Front. Psychol. Frontiers in Psychology Front. Psychol. 1664-1078 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00390 Psychology Correction Corrigendum: Failing to get the gist of what's being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing Marsh John E. 1 2 * Ljung Robert 1 Nöstl Anatole 1 Threadgold Emma 3 Campbell Tom A. 4 * 1Department of Building, Energy, and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, University of Gävle Gävle, Sweden 2School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire Preston, Lancashire, UK 3Psychology, City University London, UK 4Neuroscience Center, University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland

Edited and reviewed by: Jerker Rönnberg, Linköping University, Sweden

*Correspondence: John E. Marsh JEMarsh@uclan.ac.uk

Tom A. Campbell tom.campbell@helsinki.fi

This article was submitted to Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

 28 03 2017 2017 8 390 31 01 2017 01 03 2017 Copyright © 2017 Marsh, Ljung, Nöstl, Threadgold and Campbell. 2017 Marsh, Ljung, Nöstl, Threadgold and Campbell

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A corrigendum on Failing to get the gist of what's being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing by Marsh, J. E., Ljung, R., Nöstl, A., Threadgold, E., and Campbell, T. A. (2015). Front. Psychol. 6:548. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00548 noise elaborative processing false recall semantic clustering speech intelligibility Error in table

In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. Due to a tabulation error, the total number of critical lures recalled was reported incorrectly. The corrected Table 1 appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.

Mean recall performance for the four recall measures as a function of two background conditions (no noise vs. noise) used in the study.

Dependent measure No noise Noise
M SD M SD
Mean number of spoken words correctly recalled per list 10.45 0.67 8.78 0.58
Mean number of spoken words per theme correctly recalled per list 4.41 1.09 3.60 0.89
Mean number of themes correctly recalled per list 2.62 0.34 2.48 0.42
Total number of critical lures recalled 2.42 0.37 1.46 0.19
Thematic (Semantic)-clustering (Z scores) 2.43 0.20 1.95 0.16
Total number of critical lures recalled 2.42 0.37 1.46 0.19
Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.