AUTHOR=Tagarev Todor 
  
TITLE=Models for incorporating counter-disinformation efforts into national security architectures
  
JOURNAL=Frontiers in Political Science
  
VOLUME=Volume 8 - 2026
  
YEAR=2026
  
URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/political-science/articles/10.3389/fpos.2026.1897504
  
DOI=10.3389/fpos.2026.1897504
  
ISSN=2673-3145
  
ABSTRACT=Disinformation, information influence, and cognitive warfare have become central national security concerns in the digital age. This article examines how democratic countries incorporate counter-disinformation efforts into national security architectures while preserving democratic freedoms, media pluralism, accountability, and public trust. It develops an analytical framework based on actor and task taxonomies, six conceptual institutional models, five governance dimensions, and national profiles of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Israel, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Romania, Sweden, Taiwan, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The study shows that democratic states do not converge toward a single model for countering disinformation. Instead, they organize counter-disinformation ecosystems through different combinations of distributed governmental coordination, specialized interagency mechanisms, dedicated agencies, embedded security functions, public-private partnerships, and societal or externally implemented arrangements. The article maps these approaches across five dimensions: centralization, specialization, obligations on non-state actors, enforcement orientation, and security-resilience framing. The findings suggest that national architectures are shaped not only by threat intensity but also by strategic culture, institutional inheritance, legal constraints, democratic norms, and state-society relations. The article contributes to research on disinformation, hybrid threats, democratic resilience, strategic communication, governance models, and institutional design by shifting attention from the content and effects of information to the organization of national response ecosystems. It also offers policymakers a framework for identifying design options and trade-offs suitable for democratic societies.