Front. Psychiatry Frontiers in Psychiatry Front. Psychiatry 1664-0640 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.881898 Psychiatry Correction Corrigendum: Approval of Coercion in Psychiatry in Public Perception and the Role of Stigmatization Steiger Sahar 1 2 Moeller Julian 1 2 Sowislo Julia F. 1 Lieb Roselind 2 Lang Undine E. 1 Huber Christian G. 1 * 1University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland 2Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Edited and reviewed by: Tilman Steinert, ZfP Südwürttemberg, Germany

 *Correspondence: Christian G. Huber christian.huber@unibas.ch

This article was submitted to Public Mental Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

 22 03 2022 2022 13 881898 23 02 2022 03 03 2022 Copyright © 2022 Steiger, Moeller, Sowislo, Lieb, Lang and Huber. 2022 Steiger, Moeller, Sowislo, Lieb, Lang and Huber

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on Approval of Coercion in Psychiatry in Public Perception and the Role of Stigmatization by Steiger, S., Moeller, J., Sowislo, J. F., Lieb, R., Lang, U. E., and Huber, C. G. (2022). Front. Psychiatry 12:819573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.819573 mental illness stigma social distance perceived dangerousness coercive measures population survey

In the original article, there was an error in the number of participants.

A correction has been made to Methods, Samples and Procedures, paragraph two.

The original text “Data from 11,095 participants who had received the clinic vignette could not be entered in the current analyses, as rating approval of coercion for the fictitious character was differently operationalized in their questionnaire” has been changed to “Data from 1,095 participants who had received the clinic vignette could not be entered in the current analyses, as rating approval of coercion was differently operationalized in their questionnaire.”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.