A potential hypothesis to explain the discrepancies between the previous findings of positive correlations and the current findings of negative correlations is a shift from remote to local connectivity during aging, which results in a polarity reversal for the correlations between RS-fMRI and SSRT.</p>
<p>To clarify if the current findings on the correlation between RS-fMRI and SSRT were modulated by age, we used age as a covariate while computing the correlations between ReHo/fALFF and SSRT, to partial-out the effect of age. The results showed that only the medial frontal gyrus was excluded and the left STG was additionally included, whereas the bilateral cerebellum, pons, bilateral ITG, right MTG, bilateral FG, bilateral PHG, and left IFG maintained their significantly negative correlation with SSRT. Therefore, the current findings regarding the relationship between resting state activities of these brain regions and stop processing cannot solely be attributed to the effect of age. Our age range included participants in the age range of 40&#x02013;77 years (mainly middle-aged and aged healthy participants), because this study mainly focused on the elder population. Whether or not this might therefore underestimate the effect of age is beyond the current research scope and further research is required to address this issue. Finally, these results suggest that RS-fMRI may be a viable method to assess inhibition in an older population, in which it is often not feasible perform extensive task-based fMRI testing.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s5">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The results of this study showed that although aging may alter brain networks, the spontaneous activity of the age-related brain networks can still serve as an effective indicator of individual differences in association with inhibitory performance in healthy middle-aged and elderly people. The current findings have two major contributions: (1) clinical application: one may infer the stopping efficacy based on the resting-state neuroimaging for individuals who have difficulties completing the task; and (2) methodological conservativeness: this is the first study to use both ReHo and fALFF on the same dataset for conjunction analyses to reduce inferring inaccuracies and provide reliable and comprehensive conclusions regarding regional functional connectivity.</p></sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>HL collected the data, analyzed the data, and drafted some parts of the manuscript. SH initiated the research idea, applied for the funding, designed the task, supervised data analyses, drafted and revised the manuscript.</p></sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the Ministry of Science Technology (MOST) of the Republic of China, Taiwan for financially supporting this research (Contract No. 104-2410-H-006-021-MY2).</p>
<sec>
<title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec></sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack><p>We would like to thank Frini Karayanidis, Birte Forstmann, Alexander Conley, and Wouter Boekel for their great help in setting out this study; also thank Joshua Goh and Wouter Boekel for their help in the final revision. We thank the Mind Research and Imaging Center (MRIC), supported by the MOST, at NCKU for consultation and instrument availability.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>An</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>Q. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sui</surname> <given-names>M. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>Q. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zang</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Local synchronization and amplitude of the fluctuation of spontaneous brain activity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a resting-state fMRI study</article-title>. <source>Neurosci. Bull.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>603</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>613</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12264-013-1353-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23861089</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anguera</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gazzaley</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Dissociation of motor and sensory inhibition processes in normal aging</article-title>. <source>Clin. Neurophysiol.</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>730</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>740</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.clinph.2011.08.024</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21963321</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aron</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poldrack</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus</article-title>. <source>J. Neurosci.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>2424</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2433</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4682-05.2006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16510720</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aron</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robbins</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poldrack</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex</article-title>. <source>Trends Cogn. Sci.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>170</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>177</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15050513</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Band</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Der Molen</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Logan</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure</article-title>. <source>Acta Psychol.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>105</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>142</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00079-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12521663</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beck</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Steer</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>G. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Beck depression inventory-II</article-title>. <source>San Antonio</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>490</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>498</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bedard</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nichols</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barbosa</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schachar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Logan</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tannock</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>The development of selective inhibitory control across the life span</article-title>. <source>Dev. Neuropsychol.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>93</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>111</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1207/S15326942DN2101</pub-id>_5<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12058837</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Biswal</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kylen</surname> <given-names>J. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hyde</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Simultaneous assessment of flow and BOLD signals in resting-state functional connectivity maps</article-title>. <source>NMR Biomed.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>165</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>170</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199706/08)10:4/5&#x0003C;165::AID-NBM454&#x0003E;3.0.CO;2-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9430343</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Biswal</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yetkin</surname> <given-names>F. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haughton</surname> <given-names>V. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hyde</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI</article-title>. <source>Magn. Reson. Med.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>537</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>541</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mrm.1910340409</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8524021</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bunge</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hazeltine</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scanlon</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosen</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gabrieli</surname> <given-names>J. D. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Dissociable contributions of prefrontal and parietal cortices to response selection</article-title>. <source>Neuroimage</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>1562</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1571</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/nimg.2002.1252</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12414294</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chao</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Activation of the pre-supplementary motor area but not inferior prefrontal cortex in association with short stop signal reaction time&#x02013;an intra-subject analysis</article-title>. <source>BMC Neurosci.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>75</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2202-10-75</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19602259</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chevrier</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noseworthy</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schachar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Dissociation of response inhibition and performance monitoring in the stop signal task using event-related fMRI</article-title>. <source>Hum. Brain Mapp.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>1347</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1358</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/hbm.20355</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17274022</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cordes</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haughton</surname> <given-names>V. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arfanakis</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wendt</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Turski</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moritz</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Mapping functionally related regions of brain with functional connectivity MR imaging</article-title>. <source>AJNR Am. J. Neuroradio.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>1636</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1644</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11039342</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Altered spontaneous brain activity in type 2 diabetes: a resting-state functional MRI study</article-title>. <source>Diabetes</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>749</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>760</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2337/db13-0519</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24353185</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dempster</surname> <given-names>F. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging</article-title>. <source>Dev. Rev.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>45</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>75</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0273-2297(92)90003-K</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duann</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ide</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Functional connectivity delineates distinct roles of the inferior frontal cortex and presupplementary motor area in stop signal inhibition</article-title>. <source>J. Neurosci.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>10171</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>10179</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1300-09.2009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19675251</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Erika-Florence</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leech</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hampshire</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>A functional network perspective on response inhibition and attentional control</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commu.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>1073</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms5073</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24905116</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Evers</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klaassen</surname> <given-names>E. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rombouts</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Backes</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jolles</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The effects of sustained cognitive task performance on subsequent resting state functional connectivity in healthy young and middle-aged male schoolteachers</article-title>. <source>Brain Connect.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>102</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>112</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/brain.2011.0060</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22497341</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gazzaley</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>D&#x00027;Esposto</surname> <given-names>M. A. R. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Top-down modulation and normal aging</article-title>. <source>Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>1097</volume>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>83</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1196/annals.1379.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17413013</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Greicius</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krasnow</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reiss</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Menon</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>253</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>258</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0135058100</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12506194</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Min</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Frequency-dependent changes in the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a resting-state fMRI study</article-title>. <source>Neuroimage</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>287</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>295</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.059</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21118724</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hasher</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zacks</surname></name> <name><surname>May</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age</article-title>, in <source>Attention and Performance XVII, Cognitive Regulation of Performance: Interaction of Theory and Application</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Gopher</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koriat</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group>(<publisher-loc>Cambridge, MA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>MIT Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>653</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>675</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hasher</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zacks</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view</article-title>. <source>Psychol. Learn. Motiv.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>193</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>225</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60041-9</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Healey</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Campbell</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hasher</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Cognitive aging and increased distractibility: costs and potential benefits</article-title>. <source>Prog. Brain Res.</source> <volume>169</volume>, <fpage>353</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>363</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00022-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18394486</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hsieh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Elderly adults through compensatory responses can be just as capable as young adults in inhibiting the flanker influence</article-title>. <source>Biol. Psychol.</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>113</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>126</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22445781</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hsieh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The boundary condition for observing compensatory responses by the elderly in a flanker-task paradigm</article-title>. <source>Biol. Psychol.</source> <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>69</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>82</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.08.008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25168289</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hsieh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Adaptive Strategies for the Elderly in Inhibiting Irrelevant and Conflict No-Go Trials while Performing the Go/No-Go Task</article-title>. <source>Front. Aging Neurosci.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>243</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnagi.2015.00243</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26779012</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hsieh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Inhibiting prepotent responses in the elderly: distraction and disinhibition</article-title>. <source>Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>124</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>134</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3758/s13415-015-0378-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26369924</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chao</surname> <given-names>H. H. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ide</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Changes in cerebral morphometry and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations of BOLD signals during healthy aging: correlation with inhibitory control</article-title>. <source>Brain Struc. Func.</source> <volume>219</volume>, <fpage>983</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>994</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00429-013-0548-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23553547</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Modulation of functional connectivity during the resting state and the motor task</article-title>. <source>Hum. Brain Mapp.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>63</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>71</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/hbm.20012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15083527</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kendall</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gibbons</surname> <given-names>J. D. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <source>Correlation Methods</source>. <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kleerekooper</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Rooij</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van den Wildenberg</surname> <given-names>W. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Leeuw</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kahn</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vink</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The effect of aging on fronto-striatal reactive and proactive inhibitory control</article-title>. <source>Neuroimage</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>51</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>58</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.031</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26899783</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kramer</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Humphrey</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larish</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Logan</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Aging and inhibition: beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention</article-title>. <source>Psychol. Aging</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>491</fpage> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/0882-7974.9.4.491</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7893421</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kray</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kipp</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karbach</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The development of selective inhibitory control: the influence of verbal labeling</article-title>. <source>Acta Psychol.</source> <volume>130</volume>, <fpage>48</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>57</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.10.006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19084817</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lei</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Spontaneous brain activity changes in children with primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis: a resting-state fMRI study</article-title>. <source>Neurourol. Urodyn.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>99</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>104</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/nau.21205</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22038619</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Constable</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sinha</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Imaging response inhibition in a stop-signal task: neural correlates independent of signal monitoring and post-response processing</article-title>. <source>J. Neurosci.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>186</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>192</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3741-05.2006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16399686</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bergquist</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sinha</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Greater activation of the &#x0201C;default&#x0201D; brain regions predicts stop signal errors</article-title>. <source>Neuroimage</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>640</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>648</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17884586</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Logan</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cowan</surname> <given-names>W. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control</article-title>. <source>Psychol. Rev.</source> <volume>1</volume>:<fpage>295</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mennes</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Colcombe</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Castellanos</surname> <given-names>F. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Milham</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The extrinsic and intrinsic functional architectures of the human brain are not equivalent</article-title>. <source>Cereb. Cortex</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>223</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>229</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/bhs010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22298730</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nasreddine</surname> <given-names>Z. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x000E9;dirian</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Charbonneau</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whitehead</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Collin</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment</article-title>. <source>J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>695</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>699</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15817019</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nedelska</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hort</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Aberrant spontaneous brain activity in patients with mild cognitive impairment and concomitant lacunar infarction: a resting-state functional MRI study</article-title>. <source>J. Alzheimer&#x00027;s Dis.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>1243</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1254</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3233/JAD-150622</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26836013</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nichols</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brett</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andersson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wager</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poline</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic</article-title>. <source>Neuroimage</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>653</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>660</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15808966</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nugent</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>D&#x00027;alfonso</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zarate</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Theodore</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The relationship between glucose metabolism, resting-state fMRI BOLD signal, and GABAA-binding potential: a preliminary study in healthy subjects and those with temporal lobe epilepsy</article-title>. <source>J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>583</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>591</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/jcbfm.2014.228</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25564232</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Premi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cauda</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gasparotti</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Diano</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Archetti</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Padovani</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Multimodal FMRI resting-state functional connectivity in granulin mutations: the case of fronto-parietal dementia</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>e106500</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0106500</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25188321</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Raichle</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>MacLeod</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Snyder</surname> <given-names>A. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powers</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gusnard</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shulman</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>A default mode of brain function</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>676</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>682</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.98.2.676</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11209064</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramautar</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Slagter</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kok</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ridderinkhof</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: the insula and the significance of failed inhibition</article-title>. <source>Brain Res.</source> <volume>1105</volume>, <fpage>143</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>154</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.091</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16616048</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sala-Llonch</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pena-Gomez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arenaza-Urquijo</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vidal-Pi&#x000F1;eiroa</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bargallo</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Junque</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Brain connectivity during resting state and subsequent working memory task predicts behavioural performance</article-title>. <source>Cortex</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>1187</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1196</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cortex.2011.07.006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21872853</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sepulcre</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Talukdar</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martincorena</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yeo</surname> <given-names>B. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buckner</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The organization of local and distant functional connectivity in the human brain</article-title>. <source>PLoS Comput. Biol.</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>e1000808</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000808</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20548945</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Swick</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ashley</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Turken</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition</article-title>. <source>BMC Neurosci.</source>, <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>102</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2202-9-102</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18939997</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takeuchi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taki</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nouchi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sekiguchi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hashizume</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sassa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Degree centrality and fractional amplitude of low-frequency oscillations associated with Stroop interference</article-title>. <source>Neuroimage</source> <volume>119</volume>, <fpage>197</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>209</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.058</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Regional homogeneity of resting state fMRI signals predicts Stop signal task performance</article-title>. <source>Neuroimage</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>539</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>544</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.098</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22178814</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tomasi</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Volkow</surname> <given-names>N. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Aging and functional brain networks</article-title>. <source>Mol. Psychiatry</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>549</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>558</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/mp.2011.81</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21727896</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van de Laar</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Den Wildenberg</surname> <given-names>W. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Boxtel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van der Molen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments</article-title>. <source>Front. Psychol.</source> <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>357</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00357</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22180746</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Verbruggen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Logan</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms</article-title>. <source>Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>647</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>661</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18822313</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ward</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <source>Simultaneous Inference for FMRI Data.</source> AFNI 3dDeconvolve Documentation, Medical College of Wisconsin.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weissman</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Visscher</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Woldorff</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention</article-title>. <source>Nat. Neurosci.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>971</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>978</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn1727</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16767087</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Aging-related changes in the default mode network and its anti-correlated networks: a resting-state fMRI study</article-title>. <source>Neurosci. Lett.</source> <volume>504</volume>, <fpage>62</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>67</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neulet.2011.08.059</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21925236</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andreescu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Butters</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamburo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reynolds</surname> <given-names>C. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aizenstein</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Default-mode network connectivity and white matter burden in late-life depression</article-title>. <source>Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging</source> <volume>194</volume>, <fpage>39</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.04.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21824753</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ystad</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eichele</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lundervold</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lundervold</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Subcortical functional connectivity and verbal episodic memory in healthy elderly&#x02014;a resting state fMRI study</article-title>. <source>Neuroimage</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>379</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>388</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.062</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20350608</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Di</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>E. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barik</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rypma</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Biswal</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Regional homogeneity of resting-state fMRI contributes to both neurovascular and task activation variations</article-title>. <source>Magn. Reson. Imaging</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>1492</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1500</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mri.2013.07.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23969197</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis</article-title>. <source>Neuroimage</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>394</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>400</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.030</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15110032</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>Q. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>C. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>X. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>Q. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>An improved approach to detection of amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) for resting-state fMRI: fractional ALFF</article-title>. <source>J. Neurosci. Methods</source> <volume>172</volume>, <fpage>137</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>141</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18501969</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>X. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Di Martino</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shehzad</surname> <given-names>Z. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gee</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The oscillating brain: complex and reliable</article-title>. <source>Neuroimage</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>1432</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1445</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.037</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19782143</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>X. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in human brain functional connectomics: a systems neuroscience perspective</article-title>. <source>Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>100</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>118</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24875392</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>