The Russian-Ukrainian conflict, which began in February 2022, has triggered a catastrophic and rapidly growing humanitarian emergency and displacement, threatening the stability of geopolitical relations. At the time of writing, the number of border crossings from Ukraine recorded since the beginning of the war stands at 19,729,989 and the number of Ukrainian refugees registered in Europe stands at 8,157,230, most of whom are women and children because men have been drafted into the armed forces since the conflict began (1, 2). Regarding the experience of forced migration, the literature highlights several traumatic factors that can compromise the mental health of these people (3, 4). Traumatic factors can be classified in relation to the period of forced migration. Before migration, people may experience violence, loss of family or community members, and disruption of family and community life; difficult and strenuous conditions may occur during the journey to move and, finally, reached host countries people can experience social isolation, joblessness and unemployment, language difficulties, different forms of persecution and acculturative stress (5, 6). These experiences are associated with psychological distress and an increased risk of psychiatric disorders; women are also more likely to develop internalizing symptoms (7). In addition, these people are at high risk of developing anxiety and depressive disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and suicidal ideation/behavior (8–11). To reduce the risk of psychopathology and mental suffering and to improve recovery it is therefore necessary to promote different protective factors, not only at the individual level, but also at the community level (12, 13). It is therefore important to carry out community actions outside of psychiatric service delivery settings to facilitate prevention (14).

To address these traumatic factors, from an ecological and multilevel perspective, the community, with its resources, can become a protective factor (15). Among other definitions, in the psychological context, community has been defined as a group of people who share the same values and interests and have similar experiences and needs (16). Concerning community protective factors in forced migration, it is possible to refer to both the migrant community and the host community. On one hand, different aspects of the migrant community can be relevant to cope with the difficulties of forced migration. In fact, faith in the cause of the community, a sense of pride in belonging to one's own ethnic community and the maintenance of one's own community values are protective aspects that facilitate the process of forced migration (6, 17). On the other hand, the host community with its attitude of acculturation can foster the process of hospitality of forced migrants by promoting multiculturalism and not considering migrants as competitors for material and intangible resources (18). In relation to these aspects the protective factor of resilience, understood as the ability to deal with traumatic events by finding the available resources, can also be analyzed at the community level and not only at individual level (19).

Community resilience understood as the ability to recover from traumatic environmental, economic, or social events and to prepare for future adverse events is conceptualized as a set of adaptive capabilities that can be categorized into community competence, information and communications, economic aspects, and social capital and can be used as a conceptual framework to promote refugee integration and wellbeing and prevent the onset of psychiatric disorders (20–23). In order to reduce the risk of psychopathology of these people, it was deemed necessary to implement mental health and psychosocial support programs (24). Therefore, interventions to promote community resilience for refugees were seen as necessary by linking the community dimension with individual-focused interventions and treatment to promote mental and physical health (25). In line with this, implementing programs in the host country that can foster the different dimensions of community resilience is a relevant aspect (19). In fact, the literature highlights the interventions that promote community competence, such as the sense of agency and empowerment, a sense of cooperation and common vision by creating moments dedicated to the sharing of one's own history or culture through the organization of multicultural meetings, day trips, or celebrating holidays typical of the ethnic culture of belonging (26). Furthermore, the host community can facilitate community resilience by promoting the social support offered by the different formal and informal community services such as the church or voluntary associations and by encouraging the creation of social networks to reduce the risk of isolation (27). In addition, providing adequate information about the host culture and political rights of refugees, promoting the dissemination of positive narratives about migrants, and encouraging access to economic resources through the implementation of job training or economic benefits deriving from the assistance of local non-profit organizations, are key aspects of promoting community resilience (17, 28). Finally, to promote community resilience by enhancing the various factors that characterize the community, the host context might take action to strengthen social support networks, create collaborations and partnerships among community organizations, enhance community resources, and promote the building of a community identity based on cohesion and agency (16, 29–31).

In this opinion article, we presented the community resilience approach to promoting refugees' integration and wellbeing and preventing the onset of psychiatric disorders, which could also be applied to Ukrainian migrants. In our opinion hosting refugees is a challenge also for the host community, which is called upon to deploy tangible and intangible resources that can promote community resilience and reduce risk factors for the development of mental health problems and psychiatric disorders among refugees, with a consequent reduction of health care costs. At the same time, a resilient refugee community can increase the resources of the host country. Indeed, in line with this framework, it can be argued that the design and implementation of community-centered interventions, with a focus on community resilience, are key aspects to protect the traumatic factors to which these people are exposed.

Given the difficult situation of Ukrainian immigrants, host countries might take steps to promote projects and actions that can foster the welfare of the individual at the community level, in addition to the individual. Such projects should strength the resilience of the refugee community who are facing the trauma of war and forced migration and who may later face a possible return to their country with its attendant difficulties. In order to do that, it is necessary to implement projects in which the community is involved, in which it's possible to promote agency and empowerment, and in which the different resilience factors of the community can be fostered, in a collaborative approach between political institutions and various community actors, e.g., through the CBPR methodology that involves community members in the whole process and promotes the implementation of actions related to the ethnic, cultural and sociodemographic specificity of Ukrainian refugees. Indeed, CBPR methodology can empowers Ukrainian migrant communities to actively participate in research and intervention processes, fostering community resilience. By leveraging their strengths and collaborating closely with community members, researchers can create impactful initiatives tailored to the specific needs of Ukrainian migrants.

In conclusion, further works are needed to clarify effective ways to implement projects by host countries to empower the community resilience of Ukrainian refugees.

LM and DP developed the idea presented. PC and MO developed the theory and drafted the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and gave their final approval.